GEORGE SOROS IS A TRAITOR TO AMERICA
George Soros Became the Target of Both Anti-Semites and Right-Wing Jews
E. Cortellessa - The Times of Israel
more people seem to increasingly retreat into their tribal loyalties, George Soros has brought two divergent
tribes together. He has become the go-to bogeyman of both the Jewish right and anti-Semites ... Beyond being one
of the main funders of Democratic candidates in the United States, he also dips his money into left-wing advocacy
groups. Through his organization, Open Society Foundations, an international grant-making network, he has been
a primary donor of the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, and Democracy Alliance. He also gave
large sums of money to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, including $1 million to
a Super PAC supporting the former during the 2012 campaign.
Click on this text to watch: The International Financing of Engineered Migration (SOROS)...
Open Society Foundations
(OSF), formerly the Open Society Institute, is an international grantmaking network founded by business magnate and Rothschild errand boy George Soros. Open Society Foundations financially support civil society groups around the world, with a stated aim of making you think
that they are advancing justice, education, public health and independent media. The group's name is inspired by
Karl Popper's 1945 book The Open Society and Its Enemies.
The OSF has branches in 37 countries,
encompassing a group of country and regional foundations, such as the Open Society Initiative for West Africa, and the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa; its headquarters are in New York City. In 2018, OSF announced it was closing its European office in Budapest and moving to Berlin, in response to legislation passed by the Hungarian Government targeting the foundation's activities. Since its establishment
in 1993, OSF has reported expenditures in excess of $11 billion mostly in grants towards NGOs, aligned with the organisation's mission of forwarding the Rothschild's Global Domination scheme.
Click on this text to watch: Did Soros Hijack The ACLU?
Soros Hack: Top 10 Machinations of a NWO Master Manipulator
The recent Soros hack – the hacking and release of 2500+ emails and documents release by DCLeaks – shows black-and-white proof of the machinations, manipulations and massively long reach of Hungarian-born Jew,
multi-billionaire, top Hillary Clinton donor, arch manipulator and big-time New World Order insider George Soros.
The MSM is ignoring the Soros hack, which is to be expected, but those coming to it
with little or no knowledge of the man will be blown away by the extent to which Soros directs world affairs.
This man is extremely influential and deserves to be focused upon in the same way
that the Rockefellers and Rothschilds have been.
He has been behind some extremely important political movements in the US
(e.g. BLM or Black Lives Matter) and geopolitical events around the world (e.g. the US-funded Ukrainian coup which installed a Neo-Nazi puppet government).
Soros’ favorite method is to fund color revolutions (fake grassroots uprisings) through his numerous NGOs (Non-Governmental
Organizations) which specialize in propaganda and the overthrow of democratically elected foreign governments
Soros and his NGOs were banned last year in 2015 by Russia as a threat to national security, and the Soros hack shows us why Russian leaders don’t want the
man near their nation.
If There’s a Movement, Good Chance Soros
is Behind It
So just what do these
emails reveal about Soros? He has an incredible array of Open Society
in numerous countries across the world, all of which are pushing his particular agendas, such as open borders,
unfettered migration, welfare and support for illegal migrants, “social justice” (a loaded term which
means many different things to different people) and the “humanitarian” spreading of US “democracy”
around the world (more loaded terms and doublespeak).
The leaked documents include proof that Soros has been
involved in all of the below top 10 machinations. Soros is actively intervening and interfering on a colossal scale.
He is causing problems and chaos (including murder and war) to reshape
the world in his view (ordo ab chao):
to sway a US Supreme Court decision to get documentation and welfare for undocumented or illegal immigrant parents of a child US citizen:
“Grantees are seeking to influence the Justices (primarily via a sophisticated amicus briefs and media
strategy) in hopes of securing a favorable ruling in U.S. v. Texas, and using the case to redefine messaging and
align the movement.”
2. Trying to buy journalists
to present a favorable Ukraine narrative:
“Select journalists from the 5 target countries (Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece)
and offer them long stay reporting trips in Ukraine.
“Rather than specify what they should write
about they should make suggestions for articles; we retain a veto on stories we think are counterproductive …
this isn’t proper independent journalism and we may damage our credibility with journalists.
“Journalists may produce stories that have no relevance for the narrative we seek to inform or stories that
are counterproductive (enforcing narratives of fascism etc.)”
(Remember that in June 2015, a
small group of Ukrainian hackers exposed the communication between new president Petro Poroshenko (US asset) and Soros, which showed that Soros was the puppet master assuring Poroshenko of US help.)
3. Influencing and trying to take advantage of the European migrant crisis:
“Our premise for engaging in work related to governance was that, in addition to mitigating
the negative effects of enforcement, we should also be supporting actors in the field proactively seeking to change
the policies, rules, and regulations that govern migration.
“We also believed that advances
at the regional or international levels could create impetus for policy change or implementation of existing norms
at the national level. We deliberately avoided the term “global governance” because there is no single
system at the global level for managing migration.”
4. Trying to reform immigration law throughout Europe and the world, including a US immigration law passed by the “Gang of Eight” senators:
“The current refugee crisis is creating space to reconsider the governance of migration
and the international refugee regime … reforming migration governance at the global level.”
“Although [comprehensive immigration reform] was not achieved, winning the Senate with such a large,
bipartisan majority was a partial victory and further than the movement had gotten in recent decades, and, as a
result of the effort, the immigrant rights movement infrastructure matured and ultimately emerged stronger, more
coordinated, and more cohesive.” – Document including a presentation from Ivy O. Suriyopas, a program
officer with OSF’s U.S. Programs
BLM (Black Lives Matter) to the tune of $650,000, which had more to do with instigating violent anti-police riots than genuinely helping black people in poverty facing
racism and discrimination:
“Recognizing the need for strategic assistance, the
U.S. Programs Board approved $650,000 in Opportunities Fund support to invest in technical assistance and support
for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.”
For more analysis on
how the BLM movement is being coordinated at higher levels, along with the migrant crisis, see my article Decoding Current Social Engineering Tactics of the Anglo-American-Zionist NWO.
Wikileaks added to the Soros hack
by showing George Soros told Hillary (as Sec. of State) how to intervene in Albania.
6. Dictating to then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton how to handle a political situation in Albania (as revealed by Wikileaks):
“Dear Hillary, A serious situation has arisen in Albania which
needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government. You may know that an opposition demonstration in
Tirana on Friday resulted in the deaths of three people and the destruction of property.
are serious concerns about further unrest connected to a counter-demonstration to be organized by the governing
party on Wednesday and a follow-up event by the opposition two days later to memorialize the victims …”
Soros went on to tell Hillary exactly who she needed to appoint as mediator: Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari
and Miroslav Lajcak. Hillary did what she was told.
7. Donating money (buying influence) to “social justice” through centralization of power in the State:
“Build state-based power: Advance social
justice in critical states through state-based issue advocacy and organizing where the opportunities to advance
(or the threats to) open society are particularly significant.”
8. Trying to make Greece support the Ukrainian Coup and turn against Russia:
“In general, and at your discretion, do not say you are doing this
for Open Society because it is likely to close down doors. There’s a lot of suspicion about Open Society
in Greece, mainly because of its positions vis-à-vis the former Yugoslavia.”
9. Gathering information on opponents to his agenda:
Daily Caller reports that Soros gave Center for American Progress (CAP) a $200,000 grant,
then two more grants for a total of $500,000, for the purpose of researching and monitoring the activities of opponents
such as Pamela Geller (Stop Islamization of America), organizations such as Jihad Watch and the Middle East Forum,
Liz Cheney (daughter of former VP Dick Cheney), as well as examining the role played by right-wing media, the
Tea Party movement and others.
the US Ambassador to Ukraine and other key Ukrainian figures:
Soros and his NGO executives
conducted detailed and extensive meetings with just about every actor involved in the Maidan coup in Ukraine.
These included US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, David Meale (Economic Counsellor to the Ambassador), Lenny
Benardo (OSF), Yevhen Bystrytsky (Executive Director, IRF), Oleksandr Sushko (Board Chair, IRF), Ivan Krastev
(Chariman, Centre for Liberal Studies), Sabine Freizer (OSF), and Deff Barton (Director, USAID, Ukraine).
I wonder where Vicky “Fuck the EU” Nuland is in all of this, but I’m sure she’ll be
in there somewhere.
In this excerpt below, Soros and Pyatt are on the same team in terms of propaganda dissemination after the illegal US coup:
“Ambassador: The short term issue that needs to be addressed will be the
problem in getting the message out from the government through professional PR tools, especially given Putin’s
own professional smear campaigns.
GS: Agreement on the strategic communications issue — providing
professional PR assistance to Ukrainian government would be very useful.
Gave an overview of the
Crisis Media Center set up by IRF and the need for Yatseniuk to do more interviews with them that address directly
with journalists and the public the current criticisms of his decision making.”
NGOs: Domination through Subversion and Infiltration
It is no wonder that nations now view NGOs very suspiciously. No doubt, there are many good NGOs doing important
work for the benefit of humanity, but on the darker side, NWO manipulators like Soros have seized upon them as
a vehicle of infiltration and subversion, as a way to covertly influence, control and dominate a country without
needing to overtly go to war with it.
Today’s battles are being fought with NGOs and electronics,
rather than armaments and nukes. We are in the middle of a giant propaganda war.
The Soros hack completely
vindicates the prescient words of JFK, who made a famous speech where he mentioned that:
“… we are opposed around the world by a monolithic
and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence – on infiltration
instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections …”
For anyone familiar with key
conspiracy documents, this approach of Soros and his minions also echoes what is found in Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars:
“Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a silent weapon by its creators,
but only in its own manner of functioning.
“It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled
by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains
of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of a marksman; under
the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.”
“The public cannot comprehend
this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon.”
“When a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate
its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack
up. Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare.
“It attacks the vitality, options,
and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources
of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.”
Conclusion: The Soros Hack Exposes a Vast Hidden Influence
Like so much conspiracy theory that turns out to be conspiracy fact, the Soros hack now proves the nefarious
and heretofore hidden influence that rich NWO billionaires like George Soros have on world affairs, foreign and
domestic, due to their practically unlimited funds.
If you want to change the world, $25 billion goes
a long way and will buy you a lot of influence over government policy and law.
The Soros hack is yet more
evidence that we do not live in a world where our leaders are elected; they are selected, and on top of that, they
rarely represent the common people, because they are beholden to moneyed interests, to the point where they are
emailed and told how to intervene and directed what to do.
The Soros hack is yet more proof that
the real truth of who runs the world is to be found in conspiracy research, and thankfully, as more and more leaks
and hacks surface, we are beginning to put the full picture together.
By Makia Freeman
The Myth of European
Democracy: A Shocking Revelation
an open secret that the “Soros network” has an extensive sphere of influence in the European Parliament
and in other European Union institutions. The list of Soros has been made public recently. The document lists 226 MEPs from all sides of political spectrum, including former
President of the European Parliament Martin Schulz, former Belgian PM Guy Verhofstadt, seven vice-presidents,
and a number of committee heads, coordinators, and quaestors. These people promote the ideas of Soros, such as
bringing in more migrants, same-sex marriages, integration of Ukraine into the EU, and countering Russia. There are 751 members of the European Parliament. It means that the Soros friends have more than one third of seats.
George Soros, a Hungarian-American investor and the founder and
owner of Open Society Foundations NGO, was able to meet with President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker with “no transparent agenda
for their closed-door meeting”, and pointed out how EU proposals to redistribute quotas of migrants across
the EU are eerily familiar to Soros’s own self-published plan for dealing with the crisis.
The billionaire financier believes that the European Union should receive millions of immigrants from the Middle East and Northern Africa, provide
each one with an annual 15,000 EUR in aid, and resettle these migrants in member-states where they do not wish
to go and are not necessarily welcome.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has accused the EU of “eating out of the hand” of
Soros. He believes that the billionaire open borders campaigner is behind the attacks on Hungary. The reason is
the government’s attempts to take legal action over a new law which requires foreign-supported ‘civil society’ organizations — many funded by Soros — to
list their big overseas donors in a public register and be transparent about their funding sources in their publications. The Hungarian government is applying efforts to close the Budapest-based
Central European University founded by Soros.
“The whole of the European Union is in trouble because its leaders and bureaucrats adopt decisions like this,” said Orbán. “The people support the ideal of the European Union. At the same time, they can’t
stand the leadership of the EU, because it insults the Member-States with things like this, and it abuses its power.
Everyone in Europe can see that. This is why the European leadership is not respected.”
The Visegrad group is trying to stand tall under the EU pressure
on migrants’ policy. The European Commission of Migration and Home Affairs is pushing a new bill to make
migrants quotas obligatory. At least 30 Soros supporters work for the commission.
Many people listed in the document are known for attacks on Russia. For instance,
Rebecca Harms, a MEP from German Green Party, regularly calls the European Parliament to toughen the sanctions
regime against Moscow. Guy Verhofstadt blames Russia for almost each and every thing going wrong in Europe. His
article Putting Putin in his Place made a lot of noise last year. In 2012, former Croatian Primer Tonino Picula, who was the head of an observer mission
from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), slammed the Russian presidential
election of 2012 as unfair, saying it was “skewed” in Vladimir Putin’s favor.
The Soros list sheds light on the question of what makes the
EU leadership implement policies, which run counter to the interests of Europeans. The answer is corruption.
The politicians bribed by Soros dance to his tune. They fight against the attempts of national leaders to protect
the interests of their peoples. Quite often those who oppose such policies have to face the resistance of political
elites of their own countries. The standoff between Hungarian PM Orbán and the Soros network is a good example
to illustrate how it works. The European Parliament under the influence of Soros friends is pushing Europe to suicide
by letting millions of migrants in.
It shows that the much-vaunted European democracy is a façade to hide the activities of power structure
close to feudal system with local lord holding the reins. It can hardly be called the power of people. The publication
of Soros list provides a clue to understanding who rules the EU and who instigates anti-Russia sentiments in Europe.
Actually, this is the case when EU member countries like Hungary happen to be in the same boat with Russia opposing
the very same US-based forces, while protecting their sovereignty and independence. This is the time for Europeans
to think about transforming the system to do away with outside pressure.
“list of Soros” exposes the EU as nothing more than a mechanism for the elitist billionaire to promote
his neo-liberal policies consisting of border-less mass migration, same-sex marriage, integration of Ukraine into
the EU, and war with Russia.
There are 751 members of the European
Parliament and George Soros controls more than one third of those European Parliament seats.
“European democracy is a façade to hide the activities of power structure close to feudal system with
local lord holding the reins.”
Via The Strategic Culture Foundation:
“The Myth of European Democracy: A Shocking Revelation”…
It’s an open secret that the “Soros network” has an extensive sphere of influence in the European Parliament
and in other European Union institutions. The list of Soros has been made public recently.
The document lists 226 MEPs from all sides of political
spectrum, including former President of the European Parliament Martin Schulz, former Belgian PM Guy Verhofstadt,
seven vice-presidents, and a number of committee heads, coordinators, and quaestors.
These people promote the ideas of Soros, such as bringing in more migrants, same-sex marriages, integration of Ukraine into the EU, and countering Russia. There are 751 members of the European Parliament. It means that the Soros friends have more than one third of seats.
George Soros, a Hungarian-American investor and the founder and owner of Open Society Foundations NGO, was able to meet with President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker with “no transparent agenda for
their closed-door meeting”, and pointed out how EU proposals to redistribute quotas of migrants across the
EU are eerily familiar to Soros’s own self-published plan for dealing with the crisis.
The billionaire financier believes that the European Union should receive millions of immigrants from the Middle East and Northern Africa, provide each
one with an annual 15,000 EUR in aid, and resettle these migrants in member-states where they do not wish to go
and are not necessarily welcome.
New World Order's Stealthy Tool of Subversion: NGOs
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has accused the EU of “eating
out of the hand” of Soros. He believes that the billionaire open borders campaigner is behind the
attacks on Hungary.
The reason is the government’s attempts to take
legal action over a new law which requires foreign-supported ‘civil society’ organizations — many funded by Soros — to list
their big overseas donors in a public register and be transparent about their funding sources in their publications. The Hungarian government is applying efforts to close the Budapest-based
Central European University founded by Soros.
“The whole of the European Union is in trouble because its leaders
and bureaucrats adopt decisions like this,” said Orbán. “The people support the ideal of the European Union. At the same time, they can’t stand the
leadership of the EU, because it insults the Member-States with things like this, and it abuses its power. Everyone
in Europe can see that. This is why the European leadership is not respected.” The Visegrad
group is trying to stand tall under the EU pressure on migrants’ policy. The European Commission of Migration
and Home Affairs is pushing a new bill to make migrants quotas obligatory. At least 30 Soros supporters work for
Many people listed in the document are known
for attacks on Russia. For instance, Rebecca Harms, a MEP from German Green Party, regularly calls the
European Parliament to toughen the sanctions regime against Moscow. Guy Verhofstadt blames Russia for almost each
and every thing going wrong in Europe.
His article Putting Putin in his Place made a lot of noise last year. In 2012, former Croatian Primer Tonino Picula, who was the head of an observer mission
from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), slammed the Russian presidential election
of 2012 as unfair, saying it was “skewed” in Vladimir Putin’s favor.
The Soros list sheds light on the question of what makes the EU leadership implement policies, which
run counter to the interests of Europeans. The answer is corruption. The politicians bribed by Soros
dance to his tune. They fight against the attempts of national leaders to protect the interests of their peoples.
Quite often those who oppose such policies have to face the resistance of
political elites of their own countries. The standoff between Hungarian PM Orbán and the Soros network is
a good example to illustrate how it works. The European Parliament under the influence of Soros friends is pushing
Europe to suicide by letting millions of migrants in.
Soros Hack: Top 10 Machinations of a NWO Master Manipulator
It shows that the much-vaunted European democracy is a façade
to hide the activities of power structure close to feudal system with local lord holding the reins. It
can hardly be called the power of people. The publication of Soros list provides a clue to understanding who rules
the EU and who instigates anti-Russia sentiments in Europe.
Actually, this is the case
when EU member countries like Hungary happen to be in the same boat with Russia opposing the very same US-based
forces, while protecting their sovereignty and independence. This is the time for Europeans to think about transforming
the system to do away with outside pressure.
By Alex Christoforou, Guest writer
PROOF that liberal protesters are paid (By George Soros)
By Rex Huppke Contact Reporter
Republican lawmakers across
the country have grown wary of holding town hall meetings with constituents.
scaring these brave public servants? Paid protesters.
Specifically, paid liberal protesters. (It's a well-known fact that all conservative protesters are volunteer and
have legitimate gripes that must be heard.)
Most in the FAKE NEWS media
will claim there's no such thing as a paid liberal protester. They'll say people are simply turning out to express
frustration over GOP policies and because they don't want to lose their health care and die.
But I'm here to tell you otherwise: Paid liberal protesters totally exist; it's an
excellent career choice with surprisingly good benefits; and each protester earns $1,500 a week.
I know that last fact thanks to Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Rifle Association.
During last week's Conservative Political Action Conference (it's like Burning Man for people who believe Burning Men should only be allowed to marry Burning Women), LaPierre railed
against "full-time" liberal protesters, saying they earn "$1500 a week."
He said: "All share one thing in common: They're angry, they're militant and they're willing to engage in
criminal acts to get what they want."
(That's three things in common, but who's
LaPierre, who earns a measly $1 million
a year not caring about gun violence, is clearly upset that a long-haired leftist protester can earn $78,000 a
year just for yelling and waving a stupid sign.
Sounds far-fetched, given that such
a salary would be more than $20,000 over the median household income in the United States. But I'm telling you,
it's the truth.
How do I know? Well, for starters, I read about it on paidliberalprotester.com, a website that I definitely did not create using $1.17 funneled to me via a vast network of leftist organizations funded
by billionaire George Soros.
website clearly says of paid liberal protesting: "It's a thing. And it pays BIG BUCKS!" It even quotes
me saying: "A great career choice." And I would never lie to me.
More important than the online evidence is my personal testimony as a man
who has built a successful paid protesting career. (Please don't tell my employer, the Chicago Tribune, about
this activity as it is forbidden by our ethics policy and would undoubtedly lead to my immediate dismissal. Your
discretion is appreciated.)
I won't bore you with the full text of my Paid
Liberal Protester Employment Contract, but here are some key excerpts:
initial job title of the Employee will be the following: Paid Liberal Protester. The initial job duties the Employee
will be expected to perform will be the following: Be angry. Be militant. Engage in criminal acts to get what
Employer wants. Cause Republican lawmakers to rush into 'safe spaces' and fear people they used to dismissively
refer to as 'sensitive snowflakes.' "
• "Compensation paid to the
Employee for the services rendered by the Employee as required by this Agreement will include a wage at a rate
of $1,500 per week."
• "The Employee's primary place of
work will be at the following location: Any space where Republican lawmakers are attempting to hold a meeting
with 'Constituents.' Employee shall be a 'Constituent' of said lawmaker, but won't count because 'Employee' is
a Paid Liberal Protester, as detailed in 'Job Title and Description' and as announced by frightened lawmaker."
• "The Employee will be entitled to the following benefits: Retirement Savings Plan in which
all Employer wealth is evenly redistributed to 'the workers,' aka 'Employees'; free marijuana; two round-trip
flights per-year aboard private jets owned by Employer (George Soros); annual subscription to 'Rhyming Liberal
Protest Chants Digest'; comprehensive health insurance plan (no dental); and free tuition to qualifying Liberal
Indoctrination Centers (aka 'universities')."
• "Employer shall
not discriminate against any Employee as long as said Employee is one of the following: an anarchist, a Marxist,
a communist or a member in good standing of the left-wing Socialist brigade."
most people become paid liberal protesters either for the money or the free marijuana, I've found the best benefit
is the power that comes with the job.
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Cowardville,
said Sunday that he won't take part in any town hall meetings because "liberal activists" will "heckle
and scream at me."
Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Scaredytown, said in a statement that he won't do town hall meetings for now: "Unfortunately, at this time there
are groups from the more violent strains of the leftist ideology, some even being paid, who are preying on public
town halls to wreak havoc and threaten public safety."
I recently had "Havoc Wreaker" tattooed on my forehead.)
Illinois Rep. Randy Hultgren, R-Dontyellatme, has said he prefers to meet with constituents in small groups because some liberal protesters are "following
a well-publicized 'playbook' on how best to disrupt and prevent a civil dialogue." That's correct. The playbook
is distributed with the employee manual and the black ski mask employees are required to wear while vandalizing.
See what I mean about power? All that and a cushy retirement plan.
what I call a career.
It's also what I call democracy.
JEW HENRY KISSINGER IS A TRAITOR TO AMERICA
China, Kissinger & Tricky Dick
Poor ole “Tricky Dick” Nixon has gone down in all of
shamelessly biased, content less, agenda driven
history books as the liar whose only notable
was opening the door to China as a trade partner.
And even his China trip from February 21st through
28th, 1972 was only a grandstanding
op as far as the clueless Nixon was concerned. The real
China summit was arranged, orchestrated
over by Nixon’s National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger.
Kissinger hammered out trade agreement proposals and
schemes with Zhou Enlai while Nixon and
Chairman Mao went sightseeing and attended numerous
Secretary of State William P. Rogers was
purposely left out of all the meetings between Kissinger
Enlai... and Rogers, as Secretary of State, far
outranked Kissinger! Such is the nature of perceived
versus actual power.
To make a long story short: The selling out of America
the Chinese began that week in February of 1972 and it
was orchestrated by the globalist-Zionist Jew,
And here we are forty years later as the second
in rank to
China as the global leader in trade and we are now
heavily in debt to China. American manufacturing has
been largely packed up and literally moved to China. We
are three trillion dollars in debt to China (the balance
the seventeen trillion dollar national debt is owned by the
Federal Reserve Bank, or owed to Social Security
is the all-American Chinese goods outlet
franchise and China can now militarily kick our ass much
than they did in Korea in the early 1950s. They
now make more and better war toys than us and it
as though they spend far less than us on
weaponry while doing it. And there’s not a goddam thing
or I can do about any of this... yet.
Independent Party presidential
candidate in 1992, and
1996, Ross Perot, was absolutely correct regarding so
called “free trade”
agreements that have had a
devastating effect on American manufacturing, and
therefore the economy.
The agreement known as NAFTA
American Free Trade Agreement) was correctly
predicted by Perot to cause a “a sucking sound” coming
from Mexico. NAFTA was implemented, and Mexico
sucked wealth and jobs from America, and is still doing so.
Jewish Zionist and
U.S. Trade Representative (1993-
1996), Mickey Kantor, was the lead negotiator for the
NAFTA deal. Jewish
Zionist, Charlene Barshefsky, was
the U.S. Trade Representative (1997-2001) who
successfully helped establish China
as a major player in
the World Trade Organization.
puppet for the Jewish Cabal, Carla Anderson Hills,
who was the U.S. Trade Representative from 1989 until
1993, helped Kantor with the NAFTA negotiations and
cut such a sweet deal for the Mexicans that she was
the Order of the Aztec Eagle by Mexico in
appreciation in 2000.
George H.W. Bush called upon
globalist Hills to help hammer out the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) that totally
gutted any and all trade advantages for America related
Hills and Jewish
Zionist, Robert Rubin,
presently co-chair the Council on Foreign Relations and
she is a Trilateral Commission
executive officer... In
summation, she is a shameless traitor to the U.S.A. along
BTW: Obama’s Harvard Law School classmate, Jewish
Zionist Michael Froman, has
been the U.S. Trade
Representative since June 21st, 2013. The Deputy U.S.
Trade Representative is Miriam
Sapiro who is also Jewish.
Then we have American Zionist Jew authors such as
Thomas Friedman who assures his readers that
trade agreements, and outsourcing jobs to
foreign countries is a great idea. He says so in his book,
World is Flat." But this three time Pulitzer Prize
winner is just flat wrong and should be exiled to the
country where his true loyalty lays ...Israel.
By the way...
Joseph Pulitzer, a Jew, established the
Pulitzer Prize for journalism in 1917 and is considered
of yellow journalism” as if that is a good thing.
Yellow journalism is a type of journalism that
presents little or no legitimate
well-researched news and
instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more papers.
Eye catching techniques may include exaggerations of
news events, scandal mongering,
headlines in huge print of minor news, lavish use of
photos and imaginary drawings,
use of faked interviews,
fake experts and fake witnesses and conjuring dramatic
sympathy for the underdog”
against the “system.” Sound
familiar...? National Inquirer comes to mind doesn’t it..?
The Inquirer’s executive editor is a Zionist Jew, Barry
Inquirer is owned by American Media Inc.
which is owned by Roger Charles Altman and David J.
Zionist Jews... of course).
Anyway, Nixon was fully aware that
a Jew could not be
expected to be impartial on Middle East policy and was
proven correct in 1973 when Kissinger
withheld news of Israel’s attack on Egypt and Syria
during the so called “Yom Kippur
War” (aka: 1973 Arab-
Israeli War, October 6th through October 25th) for three and
a half hours so that
Nixon would not interfere in the conflict.
Kissinger then instructed Nixon’s Chief of Staff,
Alexander Haig, to lie to the media
by saying that Nixon
was informed of the attacks immediately.
October 7th, the day after the “Yom Kippur War”
commenced, a telephone transcript revealed that
Kissinger was purposely keeping relevant information
from Nixon related to the Russian support of the Arabs.
was a possibility that the Russians might enter the
conflict, so Kissinger, without Nixon’s knowledge
approval, raised the American military readiness to DEF
CON 3 and personally drafted a letter to the
Premier, Alexei Kosygin, advising him of the American
alert status without advising Nixon.
So, a Jewish Mossad asset as Secretary of State was
with WWIII without the knowledge of the
President of the United States.
While on the subject of Henry Kissinger... Dr. Leonard
Horowitz (he’s Jewish) in his book, "Emerging
Aids & Ebola," reveals a very disturbing connection to
Kissinger and the CIA-Military
Germ Warfare Program.
quote sets the stage perfectly:
“Depopulation should be
the highest priority of foreign
policy towards the third world, because the U.S. economy
will require large and
increasing amounts of minerals
from abroad, especially from less developed countries.”
In 1948, Henry Kissinger, then a 23 year old American
intelligence officer, recruited
German expatriates to serve in
top positions in American military, aerospace, biological
science and medicine.
Twenty years later he quit his
esteemed position on the faculty of Harvard, and resigned
position as Nelson Rockefeller’s foreign
policy attaché, to become President Nixon’s closest
advisor as well as Director of the National Security Council.
Seeking alternatives to tactical nuclear weapons to
bolster America’s “diplomacy”
abroad, the paranoid and
egomaniacal Kissinger quickly ordered the
Army’s Chief of Staff to requisition
Congress for the development and testing of Aids-like
viruses. Within ten years, the Aids
and Ebola epidemics
erupted coincidently in the regions of Africa ravaged by
CIA military covert operations also ordered by Kissinger.
In 1984, Dr. Robert Gallo, of the National Cancer
Institute, claimed credit for discovering
the AIDS virus.
He announced that AIDS most likely originated from a
monkey virus that spontaneously mutated
jumped from one species (monkey) to another (human).
Dr. Gallo was a biological weapons contractor
CIA’s top secret “PROJECT: MK-NAOMI,” and was
paid to produce and test AIDS-like
viruses as early as 1970.
Dr. Horowitz followed an incriminating paper trail
leading from Kissinger to Dr. Gallo and his associates,
pharmaceutical giant, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, to the
CIA, NATO, and OTRAG (a West German owned
in Zaire with ties to Litton Industries that was a
leading American military contractor).
Another endearing stunt Kissinger pulled off was his
secretly brokering a deal that would guarantee
would have all the oil it wanted, at America’s expense, if
there were ever an embargo,
or any other sort of
interruption to Israel’s consumption of oil.
The September 1st, 1975 Israel-United States
Memorandum of Understanding required the United
States to maintain an oil reserve for Israel and
guaranteed the shipping of that oil to Israel in case of
crisis. The deal has subsequently cost the U.S. tax-payer
one hundred billion dollars since it was
enacted. The cost
to American taxpayers is troubling enough, but the most
disturbing stipulation of the
“Understanding” is that
Israeli needs would have priority over the needs of the U.S.
From Section 3 (b): If the oil Israel needs to meet all of
its requirements for
domestic consumption is unavailable
for purchase in circumstances where quantitative
restrictions through embargo
or otherwise also prevent
the United States from procuring oil to meet its normal
requirements, the United
States Government will
promptly make oil for purchase by Israel in accordance
with the International Energy
Agency conservation and
allocation formula as applied by the United States
Government, in order to meet
requirements. If Israel is unable to secure the necessary
means to transport such oil to
Israel, the United States
Government will make every effort to help secure the
necessary means of transport.
Again, there was, and still is, nothing more useful to
Israel than having a Mossad
asset, like Kissinger or
Rahm Emanuel, in the White House securing Israel’s
The following quote illustrates the total lack of respect
for American law and our
“The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional
takes a little longer.” ...Henry Kissinger speaking to
Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Melih Esenbel,
the Minister’s Ankara, Turkey office on March 10, 1975
Now back to biased, content-less, agenda-driven history books...
Publishers of American and World History books cater to
pressure groups for which history textbook content
extension of broader cultural agendas. Publishers make
books whose content are meant to suit the
groups, and causes more interested in self-promotion
than in historical fact, scholarly appraisal, or balance.
are certainly set upon by pressure groups such
as creationist-Christians, who literally believe the world
is only 10,000 years old, and by ethnic minorities with an
agenda of over-represented inclusion; not to mention
revisionists of every other ilk.
But what is revealing and
disturbing to me is the
deficiencies in Islam related lessons. Contemporary
American history books present an incomplete
prejudiced view of Islam that misrepresents its
foundations and nature. Islam is treated as a challenge
international security based on an unquestioned
adherence to the totally false cover story about the
9/11 was perpetrated by Israeli operatives (such as
Barak, Dominic Sutter and Bibi Netanyahu) with the able assistance of
Jewish Americans (such as Larry Silverstein, Paul
Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, Dov
Zakheim, Jerome Hauer,
Richard Perle and Michael Chertoff) who were assisted
by a few non-Jewish American traitors (Dick Cheney in
particular who was handled
by a Jew, Lewis
“Scooter” Libby); if you haven’t figured that out yet,
then you will be unable to figure out much of anything
else. So go watch some
more porn on TV and drink a
six-pack of Corona.
JEW RAHM EMANUEL IS A TRAITOR TO AMERICA
agent Rahm Emanuel was the first person appointed by Barack Obama, as White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel had
also been senior advisor to Bill Clinton.
Zionist Jews in positions of power in the White
House has been the case with every president in recent history. Rahm Emanuelis is an Israeli citizen and
son of a Jewish terrorist from Yitzhak Shamir's murderous Stern Gang, held highest-level positions in both the
Clinton and Obama administrations.
Click on this text to watch Sen. Chuck Schumer speak of the Two Leading Jewish Families Of Chicago that Got Barack Obama Started
In Politics (the Emanuels and Klutzniks)....
America's vilest traitor, Edward Mandell
House, is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the New World Order plans
that were to be implemented gradually over time to enslave the American people ... a plan that
has been repeated in Canada, Australia, Britain and elsewhere. He stated, in a private meeting with
“Very soon, every
American will be required to register their biological property (that’s you and your children)
in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient
system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which
will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced
to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property)
and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the lawmerchant under
the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills
of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights
and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser,
for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should
figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical
way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits
and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave
every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without
realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people
will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high
office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.”
the Obama White House?
The day after Barack Obama
was elected president, the Israeli press proudly proclaimed that the new president had chosen an Israeli,
Rahm Emanuel, to manage the new administration. "Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief
of staff" was the Ha'aretz headline of November 6, 2008. The controlled press in the United States, however, keeps the American public unaware that Obama's new chief of
staff is an Israeli, with terrorist roots and a sworn loyalty to the state of Israel.
Rahm Emanuel, first Chief of Staff of the Obama
White House, is the son of a real Zionist terrorist and served in the Israeli
army. The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Emanuel the "Acting Deputy Chief for North
America of the Mossad - Israeli Intelligence." Skolnick reported that Emanuel's father Benjamin
had been "part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden's Count [Folke] Bernadotte"
in 1948. Bernadotte was the United Nations envoy who was sent to Palestine to find a solution to
the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from Poland and Russia.
Here are some key extracts from the Ha'aretz article:
A day after his historic election to become
the first black American president, Barack Obama stepped into the role of president-elect yesterday,
inviting Rahm Emanuel to join his administration as White House chief of staff, Democratic officials
a former Bill Clinton adviser, is the son of a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of the Irgun
(Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in Palestine between 1931 and 1948…
Rahm Emanuel's father, Benjamin,
yesterday refused to comment on the report that his son was appointed White House chief of staff. He told
Ha'aretz that he would only comment after speaking to his son.
"Obama is a pro-Israeli leader and will be a friend to Israel,"
he said, adding that he was pleased with Obama's election. He also said his son is the namesake of Rahamim,
a Lehi combatant who was killed.
Emanuel is named after a Zionist fighter who belonged to the Stern Gang, which was a terrorist organization
linked with the Nazis. Before moving to Chicago, his father was an active member of this terrorist group of assassins and bombers, which was also known
as LEHI. This information is not discussed on CNN. The Zionist-controlled media censors these
disturbing, but important facts.
Emanuel's father, Benjamin, told Ma'ariv, a Hebrew-language
Israeli paper, that his son's appointment would be good for Israel. "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel," the Jerusalem Post
reported. "Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White
Rahm Emanuel with his brothers and father, a Zionist
terrorist from the Irgun and LEHI
The Obama White House chief of staff speaks Hebrew and spends most summers in
Tel Aviv, his Israeli father proudly told Ma'ariv. After Emanuel was named chief of staff,
none of the Zionist-controlled media outlets in the United States mentioned
the Emanuel family roots with the Nazi-linked terror gangs in Palestine
in the 1930s and 1940s. Naftali Bendavid of the Zionist-owned Chicago Tribune, for example, wrote a book
about Emanuel and spent a great deal of time with him, but completely avoided discussin Rahm's Israeli
roots in the article he wrote for the Tribune on November 6.
Bendavid wrote that Emanuel "is best known as something of a Democratic political
assassin" who "might not appear to be the obvious choice for White House chief of staff for
a president-elect who speaks eloquently of setting aside partisan differences and bringing the country
Emanuel is known for using gangster tactics to threaten people. He once mailed a rotting dead fish
to a campaign pollster who had not produced results to Emanuel's liking. Sending a dead fish to a person is a
well-known Mafia message, which warns the recipient that he will "sleep with the fishes" unless
he heeds the warning.
Rolling Stone magazine revealed more of Emanuel's gangster behavior
in an article entitled "The Enforcer" on October 20, 2005:
"The night after Clinton
was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner
with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting
"Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!" and plunging the knife into the table after every name. "When
he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape," one campaign veteran recalls. "It was
like something out of The Godfather. But that's Rahm for you."
"Republicans are 'bad people who deserve
a two-by-four upside their heads.'"
- Rahm Emanuel, New York Times, January 24, 2009
Emanuel certainly seems to have a penchant for violence, which might not seem so unusual for a person named after
two Irgun terrorists: one named Rahamim (Rahm), and the other an uncle named Emanuel. Bendavid's
book was cited by the New York Times of January 24, 2009, as being the source of the
Emanuel quote that Republicans are "bad people who deserve a two-by-four upside their heads."
Once again, the Times article, entitled "Obama's Partisan, Profane Confidant Reins It In",
conspicuously failed to mention Emanuel's Israeli roots. Obviously, the New York Times
considers this information it would prefer the reader not know. This is a perfect example how the Zionist-controlled
media controls public opinion by omitting important information.
It should come as no surprise that the New York Times article chooses not
to mention Emanuel's Israeli roots -- or the fact that his father was a member of the Irgun, the most
murderous terrorist group in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s. The
New York Times is the leading Zionist-controlled newspaper in the United States by virtue of the
fact that it has been controlled by the Sulzberger family, founding members of B'nai B'rith (secret organization
of Jewish Freemasons) Lodge No. 1 of New York, for more than one
hundred years. Likewise, the Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times are both owned
by a Chicago Zionist named Samuel Zell.
Sam Zell's parents, named Zielonka, left Poland in 1939.
The Zionist controlled media also failed to investigate the evidence
of Emanual's involvement with the impeached Illinois governor, Rod Blagojevich, and his role in the activity that led to Blagojevich being removed
from office. Blagojevich specifically told CNN's Larry King that he wanted the tapes of his conversations
with Rahm Emanuel released. So, why weren't they? Why is Emanuel being protected?
Impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and Rahm Emanuel
Emanuel's brother, Ariel, is film-maker Michael Moore's agent. The day after the election, Moore joked about Emanuel's appointment on the Larry King Show. Moore
made a film about 9-11, produced by the Weinstein brothers, which completely avoided mentioning the many
Israeli connections to the terror attacks. This is a good example of how the so-called "alternative"
media is just as controlled as is the "mainstream" media – by Zionist Jews.
Rahm and Ariel, Michael Moore's Hollywood agent
Americans should be aware of the role this violent and uncouth Israeli has played in the Obama White
House. The chief of staff controls the people around the president - he decides who sees the president,
what he hears, and what he knows. The people surrounding the president report to the chief of staff.
Emanuel was the intellectual handler of President Obama (a continuation of the role he has played
for years) and the controller of the White House. Do you think having an Israeli gangster with terrorist
roots running the White House affects U.S. relations with Iran,
Russia, the Palestinians - and the rest of the world?
left the United States to serve in the Israeli army in 1991. A person from
any other nation would lose his U.S. citizenship for serving in a foreign military. Why are Israelis running
the U.S. government?
NAMED AFTER LEHI TERRORIST
Emanuel's father said Rahm is "the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi combatant." LEHI,
a.k.a. the Stern Gang, was the most radical Zionist terrorist group in the 1940s. The Stern Gang
killed scores of British soldiers and assassinated both Lord Moyne and Count Folke Bernadotte (the United
Nations envoy from Sweden). They also killed hundreds of
innocent Palestinians, such as the civilian population of Deir Yassin. This Zionist terror group was
allied with the Nazis in their war against the British. Both of Emanuel's parents, Benjamin Emanuel (formerly
Auerbach) and Marsha Smulevitz, lived in Israel and are related to Lehi fighters. This is to say
that Emanuel's father, a Jew, fought with the Nazis.
Why would a dedicated Zionist, born in Jerusalem,
and a dedicated member of a Zionist terrorist organization, move to Chicago after the creation of the
state of Israel? Had he given up on the Zionist state? Not at all, Benjamin Emanuel had embarked
on a new mission for Israel – a mission for life.
After the failed "Lavon Affair,"
a series of failed Zionist false-flag terror attacks in Egypt, Israeli intelligence was revamped by Yossi
Harel, a.k.a. Joseph Hamburger. Israel sent scores of high-level agents to the United States, often with
an American spouse. The Emanuel family of Chicago is one of them; the Chertoff family of New Jersey is
another; Yossi Harel went to Los Angeles. There are many more.
Rahm Emanuel is the same Israeli who ran the White House
under Bill Clinton, as one of Clinton's senior advisors. Emanuel is the person who pushed
through the disastrous NAFTA legislation, a bill that devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector.
It should be remembered that it was during the Clinton administration, while the president dallied with his chunky Jewish girlfriend, that the foundation
of the Zionist terror network that pulled off 9-11 was laid. In 2009, Rahm Emanuel, the son of a terrorist,
was back in the Oval Office.
is part of the Chicago-based team of political Zionists with David Axelrod, Obama's chief campaign
strategist. Obama thanked Axelrod by name during his November 2008 victory speech in Chicago's Grant Park. Axelrod's father, Joseph, a Jewish immigrant from someplace near
the Black Sea, hanged himself in 1974 when David was a nineteen-year-old student at the University of
Chicago. His mother was a communist journalist in New York.
David Axelrod - Obama's chief political strategist and handler
Rahm Emanuel and David
Axelrod have been working together since 1984 when they teamed up to help Paul Simon defeat Sen. Charles
Percy (R-Ill.). These hard-core Zionists were not working for reform in Illinois; their only agenda was to defeat the incumbent Sen. Percy because he was the chairman
of the Foreign Relations Committee and was pushing for a settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
These Zionist agents went on to manage the Chicago mayoral campaign of Richard M. Daley, the son of
Richard J. Daley. Finally, these two Zionists spearheaded the campaign to put Barack Obama into the
White House. Axelrod and Emanuel, however, were sponsored by a much higher Zionist -- Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter
of Chicago's super-Zionist, Philip M. Klutznick.
Bettylu Saltzman - daughter of Chicago's Philip M. Klutznick
Axelrod has been creating and shaping Candidate Obama since 1992. "Axelrod met Obama when the senator was
30 years old and coordinating a voter-registration drive in Chicago and Betty Lou Saltzman, a doyenne
of progressive politics in Chicago, suggested that the two get to know each other," the New
York Times reported in early 2007. "In the 15 years since, Axelrod has worked through Obama's
life story again and again, scouring it for usable political material."
Bettylu Saltzman has been supporting and financing Obama's political career since 1992, long
before he ran for office. Saltzman is the only daughter of the Zionist leader, Philip Morris Klutznick.
In 1992, when Obama was thirty years old, Saltzman told Axelrod and others, "He will be our first black
president.'' Saltzman then commissioned Axelrod to create Obama, the presidential candidate.
Philip M. Klutznick
Saltzman's father, Philip M. Klutznick, was Israel's biggest supporter in Chicago. Klutznick, who passed away in August
1999, was the former president of B'nai B'rith International (1953-59), president of the World Jewish
Congress, general chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), president of the American Friends of the
Hebrew University, vice-president of the Jewish Welfare Board, a founder of the Conference of Presidents
of Major Jewish Organizations, president of the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture, and vice president
of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, among other things.
Axelrod and Emanuel worked together
to create an image for Obama the candidate since 2003. "For four years Axelrod
has had camera crews tracking virtually everything Obama has done in public -- chatting up World War
II vets in southern Illinois, visiting his father's ancestral village in western Kenya -- and there were days
when the camera crews have outnumbered the civilians," Ben Wallace-Wells reported in the New
York Times article of April 1, 2007.
Obama, the politician, was created by David Axelrod, who writes his speeches and guides his political strategy.
In October 2008 I warned readers that the Obama ticket was really a hard-core Zionist ticket in
disguise. In my article "Colin Powell: Liar & War Criminal Endorses Obama," I advised
my readers of the Israeli gangsters behind Obama:
of Obama, a puppet of the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, has less to do with Obama's African roots than with getting
Emanuel and his Zionist gangsters back into control of the Oval Office. Emanuel, the real boss of the Democratic
party, is the son of a real Israeli terrorist (Irgun and Lehi) and thug-in-chief of the party.
What can we expect from the Obama presidency?
Elected on a platform of "Change" after eight years of a very unpopular and dictatorial Bush
regime, we would expect a substantial change from the disastrous policies of the previous administration.
So what changes will we see? Will we see an end to the costly and illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Will the senior officials of the Bush
administration who willfully lied to start these wars of aggression be held accountable for their war
crimes? Will we finally have a proper and independent investigation of 9-11? Will the oppressive
Department of Homeland Security be dismantled?
If the war criminals are not held accountable and the most egregious criminal policies of the
Bush administration are not changed and reversed – what exactly does the Obama "Change" slogan mean?
Changing the curtains? Changing the Israelis in the White House?
Change of Zionist
Jewish "investment bankers" at the White House: Joshua Bolten, the son of a C.I.A. agent
and second Jewish chief of staff in U.S. history, greets Rahm Emanuel, Obama's chief of staff, erstwhile
investment banker, and son of an Israeli terrorist. Bolten served in the administration of George
H. W. Bush (1989-93) before becoming executive director of legal and governmental affairs at Goldman Sachs
(London, 1994-1999). He left Goldman Sachs to serve as policy director for the presidential campaign
of George W. Bush (March 1999 to November 2000). Bolten became Deputy Chief of Staff for George W. Bush
in January 2001 and Chief of Staff in April 2006. Bolten is credited with recruiting Henry Paulson - CEO
of Goldman Sachs - to serve as Treasury Secretary in July 2006. Paulson crafted the disastrous
A.I.G. bailout in which Goldman Sachs became the largest single recipient of taxpayer funds ($12.9 billion),
an immense financial scam in which the profits went to private banks -- and the costs to the U.S. public.
WHO IS PETER ORSZAG?
One of the key players in the Obama administration's $900 billion economic stimulus package
in late 2008 was Obama's new budget director Peter R. Orszag. The forty-year-old Orszag was Obama's
director of the Office of Management and Budget, the arm of the White House responsible for crafting the
federal budget and overseeing the effectiveness of federal programs. He had worked closely with Rahm Emanuel in
the Clinton administration - when the disastrous NAFTA legislation was passed - and
was one of the first Obama appointees to be approved.
Peter R. Orszag
"In the coming years, no bureaucrat will be as decisive as
Peter Orszag," Ezra Klein wrote recently in The American Prospect. So, who is Peter Richard
Orszag and what kind of decisions will he make with the budget he controls? Based on his background one
would be well advised to prepare for a financial train wreck.
Peter Orszag has an interesting resume. He has played key roles in some of the biggest
financial scandals of our time. Orszag was, for example, an advisor to the Russian Finance Ministry
during the reign of the Jewish oligarchs as they plundered the wealth of Russia. He was an advisor to the Central Bank of Iceland before it crashed in 2008.
During the Clinton administration, Orszag was a key advisor to Rahm Emanuel and Bill Clinton on the
disastrous NAFTA bill that devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector.
Orszag's background has received virtually no attention in the media. He has a troubling background, which
deserves to be looked at very carefully. Orszag, for example, should start by explaining exactly what
happened to the Icelandic economy. Orszag was, after all, the founder and president of the economic consultancy
firm which advised the Central Bank of Iceland - before it went bankrupt. How did Icelandic banks become so indebted? Ask Peter Orszag.
Orszag is an economist who served six years
in the Clinton administration
(1993-98) under Robert E. Rubin, the former treasury secretary who recently resigned from his senior
position at the woefully mismanaged and nearly bankrupt Citigroup. The fact that Orszag was a protégé
of the now disgraced Rubin certainly does not bode well for the Obama administration. Rubin strongly
opposed the regulation of derivatives when such regulation was proposed in 1997. Credit derivatives
of mortgage-backed securities were the key reason for the recent failure of a number of large financial
institutions, including AIG and Citigroup.
In 1999, Rubin joined Citigroup as a board member and
a participant "in strategic managerial and operational matters of the company." The Wall Street
Journal noted that Citigroup shareholders suffered losses of more than 70 percent since Rubin joined
the firm and that he encouraged changes that led the firm to the brink of collapse. In December 2008,
investors filed a lawsuit contending that Citigroup executives, including Rubin, sold shares at inflated
prices while concealing the firm's risks.
Orszag, a Jew, served on the president's Council of Economic Advisers
in 1993, under Rubin, when the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, Clinton's senior
adviser, was pushing the disastrous NAFTA legislation through Congress. Prior to joining the Clinton team,
Orszag was an economic adviser for the Russian Ministry of Finance in Moscow from 1992-93. This was a
period of rampant financial criminality during which many Russian mineral assets came under the control of the
so-called Jewish oligarchs who became instant billionaires. Most of these oligarchs fled Russia when
their crimes were exposed and now live in Britain or Israel, where they
Born in Boston on December 16, 1968, Orszag graduated from
Princeton University in 1991. He then attended the London School
of Economics, where he earned a degree in 1992 and where he obtained his PhD in 1997. The London School
of Economics was established by members of the Fabian Society, who believed in advancing socialism through gradual
reforms. The Fabian Society is a British socialist movement, whose purpose is to advance the principles
of social democracy via gradualist and reformist, rather than revolutionary means. The ideology of the
Fabians is said to be described in the quote, "Fabianism feeds on Capitalism, but excretes Communism."
after serving in the Clinton administration, Orszag co-founded an economic
consulting group company with his brother and Joseph Stiglitz called Sebago Associates, where he served
as president through 2007. The firm's clients have included the World Bank, the Nordic Council of Ministers, and
most notably, the Central Bank of Iceland. The once prosperous economy of Iceland has been devastated
by the current economic crisis, which its citizens say was carried out by a gang of financial criminals
who followed disastrous policies and advice - provided by Peter Orszag and Company.
Americans would be well advised to be extremely
vigilant with dangerous "Young Turks" like Peter Orszag and Rahm Emanuel running the Obama White
House and the U.S. budget.
The United States government today is not unlike the oil tanker Sirius Star,
hijacked by Somali pirates, except that the ship of state has been taken over by an organized gang of
Zionist pirates, an organization most people don't even know exists. This organization was created by members
of the Zionist terror groups, the Hagana, Irgun, Lehi, and their Mossad network. Members of these groups were
sent to the United States in the 1950s to raise dedicated Zionist
agents that would look and sound like Americans - but think like Israelis. In this way Zionists have
gained control over our government and media without the passengers even noticing. The only thing that
most Americans notice is that the voyage is not as smooth as they had expected and the ship seems to
be sinking. The Zionist-controlled media assures us, however, that all is well. Dream on.
intelligence is like the criminal organization, Quantum, in the James Bond film Quantum of Solace.
They are everywhere, supporting politicians on both sides of the aisle, creating and running governments
from the left and the right, yet you don't even know they exist. Over the past six decades, Israeli
agents have infiltrated every agency of the U.S. government and gained
access to the most critical computer networks. In order to understand
what the Obama administration will mean for America and the world, it is essential to understand the Zionist agents behind Obama.
Sources and Recommended Reading
Bumiller, Elisabeth, "The Brothers
Emanuel," New York Times, June 15, 1997
"Emanuel to be Obama's chief of staff," Jerusalem Post, November
Green, Joshua, "The Enforcer," Rolling Stone, October 20, 2005
Klutznick, Philip M., Biography from Biographical Directory of the United States Executive Branch, 1774-1989
(1990), edited by Robert Sobel, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport,
Wallace-Wells, Ben, "Obama's Narrator," New
York Times, April 1, 2007
Bendavid, Naftali, "Rahm Emanuel mulls
chief of staff role in Barack Obama's administration," Chicago Tribune, November 6, 2008
Rahm Emanuel mulls chief
of staff role in Barack Obama's administration
GOP strategist says Emanuel could moderate Obama, add tougher style
to complement boss' gentle touchNovember 06, 2008|By Naftali Bendavid, WASHINGTON BUREAU
WASHINGTON — Rep. Rahm Emanuel might not appear at first glance to be the
obvious choice to serve as White House
chief of staff for a president-elect who has spoken eloquently of setting aside partisan differences and
bringing the country together.
Emanuel, after all, is best known as something
of a Democratic political assassin. From his days as a top aide to President Bill Clinton to his recent
role leading the Democrats to a House
majority, Emanuel has relentlessly attacked his foes and gone ruthlessly after anyone who stood in his way.
Yet the Illinois congressman is mulling whether to accept President-elect Barack Obama's request that he serve
as his chief of staff. That means Emanuel would manage Obama's schedule, oversee the daily operations
of the White House and serve
as a top adviser to the president.
Perhaps the possibility is not as jarring
as it might seem. For one thing, precisely because Obama seems likely to adopt a unifying posture as
president, he may need someone practiced in the art of political hardball.
strategist John Feehery -- who worked for former House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Minority Leader Bob
Michel, as well as former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay -- said Emanuel could help prevent House Democrats
"Rahm is really smart," Feehery said. "He
understands that if Obama goes too far to the left, it's not going to be good for the Democrats. I think
he's the kind of guy who can knock some heads and help Obama guide the Congress toward the middle. I think that will be the goal. You will
need a bad cop to Obama's good cop, and Rahm will fill that role quite nicely."
his politics, have always been centrist, very much in the mold of Clinton. In addition, a different Emanuel
has emerged in recent years, one who has forged friendships with Republicans and shown an ability to work
with them on occasion.
Emanuel is a consummate Chicagoan; he was born
in the city and attended New Trier West High School in the northern suburbs. He kicked off his political
career working for such powerhouses as Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and former Sen. Paul Simon, before
joining Clinton's 1992 presidential run.
Along the way, Emanuel
earned a reputation for a colorful intensity unusual even in the hard-hitting world of politics. His profanity
is legendary and seems designed in part to throw his interlocutors off-balance. As a young political
operative, he once joined other youthful colleagues in mailing a dead fish to a Democratic pollster with
whom he'd had a falling out.
Emanuel excelled at fundraising, sometimes
screaming and shouting at donors until they agreed to contribute -- generously -- to his candidate. He
threatened to tear up checks if he considered them too small.
White House stint, Emanuel returned to Chicago in 1998, making several million dollars as an investment banker.
That gave him the financial freedom to mount a hard-fought race for Congress in 2002.
When Nancy Pelosi tapped Emanuel to lead the Democratic efforts to recapture control of the House in
2006, a certain mellowing and maturation became apparent. To be sure, Emanuel continued to browbeat
anyone he considered an obstacle -- steamrolling weaker Democratic candidates in favor of stronger ones,
for example, or engaging in legendary battles with party Chairman Howard Dean, not to mention launching
all-out war against GOP candidates.
But Emanuel also showed an ability to cajole, flatter and even stroke his stable of Democratic hopefuls, going so far as to send them Eli's cheesecake
when they'd scored a political success. His rants became more selective, deployed as much for effect
as out of true frustration.
Leading his party to its first House majority in 12 years, Emanuel has now become
the fourth-ranking Democrat in the House. While continuing to launch cutting attacks on Republicans,
he also has formed friendships with such GOP lawmakers as Reps. Adam Putnam of Florida, Tom Cole of Oklahoma
and Ray LaHood of Illinois. He's even become friendly with White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten.
He joined Rep. Walter Jones, a conservative North Carolina Republican, in an unsuccessful effort to
establish a memorial to the Iraq War dead in the U.S. Capitol rotunda. He also has teamed up with Republicans
in an effort to expand children's health
"Congressional Republicans respect what he has been able
to do," Feehery said. "They think he's a formidable opponent. They think he works his butt
off. They won't particularly love him, but if he's smart, they will respect him."
When Emanuel's friend Obama began closing in on the presidency, many thought Emanuel would remain in
the House. He is potentially in line to become House speaker in a few years, and he could be of great
use to his fellow Illinoisan as a sounding board on the mood of Congress.
arguably few Democrats have Emanuel's credentials for the chief of staff job. He has served as a top
White House aide, meaning he understands how that unique place works and where the pitfalls lie. And
he holds a top leadership post in Congress,
giving him insight into that institution as well.
Obama apparently has
concluded that this background, packaged in the person of an old Chicago friend, is too valuable to pass
Bendavid of the Tribune's Washington Bureau is the author of "The Thumpin': How Rahm Emanuel and
the Democrats Learned to Be Ruthless and Ended the Republican Revolution"
We are supposed to believe that Rahm Emanuel was only
the breaks on military trucks as a member of the
Israeli Defense Forces during George
H.W. Bush’s first
Gulf War. We should not question that this experience as
a brake fixer for the IDF gave him the skills to become
Chief White House Advisor...Baloney!
Emanuel became a very valuable Mossad asset during
H.W. Bush’s first
Gulf War while residing in Israel and
remains so to this day as mayor of Chicago.
Chicago’s Fiscal Storm The
deeply indebted city, with bonds already rated as junk, considers borrowing billions to cover its pension costs.
August 9, 2018
Economy, finance, and
When Chicago issued half a billion dollars in new bonds late last year, some investors
balked, though the offering was designed to protect them by guaranteeing that they would be paid with tax revenues
that Illinois sends to its biggest city. “It’s an untested model,” the research head at Gurtin,
a municipal bond firm, said of the offering—Chicago’s first under a new state law. Ominously, he worried
that if Chicago defaults, it was unclear how much protection holders of the new debt would really get.
Even as Chicago grapples with nightmarish violent crime, the city faces imposing fiscal challenges.
The city, which says that it will collect about $8.5 billion in local revenues this year, is burdened by an astounding
$28 billion in unfunded pension liabilities and another $9 billion or so in money that it owes to general-obligation
bondholders, as well as billions more in other debts. Chicago’s bonds, graded as “junk” by analysts,
are among the lowest-rated of any major municipality. That forces the city to stretch the limits of municipal
finance, seeking innovative techniques that might get new borrowers on board, but at the potential expense of taxpayers
and holders of Chicago’s other debts. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to see how this ends well
in the Windy City.
Chicago’s latest fiscal scheme is already making
headlines at home and in municipal-finance circles. Late last week, Chicago’s chief financial officer and
a financier close to Mayor Rahm Emanuel proposed the idea that the city would borrow $10 billion through a bond offering
to shore up its pension system, using a dedicated revenue stream in order to persuade investors to come on board.
The plan would seek to offset the pressure that the city faces from accelerating pension payments that it must
make in coming years. Chicago’s pension costs have doubled in the last decade—from $416 million in
2008 to $1 billion last year—and that’s just 42 percent of what it should be paying to fund new retirement
credits that workers are earning, and to wipe out its debt. Under a long-term plan, the city must double its pension
payments again over the next five years, and then keep increasing payments steadily every year for the next 30
years. Even then, the plan would get the system back to only 80 percent funded, if everything else about the system’s
projections stays on course.
Chicago’s bond offering would raise
money for the pension system, where the money can then be deposited in financial markets to earn returns. The
idea sounds simple. Chicago could borrow the cash, officials predict, by issuing bonds that pay between 5 percent
and 5.5 percent annually. The city’s pension system, meanwhile, projects that it will earn between 7 percent
and 7.5 percent annually in the market over the long term. By simple math, earning 7 percent on money that costs
you just 5 percent is a winner. “It would be irresponsible for me not to look at it,” Chicago CFO
Carole Brown told the press last week.
The problem is that those kinds of returns
are far from a sure thing. That’s why pension bonds have been behind some of the biggest fiscal meltdowns
in recent years. Stockton, California, for instance, borrowed $125 million in 2007 to bolster its underfunded retirement
plans and gave the money to California’s public-pension system to invest. The system’s investment professionals
promptly lost more than a quarter of the principal, exacerbating an already-emerging crisis, which provoked city
officials to file for bankruptcy. Detroit, eyeing the same kind of sharp increases in pension payments that Chicago
faces, created a complex pension-financing scheme in 2005 to raise money by circumventing Michigan’s limits
on municipal debt. After the market crashed in 2008, the deal blew up. A financial manager brought in to clean
up the mess took one look at Detroit’s retirement obligations and hauled the city into federal bankruptcy
Brown justified considering the maneuver because the city can’t
reasonably dig its way out of its pension mess with taxpayer dollars. She’s right: Chicago has already raised
taxes by more than $800 million in the last few years to bolster pension payments. Even so, the system’s
funded ratio keeps dropping. If the $28 billion that Chicago is missing from its pension system existed, and was
earning 7 percent in the market, the city would be garnering nearly $2 billion a year in new capital. That’s
money that—based on the design of the pension system—it’s supposed to be earning. The missing
investment returns, however, amount to far more than taxpayers can make up, so despite Chicago’s best efforts,
its pension situation keeps deteriorating. Brown said that the city needs to replace some of that missing money;
if it can’t, then Chicago’s pension-funding status will fall even lower when the next market downturn occurs.
But the Detroit and Stockton examples illustrate how things can get even worse with a big loan and a bad market
The big losers in all this may be taxpayers and borrowers of previous
Chicago debt, who should be looking with panic at the city’s maneuvering. Chicago is now guaranteeing the
debt of its newest bondholders by dedicating specific tax dollars to repay them. Detroit did the same thing, pledging
revenues from casino taxes to reimburse some lenders. Those lenders did get paid in full during the bankruptcy,
but other Detroit bondholders, including some who held Detroit’s general-obligation debt, previously thought
to be among the most secure forms of municipal debt, took a big loss, or “haircut,” when the city
went bust. With every new, secured deal that Chicago engineers, the risks for holders of the city’s older
Taxpayers face their own risks. Loans secured by dedicated revenue
streams tie up tax proceeds. The more a municipality borrows in these kinds of transactions, locking up future
revenues, the more it reduces its fiscal flexibility. Detroit eventually wound up in what fiscal experts call
“service insolvency,” that is, it didn’t have enough money left over to spend on basic municipal
services. Chicago has a far more vibrant economy than Detroit’s, but it also has more pension debt, and
Illinois judges have granted public workers extraordinary pension protections. The city isn’t even allowed
to reduce the rate at which workers earn benefits for work that they haven’t done yet, so the pension system
just keeps racking up new debt at alarming rates.
There’s little precedent
for what’s happening in Chicago, and no clear path out. Illinois doesn’t let cities file for federal
bankruptcy protection, and that’s unlikely to change because the municipal unions that have so much political
power in the Land of Lincoln hate bankruptcy, where contracts can be busted and pension debt cancelled. Still,
as economist Herb Stein famously observed, “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” But when,
The Sudden But Well-Deserved Fall of Rahm Emanuel
A majority of Chicagoans now think that the Mayor should resign.
by Jim Young / REUTERS / LANDOV
It’s hard to remember a time when Rahm Emanuel wasn’t a Democratic Party superstar. Go
back to 1991, when the thirty-two-year-old took over fund-raising for Bill Clinton. He was soon renowned
for making the staff come to work on Sundays, shrieking into the phone to donors things like “Five thousand dollars is an insult! You’re a twenty-five-thousand-dollar person!”—and, not
incidentally, helping Clinton afford the blitz of TV commercials that saved him from the Gennifer Flowers scandal, clearing his course to the White House. The legend continued through this past April,
when Rahm—in Chicago and D.C., he’s known by that single name—won a second term as the mayor
of Chicago in a come-from-behind landslide.
Nine months later, Chicagoans—and
Democrats nationally—are suffering buyer’s remorse. Last month, a Cook County judge ordered the release
of a shocking dashcam video of a black seventeen-year-old named Laquan McDonald being shot sixteen times by a policeman while he was walking away. Five days later, the officer was charged with murder.
The charge came after four hundred days of public inaction, and only hours before the video’s release. Of
almost four hundred police shootings of civilians investigated by the city’s Independent Police Review Authority since 2007, only one was found to be unjustified. So the suspicion
was overwhelming that the officer would not have faced discipline at all had officials not feared a riot—especially
after it was learned that McDonald’s family had been paid five million dollars from city coffers without ever
having filed a lawsuit. Mayor Emanuel claims that he never saw the video. Given that he surely would not have been
reëlected had any of this come out before the balloting, a recent poll showed that only seventeen per cent of Chicagoans believe him. And a majority of Chicagoans now think he should resign.
For twenty years now, there have been those who say
that this emperor never had any clothes on in the first place. Given the speed and intensity of his fall, perhaps
it’s time to reconsider their case.
Start with the 1992 Presidential
campaign. Emanuel persuaded Clinton to prioritize raising money. This, to put it lightly, caught up with him. And
while Emanuel was never tied to the fund-raising chicanery involving forgotten names like James Riady, Yah Lin Trie, and John Huang, it was that zeal
for cash that provided Clinton’s Presidency its original taint of scandal. Obsessive fund-raising is also
the foundation of Emanuel’s political operation in Chicago. When two reporters for the Chicago
Reader filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the mayor’s private schedule in 2011 (unlike previous mayors, his public schedule was pretty much blank), they discovered that he almost never
met with community leaders. He did, however, spend enormous blocks of time with the rich businessmen, including
Republicans, who had showered him with cash.
There are moral complaints
to be made about this, to be sure. But the behavior has also failed Emanuel on political_ _grounds: when
he found himself in trouble, he was left without a broad base of political support, unlike the previous mayor,
Richard M. Daley, who in similar straits fell back on his close relationships in all fifty city wards. When one of those rich Republicans donors—Bruce Rauner, with whom Rahm has vacationed—became Illinois’s governor, last year, at least the scolds could comfort themselves
that their mayor would enjoy privileged access to lobby for the city’s needs. But that hasn’t worked,
either: instead, Rauner has given Rahm the cold shoulder.
But return to Washington in the early nineteen-nineties, when a grateful Clinton
awarded his young charge a prominent White House role. There, Emanuel’s prodigious energy, along with his
contempt for what he called “liberal theology,” rocketed him higher and higher into the Clinton
stratosphere. “He gets things done,” Clinton’s chief of staff, Erskine Bowles, enthused
late in 1996, when Emanuel usurped George Stephanopoulos as senior adviser for policy and strategy. Among his
special projects was helping to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement and the 1994 crime bill. He also tried
to push Clinton to the right on immigration, advising the President, in a memo in November, 1996, to work to “claim and achieve record deportations of criminal aliens.” These all, in the fullness of time,
turned out to be mistakes.
NAFTA, in alienating
the Party’s working-class base, contributed to the Democrats losing control of the House of Representatives
in 1994. As for the crime bill, which included a “three strikes” provision that mandated life terms
for criminals convicted of violent crimes even if their other two offenses were nonviolent, Clinton himself
has apologized for it, saying that the policy “made the problem worse.” The attempt to out-Republican the Republicans
on immigration never took off. Republicans are the party solely associated with vindictive immigration policies,
which leaves them in the long-term crisis they’re finding themselves in now—identified as anathema
by Latinos, the nation’s fastest-growing ethnic group. If Rahm had had his way, that never would have happened.
After Washington, Emanuel made eighteen million dollars in two and a half years as an investment banker. (His buddy Rauner helped get him his job.) He
came back home—although diehards will insist that Emanuel isn’t really a Chicagoan, having grown up
in suburban Wilmette—and won a congressional seat in 2004. His next step was chairing the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee, in charge of recruiting House candidates. In 2006, he got credit when Democrats
took back the lower chamber. One Democratic strategist from California who saw him working a room of worshipful
admirers shortly afterward marvelled, “Inside the Beltway, Rahm is like … well, not Dylan or Madonna but maybe Britney or Paris.”
But that achievement disintegrates the more closely it’s examined. At the D-Trip, as the D.C.C.C. is known,
Emanuel aggressively recruited right-leaning candidates, frequently military veterans, including former Republicans.
But many of his hand-picked choices fared poorly, losing in general elections. Some even lost in their primaries,
to candidates backed by liberals—many of whom won congressional seats resoundingly, even after the D.C.C.C.
Victory, like defeat, can have a hundred fathers, and we can’t
know what was ultimately responsible for the Democrats’ success that November. Anger at Republicans for the
Iraq War (which Emanuel supported) certainly drove many voters’ decisions. What is indisputable is that
the 2006 majority proved to be a rickety one. Critics argue that, even where Emanuel’s strategy succeeded in the short term, it undermined
the party over time. One of his winners, the football star Heath Shuler, of North Carolina, would not even commit
to vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House, and was one of many Rahm recruits to vote against important
Obama Administration priorities, like economic stimulus, banking reform, and health care. Many are no longer congressmen.
Some Democrats now argue that, in the long run, 2006 might have weakened the Party more than it strengthened it.
“Rahm’s recruitment strategy” was “catastrophic,” the retired record executive
Howie Klein, who helps run a political action committee that funds liberal congressional challengers, said, and
it contributed to the massive G.O.P. majorities we have now, the biggest since the nineteen-twenties.
Obviously, that conclusion wasn’t shared by Barack Obama in 2009, when he named Emanuel as his
White House chief of staff. There, however, Emanuel’s signature strategy—committing Obama only to initiatives
they knew in advance would succeed, in order to put “points on the board”—nearly waylaid the
President’s most historic accomplishment: health-care reform. Emanuel wanted to scale it back almost to
the vanishing point. It took a concerted effort by Speaker Pelosi to convince the President otherwise. This time,
it was Emanuel who apologized: “Thank God for the country he didn’t listen to me,” he said after the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare,
By then Emanuel had became the mayor of Chicago, elected with
fifty-five per cent of the vote in the spring of 2011. Since then, there have been so many scandals in Emanuel’s
administration that have failed to gain traction that it’s hard to single them out. One signature idea was
lengthening Chicago’s school day by thirty per cent—controversial because he proposed compensating
teachers only two per cent more for the extra work. The Chicago public-schools inspector general was soon investigating allegations that a local pastor linked to Emanuel was arranging buses to pack public hearings with supporters of the idea, paying
at least two “protesters” twenty-five to fifty dollars each.
city also rolled out a new “smart card” system for customers to pay transit fares, a product of the
San Diego-based defense contractor Cubic. The system, known as Ventra, worked about as well as Lucille Ball on
a factory production line: some people would get on the bus for free, while others would be charged several times. The cards were supposed to double as debit cards for Chicago’s “unbanked” poor. But buried deep within the thousand-page contract with Cubic were nice little Easter eggs, like the seven-dollar fee for customers
who didn’t use the card for eighteen months, and another five dollars tacked on for each dormant month after
The manager of Cubic’s Chicago division while the project was under
negotiation had previously been the Chicago Transit Authority’s vice-president for technology; then, when
it came time for implementation, he spun back through the revolving door to his former city job. Well, that’s Chicago. Then Emanuel promoted the C.T.A. chief responsible
for the system as his mayoral chief of staff. Then he appointed him as the Chicago public schools’ C.E.O.,
following the resignation of his previous pick, Barbara Byrd-Bennett, ahead of an indictment for a kickback scheme,
to which she later pleaded guilty.
Byrd-Bennett had taken over the job
from an unfortunate gentleman named Jean-Claude Brizard, who was forced to take the fall when Emanuel lost a teachers'
strike in 2012.* She was then tasked with another of Emanuel’s sketchy initiatives: closing fifty-four schools,
many of which were in the city’s black neighborhoods. Why were forty-nine pillars of community stability
ultimately shuttered? Suspicions of venal motives abounded, but nobody could really be sure. A fact-check by Chicago’s public-radio station, WBEZ, discovered that many of the facts that the city gave about the decision
were not accurate. But don’t confuse that inquiry with a joint investigation by WBEZ and the schools magazine Catalyst Chicago which discovered that Emanuel’s claim about high-school-graduation rates—that they would increase by fifteen
percentage points—was also a mirage. (Dropouts are reassigned to for-profit online education programs that
demand very little work, and then are awarded diplomas from the school they last attended or one near where they
live.) Or with the multi-part series by _Chicago _magazine that blew the mayor’s claims about Chicago’s supposedly declining homicide rates out of the water, too.
(One method: categorizing homicide victims as “noncriminal deaths.”)
Now the sins of Emanuel are finally catching up with him. Lucky for him, however, the compounding
police-shooting scandal has erased from the news a peccadillo from this past November: the mayor’s press
team was eavesdropping and recording reporters while they interviewed aldermen critical of the mayor. A spokesman responded to the press by
saying that their only intent was also “to make sure reporters have what you need, which is exactly what
you have here.” That made no sense. But then so much of the legend of Rahm Emanuel’s brilliant career
makes little sense. The bigger question, perhaps, is what this says about a political party and the political
press that bought the legend in the first place.
A Treasonous Quote by dual-citizen American & an Israeli
progress we have made in the last thirty years is overwhelming. Now we are in total control, and there
is NOTHING America can do. America is now marching under our orders into WW3″
– David Bloomberg http://www.rense.com/general20/billy.htm
“I encourage my soldiers
to rape Arabic girls, since the Palestinian woman is a slave for the Jews, and we do whatever
we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do.”–Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2007/12/lobbies_role_in_middle_east_pe.html
“Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to
put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial.” Ariel Sharon
“I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him
and I would make him suffer before killing him.” Ariel Sharon
today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary,
to deport them, to expel and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath
the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it
means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care.” Ariel Sharon
”The progress we have made in the last thirty years is overwhelming. Now we are in total
control, and there is NOTHING America can do. America is now marching under our orders into
WW3″ – David Bloomberg http://www.rense.com/general20/billy.htm
Sheldon Adelson regretted he served in the U.S. Army rather than the Israeli military
Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is a major donor to political
candidates in the U.S. Would-be presidents curry his favor in the hope of receiving the millions of dollars he
contributes to campaigns. As a result, he is highly influential in their policies regarding Israel. The Adelsons
spent over $80 million on Republicans in 2016 and over $100 million in 2012 on Republican candidates and causes
– the biggest donors in the presidential race.
By Alison Weir, YouTube – If Americans Knew
Billionaire casino owner
Sheldon Adelson is a major donor to political candidates in the U.S. Would-be presidents curry his favor in the hope of receiving the millions of dollars he contributes to campaigns. As a result, he is highly influential in
their policies regarding Israel.
See, for example, this article (posted below) about his relationship to Donald Trump, and to Trump’s decision to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem
– an action that previous presidents from both parties refused to take. Adelson has also promoted anti-Iran policies.
Adelson and his wife Miriam
spent more than $80 million on Republicans in 2016. They contributed $35 million to help elect DonaldTrump, and
then gave $5 million to Trump’s inauguration. In 2012 the Adelsons spent more than $100 million on Republican candidates and causes, and they were the biggest donors in the presidential race.
Other pro-Israel billionaires have similarly supported Hillary Clinton. As a result of the Israel lobby, the U.S. gives Israel over $10 million per day – on average about 7,000 times more per capita than we give to others around the world. (More statistics here.)
In July 2010 Adelson, a
U.S. citizen, told an Israeli group that he regretted that he had worn an American army uniform rather than an
Israeli one. He noted that his wife and daughter had served in the Israeli army, and hoped that his son would
become an Israeli sniper. Adelson’s statements were reported at the time by NBC’s Michael Isikoff.
Subscribe to the If Americans Knew YouTube channel to learn when new videos are posted.
Trump’s Biggest Donor Pushed For Jerusalem Embassy Move
by Eli Clifton, Lobelog, Dec. 4, 2017
President Donald Trump may announce U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital while continuing to
keep the U.S. embassy in in Tel Aviv. The move goes toward fulfilling his campaign promise, during a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), to move the embassy to Jerusalem.
still uncertain if Trump will go through with this plan, but the pressure on Trump goes deeper than a promise to
voters. His biggest campaign contributor, billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, is showing growing impatience with Trump’s slowness in moving the embassy, which would be a provocation to Palestinians
who claim Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. For this reason, past presidents have refused
to move the embassy on grounds that it would upset potential talks between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators.
Before Trump was even sworn in as president,
Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, showed a remarkable willingness to follow directions from Israel’s
far-right prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The transition team appears to have worked at the request of Netanyahu
to defeat a UN resolution criticizing Israel’s ongoing settlement construction. Reporting on Friday advanced the story, revealing that Kushner told former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn to call members of
the Security Council in an effort to stop the vote, a potential violation of the Logan Act, which criminalizes
negotiations by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S.
When the Trump White House hasn’t been quick enough to back Netanyahu
or Adelson’s proposals, Adelson, who was reportedly in close contact with Kushner during the campaign, has been quick to express his displeasure.
Adelson, who once accused Palestinians of existing “to destroy Israel,” was reportedly “furious” with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in May for suggesting in a Meet
The Pressinterview that moving the embassy should be contingent on the peace process. Axios reported:
say the Las Vegas billionaire doesn’t buy the argument that the embassy move should be contingent on the
peace process. He has told Trump that Palestinians are impossible negotiating partners and make demands that Israel
can never meet.
Adelson and his wife Miriam spent more than $80 million
on Republicans in 2016, and he gave $5 million to Trump’s inauguration.
Adelson and his wife Miriam also contributed $35 million to help
Vegas Review Journal, which is owned by Adelson, wrote in October, “The Adelsons reportedly have been disappointed in Trump’s failure to keep a campaign pledge to move the U.S.
Embassy to Jerusalem on his first day in office.”
And before the funder got on the Trump bandwagon, candidate Trump was outspoken about Adelson’s
intentions in putting his money behind candidates. He infamously taunted Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who in October
2015 was a frontrunner to secure Adelson’s backing, tweeting:
Sheldon Adelson is looking
to give big dollars to Rubio because he feels he can mold him into his perfect little puppet. I agree!
As we’ve documented on LobeLog, Trump dramatically changed his message on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in particular, saying that
he would move the embassy to Jerusalem and wouldn’t call for a freeze on the construction of illegal settlements
in the West Bank, as he closed in on the nomination and sought to secure Adelson’s support for his general
support for Israel is Adelson’s “central value,” according to Newt Gingrich in 2012, when Adelson
was funding his presidential campaign’s Super PAC.
That statement is worth revisiting now as Trump weighs a policy announcement on
Jerusalem where his most generous campaign supporter is pushing for a change in U.S. policy that threatens to undermine
the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and seriously throw into question the viability of a two-state-solution.
JEW NeoCon Bill Kristol Is A Traitor
Bankrolled by Soros-Linked Leftist Billionaire
Nov 25, 2018 By
Lately, Iraq War architect and neoconservative family prince Bill Kristol has been enjoying a career second wind
as a “principled conservative” token of the left, receiving pure adulation from MSNBC liberals for denunciations
of American nationalism and the Trump administration.
It seems Kristol’s
political travel comes with a hefty financial incentive. In a report from American Greatness’ Julie Kelly, it was revealed that Kristol’s umbrella organization ‘Defending Democracy Together’ has recieved at
least $600,000 from eBay founder and progressive billionaire sugar daddy Pierre Omidyar.
Omidyar is known as a prolific funder of Democratic and progressive organizations and causes. A 2014 report of the
Media Research Center placed him on the highest tier elite liberal donors, comparable to “Michael Bloomberg, Warren
Buffett, Pierre Omidyar, Tom Steyer, and Jonathan Soros.”
is the son of the “charitable” kingpin, George Soros. Omidyar himself has donated extensively to Soros’
Open Society Foundations to the tunes of millions- meaning that Kristol, a supposed “conservative,” finds himself
financially tied to Soros.
Kristol first came to prominence in the early 2000’s
as a passionate advocate for global government, regime change and liberal internationalism. The adoption of his policy preferences
would have terrible consequences for the United States, which was sucked into a disastrous war in Iraq on their false premises.
Despite the costly human and geopolitical consequences, Kristol has never apologized or denounced his demands for war, and
claimed as late as 2015 that the United States was “right to fight in Iraq.”
None of this has prevented Kristol from taking a spotlight on the progressive left as a prominent Trump critic,
distracting from his policy record with a series of viral tweets and Russia conspiracy theories. He continues his advocacy
for war, even brazenly calling for the United States to push for regime change in China, a nation with a population of 1.35 billion people.
Walt Whitman Rostow