Rome vs. Judea;
Judea vs. Rome
. . .
Christianity, as a slave rebellion devised and led by Jews with
the aim of destroying Roman power —
ultimately, all European power —
was and is a
doctrine aimed at converting vigorous peoples into a domesticated flock of sheep.
A complete version of this essay essay appears in the 2019
of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour (pages 27-114).
For those looking for a general overview, what follows is a redaction
of an 80-page essay down to about 18 pages, edited without
or changes by John Kaminski 4/21/2019.
ROME CONTRA JUDAEA;
JUDAEA CONTRA ROME
by Evropa Soberana
for more information on Evropa Soberana, see
This is precisely why the Jews are the most disastrous people
in world history:
they have left such a falsified humanity
in their wake that even today
Christians can think of themselves
as anti-Jewish without understanding
that they are the
ultimate conclusion of Judaism.
We will also see the impossibility, in the long term, of the coexistence between
two radically different cultures, in this case, the Greco-Roman and the Jewish.
For now, the Romans will meet a people who take the tradition with the
same seriousness as them, but replacing that Olympic, artistic, athletic
aristocratic touch with a spark of fanaticism and dogmatism, and changing
the Roman patriotism for a kind of pact sealed behind the
backs of the rest of humanity.
In 56 BCE, in a speech entitled De Provinciis Consularibus given in the
Senate of Rome, Cicero himself describes the Jews, along with the Syrians as
a ‘race born to be a slave’. Syrians and Jews were ethnic communities in which
the Armenid race was strongly represented, and which are encompassed as
cultures. The Semitic waves constituted, for millennia,
source of pain, malaise, violence and tragedy for Europe, from the
Carthaginians to the Ottomans. The present book will deal particularly
the Jews, without forgetting other groups that, like the Arabs, Persians
Syrians, made common cause with them on many occasions,
including during the
rise of Christianity.
before the eyes of a Roman, was a magical and holy place where
gods, the Numens, the Manes, the Lares, the Penates, the geniuses
of folk spirits, campaigned at ease influencing the lives of the mortals
in their most daily ups and downs (the Civitas Dei of St Augustine,
attacking the Roman religion, provides valuable information about its complexity).
Despite the subsequent influence that Greece had on them, the seriousness
with which the Romans took ritualism and folklore was so extreme, and
their patriotism so incredible, that we may seriously think that fidelity
(what they called the pietas: the fulfillment of duty to the
gods in everyday tasks)
they professed to the customs and ancestral traditions,
was the secret of their immense success as a people.
From the remotest antiquity, the Jews proved to be an
and highly conflictive people,
endowed with an unprecedented ability
climb the social positions of other civilisations, undermine
their institutions and destroy their traditions and customs from a
parasitic and advantaged position; enrich themselves in the process,
take whatever was useful, become increasingly sophisticated and,
finally, survive the fall of the civilisation they devoured, taking
baggage of experience and symbols stolen
to the next
civilisation destined to suffer
the repetition of the cycle.
In all the countries that welcomed them, the Jews were accused of appropriating
the riches of others without working (usury), of exercising vampirism over the
economy, of being sycophants with the nobility and openly hostile to the people,
of indebting the States and to mortally hate, in secret, all the non-Jewish humanity.
Cicero (106-43 BCE), as we shall see later, condemns
Jewry considering that
their mentality of skulduggery and cowardice is
incompatible with the altruistic
mentality of the best in Rome. He wrote:
‘The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive
force. I know how numerous
these cliques are, how they remain united and what
power they exert through
their unions. They are a nation of liars and deceivers’.
Tacitus (56-120), the famous historian who praised the Germans, also spoke
about the Jews but in very different terms. He says that they descend from
lepers expelled from Egypt and that under the Assyrians, the Medes and Persians,
they were the most despised and humiliated people. Among the terms with
which Tacitus qualifies Jewry we have ‘perverse’, ‘abominable’, ‘cruel’,
‘alien to any law of religion’, ‘evil’
and ‘filthy’ among others.
of Abdera (around 320 BCE), not an Alexandrian himself, was
the first pagan who wrote about Jewish history, and he did not do
it on good
terms: ‘Due to a plague, the Egyptians expelled them... The majority
to uninhabited Judea, and their leader Moses established a cult different
all the others. The Jews adopted a misanthropic and inhospitable life’.
Manetho (3rd century BCE), an Egyptian priest and historian,
in his History of Egypt—
the first time someone wrote a history
of Egypt in Greek—said that at the time
of King Amenhotep, the Jews
left Heliopolis with a colony of lepers under the
command of a renegade
Osiris priest named Osarseph, whom he identifies with
Moses. Osarseph would
have taught them habits contrary to those of the
Egyptians and ordered
them not to relate to the rest of the villages, and
also made them burn and
loot numerous Egyptian villages of the
Nile valley before leaving Egypt in the
direction of Asia Minor.
of Alexandria (1st century BCE) said that Moses was a kind of
and an impostor; that his laws, equivalent to those
recorded in the Talmud,
were immoral and that the Jews had been sick:
The Jews, sick with leprosy and scurvy, took refuge in the temples,
until the king drowned
the lepers, and sent other hundred thousand
to perish in the desert. A certain Moses guided and instructed
them so that they would not show goodwill towards any person and
destroyed all the temples they found. They arrived in Judea
built a city of temple
Egyptian writer and main promoter of the pogrom of Alexandria of the
38 CE that culminated in a massacre of 50,000 Jews at the hands of the
military, said that the Jews were bound by a mutual pact
to never help any foreigner,
especially if he was Greek:
The principles of Judaism oblige to hate the rest of humanity.
Once a year they take a non-Jew, they kill him
and taste his insides,
swearing during the meal that they will hate the nation from
which the victim came. In the Holy of Holies of the sacred temple
of Jerusalem there is a golden ass head that the
The Shabbat originated because of a pelvic ailment that the Jews
contracted when fleeing from Egypt, forced them to rest on the seventh
a Greek philosopher of the 2nd century, especially known for The True Word
in which he attacked Christianity and also Judaism, wrote: ‘The Jews are
fugitives from Egypt who have never done anything of value
and were never held
in esteem or had a good reputation’.
the library of Alexandria
In 48 BCE,
while the Roman and Ptolemaic fleets were engaged in a naval battle,
event was held to further tense the relations between Jews, Greeks and Egyptians:
the burning of the library of Alexandria. Of all the ethnic groups that were
the city, none could have anything against the library. The Greeks had founded it;
the Egyptians had contributed much to it, and the Romans sincerely
this Hellenistic legacy. The Jews, however, saw in the library an
of ‘profane’ and ‘pagan’ wisdom, so that if there was a group
suspected of the first burning of the library, logically it was the
Jewish quarter or the most orthodox and fundamentalists sectors.
Josephus considers the Zealots as the fourth Jewish sect together with—from
least to greatest religious extremism—the Essenes, the Sadducees and the
Pharisees. The Zealots were the most fundamentalists of all: they refused
to pay taxes to the Roman Empire. For them, all other Jewish factions were
heretical; any Jew who collaborated minimally with the Roman
was guilty of treason and should be executed.
‘You worship what you do not know; we worship what
we do know, for salvation is from the Jews’. —
Here is the probable
cause of the unprecedented historical defamation of
this emperor: The texts
of Roman history would eventually fall into the hands
of the Christians, who
were mostly of Jewish origin and viscerally detested
the emperors. Since,
according to Orwell, ‘he who controls the past controls
Christians adulterated Roman historiography, turning the
emperors who had opposed
them and their Jewish ancestors into disturbed monsters.
Thus, we do not have a single Roman emperor who has participated in harsh
Jewish reprisals who has not been defamed by accusations of homosexuality,
cruelty or perversion. The Spanish historian José Manuel Roldán Hervás
has dismantled many of the false accusations against the historical figure of Caligula.
Nero has gone down in history as a cruel, tyrannical, perverted, capricious
emperor given to excesses, and it is really incredible the amount of
that Christians poured into his biography, to such an extent that the
of Nero is already synonymous with tyranny, caprice and depravity.
The problem of Nero, we are led to believe, is that he did not tolerate Judaism
or Christianity; and that not a few Jews and Christians found their bones in
the Colosseum, in the jaws of some lion, under the thunderous applause of
the people of Rome by his express mandate. The reality is that, in the year 64,
there is a great fire in Rome that destroys many districts and leaves the city
in a state of emergency. Nero welcomes the victims of the fire, opening the
doors of his palaces so that the people have a place to stay. In addition,
he pays from his own private funds the reconstruction of the city.
What the emperor did do was take action against the Christians. In the
words of the famous Roman historian Tacitus (55- 120), ‘Nero blamed
and inflicted the cruellest tortures on a class hated for its abominations,
called Christians by the populace’. He orders to arrest them ‘not so much
because of arsonists but because of their hatred of the human race’.
Nero, despite having shown himself to be magnanimous and generous to
the people, passed into modern history as the Antichrist, a ruthless killer
of Christians who murdered his own wife on a whim, and who for fear of
conspiracy surrounded himself with a personal guard of praetorians of
German origin—the only ones he considered sufficiently loyal. He has also
passed to the popular mind as the perpetrator of the arson in Rome while he
played the lyre, singing a song before the flames; when in real history
Nero was not even in Rome when the fire started.
Also, because he was a Jew and a Sadducee, the works of Josephus must
always be read with caution. For example, he has a writing
Against the Greeks, in which he makes apology for Judaism.
The Jewish rebellion was condemned as a kamikaze action from the beginning.
Simply, the Roman Empire was a force too irresistible, and only the fundamentalist
fanaticism, preached by minority social sectors, could drag Jewry to fight until
the end in a way so tenacious with an enemy that was the bearer of an infinitely
superior culture and, above all, of a better and more effective way of acting in
the world. Will and faith may move mountains but in this case the Jews did not
achieve miracles but the destruction of their holy
the hardening of the Roman occupation.
Vespasian had the Jews
of Judea scattered throughout Italy, Greece and,
above all, North Africa
and Asia Minor, believing that this was the end of the
Jewish danger to the
Empire. Upon returning to Rome, the triumphant
Titus solemnly rejected the
crown of laurels of victory offered by the Roman
people, claiming that
he fulfilled the divine will and that
‘there is no merit in defeating
a people that have been abandoned by their own god’.
Shortly afterward the Romans erected an arc of triumph, under which no
Jew—at least no traditionalist Jew—still passes today. The arch of Titus,
erected in Rome
to commemorate the capture of Jerusalem, shows the
Roman legionaries transporting
the fruits of the looting of the temple, highlighting the giant menorah.
This is a key moment in Jewish history. The Jews saw how their achievements
were crushed by a proud European empire, how their relics were trampled
Roman sandals and how their sacrosanct Temple was burned by flames.
To see it destroyed was a huge shock in the collective psychology of Jewry,
filling the Jews with resentment and desires for revenge against what they
knew of Europe: the Greek and Roman communities. Rome might have
been able to exterminate all the Jews of Judea if she had wanted but
not, as it seemed that the Jewish power was finished; the Jews had been
and their tribal pride shattered. Alas, far from neutralising
psychological shock on their collective unconscious fed them cruel desires for revenge.
The rebellion began in Cyrenaica, led by Lukuas, a self-proclaimed Messiah.
The Jews, in a swift stroke of hand reminiscent of their rebellion in Jerusalem
half a century earlier, attacked Greek neighbourhoods and villages, destroyed
Greek statues and temples dedicated to Jupiter, Artemis, Isis and Apollo,
and also numerous Roman official buildings. (These actions were a mere
foreshadowing of what the Christians would later
do on a massive
scale and throughout the Empire.)
Roman historian Cassius Dio, in his Roman History, describes
terrible massacre that was unleashed, referring to Lukuas as ‘Andreas’,
his Greco- Roman name. At that time, the Jews who lived in Cyrenaica,
as captain one Andreas, killed all the Greeks and Romans. They ate their
and entrails, bathed in their blood and dressed in their skins. They killed
of them with extreme cruelty, tearing them from above head down the
of their bodies; they threw some to the beasts while others forced them
fight among themselves, to such an extent that they took 220,000 to death.
Cassius Dio also tells us how from their intestines they made belts and anointed
themselves with their blood. These testimonies, although perhaps should not be
taken literally, are certainly interesting to see the negative image that
the Jews had in Europe, as an odious and misanthropic people.
After the genocide in Cyrenaica, the Lukuas masses went to an unguarded city
that had long been the world centre of wisdom and also of anti-Judaism: Alexandria.
There they set fire to numerous Greek neighbourhoods, destroyed pagan temples
and desecrated Pompey’s tomb. But this Rebellion of the Diaspora was not limited
only to North Africa. Jewish terrorism in Cyrenaica and Alexandria had emboldened
Jews throughout the Mediterranean, who, seeing the absence of Roman
felt the call of the uprising against Rome.
was already in the Persian Gulf struggling against the Parthians,
of Jews, fanaticised by the rabbis, rose up in Rhodes, Sicily, Syria,
Mesopotamia and the rest of North Africa to carry out the ethnic cleansing
the European populations. In Cyprus, the worst massacre of the entire
took place: 240,000 Europeans were massacred and the capital
of the island,
Salamis, was completely razed, according to Cassius Dio.
Something similar happened
in Egypt and on the island of Cyprus under
one Artemion, the chief of
barbarism. In Cyprus they massacred another two
hundred and forty thousand
people, so they could no longer set foot on the island.
The first Christians were exclusively Jewish blood communities, converted into
cosmopolitans with their enforced diaspora and Hellenistic contacts. To a
certain extent, these ‘Jews from the ghetto’—of which Saint Paul is the
most representative example—were despised by the most orthodox Jewish circles.
Christianity, which to expand itself took the advantage offered by the dispersion
of Semitic slaves throughout the Roman Empire, represents an Asian ebb spilled all over Europe.
Erasing traces of the Gods
At first, Sha’ul had been dedicated to persecuting Christians (which,
forget, were all Jews) in the name of the authorities of official
Judaism. At a
given moment in his life, he falls off the horse—literally,
it is said. Then,
after a great revelation, ‘Paul’ decides that Christianity
is a valid doctrine to
be preached to Gentiles, that is, to non-Jews.
With that intelligent
diplomatic skill for business and subversive movements,
numerous Christian communities in Asia
Minor and the Aegean,
from which the ‘good news’ will be
numerous preaching centres are founded in North Africa,
Syria and Palestine,
inevitably going to Greece and Rome itself. Christianity
ran like wildfire through
the most humble layers of the population of the Empire,
which were the most
ethnically orientalised layers. It then passes to the
Roman Empire through
the Jews, headed by Sha’ul/Paul, Peter and other
preachers. Its nature,
based on the sinister Syrian-Phoenician mysteries that
presupposed the sinfulness
and impurity of the being which practiced
them, is attractive to the
non-white majority: Rome’s slaves.
speeches are political cries: intelligent, virulent and fanatical
that urge the faithful to accept Jesus Christ to achieve redemption.
book of John of Patmos is a mixed incendiary formula like delirious visions
the Apocalypse, the fall of Rome or Babylon, the New Jerusalem, the
of the infidels, the arrival of the Kingdom of Heaven, the eternal
through Jesus Christ, the horrendous condemnation of pagan
all those strange oriental ideas. Another key point that must be
as very skillful by the first preachers was to take advantage of the
for the poor, the dispossessed, the abandoned, the vagabonds and
cannot help themselves; and the establishment
of institutions of charity,
relief and assistance.
glorified misfortune instead of glorifying the struggle against it;
suffering as a merit that dignifies itself and proclaimed that
anyone who behaves well. (Remember the difference:
how the pagans taught
that only fighters entered the Valhalla.)
It is the religion of the
slaves, and they willingly subscribe to it.
Christianity played a very similar role to that of the later Freemasonry:
was a Jewish strategy dressed up using weak and ambitious characters,
fascinating them with a sinister ritualism. The result was like a
communism for the Roman Empire, even favouring the ‘emancipation’
and independence of women from their husbands by capturing them with
a strange and novel Christian liturgy, and urging them to donate their own
money to the cause (a scam quite similar in its essence to the current New Age cults).
In 306, Constantine ‘The Great’ rises to power. He reigned
from 306 to 337.
This emperor was not a Christian, but his mother Helena was,
and he soon
declared himself a strong supporter of Christianity. In the year
through the Edict of Milan, ‘religious freedom’ is proclaimed
and the Christian
religion is legalised in the Roman Empire by Constantine representing
Western Empire, and Licinius representing the Oriental Empire. The Roman
Empire is in clear decadence because not only the original Romans were
debasing themselves with luxury, voluptuousness and opulence and refusing
to serve in the legions. The Christians have now infiltrated the bureaucratic elite,
and already numerous influential characters practice it and defend it.
Once legalised, the Christians begin to attack without quarter the adepts of
Hellenic culture. The Council of Ancyra of 314 denounces the cult of
Artemis (the favourite and most beloved goddess of the Spartans).
of this year provokes for the first time that hysterical populaces
begin to destroy
Greco-Roman temples, break statues and murder the priests. We
have to get
an idea of what was involved in the destruction of a Temple
in the Ancient
World. A Temple was not only a place of religious worship for
priests but a place
of meeting and reference for all the people. (In our days,
soccer stadiums or
nightclubs are minimally similar to what the Temple represented
for the people.)
To destroy it was tantamount to sabotaging their unity, destroying
the people themselves.
doubt that, at least in part, Christianity used its repugnance for
decadence to persecute any pagan cult, just as Islam today rejects
decline of Western Civilization. This was just the perfect excuse how
justified its deeds and exterminated classical culture. That
systematically persecuted with shameful excuses,
was something pure and
aristocratic: luminous Hellenism, love of gnosis,
art, philosophy, free
debate and the natural sciences. It was Egyptian, Greek
and Persian knowledge.
What Christianity was doing with its persecution
and extermination was
literally erasing the traces of the gods.
Let us not
make the mistake of blaming the Christianised Roman emperors.
ridiculous and weak men, but they were in the hands of their educators.
instructors, who respond to the type of vampiric and parasitic priest so
by Nietzsche, were the true leaders of the meticulous and massive
that was taking place. The numerous bishops and saints to whom
we have referred
were ‘cosmopolitan’ men of Jewish education, many of whom
been born in Judea, or came from essentially Jewish areas. They were
Jews who, having come in contact with their enemies, studying
and hatefully, knew how to destroy them. They had a broad
education and knew in depth the teachings of classical culture,
the Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syrian and Egyptian languages.
of an intelligence and a cunning as outstanding as their
resentment, were convinced
that they were building a new order, and that
to do so it was necessary
to erase a hundred percent every trace of
any previous civilisation,
and any thought that was not of Jewish origin.
359 CE: In the very Jewish city of Scythopolis, (province of Syria, today
corresponds to Beit She’an, in Israel), Christian leaders organise nothing
more and nothing less than a concentration camp for the adepts of classical
culture, detained throughout the empire. In this field those who profess the old beliefs,
or who simply opposed the Church, are imprisoned, tortured and executed.
Over time, Scythopolis becomes a whole infrastructure of camps, dungeons,
torture cells and execution rooms, where thousands of Hellenists would go.
The most intense horrors of the time take place here. It was the gulag
that the communism of the time used to suppress the dissidents.9
385-88 CE: Organised bands of Christian ‘paramilitary’ murderers travel
throughout the Eastern Empire to preach the ‘good news’; that is, to destroy
temples, altars and reliquaries. They destroy, among many others, the temple
of Edessa, the Kabeirion of Imbros, the temple of Zeus in Apamea, the temple
of Apollo in Didyma and all the temples of Palmyra. Thousands are arrested and
sent to the dungeons of Scythopolis, where they are imprisoned,
and killed in subhuman conditions.
the patriarch of Alexandria, initiates persecutions of the
inaugurating in Alexandria a period of real battles on the streets.
converts the temple of the god Dionysus into a church, destroys the temple
Zeus, burns the Mithraic and profanes the cult images.
The priests are humiliated
and mocked publicly before being stoned.
A new decree of Theodosius specifically prohibits looking at the
shattered statues! The persecutions of the whole empire are renewed.
Christians murder Hypatia
The protagonist of this year is Hypatia, philosopher and mathematician instructed
by her father, the also famous philosopher and mathematician Theon of Alexandria.
Hypatia’s biographers say that in the morning she spent several
physical exercise and the she took relaxing baths that helped
devote the rest of the day to the study of philosophy, music and mathematics.
Hypatia was virgin and chaste; that is, she was at the level of a priestess—a
‘a perfect human being’ just as her father had
wanted. Hypatia also ran a
philosophical school from which women were excluded.
(This is to give
thought to the feminists who have tried to use her figure in
of Alexandria during that time was Archbishop Cyril (370-444),
the aforementioned Theophilus. He had the title of patriarch, an
honour that amounted almost to that of the pope, and which
was held only
by the archbishops of Jerusalem, Alexandria and Constantinople:
the most Jewish and Christian cities of the Roman Empire. During
there was another mass rebellion; once again, street fights,
settling of scores between Christians and Hellenists followed
Archbishop Cyril had started a persecution of Alexandria scholars,
years after the library fire. This time, more radicalised, the
murdered anyone who refused to convert to the new religion.
at that time director of the museum, where she dedicated herself
to the philosophy
of Plato, was one of those people—
for which she was accused of conspiring
against the archbishop.
the accusation, friars called parabalani, fanatical monks in
of the dirty work of the archbishop and coming from the church of
Jerusalem, kidnapped her from
her carriage, beat her, stripped her and
dragged her throughout the city until
they reached the church of Caesarea.
There, at the orders of a lector named
Peter, they raped her several times
and then skinned her and ripped the flesh
with sharp oyster shells.
Hypatia died raped, skinned and bleeding in atrocious
pains. After this, they
dismembered her corpse, took her pieces through
Alexandria as trophies
and then to a place called Cinarion, where they
were burned. The archbishop
who ordered her martyrdom is remembered
by the Church as St. Cyril of Alexandria.
Only a crowd
sick with resentment and hatred, and enraged by commissaries
the art of raising slaves, could carry out this act which disgusts any
with a minimum of decency. Hypatia was the perfect victim for a
European, beautiful, healthy, wise, Hellenistic and virgin.
is what excites slaves the most when sacrificing the innocence and
of the victim. The cruelty shown, even in regard to the destruction
her body, indicates that the Christians greatly feared Hypatia and all that she represented.
We must recognise the conspiratorial astuteness and the implacable permanence
of objectives of the original Judeo-Christian nucleus! What they did was
literally turn the tables on their favour: turn Rome into anti-Rome; put at
the service of Jewry everything that the Jews so hated; take advantage of
the strength of Rome and its state apparatus, to put Rome against Rome
itself in a sinister political- spiritual jiu-jitsu—from spitted slaves, trampled,
insulted, despised and looked down, to absolute spiritual masters of the Roman Empire!
Christianity plays the vampire
In a nutshell, Christianity was a subversive movement of agitation
against Rome, against Greece and, ultimately, against
the European world.
stated, we have to assume that what has come down to us from the
world is only a tiny part of what was really there and that it
away by the Judeo-Christian destruction. Christianity, as a
rebellion devised and led by Jews with the aim of destroying
Roman power—and, ultimately, all European power—was and is a
aimed at converting vigorous peoples into a domesticated
of sheep. Nietzsche understood it perfectly, but when will we be
to fully assimilate what this meant and what it still means today?
Christianity was the vampire of the imperium Romanum — overnight
it destroyed the vast achievement of the Romans: the conquest of
the soil for a great culture that could await its time.
Can it be that this fact is not yet understood?
Paul, the Chandala hatred of Rome, of ‘the world’, in the flesh and
inspired by genius—the Jew, the eternal Jew par excellence...
What he saw was how, with the aid of the small sectarian Christian movement
that stood apart from Judaism, a ‘world conflagration’ might be kindled; how,
with the symbol of ‘God on the cross’, all secret seditions, all the fruits of
anarchistic intrigues in the empire, might be amalgamated into one immense power...
‘Salvation is of the Jews’. Christianity is the formula for
exceeding and summing
up the subterranean cults of all varieties, that
of Osiris, that of the Great Mother,
that of Mithras, for instance: in his discernment
of this fact the genius of Paul showed itself.
This was his revelation at Damascus: he grasped the fact that he needed
the belief in immortality in order to rob ‘the world’ of its value, that
the concept of ‘hell’ would master Rome, that the notion of a ‘beyond’
is the death of life... Nihilist and Christ: they rhyme, and they do more than
Israel attain, precisely with the detour of this ‘Saviour’,
of this apparent enemy against and dissolver of Israel,
the final goal of its sublime thirst for vengeance?
it part of the secret black art of a truly great politics
of revenge, a farsighted, underground, slowly expropriating, and
premeditated revenge, that Israel itself had to disown and nail
to the cross, like
some mortal enemy, the tool essential to its
revenge before all the world, so that ‘all the world’, that is, all
Israel’s enemies, could then take this particular
bait without a second thought?...
At least it is certain that sub
hoc signo Israel, with its vengeance
and transvaluation of the worth of all other previous values, has
triumphed again and again over all other ideals, over all nobler ideals.