Click on this text to watch a truthful BBC documentary titled: SACRIFICE AT PEARL HARBOR
PEARL HARBOR WAS A SET-UP
The Japanese secret communications code had been broken BEFORE the
events at Pearl Harbor.
Having already broken the Japanese
secret communications code, American military intelligence
when and from where the Japanese fleet had embarked and exactly where it was headed.
The Japanese were repeatedly insulted into
attacking the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor,
Hawaii and the U.S. top commanders allowed it to happen.
The first shocking insult to Japan was the
of Commodore Perry in Tokyo
Bay on March 31st, 1854.
Japan had been a closed, feudal, and primitively
armed society prior to the arrival of four black
painted, black smoke bellowing American
battleships armed with gigantic guns.
The Japanese were frightened and quickly deduced that they
better co-operate with
these battleship borne
Americans who wanted access to Japanese ports
and goods or else.
It was quite the wake-up call for Japan. I read
about Commodore Perry’s
in grade school, but didn’t realize the significance
of it as
Jump to 1898, when the Japanese watched their
in the Philippines being subjugated by
Americans. The Japanese knew all about the
campaign in 1901 from their
neighbors and began preparing in earnest to repel
the murderous Americans who, for all they knew,
had designs on invading Japan soon.
Americans and Europeans were swallowing up all
of the Pacific Islands and were doing
things in China such as causing an opium epidemic
(the Boxer Rebellion didn’t occur
The Hawaiians were all but killed off by European
peoples’ diseases while the Americans established
a naval base there. Hong Kong had become a
base. The Japanese thought that the
white devils must be stopped!
By 1904, the Japanese were well armed and had
built a modern navy. They even defeated Russia
a war that lasted from February 8, 1904 until
September 5, 1905. The Russians had been
on Japanese territory in hopes of
obtaining a Pacific warm water port.
By the late 1930’s, Japan, having almost no raw
materials itself, was aggressively
materials and oil from Manchuria by means of
military invasion. The U.S. was blatantly
and actually fighting on the Chinese side of that
conflict. Do you recall General Chennault
Flying Tigers mercenary air force?
On July 2, 1940,
President Roosevelt signed The
Export Act that essentially became an embargo on
fuel, oil, iron,
steel and such materials essential to
Japan’s growing military industrial complex. Japan
strangled, not to mention thoroughly insulted.
Then there is...
The McCollum Memo: The Smoking
Gun of Pearl Harbor
McCollum memo, also known as the Eight Action Memo was a memorandum, dated October 7, 1940 (more than a year before the Pearl Harbor attack), sent by Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum, who "provided the president with intelligence reports on [Japan]... [and oversaw] every intercepted and decoded Japanese
military and diplomatic report destined for the White House" in his capacity as director of the Office of Naval Intelligence's Far East Asia section. It was sent to Navy Captains Dudley Knox, who agreed with the actions described within the memo, and Walter Stratton Anderson.
The memo outlined the general situation
of several nations in World War II and recommended an eight-part course of action for the United States to take in regard to the Japanese Empire in the South Pacific, suggesting the United States provoke Japan into committing an "overt act of war". The memo illustrates several people in the Office of Naval Intelligence promoted the idea of goading Japan into war: "It is not believed that in the present state of political opinion the
United States government is capable of declaring war against Japan without more ado... If by [the elucidated eight-point
plan] Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better."
On October 7, 1940, Lieutenant
Commander Arthur McCollum of the Office of Naval Intelligence submitted a memo to Navy Captains Walter
Anderson and Dudley Knox (whose endorsement is included in the following scans). Captains Anderson
and Knox were two of President Roosevelt's most trusted military advisors.
The memo, scanned below, detailed an 8 step plan to provoke Japan into attacking
the United States. President Roosevelt, over the course of 1941, implemented all 8 of the recommendations
contained in the McCollum memo. Following the eighth provocation, Japan attacked. The public was
told that it was a complete surprise, an "intelligence failure", and America entered World
This memo, which proves that the
government of the United States desired to lure Japan into an attack, was declassified in 1994.
It took fifty years for the truth about Pearl Harbor to be revealed. Will we have to wait that long
for the truth of 9-11 to come out?
More about the Pearl Harbor Deception
is at Pearl Harbor: Mother of all conspiracies (at least until 9/11)
THE BONES OF STATION H The remains of the radio intercept station on Oahu that picked up Admiral Yamamoto's order for the attack.
YOUTUBE - THE BONES OF STATION H Video of the remains of the radio intercept station on Oahu that picked up Admiral Yamamoto's order for the
0p-16-F-2 ON1 7 October 1940
Memorandum for the Director
Subject: Estimate of the Situation in the Pacific and
Recommendations for Action by the United States.
1. The United States today finds herself confronted
by a hostile Germany and Italy in Europe and by an equally
hostile Japan in the Orient.
Russia, the great land link between
these two groups of hostile powers, is at present
in all probability favorably inclined towards the Axis powers,
and her favorable
attitude towards these powers may be expected
to increase in direct proportion to increasing
success in their
prosecution of the war in Europe. Germany and Italy have been
successful in war on the continent of Europe and all of Europe
is either under their military
control or has been forced into
subservience. Only the British Empire is actively opposing
war the growing world dominance of Germany and Italy and their
2. The United States at first remained coolly aloof
conflict in Europe and there is considerable evidence
to support the view that Germany and
Italy attempted by every
method within their power to foster a continuation of American
indifference to the outcome of the struggle in Europe. Paradoxically,
every success of German and Italian
arms has led to further
increases in United States sympathy for and material support of
the British Empire, until at the present time the United States
government stands committed to a policy
of rendering every
support short of war the changes rapidly increasing that
States will become a full fledged ally of the British
Empire in the very near future. The final failure
and Italian diplomacy to keep the United States in the role of
spectator has forced them to adopt the policy of
developing threats to U.S. security in other spheres
of the world,
notably by the threat of revolutions in South and Central America
by Axis-dominated groups and by the stimulation of Japan to further
aggressions and threats in the Far
East in the hope that by these
mean the Unites States would become so confused in thought
and fearful of her own immediate security as to cause her to
become so preoccupied in purely
defensive preparations as to
virtually preclude U.S. aid to Great Britain in any form. As a
result of this policy, Germany and Italy have lately concluded
a military alliance with Japan
directed against the United States
If the published terms of this treaty and the pointed
utterances of German, Italian and Japanese leaders can be believed,
and there seems no ground on which
to doubt either, the three
totalitarian powers agree to make war on the United States,
should she come to the assistance of England, or should she
attempt to forcibly interfere with Japan's
aims in the Orient and,
furthermore, Germany and Italy expressly reserve the right to
determine whether American aid to Britain, short of war, is a
cause for war or not after they have succeeded
England. In other words, after England has been disposed of
will decide whether or not to immediately proceed
with an attack on the United States. Due to geographic
neither Germany nor Italy are in a position to offer any
material aid to Japan. Japan,
on the contrary, can be of much
help to both Germany and Italy by threatening and possibly even
attacking British dominions and supply routes from Australia,
India and the Dutch East Indies,
thus materially weakening
Britain's position in opposition to the Axis powers in Europe.
In exchange for this service, Japan receives a free hand to seize
all of Asia that she can
find it possible to grab, with the
added promise that Germany and Italy will do all in their
to keep U.S. attention so attracted as to prevent the United
States from taking
positive aggressive action against Japan.
Here again we have another example of the Axis-Japanese
diplomacy which is aimed at keeping American power immobilized,
and by threats and alarms
to so confuse American thought as to
preclude prompt decisive action by the United States in
sphere of action. It cannot be emphasized to strongly that
the last thing desired
by either the Axis powers in Europe
or by Japan in the Far East is prompt, warlike action by
United States in either theatre of operations.
An examination of the situation in Europe leads
to the conclusion that there is little that we can
immediately to help Britain that is not already being done.
We have no
trained army to send to the assistance of England,
nor will we have for at least a year. We are now
increase the flow of materials to England and to bolster the
of England in every practicable way and this aid will
undoubtedly be increased. On the other hand, there
that Germany or Italy can do against us as long as England
in the war and her navy maintains control of the
Atlantic. The one danger to our position lies in the
early defeat of the British Empire with the British Fleet falling
into the hands of the Axis powers. The possibility of
such an event occurring would be materially lessened
actually allied in war with the British or at the very least
active measures to relieve the pressure on Britain
in other spheres of action. To sum up: the threat
to our security
in the Atlantic remains small so long as the British Fleet
dominant in that ocean and friendly to the United States.
In the Pacific, Japan by virtue of her alliance
with Germany and Italy is a definite threat to the
of the British Empire and once the British Empire is gone the
Japan-Germany and Italy is to be directed against the
United States. A powerful land attack by Germany
through the Balkans and North Africa against the Suez Canal
with a Japanese
threat or attack on Singapore would have very
serious results for the British Empire. Could Japan be
or neutralized, the fruits of a successful attack on the Suez
not be as far reaching and beneficial to the Axis
powers as if such a success was also accompanied by
elimination of British sea power from the Indian Ocean, thus
opening up a European supply route for Japan and a sea route for
Eastern raw materials to reach
Germany and Italy, Japan must be
diverted if the British and American ( ) blockade of Europe
and possibly Japan (?) is to remain even partially in effect.
5. While as pointed out in Paragraph (3) there is
little that the United States can
do to immediately retrieve
the situation in Europe, the United States is able to effectively
nullify Japanese aggressive action, and do it without lessening
U.S. material assistance
to Great Britain.
6. An examination of Japan's present
opposed to the United States reveals a situation as follows:
1. Geographically strong position 1. A million and a half men
Islands. engaged in an exhausting war
on the Asiatic Continent.
2. A highly centralized strong 2. Domestic economy and food
supply severely straightened.
3. Rigid control of economy
on 3. A serious lack of sources of
a war basis. raw materials for war. Notably
4. A people inured to hardship
4. Totally cut off from supplies
and war. from Europe.
5. A powerful army. 5. Dependent upon distant overseas
routes for essential supplies.
6. A skillful navy about 2/3 6. Incapable of increasing
the strength of the U.S. Navy. manufacture and supply of war
materials without free access
to U.S. or European markets.
stocks of raw materials. 7. Major cities and industrial
centers extremely vulnerable
to air attack.
8. Weather until April rendering
direct sea operations in the
vicinity of Japan difficult.
7. In the Pacific the United States possesses a very strong
and a navy and naval air force at present
in that ocean capable of long distance offensive operation.
are certain other factors which at the present time are strongly
in our favor, viz:
A. Philippine Islands still held by the United States.
B. Friendly and possibly allied government in control
of the Dutch East Indies.
still hold Hong Kong and Singapore and
are favorable to us.
D. Important Chinese armies are still in the field
in China against Japan.
E. A small U.S. Naval Force capable of seriously
threatening Japan's southern supply routes
already in the theatre of operations.
F. A considerable Dutch naval force is in the
Orient that would be
of value if allied to U.S.
8. A consideration of the foregoing
leads to the
conclusion that prompt aggressive naval action against Japan by
States would render Japan incapable of affording any
help to Germany and Italy in their attack on England
Japan itself would be faced with a situation in which her navy
be forced to fight on most unfavorable terms or accept
fairly early collapse of the country through
the force of blockade.
A prompt and early declaration of war after entering into suitable
arrangements with England and Holland, would be most effective
in bringing about the early
collapse of Japan and thus eliminating
our enemy in the pacific before Germany and Italy could
at us effectively. Furthermore, elimination of Japan must surely
Britain's position against Germany and Italy and, in
addition, such action would increase the confidence
of all nations who tend to be friendly towards us.
9. It is not believed that in the present state of
political opinion the United
States government is capable of
declaring war against Japan without more ado; and it is barely
possible that vigorous action on our part might lead the
Japanese to modify their attitude. Therefore,
course of action is suggested:
Make an arrangement with Britain for the use of
British bases in the Pacific, particularly
B. Make an arrangement with Holland for the use of
base facilities and acquisition of supplies
in the Dutch East Indies.
C. Give all possible aid to the Chinese government
D. Send a division of long range heavy cruisers to
the Orient, Philippines, or Singapore.
Send two divisions of submarines to the Orient.
Keep the main strength of the U.S. fleet now in
the Pacific in the vicinity of the Hawaiian Islands.
G. Insist that the Dutch refuse to grant Japanese
demands for undue economic concessions,
H. Completely embargo all U.S. trade with Japan,
in collaboration with a similar
by the British Empire.
If by these means Japan could be led to commit an
overt act of war, so much the better. At all events we
must be fully
prepared to accept the threat of war.
A. H. McCollum
0p-16-F-2 ON1 7 October 1940
1. The United
States is faced by a hostile combination of
powers in both the Atlantic and Pacific.
2. British naval control of the Atlantic prevents hostile
action against the United States in this area.
Japan's growing hostility presents an attempt to open sea
communications between Japan and
the Mediterranean by an
attack on the British lines of communication in the
4. Japan must be diverted if British opposition
in Europe is
to remain effective.
The United States naval forces now in the Pacific are
capable of so containing and harassing Japan as to
her assistance to Germany and Italy.
It is to the interest of the United States to eliminate
Japan's threat in the Pacific at the earliest
by taking prompt and aggressive action against Japan.
7. In the absence of United States ability to take the
political offensive, additional
naval force should be
sent to the orient and agreements entered into with Holland
England that would serve as an effective check against
Japanese encroachments in South-eastern Asia.
Comment by Captain Knox
It is unquestionably to out general interest
that Britain be
not licked - just now she has a stalemate
and probably cant do better. We ought to make it certain
that she at least gets a stalemate. For this she will probably
need from us substantial further
destroyers and air reinforcements
to England. We should not precipitate anything in the
Orient that should hamper our ability to do this - so long as
If England remains stable, Japan will be cautious
in the Orient. Hence
our assistance to England in the Atlantic
is also protection to her and us in the Orient.
However, I concur in your courses of action
we must be ready on both sides
and probably strong enough
to care for both.
Re your #6:
- no reason for battleships not
visiting west coast in bunches.
The last economic warfare insult was the freezing
of all Japanese assets in the
U.S. in July of 1941.
By then the Japanese had had enough and began
planning and preparing for
a war with the
imperialist U.S.A. who was calling Japan an
When the entire Japanese battle fleet, including six
and 408 aircraft, embarked from
northern Japan on November 26th, 1941, every
Japanese sailor and
pilot thought they were headed
for a brutal stand-up fight. Japanese Samurai code
holds that there
is no honor in killing a sleeping
enemy. With few exceptions, Japanese military
officers of higher rank
The Japanese secret communications code
been broken BEFORE the events at Pearl
Harbor. Even the 1944 Republican presidential
Thomas E. Dewey, knew about this
explosive information, having heard it in the
from Joint Chief of Staff
George C. Marshall. Dewey could have used it to
demonize incumbent President
would have surely won the election. Dewey
honorably chose not to do so in a time of war.
Having already broken the Japanese secret
communications code, American military
intelligence knew when and from where the
Japanese fleet had embarked and exactly where it
U.S. Navy Admiral Kimmel and U.S.
Army General Short, who were the commanders of
the U.S. military assets
at Pearl Harbor, were
purposely not informed of the Japanese fleets’
All of the vitally important American aircraft
carriers were sent out to “probe the open sea”
during this time without escort. All of the carrier
ships were lined up at Pearl Harbor like
ducks in a row.
The Army aircraft at Hickam Field
were also clustered up along the flight line like
ducks in a row as a
hedge against saboteurs.
Locking them in hangars with posted sentries
might have worked better against
that was really the plan.
On the morning of December
7th, 1941, two
Japanese reconnaissance aircraft were launched
from a carrier to scout the composition and
of the American fleet. The Japanese pilots
had volunteered for this probable suicide mission.
at will over Oahu, somehow without
being detected, and reported the bad news that the
carriers were not
A U.S. destroyer, the U.S.S. Ward, sank a
midget submarine near the entrance to
Pearl Harbor before the attack but U.S. Naval
headquarters required confirmation.
The skipper of
the Ward was extremely frustrated that his word
was not enough confirmation.
So we did strike the
first blow of the Pacific
war after all!
The new radar installation at Opana Point, Hawaii
detected the Japanese battle fleet approaching but
H-Q advised the operators to “forget about it.”
radar crew shut down and took the day off. Head
figured, incorrectly of course, that what
the radar crew detected was a flight of expected
which was classified information.
Watch "Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor" https://youtu.be/7p1TOA99S88
via the link that is at for the top of this page for
whole convoluted story of events
America got its ass kicked in the so
called sneak attack, so a new Navy in the Pacific
theatre was now
needed to replace the obsolete and
seriously damaged one. Roosevelt got his war, and
a hoodwinked America
was up in arms and eager
to be fed into the meat grinder.
Admiral Isoru Yamamoto put it
succinctly after the attack when he declared, “I fear
have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and
fill him with a terrible resolve.” This is an odd
thing for a victorious commander to say.
extremely depressed thereafter.
He knew Japan had been suckered into appearing
to be the sneaky cheap-shot
BTW: I saw the documentary, "Sacrifice at Pearl
Harbor", on the History Channel somewhere
around 1996 or 1997, and was amazed that they
be revealing the truth about Pearl Harbor
with so many World War II veterans still living.
Then sure enough, "Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor" was
removed from the programming
and replaced with
a typical disinformation program called, "Pearl
Harbor: The Untold Story",
that was a total
Presently, Jewess Abbe
Raven (Ravnitsky) is the
President, CEO and gatekeeper to historical
information, such as the truth about 9/11,
presented on the Arts & Entertainment Network
that carries the History Channel shows.
TEXT OF HIROHITO'S WAR DECLARATION
By the grace of heaven, Emperor of Japan, seated
on the throne occupied by the same dynasty from time immemorial, enjoin upon ye, our loyal
and brave subjects:
We hereby declare war upon the United States
of America and the British Empire. The men and officers of our Army and Navy shall do their
utmost in prosecuting the war. Our public servants of various departments shall perform faithfully
and diligently their respective duties; the entire nation with a united will shall mobilize their total strength so
that nothing will miscarry in the attainment of our war aims.
ensure the stability of East Asia, and to contribute to world peace is the farsighted policy
which was formulated by our great illustrious Imperial Grandsire and our Great Imperial Sire
succeeding him and which we lay constantly to heart. To cultivate friendship among nations
and to enjoy prosperity in common with all nations, has always been the guiding principle
of our Empire's foreign policy. It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has
been brought to cross swords with America and Britain. More than four years have passed since China, failing to
comprehend the true intentions of our Empire, and recklessly courting trouble, disturbed
the peace of East Asia and compelled our Empire to take up arms. Although there has been
reestablished the National Government of China, with which Japan had effected neighborly
intercourse and cooperation, the regime which has survived in Chungking, relying upon American and British protection,
still continues its fratricidal opposition.
for the realization of their inordinate ambition to dominate the Orient, both America and
Britain, giving support to the Chungking regime, have aggravated the disturbances in East Asia.
Moreover these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military preparations on all sides
of our Empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every means our peaceful
commerce and finally resorted to a direct severance of economic relations, menacing greatly
the existence of our Empire.
Patiently have we waited and long have
we endured, in the hope that our Government might retrieve the situation in peace. But our adversaries, showing
not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a settlement; and in the meantime
they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel our Empire to submission.
This trend of affairs, would, if left unchecked, not only nullify our Empire's efforts
of many years for the sake of the stabilization of East Asia, but also endanger the very existence of
our nation. The situation being such as it is, our Empire, for its existence and self defense has no other recourse
but to appeal to arms and to crush every obstacle in its path.
hallowed spirits of our Imperial Ancestors, guarding us from above, we rely upon the loyalty
and courage of our subjects in the confident expectation that the task bequeathed by our
forefathers will be carried forward, and that the sources of evil will be speedily eradicated, and
an enduring peace be established in East Asia, preserving thereby the glory of our Empire."
December 8, 1941
Who Involved the U.S. in WWII When 83% of Americans Voted Against It? JEWS OF COURSE...!
– the unofficial President of America.
Judge Samuel Roseman – the
Founder and Head of the ‘Brains-Trust’ – Roosevelts “Advisors”
Professor Raymond Moley – Favorite Presidential Advisor.
Stephan Wise (Weiz) – President of the WJC and Roosevelts closest Advisor/Firm Hand
– see here:
Jewish Plan for WWII and all the Benefits it would Bring World Jewry
Morgenthau Sr. – Unofficial Advisor, Secretary of the Treasury, Jewish State Lawyer.
N. Kaufman – President of the ‘American Federation of Peace’ / Author of ‘Germany
to the Morgenthau Plan – see: Germany Must Perish located in the navagation bars at this website
Harry Dexter White (Weit) –
Senior U.S. Treasury department official (Transport of U.S. printing plates to Bolsheviks –
see: WWII: Espionage and the US funding
of the Conquering Communists of Europe
Felix Frankfurter – Supreme Court
Justice Benjamin Cardozo – Presidential Advisor.
Shwope – Presidential Advisor.
E. A. Filene – Presidential Advisor.
Taussig – Brain -Trust Advisor.
Nathan Margold – Interior Department
Charles Wyzanski Jr. – Labour Department Solicitor.
Leo Wolman – Labour Strike Board.
Rose Schneiderman – Labour
Isador Lubin Jr. – Labour Bureau Statistician.
Rosenblatt – Amusement Administrator.
E. A. Goldenweiser – Federal
Jerome Frank – General Councel.
– Economic Advisor (Co-author of A.A.A. Laws).
Herbert Feis – “The Brains
of the State Department.”
Henry Morgenthau Jr. – Secretary of the Treasury.
Lilienthal – TVA Director.
Sidney Hillman – Labour Advisory
L. N. Landau – PWA General Solicitor.
A. Steinhard –
Minister to Sweden.
Professor Albert E. Taussig – NRA Advisor.
Sachs – NRA Code Authority.
Maurice Karp – NRA Director of Personnel.
Robert Freshner – CC C Forest Army Head.
Robert Strauss – NRA
Donald Richberg – NRA Advisor.
H. I. Strauss
– Ambassador to France.
Ferdinand Pecora – “Special” Investigator.
Samuel Untermayer – Stock-Exchange Bill Advisor.
Professor James M.
Landis – Federal Trade Commissioner…
Just to name a few of the “Trustworthy
Men” (JEWS) involved in American interests.
Besides the Pearl Harbour
False Flag, How did They Manipulate America into WWII? – A war 83% of Americans (according to the
June 3rd, 1941, Gallup Poll results) were against and asserted they wished to remain uninvolved?
Protocol of the Elders of Zion – VII:6
“…In a word, to sum up our system
of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist
attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with
the guns of America or China or Japan"….
“We Jews,” as the spokesmen
of this clannish nationalism might put it, “are well aware that in America, England, France and the
Soviet Union, as well as in every other part of the world, the rule is: Judah must come first!"
As long as the interests of America are identical with the interests of Old Testament ‘Nazism’,
we will be good Americans, but as soon as our interests begin to conflict with the interests of America,
we shall betray her too. Generally speaking, democracy suits us if and when it is led by as many Jews as possible.
The so-called freedom of the press is good for us too, provided the descendants of the seed of Abraham,
above all, can avail themselves of it. Yes! this freedom is a valuable thing, but only where we Jews
are at liberty to do anything we like!”
Oh, you faint-hearted ones, who listen terror-stricken
to the marching S.A. and S.S. troops; be not afraid! By now we are experts in undermining and capturing
democracies. We are familiar with the methods of imposing our particular interests on the masses. America,
the richest state of the Goyim is being shaken by mortal economic crisis. The time is ripe to start our
all-out offensive, which, will also give political power into our hands. And ours will be a take-over of a more permanent
character than that of Hitler. We are going to conquer America neither by arms nor by theories. We possess
a reliable prescription to call down Nemesis on America. The fate of America was prescribed by our own
Führer – Moses! Torah is our Mein Kampf!
This will be the year for sounding the
Trumpets in America, where in Washington’s time, the total number of Jews were a mere four thousand.
But now our bankers, our socialists and our journalists will be blowing trumpets and, our ‘Brain-Trust’
will execute the New Deal at the expense of the American Pioneer-Population. Thereafter, the only remaining
question will be: Whom are we going to put in the Presidential Chair at Washington?
of you living in despair in your palatial residence in Wall Street or in 13th Street, as well as in the
ghettos of Brooklyn and Bronx, must not doubt that we shall find our man, who will be a real match for
Hitler, while at the same time, place political power over America into our hands. You need only read
our directions in the Protocols.”
(The World Conquerors, p. 80-81)
“Liberalism produced constitutional status, which took the place of what was
the only safeguard of the Goyim, namely despotism (autocracy)… then it was that we replaced the Ruler
by a caricature of a government – by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet
overture – our slaves. In the near future we shall establish elections, in favour of such presidents,
as have in their past some dark undiscovered stain, some “Panama” or other – then they
will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans, out of fear of revelations…”
“Who will therefore, be the new President, who will place America in our hands and will execute our
His name is Franklin D. Roosevelt! – the late descendant of the Spanish Sephardim.
Fear not dear Franklin, our “Advisors” are now gathering around you, to support you in the
decision making for all your future endeavours, which is at such a pivotal time in our world history. Felix Frankfurter
from Vienna, Henry Morgenthau from Mannheim, Bernard Baruch from Könoigsberg and Albert Einstein
from Berlin. Samuel Roseman who will write your speeches is there, so are our labour leaders; amongst
them our compatriot Sidney Hillman who controls American labour in the Administration for you. There
is David Dubinsky, also a fellow immigrant from Russia, who will transform the Christian workers into
tax payers for Zionism.
The entourage we will provide you will consist exclusively of trustworthy
men, such as La Guardia, Mayor of New York, a Jew from Fiume and, Alger Hiss, the protègè
of Frankfurter and of Senator Lehman. Bernard Baruch will control the 351 most important branches of American
industry, which will militarily equip the American boys to go fight against our cryptonite – National
On behalf of America, Alger Hiss will conduct the talks with Stalin and, Einstein,
Oppenheimer and David Lilienthal will produce the atomic bomb. As managers of the UNNRA, La Guardia and
Herbert Lehman will help the intended future Jewish ‘Displaced Persons‘ of our coming war
– a war which we will declare. Our appointed Henry Morgenthau Jr., Secretaty of the Treasury, will prepare
a splendid plan for the extermination of the German people, based on the insightful authorship of our
intellectual confidant, President of the ‘American Federation of Peace,’ Theodore Kaufman. Our own
Mortiz Gomberg, will see to it that 18 million people from the countries of our opponent will become
‘Stateless’ in Europe, our trustworthy men will distribute $11 million worth of cheques to
provide our Bolshevik counterparts with arms and Harry Dexter White will also give them U.S. occupation
printing plates, to enable the ‘Displaced Persons’ to print with abandon, so they can be cashed-up
to usurp all positions of European “Authority” after our boys summarily assassinate all
who have opposed us – at the expense of the American people who reject involvement in our coming
No, fear not dear Franklin, the patriotism of this American dream to sail across the seas to punish
OUR enemies, is in the good and trustworthy hands of Judah!
Conspired to Start World War II in Europe
We Elected Their Nemesis ... But He Was Ours
historians claim that U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt never wanted war and made every reasonable effort to prevent
war. This article will show that contrary to what establishment historians claim, Franklin Roosevelt and his administration
wanted war and made every effort to instigate World War II in Europe.
THE SECRET POLISH DOCUMENTS
The Germans seized a mass of documents from the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs when they
invaded Warsaw in late September 1939. The documents were seized when a German SS brigade led by Freiherr von Kuensberg
captured the center of Warsaw ahead of the regular German army. Von Kuensberg’s men took control of the Polish Foreign
Ministry just as Ministry officials were in the process of burning incriminating documents. These documents clearly establish
Roosevelt’s crucial role in planning and instigating World War II. They also reveal the forces behind President Roosevelt
that pushed for war.
Some of the secret Polish
documents were first published in the United States as The German White Paper. Probably the most-revealing document
in the collection is a secret report dated January 12, 1939 by Jerzy Potocki, the Polish ambassador to the United States.
This report discusses the domestic situation in the United States. I quote (a translation of) Ambassador Potocki’s
report in full:
is a feeling now prevalent in the United States marked by growing hatred of Fascism, and above all of Chancellor Hitler and
everything connected with National Socialism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100% [of
the] radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black
as possible--above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited--this propaganda is nevertheless extremely
effective since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe.
At the present moment most Americans regard Chancellor Hitler and National Socialism as the greatest evil
and greatest peril threatening the world. The situation here provides an excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds,
for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia who with a great many words and with most various calumnies incite the public.
They praise American liberty which they contrast with the totalitarian states.
is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which is conducted above all against National Socialism,
Soviet Russia is almost completely eliminated. Soviet Russia, if mentioned at all, is mentioned in a friendly manner and
things are presented in such a way that it would seem that the Soviet Union were cooperating with the bloc of democratic
states. Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathies of the American public are completely on the side of Red Spain.
This propaganda, this war psychosis is being artificially created. The American people are told that peace
in Europe is hanging only by a thread and that war is inevitable. At the same time the American people are unequivocally
told that in case of a world war, America also must take an active part in order to defend the slogans of liberty and democracy
in the world. President Roosevelt was the first one to express hatred against Fascism. In doing so he was serving a double
purpose; first he wanted to divert the attention of the American people from difficult and intricate domestic problems,
especially from the problem of the struggle between capital and labor. Second, by creating a war psychosis and by spreading
rumors concerning dangers threatening Europe, he wanted to induce the American people to accept an enormous armament program
which far exceeds United States defense requirements.
Regarding the first point,
it must be said that the internal situation on the labor market is growing worse constantly. The unemployed today already
number 12 million. Federal and state expenditures are increasing daily. Only the huge sums, running into billions, which
the treasury expends for emergency labor projects, are keeping a certain amount of peace in the country. Thus far only the
usual strikes and local unrest have taken place. But how long this government aid can be kept up it is difficult to predict
today. The excitement and indignation of public opinion, and the serious conflict between private enterprises and enormous
trusts on the one hand, and with labor on the other, have made many enemies for Roosevelt and are causing him many sleepless
As to point two, I can only say that President Roosevelt, as a clever
player of politics and a connoisseur of American mentality, speedily steered public attention away from the domestic situation
in order to fasten it on foreign policy. The way to achieve this was simple. One needed, on the one hand, to enhance the
war menace overhanging the world on account of Chancellor Hitler, and, on the other hand, to create a specter by talking
about the attack of the totalitarian states on the United States. The Munich pact came to President Roosevelt as a godsend.
He described it as the capitulation of France and England to bellicose German militarism. As was said here: Hitler compelled
Chamberlain at pistol-point. Hence, France and England had no choice and had to conclude a shameful peace.
The prevalent hatred against everything which is in any way connected with German National Socialism is
further kindled by the brutal attitude against the Jews in Germany and by the émigré problem. In this action
Jewish intellectuals participated; for instance, Bernard Baruch; the Governor of New York State, Lehman; the newly appointed
judge of the Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter; Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau, and others who are personal friends
of Roosevelt. They want the President to become the champion of human rights, freedom of religion and speech, and the man
who in the future will punish trouble-mongers. These groups, people who want to pose as representatives of “Americanism”
and “defenders of democracy” in the last analysis, are connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.
For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the interests of its race, to put the
President of the United States at this “ideal” post of champion of human rights, was a clever move. In this
manner they created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile
camps. The entire issue is worked out in a mysterious manner. Roosevelt has been forcing the foundation for vitalizing American
foreign policy, and simultaneously has been procuring enormous stocks for the coming war, for which the Jews are striving
consciously. With regard to domestic policy, it is extremely convenient to divert public attention from anti-Semitism which
is ever growing in the United States, by talking about the necessity of defending faith and individual liberty against the
onslaught of Fascism.
On January 16, 1939,
Potocki reported to the Warsaw Foreign Ministry a conversation he had with American Ambassador to France William Bullitt.
Bullitt was in Washington on a leave of absence from Paris. Potocki reported that Bullitt stated the main objectives of
the Roosevelt administration were:
1. The vitalizing foreign policy, under the leadership of President Roosevelt, severely and unambiguously
condemns totalitarian countries.
2. The United States preparation for war
on sea, land and air which will be carried out at an accelerated speed and will consume the colossal sum of $1,250 million.
3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain must put [an] end to any
sort of compromise with the totalitarian countries. They must not let themselves in for any discussions aiming at any kind
of territorial changes.
4. They have the moral assurance that the United
States will leave the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the side of Britain and France in case
of war. America is ready to place its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.”
Juliusz (Jules) Łukasiewicz,
the Polish ambassador to France, sent a top-secret report from Paris to the Polish Foreign Ministry at the beginning of
February 1939. This report outlined the U.S. policy toward Europe as explained to him by William Bullitt:
A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, W. Bullitt,
returned to Paris after having spent three months holiday in America. Meanwhile, I had two conversations with him which
enable me to inform Monsieur Minister on his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of Washington’s
The international situation is regarded by official quarters as
extremely serious and being in danger of armed conflict. Competent quarters are of the opinion that if war should break
out between Britain and France on the one hand and Germany and Italy on the other, and Britain and France should be defeated,
the Germans would become dangerous to the realistic interests of the United States on the American continent. For this reason,
one can foresee right from the beginning the participation of the United States in the war on the side of France and Britain,
naturally after some time had elapsed after the beginning of the war. Ambassador Bullitt expressed this as follows: “Should
war break out we shall certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall end it.”
On March 7, 1939,
Ambassador Potocki sent another remarkably perceptive report on Roosevelt’s foreign policy to the Polish government.
I quote Potocki’s report in full:
The foreign policy of the United States right now concerns not only the government, but the entire American
public as well. The most important elements are the public statements of President Roosevelt. In almost every public speech
he refers more or less explicitly to the necessity of activating foreign policy against the chaos of views and ideologies
in Europe. These statements are picked up by the press and then cleverly filtered into the minds of average Americans in
such a way as to strengthen their already formed opinions. The same theme is constantly repeated, namely, the danger of
war in Europe and saving the democracies from inundation by enemy fascism. In all of these public statements there is normally
only a single theme, that is, the danger from Nazism and Nazi Germany to world peace.
a result of these speeches, the public is called upon to support rearmament and the spending of enormous sums for the navy
and the air force. The unmistakable idea behind this is that in case of an armed conflict the United States cannot stay
out but must take an active part in the maneuvers. As a result of the effective speeches of President Roosevelt, which are
supported by the press, the American public is today being conscientiously manipulated to hate everything that smacks of
totalitarianism and fascism. But it is interesting that the USSR is not included in all of this. The American public considers
Russia more in the camp of the democratic states. This was also the case during the Spanish civil war when the so-called
Loyalists were regarded as defenders of the democratic idea.
The State Department
operates without attracting a great deal of attention, although it is known that Secretary of State [Cordell] Hull and President
Roosevelt swear allegiance to the same ideas. However, Hull shows more reserve than Roosevelt, and he loves to make a distinction
between Nazism and Chancellor Hitler on the one hand, and the German people on the other. He considers this form of dictatorial
government a temporary “necessary evil.” In contrast, the State Department is unbelievably interested in the
USSR and its internal situation and openly worries itself over its weaknesses and decline. The main reason for the United
States interest in the Russians is the situation in the Far East. The current government would be glad to see the Red Army
emerge as the victor in a conflict with Japan. That’s why the sympathies of the government are clearly on the side
of China, which recently received considerable financial aid amounting to 25 million dollars.
Eager attention is given to all information from the diplomatic posts as well as to the special emissaries of the
President who serve as ambassadors of the United States. The President frequently calls his representatives from abroad
to Washington for personal exchanges of views and to give them special information and instructions. The arrival of the
envoys and ambassadors is always shrouded in secrecy and very little surfaces in the press about the results of their visits.
The State Department also takes care to avoid giving out any kind of information about the course of these interviews. The
practical way in which the President makes foreign policy is most effective. He gives personal instructions to his representatives
abroad, most of whom are his personal friends. In this way the United States is led down a dangerous path in world politics
with the explicit intention of abandoning the comfortable policy of isolation. The President regards the foreign policy
of his country as a means of satisfying his own personal ambition. He listens carefully and happily to his echo in the other
capitals of the world. In domestic as well as foreign policy, the Congress of the United States is the only object that stands
in the way of the President and his government in carrying out his decisions quickly and ambitiously. One hundred and fifty
years ago, the Constitution of the United States gave the highest prerogatives to the American parliament which may criticize
or reject the law of the White House.
The foreign policy of President Roosevelt
has recently been the subject of intense discussion in the lower house and in the Senate, and this has caused excitement.
The so-called Isolationists, of whom there are many in both houses, have come out strongly against the President. The representatives
and the senators were especially upset over the remarks of the President, which were published in the press, in which he
said that the borders of the United States lie on the Rhine. But President Roosevelt is a superb political player and understands
completely the power of the American parliament. He has his own people there, and he knows how to withdraw from an uncomfortable
situation at the right moment.
Very intelligently and cleverly he ties together
the question of foreign policy with the issues of American rearmament. He particularly stresses the necessity of spending
enormous sums in order to maintain a defensive peace. He says specifically that the United States is not arming in order
to intervene or to go to the aid of England or France in case of war, but because of the need to show strength and military
preparedness in case of an armed conflict in Europe. In his view this conflict is becoming ever more acute and is completely
Since the issue is presented this way, the houses of Congress have
no cause to object. To the contrary, the houses accepted an armament program of more than 1 billion dollars. (The normal
budget is 550 million, the emergency 552 million dollars). However, under the cloak of a rearmament policy, President Roosevelt
continues to push forward his foreign policy, which unofficially shows the world that in case of war the United States will
come out on the side of the democratic states with all military and financial power.
conclusion it can be said that the technical and moral preparation of the American people for participation in a war--if
one should break out in Europe--is proceeding rapidly. It appears that the United States will come to the aid of France
and Great Britain with all its resources right from the beginning. However, I know the American public and the representatives
and senators who all have the final word, and I am of the opinion that the possibility that America will enter the war as
in 1917 is not great. That’s because the majority of the states in the mid-West and West, where the rural element
predominates, want to avoid involvement in European disputes at all costs. They remember the declaration of the Versailles
Treaty and the well-known phrase that the war was to save the world for democracy. Neither the Versailles Treaty nor that
slogan have reconciled the United States to that war. For millions there remains only a bitter aftertaste because of unpaid
billions which the European states still owe America.
These secret Polish reports
were written by top-level Polish ambassadors who were not necessarily friendly to Germany. However, they understood the
realities of European politics far better than people who made foreign policy in the United States. The Polish ambassadors
realized that behind all of their rhetoric about democracy and human rights, the Jewish leaders in the United States who
agitated for war against Germany were deceptively advancing their own interests.
There is no question that the secret documents taken from the Polish Foreign
Ministry in Warsaw are authentic. Charles C. Tansill considered the documents genuine and stated, “Some months ago
I had a long conversation with M. Lipsky, the Polish ambassador in Berlin in the prewar years, and he assured me that the
documents in the German White Paper are authentic.”
William H. Chamberlain wrote,
“I have been privately informed by an extremely reliable source that Potocki, now residing in South America, confirmed
the accuracy of the documents, so far as he was concerned.” Historian Harry Elmer Barnes also stated, “Both Professor Tansill and myself have independently established the thorough
authenticity of these documents.”
Edward Raczyński, the
Polish ambassador to London from 1934 to 1945, confirmed in his diary the authenticity of the Polish documents. He wrote
in his entry on June 20, 1940: “The Germans published in April a White Book containing documents from the archives
of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs, consisting of reports from Potocki from Washington, Łukasiewicz in Paris and myself.
I do not know where they found them, since we were told that the archives had been destroyed. The documents are certainly
genuine, and the facsimiles show that for the most part the Germans got hold of the originals and not merely copies.”
The official papers and memoirs
of Juliusz Łukasiewicz published in 1970 in the book Diplomat in Paris 1936-1939 reconfirmed the authenticity
of the Polish documents. Łukasiewicz was the Polish ambassador to Paris, who authored several of the secret Polish
documents. The collection was edited by Wacław Jędrzejewicz, a former Polish diplomat and cabinet member. Jędrzejewicz
considered the documents made public by the Germans absolutely genuine, and quoted from several of them.
Tyler G. Kent, who worked at the U.S. Embassy in London in 1939 and 1940,
has also confirmed the authenticity of the secret Polish documents. Kent says that he saw copies of U.S. diplomatic messages
in the files which corresponded to the Polish documents. 
The German Foreign Office
published the Polish documents on March 29, 1940. The Reich Ministry of Propaganda released the documents to strengthen
the case of the American isolationists and to prove the degree of America’s responsibility for the outbreak of war.
In Berlin, journalists from around the world were permitted to examine the original documents themselves, along with a large
number of other documents from the Polish Foreign Ministry. The release of the documents caused an international media sensation.
American newspapers published lengthy excerpts from the documents and gave the story large front-page headline coverage.
However, the impact of the
released documents was far less than the German government had hoped for. Leading U.S. government officials emphatically
denounced the documents as not being authentic. William Bullitt, who was especially incriminated by the documents,
stated, “I have never made to anyone the statements attributed to me.” Secretary of State Cordell Hull denounced
the documents: “I may say most emphatically that neither I nor any of my associates in the Department of State have
ever heard of any such conversations as those alleged, nor do we give them the slightest credence. The statements alleged
have not represented in any way at any time the thought or the policy of the American government.” American newspapers stressed these high-level denials in reporting the release of the Polish documents.
These categorical denials by high-level U.S. government officials almost
completely eliminated the effect of the secret Polish documents. The vast majority of the American people in 1940 trusted
their elected political leaders to tell the truth. If the Polish documents were in fact authentic and genuine, this would
mean that President Roosevelt and his representatives had lied to the American public, while the German government told
the truth. In 1940, this was far more than the trusting American public could accept.
MORE EVIDENCE ROOSEVELT INSTIGATED WORLD WAR II
While the secret Polish documents alone indicate that Roosevelt was preparing
the American public for war against Germany, a large amount of complementary evidence confirms the conspiracy reported by
the Polish ambassadors. The diary of James V. Forrestal, the first U.S. secretary of defense, also reveals that Roosevelt
and his administration helped start World War II. Forrestal’s entry on December 27, 1945 stated:
Played golf today with Joe Kennedy [Roosevelt’s
Ambassador to Great Britain in the years immediately before the war]. I asked him about his conversations with Roosevelt
and Neville Chamberlain from 1938 on. He said Chamberlain’s position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which
to fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy’s view: That Hitler would have fought Russia
without any later conflict with England if it had not been for Bullitt’s urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939
that the Germans must be faced down about Poland; neither the French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war
if it had not been for the constant needling from Washington. Bullitt, he said, kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans
wouldn’t fight; Kennedy that they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he says, stated that America
and the world Jews had forced England into the war. In his telephone conversations with Roosevelt in the summer of 1939
the President kept telling him to put some iron up Chamberlain’s backside. Kennedy’s response always was that
putting iron up his backside did no good unless the British had some iron with which to fight, and they did not….
What Kennedy told me in this conversation jibes substantially with the remarks Clarence Dillon had made
to me already, to the general effect that Roosevelt had asked him in some manner to communicate privately with the British
to the end that Chamberlain should have greater firmness in his dealings with Germany. Dillon told me that at Roosevelt’s
request he had talked with Lord Lothian in the same general sense as Kennedy reported Roosevelt having urged him to do with
Chamberlain. Lothian presumably was to communicate to Chamberlain the gist of his conversation with Dillon.
Looking backward there is undoubtedly foundation for Kennedy’s belief that Hitler’s attack
could have been deflected to Russia….”
Joseph Kennedy is known
to have had a good memory, and it is highly likely that Kennedy’s statements to James Forrestal are accurate. Forrestal
died on May 22, 1949 under suspicious circumstances when he fell from his hospital window.
Sir Ronald Lindsay, the British ambassador to Washington, confirmed Roosevelt’s
secret policy to instigate war against Germany with the release of a confidential diplomatic report after the war. The report
described a secret meeting on September 18, 1938 between Roosevelt and Ambassador Lindsay. Roosevelt said that if Britain
and France were forced into a war against Germany, the United States would ultimately join the war. Roosevelt’s idea
to start a war was for Britain and France to impose a blockade against Germany without actually declaring war. The important
point was to call it a defensive war based on lofty humanitarian grounds and on the desire to wage hostilities with a minimum
of suffering and the least possible loss of life and property. The blockade would provoke some kind of German military response,
but would free Britain and France from having to declare war. Roosevelt believed he could then convince the American public
to support war against Germany, including shipments of weapons to Britain and France, by insisting that the United States
was still neutral in a non-declared conflict.
President Roosevelt told Ambassador
Lindsay that if news of their conversation was ever made public, it could mean Roosevelt’s impeachment. What Roosevelt
proposed to Lindsay was in effect a scheme to violate the U.S. Constitution by illegally starting a war. For this and other
reasons, Ambassador Lindsay stated that during his three years of service in Washington he developed little regard for America’s
Ambassador Lindsay in a series
of final reports also indicated that Roosevelt was delighted at the prospect of a new world war. Roosevelt promised Lindsay
that he would delay German ships under false pretenses in a feigned search for arms. This would allow the German ships to
be easily seized by the British under circumstances arranged with exactitude between the American and British authorities.
Lindsay reported that Roosevelt “spoke in a tone of almost impish glee and though I may be wrong the whole business
gave me the impression of resembling a school-boy prank.”
Ambassador Lindsay was personally perturbed that the president of the United States could be
gay and joyful about a pending tragedy which seemed so destructive of the hopes of all mankind. It was unfortunate at this
important juncture that the United States had a president whose emotions and ideas were regarded by a friendly British ambassador
as being childish.
Roosevelt’s desire to
support France and England in a war against Germany is discussed in a letter from Verne Marshall, former editor of the Cedar
Rapids Gazette, to Charles C. Tansill. The letter stated:
President Roosevelt wrote a note to William Bullitt [in the summer of 1939],
then Ambassador to France, directing him to advise the French Government that if, in the event of a Nazi attack upon Poland,
France and England did not go to Poland’s aid, those countries could expect no help from America if a general war
developed. On the other hand, if France and England immediately declared war on Germany, they could expect “all aid”
from the United States.
F.D.R.’s instructions to Bullitt were to send this
word along to “Joe” and “Tony,” meaning Ambassadors Kennedy, in London, and Biddle, in Warsaw, respectively.
F.D.R. wanted Daladier, Chamberlain and Josef Beck to know of these instructions to Bullitt. Bullitt merely sent his note
from F.D.R. to Kennedy in the diplomatic pouch from Paris. Kennedy followed Bullitt’s idea and forwarded it to Biddle.
When the Nazis grabbed Warsaw and Beck disappeared, they must have come into possession of the F.D.R. note. The man who
wrote the report I sent you saw it in Berlin in October, 1939.
William Phillips, the
American ambassador to Italy, also stated in his postwar memoirs that the Roosevelt administration in late 1938 was committed
to going to war on the side of Britain and France. Phillips wrote: “On this and many other occasions, I would have
liked to have told him [Count Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister] frankly that in the event of a European war, the United
States would undoubtedly be involved on the side of the Allies. But in view of my official position, I could not properly
make such a statement without instructions from Washington, and these I never received.”
When Anthony Eden returned
to England in December 1938, he carried with him an assurance from President Roosevelt that the United States would enter
as soon as practicable a European war against Hitler if the occasion arose. This information was obtained by Senator William
Borah of Idaho, who was contemplating how and when to give out this information, when he dropped dead in his bathroom. The
story was confirmed to historian Harry Elmer Barnes by some of Senator Borah’s closest colleagues at the time.
The American ambassador
to Poland, Anthony Drexel Biddle, was an ideological colleague of President Roosevelt and a good friend of William Bullitt.
Roosevelt used Biddle to influence the Polish government to refuse to enter into negotiations with Germany. Carl J. Burckhardt,
the League of Nations High Commissioner to Danzig, reported in his postwar memoirs on a memorable conversation he had with
Biddle. On December 2, 1938, Biddle told Burckhardt with remarkable satisfaction that the Poles were ready to wage war over
Danzig. Biddle predicted that in April a new crisis would develop, and that moderate British and French leaders would be
influenced by public opinion to support war. Biddle predicted a holy war against Germany would break out.
Bernard Baruch, who was Roosevelt’s
chief advisor, scoffed at a statement made on March 10, 1939 by Neville Chamberlain that “the outlook in international
affairs is tranquil.” Baruch agreed passionately with Winston Churchill, who had told him: “War is coming very
soon. We will be in it and you [the United States] will be in it.”
Bonnet, the French foreign minister in 1939, also confirmed the role of William Bullitt as Roosevelt’s agent in pushing
France into war. In a letter to Hamilton Fish dated March 26, 1971, Bonnet wrote, “One thing is certain is that Bullitt
in 1939 did everything he could to make France enter the war.”
Dr. Edvard Beneš, the
former president of Czechoslovakia, wrote in his memoirs that he had a lengthy secret conversation at Hyde Park with President
Roosevelt on May 28, 1939. Roosevelt assured Beneš that the United States would actively intervene on the side of
Great Britain and France against Germany in the anticipated European war.
American newspaper columnist
Karl von Wiegand, who was the chief European newspaper columnist of the International News Service, met with Ambassador
William Bullitt at the U.S. embassy in Paris on April 25, 1939. More than four months before the outbreak of war, Bullitt
told Wiegand: “War in Europe has been decided upon. Poland has the assurance of the support of Britain and France,
and will yield to no demands from Germany. America will be in the war soon after Britain and France enter it.” When Wiegand said that in the end Germany would be driven into the arms of Soviet Russia and Bolshevism, Ambassador Bullitt
replied: “What of it. There will not be enough Germans left when the war is over to be worth Bolshevizing.”
On March 14, 1939, Slovakia dissolved the state of Czechoslovakia by declaring itself an independent republic. Czechoslovakian
President Emil Hácha signed a formal agreement the next day with Hitler establishing a German protectorate over Bohemia
and Moravia, which constituted the Czech portion of the previous entity. The British government initially accepted the new
situation, reasoning that Britain’s guarantee of Czechoslovakia given after Munich was rendered void by the internal
collapse of that state. It soon became evident after the proclamation of the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia that the new
regime enjoyed considerable popularity among the people living in it. Also, the danger of a war between the Czechs and the
Slovaks had been averted.
However, Bullitt’s response
to the creation of the German protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia was highly unfavorable. Bullitt telephoned Roosevelt
and, in an “almost hysterical” voice, Bullitt urged Roosevelt to make a dramatic denunciation of Germany and
to immediately ask Congress to repeal the Neutrality Act.
Washington journalists Drew
Pearson and Robert S. Allen reported in their nationally syndicated column that on March 16, 1939, President Roosevelt “sent
a virtual ultimatum to Chamberlain” demanding that the British government strongly oppose Germany. Pearson and Allen
reported that “the President warned that Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the sale
of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued.”
Responding to Roosevelt’s
pressure, the next day Chamberlain ended Britain’s policy of cooperation with Germany when he made a speech at Birmingham
bitterly denouncing Hitler. Chamberlain also announced the end of the British “appeasement” policy, stating that
from now on Britain would oppose any further territorial moves by Hitler. Two weeks later the British government formally
committed itself to war in case of German-Polish hostilities.
Roosevelt also attempted to arm Poland so that Poland would be more willing to go to war against
Germany. Ambassador Bullitt reported from Paris in a confidential telegram to Washington on April 9, 1939, his conversation
with Polish Ambassador Łukasiewicz. Bullitt told Łukasiewicz that although U.S. law prohibited direct financial
aid to Poland, the Roosevelt administration might be able to supply warplanes to Poland indirectly through Britain. Bullitt
stated: “The Polish ambassador asked me if it might not be possible for Poland to obtain financial help and airplanes
from the United States. I replied that I believed the Johnson Act would forbid any loans from the United States to Poland,
but added that it might be possible for England to purchase planes for cash in the United States and turn them over to Poland.”
Bullitt also attempted to
bypass the Neutrality Act and supply France with airplanes. A secret conference of Ambassador Bullitt with French Premier
Daladier and the French minister of aviation, Guy La Chambre, discussed the procurement of airplanes from America for France.
Bullitt, who was in frequent telephonic conversation with Roosevelt, suggested a means by which the Neutrality Act could
be circumvented in the event of war. Bullitt’s suggestion was to set up assembly plants in Canada, apparently on the
assumption that Canada would not be a formal belligerent in the war. Bullitt also arranged for a secret French mission to
come to the United States and purchase airplanes in the winter of 1938-1939. The secret purchase of American airplanes by
the French leaked out when a French aviator crashed on the West Coast.
On August 23, 1939, Sir Horace
Wilson, Chamberlain’s closest advisor, went to American Ambassador Joseph Kennedy with an urgent appeal from Chamberlain
to President Roosevelt. Regretting that Britain had unequivocally obligated itself to Poland in case of war, Chamberlain
now turned to Roosevelt as a last hope for peace. Kennedy telephoned the State Department and stated: “The British
want one thing from us and one thing only, namely that we put pressure on the Poles. They felt that they could not, given
their obligations, do anything of this sort but that we could.”
Presented with a possibility to save the peace in Europe, President Roosevelt rejected
Chamberlain’s desperate plea out of hand. With Roosevelt’s rejection, Kennedy reported, British Prime Minister
Chamberlain lost all hope. Chamberlain stated: “The futility of it all is the thing that is frightful. After all,
we cannot save the Poles. We can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of all Europe.”
U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt and his advisers played
a crucial role in planning and instigating World War II. This is proven by the secret Polish documents as well as numerous
statements from highly positioned, well-known and authoritative Allied leaders who corroborate the contents of the Polish
 Count Jerzy Potocki to Polish Foreign Minister in Warsaw, The German White Paper: Full Text of the Polish Documents Issued
by the Berlin Foreign Office; with a foreword by C. Hartley Grattan, New York: Howell, Soskin & Company, 1940, pp.
 Juliusz Lukasiewicz to Polish Foreign Minister in Warsaw, The German White Paper: Full Text of the Polish Documents Issued
by the Berlin Foreign Office; with a foreword by C. Hartley Grattan, New York: Howell, Soskin & Company, 1940, pp.
 Germany. Foreign Office Archive Commission. Roosevelts Weg in den Krieg: Geheimdokumente zur Kriegspolitik des Praesidenten
der Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag, 1943. Translated into English by Weber, Mark, “President Roosevelt’s
Campaign to Incite War in Europe: The Secret Polish Documents,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1983,
Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 150-152.
 Tansill, Charles C., “The United States and the Road to War in Europe,” in Barnes, Harry Elmer (ed.), Perpetual
War for Perpetual Peace, Newport Beach, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review, 1993, p. 184 (footnote 292).
 Chamberlain, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, p. 60 (footnote 14).
 Barnes, Harry Elmer, The Court Historians versus Revisionism, N.p.: privately printed, 1952, p. 10.
 Raczynski, Edward, In Allied London, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1963, p. 51.
 Weber, Mark, “President Roosevelt’s Campaign to Incite War in Europe: The Secret Polish Documents,” The
Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1983, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 142.
 New York Times, March 30, 1940, p. 1.
 Forrestal, James V., The Forrestal Diaries, edited by Walter Millis and E.S. Duffield, New York: Vanguard Press,
1951, pp. 121-122.
 Dispatch No. 349 of Sept. 30, 1938, by Sir Ronald Lindsay, Documents on British Foreign Policy, (ed.). Ernest L.
Woodard, Third Series, Vol. VII, London, 1954, pp. 627-629. See also Lash, Joseph P., Roosevelt and Churchill 1939-1941,
New York: Norton, 1976, pp. 25-27.
 Dallek, Robert, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy 1932-1945, New York: Oxford University Press,
1979, pp. 31, 164-165.
 Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review,
1989, pp. 518-519.
 Tansill, Charles C., “The United States and the Road to War in Europe,” in Barnes, Harry Elmer (ed.), Perpetual
War for Perpetual Peace, Newport Beach, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review, 1993, p. 168.
 Phillips, William, Ventures in Diplomacy, North Beverly, Mass.: privately published, 1952, pp. 220-221.
 Barnes, Harry Elmer, Barnes against the Blackout, Costa Mesa, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review, 1991, p. 208.
 Burckhardt, Carl, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939, Munich: Callwey, 1960, p. 225.
 Sherwood, Robert E., Roosevelt and Hopkins, an Intimate History, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1948, p. 113.
 Fish, Hamilton, FDR The Other Side of the Coin: How We Were Tricked into World War II, New York: Vantage Press,
1976, p. 62.
 Beneš, Edvard, Memoirs of Dr. Edvard Beneš, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954, pp. 79-80.
 “Von Wiegand Says-,” Chicago-Herald American, Oct. 8, 1944, p. 2.
 Chicago-Herald American, April 23, 1944, p. 18.
 Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review,
1989, p. 250.
 Moffat, Jay P., The Moffat Papers 1919-1943, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1956, p. 232.
 Pearson, Drew and Allen, Robert S., “Washington Daily Merry-Go-Round,” Washington Times-Herald, April
14, 1939, p. 16.
 U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States (Diplomatic Papers), 1939, General, Vol. I, Washington:
1956, p. 122.
 Chamberlain, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, pp. 101-102.
 Koskoff, David E., Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974, p. 207; see
also Taylor, A.J.P., The Origins of the Second World War, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005, p. 272.