Click on this text to see How JEWS Opened America`s Borders
STOP ALL IMMIGRATION NOW...!
The Jew uses
every possible means to undermine the racial foundations
of a subjugated people to break down the last barriers of discrimination
between him and other peoples.
The Jews are responsible for bringing negroes and muslims
the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate
and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.
For as long as a people remain
racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of
their blood they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew
become master of any people except a bastardized people.
That is why the Jew
endeavours to lower the racial quality of a people by permanently
adulterating the blood of the individuals who make up that people. The Star of
David has steadily ascended
as the will to National Self-Preservation declined.
Total Global domination is the Jew's endgame. Destroying countries, cultures
and cohesive races are the ways and means to that end.
Jewish Promotion of Non-White Immigration into
And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How the Jews Opened America’s Borders
Jews Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform
Groups Praise Immigration Reform Proposals
Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography
Klein: Immigration Will Save the U.S. from White Racism
THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE 1965 OPEN
THE DEATH OF AMERICA
enacted in 1965 with the signing of the
Open Immigration Law
Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of
as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and
law into existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American
Christian culture in their aggressive
efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965
is a prime example of that hostility.
are a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt
complex - and for good reason.) Jews fear a homogenous Christian culture of which they would
ascend to influential positions. Rather, in a homogenous Christian culture, Jews are looked
upon, (and rightly so), as “Christ-killers.” This is why the Jews tried to get
Gibson’s movie, The Passion of Jesus Christ, removed from the silver screen.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be
seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:
—— “Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive
democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression
to the concept of cultural pluralism.” ——
Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind
The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings
on the 1965 bill. Javits authoredan article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’
that proposed immigration levelsof 500,000 per year for 20 years with no
restrictions on national origin.
Emanuel Celler (NY)
Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration
for over 40 years in theHouse of Representatives, introduced similar
legislation resulting in the“Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor
the fatal bill of 1965.
3. Leo Pfeffer
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”),
wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.
4. Norman Podhoretz
(Writer and Member of
The Council of Foreign Relations)
Norman Podhoretz, a leftist Jew “neo-con,”
wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The
the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, (there
is no end to their organizations), filed briefs
in support of open immigration before the Senate
Subcommittee in the early sixties
leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling
the aims of the
Jewish conspiracyas seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that
year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of
America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations
whose customs, religions, and
culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity.
context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants
bythe Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate
to expand both demographically
and politically. And expand they will and do! But any
attempts by European-derived peoples to
retain demographic, political, and cultural control
in America are represented by the Jews
as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’
THE JEWS ARE
GUILTY OF THE RUINATION OF AMERICA.
ALL IMMIGRATION NOW...!
The Genocidal Anti-White Narrative -
·Flood EVERY &
ONLY white countries with hundreds of millions of non-whites
·Create assimilation laws that restrict Whites
from having any states,
counties, cities, towns,
villages, neighborhoods or schools to themselves
·Institute “diversity” policies to replace
White kids in schools, universities, and employment
·Promote miscegenation & demonize those opposed to it
·Create “Hate Speech”
laws that make it a
criminal act for Whites to
object to their genocide
·Dehumanize White kids by telling them they’re a
privileged “social construct” that are not worth preserving
·Demonize White history while canonizing the history of non-whites
·Coverup the alarming
number of violent crimes committed against whites
·Silence, harass, threaten, fire, demonize, or physically
assault anyone who opposes the above policies
“The birth-rate of the Non-Jews has to be
suppressed massively.” (Talmud - Zohar II, 4b)
WHAT THE JEWS SAY IS GOOD FOR WHITE COUNTRIES
SHOULD SURE AS HELL BE GOOD FOR ISRAEL... Right?
A study was conducted by professors at the University of Copenhagen and
Aarhus University in Denmark to determine the effect of ethnic diversity on society.
The researchers performed a meta-analysis of 1,001 estimates
from 87 different studies
from around the Western world to make their determinations. Their
were published in the Annual Review of Political Science, demonstrate that “continued
immigration and corresponding growing ethnic diversity” had a demonstrably negative impact
on social cohesion, unity, and togetherness. This is something that should be entirely
to anyone who has been paying attention and understands the basics of human nature.
Peter Thisted Dinesen, a main researchers on the study, wrote:
"To be clear, the overall negative relationship between residential ethnic diversity
and social trust is statistically significant and holds up when conditioning
range of potential confounders and moderators.
Extant studies have relatively
a significant negative relationship between
ethnic diversity and various forms of social trust.”
While this study has assuredly angered many of the proponents of “diversity”
(aka White genocide),
other serious researchers have recognized the value in this work. Tom
var de Meer, professor
of political science at the University of Amsterdam, found the study
to be “excellent and
conclusive.” Eric Kaufmann, professor of politics at Birkbeck
University of London, reiterates
the findings of the study, saying, “Higher diversity
is significantly associated
with lower trust in communities, even when controlling for deprivation.”
Ethnic diversity is a weakness. We all know this to be true. We have watched
communities have been destroyed and the remaining White inhabitants no longer
associate with each other the way they used to – no more block parties, no more cookies
or cake for the new neighbors, and fewer front porches where people converse with others.
People shut themselves off from the alienating world outside of their homes, and the
repercussions are profound.
The people who are enforcing ethnic
diversity across the White world do not actually think
that it brings strength to communities;
they know it does not. They are flooding White
communities with alien people precisely because
they know it will destroy the very fabric
of society, and this weakened populace becomes easier
to control and eventually destroy.
Ethnic diversity is a
weapon wielded by JEWS.
“Like Esau, America has sold its birthright for a mess of
multiculturalism and diversity. In conforming to this radical social
agenda, America betrayed its posterity to an alien ideology which
makes White people feel like strangers in their own lands.
“To understand how far we’ve fallen short, we need only
look at how life was lived not so long
ago when America was still great because it was still unapologetically White and Christian:”
SEE HERE: https://christiansfortruth.com/the-beauty-of-the-united-states-of-america-before-multiculturalism/
A War Against White People Is
In Full Swing in Europe and the US
By Mike Walsh
Anti-White racism has distressingly become an
accepted cultural norm throughout the
Western World. Mainstream media, education,
and even science and medicine have been
hijacked by brainwashed zealots who push
relentless white-hating propaganda on the masses.
intent is to reduce the current World’s 8% ethnic-European population to
numbers that can be controlled much as are Native Americans today.
Increasingly, ethnic-Europeans, even in
their own countries, exist in ghettos (reservations)
Excluded from communities
taken over by government-sponsored non-European migrants,
Europeans are now
second-class citizens (kaffirs) when seeking benefits, educational and
Anti-White apartheid throughout the West is considered normal
and is institutionalised.
How I Enjoy My “White Privilege”
Sourced from Bitchute
It is obvious, in twenty-first century America, that European-Americans
are the most privileged group in the country.
We essentially are the bees knees
and everyone else is oppressed just because we exist. So, as a white man,
to share how I enjoy my white privilege.
1. I Am Allowed To Be Openly Discriminated Against
If a black man rants and raves on about how he hates me just because of my ethnic heritage, he cannot be racist.
That is impossible. If a Jewish professor advocates all whites commit mass-suicide
due to slavery,
or that until the white race is gone we cannot rid our society
of ‘oppression,’ he clearly isn’t a racist.
as a cisgender heterosexual white male, I am the cherry on top. Even if crime stats display black-on-white
crime is far worse than the contrary, it really is because we’re oppressing them; therefore,
it’s not racist.
I love my privilege.
2. I Cannot Wear Symbols Of European
If I want to sport a Kolovrat (Slavic Swastika,
sunwheel, spinning cross, circle of life) necklace, that’s clearly
of racial hatred and that automatically makes me a flaming racist; thus, I am a bad person.
If I like the Celtic cross, I cannot wear that without people seeing a living,
breathing Nazi marching their way while
Adolf Hitler gives a speech in the background.
That, or I’m a backwoods-dwelling hillbilly Ku Klux Klan member.
I’m also not allowed to be proud of my ancestry and all the years of war, trial and error, hells and glories.
appreciate my people’s poets and writers, musicians and philosophers,
or the pre-Christian
Pagan path, or our dances or architecture or family traditions.
But every other race can.
See, it doesn’t matter
if I’m part of a long history of people and it’s my turn to carry on their story. I do not
get that opportunity without potentially suffering, societally speaking. I am told to abandon it altogether.
I love my privilege.
3. I Get Legally Discriminated Against In Jobs And Universities
European-Americans and Asian-Americans are the two groups you can legally
in the open and on enforced policy, based solely on our
ethnicity through the means of Affirmative Action.
it fun to wonder whether checking your race on that job application,
you’re applying for, might cost you the position or slot?
Marxism must be enforced and outcome of equality is the set standard. It’ll never happen, but America seems
think that is actually possible. Therefore, the white man must be told, and
forced, to step down and move aside.
I love my privilege.
4. I Am Not Allowed To Use Racial
Slurs But Other Ethnicities Can Without Much Consequence
If I dare slip up and utter a racial slur, it is damn near the apocalypse. And, if I’m really unfortunate
and caught and I’m
famous, then I need to go on a bunch of late-night talk
shows and apologize to a potential million people of whom I’ve offended.
But a man of African heritage or a Hispanic may go on calling me a cracker
or whitey all they please. But that’s obviously
not racist because I’m
super privileged and my existence oppresses them. See, they’re really giving it hard to
‘the man.’ It’s almost like they’re only defending themselves and my words might as well
be literal violence.
I love my privilege.
Who Is Really The Most Privileged?
Sarcasm aside, who is really the most privileged in contemporary America?
Well, let us see here. Who is the one group
you dare not criticize over all other
groups? Who is the apparent minority that somehow manages to operate much of
Hollywood and mainstream media? Who is the group that gets to perpetuate their moral compass and their politics due to
owning so much control over film and media? Who is fine seeing another entire group of people
trampled on just so they can keep their little ethno-state, and the West is
totally cool with it?
do not have to like it, but it is obviously the Jewish folk. To me, if I was to talk about who is really privileged, it’d
be them. I do not feel privileged. I’m not saying my life was hardcore
and that I fought gangs off to see the light of another
day, but that word doesn’t
sit well with me. And, to be a blunt bastard here, if I am privileged, then I do not care.
This observation of this ethnic group has nothing to do with blind senseless
hatred, or bias. It does not equate to hating
an entire group either. But much
of the Jewish folk have far to many leanings toward liberalism, open borders for
countries, and find many conservative values as ‘backwards.’ See the manipulative language?
Designed to put them on the moral high-ground while you sit in your outdated world.
The innocent term, ‘it’s okay to be White’ is now considered a hate crime,
"It's OK to be White" is now considered hate speech
even in historically European countries.
The vile ideology of White-hating
evangelists controls the educational and media narrative.
Their anti-white propaganda has indoctrinated
a sizable segment of their duped audience
into believing that being ethnic European automatically
means that you’re evil,
whilst being Black, Asian or Muslim automatically means that you’re
beyond all sin.
Using lies and deception, Marxist indoctrinated subversives aim
to convince a disturbing
number of useful idiots, including Europeans, that Whites are fundamentally
have taken advantage of other ethnic groups throughout history in order to build
There is never mention of ethnic-Europeans
being enslaved, not only by their own kind
and by Arab slavers. During the Soviet Union
(1917 – 1991) era, a system that was sponsored
and laundered by globalists, cattle car
trains filled with European slaves carried tens of millions
of Europe’s Orthodox Christians
to the Bolshevik Gulag camps. It is thought that as many
as 40 million White people were enslaved
and 40 per cent Gulag victims martyred.
All this is unknown to ordinary ethnic-Europeans
because it has been airbrushed out of news
media, educational and history books.
“Ownership of the media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
Anti-White propaganda is taught to the next generation
through movies, television,
and in the classroom, With little resistance from guilt-complexed
many accept the propaganda that they’re evil because of the colour of their skin.
Every movie on alien owned Netflix casts the White man as the villain, the Black man as
the hero. The shirt-lifting gay is the cool guy who reasons things out, the woman has the
So it goes on, mum is the breadwinner whilst White dad is an idiot or a layabout, often both,
kids are sexualised.
Imagine the roles being reversed and see where
that gets you ~ straight into the town’s
slammer after being crucified by the anti-White
Again; “Ownership of the media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
~ Alexander Solzhenitsin.
Western presstitutes and
politicians vilified Adolf Hitler, who in fact put into reverse
everything that is happening
today. As a historian, I repeatedly ask palace historians for
a single genuine anti-coloured
sentiment expressed by any leading figure in the
Reich system. I am still waiting.
All that Adolf Hitler sought was to give Germans equality. Now, when Whites, proud of their
heritage, demand equality with non-Europeans they are demonised as ‘race haters’, xenophobes’,
‘White supremacists’. When did you ever see such accusations levelled at Jews,
Asians and Blacks who respect and promote their own ethnicity?
a look at the constant brainwashing anti-White propaganda; the racing mixing narrative,
diversity marketing. Ask yourself how this would be described if these roles and situations
were reversed. Imagine the outrage by Jewish or Asian communities if they
to accept ethnic-Europeans into their communities.
In much of Europe and especially
the UK, Europeans are now too scared to report crimes
committed by migrants for fear of their
being questioned as motivated by racism or their
being charged with racism.
Schoolchildren are routinely programmed to believe Whites as being the sole racists
responsible for black slavery. In fact, it was Blacks, Jewish bankers and merchants,
the degenerate self-loathing liberal elite who were in most
cases the financiers and en-slavers
of Blacks and Europeans.
The clothing and other sections of our supermarkets today
are made in Asian sweatshops
in conditions far worse than those in the American cotton plantations.
Fact: You are wearing
a slave manufactured shirt or dress made by an Asian coolie in a factory
financed by a
globalist bank. Happy?
many of those enslaved through the ages past were their own people. England’s
were the Irish peoples, followed by English and Scottish cargoes of
despair bound for the colonies,
and then replaced or added to by Africans.
England, during the 18th century, traded White slaves
for Black slaves, the
buyers being African chiefs and chieftains. They never tell you that
Orwellian history avoids the fact that sea
captains who brought African slaves to the British
colonies, that later became the United States,
purchased their Blacks from the Black slave
owners, notably the King of Dahomey. Over the past
1,000 years, the most prevailing slave
owners were Africans including Muslims. This is airbrushed
from the educational and media narrative.
Spineless Europeans, their minds
already ensnared by anti-White propaganda, dismiss what
is clearly taking place, close their
eyes to it, or become part of their own extinction. The minority
who do care ram these truth
into closed minds so they at least can say, ‘at least I tried to warn you.’
The Greatest Mass Murderers of all Time
says Jewish Columnist
In 2006, a remarkable article — and admission —
in the Israeli news source Ynet News. Titled “Stalin’s
and written by Jewish columnist Sever Plocker, this piece confirmed
terrible crimes which Jewish Communists had committed under Stalin.
“We must not forget that some of greatest murderers of modern
times were Jewish,”
Plocker started out by saying. He wenton
to make a number of startling confessions:
a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90years ago, between the 19th
and 20th of December 1917,in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war,
Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment ofThe All-Russian
Extraordinary Commission for CombatingCounter-Revolution and Sabotage, also
known as Cheka.“Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest
state security organization. Its organizationalstructure was changed every few
as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later
cannot know with certainty the number of deaths
Cheka was responsible
for in its various manifestations,
but the number is surely at least
20 million, including
victimsof the forced collectivization,the hunger,
purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass
death at Gulags.
Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent
farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie,
senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement
“opposition members” who were defined
and countless members of
the Communist party itself.
In his new, highly
praised book The War of the World,
Historian Niall Ferguson writes
that no revolution in the
history of mankind devoured its children
with the same
unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution.
book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University’s
Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that
was directed internally. “Lenin, Stalin, and their successors
could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale
cooperation of disciplined ‘terror officials,’ cruel interrogators,
snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many
bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western
Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even
provided it with a kosher certificate.
And us, the Jews? An Israeli student
finishes high school without
ever hearing the name Genrikh Yagoda,
the greatest Jewish murderer
of the 20th Century, the GPU’s
deputy commander and the founder
and commander of the NKVD. “Yagoda
Stalin’s collectivization orders and
is responsible for the deaths
of at least 10 million people. “His
Jewish deputies established
and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin
no longer viewed
him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and
replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty
Genrikh Yagoda, director of the NKVD, the Soviet Union’s Stalin-era security and intelligence agency.
was not Jewish but was blessed with an active
Jewish wife. In his
book Stalin: Court of the Red Star,
Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore
writes that during the
darkest period of terror, when the Communist
worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful,
young Jewish women. “Stalin’s close associates and loyalists
included member of the Central Committee and Politburo
Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the
“first Stalinist” and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine,
an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind, did not
move Kaganovich. Many Jews sold their soul to the devil
the Communist revolution and have blood on their
hands for eternity.
We’ll mention just
head of the NKVD’s special department and the
chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.
(center) inspecting the construction of the Moscow-Volga canal, built by slave labor from the Gulags.
In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of
holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses
were of Jewish origin. Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the
Jewishness of ‘our hangmen,’ who served the Red Terror with
loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will
always remind us of their origin.
Gulags: Jewish-Run Concentration Camps
As mentioned above, the infamous Soviet Gulags were
under the direct control of the
Jew Yagoda. He was not the
only such Jew involved in the running of these camps,
in which millions were interned and nearly 1.4 million died.
most famous revelation about the Jewish nature of the
Gulags was that of famous dissident Alexander
Speaking from personal experience as a Gulag
prisoner, Solzhenitsyn gave a candid account
of Jews in charge of the Soviet prison
in his book, Two Hundred Years Together.
According to his observations, Jews made up a clear
preponderance in the Gulag administration
and in the early
Bolshevist government, saying that of the 22 ministers in the
first Soviet government three were Russian, one Georgian,
one Armenian and 17 were
Jews. In addition, he points out,
from personal experience once again, that “two thirds
Kiev Cheka” (secret police) were Jews.
In 1937, another book appeared in Germany called Jewish-Run
Concentration Camps in
the Soviet Union, which revealed that
Communist Jews were the commandants of 11 out of the 12
The phrase “Great Replacement” - in the news following its use by
shooter Brenton Tarrant - means exactly that: the extermination of the
white race in its historic homelands through mass Third World immigration,
which left to run its course, will see whites plummet to minority in
most western European states, North America, Australia and New Zealand
next 30 or 40 years - and then be utterly smothered to extinction within a
few decades after that.
Although liberal media outlets are denying that this is reality - because they are part of
the grand plan to make this extermination process possible - all
the facts show clearly
that whites are being replaced
in all their homelands, and only the outright liars of the controlled
media could dare to claim otherwise.
In the United States of America, for example,
the US is set to become majority nonwhite by
2045 - or in just 27 years’ time.
During that year, the US Census Bureau said,
“whites” will comprise 49.7 percent of the
in contrast to 24.6 percent for Hispanics, 13.1 percent for blacks,
7.9 percent for Asians, and 3.8 percent for multiracial population.
Because nonwhites as a group are younger than
whites, the minority white tipping point
earlier for younger age groups. The census projections indicate that, for youth
under 18 - the post-millennial population–nonwhites will outnumber whites in 2020 - less
than two years away.
For those age 18-29–members
of the younger labor force
and voting age populations–the
tipping point will occur in 2027.
By 2060, the census projects whites will comprise only
36 percent of
the under age 18 population, with
Hispanics accounting for 32 percent.
This prediction uses the infamously inaccurate
federal definition of “white,” (which is
- so the actual number of whites
is sure to be even less than the official statistics.
In Western Europe, much the same scenario
is unfolding. In Britain, for example,
as of 2012 was 27.1 percent of the total
in primary schools, and 23.4 percent in secondary
schools. At that rate of reproduction, nonwhites will be the majority of the
population under the age of 21 in the UK by 2030—only 10 years away.
white British children have been effectively
ethnically cleansed from most schools in greater
London, Birmingham, Manchester, and parts of South Yorkshire and East Lancashire, with
no less than 1,755 institutions—or one out of nine schools across the country—now having
“non-English speaking pupils.”
Overall, given the mass nonwhite immigration into
Britain underway since the 1960s,
has led to the
result that white British people will become an absolute
minority in their homeland by 2066—at the very latest, and likely sooner.
reported by Professor David Coleman, figures from the Office of National Statistics
(ONS) show that “at current immigration levels” (that was written in 2010), the proportion
of the white British-born population will fall from 80 percent
to 59 percent by 2051.
“On those assumptions
the ‘white British’ population would decline to 45 million by 2051,”
Professor Coleman wrote. “Were the assumptions to hold, the ‘white British’
population of Britain would become the minority after about 2066.”
Importantly, he added that this was a “milestone
that would be passed much earlier in younger
groups.” Professor Coleman’s point about the age-spread is of vital importance to
understanding the full extent of the racial demographic replacement of white British
In 2014, for example, the median age in Britain was 40 years old, and some 58 percent
This means that within the next 35 years, the majority of that population will either have died,
or be close to death—and the younger generations, which are,
Coleman has pointed out, overwhelmingly
nonwhite, will have replaced them.
In other words, the racial demographic collapse will
happen suddenly, as the older white
dies off—a factor which is being rapidly sped up by the increasing and ongoing
nonwhite “immigration,” as borne out by the fact that the white population was already
79 percent of the total in 2011.
In June 2016, Professor Coleman repeated his prediction in Standpoint magazine. His
driven by the highest immigration in our history, is destabilising and transforming its
population, its environment and its ethnic make-up into something quite new,” and that
“migration accounted overall for 85 percent of population
growth from 2001–2012.”
Professor Coleman pointed out that in the “1991
census, the nonwhite population, mostly of
immigrant origin, stood at 3 million or 6 percent of the total in England and
Wales. By 2011 this had increased to nearly 8 million, or 14 percent of the total.
“Those describing themselves as ‘White British’ comprised
88 percent of the total population in 2001.
“But by the 2011 census, the ‘White
British’ population in England and Wales had declined
by 400,000, whereas the nonwhite population had increased by over three million, and
the population describing itself as white but not British (many from Eastern Europe)
increased by just over a million.
“I made a projection in 2010 that if immigration stayed at its long-term rate of around 180,000
a year as it was at the time, the White British-born population
would decline from 80
percent of the total then
to just 59 percent in 2051,” Professor Coleman continued.
“Taking the projection to a more uncertain
distance, the White British
population would cease
to be the majority in the U.K. by the late 2060s.
“However, should current high levels
of immigration persist for any length of time, that
would move closer to the present. Britain would then become unrecognisable
to its present inhabitants.
“Some people would welcome a brave new
a wider world future. Others,
though, might say ‘Finis Britanniae’.”
In France, economist and fund manager Charles
pointed out that by 2057 - that is, 40
years at the very most - France and Western Europe
(which he called “Old Europe”) will have a majority nonwhite population with a Muslim majority.
“And so, within 40 years at the latest,
it is almost certain that the majority of the population
will be Muslim in Austria, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Holland,” he wrote. “Again,
these are not predictions but calculations, and I do not even call
for new immigrants.”
The pace could be accelerated given continuing Muslim migration
into France and other
Western European states,
either through regular legal processes or through
fake refugees pouring into Europe from the Middle East and North Africa.
“Our summer will
be really over the day when demographics will change, simply because
we will have become a minority in our own countries and the majority will no longer pay
attention to 68-year-old jeremiads, all of whose authors will be
retired or dead,” he wrote.
“The immense news of the next 30 or 40 years
will thus be the disappearance of the
populations, whose ancestors have created the modern world. And with these
populations will disappear the diverse and complementary European nations that
have made an immense success of the old continent for at least five centuries.”
In Australia, the same pattern is emerging. In 2016,
the most populous city in Australia, confirmed
that immigration is allowing
from the Middle East to rapidly outbreed whites.
The “fertility map,” drawn up
by social research company McCrindle, showed that many
of the most fertile suburbs in Sydney are located in migrant clusters such as Lakemba,
Auburn, Guildford, Punchbowl, and Bankstown—all popular with “families
of Middle Eastern background.”
The appearance of the report was timed with
official projections that Australia’s population
the 24 million mark next week, with the increase being almost solely
due to legal nonwhite immigration from the Middle East and Asia.
The appearance of the report came with official projections that Australia’s
going to hit 24 million mark, with the increase
being almost solely
due to legal nonwhite immigration from the
Middle East and Asia.
well-known neocon “conservative” writer
from Canada, Mark Steyn, who often
appears on shows such as those
of Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, and Sean Hannity.
According to the Daily Telegraph article, titled “Migrant birthrates are changing Australia:
Average birthrate below replacement level,” the replacement of white people
with Third Worlders
in Australia is the “biggest story
of our times, but political correctness has
stifled debate so
badly that politicians are too afraid to even talk about it.”
Steyn said politicians were underestimating how quickly societies can change.
for a population transformation you need a Black
Death, the Plague or a world war,”
he said. “But
in this case we are having it without any of that.
why it’s the most fascinating question of our times.”
The Daily Telegraph ended its online story with an editorial comment, saying
“Demographyis destiny, as the saying goes. If there
is any truth to this,
Sydney in the future will be a substantially
“Great Replacement” is therefore no myth. It is a reality, and no matter what the
liberal-left and controlled media might say, unless it is halted, it will lead to the
extermination of the white race in the Americas, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand.
"None are as hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are
free. The Truth has been kept from the depth of their Minds by Masters who
rule them with lies. They feed them
on falsehoods till wrong looks like
right in their eyes."
...Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
It was the American Jewish
Committee (AJC) which first vigorously advocated for open immigration in America beginning in 1914 until the great watershed in 1965.
Click on this text to watch The LEFT's beef with white people EXPLAINED...
Click on this text to watch America is NOT a Nation of Immigrants or a Melting Pot | The Truth About Immigration into America
Click on this text to watch Douglas Murray Interview on the Death of Europe...
Click on this text to watch Pat Condell describe how Europe Is Killing Itself...
Zionist Jews have always lobbied and legislated for open
immigration for America and this 1948 quote by former
American Jewish Congress Director, David Petegorsky,
sums it up nicely:
[he really means supremacy, not
survival] can only take place within the framework
of a progressive and
expanding democratic society,
which through its institutions and public policies,
gives expression to the concept
of cultural pluralism."
Jews had been lobbying
for open immigration since
1914, but the Immigration and Nationality Act
Amendments of 1965 (House Bill
H.R. 2580) opened the
floodgates by removing the favored nation status for
Western European nations regarding
1965, even the dreaded Russians and Chinese are
welcome in America and Jewish-Russian
has been accomplished with a vengeance.
With an influx
of Hispanics, Black African, Eastern
Europeans and Asians, the Jews were better able to
and go largely unnoticed in what was
previously a predominately White-Christian America.
America became a racial “melting pot” (a term coined by
Jewish writer Israel Zangwill
from his play, The Melting
Pot). Only not much “melting”
has occurred; only self-
imposed segregation has largely occurred.
It’s much easier to divide and influence public opinion
and eviscerate Anglo-Saxon Christian American
traditions if there are a convoluted mix of races and
cultures introduced to the land. Not to
mention the influx
of cheap labor that would be beneficial to all business
concerns, especially Jewish owned
The Zionist Jewish Americans who brought us the
immigration law of 1965 were New York Senator Jacob
Javits (D-NY), New York Congressman Emanuel Celler
(D-NY), former president of the American Jewish
Congress Leo Pfeffer, and Council of Foreign Relations
member Norman Podhoretz.
Earlier immigration reformists were Jews such
Herbert H. Lehman, who installed Harry Rosenfield as
the Executive Director of the President’s
Immigration and Naturalization, and Philip Perlman as
the Chairman in 1952.
Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish
Congress, The Jewish Federation,
the American Civil
Liberties Union, and the B’nai B’rith filed briefs in
support of open immigration
before the Senate
Subcommittee in the early 1960s leading up to the
passage of the Immigration and Nationality
Amendment of 1965.
The Immigration act of 1965 radically changed
make-up of immigration into America. Before the Act
was passed, the majority of immigrants coming
America were Western European whites from favored
nations. After the
passage of the Act, 80% of immigrants
were from non-white, non-Christian countries world-wide.
The Zionist creed calls for the non-assimilation of Jews
into the dominate
culture of the countries they choose to
live in. So by blurring the dominate culture by
introducing a myriad of
different cultures into the mix,
Zionists don’t have to assimilate into anything. Notice by
TV that there are presently and seemingly as
many African, Hispanic and Asian faces represented on
sitcoms and advertisements
as there are Anglo faces, as if
the racial numbers in America are all equal. They are not equal.
White Europeans make up 72.4%
Native Americans and Pacific Islanders 3.8%
Of course, there is interracial
that makes the percentage figures suspect.
Jews with a primary
loyalty to Israel debased White-
Christian American culture with their removal of
while Israel enjoys the most
restrictive immigration policy in the world.
Again, if you aren’t a member of the
Jewish tribe, or an adherent of Judaism,
cannot apply for Israeli citizenship... Talk
about two-faced hypocracy.
And what about the quality of immigrants? During and
especially after the Vietnam debacle, hundreds
thousands of Vietnamese were fast-tracked to American
citizenship who had sold out their own country
of birth to
side with the invasive Jewish controlled Americans
really only being exploited in the global
domination scheme, not democratizing
winning side of a civil war.
Have the Vietnamese integrated into American culture?
Not really, at least no more than any other ethnic group
that has immigrated to America either legally or
in the last half century. Many Vietnamese can be found
segregated in an area of Orange County,
Little Saigon (it’s near Disneyland and has its own
freeway exit signage).
Recently arrived Russian Jews can be found segregated
in specific areas of New York
City and Mexicans can be
found segregated in areas such as South-Central L.A.,
South Phoenix, and South
America is incorrectly touted as the “melting pot”
but the Chinese, who arrived here in the mid-19 th century,
still segregate themselves in so called
“China Towns” in
places such as L.A., San Francisco and Seattle.
Cubans segregate themselves in “Little Havana”
African Americans have their own turf the same as Hispanics.
Of course self-segregation isn’t a precise
and there are certainly spill–overs and blurred
racial divides in every American city but the segregated
are there and everyone knows where they
are and even warn visitors about which neighborhoods to avoid.
Speaking of melting pots... The Amerasian
act of Act of December 1987 provided for the
transportation from Vietnam to America, and the
subsequent assimilation, of 25,000 Vietnamese children
and young adults who had been fathered by American
The G.I.s had
abandoned their offspring upon the
conclusion of their tour of duty In Viet Nam. These
became known as the “Bui Doi Kids.”
Bui Doi is a Vietnamese term meaning “dust of life”
reference to the cast-off vagrant mixed-race street kids.
Two Jews, Claude-Michel
Schonberg and Alain
Boublil, are credited with making the term familiar after
their musical, "Miss
Saigon," became popular on Broadway
is the one we all recall as being the
Civil Rights pioneer of the 1960s but the pressure
brought to bear
on Johnson was brought by Zionist Jews
such as Arnold Aronson who was the founder and leader
of the Leadership
Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR).
The LCCR was a powerful coalition
of political and
religious groups that organized a nationwide lobbying
effort to aid passage of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. And
it was again Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler (D-
NY) who wrote and sponsored
Civil Rights legislation
signed into law in 1957 and1964.
You Gentiles by Maurice Samuel
Written in 1924, this shocking classic work of Jewish Supremacism maps
out what the avowedly Zionist author saw as
the cause of anti-Semitism through
the ages: an irreconcilable difference between Jews and all Gentiles, but Europeans
in particular. This difference, Samuel argued, was inherent and biological in origin. The author argues that the real point
of difference between Jew and Gentile is that the Gentiles follow what he calls the base “triviality”
of Gentiles versus the
God-like “seriousness” of Jews. This huge
psychological difference, Samuel says, is the reason why Jews regard “playful”
Gentiles as backward and silly, and why Gentiles will never be able to penetrate the Jewish perception of the
book goes on to discuss the main points of difference in behavior
between Jews and Gentiles focusing on physical activity,
religion, concepts of
good and evil, loyalty, science, fair play, and discipline. Maurice spells out why Jews have different
attitudes to all these moral and philosophical issues-and why these values are the opposite of those endorsed by
Samuel then says that these inherent and unchangeable differences will
always make the Jews out to be “destroyers” and
of European culture and society.
from the mouth of a Jewess__________________
Is About Getting Rid Of White People
(And That’s A Good
One of the more common memes that I’ve seen white supremacists
spread around recently has been “diversity is a
code word for white genocide”.
The concept here is that diversity is only promoted in white nations, and that the end
goal is to eliminate white people altogether by flooding all white countries with non-white people until there
are no white
people left. Well, guess what, white supremacists? That’s
exactly right. Diversity IS about getting rid of white people,
a good thing.
First off, I am a white person myself, so allow me to get that out of the way. I’m extremely glad that the
white race is dying,
and you should be too. White people do not have a right
to exist. Period. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s
true. Any white person with even the faintest knowledge of history should curse themselves every single day
for being white. Throughout all of recorded history, whites have engaged in oppression, genocide,
and just plain evil on a massive scale. White
people have denied every other race the right to exist, and have – at some point in history –
oppressed every single race on the planet.
Why, then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have
historically been the world’s #1 source of
conflict and oppression? Whiteness
is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source of all oppression in the world. Whiteness
is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism.
Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently
faces. No white people
means no oppression. White people are like a cancer and
oppression is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer
with the cancer being white people – and you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause.
I have dedicated my
life to fighting racism, and I have determined – based on all available evidence – that the only
way to really eliminate racism is to eliminate whiteness. Whiteness is the ocean from which
racism flows. Get rid of
whiteness and you get rid of racism. Despite what white
supremacists often claim, white people do not have a “culture”.
“culture” consists of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White
“culture” is racism and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white
culture”, what they’re really talking about
is racism. Over the course
of history, white people have built a massive empire based entirely on the hard work of oppressed
and disenfranchised minority groups. But guess what, white people? That empire is finally coming to an end now,
its demise is music to my hears. To quote the great anti-racist activist
Tim Wise: “Do you hear it? The sound of your
Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”
Descendants of Holocaust
survivors can personally attest to the evil that white people are capable of when they hold the
reins of power. Thankfully, whites won’t be holding the reins of power for much longer. When white people
die out, so will
racism, sexism, queerphobia, and all other forms of oppression.
The only way to eliminate racism, white privilege, and
white supremacy is to
eliminate whiteness altogether. When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory,
and the role of whites in worldwide oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone”
for the evils of whiteness
and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression.
And I tell them: you can do that by not having
any children and ensuring that
the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.
Thankfully, white birthrates are indeed very low, while the birthrates
of minorities are much, MUCH higher. Within our
lifetimes, whites will be a minority
in a significant number of formerly white countries, including the US, the UK, France,
Germany, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, to name just a few. To white supremacists yearning for the days when
whites could rape and pillage the world with impunity, this is incredibly frightening.
To people on the right side of history,
however, this looks like progress. Whites
are finally getting their just desserts – and it’s about time. I sincerely hope that,
when the white power structure finally comes crashing down, whites will receive no mercy from the minority groups
whites have spent centuries oppressing. We certainly don’t deserve
any mercy or kindness, as we have given nothing of
the sort to others.
Whites should also
know that, when they do become a minority in formerly white countries, they will NOT be receiving
affirmative action or any of the other benefits meant to assist the minorities that whites have historically oppressed.
Why? Because whites don’t deserve those benefits. It’s as simple
as that. One can look to South Africa, where whites
are only about 8.4% of the
population, but blacks continue to receive affirmative action because blacks in South Africa
have historically been disenfranchised by whites. The same thing will happen when whites become a minority in North
America, Europe, and Oceania, because whites have historically oppressed minorities in all
three of those continents.
Not to mention, why should whites receive any kind
of benefits when the ultimate goal is to get rid of whites altogether?
laws against hate speech will serve to prevent whites from complaining about this, as any white person who
complains will be arrested, given a long prison sentence, and made an example of for the rest
of the remaining white
population. Speech that attempts to justify the white
power structure and perpetuate white oppression of minorities is
of speech, and it has absolutely no place in modern society.
As white people, we all need to recognize that we no longer have a place
in the world. This world now belongs to
the minorities that us whites have spent
centuries oppressing, and there is absolutely nothing that any pathetic white
can do about it. In order for a better world to be created, white people need to be exterminated. Period.
It’s as simple as that. We should simply be thankful that our death will be accomplished
through mass immigration
and declining birthrates. When whites have exterminated
other races, it wasn’t nearly so peaceful – it was done through
genocide. But other races are not as evil as whites are, and it’s important to remember that. The world belongs
to minorities now, and they will make a much better, more peaceful world with what they’re
given. Only when white
people have ceased to exist will a peaceful and progressive
society – free of racism and hatred – be possible. The
only way to
eliminate white privilege, white oppression, white racism, and
white power structure is to eliminate white people altogether.
So, yes, white supremacists: diversity is indeed white genocide.
And white genocide is exactly what the world needs more than anything else.
While Israel sits nice and comfy behind its wall, Jewish enablers have been pushing white genocide
via replacement with hordes
of darks flooding the Euro nations of earth. Now, while this program has been in place since
the end of WWII, Jews are currently ramping
up their attacks against we whites in advertising. Just as with
population replacement, the end game of Jewish advertising is also nothing
less than our extermination.
Since returning to the US, I have done
something that I almost never did before, viz., watching a little TV. Generally after 7PM or so I will
plop down and watch a true crime program
or two. “Cold Justice,” “Cold Case Files” and “Criminal Confessions” are three of my
Unfortunately, these programs,
and all others I’ve seen, are infested with commercials. I am not talking about the local mom & pop
commercials pitching a downtown cafe or hardware
store. No, I am talking about the flashy high dollar ads of sound, color, light, and
neurotic humanoids blasting about second-by-second like crazed
cockroaches. Actually, and unlike local TV ads, these glitz and bling
Jewish productions really are there not so much to sell a product so much as they
are there to sell an idea and push a political agenda.
Although fast food, beer, glamour, shiny cars, and insurance are the surface items
being hawked on these big budget ads, one quickly
is aware that white genocide is the main object. Rarely does one of these ads pop up that is not
In these commercials concocted by large Jewish ad agencies–known
collectively as “Madison Avenue”–straight white males are always
the targets. As anyone who has
watched even a little TV knows by now, virtually all such men are portrayed as fat, fumbling, flopping fools;
as just a bunch
of bumbling bozos and buffoons who are incompetent, clumsy clowns incapable of solving even the simplest task. They
are always either
bouncing around stupidly and pointlessly from commercial to commercial, or they are standing stunned, baffled, open-mouthed
as if in a daze,
or they are stuffing vast amounts of junk food into their gorge holes. These same clueless white clods–the same,
way, whose ancestors gave us electricity, automobiles, airplanes, computers, heart transplants, and moon landings–are
in every department, intellectually, morally, socially, interactionally, and hygienically.
White men are seldom leaders in these commercials;
they are usually confused, perplexed, but willing, followers of their
betters, viz, brilliant black and brown men, and young, hard-charging
super women. Invariably, this motley menagerie,
these saviors of the day, are always neat, always clean, always intelligent, always black,
brown or female; these superior beings
merely roll their eyes in disgust at the ridiculous predicaments white men get into, then go about
showing by word
or example how the unkempt, disgusting white male moron needs to do something the right way (photo above)
Mostly, the only white men who are portrayed as bright, intelligent, slim,
clean, and successful in these ads are either gay couples or
those with dark women on their arms.
In every Jewish commercial ever created, a black or brown is never, no
matter what the situation, portrayed in a bad light, ever–in the
fantasy world of Jewish commercials,
they are always the flawless decision-makers, the sure, certain, selfless take-chargers, the best
and the brightest
mankind has to offer. They never commit the same stupid mistakes as the crude, clumsy, clueless
white men. They
are all cool, confident, well-dressed, natural-born-leader types; they are scientists, surgeons,
professors, jet pilots, or just your common
everyday successful black or brown businessman cooly making their million
dollar decisions each day inside Fortune 500 boardrooms.
White males in these commercials are often looked
at askance and lectured by blacks and browns on the proper, mature and intelligent
way of doing things even though the
ancestors of the latter, with millions of years to work with, somehow never managed to even invent
the simple wheel.
Race-mixing, of course, is the main focus of these Jewish commercials.
Virtually every other couple shown is a mixed race twosome,
usually a charming, successful, intelligent young
black man embracing, kissing and rolling happily in bed with a lovely, slim, graceful
white woman. These couples are
always portrayed as laughing, care-free, successful, and deeply in love; they are never seen as they
in reality usually
are–miserable, angry, arguing, drunken, drugged, fat, vulgar, disheveled, and violent.
In one Progressive Insurance ad, a beautiful young white woman bumps into
a black man at a juke box whereupon they fall instantly in
love. In the next shot the deeply smitten duo
are happily performing together on stage, singing to a rapturous audience. “Now That’s
reads the Jewish moral message.
fact is, despite Jews trying to convince us on their commercials that every other couple is a mixed race match, no matter
one looks in the US are mixed-race couples the norm. Left to our own devices, miscegenation would remain
forever but a tiny fraction
of the white population. If left alone, our instincts would naturally kick in and few of
us would even socialize with blacks and browns,
much less date and have sex with them. If left alone, our instincts
will naturally repel us from dark-skinned people, their strange, and to
our instincts, their ugly looks, their childish,
irresponsible actions, their impulsive, violent, primitive nature. And Jews know this. Their
hope, their dream, is to take fiction and create a new reality by portraying race-mixing as the wonderful, inevitable norm
come. Once such a consensus among the young and dumb is reached, they feel, the rest will be easy. The
non-stop commercial message
to immature minds is: “If you want to be happy, healthy, successful, then stay away from
your fellow whites, the losers, and choose for a
mate a natural winner, a dark person.” Of course, a heavily
or entirely mixed race America would nicely accomplish two of the Jew’s
greatest historical ambitions, i.e.,
1) the genocide of the white race, and 2) absolute Jewish control of the ugly, ignorant mulatto/mestizo
mess that remains.
Clearly, blacks, browns and whites do not create these commercials–Jews
do. All the above is how Jews want unthinking TV watchers
to perceive white men. Blacks and browns in
these Jewish commercials are used by Jews as they have always been used–as hammers
against we whites. Jews do not
care a fig about the well-being or elevation of blacks and browns; their sole purpose is for them to be used
as Jews have always
used them–as clubs and bricks to attack we whites.
This is how the Jews who create the ads want us and others to think about ourselves. Their hope is that ultimately
we will think so badly
about ourselves that we will no longer care about ourselves, about our past, about our present
or especially about our future, about marriage
and children, about fighting Jewish hate around the world; that we will
simply give up and commit suicide. And, of course, these devious
individuals hope their fanciful dreams become reality
for young and dumb white women and that they will naturally fall into the arms of REAL
men–the black and brown mud men.
Truly, the depth of Jewish hatred is breath-taking. But so is their
almost comical, suicidal ignorance. Sooner than they could ever imagine
the consequences of their efforts
to destroy whites via immigration replacement, inter-racial sex commercials, pornography, abortion, actual
white on white
World Wars, or a hundred other means, will bear them a terrible fruit. As we know from history, when white people finally
get pissed off, really
pissed off, hell is to pay. And, as we all know, the white world is very, very close to critical mass right now.
A word, a warning, a historical truth: An armed and angry white
man is the most deadly killing machine the earth has ever known–he is
intelligent, resourceful, adaptable,
strong as steel, hard as iron, he never sleeps, he never forgets…and he is virtually impossible to kill.
(I apologize for the rushed and rather disorganized article above.
I usually do a better job than this. The post is merely a piece written
by someone who wanted to say a
certain something but lacked the proper time to say it.)
The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail:
October 11, 2017
The Camp of the Saints
Social Contract Press, 1994
The Camp of the Saints was published nearly
45 years ago and remains one of the most prophetic
works onthe destruction ofWestern Europe due to
I first heard about this novel when it was mentioned multiple times by Steve Bannon. When describing the migrant crisis
he said, “It’s
not a migration. It’s really an invasion. I call it the Camp of the Saints.” Previously, Bannon said, “It’s
almost a Camp of the Saints-type invasion into Central and then Western
and Northern Europe.” The book’s been
mentioned several times on
Tucker Carlson Tonight, and Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)
has recommended it. (RELATED: Bannon’s Canon: A Steve Bannon Reading List)
between the novel’s story and today are uncanny. Instead of a Muslim invasion, it starts with the poor from
India. Instead of staggered migrant boats and rafts coming to Europe’s shores, it’s
a fleet of 100 ships arriving at once.
Today Eastern Europe has closed its borders
to refugees; in the novel it’s Australia. Rather
than a commie Pope Francis
from Argentina, they have a commie pope from Brazil.
The Camp of the Saints predicts our current times, when no one can be proud of their European
or try to save Western civilization without being called a racist or fined for hate speech.
The novel highlights the role of the elite liberal media and how they
use white guilt to make Europeans go against their
conscience. Anyone who
speaks against the migrants is called racist,
and even the government leaders
won’t protect their nation’s borders:
Let’s just talk about the media, so called, and the shameless way certain people, under the guise of freedom,
took a tool meant for mass communication, twisted and warped it, and used it to bully the minds
of the public.
General of Belgium tries to fight for Europe. “Your damned, obnoxious, detestable pity!” he yells at his
leaders. “Call it what you please: world brotherhood, charity, conscience
. . . Can’t you see where it’s leading? . . .
You’ve got to
be out of your minds just to sit back and let it all happen, little by little.
because of your pity. Your insipid, insufferable pity!”
The message of the book is clear: Christian morality will be the downfall of the West, so long
as it continues to be interpreted
as a religion of meekness, whose adherents
must roll over and give their countries away to people who want to rob,
and kill them. This is in contrast to most of its history, when Christians wanted to defend
the kingdom of Christendom to preserve their values and religion for future generations.
In The Camp of the Saints, a fleet of 100 boats carrying 800,000 migrants leaves India’s shores with no clear destination.
They’re rumored to be headed toward France (the author, Jean Raspail, is French) but the country has
time to decide what to do. As requests pour in to take the migrants,
the pleas “[seem] more like threats.”
Journalists take the side of the migrants, claiming they’ll “enrich, cleanse and redeem the Capitalist
West.” Photos that
would sway public opinion negatively toward the refugees
are kept out of the press. Every horrid thing the refugee
fleet does is twisted
into something noble in the mainstream media, and just like today, it’s always the fault of the Europeans.
Editorial cartoons depict the white president
of South Africa torturing a poor Hindu, an attempt to guilt the country to take
the migrants. Protests erupt at South African embassies throughout Europe. South Africa threatens to fire on the boats
they come to their shores, and the country is spared. (The novel was
published 20 years
before the end of apartheid, and assumes whites still maintain
the schools, liberal teachers make students pen essays about sad and suffering refugees who need help. Parents
keep their mouths shut, not wanting to burden their little children with the truth about the
crisis. Meanwhile, no matter
what subject is taught—math, literature,
fill students’ heads with ideas about the racist
refuses the migrant fleet, young people in European cities take to the Australian embassies to protest
their migrant ban, chanting “Racists, Fascists!” The only difference with
today’s protests is that in the novel, the protestors are actually peaceful.
When someone does take a stand against the insanity, it’s done in
a mealy-mouthed way
that will inspire no one to action: “perhaps it wouldn’t
be terribly wise, just now.”
the migrants’ arrival on France’s southern shores becomes imminent, residents flee to the north. An old
professor, Calgues, remains on the shores of the Mediterranean in
his ancestral home from 1673. A hippie shows up
and delights in telling Calgues
how he’ll bring the migrants to use his antique furniture for firewood, to “crap all over your
terrace, and wipe their hands on your shelves full of books.” Why will they do this?
Because the world of Calgues, the
world of Western civilization, with thousands
of years of literature, mathematics, philosophy, music, art, and culture,
nothing to them. The Left-wing hippie hates being white and despises “squares” like his middle-class parents
and sisters, who fled north for fear of being raped. Though the phrase “white privilege”
he’s anxious for his white family to be impoverished,
just like the brown people of the earth.
After the migrants arrive, they spread throughout France.
join up with them, along with Left-wing anarchists.
Residents in one small town have to stop using their community swimming pool; the migrants are spreading gonorrhea
to the town’s children in the water. Medical records of all the citizens are checked,
so as to not be racist to the Arabs, and
in the end it’s confirmed that
the newcomers are spreading it. The townspeople want to require medical certificates before
entering the pool to protect the children. How does the news react? With headlines proclaiming “Anti-Arab
and Well!” Caving to social pressure, the town abandons the
required medical screenings. The European
natives abandon the pool they scrimped
and saved to pay for, and Arabs get the run of it.
Meanwhile, the wife of a prominent pro-refugee journalist is gang-raped, then commits suicide.
White women are kidnapped
and raped in brothels. The situations predicted by
Raspail more than 40 years ago are being played out in Europe today,
in the Rotherham child rape gang cover-up and countless other crimes. Just like today, laws are
passed against what’s
now called “hate speech.” And also like today, everything is the fault of whites:
Now, it’s a known fact that racism comes in two forms:
that practiced by whites—heinous and inexcusable,
whatever its motives—and that
practiced by blacks—quite justified, whatever its excesses, since it’s
expression of a righteous revenge, and it’s up to the whites to be patient and understanding.
Meanwhile in New York City, the migrants have arrived. The city is taken
over by the sounds of an “infernal symphony”
of glass shattering,
gunshots, and screaming. Woe to the car that stops at a light; soon it will “find itself buried in a sea
of black silhouettes, brandishing picks; and then the shouts of no! no! no!, those desperate
shouts shrieked into the
darkness and suddenly stilled, snuffed out by a knife,
a razor, a chain, by a club full of spikes, by a pounding fist, or
or phallus …” There’s a new wave of white flight out to American suburbs as people try to flee the crime
and poorly performing schools.
It’s easy to see
why The Camp of the Saints is recommended by so many on the Right. Besides its colorful prose,
prescience is astounding when it comes to the effects of third-world immigration on the West.
Since The Camp of the Saints is from the 1970s, it’s refreshing to read something completely non-PC. And despite the
depressing subject matter, made doubly so due to us living a Camp of the Saints scenario today, his memorable characters
create some laugh-out-loud moments.
Click on this text to read THE CAMP OF THE SAINTS
"If all of the dead allied
soldiers could see their countries now, they would have
thrown down their weapons and fought with the Germans." - David Irving
Jews Behind Race Mixing
By: Dr. Edward R. Fields
Jew Civil Rights Bill Author — Jacob Javits
Race-Mixing in America
The Answers Are Complex
Here Are the Facts
From Their Own Mouths — The Jews
Reveal Their Plans
Jews Raise Money for Blacks
Lawyers for Militants Are Jews
Jews Urge White Christians
to Marry Blacks but Urge Own Kind to Marry Jews Only
Different Story for Jews
Don’t Date Non-Jews
Why the Jews Seek the Mongrelization of the White Christian People
Self-Hate Instilled Within Whites
Guilty of Negroes’ Crimes
New Jersey’s Little Riot Commission
Communist Party Fought for Race Mixing
Millionaire Jews Back the Black Revolution
NAACP — A Jewish Organization
Jew Civil Rights Bill Author — Emanuel Celler
Sen. Jacob Javits
(above) at a dinner given by the Joint Defense Appeal, a Jewish Fund raising organization, at the
Hotel Plaza, in N.Y. on Oct. 24, 1957, called on President Eisenhower to name
the members of the CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION called
for under the new Civil Rights Law.
At the time Javits was running for the U.S. Senate,
there was much ado about his Red-front associations.
Cong. Emanuel Celler and Sen. Jacob Javits,
were the authors of the infamous; Civil Rights Bill.
JEWS BEHIND RACE-MIXING IN AMERICA
The purpose of this article is to prove, through documented evidence that
Jews in America are the prime movers
and guiding force behind the massive attempt
to mongrelize the White Christian people with the Black Race.
Of course everyone realizes that there are many gullible
and brainwashed Gentiles working toward this same end.
But the movement to mix the races in America is most definitely sparked
and financed by
organized Jewry in every city of any size in America containing
a formal Jewish community.
The first question which arises is why are the Jews so fanatical in their zeal to integrate the
why do they intensely resist mixing of their own blood
with either us White Christians, or the Blacks?
THE ANSWERS ARE COMPLEX
In order to understand Jewish thinking on this matter, one must first recognize
that the Jews are a very unique people.
The Jews are bound to one another by three different means— which no other people in the
world have in common.
The Jews have one religion—Judaism!
The Jews are of one nation—Israel!
The Jews are of one Race!
Race is defined as a group of people who have inbred with their own kind for centuries
and exhibit like features and
characteristics. Thus the Jews of today are a tight-knit
race, and highly conscious of the great gulf which separates
them from White
do not have even the basic rudiments of unity existing in Jewry. We are of many different churches, different
nationalities and from divided language groups of Europe. Feuds, wars, jealousy and hatreds
have always divided our White Folk.
This division has made it easy, for a skillful and highly organized Jewish minority to dominate
anyone is in doubt about Jewish control over our daily lives, let them check on who owns all the stores on Main Street.
Find out who controls the three T. V. Networks. (Sarnoff heads
NBC, Paley (Palensky) heads CBS and David Goldenson heads ABC.)
Check who controls
Hollywood, or which racial group controls many of the giant combines
interest in thousands of formerly Christian owned companies in America!
HERE ARE THE
each Jewish Community in every city of any size in America the Jews operate numerous organizations.
They are designed to guide and control the lives of every Jew. They are also constructed to give the Jews a tremendously
powerful single voice in American politics. Almost every Christian
politician lives in dread of offending his local Jewish
community. He knows that
if he does not tread softly, listen to their every demand, endorse aid to Israel and sale of Israeli
Bonds, support United Jewish Appeal—the Jews will vote for the man against him, spend a fortune
to elect his next opponent, and direct the local daily press in a hate campaign
the small Jewish clubs and social groups are united under the American Jewish Committee. All Jew businessmen
belong to a secret society called “B’nai B’rith”
and they have their own secret spy agency called the “Anti-Defamation League.”
These are the groups that harass Right-Wing Patriots and seek to control elected politicians
and the daily press.
But, their most important mission of all, is to integrate
the White Christian people to produce an indolent, Mulatto race for the future.
OWN MOUTHS — THE JEWS REVEAL THEIR PLANS
The following are especially selected quotes from the most important
Jewish leaders in America concerning the integration of the races.
Aaron Goldman addressing the National Council of
Jewish Women said:
“We Jews have
played a significant part in securing laws for Negroes that guarantee equality. We have raised the
expectations of American Negroes and must not allow them to become frustrated, angry, and
desperate if their dreams fail to materialize. The Negro must enter the mainstream of American
Mrs. Joseph Willen, president of the National Council of Jewish Women
reported on April 9, 1968 that:
“Jewish parents must intensify their fight in behalf of the American Negro’s
struggle for racial justice and economic opportunity.
Our children ask us to look forward, not backward. We cannot
bind our young people to us by reciting past persecutions.
We must set an example far Jewish youth
by intensifying efforts in behalf of increased employment
and to aid anti-poverty programs. This is the best way to combat White backlash.”
Sen. Jacob Javits addressing
the National Commission
of the Jewish Anti-Defamation
League in 1967 said:
“The Negroes’ struggle for
equal rights is of vital importance to American Jews,
and is the most
important struggle in the United States.
support of the Negroes’ aspirations for equality should be
as a badge of honor.”
Sen. Javits called for massive aid to Negroes and asked
for the taxpayers to provide $35 billion over the next 10 years
raise the Black man up to the level of Whites. He also called for the adoption
of a guaranteed annual wage at double the amount called for by President Nixon.
Philip M. Klutznick, Vice-President
of the Anti-Defamation League at the same convention said:
“Jewish communities have set the pattern in the area of ‘social action’ in America. The outpouring
of Federal funds for
poverty programs during the next 25 years will
give the Jewish community an opportunity to redistribute their resources
and redirect their energies in the most meaningful religious, cultural and special educational activities for Jews that
history has ever known. Major Jewish organizations must unite to set up long range survey
to establish the goals and priorities of American Jewish
communities over the next three decades.”
(IMPORTANT NOTE: Readers should re-read this last paragraph. Jews
run the poverty aid and urban renewal programs
in many cities. It is not an admission
that this tax money is being used by Jews to build political power for Jews).
Saul M. Linowitz, former ambassador to the Organization
of American States,
told the Zionist woman’s order, Hadassah
at its 53rd meeting at Miami Beach:
bedrock for civil rights is nothing less than economic rights, school integration and the right to vote.”
SAUL ALINSKY Trains Black revolutionists.
Rabbi Arthur J. Lelyveld,
addressing last year’s American Jewish Congress meeting in Miami Beach said:
“All of us must be prepared to make any sacrifice necessary
to achieve an effective program aimed at achieving economic
for the negro. We must make the economic sacrifice of paying higher taxes to win the more important war on poverty at home.”
Abe Fortas, (removed from the Supreme Court for taking bribes from the corrupt Jew financier,
Louis Wolfson) told a dinner of the American Jewish Committee
in July of 1968 in New York City:
battles of the non-Whites for equality in America are essentially the same as those of the Jew, and the Jews must help in
Albert Vorspan, addressing the National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods in Miami
Beach on Oct. 28, 1969, said:
should know something about the outer limits of frustration and rage of the Black Communities.
We who have suffered better understand the anguish of the Black man today.”
MAX FISHER Millionaire Jew Republican finances Black Militants.
Theodore Bikel, Jewish folk singer and star in the play, “Fiddler
On The Roof”
in a speech of July, 1969, in a Jewish temple
in Honolulu said:
“A strong commitment
to civil rights is implicit in Judaism.
speak out against discrimination.”
Rabbi Maurice N. Eisendrath, president
of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations,
on Oct. 26, speaking
inMiami Beach called for a five year moratorium on the space program and an
ceasefire in Vietnam.The rabbi said this would free billions of tax dollars which could be
immediately funneled into the Black ghetto:
it reparations or simple justice, but some form of restitution is owed to the Negro.
America must rush massive aid to the Negro the way aid has been rushed to the Jews of Israel.”
JEWS RAISE MONEY FOR BLACKS
Jewish publications are filled with countless articles about Jews raising
money for militant negro causes. The Emma Lazarus Federation
in New York City raised thousands of dollars for Martin Luther King’s now infamous Selma, Alabama march.
Each year Mrs. Edward M. Warburg, wife of the multi-millionaire international
Jewish banker, raises millions for the United Negro College Fund.
The most sensational and publicized fund raising dinner was held by wealthy
Leonard Bernstein in his plush Park Avenue
apartment for the
21 Black Panthers on trial for bombings in New York City. It was a sight to behold, in Bernstein’s
elegant duplex apartment, the Jewesses in evening gowns, welcoming Black Panthers wearing
wild beards, bushy
Afro-hair styles and blue jeans.
The wife of the famous director of the New
York Philharmonic, Mrs. Bernstein said later to the press:
“This was not a frivolous party, but a chance for all of us to hear what’s
happening to them. They’ve really
been treated very inhumanely.
The trial of the 21 New York Black Panthers has had me very upset.”
Here we have the rich affluent left-wing, whose children all go to exclusive
private schools, consorting with the
Black militant radicals who are out to destroy
this nation. Mr. and Mrs. Leonard Bernstein
personally made out a check for $12,000
to help the Black Panthers at the dinner.
Two other fund raising parties have been held in New York by
millionaire Jews to raise money for the murderous Black Panthers.
Simon, a Jew editor at T.V. panelist Bennet Cerf’s Random House Publishers,
gave a similar party, as did Jew film director Sidney Lumet.
LAWYERS FOR MILITANTS ARE JEWS
In almost every case of radical militants who are caught burning, killing and bombing, we find
Jewish lawyers ready to
defend them. Eldridge Cleaver, who fled
the U. S. to escape prison was represented by the Jew Charles Garry.
The New York 21 are defended by the Jews Gerald
B. Lefcourt and Sanford Katz. Of course everyone knows that the
“Chicago Seven” (4 were Jews) revolutionaries were defended by the Jew legal team of Leonard
Weinglass and William Kunstler.
JACK GREENBERG, lawyer who heads NAACP legal fund
explains how busing should take place in Houston, Texas.
Jew lawyers are also pushing for integration
of White suburbs. A Harvard trained lawyer
named Roger N. Beilenson
heads “Westchester Residential Opportunities, Inc.”
They purchase homes in fine White neighborhoods for $16,000 up to $50,000
re-sell them to Blacks. Beilenson was a former housing director for
the Urban League.
Both the Rockefeller Foundation and (Jew) Aaron Norman Foundation
have given tax free grants to further his work.
“The New York Times” of Sept. 19,
1966, really let the cat out of the bag when it admitted:
“The Jewish community has long been the financial backbone of the civil rights movement.
… No special commission on
race is needed to arouse Jewish support
for civil rights activity in the South. … Jewish support for civil rights is still high.”
And, of course, we
all know that Jack Greenberg is the head of the NAACP Legal Fund and is responsible for filing all
of the suits which have resulted in so much suffering by innocent White children forced into
mixed schools by this Jewish conspiracy.
JEWS URGE WHITE CHRISTIANS TO MARRY
BLACKS BUT URGE OWN KIND TO MARRY JEWS ONLY
Rabbi Abraham Feinberg of Canada has won the nickname, “The Red Rabbi”
for his visits to North Vietnam
and efforts on behalf of communist causes. In
the Maclean’s Review magazine of Sept. 5, 1967 he states:
“Until we learn to fight our ingrown fears of sexual relationsbetween the
the end of the race problem will not bein sight. Only when we
no longer raise our eyebrows
at the sight of a Negro holding handswith
a White girl will the West have begun to tear
the racial poison
from its vitals.
a change will involve an inside-out remodelling of the White psyche, for our fear of
mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change must begin sometime. Why not now!
If anything, the law should encourage, not forbid, the intermingling
of ‘bloods’. Marches and civil-rights demonstrations can
dramatize the immediate imperative of justice. Religious
teaching can now enunciate the challenge of brotherhood.
Fair-employment laws and other civil rights legislation
can protect minorities from overt discrimination.”
Plan for the Future
“The great ideal of Judaism. … is that the whole world shall be
imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a
Universal Brotherhood of
Nations—a greater Judaism, in fact—all the separate races and religions shall disappear.”
— from the Jewish World, 9th Feb. 1883
WORLD, ONE RACE … the deliberate encouragement of
marriages is the only way to hasten this process.
And it may be that
time is growing short. The dominance of our world has begun
like cargo in a listing vessel, from the White races to the colored.”
Thus Rabbi Feinberg urges our White Christian people to
surrender the blood of our forefathers
and commit racial suicide by helping mongrelize
the White race through interracial marriage!
DIFFERENT STORY FOR JEWS
Here we find the great contradiction in
While preaching the most extreme forms of race-mixing at inter-religious meetings and on college campuses in the
on T.V. and Hollywood, the Jews tell their own youth a completely different
story in the confines of the Synagogue.
Dr. Immanuel Jakobovits, Chief Rabbi of England, said in the “New
education must cover youths between 13 and 18”.
He said that unless
they are warned of the dangers of inter-marriages:
whole fabric of the Jewish structure will suffer irreparable harm and damage.”
Rabbi Pesach Z. Levovitz,
president of the Rabbinical
Council of America said
in the “New York Times,” Jewish;
“religious leaders must exercise all of their influence to stop mixed marriages between Jews and non-Jews.
Those who marry out of the faith disappear within the preponderant
Christian religions and cultural community.”
DON’T DATE NON-JEWS
England’s Chief Rabbi, Immanuel
made a visit to New York, and in point blank terms
“Jewish teenagers shouldn’t date
non-Jews. … Interfaith marriage is something we view with horror, almost as apostasy.
For Jews the problem of intermarriage is the problem of sheer survival. Countless
Jewish martyrs did not die for their faith so that we might fritter away our heritage.”
We would like to ask
the rabbi; What about White Christians whose countless ancestors fought and died so that our race
might be preserved? Is not the blood line of our people worth saving in the light of the importance the Jews place
question? The Jews are not called “bigots” and “race
prejudiced” when they fight against inter-marriage for their own kind.
these same leftist Jews attack and vilify every White Christian who dares stand up for racial purity for our folk.
JOSEPH POGÁNY alias SCHWARTZ.
A FAMOUS JEW who came to America from Moscow in 1928 to
write the first Civil Rights platform for the U. S. Communist Party.
DAVID GINSBURG. Wrote Riot Commission Report
charging Whites were responsible for Negro riots.
WHY THE JEWS SEEK THE MONGRELIZATION
OF THE WHITE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE
The most cleverly contrived scheme in the history of race relations is now being employed by the Jews to break
the resistance of the White race. It is an elaborate plan to make White
people ashamed of the color of our skin.
It is deliberately designed to give
us an inferiority complex whereby we will feel compelled to bring
about our own
racial destruction to rectify the superior position we naturally hold over the Black race.
It is even more clearly spelled out in a
book written back in 1912 by a Communist theoretician named Israel Cohen
of London, England. It is titled, “A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century”
and has been published in the
Congressional Record of
June 7, 1957, and even entered as a paid ad some years ago in the Atlanta
by Gov. Lester Maddox (then a prominent restaurant owner). Israel Cohen wrote:
“We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon
is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of
the dark races
that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program
of the Communist Party. The terms colonialism and imperialism must be featured in our propaganda.
In America, we
will aim for a subtle victory. While inflaming the negro minority against the Whites,
we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation
of the Negroes.
We will aid the negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of
entertainment. With this prestige, the negroes will be able
to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will
America to our cause.”
SELF-HATE INSTILLED WITHIN WHITES
This is the most diabolical plan ever conceived,
to instill “self-hate” within White people
so that we will
embrace the Black race in order to “up-lift” them to our level (an impossibility).
The plan goes much further and is a master hoax fostered by Jews upon our people.
CHARGE WHITES GUILTY OF NEGROES’
of 1968 Lyndon Johnson’s “Commission on Civil Disorder” issued
their report on the bloody and destructive
negro riots which swept many of our
major cities that previous summer. The full time staff director of the Commission
the Jew David Ginsburg. With a $1 million dollar budget, and 200 employees Ginsburg
spent 7 months ‘investigating’ the riots. The final report, which he personally drafted found:
“Of the filth, crime and slums in which the Negro lives, White
institutions created it, White institutions maintain it,
condones it — White racism is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture which has been
accumulatingin our cities since the end of World War II.”
The crux of the million dollar report was that —
WE WHITE PEOPLE ARE TO BLAME FOR THE NEGRO RIOTS!
Many Americans openly expressed their outrage at Ginsburg’s findings.
But most people missed the real point in question,
that this was a brazen
attempt to instill an inferiority complex in masses of White Christian Americans in one grand sweep.
We are supposed to
feel guilty for the oppression Blacks have experienced in the past. Now we should want to throw
ourselves at the feet of the negroes and beg for their forgiveness. The Jews would like for our vast masses to
attitude of the young White girl from San Francisco, whose story was
reported in The Thunderbolt. She said she was
for a negro man to marry, so that in her own individual way she could try to make up some of the oppression Negroes had suffered.
Of course the truth
of the story is that the American negro has a far higher standard of living than negroes have in
ANY of their own countries in Africa. We do not owe the Black man anything. In fact the negro has shown us the
height of ingratitude to the fact that we lifted them out of jungle savagery, gave them sanitary
homes for the first time,
jobs, welfare,free medical care, poverty aid and free
David Ginsburg says that we have not done enough.
His Riot Commission Report advocates raising the negro to
a real life of luxury by the following methods:
- The spending of $10 billion a
year on poverty aid and welfare.
- Create 2 million federal jobs for Blacks. Guarantee every negro
- Provide a Guaranteed annual wage to all negroes who do not want to work.
- Build 6 million new dwellings for negroes in White suburbs with either subsidized or free rent.
This is Ginsburg’s plan to chain the White
worker to a lifetime of tax slavery to make
the negro an elite class of citizens
to whom we third class Whites owe a free living.
NEW JERSEY’S LITTLE RIOT COMMISSION
Also in 1968, former New Jersey Gov. Richard J. Hughes appointed
a “blue ribbon” committee to investigate the
riots. Once again a Jew named Sanford Jaffe, wound up as executive director of this commission.
You guessed it, he also found that White people were guilty of the crimes of the blacks!
even insane, yet when you control the news media, you can
make the right seem wrong and change lies into truth.
The Jaffe Commission found the following:
- National Guardsmen used excessive force in shooting
rioters and looters.
- Police antagonize negroes, thus encouraging them to disorder.
- More Black police are needed as well as civilian review boards.
- Elimination of bail
is needed so negroes can be released from jail with less difficulty.
- (following point is quoted
word for word because it is so hard to believe anyone would claim this:)
“Widespread violence in the nation’s urban slums would have happened sooner had not the Negro been
patient and forbearing.”
- Jaffe’s final point absolved the negro of any blame
for the riots and said there was no organized conspiracy behind the rioting.
PARTY FOUGHT FOR RACE MIXING
The 1928 Civil Rights Program of the U. S. Communist Party was written by Joseph
Pogany. This was the
first [party] in America to adopt a civil rights
program and the major parties copied them after World War Two.
Pogany was a Jew, born in Moscow and sent to America in 1928 to help build
the U. S. Communist Party. Using
the alias Joseph
Schwartz, he wrote the following program which the Reds adopted and distributed all over America.
1928 COMMUNIST PARTY PROGRAM
- Abolition of the whole system
of race discrimination and insure full racial equality.
- Insure Negroes the right to vote.
- Abolish all Jim Crow laws and forbid discrimination against Negroes in selling or renting houses.
- Abolish all laws forbidding intermarriage of persons of different races.
- Assure full
integration of public schools and universities.
- Equal admittance of Negroes to railway stations,
waiting rooms, hotels, restaurants and theatres.
- Full integration of the Army and Navy.
- Allow negroes to join all labor unions.
- Equal employment opportunity for Negroes.
Every single one of the Jew Pogany’s original Platform points have
adopted and put in force by both of the Jew influenced Democratic
and Republican Parties.
MILLIONAIRE JEWS BACK THE BLACK
people find it difficult to understand how a millionaire Jew can be a staunch supporter of the Black Militant
Communist Revolution. It is because of their Jewish nature according to one of the richest
Jews in America, Max
Fisher of Detroit. Max Fisher owns the Marathon
Oil Co. and the Fisher Theater chain. He sits on the board of
directors of Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. and Michigan Bell Telephone Co., is
chairman of Fruehauf Trucking Co.,
a director in Allen
Industries and Safran Printing Co. and a partner in
huge $150 million Somerset Park apartment project in Troy, Michigan.
Being a militant revolutionary has not stopped him from declaring himself
a Republican, and he is George Romney’s
chief campaign fund raiser. He
recently represented President Nixon at a meeting of Jewish leaders in New York City.
He told them Nixon had assured him Israel
would receive all the aid she needs. On the negro question,
no one can claim
to be more radical than Max Fisher, who the “Detroit News” of Feb. 23, 1969
“My fellow Jews must enter the great
American Equal Rights Revolution. The growth of the Black Power concept is
healthy because there was no leadership before. Militancy and turmoil are good, because it shows that the Negro is
himself concerned and involved. We are in a revolution and the Negro has to be allowed
to develop. I think that
through my Jewishness I have a feeling of what
the Negro wants. It comes from an empathy that springs from my Jewishness.”
Or take the Jew Saul Alinsky whose activities
are financed by the Jew owned Midas Muffler Co. Alinsky heads a radical
group called F.I.G.H.T. They led riotous picketings and demonstrations by Blacks demanding jobs
at the Kodak
Film Co. in Rochester, N. Y. They
succeeded in blackjacking the company into giving them hundreds of jobs.
Alinsky now operates a school for Black revolutionaries— still financed
by the Jewish owned Midas Muffler Corp. Recently he said:
“Just think of all the hell we kicked up in the past with only
four or five
organizers. Now we will be turning them out by the hundreds.”
NAACP — A JEWISH ORGANIZATION
Last but not least is the NAACP. The largest and best financed
of all the groups fighting
for the mongrelization of the White race. This organization
has never had a negro as its head.
For the first 35 years of the NAACP’s formal existence it was run by two millionaire
Jewish brothers. Joel Spingarn
was president of the NAACP from
1920 until his death in 1939. Thereupon his brother Arthur Spingarn ran it until
1966. Due to old age, he turned the presidency over to Kivie Kaplan, a millionaire Jew shoe manufacturer
Boston, Mass. He heads it to this day. Roy Wilkins is merely
his secretary and front dressing for the outer office.
The real mastermind behind the NAACP’s massive legal offensive which is almost
solely responsible for the destruction
of all the South’s laws and traditions
keeping the races separate, including all the major school mixing
were suits brought by Jack Greenberg, Jewish head of the NAACP Legal and Defense Fund.
The Jews visualize themselves in a never
ending cold war with the White Christian people. They know that we are an
and freedom loving people. The Jew knows that our individualism springs from the restless creative
spirit of our race. They know that eventually our White race will revolt
Jewish economic, cultural and racial domination of our people.
They have but one hope, to put the White race to sleep through assimilation
with the lazy, mindless, leaderless,
shiftless and slave-like Negro race. As
Mulattoes our future descendants would make obedient workers under Jewish masters.
The Jews are organized to prevent assimilation of their
racial blood with either us White Christians or the Blacks.
They stand to be the only race in the future which will be mentally
alert if mongrelization conquers our unborn descendants to come.
We are now, TODAY in a life and death STRUGGLE
for racial survival. We are faced by a tight knit, political machine
hell bent upon using its money power to destroy our White Folk. The time has come for every White man, woman
and child in America to take his stand. The National States Rights Party
provides our fellow
White brothers with the best fighting attack program in existence
to defeat this evil conspiracy.
Remember that your life upon this earth is but a very short one. We are placed here to create a decent and wholesome
society in which our children can be raised and propagate. It is our duty to
race separate so as to provide for the everlasting continuation of future
is our God given mission upon this earth. Are you doing your part while there is yet still time to preserve the White race?
It is a task more important than your personal life itself. Sacrifice and struggle lie ahead
and we must be prepared to give
our all for the SALVATION of God’s real
‘Chosen People’, —The White Race. Our White Race is
for the concepts of Liberty and Civilization which we have given to the entire world.
Always remember the following quotation from the late Sen. Theodore
who fought all his life to maintain the separation of the races:
“If our buildings, our highways, our railroads should be wrecked, we
could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed,
out of the very
ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed
should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power.
But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present
greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all
hope for civilization would be as impossible for
a negroid America as
would be redemption and restoration of the White man’s blood which had been mixed with that of the negro.”
RIGHTS BILL AUTHOR
Congressman “Manny” Emanuel Celler (above),
Zionist Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee is one of the
boastful authors and defenders of the infamous Celler “CIVIL RIGHTS BILL,” which was prepared
as part of the plan. to disorganize and condition the U.S. for the Communist take-over.
He gave a “BOYCOTT
AMERICANS” speech in the House of Representatives on Aug. 28, 1957, which appears in
the Congressional Record of Sept. 11, 1957, on page A-7475. It seems
he is more concerned with the welfare of ISRAEL than that of the U.S.
Click on this text to watch "Immigration and the Old Indian Trick"...
In a normal world, the daily
"Google-Doodle" of March 31, 2017 would have infuriated
Whitelandia. But because the West has ceased being normal, few
will see anything wrong
with the subversive
messaging. Notice how the Jewish girl is positioned front & center --
the obvious ringleader. The Jewess is flanked by a Muslim girl
and a South Indian tranny.
The three White males
are castoff to the far sides -- two of them are crippled and one of
them is a one-armed homosexual (as evidenced by the rainbow Google logo G on his
logo turned rainbow "gay" in 2015.The logo for Google Chrome is 6-6-6.
some sort of logo on their shirt -- indicating that they belong to some greater
group or cause -- except for the two non-smiling, isolated
and crippled White boys who are
barely dangling on
either end. They are nothing. The lone partially White-Hispanic Christian
girl is sandwiched between the Indian tranny and the
tall Black boy she will "hook up with"
as the dispossessed pathetic little White boy with the cane looks on helplessly. She has no
suitable White partners to marry or to mate with
here because all of the White boys are either
lame or queer. Notice how the horizontal portion of the cross on her shirt is faded. And also
notice how the Black boy is portrayed as the math genious
with a portion of Einstein's fake
equation written on his sweater.
In the background, a
shadowy mob flashes devil's horn signs. Wow! Jewish-run Google's message
couldn't possibly be anymore "in-your-face" than this
-- "Die, White Man, die!" It is indeed the Satanic
"Kalergi Plan" -- a long term scheme based upon genocidal
hatred of European Man.
The visual tactic of isolating
an idiot White guy to the far end of a "diverse" group is commonly
used in the Jewish-dominated ad world -- as
in the ATT television ad (above left) in which every
character has a speaking part except for the White male who just
makes stupid faces throughout.
Richard Coudenhove Kalergi
Kalergi was the son of an Austrian diplomat named
Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi
and a Japanese woman named Mitsu Aoyama. His movement
was financially backed by
Zionist billionaire bosses
such as Rothschild, Baruch and Warburg.
With such high-
powered backers and close contacts
with European aristocrats and politicians, Kalergi
managed to attract important heads of state to his project for European integration
what Winston Churchill
openly referred to, in 1945, as the "United States of Europe."
people know that Kalergi, one of the main "founding fathers" of the process
of European integration,
also designed the genocide for the peoples of Europe. As
far back as 1922, Kalergi founded the "Pan-European"
movement in Austria, which
to create a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration
would be the first step in creating a future
With the rise of Benito Mussolini in Italy, The Great One
in Germany and General
Franco in Spain, Kalergi's Jewish-inspired 'One Europe' project
on hold. But very soon after the final crushing
defeat of Germany in 1945, Kalergi's
New World Order, thanks to the support of Winston Churchill,
the Jewish B'nai B'rith
and major newspapers like the New York Slimes, began to take its first visible steps
In order for Kalergi's openly-described
New Europe to rise, European Fascism had to fall.
And THAT is what World War II was really all
about! Read 'The Bad War', by M S King
In his book 'Praktischer
Idealismus', Kalergi boldly declares that the citizens of the future
"United States of Europe" will not
be White people anymore. In his own words:
"The man of the future will be of mixed race. The
races and classes of today will gradually
disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The
of the future, similar
in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of
peoples with the diversity of individuals.
course, Kalergi's chosenite paymasters will not be replaced or
blended out by this
"Eurasian-negroid race of the future". Writes
the hired hack of his paymasters:
"Instead of destroying European Judaism,
Europe, against her will, refined and educated
this people, driving them to their future status as a leading
nation through this artificial
evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people
that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison,
became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the
compassionate care given by Europe
created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European
because of the emancipation of the Jews."
George Soros, "Sir" Evelyn & "Lord" Jacob de Rothschild,
In Kalergi's World, by his own admission, Whites
are to be blended out of their own nations
while the Jew becomes "the spiritual nobility." Is
that not exactly what we
are witnessing today? Ah, show us the shekels, Count K, show us the
The Kalergi plan is the New World Order plan. White
genocide, as the "Google-Doodle"
makes very clear, is very real and is playing out exactly as Kalergi and his handlers
envisioned it. That is the real reason why World
War II was imposed upon Hitler and
Mussolini; and it is also the real reason why the Marshall Plan contained hidden
provisions for unifying Europe; and
it is also the reason why the Frumpy Frau of
Germany is acting as "stupidly" as she is. Speaking of manly Marxist Merkel;
for her slavish devotion to Rothschild's European Unionism,
the wicked wench received
"prestigious" Charlemagne Prize in 2008 --- mistakenly referred to by some
"Kalergi Prize" because Kalergi was its very first recipient in 1950.
Besides Kalergi and Merkel, other notable recipients of this treasonous "honor"
Winston Churchill (1956), George Marshall (1959),
Henry Kissinger (1987),
Queen Beatrix of The
Netherlands (1996), Tony Blair (1999), Bill
Jean Claude Juncker (2006),
Donald Tusk (2010) and Poop Francis (2016).
Talk about a rogue's gallery
of Globalist scumbags in service to Satan!
The Rape of Finland:
Multiculturalism Gone Mad
F. Roger Devlin, PhD
The Occidental Observer
Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
As Muslim gangs run amok in an orgy of rape and murder, questions are being asked:
Who is behind the plot of out-of-control mass immigration?
other countries are on the hit list of the People Destroyers?
“A 2018 study by the Finnish Police Academy found that 93% of rapes in Finland in
2016 had been committed by men from Islamic countries.” — Roger Devlin, PhD. (See also here)
Finns enjoy an unusually high-trust society. Longtime
British resident Ed Dutton describes
unmanned roadside vegetable stands that operate on the
honor system, with customers
reliably leaving the correct price for what they take. Travelers
need not purchase a ticket
before boarding a train; everyone happily pays the conductor as he
comes through. At
least until recently, girls in outlying villages could safely hitchhike into
larger towns on Saturday nights.
Oulu (pronounced Oh-loo)
is the largest city in northern Finland.
It tends to be a dull place, and residents like it that
“Very little crime, very little conflict;
very little to report: Everyone eating the same
kind of food, wearing the
same kind of clothes, following the same cultural
traditions: trusting, safe,
predictable. The perfect place to raise a child.”
By 2005, however, the city had begun accepting small numbers of Muslim ‘refugees.’ That summer,
“a 30-year-old worker for the Finnish Lutheran Church had been
to get talking to a group of Muslim men in a bar and, worse
still, go back to their
flat. She was rewarded for her friendliness towards
these guests by having
her clitoris cut off with a pair of scissors which were
then inserted into her vagina.”
the next couple of years, several local women were raped by Muslim men in city parks.
the trend was being reported in a national tabloid—which, however, failed to mention
all of the assaults had been carried out by Middle Eastern men. Oulu’s local daily,
stopped reporting perpetrators’ names. As in other Western countries, Finnish
tend to be aggressively cosmopolitan leftists who despise the folks back home,
with “their simple desire for a picturesque wooden house close to a lake;
living in a society where people mostly think in the same way.” If such
yokels were to learn what was really going on, the multicultural
project might be threatened!
Soon, the names of Muslim criminals were being redacted from police and court press
releases as well. Official reports spoke only of men “of foreign background,” as if Finnish
women were being attacked by German tourists or Japanese guest lecturers from the local
university. But the authorities knew the truth: a 2018 a study by the Finnish Police
Academy found that 93% of rapes of foreigners in Finland in 2016 had been committed
by men from Islamic countries.
the spring of 2015, Juha Sipilä was elected Prime Minster of Finland on a platform of
fewer refugees. But in September of the same year, once Angela Merkel had
opened the floodgates,
he did an about face and offered refuge to 32,478 persons, mainly
young Muslim men. Sipilä
even persuaded some Finns to take such
men into their own houses, promising to do so himself
(he never did).
Within a month of their arrival in northern
Finland, 60 of these supposedly desperate asylum
seekers were staging a protest in front of
Oulu’s police station: they didn’t care for the traditional
Finnish food offered
at the local refugee center. Authorities obediently changed the menu.
The incidence of
rape and sexual assault in Northern Finland quickly increased. The first
gang rape occurred
as early as November 2015 in the town of Kempele, a few miles from
Oulu, where several ‘refugees’
had been settled; the victim was a fifteen-year-old girl.
official sources continued to suppress information about the perpetrators, a local couple
a reputation as an accurate source of information. Junes Lokka (b. 1979), a
programmer, and his fiancée Tiina Wiik (b. 1985), who blogs
under the name ‘Swan
of Tuonela,’ began livestreaming phone-ins and interviews on YouTube.
maintained contacts with ‘Alt Right’ figures worldwide: both Jared Taylor and
MacDonald, for instance, have appeared on their internet shows. In 2017, Lokka won
to the Oulu city council as an independent, with Wiik serving as vice-councilor.
In November, 2018, two local fathers set a trap for a Muslim molester operating in a city park.
“They’d called the police so that he’d effectively
be caught in, or almost in, the
act. But, amazingly, the police didn’t
seem particularly interested. Although they
arrested the diversifier, they
didn’t even bother to check the man’s phone nor
search his flat.
If anything, they appeared irritated by what the fathers had done.”
One of these fathers shared his story with Junes Lokka, who contacted the local court.
Courts in Finland, unlike the police or reporters, are legally obliged to reveal the identities
of all persons accused. Lokka found a list of seven men, besides the one caught by the
two fathers, scheduled to appear on November 28th to face charges of rape or sexual
‘Rahmani Gheibali, Yosefi Shiraqa, Mirzad Javad, Barhum Abdullhadi, Humad Osman
Mohamed, Mohamed Ali Osman… —all of them post-2015 arrivals from the Middle East.
victims had been as young as ten. The local newspaper, Kaleva, certainly knew about it,
since they receive the court records every day by email, but had colluded to hide what
happening from their readers.
Lokka realized he had stumbled
upon an organized ‘grooming gang’ of the type familiar
from Rotherham in England.
Most of the men operated at a local shopping mall, chatting
up under-age Finnish girls in English
or broken Finnish and luring them away with alcohol.
He published the list of names and charges
online, and word spread quickly. On December 4th,
an alternative newspaper reported the full
details. It became a national scandal, with
authorities rushing to deplore the crimes they
had previously attempted to keep secret.
in Oulu are appalling,” said the turncoat Prime Minister responsible for letting
into the country. The Interior Minister chimed in with promises of tougher laws
to deport foreign
criminals, but the public knew that only a few months before he had been
saying Finland could
happily take 10,000 Muslim ‘refugees’ annually, rather than the usual 1,000.
“Oulu was in shock, not so much that there were Muslim rapes — they’d had
to deal with that since at least 2005 — but that these could be systematically
organised, directed against underage girls, and covered-up by the authorities.
(See here. LD) On the night of 6th December, the 101st anniversary of Finnish
there was a torch-lit parade of nationalists through Oulu. There
had been no
such thing in previous years. They made their way to the city’s
where, watched over by police, I witnessed them give tense,
to the applause of a largely working-class audience.
the afternoon of 10th December, roughly 100 furious Finns braved the cold,
and an intimidatingly heavy police presence to protest against the cover up
and the rapes, in front of Oulu city hall. In thirteen years of
living in Finland,
I had never witnessed anything like it.
“Finns are stereotypically
trusting, cooperative, taciturn and desperate not to
offend. Yet, as councilors
walked into the town hall that dark evening, they
were greeted with screams
of ‘traitor!’ At one point, a brave Muslim construction
arose and began to defend Islam from the criticisms which some speakers
vociferously levelling against it. Hissed and jeered by the furious Finns,
was dragged from the steps and beaten up, with the police marching him
not daring to inflame the mob by arresting those who’d slapped him
until he squealed.”
later, on 26th December, the windows of Oulu’s small mosque were smashed.
Imam, Dr. Abdul Mannan, is a Social Democratic vice-councilor in town. He is
also a Wahhabi
who advocates the adoption of sharia law in Finland. In 2017 his son-in-law
was killed fighting
for ISIS in Iraq.
In early January 2019, more local grooming
cases were revealed, bringing the number of
accused to sixteen. It also came to light that a
14-year-old girl had hanged herself in October,
2018 after being raped by Muslim men. Oulu’s
police took to the newspapers to deny the story,
but a week later they were forced to admit
that the ‘refugees’ had, indirectly, claimed their first life.
“The next day, roughly 50 members of the vigilante group Soldiers of Odin
rallied at [the local shopping mall] — now heavily police-patrolled and clear of
Muslim men — and marched through the snow blanketed city. In the evening, to
quell the public mood, both the Prime Minister and the Interior Minister gave
press conferences about the situation at Oulu city hall where MSM journalists
asked them easy questions.”
The very next day, the first reports emerged of Muslim grooming activity in the capital,
Helsinki. In Oulu as well, new cases kept coming to light. On 20th February, police commissioner
Markus Kiiskanen announced that the police were investigating 29 ‘foreign’ men for child
rape and sexual assault in Oulu. Even at this stage, no one in any official position was
to clarify that the ‘foreigners’ involved were not Norwegians. The scandal became
international news, with British dissidents Katie Hopkins and Tommy
Robinson separately travelling
to Finland to meet Lokka and Wiik.
Such, in brief, are the
events that inspired the book under review, all related in its first chapter.
In the rest of
the work, Dutton uses evolutionary psychology to shed light on why the rape
and why the Finnish authorities have responded to it so weakly.
The central reason is disarmingly
simple, though its causes reach
deep into the Finns’ evolutionary history: Finns
are too nice.
Visitors to Finland strongly agree in their
characterization of the locals as quiet, unemotional,
hard-working, honest and rule-following,
stoical, and anxious to please.
They also have the highest average intelligence in Europe.
These traits characterize Northeast Asians as well, and Finns have around 10% Northeast
Asian admixture. Until as recently as the 1960s, Finns were sometimes actually classed
as ‘Mongoloids.’ This was an exaggeration, but the Finno-Ugric peoples do represent a
genetic cline in that direction.
High social anxiety
and a desire to please are associated with low self-esteem. Dutton
recounts that foreigners
like himself often get asked what they think about the Finns:
“this concern about the
opinion of others is a marker of high Agreeableness and low
self-esteem, as it is people with
these traits who are most concerned about the feelings of others.”
A Finnish sociologist named Tarja Laine has studied the national inferiority complex in detail:
“She claims Finns are often ‘discontented with the nation’
and ‘ashamed of
themselves.’ Laine argues that there is a history
of self-stigmatization in Finland,
because Finnishness was defined as ‘inferior
to the rest of Europe’ [and] also
notes how deeply concerned Finns were
about what foreigners
would think of them when they hosted the summer Olympics
Women with low self-esteem
are more anxious to please the men with
whom they interact, and thus susceptible to the attentions
Finland has historically been a poor nation.
Famine carried off 20% of the population as
recently as 1866–68, and the country remained
predominantly agricultural until the 1950s.
This means that Darwinian natural selection remained
strong until quite recently. The
harsher the environment, the more strongly men must be adapted
to it in
order to survive. For this reason, Finns have an exceptionally small gene pool.
This means fewer individual outliers, whether for intelligence or personality. The rarity
of outlier high intelligence, along with high social anxiety and conformism, explains why
Finland has produced fewer men of outstanding achievement than the country’s high
IQ would lead one to expect.
Dutton’s previous work
on the personality traits typical of genius indicate such men must have
“the ability to think unconventionally, to withstand criticism and even ridicule,
and to have the self-confidence and doggedness to pursue very hard work
many years with little or no support and sometimes in the face of outright
That kind of person tends to be bold, critical, idiosyncratic and
which is often perceived by people as annoying, arrogant,
The reader can readily
see this is very nearly the opposite of the personality type which
we have described as predominating
in Finland. High social anxiety and conformism, along
with a relative lack of personality outliers,
means very few Finns are bold enough to ‘rock
the boat’ and question things. It
may sound ironic, but it is quite possibly not an accident
that the Finn most responsible for
blowing the lid on Muslim grooming gangs is half-Moroccan.
Lutheran church is now in free-fall. As recently as 1980, 90% of Finns were
still members; today
the figure is 69%, and the decline seems to be accelerating. Dutton
reports that in his early
days in Oulu, homosexuality was seldom discussed, or it was dismissed
with the remark that
‘gays go to Helsinki.’ But by 2018, the town had its own annual gay
graced by the presence of the local Lutheran clergymen. He also shares an
anecdote about a young
female student of his who submitted an essay arguing that the
voluntary religious instruction
still offered at Finnish schools be abolished in favor of
compulsory multicultural education,
the gist of which
would be that the races are equal and there is no God.
So much for the weak Finnish response to the Muslim rape campaign against their women.
What might evolutionary psychology have to say about the behavior of the Muslims themselves?
Any man living as a Middle Eastern ‘refugee’ in Finland or any other Western
country is in
a position of extremely low social status, and thus quite unattractive to females.
basis of nationality alone, many Western women would never consider marrying even a
socioeconomically successful Middle Eastern man. In such a context, rape becomes an
option—especially gang rape, as this affords protection of a gang, lowers
the risk of
prosecution, and means the victim can be more easily overpowered.
Rape asserts dominance not just over the females themselves,
but also over the males
on the opposing side. Dutton reports:
destroys their morale and undermines their confidence, because the
assert dominance and control over the central resource for future
namely the wombs of [their] women. Rape can be a deliberate war
it creates deep trauma and insecurity among the victims and
helping to undermine their ability to defend themselves.”
Seeing themselves as jihadis waging war against Finnish infidels is a convenient way for
Muslim refugees to salve their battered self-esteem, and rape in the context of Holy War
explicitly endorsed by the Koran.
Dutton concludes that if
a large number of very low-status males from the same ethnic
group are thrust into a homogenous,
high-trust community of a different ethnicity, the
predictable result will be rape: ‘Oulu’s
Muslim Grooming Scandal was inevitable the moment
significant numbers of young, single Muslim
males were accommodated in the city.’
The near future
does not look bright. Based on the research of the late Finnish political
scientist Tatu Vanhanen,
Muslims are not going to integrate, and will come to perceive
Finns as their enemies (if they
do not already). Finns uncommitted to multiculturalism
will start to mirror this behavior,
and the country may spiral into a low-level civil war.
Meanwhile, elite Finns who cling to multicultural
thinking will vye with one another to
demonstrate how deeply they care about ‘refugees’
supposedly being victimized by their
bigoted co-ethnics. This will lead to a collapse of trust
within the ethnic majority. Many ordinary
Finns already distrust the news media and government,
and this will intensify as well.
Finnish vigilantes like
the Soldiers of Odin are already patrolling the streets. The welfare
state will become unsustainable
under such circumstances, depending as it does on a
sense of national kinship. The economy
can be expected to deteriorate and crime to
increase, even among ethnic Finns.
In the longer run, however, social trends that cannot go on forever can be relied upon
stop. As Finland becomes a more stressful and dangerous place to live, some sort of
religious revival is likely, which will both raise the native birthrate and steel
resolve for the struggle. Nationalist parties will grow. As Dutton notes:
“Computer models have demonstrated that once 25% of a group adhere to a
counter-cultural viewpoint, such as ethnocentrism currently is, and become
activists fervently advocating it, they tip the opinion of the entire group towards
their own. And all else controlled for, the more ethnocentric group will always
triumph. As discussed, Finns are high in conformism, so when the country
‘flips’ from multiculturalism back to nationalism, it will happen very quickly.”
Observers appalled at the apparent weakness of the Finns’ initial response to Muslim
rape gangs will do well to recall the ferocity this nation has historically demonstrated in
defending itself, and bear in mind the poet’s warning: Beware the fury of a patient
LD: According to the recently released World Happiness Report
by the UN,
Finland was nominated the “happiest place on earth”
in 2019 for the second year in a row. When
quizzed by reporters, most Finns
disagreed with this finding and said they
had little to feel happy about, given the
rape epidemic and the deadly virus
of mass immigration created by the People Destroyers.
Watch this video and
decided for yourself: Who is to blame for throwing open
box of evils?
Jewish Involvement in Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations
“The Tree of Life Synagogue
victims died so that refugees could live.”
Rob Eshman, Jewish Journal
advantage through our dead. We make our dead your problem. The meaning we find in
our deceased we find as a courtesy to you, to help you,
to change your societies for the “better.””
David Cole, Takimag
Refugee and asylum legislation is
now a key policy area for many major immigrant-receiving countries. The UN Refugee
Agency estimates there are currently 28.5 million refugees and asylum seekers worldwide,
with most originating in South
Afghanistan, and Syria. The world’s largest refugee hosting countries are located near the epicenters of those
countries experiencing difficulties, and include Turkey
(3.5 million), Uganda (1.4 million), Pakistan (1.4 million), Lebanon
(1 million), and the Islamic Republic of Iran (979,400). More incongruous, however, is the
fact refugee and asylum populations
from these same troubled areas have exploded in the West, in countries both geographically and culturally very distant
from exporting nations. Since 1990, the new refugee population
of Austria has climbed from 34,948 to 115,197; in Belgium
from 25,911 to 42,128; in Finland from 2,348 to 20,713; in France from 193,000 to 337,143; in Germany from
970,302; in Ireland from
360 to 6,324; in Italy from 10,840 to 167,260; in Luxembourg from 687 to 1,995; in the Netherlands
from 17,337 to 103,818; in Norway from 19,581 to 59,160; in Sweden
from 109,663 to 240,889; in Switzerland from
40,943 to 92,995; and in the United Kingdom from 43,632 to 121,766. Increased lobbying on behalf of refugees, and
increased quotas for refugee admissions, are now a very
significant part of the West’s overall approach to migration.
The only significant current exceptions to these trends are Hungary, where the number of
new refugees has dropped from
to 5,641, and the United States and Canada, both of which were home in 2017 to roughly half the number of new
refugees they hosted in 1990.
In the United States, the lower figures can be attributed
to clauses within the Refugee Act of 1980, which both defined
a refugee and gave the President (in consultation with Congress) the power to determine the number of
accepted to the United States
each year. That figure currently stands at 45,000. The history of the Refugee Act can be
traced to the 1975 State Department, where Lionel Rosenblatt, a Jewish diplomat and future
President of Refugees
was working on persuading Ted Kennedy to back legislation providing a visa program for refugees from
Indochina in the wake of the Vietnam War and mass executions
in Cambodia. Stephen Young, then a recently qualified D.C.
lawyer who worked with Rosenblatt, recalled that “In 1975, no one had any claim to enter the U.S. as a refugee,” though,
since the introduction of the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act, certain foreign
aliens could be “paroled” into the country at the
discretion of the Attorney General. In 1975 alone, Rosenblatt helped relocate approximately
140,000 Indochinese to the United States by working within
the existing structure.
As the number of claims under McCarran-Walter
increased, decision-making power was increasingly dispersed to the
Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and International Law, then chaired
(1967–1979) by Jewish Democrat
Eilberg. As figures like Rosenblatt and Eilberg began agitating for a more fluid yet formal legislative approach to the
refugee question, Young recalls one conversation where
Kennedy informed Rosenblatt he would only be willing to back
legislation that would accept a maximum of 150,000 Indochinese refugees. Kennedy was presumably only too
both Congress and the
American public were opposed to the acceptance of significant numbers of Indochinese migrants.
In the final event, however, the Refugee Act, drafted by Jewish
Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman and given a public
face by Ted Kennedy — the same Ted Kennedy who gave a public face to the 1965 immigration act
— provided visas for more than 1.7 million Indochinese
in the period between 1980 and 1989.
In July 2018, Holtzman penned a scathing letter of resignation from her then role at the Department of Homeland Security,
expressing disgust with the immigration, refugee, and asylum policies of Donald Trump, and
claiming, quite contrary to all
evidence, that the United States in 1980 had “welcomed refugees” and had “readily accepted and absorbed”
In reality, in those areas where
they settled, Indochinese refugees were a significant drain on welfare and other forms of public
assistance, barely assimilated, and “overloaded the public
schools and medical facilities
were blamed for a rise in the rate of tuberculosis and other diseases.”
The conspicuous presence of influential Jewish diplomats and politicians in the formulation
of the Refugee Act of 1980,
with the obvious dissonance between Elizabeth Holtzman’s presentation of the Act and the reality of it’s impact,
should be contextualized within the
question of ethnic conflict in immigration policy more generally. In particular, it should
be contextualized within Kevin MacDonald’s discussion of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration policy, in the
course of which MacDonald concludes that “Jewish organizations have uniformly advocated
high levels of immigration
racial and ethnic groups into Western societies and have also advocated a multicultural model for these societies.”
The posited reasons for this uniformity
include the historical Jewish interest in securing immigration rights for Jews, and
the fact that pluralism is conducive to increased feelings of Jewish security — a
state of affairs in which Jews become
just one among many ethnic groups instead of a sole outgroup in a predominantly White, Christian nation. The theory
allows for exceptions to the rule, in cases where Jewish
interests are interpreted differently by a minority of Jews. Further,
Jewish success in advancing pluralistic goals are said to be rooted in a number of Jewish
traits, especially high verbal
and a tendency toward in-group networking. This theoretical framework would seem to predict that Jews
would be overrepresented in positions of influence within
contemporary refugee, asylum, and similar pro-immigration or
“immigrants rights” organizations. The following study of a number of such organizations strongly
all aspects of MacDonald’s
theoretical framework, and offers a rejoinder to some recent criticisms of it.
Perhaps the most high-profile recent criticism of MacDonald’s
theory of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration
policy is that of Nathan Cofnas, a graduate student in the philosophy of biology at the University of
Oxford. Cofnas offers
theory in the form of his “default hypothesis.” In his own summary of the default hypothesis, Cofnas
states: “Because of their above average intelligence
and concentration in influential urban areas, Jews will be
overrepresented in all intellectual movements and activities that are not overtly anti-Semitic.”
As such, while Jews may be
in pro-immigration, pro-pluralism organizations and movements, the default hypothesis insists that they
will also be overrepresented in anti-immigration or
restrictionist movements (that are not anti-Semitic) also.
There is an inherent implication that these overrepresentati
ons will be, more or less, to the same degree.
moving to a discussion of findings in relation to Jewish involvement in contemporary refugee and migrant
organizations, it is first necessary to test the default
hypothesis by examining the scale and nature of Jewish involvement
in contemporary anti-immigration organizations that are not anti-Semitic. To date, the only
evidence offered by Cofnas
to such a test is the list of scheduled speakers at a single 1994 American Renaissance conference (where
four of the ten speakers were Jewish). While an interesting, if perfectly explicable, statistic, when compared with
the extensive discussion of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration policy before
1965, and the broader
context of widespread and intensive Jewish activism on behalf of pro-pluralist, pro-immigration causes,
Cofnas’s riposte can only be described, kindly,
as entirely inadequate. For the purposes of this study, the senior
staff directories of the three most prominent anti-immigration think tanks currently in
operation in United States were
The three main anti-immigration organizations are the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), NumbersUSA,
and Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).
In the following the thumbnail sketches of these organizations
was provided by a long-time activist against immigration with insider’s insight; figures for Jewish
representation are mine.
FAIR: FAIR has been described
by former board members as “Dan Stein’s 401(k) plan.” It scarfs up most of the
immigration patriot money available, especially from timid Establishment
foundations, does essentially nothing
spends a lot of its time undercutting and blocking potential rivals. Stein has been running FAIR since 1988, i.e.
has presided over a period of continuous defeats for
the immigration patriot movement. Activists seriously debate
whether he is a mole.
At FAIR, four of 52 senior staff
members are Jewish, including President Dan Stein, Media Director Ira Mehlman, and Board
members Sarah G. Epstein and Paul Nachman. This is a Jewish representation
of approximately 7.7%. Across all three
major anti-immigration organizations, Jews occupy 5.13% of senior roles. This is in fact a generous figure to settle on
as an approximate broader working figure, because Jews
were totally absent from the senior levels of every smaller
CIS: The CIS does a lot of worthy studies, but is determinedly PC, presumably
to maintain viability in the MSM/ Beltway,
which limits its ability to appeal to a wider audience. The $PLC named it a Hate Group anyway a couple of years ago
(as was FAIR, for no apparent reason), after which its
main spokesman, Mark Krikorian, has been a little more daring,
especially on twitter. Senior positions at CIS are listed in Center Staff, Board of Directors, and Center
Of these individuals, two are Jewish: Chief Litigation Counsel Julie Axelrod and Senior Policy Analyst
Stephen Steinlight, although Mark Krikorian is their
main public spokesperson. This is a Jewish representation of 5.41%.
NumbersUSA is a worthy organization, and its Congressional Grade card system excellent. However,
its founder ,Roy Beck, is apparently planning to retire, so the
future is uncertain. There are no Jewish members of staff
listed at NumbersUSA. But we will assume that Jews have an average representation in the anti-immigrant politics of around 5%.
Given that the Jewish proportion of the population of the United States is assumed to be
around 2.2-2.5%, the six individual
Jews at CIS and FAIR do technically amount to an overrepresentation at the top level, albeit rather modest in light of the
representation of Jews active in legal and associated
professions more generally, not to mention Cofnas’s flamboyant
panegyric to Jewish intellectual and organizational talent. Taking into account an allowance
for any such Jewish representation
anti-immigration politics on the grounds of alternative perceptions of specifically Jewish interests, discussed in the MacDonald
thesis, a search was conducted on commentary on immigration
given by these figures, or other
indications as to their ideological leanings that may be evident in their broader work.
within MacDonald’s theoretical framework, in which concerns about anti-Semitism will be primary among Jews
of all political hues, a reasonable prediction would
be that Jewish representation in anti-immigration movements would
be both exceptional in the larger picture of the immigration debate, and, rather than being
concerned about traditional
as a whole, will be focussed almost exclusively on the exclusion of those immigrants or refugees perceived to
be anti-Semitic, especially Muslims from the Middle East.
In other words, such representations will be based on what might
be termed renegade, minority, or abnormal perceptions of Jewish interests, rather than
shared concerns or earnest sympathies
with the greater mass of the native population.
In this regard, Ira Mehlman and Stephen Steinlight are especially interesting figures. In a 2012 interview
with Peter Beinart,
Mehlman is unambiguous
in telling his interviewer: “current mass immigration policies are harming the interests of
American Jews … Mass immigration is introducing large numbers
of new people to American society who hold far less
favorable opinions of Jews.” Similarly, in 2001 Steinlight penned an essay for the Center for Immigration Studies bluntly
titled “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.” In the course of the essay, Steinlight condemns
periods of nativism and restrictionism
in the United States, and strongly promotes pluralistic and multicultural ideals.
In fact, Steinlight’s only apparent grievance with existing immigration structures
is that they have resulted in the fact
at some point in the
next 20 years Muslims will outnumber Jews, and that Muslims with an “Islamic agenda” are
growing active politically through a widespread network
of national organizations. This is occurring at a time when
the religion of Islam is being supplanted in many of the Islamic immigrant sending countries by the
totalitarian ideology of Islamism of which vehement
anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism form central tenets.
sentiments are essentially neoconservative, itself of course a largely Jewish ideological movement in conflict with
native interests, and are entirely predictable within
the basic theoretical framework offered by MacDonald, while doing
little or nothing to corroborate the default hypothesis offered by Cofnas. Steinlight and
Mehlman are primarily concerned
potential increases in anti-Semitism and a decline in Jewish political clout, and not with
any broader implications of pluralism, multiculturalism, or White
Similar issues emerge when one considers another issue
raised by Cofnas, putatively in support of his default hypothesis.
This is the presence of Jewish academics active in what might be termed “race realism,”
or genetic determinism, and
apparent fact that Jews have been strongly overrepresented among high-profile advocates of hereditarianism.
Cofnas writes that “two out of seven of the most
prominent hereditarians were Jewish (Hans Eysenck and Richard
Herrnstein), making Jews extremely overrepresented in this group relative to their numbers in the general
Eysenck was half-Jewish,
and Herrnstein married outside his group. Neither appear to have lived in any kind of sustained
Jewish milieu, and Eysenck made a point of explicitly denying any
affinity or connection to Jewishness. It is interesting
does not place his contention in any kind of context, or seek to prove his theory of rough parity in
overrepresentations, by offering comparisons with overrepresentations
among anti-hereditarian scholars.
Another issue, of course, is the
obvious problem of extrapolating broader issues of politics and identity from an academic’s
career. An excellent case in this regard, from the Arts, is the
Jewish literary critic and Yale scholar Harold Bloom,
who combines an obvious love and respect for the Western canon with a clear loathing for cultural marxist
in literary academia. Working within the Cofnas approach, Bloom would likely be held up as an example of the
default hypothesis at work. And yet Bloom is otherwise
a committed pluralist who viewed the Bush administration as
verging on a theocratic fascist regime, and sees the Trump administration as a catastrophe. Bloom writes: “Trump won
because 62 million Americans live in a state of virtual reality. They no longer know what facts are. They’re
also consumed by resentment, racial prejudice, and the
deep fear that their America is vanishing forever. It will.”
[Emphasis added] Another example, from the sciences, is the geneticist David Reich who has
done much to advance an
of genetic differences between the races, yet has also repeatedly insisted that race is largely a “social construct.”
The point here is that MacDonald’s thesis does not require every Jewish academic
to cynically use his or her discipline
to advance Jewish interests, but that it does advance the idea that Jews will overwhelmingly see support for pluralism
and mass immigration as being in their interests. As
such, not every Jewish scientist studying race differences
will necessarily oppose multiculturalism, racial pluralism, or mass immigration, and in fact very few will.
While these points may highlight some of the more obvious problems with the default hypothesis
offered by Cofnas, a
test is proposed by examining the scale of Jewish representation in contemporary refugee and migrant organizations.
Jewish Representation in Secular Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations.
In contrast to the modest overrepresentation of Jews in anti-immigration groups (around
5%), Jews are nothing short of
in influential senior roles in contemporary refugee, asylum, and pro-migration organizations. Significantly, Jews
occupy the leadership of all four of the largest and
most influential (and nominally secular) organizations active in America
today, the International Rescue Committee (President and CEO David Miliband), Refugees International
(President Eric P. Schwartz,
of HIAS), International Refugee Assistance Project (Director Becca Heller), and Human Rights Watch
(Executive Director Kenneth Roth, and Deputy Directors Iain Levine
and Fred Abrahams).
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) is one of the
most significant organizations bringing migrants to the United States.
In their countries of origin, refugees and their families are assisted by the IRC to prepare
their cases to the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), compiling personal data and background information for security clearance. Once their cases are
approved, refugees are usually greeted at the airport
by case workers from the IRC. The IRC then provides these migrants
with a home, furnishings, food, and any other assistance that might be required. The IRC
operates 27 offices across the United
States, each offering food, housing, educational, and medical assistance. It also works closely with the U.S. Office of
Resettlement (ORR) Division
of Refugee Assistance, which was reported in August 2018 as quietly removing its staff directory
with the Internet Wayback Machine revealed the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement to be one
Carl Rubenstein, an alumnus of Tel Aviv Law School. In 2017, the IRC, in conjunction with Rubenstein’s ORR, resettled
more than 51,000 migrants to the United States, and is
currently a staunch
current restrictions imposed by President Trump.
(Clockwise) Eric P. Schwartz, David Miliband, Iain Levine, Becca Heller, Kenneth Roth, Fred Abrahams)
Jews are very prominent in the leadership of the IRC. In addition to President and CEO David Miliband,
there are at least
30 Jews in senior
positions within the organization including Morton I. Abramowitz (Overseer), Madeleine Albright (Overseer),
Laurent Alpert (Board Member), Clifford Asness (Board
Member), Betsy Blumenthal (Overseer), Alan Batkin (Chairman
Emeritus and Board Member), Michael W. Blumenthal (Overseer), Susan Dentzer (Board Member), Evan G. Greenberg
(Overseer), Morton I. Hamburg (Overseer), Leila Heckman
(Overseer), Karen Hein (Overseer), Marvin Josephson (Overseer),
Alton Kastner (Overseer and former Deputy Director), Henry Kissinger (Overseer), David A. Levine (Board
Reynold Levy (Overseer),
Robert E. Marks (Overseer), Sara Moss (Overseer), Thomas Nides (Board Member),
Susan Petricof (Overseer), Gideon Rose (Overseer), Thomas Schick (Chairman Emeritus and
Board Member), James Strickler
Sally Susman (Board Member), Mona Sutphen (Board Member), Merryl Tisch (Board Member), Maureen White
(Board Member), Jonathan Wiesner (Chairman Emeritus
and Board Member), William Winters (Overseer), and
James D. Wolfensohn (Overseer).
The Board of the IRC is comprised
of 30 individuals, 12 of whom are Jewish, giving a Jewish representation at senior
board level of 40%. The Board of Overseers consists of 78 individuals, of whom at least 25
are Jewish, giving a Jewish
at this level of just over 32%. Since Jews occupy the position of CEO at the IRC, as well as 40% of the
senior board and 32% of the lower board, it would be
reasonable to assert that they enjoy a dominant
within the organization. This dwarfs any Jewish representation seen in anti-immigration groups.
International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) came to national prominence when Director Becca Heller brought
a class action suit against Trump’s January 2017
travel ban on individuals from certain Muslim countries. Heller, who
has described herself as an “intensely neurotic Jew,” was active from the very earliest airport detentions, and was assisted
by former Yale law professor Michael Wishnie, also Jewish
and a former member of Jews for Economic and Social Justice.
Wishnie assembled “a group of students to draft a class action suit to represent not just IRAP’s two clients but anyonewho
had been detained.” The case
was later also supported and taken up by the Immigrant’s Rights division of the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) at the direction of its two Deputy Directors,
Lee Gelernt and Judy Rabinowitz, both of whom
are Jewish. At IRAP,
there are three Jews on the board of the International Refugee Assistance Project: Jon Finer, David
Nierenberg, and Carl Reisner. The board consists of 12 members, giving
a Jewish representation of 25%. Aside from
the board, other influential positions in the organization are held by Jews, including Deputy Legal Director (Lara Finkbeiner),
and legal fellow (Julie Kornfeld).
Again, this is significantly greater than any Jewish representation seen in anti-immigration groups.
Lee Gelernt & Judy Rabinowitz
Heller’s cause has very recently
been taken up by what the New York Times has euphemistically been called “Big Law”
but what is in fact a large number of Jewish legal conglomerates
based in New York. Of these, the most significant is
Paul Weiss in Manhattan, led by Brad S. Karp, a Director of the American Friends of The Hebrew University and
prize-winner from the Jewish Theological Seminary. Karp, whose previous political adventures
have included activism for homosexual marriage,
has offered his company’s
services pro bono, via counsels Emily Goldberg and Steven C. Herzog, to Gelernt and Rabinowitz
to obstruct Trump’s anti-immigration measures, with Gelernt telling the New York Times that Karp’s help
Refugee organizations are also reliant to a
great extent on legal assistance provided by “immigrant’s rights” organizations.
Here too, Jews appear to be overrepresented by a large margin. For
example, Jews comprise just over 14% of overall
listed staff at the National Immigrant Justice Center, and dominate the most senior positions. These include Director of
Policy (Heidi Altman, former legal director for the Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights
Coalition), Associate Director of Legal
Services (Ashley Huebner), Director of Litigation (Charles Roth), and Associate Director of Litigation (Keren Zwick).
Maria Blumenfeld, a former senior lawyer for NIJC departed
the group for another, almost identical organization,
named Equal Justice Works, the Director of which is David Stern, also Jewish. Another interesting organization is
The Immigrant Defense Project. Of the 15 listed senior staff, at least four are verifiably Jewish (Development Director
Ariadna Rodenstein, Senior Staff Attorney Genia Blaser, Supervising
Attorney Marie Mark, and Supervising Attorney Andrew
Wachtenheim). This is a Jewish representation at senior level of over 26% – significantly greater
than any Jewish representation
in anti-immigration groups. Of the five members of the Immigrant Defense Project’s Advisory Board, one, Peter Markowitz,
is Jewish. Markowitz is also listed as founder and director
of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic and a
“George Soros Justice Fellow and staff attorney at the Bronx Defenders from 2002 to 2005,”
where he “developed the
first in-house full-service immigration project housed in a public defender office.”
New Hampshire’s “Best Immigration Lawyer” is the Jewish Ron Abramson.
At the National Immigration Law Center, 18.5% of its staff lawyers are verifiably Jewish, and the
Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project is under Jewish Presidency (Ty Frankel) and 26% of its
board is Jewish (Frankel, Ira Feldman, David Androff, Nathan Fidel, and Andrew Silverman). The Immigrant Legal Resource Center
was founded mostly via the efforts
of Jewish lawyer Mark Silverman, described here as “one of the very first movement
lawyers helping DREAMers.” Its board is under Jewish chairmanship (Lisa Spiegel), and its Executive Director is
Eric Cohen, also Jewish. One interesting member of its senior staff is Rose Cahn, also Jewish, who is a former Senior
Soros Justice Fellow at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. Cahn specializes
in what she calls “post-conviction relief for immigrants,”
which is rather florid way of saying that she specializes in helping
foreign criminals get into, and remain in, the United States. Other senior staff members
include Donna Goolub and Sara
a Jewish woman who nevertheless managed to become Migration Policy Advisor to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops,
a fact that sheds some light on
how that organization became rabidly pro-migrant.
Another organization providing legal support for the pro-immigration
lobby is the Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Right’s Under the Law.
Of its six most senior staff, three
are Jewish (Jon M. Greenbaum, Lisa Bornstein, and Samuel Weiss). One of its
most senior lawyers
is Ezra Rosenberg, a veteran in the multicultural cause who has worked variously to challenge
racial profiling by police, to stop requests for voter ID among certain ethnic groups in
Texas, and to advance school
in North Carolina. A further interesting organization is the Northwest Immigrants Rights Project, where
two members of the board
of 12 can be verified as Jewish (Dave Heiner and Sara Litt), a representation of 16%,
and staff attorneys include Jews Elizabeth Eisenberg, Jenna Golan-Streib, Rachel Rubinstein,
and Jordan Wasserman.
At the Asylum Advocacy Project, two of the five members of the advisory board are Jewish (Dani Isaacsohn
and the above mentioned Michael Wishnie), and its list of donors appears to be at least 40% Jewish.
The Director of Refugee Council USA
is Naomi Steinberg. The Executive Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union
is the Jewish feminist Donna Lieberman who includes among her ongoing activities “resisting the Trump regime’s attack
on immigrant children and refugees,” while its Legal Director
is Arthur Eisenberg. The American Immigration Council is
under the Jewish Directorship
of Beth Werlin, its Research Director is the Argentinian Jew Guillermo Cantor (see a great
example of his propaganda
here), and its Policy and Media Director is Royce Bernstein Murray. The area director for
Services of Texas in Austin is the Jewish Erica Schmidt-Portnoy. Schmidt-Portnoy has described the recent 80%
decline in the number of refugees being resettled in Texas
as “hard to watch.” Meanwhile, another Portnoy, Diane Portnoy,
Jewish founder and CEO of The Immigrant Learning Center, has demanded that Massachusetts should welcome more Syrian refugees.
A similar organization is the Open Avenues Foundation, which has the stated goal of “helping foreign nationals build
their unique path to thrive in the United States.” The founder and executive director
of Open Avenues is Danielle Goldman, also Jewish.
Jewish lawyers, occasionally acting alone or as part
of small firms, are also disproportionately represented as major
immigrant and asylum advocates. One good example in this regard is Susan J. Cohen, founder and Chair of Mintz
Immigration Practice. Cohen was involved in contributing to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
regulations implementing the Immigration Act of 1990,
and has won awards for her political asylum work from the
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and the Political Asylum/Immigration Representation (PAIR) Project
she is now President).
PAIR “provides free immigration services to indigent asylum seekers and detained immigrants.”
In 2017, Cohen led a Mintz team that worked with the
ACLU of Massachusetts and
to obtain a temporary restraining order on President Trump’s travel ban.
also advised the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in drafting the legislation which resulted in the Massachusetts
Global Entrepreneur in Residence (GEIR) program, which
enables tens of thousands of non-White foreign students to
stay in Massachusetts if they merely indicate they might start a company. Cohen co-developed the project
Jewish lawyer, Jeff Goldman. Goldman describes himself as “a leader in immigration policy” and “chairs Governor Charlie
Baker’s Advisory Council on Refugees and Immigrants.”
Goldman and Cohen, like Carl Rubenstein at the Office of Refugee
Resettlement, are illustrative of a remarkable Jewish talent for acquiring key government
positions in the areas of
and refugee resettlement. Another useful example is Mark Greenberg, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy
and a former senior administrator at Rubenstein’s Office of Refugee Resettlement. Yet another very notable
Jewish lawyer is Michael Kagan. Kagan led a campaign to ensure changes to refugee status determination (RSD) procedures
by the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) that would result in more migrants
attaining official refugee status, thus improving their
chances of getting asylum or visas in the West. Kagan is co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the
University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ Boyd School of
Law, which offers free legal aid to all immigrants.
The record of Jews as immigration
judges is also quite remarkable. Detailed statistics for most senior immigration judges
are available online. One example is Judge Raisa Cohen, New York Immigration Court. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch
appointed Cohen to begin hearing cases at the court in March 2016, but Cohen had previously
decided on asylum cases as
chief counsel for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in New York.
During the period 2013-2018, Cohen is recorded as deciding
572. Of these, he granted 470 and denied 102. Converted to
percentage terms, Cohen denied 17.8 percent and granted 82.2 percent. Compared to Cohen’s denial
rate of 17.8 percent,
during this same period, immigration court judges denied 57.6 percent of asylum claims. Many asylum seekers in
New York are provided with free legal aid by organizations
like Central American Legal Assistance(CALA). CALA has a
board of ten
people, five of whom can be confirmed as Jewish (Lisa Reiner, Anne Isaak, Zachary Sanders, Harry Shulman, and Ellen Wachtel).
Another example, Judge Leonard Shapiro of Boston, is equally illustrative. Shapiro was appointed as an Immigration Judge
in December 1990, and was coauthor of the 1988 Edition of The American Immigration Lawyers
Association Textbook and
1995 Edition of The Immigration Judge Benchbook. Shapiro was also the chairman of the Immigration Law Section
of the Massachusetts Bar Association in 1990 prior to
his appointment. During the period 2013-2018, Shapiro is recorded
as deciding 160 asylum claims. Of these, he granted 113 and denied 47. Converted to percentage
terms, Shapiro denied
and granted 70.6 percent. Again, nationally during this same period,
immigration court judges denied 57.6 percent of asylum claims.
Jews feature prominently among the
top immigration lawyers in Canada. In Nova Scotia, Lee Cohen “has become a
in immigration and human rights law” since “his representation of 174 Sikhs who landed in Shelburne in
the summer of 1987.” Cohen now recalls: “Nobody
was for immigration,” he says. “Nobody wanted refugees. I felt I
was one of the very few people struggling to open the eyes of our community to something
that needed to be talked
We had the opportunity to bring people to Canada — people who would help build our prosperity and our nation,
but who also needed to be here. So I dedicated myself
to refugee and immigration law.” Cohen went on to found the
Halifax Refugee Clinic, and has “served as a mentor to a new generation of immigration
law professionals, who are
him push for changes in the system.” Halifax Magazine has described Cohen as “the face of immigration law in Nova Scotia.”
Montreal’s most prominent immigration lawyer is David Cohen. Cohen is the founder of CanadaVisa.com, and sits
on the Leaders’ Roundtable on Immigration of the Conference Board of Canada. He has appeared before
of Canadian Government Parliamentary
Committees on immigration issues, where he “has been actively working with
government authorities to educate stakeholders about the finer points of the Immigration
and Refugee Protection Act
This took the form of vocal opposition to the Conservative government’s proposed legislative changes, which
would restrict migration. Meanwhile, one of Toronto’s “Premiere” immigration
lawyers is the Jewish Shelley Levine,
who has represented thousands
of refugees and asylum seekers in Canada’s immigration courts, and regularly prepares
appeals to the Refugee Appeal Division and attends before the Federal
Court Trial Division where he argues Judicial Review
cases of negative immigration decisions.
The Canadian Bar Association (CBA)
introduced its Immigration Law Section Award of Excellence in 2009, and has
since given the award seven times. Of these, Jews have been recipients three times (2009
– David Matas, senior legal
counsel of B’nai Brith Canada; 2011 – Gary Segal; and 2015 – Lorne Waldman). Waldman, who often waxes
about his Jewish background,
has been described by Canadian Lawyer as among the 25 most influential lawyers in Canada,
and as the most influential refugee and immigration lawyer in the country. In 2013, the
award was given to the founders of
the Immigration Law Section of the CBA – Mendel Green, Cecil Rotenberg, Barbara Jackman, Marshall Drukarsh,
Charles Roach, Gary Segal, Carter Hoppe, Steve Abrahams,
and Donald Greenbaum. Clearly most, if not all, of these
individuals are Jews. Jewish lawyers are also very well represented on the Immigration and Refugee Board
, including Edward E. Aronoff, Gregory Cohen, Jeffrey Kushner, Shereen Benzvy Miller – Deputy Chair of
Jonathan Rozenstein, Jaclyn Wasserman, Claire Wittenberg, and Marie-Claude Yaacov.
Two of Canada’s most high-profile academic propagandists on
behalf of increased immigration are Hugh Segal, an
alumnus of United Talmud Torah
Academy, and Maureen Silcoff. Segal is a Distinguished Fellow at the Munk School
of Global Affairs, University of Toronto and Principal of Massey College. He also served in the Canadian
Senate as a
Conservative from Ontario,
which shows, if nothing else, that the term Conservative is now all but meaningless. Silcoff
is an immigration and refugee lawyer, a former member of the Immigration
and Refugee Board, and co-chair of the
Association of Refugee Lawyers litigation committee . In July 2018, Segal and Silcoff, along with an East
Asian named Chen, teamed up to write a piece for the National Post titled: “Canada’s future
depends on opening — not closing — our borders: We need higher immigration levels.”
Since Jews are estimated to be 1.2% of the Canadian population, we are again seeing not
overrepresentations of Jews in the areas of immigration, refugee assistance, the promotion of multiculturalism.
In the UK, Jews have also been remarkably
overrepresented in the development of pro-immigration policy. In 2000, Tom Steinberg,
a British Jew who doesn’t
appear to have expertise in anything but has been extraordinarily successful in gaining
influence with British and American governments, penned a policy
document for the Institute of
Affairs titled “Reforming British Migration Policy.” Among his arguments is the following:
The second advantageous
aspect of allowing economic migrants into the UK is the cultural assets they bring
with them, whether they be cuisine, music, science, literature, forms of social
organisation or actual objects and
Britain has benefited an incalculable amount from imported practices, from chicken tikka masala to
democracy itself. The dangers presented by nations which
legislate to enforce cultural purity hardly need
repeating. Britain is not about to go down such a path, but the lack of open migration channels means an
inevitable retardation of cultural assimilation, with
potential social and economic costs. The missed opportunities
themselves are impossible to calculate, but we need only to note that the founder of Intel was a Hungarian
born migrant to the US, or that Picasso
received inspiration from African masks, to see the varying and potentially
enormous opportunity costs that hindering cultural interaction could have. Had we had such
strict migration policies
past as we do today we can be sure that Britain would be a less rich place than it is. Our primary religion,
much of our language, our beer and favourite foods
all have strong foreign elements
could have been excluded by our current migration policies. [emphasis added]
the document are multiple references to speeches by Barbara Roche, Britain’s Minister of State for
and Immigration, 1999-2001. Roche is also Jewish. In February 2016, a biography of Tony Blair, Broken
Vows: Tony Blair — The Tragedy of Power
(serialized in the Daily Mail), described Roche’s part in the deliberate
encouragement of mass immigration into the UK during Blair’s
time as Prime Minister. The Daily Mail, in its serialization,
commented: “The most incredible revelations concern Barbara Roche, a little-known MP
who was immigration minister
1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies that changed the face of the UK … She changed
the rules to allow more work permits to be issued, especially
to people who would previously have been considered asylum
seekers.” Stephen Boys Smith, who was then head of the Home Office’s immigration directorate,
added: “It was clear that
wanted more immigrants to come to Britain. She didn’t see her job as controlling entry into Britain, but by
looking at the wider picture in a “holistic way”
she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.”
Tom Steinberg and Barbara Roche
One of Britain’s foremost pro-migrant
activists prior to the Roche years was Steve Cohen, a Jewish human-rights
Manchester. Cohen founded the Immigration Aid Unit, and was “politically opposed to immigration controls
in their totality and took part in many anti-deportation
and immigration campaigns both as a lawyer and a campaigner.”
He founded the ‘No One is Illegal’ Group in September 2003, and penned a number
of tracts with titles such as Imagine
There’s No Countries and From the Jews to the Tamils: Britain’s mistreatment of refugees. Cohen
described himself as
but his “open borders” ideological is mirrored well by Bryan Caplan, a Jewish American capitalist economist
described by both The Atlantic and Vox as one of the world’s leading proponents of the open borders position. One
of Caplan’s tracts is titled Why Should We Restrict Immigration?, something
that could easily have emerged from the
Cohen canon. Apparently differing widely in their economics, their shared ethnic origins emerge as the only significant
connection. The UK’s Refugee Law Initiative, based at the University of London, was founded and is led by a Jew,
Director David Cantor. Cantor previously worked at the Refugee Legal Centre, a London-based public law centre that provide
s free legal advice and representation to asylum seekers.
None of the above takes into account
the equally prolific presence of Jews in what might be termed the “propagandistic”
elements of the unfolding era of mass migration, or areas of activism
in which Jews act explicitly as Jews (e.g. HIAS).
These subject will require separate treatment and will form a later addition to what will undoubtedly become
series exploring the
startling similarities in pro-migrant, pro-refugee Jewish activism. The intention of this essay is merely
to act as an introduction to the themes, and to some
of the individuals and groups involved, and to act as a corrective to
the Cofnas default hypothesis, which ends all too abruptly and neatly with the assertion
that Jews are simply prone to
We may reply, having surveyed the scene, that there are overrepresentations and then there are
overrepresentations. There really is no comparison between
Jewish involvement in anti-immigration politics, and Jewish
involvement in pro-immigration politics. In fact, the only place on earth where one might find ample
evidence of the former is Israel – a fact that
damns the Cofnas hypothesis rather than supporting it.
To paraphrase Hamlet, we might say,
when looking upon Israel, “Ay, there’s the rub!” Because if the Jewish interest in
immigration and refugees is provoked, as we are so often
told, by the Jewish historical experience, then it would appear
that Jews are only willing to indulge this warped self-pitying nostalgia in lands other
than their own. If the pro-refugee,
craze is a Diaspora phenomenon, then the lands of the Diaspora have a problem. The practical realities
of this problem are such that anti-immigration politics
lacking anti-Semitic elements are doomed to failure. Jews are
demonstrably providing the leadership, organisational capacity, money, and legal aggression that is driving
migration machine. This
isn’t a conspiracy theory. The names and groups here can be checked and rechecked –
they aren’t going to disappear, and the percentages won’t
It’s time to wake up. (Past time actually).
Detroit: The Death of White Civilisation
Anyone who doubts the long-term
effect of the swamping of the First World by the Third, need look no
further than Detroit, where a new report has revealed that almost half of all adults in
the city are “functionally illiterate” and essentially unable to operate in normal society.
The report, issued
by the “Detroit Regional Workforce Fund” (a government-private sector partnership organisation
set up by race-blind liberals), said that the “National Institute for Literacy estimates that 47% of adults
in Detroit are
functionally illiterate, referring to the inability of an individual
to use reading,
speaking, writing, and computational skills in everyday life
those adults who score at Level 1 (on a scale of 1 to 5, lowest to highest) have difficulty performing such
everyday tasks as locating an intersection on a street map, reading and comprehending
a short newspaper article, or calculating total costs on an order form,” it continued.
The report admitted
that the shocking illiteracy levels could not be explained solely by a lack of high school education.
“We also know that of the 200,000
adults who are functionally illiterate, approximately half have a high school diploma
or GED, so this issue cannot be solely addressed by a focus on adult high-school completion,” the baffled
In addition, the report said, these figures are “aggregates and communicate a city-wide issue. We also know
neighborhoods and census tracts within the city have more significant concentrations
of adults who are functionally
illiterate and/or lack educational credentials.”
The report ignores
the obvious: Detroit is now a “black” city, and has been utterly destroyed after the whites were
driven out by a combination of horrendous black crime levels, collapsing standards and an
In a nutshell, whites have found it impossible to live
in an area where there
is no longer any semblance of functioning modern white
violent crime rate is one of the highest in the United States. The official crime rate is 62.18 per 1000 residents
for property crimes, and 16.73 per 1000 for violent crimes (compared to national figures
of 32 per 1000 for property
crimes and 5 per 1000 for violent crime). Official
records also show that up to 70 percent of homicides are drug related.
* Black crime has run every last major grocery store out of Detroit.
Massive shoplifting, stock theft and inoperable
Third World conditions saw the
last major store, Farmer Jack, leave in 2007. Since then, Detroit,
one of America’s
largest cities, hasn’t had a single grocery chain store within the city limits.
* Vast areas of the city are utterly smashed and lie in ruins, making
home of the American automobile industry, into a wasteland
which resembles a war zone.
And the reason for all of
to the US Census Bureau’s 2010 census, 1.23% of Detroit’s population is Asian, 81.84% is black, 10.42% is white,
and 6.51% is “other.” Interestingly, the “Hispanic” population,
which could be of any race, is counted as 6.56%, whatever that might mean.
The racial sea
change in Detroit provides the key to understanding the collapse in that city.
In 1930, 92.3% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1940, 90.8% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1950, 83.63% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1960, 70.8% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1970, 56.0% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1980, 35.7% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1990, 22.2% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 2000, 12.3% of Detroit’s population was white.
And in 2010, the
white population had dropped to around 10%, although
this figure will also no
doubt include “Hispanics” and Middle Easterners.
The destruction of the once-great city of Detroit into a Third World
hell-hole is one of the most
obvious glimpses into western civilisation’s
future if current racial demographic trends continue.
Only the willingly blind will not see.
Migrant Invasion - The Illuminati Plan for White Genocide
March 1, 2016
1912 book exposes Illuminati Jewish war against white race.
The migrant invasion of Europe and the US can
be traced to a long-term Illuminati Jewish program
to destroy the white race.
Jew, Myron Fagan reveals this program,
and Dan (comment below) shows that George Soros is financing this racist assault.
This article focuses on the US but
its pertinence to Europe
Wikipedia will tell you that the book "A Racial Program for the
20th Century" (1912)
is another anti-Semitic hoax. It says the book and author Israel Cohen didn't exist.
The reason for this lie?
This book contains a famous passage that reveals the Illuminati-Communist
race strategy, later applied to women and other minorities in the guise of "feminism" and "diversity":
"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial
By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries
they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program
Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming
the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instil in the
whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the
Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life,
in the professions
and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will
be able tointermarry with the whites and begin a process
which will deliver America to our cause."
Thomas Abernathy read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103,
p. 8559, top of page.) Wikipedia tells you Abernathy read the quotation
in a letter to the Editor of the
Star, and the newspaper subsequently determined it was a hoax and apologized.
"The quotation has retained some popularity among racists
and anti-Semites to this day," Wikipedia chortles.
I have subsequently added this
line to the Wiki entry: "However, the author fits the description of Israel
Cohen (1879-1961) a prolific Zionist author who wrote the Foreword to Israel Zangwill's
as well as 30 other books. Like many purported "hoaxes,"
the quotation does describe events as they
removed by Ziopedia.
was the General Secretary of the World Zionist Organization.
If this is the same Cohen, it means Zionism and Communism were identical.
"International" Jews, like other globalists, serve the
Rothschilds' sick megalomaniac program of world
government dictatorship. "National" Jews, like other patriots, owe their first loyalty to their country
fought the bankers' Communist agenda for the best part of his life.
Myron Fagan, a successful Broadway playwright and director, met Israel Cohen,
Israel Zangwill and George Bernard Shaw at a party to celebrate
the opening of
play The Melting Pot in 1910. He knew the three
men to be founders
of the Fabian
Society. Cohen told Fagan he was planning to write "A Racial Program
for the 20th Century" as a "humanitarian" follow up to "The Melting Pot."
At the time,
Fagan didn't realize that the play, which described how Jews and Blacks triumph
against White prejudice, was pure propaganda, part of the
Communist campaign of fostering "guilt" in white Liberals
It all fell into place in 1957 when Fagan read the Washington Star
quotation in the context of the debate over school desegregation. In 1966, he recalled:
"That book was published in 1913 ... the NAACP and the ADL were created
[by the bankers] almost simultaneously to carry out those directives. That was
more than a half-century
there be any doubt that that was intended to launch our present Negro upheaval for a Black Revolution?
(left, Dylan Roof shot up a black church in Charleston SC in 2015)
"If that isn't
enough evidence, in 1935, the Communist Party's 'Workers Library
Publishers' issued a pamphlet entitled 'THE NEGROES IN A SOVIET AMERICA.'
It urged the Negroes to rise up, especially in the South,
and form a Soviet State in
the South, and apply for admission into the Soviet Union ... it contained implicit
assurance that the 'revolt' would be supported by all American
Reds, and on page
it promised that a Soviet government would confer greater benefits on Negroes than
on Whites and that 'Any act of discrimination or prejudice
against a Negro will
become a crime under the Revolutionary law ...
" ... When Abernathy published that Israel Cohen excerpt in the Congressional Record, we
Guild, Inc.) promptly issued a 'News-Bulletin' in which we published the
entire story -- and warned of the coming Negro uprisings...
"Two years went by and nobody even tried to deny the matter, but, suddenly, after two years,
and similar groups had ferreted out ALL copies of the book and destroyed them, they announced that
the whole thing was a fraud, that there never had been such
a book, or an 'Israel Cohen' ... Why did they wai
t two years? And how could they deny the existence of a writer named Israel Cohen in the face of
all the books
written? Copies of which I have. More important, bear in mind that Israel Cohen had been a prime
mover in all 'Fabian Socialist' and Communist movements
in England -- also that I
had met him in person when he actually discussed the book at that banquet."
Click on this text to watch Why They want to REPLACE YOU...
and yet it is never mentioned by the mainstream
Click on this text to watch a commotion caused by Its OK To Be White Signs that Popped Up In a Fort Worth Neighborhood...
Police Called to Investigate “It’s Okay to be White” Signs
In Forth Worth, Texas
someone decided to post signs saying, “it’s okay to be White” around
a neighborhood. This has prompted calls for a police investigation and local news coverage.
They’re trying to claim that a completely
innocuous sign saying that there’s nothing wrong with being a White person
is some type of racist and evil statement. The fact that there is so much hysteria over this,
proves yet again the anti-White bias and hatred that exists in the United States of America.
And comically if you watch the news report, the local politician
Cary Moon says that he’s against people posting literature
that might offend
people. Well that means you are against the First Amendment and free speech you stupid fuck.
As far as I’m concerned, all anti-White hating bigots should
be removed from the country.
If they don’t like the people who founded
this nation, than they don’t deserve to be here.
THE PRIMARY JEWS BEHIND OPENING THE IMMIGRANT
- Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
- Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
Pfeffer (Former President of American Jewish Congress (AJC)
- Norman Podhoretz (Writer and
Member of The Council on Foreign Relations - former leftist, now a Jewish neo-con)
Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article
entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration
levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives,
introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration
Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish
Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,”
(he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith,
(there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open
the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties
leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
The main author of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was Jewish assistant attorney
Norbert A. Schlei (1929-2003). (Schlei also wrote the Voting Rights Act of 1965).
Jewish Arnold Aronson (1911-1998) was founder and leader
of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR).
a powerful coalition of political and religious groups, organized major, countrywide lobbying efforts
to aid passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
and Javits were fanatical Zionists as well:
When it was unclear that President Harry Truman would support Zionism,
Cellar and a committee of Zionists told him
had persuaded Dewey to support the Zionist policy and demanded that Truman also take this stand. Cellar
reportedly pounded on Truman‘s table and said that if Truman did not do
so, “We’ll run you out of town. When he and
a colleague opposed a Zionist resolution in Congress, Emanuel Celler, a New York Democrat who was to serve in
Congress for almost 50 years, told them: “They ought to take
you b…s out and shoot you.” Jacob Javits, another well-known
senator, this time Republican, told a Zionist women’s group: “We’ll fight to death
and make a Jewish State
in Palestine if it’s
the last thing that we do.” From: Alison Weir on the Early Days of the Israel Lobby
Double standards from the start...!
THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE
1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW
THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965
with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.
While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified
nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and “bribing” the law into
existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive
efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility.
Jews are a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews
have a guilt complex - and for good
reason.) Jews fear a homogenous Christian culture of which
they would never ascend to influential positions. Rather, in
a homogenous Christian culture,
Jews are looked upon, (and rightly so), as “Christ-killers.” This is why
tried to get Mel Gibson’s movie, The Passion of Jesus Christ, removed from the silver screen.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the
following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the American Jewish Congress:
—— “Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding
which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the
concept of cultural pluralism.” ——
Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz
(Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)
Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the
Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits
authored an article
entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration
500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over
40 years in the House of Representatives,
introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart
Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”),
wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,”
still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai
(there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration
the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish
conspiracy as seen in its effects.
The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived
peoples will no longer be a majority
of the population of America due to the massive influx
of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from
anything remotely resembling Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,”
these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically
and politically. And expand
they will and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to
retain demographic, political,
and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews
as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’
THE JEWS ARE GUILTY of the ruination of America. What can we do to stop them even now
before the final sliciing of their knives into the effecting of the circumcision of our nation?
DO UNTO THEM BEFORE THEY DO MORE UNTO YOU
"Then and only then can we be 'more than
conquerors through Him who loves us.' And who will we the
The enemies of our Lord, the Jews!" ...Brother Nathanael (Street Evangelist)
Americans still compose 63% of the population of the USA. Anyone watching
television in America now days will get the mistaken idea that African
nearly half of the population of the USA judging by their prominence on the TV screen.
African Americans compose only 13% of the population
of the USA. Hispanics compose
18% but are absolutely under-represented on television. Asians compose 3% of the
population of the USA but are more prominant
on television than Hispanics. The JEWS
who own and control television are deliberately engineering these misconceptions and
have been engineering non-European immigration
since the HART-CELLAR Immigration Act of 1965.
As California goes, so eventually goes the USA: California is now 39.7% White
and dropping - Hispanic 37.4 and rising - Black 6% - Asian 13.3% - Other 3.6%
The Immigration and Nationality
Act of 1965 (H.R. 2580; Pub.L. 89–236, 79 Stat. 911,
enacted June 30, 1968), also known as the Hart–Celler
Act, changed the way quotas
were allocated by ending the National Origins Formula that had been in place in the
United States since the Emergency
Quota Act of 1921. Representative Emanuel Celler
of New York proposed the bill, Senator Philip Hart of Michigan co-sponsored it,
Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts helped to promote it.
The Hart–Celler Act abolished the quota system based on national origins
that had been American
policy since the 1920s. The 1965 Act marked a change from past U.S. policy which had discriminated against non-northern
The JEWS know full well that a homogeneous country is very difficult
cannot be commanded, but it can be promoted.
Depriving Whites of the possibility to be among themselves
terms of residence, study, work and recreation is one thing.
Suggesting miscegenation in films, TV series
is another thing. There is nowadays hardly any form of media
that is not full of this race mixing propaganda,
form, 'thanks' to the Jews who control the media.
The United Sates became the
prime target for mongrelization after the virtual destruction of Germany in World War
II by weakening and undermining its power. It is the unswerving goal of world Jewry to mongrelize America,
and all White
counties, and phase out the magnificent White Race
from the face of this planet. Very few are aware that all their civil
gibberish is just a smoke screen hiding the real Jewish objective. Mongrelization is their real objective, lets make
no mistake about it. The Jew-ridden United States of America is veritably
Jew-heaven, the new JerUSAlem, and the
White gentiles are being
looted and ravaged by their Jewish masters at will.
The United States is under especially heavy attack by the Jews because it is
the last and most significant power base
of the White Race. This
is why the Jewish drive for integration in the States is at its most ferocious peak of intensity.
Here, the Jew realizes, he must break the back of White resistance to his programme of mongrelization.
He knows full
well that it is in the United States that his whole
precarious conspiracy might well blow up in his face if he does not.
Tribe of Judah also knows that it is in the United States that the movement could spawn that would come to the
rescue of the White Race in the rest of the world. For this reason the black
is breeding most rapidly in this welfare state,
and why the Mexican
half-caste Indians are invading and breeding by the millions without resistance, and why the
United States has now become the open magnet of all the scum races of the world.
Even more devastating result are achieved in the U.S. homeland itself by the Jewish propaganda,
marriages. The Jew is bending the White Man`s
thinking towards accepting, condoning and entering into mixed
by cheer force of massive, overwhelming propaganda. The Jewish controlled Supreme court have completely
destroyed the laws prohibiting inter-racial marriages. Unless the White Race wants to become another
dark race within the next two generations at
most, it must soon change its attitude and its course of action. By pumping
the black blood of Africa into the veins of White America, the fanatic Jews are reaching their unswerving goal to poison
the White Man`s genes. They are committing similar atrocities in all other
White countries, whether they be England,
Sweden, France, Holland
The instinctive hatred between the races in
any multi-racial society is permanent and irreconcilable. In this kind of society
the White Race is especially hated by the blacks and all the other dark races of the world. They feel inferior
and both for good reason ! The superior is always
envied and hated by the inferior. The weak hate the strong; the poor
hate the rich; the sick hate the healthy; the dumb hate the intelligent; the ugly hate the beautiful, and the dark races
the White. We must always see to it that the superior survives
and the inferior is sacrificed, when forced to make a choice
between the two. The Jewish objective is to get the White Race to accept the blacks as our equal, get us to inter-marry.
Wouldn`t it be better to bring the apes up to the level of the blacks and
have them interbreed ? If we are going to start
and “uplifting”, why not start at the lowest rung of the ladder where the “need” is greatest ?
Lets now take a look at what the Jew wants the White Race to interbreed with.
In the last 6000 years the African black
has invented nothing.
The black have never been known to build a dam. The average African black I.Q. is about 40 points
lower than the average White, putting his average well below the moron class. The average American
black is somewhere
around 80, a good 20 points below the average
White, and this is because they have assimilated a large quantity of White
blood and are actually mulattoes. Therefore the American black is on the borderline of the moron classification, with a
large percentage being actually in the moron category. Feel like inter-breeding
We must propagate the fact that there is a far greater gap
between the intellect of our leading White geniuses and that
of the black, than there is between the black and the next highest ape. We must realize that the blacks` natural level of
existence is more closely related to that of animals than it is to the great
and high civilization of the White Race. On this
point, we disclaim
any common racial denominator with the blacks, the same as we do regarding monkeys. Like the horse,
the dark races at certain times have served a temporary usefulness, but unlike the horse, the dark
races have mostly
impeded and stymied the White Man`s progress.
The black boasts about “Black Culture” where none exists, and talk
about “Black Pride” where there is very little to be proud of. Although the black is the most
useless component in the
modern White Mam`s world, he is a very
dangerous, festering, and rapidly spreading cancer in our racial body.
are the means by which the Jews plan to destroy the White Race.
Busing Our Children
The Jews know that in order to get
inter-racial marriages accepted, they have to embark on a tyrannical power drive to
mix black and White children at an early age. Being more impressionable and more easily deceived, the young
are the prime target of the Jews. The smokescreen used
by Jew-promoted blacks to enforce this campaign is so-called
“equal opportunities”. What this means is that education has to be downgraded for the blacks to pass. The damage
be seen when comparing I.Q.`s of White children who got “equal
opportunities” and those who didn`t. Our lamentable
children have become victims of a heinous Jewish crime. Our total education programme is in a shambles thanks
to our alien government enforcing a programme of school busing and forced integration
of the races.
The colleges took the same road. The Jews
have turned our colleges into centres for brain pollution rather than education
and are being constantly invaded by the Jewish idea of race mixing. The colleges` trouble has progressed
along the same
lines as the churches`. First destroy the young
men`s sense of respect for the ancient foundations, and then fill it with Jewish
revolutionary social doctrines. These two always go together and cannot live apart, and are the fulfillment
of the Protocol`s
programme to split non-Jewish society by means
There is a simple solution. All that is necessary for the White
student to know is that the attacking force is Jewish.
Jewish programme cannot endure; “you must not use the term ‘Jew’, they say, “you must not identify
The answer is to identify the source and nature of
the influence. The White students` choice is between the Tribe of
and the Anglo-Saxon. In making up their allegiance, let the White student decide whether they want to follow
those who seek to tear down, or the Builders. Calling our White students back
to a pride of race is the only absolute
antidote to the Jewish
influence. It is not a case for argument. If the White students decide on following this council
of dark rebellion and destruction, it is because they do not know whose sons they are, of what
race they are the scions.
Let there be free intercourse of ideas
and free speech in our colleges, but let Jewish thoughts be labelled Jewish,
and let the White students know the racial secret.
This programme consists of opening
wide the doors to the blacks although they are not wanted, and although the
realtors, builders and landlords know that the blacks will ruin their property values. The Zionist Occupied Government
has cowed and coerced these forces to do its bidding.
treachery, Zionist Occupied Governments in White countries, has aided the dark races to achieve in the
20th century what they could not win in the 19th century by force of arms. By means of subsidization;
by means of welfare;
by means of immigration they have allowed
illegal dark race aliens to invade our White borders by the millions. These dark
races have been deliberately aided and imported into White states by the strong arm of the Zionist Occupied
itself and at the expense of, and to the detriment
of the White taxpayer. The Zionist Occupied Governments is encouraging
this massive invasion, and is taking an active hand in deliberately importing the riff-raff from all over the world. The
dark races of the world are to be deployed according
to the Jewish plan to act as shock troops to mongrelize the superior
Race, and exterminate those that will not mongrelize. They are swarming in by the millions and are taking our land
and living space. What is the difference if they are doing so as a military
army or as civilian invaders ?
The Jews are now deliberately shipping
hordes of dark races into the British Kingdom, injecting a foul pollution where
no pollution ever existed. The same can be said of the United States. In the last stronghold of the White
became business, a strictly Jewish business.
The Immigration Department favoured White immigrants from Europe in
years, because America was deemed to be a White country. In the last few decades it has swung heavily the
other way. Whites are now kept, out while the rest of the scum of the world
is flocking into the United States with the full
the Jew-controlled Immigration Department ! They also promote programmes to bring dark children into the
United States to increase the mongrelization of the land. Through the misdirection of the churches,
many such orphans
are adopted to affluent White homes, only to
grow up and marry into White society.
Madonna and Angelina Jolie/Brad
Pitt are examples.
The Tammany- [Democratic Party in
America] and Jewish Kehillah leaders have always been alertly aware of the fact
that their power depended upon an uninterrupted flow of immigration. The best material for the Jewish Kehillah`s
has always been the foreigner, until America became so
thoroughly un-Americanized as to make intensive immigration
longer essential. In 1884 a great influx of immigration occurred into the United States, causing the degeneration of
New York, and then of American life. After the arrival of Russian, Austrian
and Hungarian Jews, an memorable period of
crime followed, the
marks of which remain to this day. These Eastern Jews were hailed as “German” and “British” scientists.
The laws of the country are set aside in open contempt by the Jewish immigrants.
They are able to “arrange” the passport
“arrange” avoidance of the health regulations. Their first glimpse of life in the States shows a Jewish control
as potent and complete as it is Russia; they can come from anywhere, and
are coming from anywhere !
From that moment, Jewish immigration
set in strongly toward South America, principally Brazil. The Jews of Brazil found
it necessary to emigrate in the direction of the Dutch colony of what is now New York, because of military
a disagreement between the Brazilians and the
Dutch. Peter Stuyvesant, the Dutch governor, ordered them to leave
he did not entirely approve of their settling among his people. The Jews had evidently taken the precaution to
assure their being received if not welcomed, because upon revoking the order
of Stuyvesant, the Directors gave as one
of the reasons for the
Jews being received, “the large amount of capital which they have invested in the shares of the company”.
Stuyvesant compelled the Jews to make New York the principle port of America,
and though a majority of New York Jews
had fled to Philadelphia
at the time of the American Revolution, most of them returned at the earliest opportunity, instinct
seeming to make them aware that, in New York was to be their principle paradise of gain. And so
it has proved until this day.
It not only houses the greatest
center of Jewish population in the world, but the very land of the city is the holdings of the Jews.
New York is the gateway where the bulk of American imports and exports are taxed, and where practical
all the business
done in the United States pays tribute to the
masters of money.
Therefore it should not be strange that the
smaller nations of Europe refers to America as “The Jews`Country”, with the
alarming increase in Jewish immigration bringing the question to public attention again. No wonder
that Jewish writers,
viewing this unchecked growth in wealth
and power, this unprecedented prosperity, exclaim with their usual arrogance
that the United States is the Promised Land foretold by the prophets, interest and profits are the “milk and honey”,
New York is New Jerusalem ! They further describe the peaks
of the Rockies as “the mountains of Zion”, and with reason,
the coastal and mining wealth of the Jews is considered. It should be of interest to the student that Columbus` voyage
was associated with at least five Jews : Luis de Torres, interpreter; Marco,
the surgeon; Bernal, the physician;
Alonzo de la Calle, and Gabriel
Sanchez. De Torres was the first man ashore and also the first to discover the use of tobacco.
After settling in Cuba he became the father of Jewish control of the tobacco business as it exists
Click on his text to see how Israel Is Directly Helping Muslims And Africans Invade Europe...
A semi-clandestine group that helped over 15,000
non-European benefit bandits to illegally get into Europe has been
caught on tape admitting to systematically training asylum seekers to exploit screening interviews by faking trauma
Ariel Ricker, the executive director of America-based Advocates Abroad, a major non-profit
NGO which provides legal
aid to migrants, has been caught
on tape openly discussing how she teaches refugees to lie to border agents. The video
was released by Canadian right-wing activist, author and internet personality, Lauren Southern.
It will be
part of her new documentary film project
‘Borderless,’ which takes on the European migration crisis.
are funded by globalist corporations including the notorious Rockefeller Brothers Fund, which adds fuel
to the flames of those who claim that the crisis overwhelming Europe is Jewish controlled.
Similar corrupt traffickers in human misery are EU and UN funded.
its website, Advocates Abroad claims to have helped as many as 15,000 migrants cross the Greek border and 2,500
more outside of Greece. The organization is massive, taking volunteers from major universities,
and was even featured in a documentary film by the International Bar Association.
the footage, Ricker describes how the organization provides training sessions for migrants seeking entry into Europe,
in which they are taught how to act during interviews with border
agents: “I tell them this is acting, all of this is acting…
for them to get through, they must act their part in the theatre.”
also calls EASO (European Asylum Support Office) personnel tasked with screening the migrants “f***ing stupid.”
She goes on to describe a formula that the organization has created
to exploit them in screening interviews.
One method she teaches migrants is to exploit
the presumed Christian sympathies of the predominantly Eastern
Orthodox Greece by pretending to have been persecuted for being Christian. She even
describes telling them how to pray during interviews, ironically because doing so reflects
The organization, which was founded in 2016,
helped to shuffle migrants into a cash-strapped Greece, which was
struggling to recover from its long-term government-debt crisis. The majority of migrants
seeking entry into Europe first come through Greece, with arrivals peaking in 2015.
Ironically, some of the real victims of the NGO’s tactics are refugees as genuine refugees were forced to
fake candidates trained to trick the system.
Ricker’s drama coaching even instructed its pupils to feign the emotions of
trauma survivors, seemingly without a thought for those seeking asylum who don’t
need to pretend to be suffering from trauma.
In the past few years, Greece’s migrant camps have
become dangerously overcrowded, resulting in violence and disease
which the UN described as having reached “boiling point.” But Advocates Abroad isn’t
responsible for maintaining the refugee camps;
only job is getting people through the gate.
Southern claims that the UNHCR has already responded to the
tapes by saying that they are
“alarmed by these
reports,” and the backlash on social media has been understandably strong.
Click on this text to see Who's behind the race mixing agenda in advertising...
Click on this text to watch EUROPA - The Last Battle - Part 5 [Final cut]...
Click on this text to watch America Is Not a Nation of Immigrants
Click on this text to watch The Endgame - Full White Genocide Documentary...
When a state
is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population
will hold the Stage together and maintain it's existence through astonishingly
misgovernment and maladministration.
But the situation is utterly different in a
country where the population is not homogeneous,
where there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand.
will happen one day when hordes of emancipated slaves come forth
from these dens of misery to swoop down on their unsuspecting fellow men?
For this other world does not think about such a possibility.
allowed these things
to go on without caring and even without suspecting
- in their total lack of instinctive understanding - that sooner or later
destiny will take it's vengeance unless it will have been appeased in time."
Click on this text to watch America is NOT a Nation of Immigrants or a Melting Pot | The Truth About Immigration into America...
plan – The genocide of the Peoples of Europe
Mass immigration is a phenomenon the causes of which are cleverly concealed by the political
elites, and the multicultural
propaganda is employed to falsely portray it as
inevitable. In this article we intend to prove once and for all, that mass
immigration is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What the elites try to present as an inevitability of modern
life, is actually
the product of a plan conceived around a table and prepared over
decades, to completely change the face of our continent.
Few people know
that one of the main instigators of the process of European integration, was a man who also conceived
the genocide of the peoples of Europe. He was a sinister individual whose existence is
unknown to the masses of
our people, but the political elites consider him as
the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard von
His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections
to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis), and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama.
to his close contacts with European aristocrats and politicians, and due to the network of relationships created
his nobleman-diplomat father, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was able to work unseen,
away from the glare of
publicity, and he managed to engage the co-operation of
the most influential heads of state for his plan, making them
and collaborators for his “project of European integration”.
In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna,
which aimed to create a New World Order, based on
a federation of nations led
by the United States. European integration would be just the first step in creating a world
government. His earliest supporters included Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš,
and the German
Jewish banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks.
The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next
president of Austria, Karl
Renner, took early responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement and later, French
politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi etc., offered their help.
With the rise of
Fascism in Europe during the 1930s, the project of European integration was abandoned and the
“Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve. However, after the Second World War, and thanks
to frantic and
tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish
Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers
like the New York
Times, Kalergi managed to gain acceptance for his plan by the United States Government and later
the CIA became involved in driving the plan towards completion.
The essence of the Kalergi plan
In his book «Praktischer Idealismus»,
Kalergi explains that the citizens of the future “United States of Europe” will not
be the people of the Old Continent, but a new mixed breed, the products of thorough and widespread miscegenation.
He states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and other non-White
races, to create a multiracial
population, with not clear sense of tradition
or identity and therefore easily controlled by the ruling elite.
Kalergi proclaims the need to abolish
the right of nations to self-determination and outlines the break-up of nation
states through the use of ethnic separatist movements and the destruction of the nations themselves through mass
migration. In order for Europe to be easily controlled by the future elite, Kalergi
proposes the creation of a homogeneous
mixed breed population, and as to
who should be the new elite? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this point:
The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the
elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar
in appearance to the
Ancient Egyptians, will replace the current diversity of
peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying
Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status
as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that
the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus,
the compassionate care given by Europe created
a new breed of aristocrats. This
happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews
[due to the actions taken by the French Revolution]
Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles
of the European Union. The belief that
the peoples of Europe should be mixed
with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity, to break down traditional
of living and create a single mixed race, is the reason for community policies that promote minority interests.
The underlying motives are not really humanitarian, but because the power behind the ruthless
the EU plans the greatest genocide in history.
A prestigious prize
is awarded every two years by the Coudenhove-Kalergi Foundation to Europeans who have
excelled in promoting this criminal plan. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman
The facilitation of genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals from
the United Nations, demanding that we
accept millions of immigrants to help counter
the low birth rate among Europeans. According to a report published in
2000 by the population division of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement:
A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need to accept 159,000,000
migrants by 2025.
the citing of such precise numbers is evidence of a premeditated plan. Clearly a
low birth-rate can easily be reversed
with appropriate measures to support families
and it is equally clear that the introduction of alien genes will do nothing
to preserve our genetic heritage but destroy it. The consequence of current policies promoting multiracialism
is to create
a weakened disparate population without national,
historical or cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi
been and still are, the basis of official government policies intent upon the genocide of the Peoples of
through mass immigration.
G. Brock Chisholm, a former director of the World Health Organization
(OMS), demonstrated this well when he said:
“What people everywhere need
to do is to limit births and promote mixed marriages (between the different races),
the outcome will be the creation of a single race throughout the world which can be directed by a
central authority. “
If we look around us, the implementation
of the Kalergi Plan seems to be at an advanced stage. We face Europe’s
fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year thousands of young people of
mixed race: ‘The children of Kalergi’. Under the dual pressures of misinformation
and humanitarian stupefaction,
promoted by the mass media, we Europeans
are being taught to renounce our origins, and to renounce our
servants of globalization are trying to convince us that to deny our identity, is a progressive and humanitarian
act, that “racism” is wrong, because they want us all to be blind consumers. It
is necessary, now more than ever, to
counter the lies of the System, to awaken
the revolutionary spirit among Europeans. Every one must be made
aware of this
truth, that European integration amounts to genocide. We have no other option, the alternative is
Translator’s note: Although the reasons due to which Kalergi made the choices he made are of no particular
to us, we will try to answer a question that will surely our readers
have already asked: Why a European aristocrat with
Flemish, Polish, Greek-Byzantine
roots and even with some samurai blood in his veins (from his mother) was such
plans and organ in the hands of dark forces? The reasons, in our opinion, are multiple, idiosyncratic, psychological
and … women.
We therefore observe a personality with strong snobbish attitudes,
arrogance, and, allow me the term, “degenerate elitism.”
fact that his mother was Asian, perhaps created internal conflicts and frustrations, something that can happen
to people with such temperament. But the most decisive factor must have been the “proper
teenager”, which incidentally
of course, was beside him, and became his
first woman (at age 13): The Jewess Ida Roland, who would later become a famous actress.
The award of the
Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize to President Van Rompuy
On November 16th 2012, the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, was
awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize,
during a special conference in Vienna,
to celebrate 90 years of pan-European movement. The prize is awarded every two years to
leading personalities for their outstanding contribution to the process of European integration.
A decisive factor that helped him win
the prize was the balanced way in which President Van Rompuy executed his
in the new position of President of the European Council, which was established by the Treaty of Lisbon. He
handled this particularly sensitive leading and coordinating role with a spirit of determination
while emphasis was also given to his skilful arbitration
on European affairs and unfailing commitment to European
During his speech,
Mr Van Rompuy described the unification of Europe as a peace project. This idea, which was also the
objective of the work of Coudenhove-Kalergi, after 90 years is still important. The award bears the name of Count
Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), philosopher, diplomat, publisher and
founder of the Pan-European
Movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer
of European integration and popularized the idea of a federal
Europe with his
the winners of the award, the Federal Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and the President of
Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga (2006), are included.
This article is a translation of an Italian article, originally posted
DOCUMENTED PROOF By: Dr. Edward R. Fields circa
Source: https://katana17.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/jews-behind-race-mixing/ Contents Jew
Civil Rights Bill Author
— Jacob Javits Jews Behind Race-Mixing in America The Answers Are Complex Here Are the
Facts From Their
Own Mouths — The Jews Reveal Their Plans Jews Raise Money for Blacks
BEHIND RACE-MIXING IN AMERICA The purpose of this article is to prove, through document ed
evidence that Jews
in America are the prime movers and
proof: Jews behind race mixing [Edward R Fields] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Edward Reed - Jews behind race mixing.pdf - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read
each Jewish Community in every city of any size in America the Jews operate numerous organizations.
They are designed to guide and control the lives of every Jew.
behind Race Mixing Holocaust of America ... Is race-mixing wanted by the elites
and the media?
... Who is Behind the Hollywood Race Mixing Agenda?
suggests a sinister and subliminal purpose behind the race mixing trend.
... Why Are Jews Primarily
Behind The Push For Forced-Multiculturalism In The ...
strives to portray the folly behind that favorite motto of the jews, Liberte, Fraternity,
Egalite, while at
the same time exposing the devils for what they truly are.
Why does the Alt-Right claim that the Jewish people
are behind race-mixing and homosexuality?
Mixing And Inter-racial Marriages – The Jews Hoax On The White Race
When we look at how past White
civilizations were destroyed by the Jewish conspiracy,
we can clearly see what their central aim and objective was, and still is today.
White Genocide: The Dystopian Nightmare To Come
The Ethnic European
The nightmare world awaiting our children in the year 2050 will
be a world of unimaginable terror for anyone with a white skin.
and abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
with added notes and comments
IS THIS THE FUTURE?
Ethnic-Europeans, who make up
95% of Europe, the smallest continent, are baffled by the sinister anti-White
propaganda displayed in commercial advertising. Propaganda promoting mixed-race relationships, particularly
white women with black men, has become so general that even the least observant have
begun to take notice.
Based on small glimpses of marketing sub-culture, one might assume
half or more of all relationships involve some
sort of race-mixing. The combination
of white women with black men is the most common mixed-race couple
If race diversity advertising was truly about appealing to the greatest number of customers, it seems an odd strategy
focus so much on one combination, while ignoring so many others. This suggests
a sinister and subliminal purpose:
to promote race mixing and make
it seem trendy. (All phrases in italics have been added to the text by Lasha Darkmoon. — Ed)
THE MIXED RACE IDEAL IS A LIE
that ethnic-Europeans are the least likely to marry outside of their race. Mixed race relationships are
provably flawed. In terms of combined average incomes of interracial marriages, black husbands with white wives
earned the lowest amount of any other combination. The black husband and white
wife combination were also the least educated.
Of the interracial combinations, marriages between whites and blacks were found to
be the least stable and the most
likely to result in divorce. A study of
over two million online dating interactions revealed distinct racial preferences between
groups. White women are strongly against race-mixing; they respond most frequently to white men and least
to black men. In light of this data, it is all the more bizarre
that the combination of a white woman with a black man is seen
Why are the advertisers engaging in this mischievous social engineering? Who are they exactly? And who is financing
RACE BASTARDISATION HAS PROVED TO BE A CATACLYSMIC FAILURE
Sexually transmitted disease rates per the 2016 Centre for Disease
Control speak for themselves. A 2015 study examined
the outcomes of women
that have children with black men. The results were staggering. Currently, 70% of black
children are born out of wedlock; however, when the mother is white and the father black, the rate jumps to 97%.
98% of white mothers
studied reported that the father does not support their children financially, 97% report the father
is not in the child’s life, and 97% of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children.
Only 10% of women that have children with black men out of wedlock end up marrying
The vast majority of white women that have children with black men live
far below the poverty line.
In a 2013 study of intimate partner violence in relationships, which surveyed nearly 10,000 people, the authors
concluded that interracial couples experienced higher levels of violence compared
to same race relationships.
IDENTIFYING WHITE SUCKERS
Idealistic youth lacks discernment.
LD: The younger the people questioned, the more likely they are to
parrot the politically correct party line
that interracial relationships and
interbreeding are good things. Young college graduates, exposed to
indoctrination at their universities, are also more likely to support this fashionable hogwash.
A good rule of thumb is this: if you wish to know what the truth is on any given subject, ask the average
person under thirty — and then believe the opposite! Experience has taught me that the most moronic
easily brainwashed Whites will be found among young women in their twenties
like the pretty girl in this picture. [LD]
noted researcher says that after a considerable amount of spent time in academia he concludes
that the longer one spends in academia, the more apt one is to be indoctrinated by critical theory.
LD: By “critical
theory” is meant, basically, the communist doctrines of Cultural Marxism and the
School, a movement widely known to be predominantly Jewish and based on the teachings
Marx and Freud: promoting atheistic nihilism, hatred of Christianity and traditional moral values,
and the promotion of abortion, radical feminism, race mixing, homosexuality, pornography, and, ultimately,
the normalisation of sexual degeneracy and deviance.
(For more on this subject,
see Satan’s Secret Agents: The Frankfurt School and their Evil Agenda
and The Architects of Evil).
Pew Research 2010 found that 69% of people surveyed said that single women having children is a bad thing, 43%
say unmarried couples raising children is a bad thing, yet hypocritically only 14% say interracial
marriage is a bad thing.
There is something particularly dumb about being in
favour of interracial relationships, while at the same time conceding the
outcomes of those relationships.
Research reveals that whites are the least likely to marry outside of their race. When white
women marry outside
of their race, they are more likely to be abused, to become
single-mothers, and live in poverty. Whites dating
outside of their race
exposes them (and all of us) to a higher chance of contracting a sexually transmitted disease.
We know that despite fashionable acceptance,
white people continue to show a natural disgust response to
We also know that despite the tsunami of diversity propaganda in films, television,
and in advertisements,same-race couples are still the most common relationships, by far.
MALICE BEHIND RACE-MIXING PROPAGANDA
Few believe that
interracial advertising under the guise of “diversity” is about selling clothes or laundry detergent or
cereal. The real purpose of mixed race advertising is to present a distorted worldview:
to humiliate and mock whites and make them feel guilty of the crimes of colonialism.
White men are the
last vanguard against the intrigues of an ethnic group who historically hate Europeans. White women
are displayed with non-white men not to sell items but as a tactic of psychological warfare against European culture
civilisation. White men are rarely portrayed in a favourable light; they
are often shown as overweight,
goofy, clumsy half-wits who rely on women or non-whites
to make them look passably human.
Studies suggest the average American is exposed to as many as 5,000 advertisements
in a day. The power of advertising
has the power to condition us to be more accepting
of social change. The prevalence of mixed-race couples and an
increase of LGBT
representation have in no small way changed social attitudes. Although intuitive reactions of
disgust remain, outward social attitudes have become accepting of all forms of degeneracy and social decay.
BLACKS AGAINST WHITES
These images have an effect on black men as well. Blacks are constantly being told by the film industry, TV, and
advertising, that dating white women is natural and are falsely led to believe
that white women prefer black men to
white partners. Faced by reality, the distaste
towards blacks by white women causes
resentment which leads to rape, violence
and the racist humiliation of white women.
Nearly 100% of interracial rapes are white women being raped by non-white men (National
Survey, 2008, Table 42). These advertising images,
which have no small part in warping
mentality, not only promote a dysgenic society,
they place Whites in a grave danger.
THE SINISTER HAND BEHIND WHITE
The most belligerent example of anti-white propaganda came from Netflix via a set of three commercials for the company.
The series of the three Netflix commercials is titled “The Couple”, which
features a white woman and a black man.
The Netflix commercial “Open Relationship” depicts two couples, an interracial
couple, and a white couple. The white
man is depicted as small, weak, insecure,
“non-progressive” and closed-minded. His white girlfriend quickly decides
to cast him aside to spend the evening with the interracial couple, as the black
man quite literally steals the man’s girlfriend in front of him, humiliating him.
HLG Studios out of Los Angeles
was behind the production of these three creepy commercials. The advertising company
has worked on campaigns for a myriad of national brands, from fast food chains to banks, technology companies, and
clothing retailers. HLG Studios was founded by Yuri Baranovsky, the same
carpetbagger who directed Netflix’s race-mixing, anti-white propaganda pieces.
Yuri Baranovsky is Jewish, an
ethnic group that is vehemently opposed to Jews forming relationships
their own ethnic group. Just four Jewish owned mega-corporations control the vast majority of all
advertising agencies. The Omnicom Group of New York, WPP of London, Publicis of
Paris, and Interpublic of New York are the key corporations in the West. (See picture)
The New York Times states that these companies are so powerful “they can indirectly set
schedules and starve magazines to death or help them to flourish,”
by deciding how and when to spend advertising
dollars. Each company owns
dozens if not hundreds of smaller agencies; Omnicom has bought over 150 firms alone.
Globalist CEO John Wren currently heads Omnicom Group. Omnicom was
founded by Allen Rosenshine, Keith Reinhard,
and John Bernbach, all three are
Jewish and promote the exclusivity of Jews — but work hard to destroy ethnic-European ethnicity.
Long-standing CEO of Publicis (1987–2017)
has been Maurice Lévy, who cited his rabbi grandfather as his greatest
has been honoured by the Anti-Defamation League, for his work fighting anti-Semitism, and
his relentless promotion of “diversity”.
WPP of London was founded and is currently run by Martin Sorrell, who
is a Jew. Chairman and CEO of the
Interpublic Group (IPG), is Michael Isor Roth.
Roth condemned the “white supremacist ideology”
as he wrote in an internal creepy-weepy memo to 50,000 IPG employees.
There is clearly a disproportionate number of Jews and those
with Jewish sympathies involved in mass
media advertising. From
small start-up firms to multi-billion-dollar corporations, all of
are promoting hostile anti-white falsehoods, while praising “diversity” and “inclusion.”
is carefully calculated ethnic-European genocide fuelled by Jewish hatred for Christian Europeans.
These companies are not merely promoting racial bastardisation and trying to appeal
to a wider
range of consumers, they are promoting the increased
abuse and sexual degradation of white women.
The race-destroyers purpose is to recreate a nation without ethnic-Europeans.
Race mixing propaganda says
bluntly that white children are
not wanted in the New Order and White men have no place in the globalists’ nightmarish world.
ON WHITE GENOCIDE
Endnote by Lasha Darkmoon
are two types of genocide: hard genocide and soft genocide. We are all familiar with hard genocide. This
an attempt to get rid of an entire ethnic group by violent means. By mass
murder. The most notable example of a
“hard genocide” in history,
according to politically correct Jewish sources, is the mass murder or “Holocaust” of
six million Jews in WWII by the Hitler regime.
“Soft genocide” is entirely different. This involves getting
rid of an entire race by slow and subtle means, whereby
the victims of the genocide
are either too stupid to notice their own gradual demise, like sheep being led to the
slaughterhouse, or by making the victim population too impotent and comatose to do anything to stop their own bit-by-bit
White genocide basically consists in breeding the White race out of existence by promoting multiculturalism and
immigration from the Third World into our White homelands. Inevitably, over
the course of time, this would lead to the
mongrelization of Whites through
interbreeding with the darker races of Africa, Asia and the Islamic people of the Middle East.
An added bonus would be a marked decline in the general IQ of the neo-European mongrel race, a race of dark-skinned
Untermenschen such as cheerfully envisaged by the founder of the pan-European
Union, Count Coudenhove-Kalergi:
Mensch der fernen Zukunft wird Mischling sein. Die heutigen Rassen und Kasten werden
zunehmen-den Überwindung von Raum, Zeit und Vorurteil zum Opfer fallen. Die eurasisch-negroide
Zukunftsrasse, äußerlich der altägyptischen ähnlich, wird die Vielfalt der Völker
durch eine Vielfalt der Persönlichkeiten ersetzen.
The man of the far future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and castes will fall victim to the increasing
of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid future race, outwardly
similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.
To prepare the world for this “huge transformation” (Barbara Spectre video), meaning White genocide euphemistically
presented as “multiculturalism”, it was first necessary for international Jewry, with their vast financial resources,
gain almost complete control over the mass media. Few will now doubt that
the Jews have
already achieved this, given that they admit it themselves, especially
in the case of Hollywood.
As a consequence of Jewish media control, we are now subjected to constant streams of anti-White propaganda,
both overt and subliminal, designed to make Whites feel bad about themselves as well non-Whites
to regard Whites
with increasing contempt and hostility. Whites are not only
made to feel guilty about the Holocaust and the crimes
of colonialism but to
regard themselves as an essentially flawed race, as morally repugnant and fit only for history’s
garbage dump — in short, as “white trash”.
The soft genocide
of Whites is now being carried out before our very eyes, on a daily basis, as the hordes
of the Third World keep pouring into our White homelands in a never-ending tide. Our end days
are fast approaching, unless we can act quickly to turn the tide back and regain our
White Genocide by Design:
The Role of the Mass Media
in the Destruction of the European People
By FRANKLIN RYCKAERT
Introduced by Lasha Darkmoon
IS THIS THE FUTURE?
“Miscegenation cannot be commanded, but it can
be promoted. Depriving Whites of the possibility to be among
themselves in terms of residence, study, work and recreation is one thing. Suggesting miscegenation in films,
TV series and commercials is another thing. There is nowadays hardly any form of
media that is not full of this
race mixing propaganda,
mostly in subliminal form, and it is the Jews who control the media.”
— Franklin Ryckaert
This meticulously researched article by Franklin Ryckaert, illustrated by a revealing 50-minute video at the end,
presents the following thesis: it was soon after the Holocaust, perceived by Jews collectively
as the single greatest
tragedy in their long history, that a decision was taken
for the “Final Solution” of the European problem:
the systematic elimination of the Jews’ perceived relentless oppressors.
Who were these relentless oppressors?
They were of course
the Jews’ European antagonists, the people who had expelled them from their White homelands
over a hundred times in past centuries, subjecting them to constant pogroms and persecutions over the years. In
cataclysmic climax of anti-Semitic violence, one of these European nations
had finally destroyed six million of
them during the second half of World War
Two. At any rate, so runs the widely accepted mainstream narrative.
How were the Jews to go about rectifying the wrongs of history, or
to put it another way, how were they to get even?
Answer: through “soft
genocide”, a slow and subtle non-violent way of getting rid of their enemies, who, it was
thought, would be too stupid to notice their own demise. Or better still, too impotent to do anything about it.
This soft genocide
basically consists in breeding the White race out of existence by promoting multiculturalism and
mass immigration from the Third World into our White homelands. Inevitably, over the course of time, this would
to the mongrelization of Whites through interbreeding with the darker races
of Africa, Asia and the Islamic people of the
Middle East. An added bonus would
be a marked decline in the general IQ of the neo-European mongrel race, a race
of dark-skinned Untermenschen such as cheerfully envisaged by the founder of the pan-European Union, Count Coudenhove-Kalergi:
Mensch der fernen Zukunft wird Mischling sein. Die heutigen Rassen und Kasten werden der zunehmen-den
Überwindung von Raum, Zeit und Vorurteil zum Opfer fallen. Die eurasisch-negroide Zukunftsrasse, äußerlich
der altägyptischen ähnlich, wird die Vielfalt der Völker durch eine Vielfalt der Persönlichkeiten
The man of the far future will be mixed race. Today’s races and castes will fall victim to the increasing overcoming
space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid future race, outwardly similar to the
ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.
To prepare the world for this “huge transformation“, meaning White genocide euphemistically presented as “multiculturalism”,
it was first necessary for international Jewry, with their vast financial resources, to gain almost complete control
mass media. Few will now doubt that the Jews have already achieved this,
given that they admit it themselves, especially in the case of Hollywood.
As a consequence of Jewish media control, we are now subjected to constant streams of anti-White propaganda, both
overt and subliminal, designed to make Whites feel bad about themselves as well non-Whites
to regard Whites with
increasing contempt and hostility. Whites are not only
made to feel guilty about the Holocaust and the crimes of colonialism
regard themselves as an essentially flawed race, as morally repugnant and fit only for history’s garbage dump —
in short, as white trash.
The soft genocide of Whites is now being carried out before our very eyes, on a daily basis,
as the hordes of the
Third World keep pouring into our White homelands in a never-ending
tide. Our end days are
fast approaching, unless we can act quickly to turn the
tide back and regain our lost lands. [LD]
WHITE GENOCIDE BY DESIGN:
THE ROLE OF THE MASS MEDIA
IN THE DESTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN
by Franklin Ryckaert
Jews are now perceived in many quarters as “supremacists”,
a description they will naturally find offensive. Because
of their “chosenness”,
however, it would appear that many Jews feel entitled not only to monopolize the wealth of the
world but also to appropriate its power. This is clearly articulated by their prophet Isaiah in the Old Testament
the Jew is told that foreign kings “shall minister unto thee”
and that he will one day “suck the milk of the Gentiles”:
And the sons of strangers shall build up thy walls, and their kings
unto thee: for in my wrath I smote thee, but in my favour
have I had mercy on thee.
Therefore thy gates shall be open continually; they shall
not be shut day nor night; that
men may bring unto thee the forces of the Gentiles, and that
their kings may be brought.
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee
shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.
Thou shalt also
suck the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou
that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.
Isaiah 60: 10-12,
16; emphasis added.
this promise, throughout history the Jews have tried to appropriate much of the wealth and the power of the
world. Unsurprisingly they came into continuous conflict with the whole world as a result.
They have been expelled
from several countries more than a hundred times. Instead
of readjusting their behavior, the Jews developed a
persecution complex : the
whole world is against them “for no reason”. Because it was mostly European
countries that expelled them, the Jews came to consider Europeans as their greatest enemies.
After WWII and the intense Holocaust
propaganda it brought in its wake — see Norman Finkelstein’s
The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering — the organized Jewish community
became convinced that Europeans were a threat to them as a race and that they should therefore be neutralized
as a race; in other words, that GENOCIDE of the European people, now
better known as “White genocide”, would be the
solution” to the European problem.
But how could a small ethnic group of only 15 million people like the Jews
exterminate ONE BILLION people of European
descent spread out all over the world
? The Jews came to the conclusion that it would be possible to neutralize Europeans
racially, not by physically exterminating them, but by causing them to mix with other races, thus losing their racial
characteristics for good. Mulattoes, Mestizos and Eurasians are no more Europeans, and the
Jews believe such people
can be more easily manipulated by them than full-blood
Europeans. Thus after the second World War the Jews
concocted a plan to
create conditions that would lead on a mass scale to miscegenation and the interbreeding of Europeans
with other races. The effective means of achieving this would be through non-white immigration
white countries. This is a “soft” genocide, “soft”
because no killing or violence is involved.
— § —
Jews decided to commit a “soft” genocide on Europeans. There are 4 things necessary to make such an
endeavor a success : (1) lowering the white birthrate; (2) opening all white countries to
mass non-white immigration; (3) neutralizing the opposition; (4) promoting miscegenation.
Lowering the white
the birthrate of Europeans is 1.6 children per woman. That is below the 2,1 necessary for replacement.
This cannot be blamed on the Jews, but is a correlate of economical development. Developed East Asian countries
similar low birthrate.
There are however a number of activities that tend to lower the birthrate
even further. Jews are prominent in all these
activities, which are: the promotion
of transgenderism, homosexuality, pornography, promiscuity, birth control,
and feminism. Feminism is the greatest additional contributor to the low birthrate of Europeans and Jews are disproportionally
dominant in this movement. (see List of Jewish feminists)
Opening all white countries to mass non-white immigration
European countries were never meant to be immigration countries, and the traditional
immigration countries such as
the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina
also, until recently accepted only European immigrants. That
has changed dramatically
since the mid 1960s and many white countries receive now more non-white than white immigrants.
They are expected to become majority non-white within a few decades. The name “Muhammad” is now the
name for newly born boys in many big cities of Western Europe. It
can be demonstrated
that in all cases Jewish lobbying was behind this change
in immigration policies.
(See extensive endnote, with numerous links, on Jewish influence in shaping
immigration policy in the US, Canada, Australia, Britain, Sweden and Ireland).
The recent “refugee” crisis, as is becoming increasingly clear to many who were unaware of this fact
before, is also of
Jewish making. The destruction of Libya and the attempt to
destroy Syria happened all according to the Oded Yinon Plan,
an Israeli plan
to weaken all Muslim countries from Morocco to Pakistan, in order to facilitate Israel’s regional hegemony.
All those “Syrian refugees” (80% of whom are neither Syrian nor refugees), are
directed – not to the rich Arabian Gulf
states, let alone to Israel –
but to Europe and other white countries. Jewish organizations, the ubiquitous
Soros, and even an Israeli “humanitarian” organization called IsraAid are heavily involved.
Neutralizing the opposition
Since the Jewish plan to flood all white countries
with non-white immigrants has been such a smashing success, the
Jews and their
lackeys need to prevent the indigenous Whites from resisting their acute
dispossession and they resort to various means to neutralize the opposition.
Following are the means they use : (1) argumentation, (2) prohibition,
(3) discrimination, (4) denigration, (5) racial disnormativation.
Arguments in favor of mass non-white immigration are of economical, cultural and moral kinds.
Immigration from the Third World is allegedly necessary for work the indigenous workers refuse to do, for the payment
of pensions, for care of the elderly or for filling the gaps of a growing economy. These
arguments are all bogus. Any
society develops an economy commensurate with its
own size, therefore it can by definition supply a workforce
sufficient for its
needs. Third World immigration, it is alleged, would also be culturally enriching. In reality the bulk
of immigrants have low education, are hostile to their new country and concentrate in ghettos without integrating.
Accepting refugees from the Third World would be a “moral obligation”
even though such refugees
could be temporally housed in camps within their own
region and repatriated after the crisis is over.
If “positive” arguments fail, then objectors to immigration always
can be accused of “racism”, as if not every ethnic group
ethnic rights, among which is the right to remain the majority in its own
The accusation of “racism” is the strongest weapon in this battle.
(2) Prohibition: Criticism of
the presence or (mis)behavior of immigrants is severely punished by Orwellian “Human Rights
Commissions”, “Racial Equality Commissions”, “Anti-Discrimination Commissions” etc.
that only exist to nip in the bud any
resistance to the agenda of race replacement.
In Sweden even criticism of the government’s immigration policy is now punishable.
(3) Discrimination: Immigrants
and minorities are favoured over Whites when it comes to housing and jobs. They get
Whites don’t get (because they are already “privileged”). Since the money for these benefits must come
somewhere Whites are more taxed than non-Whites, making the formation of
a family more difficult for them, while non-Whites can afford bigger families.
Thus Whites have to toil for their bare existence and in the process work for their own
(4) Denigration: To demoralize the indigenous population, its history is denied, its heroes
denigrated and its culture
declared as without value. National symbols such as
flags are forbidden because they would be “offensive”
Christian symbols are not allowed because they would be “offensive” to Muslims.
(5) Racial disnormativation: You
will not find the word “disnormativation” in a dictionary, because I have myself invented
it. I use this term in combination with the adjective “racial” to denote the policy of replacing persons
who are “normative”
for a people of a certain race with people of
a different race, thus causing a sense of alienation. In white countries persons who are normative,
such as anchormen on TV, misses in beautycontests etc., are replaced by people of color, by preference Blacks.
The selection of
Barak Obama as president of the US was in effect such an act of racial disnormativation, orchestrated
by Jews of course. Racial disnormativation has also penetrated the world of films, TV series and commercials.
One would get the impression that at least half of the population consists of Blacks, judging
from their absurd overrepresentation
in the media. This is done on purpose to
demoralize the white population in order to make them accept their dispossession.
Miscegenation cannot be commanded, but it can be promoted.
Depriving Whites of the possibility to be among themselves in terms of residence, study, work and recreation is one thing.
Suggesting miscegenation in films, TV series and commercials is another thing. There is nowadays hardly any form of media
that is not full of this race mixing propaganda, mostly in subliminal form, and it is the Jews who control the media.
“Miscegenation cannot be commanded, but it can be promoted.”
IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
As Illustrated by the 50-minute video below
Following is a video with a collection of scenes
from commercials and films in which the Jewish plan to exterminate
race by “soft” genocide is hidden in suggestive subliminal messages. The real purpose of these productions
is not to sell goods or to entertain, but to promote the inglorious end of the white race
through miscegenation, dispossession and race war.
The commercials sell the ideas of homosexuality, interracial adoption, marriages
between white women and black men
and the production of Mulatto children until
they form the majority. The films sell the ideas of “evil white racism”
of Southerners), the total dispossession of Whites, the surrender to a mass invasion of “refugees”,
race war and murder of “Nazis” by Jews.
In the commercials the idea of homosexual marriage
is sold as a “normal” variety of marriage, first between two white
men and then between a white and a black man. Such couples are then allowed to form a “family”, first by adopting
children of their own race, and then by adopting interracially. This is a combination
of three Jewish
agendas : 1) degrading normal marriage, 2) promoting sterility
of Whites, 3) promoting race mixing.
The major part of the commercials is about the subliminal promotion of marriages
between white women and black men and the production of Mulatto children.
in race form a formidable obstacle to marriage. That can only be overcome by creating a very
strong attraction. Men are mainly attracted by the beauty and loveliness of women. White men don’t find
black women particularly attractive, therefore the Jews have concentrated their
efforts on white women.
Women are not in the first place attracted by the handsomeness of men, but by their strength and competence. There
are sound biological reasons for this fact. In order to give birth to children and raise
them, women need men who
can protect them and provide for them. A woman therefore
seeks a protector and a provider in a man, so if a man of
another race seems
to be stronger and more competent than a man of her own race, a woman is inclined to go
for that man of the other race.
And so it is that White woman are being brainwashed, day after day by the mass media,
into finding black men far stronger and more sexually dynamic than the men of their
The Jews understand this and in the numerous commercials and
films they produce they always depict the
white man as cowardly,
weak, foolish, stupid and boring in contrast to the black man who is depicted as strong,
masculine, intelligent, fascinating. The white woman then goes for the black man, eventually marries him
and produces mulatto children — by which the “soft”
genocide of the white race is inexorably achieved.
Following are the recurrent themes in the mass media, which the video
below will help to illustrate:
1. White men are weak
Examples : A clumsy white man always types with caps but can’t
help himself. A clumsy white worker nearly hits his
own feet with a drill. A
weak feminized white man is scolded by his wife for being a total loser. A white man poses for a
group photo with blacks. The black photographer gestures him to step back a little. The clumsy white man tries
to do that but
falls backwards. All blacks laugh.
2. White men are inferior to blacks
: A big, dominant, successful black man juxtaposed to a weak looking white man. A black stern looking
highway patrol officer follows a smallish white man, driving incorrectly. A black woman lectures high-handedly
hites about the need for a lawyer in tricky situations. A well dressed
black gentleman sitting in
an easy-chair in the lounge of a hotel, has his shoes
polished by a submissive white man.
3. A white woman choses a superior black man over an inferior white man
: A white man and a black man go to a restaurant. The clumsy white man doesn’t know what to order (he
is “incompetent”). The black man knows exactly what to order (he is “competent”).
The white waitress is charmed
by the competent black man. She says :”That’s
hot”. The white man asks : “What’s hot,
the chilli or the chicken?”
The waitress indicates that it’s the black man that is “hot”.
4. A white woman is married to
a black man
Examples : A black man is sitting in a romantic pose with his white wife on a bed. They eat white cream.
A song sounds in which the words love, joy, and happiness occur. Everything is
sweet and romantic.
A happy coal-black
bridegroom and his white bride dance in the wood, embrace each other closely, stand in
the surf of the sea, reach with their arms to the sun. Beautiful music sounds. Every thing is sweet and romantic.
black and white couple has a mulatto child
Example : A little mulatto girl discusses the merits of cheerios with
her white mother, while her black father sleeps
on the couch. The mulatto girl
is cute and disarmingly charming. This mixed family is depicted as perfectly normal.
6. The whole family, father, mother
and children consists of mulattoes
Example : The scene of an all-mulatto family. The mother and all four children have
afros. They are presented as the
“typical” American family. Notice
that the Jews, who don’t want Whites to have many children,
a big family. That is because they want the whole white population to become mulatto.
As for the films, Steven Spielberg’s Dream
Works Studios produced films with as theme “evil white racists”
The Help, Lincoln), “bigotted whites” (Meet the Parents, Stepford Wives, Anchorman) and a film about
American president (Deep Impact) to prepare the American public
for what the Jews would later orchestrate in reality.
The Weinstein Brothers are more revengeful in the anti-white themes of their
films. They too produced films with
the “evil white racists” theme
(The Great Debaters, You don’t mess with the Zohan, The Butler, The Equalizer,
Crossing Over) but then went over to the “anti-white revenge” theme (Mandela, Django Unchained,
Inglorious Basterds is no more than
a rather pathetic Jewish revenge fantasy.
all, Jewish commercials and films contain both overt and subliminal anti-white propaganda, with a thinly
disguised wish to cause a “soft” white genocide by mixing Whites with Blacks
or other races. The end result
is mongrelization or a race of
half breeds. Whites have already begun to die out and disappear from our traditional white homelands,
as you can see from the picture below:
Click on this text to hear exactly Who Is Pushing for Mass Refugee Migration? "Jewish Organizations of All Kinds, THAT'S WHO"...
SINISTER JEWISH CABAL BEHIND RACE-MIXING COMMERCIALS
Ethnic-Europeans, who make up 95% of the smallest continent, are baffled by the sinister anti-White propaganda
displayed in commercial advertising. Propaganda promoting mixed-race
relationships, particularly white women
with black men, has become
so general, even the least observant have begun to notice.
Based on small glimpses of marketing sub-culture,
one might assume half or more of all relationships involve some sort
of race-mixing. The combination of white women with black men is the most common mixed-race couple depicted in race-hate
If race diversity advertising was truly about appealing to
the greatest number of customers or potential customers, it
an odd strategy to focus so much on one combination, while ignoring so many others.
This suggests a sinister and subliminal purpose behind the race mixing trend.
THE MIXED RACE IDEAL IS A LIE
Research reveals that ethnic-Europeans
are the least likely to marry outside of their race. Mixed race relationships
provably flawed. In terms of combined average incomes of interracial marriages, black husbands with white wives
earned the lowest amount of any other combination. The black husband and white wife
combination were also the least educated.
Of the interracial combinations, marriages
between whites and blacks were found to be the least stable, and the most
to result in divorce. The divorce rate is higher in all interracial marriages for white women relative
to a white marriage.
A study of over two million online dating interactions revealed
distinct racial preferences between groups. White
women are strongly
against race-mixing, they respond most frequently to white men and least frequently to black men.
In light of this data, it is all the more bizarre that the combination of a white woman
with a black man is seen so frequently in advertising.
RACE BASTARDISATION HAS PROVED TO BE A CATACLYSMIC FAILURE
transmitted disease rates per the 2016 Centre for Disease Control speak for themselves. A
examined the outcomes of women that have children with
black men, the results were staggering. Currently, 70% of
children are born out of wedlock; however, when the mother is white and the father black, the rate jumps to 97%.
98% of white mothers studied reported the father does not support their children financially,
97% report the father is not
in the child’s life, and 97%
of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children. Only 10%
of women that have children with black men out of wedlock end up marrying. The vast majority of white women
children withblack men live far below the poverty line.
Partner violence is classified as threats, physical, or emotional violence between two people in a committed
The National Centre for Injury Prevention and Control
estimates that relationship
violence costs around $4.1 billion a
year in medical and mental health care costs.
IDENTIFYING WHITE SUCKERS
Idealistic youth lacks discernment; the
younger the cohort, the more likely they were to say the increase of interracial
marriage is for the better. Liberals were more likely than conservatives to say interracial marriages
are for the better. College graduates were also more likely to support the same fanciful
A noted researcher says that after a considerable amount of
spent time in academia he concludes that the longer one
academia, the more apt one is to be indoctrinated by critical theory. There is likely also a self-selection bias
at work as well. Those who are more likely to buy into the narrative of critical theory
are more likely to thrive in an
environment that echoes their sentiments.
Pew Research 2010 found that 69% of people surveyed said that single women having children is a bad thing,
unmarried couples raising children is a bad thing, yet hypocritically
only 14% say interracial marriage is a bad thing. There
particularly dumb about being in favour of interracial relationships, while at the same time conceding the self-destructive
outcomes of those relationships.
Research reveals that whites are the least likely to marry outside of their race. When
white women marry outside of their r
ace they are more likely to
be abused, to become single-mothers, live in poverty, and that whites dating
of their race exposes us to a higher chance of contracting a sexually transmitted disease.
We know that despite fashionable acceptance, white people continue to show a natural
disgust response to interracial
relationships. We also know that
despite the tsunami of diversity propaganda in films, television,
in advertisements, same-race couples are still the most common relationships, by far.
MALICE BEHIND RACE-MIXING PROPAGANDA
that interracial advertising under the guise of “diversity” is about selling clothes or laundry detergent or
The real purpose of mixed race advertising is to present
a distorted worldview, to humiliate, to mock whites, and to make complacent.
White men are the last vanguard against the intrigues of an ethnic group who historically hate Europeans.
are displayed with non-white men not to sell items but
as a tactic of psychological warfare against European culture and civilisation.
White men are rarely portrayed in a favourable light; they
are often the overweight,
goofy, clumsy, half-wit that relies on
women and non-whites to save the day.
From films to television to advertisements, this is an increasingly common anti-white falsehood. The outcomes
and individually undesirable, little if any good comes
from promoting white women to date and
marry outside of their race.
What we are seeing is a systemic attack on white identity.
The psychological effects of advertising are well-documented. Advertising has the ability
make people chose an inferior product simply by manipulating
the affective conditioning.
suggest the average American is exposed to as many as 5,000 advertisements in a day. The power of advertising
has the power to condition us to be more accepting of social change. The prevalence
of mixed-race couples and an increase
of LGBT representation have
in no small way changed social attitudes. Although intuitive reactions of disgust
remain, outward social attitudes have become accepting of all forms of degeneracy and social decay.
BLACKS AGAINST WHITES
These images have an effect on black men as well. Blacks are constantly being told by
the film industry, TV, and advertising,
that dating white women
is natural and are falsely led to believe that white women prefer black men to white partners.
Faced by reality, the distaste towards blacks by white women, causes resentment which leads to rape, violence
racist humiliation of white women.
Nearly 100% of interracial rapes are white
women being raped by non-white men (National Crime Victimization Survey,
2008, Table 42). These advertising images, which have no small part in
not only promote a dysgenic society, they place
Whites in a grave danger.
THE SINISTER HAND BEHIND WHITE GENOCIDE
belligerent example of anti-white propaganda came from Netflix via a set of three commercials for the company.
The series of the three Netflix commercials is titled The Couple, which
features a white woman and a black man.
commercial “Open Relationship” depicts two couples, an interracial couple, and a white couple. The white
man is depicted as small, weak, insecure, “non-progressive,” and closed-minded.
His white girlfriend quickly decides
to cast him aside to spend
the evening with the interracial couple, as the black
literally steals the man’s girlfriend in front of him, humiliating him.
HLG Studios out of Los Angeles was behind
the production of the three creepy commercials. The advertising company
has worked on campaigns for a myriad of national brands, from fast food chains to banks, technology companies, and
clothing retailers. HLG Studios was founded by Yuri Baranovsky, the same carpetbagger
who directed Netflix’s race-mixing,
pieces. Yuri Baranovsky is Jewish, an ethnic group that is vehemently opposed to Jews forming
relationships outside their own ethnic group.
Just four Jewish owned mega-corporations control the vast majority of all advertising agencies. The Omnicom
of New York, WPP of London, Publicis of Paris, and Interpublic
of New York are the key corporations in the West.
York Times states that these companies are so powerful “they can indirectly set network television schedules
and starve magazines to death or help them to flourish,” by
deciding how and when to spend advertising dollars.
owns dozens if not hundreds of smaller agencies; Omnicom has bought over 150 firms alone.
Globalist CEO John Wren currently heads
Omnicom Group. Omnicom was founded by Allen Rosenshine, Keith Reinhard,
John Bernbach, all three are Jewish and promote the exclusivity of Jews ~ but work hard to destroy ethnic-European ethnicity.
Long-standing CEO of Publicis (1987–2017)
has been Maurice Lévy, who cited his rabbi grandfather as his greatest
inspiration. Lévy has been honoured by the Anti-Defamation League, for his work fighting
anti-Semitism, and his relentless promotion of “diversity”.
WPP of London was founded and is currently run by Martin Sorrell,
who is a Jew. Chairman and CEO of the Interpublic
Group (IPG), is
Michael Isor Roth. Roth condemned the “white supremacist ideology” at Charlottesville as he wrote in an internal
creepy-weepy memo to 50,000 IPG employees.
There is clearly a disproportionate number of Jews and those
with Jewish sympathies involved in mass media advertising.
small start-up firms to multi-billion-dollar corporations, all of which are promoting
hostile anti-white falsehoods, while praising “diversity” and “inclusion.”
If you wanted to destroy a civilization,
how would you go about it? If you wanted to create a dysfunctional and impotent
society, what would be your weapon? What better way to destroy the white family than to encourage white
especially white women, to mate with foreign men unlikely
to support them or raise their children.
If you wanted to create a chaotic society that is easy to lord over, you would ensure that the children are
raised by and
are dependent upon the state whilst the menfolk are
marginalised and seen as social pariahs by their own people. What
better way to destroy a people than to promote a relationship that can never produce white children and that is by
nature race destructive? It is carefully calculated ethnic-European genocide fuelled
by Jewish hatred for Christian Europeans.
The media, the press, and advertisers – and businesses that use these race-destroyers have created
a culture of
anti-white hatred. These companies are not merely promoting
racial bastardisation and trying to appeal to a wider
range of consumers,
they are promoting the increased abuse and sexual degradation of white women.
iniquitous advertising corporations are not selling products, which they anyway fail to move from the store shelves.
Great department stores like House of Fraser, Debenhams and similar, who used these Jewish
controlled products, are
falling like flies. These once great companies
simply do not have non-Jewish marketing agencies; they are victims of Jewish monopoly too.
The race-destroyers purpose is to recreate a nation without
ethnic-Europeans. Race mixing propaganda says bluntly
children are not wanted in the New Order and White men have no place in the globalists’ nightmarish world.
THERE AN ANTIDOTE
How can ethnic-Europeans challenge the Jewish War against ethnic-Europeans? An expert
writes, “Every single time I
come across an advertisement that
highlights “diversity” in an absurd way or promotes
miscegenation, I make a point to share it online and with my friends and family.
I personally take note of companies that insist on promoting
miscegenation and do not
spend my money with them. If they want
the “diverse” consumer, they can have them.
future of civilization, the future for our people, is only being offered by one group of people, and that is us. We are
in many ways the last vanguard against a system that would greatly prefer our extinction.
Every film that has a hostile
anti-white message should be reviewed,
critiqued, and dissected by those writing articles and creating podcasts.
Ethnic-Europeans have the intellectual ability to develop their
own critiques, to be warriors against this cultural insurrection,
to let anti-white Jewish racists know a worldwide Christian boycott against mix race advertising will destroy their
malicious miscegenation strategy. The message is, refuse to purchase goods from any company
that uses racist advertising to
promote race bastardisation.
The belief that
“immigrants with college degrees” are bringing great skills to the US is completely false, as
U.S.-degree holders out-score foreign-educated immigrants by a wide margin, according
to literacy, numeracy,
and computer operations administered by
the Program for International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC).
(The New Observer)
detailed in a new report produced by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), while the “percentage of immigrants
who arrive with a college or advanced degree has risen over the past decade, the extent to which
foreign education translates into useful skills here in the United States is an open question.”
Based on English-language
tests of literacy, numeracy, and computer operations administered by the Program for
Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), the CIS study found that “among test-takers with
at least a college education, U.S.-degree holders out-score foreign-educated immigrants by a wide margin.”
For example, among
those with at least a college degree, native-born Americans score at the 74th percentile on literacy,
while U.S.-educated immigrants score at the 66th percentile, and foreign-educated immigrants score at just the
“Policy-makers should therefore be cautious in treating foreign degrees as evidence of ‘high-skill’
immigration,” the report said.
Other key points in the report revealed that:
* Among immigrants in the United States whose highest degree is either
a bachelor’s (“college”) or a master’s or Ph.D.
about 40 percent received their highest degree in a foreign country — meaning they are “foreign-educated”.
* On both literacy
and computer operations, foreign-educated immigrants with a college or advanced
perform so poorly that they score at the level of natives who have only a high school diploma.
* On numeracy, foreign-educated immigrants with
a college or advanced degree perform
closer to the level of natives who have
some college education, but not a bachelor’s.
* Despite their reputation for specializing in “Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics”
(STEM) fields, about one in six foreign-degree
holders score “below basic” in numeracy.
* The skill gap between foreign and U.S. degree holders persists even among
immigrants who have had at least five years in the United States to learn English.ú
The results “explain
why the rising education level of new immigrants has not improved
income, poverty, and welfare use as much as expected,” the report added.
“Policy-makers should be cautious in treating
foreign degrees as evidence of ‘high-skill’ immigration. If legislators are
considering a move towards a merit-based system, they should look beyond educational credentials,” the report
Click on this text to see The Truth About 'Refugees'...
We (at TOMATO BUBBLE) recently stumbled across an item which
we found so profoundly
we initially suspected it to be a hoax for the simple
reason that it was just a
bit too "in
your face" to be true. But alas, because the hour of "their" final triumph approaches
so rapidly and so unimpeded, "they" evidently believe that
there is no longer anything to fear
about such blatant in-your-faceness as what we are about to present. We are sorry to have
to say that the following story of the Paris White Genocide mural,
and its creator's background
and connections, is indeed
OF THE IMAGERY BELOW, THOUGH CARTOONISH IN NATURE, IS OBSCENE AND VIOLENT
A giant mural painting on the floor below Paris' iconic Eiffel Tower was completed
of 2016 by a Los Angeles-based artist
named Cleon Peterson. The bizarre "work of art" is titled,
"Endless Sleep" -- an obvious reference to the coming "endless sleep"
of the White Race. There
really no need for us to interpret the meaning of Peterson's obscenity. To all but the most brain-dead
libtard, the massive 500 square-meter image, best viewed from
the top of the Eiffel Tower while looking
down, speaks for itself.
Have a look:
1. Cleon Peterson
2 & 3: Black figures are superimposed over the White characters,
as a Black male and White female embrace
passionately in the center.
The linked arms of the Blacks form a 6-pointed Star of David.
The Star of David at the center is an obvious tribute to the terrible
Tribe that is behind White Genocide
and to the House of Rothschild in particular. But don't take our word for it. Here it is, from a tweet,
from Peterson himself:
an "ex" heroine addict, tweeted out his gratitude to French banking couple Benjamin
and Ariane de Rothschild.
We suspect (though we have no solid evidence to present) that the "gratitude" is
related to Peterson
(with 10 helpers)
having been commissioned to paint the disgusting White Genocide mural.
Should there be any remaining doubt as to
what the Eiffel Tower floor mural truly symbolizes, a review of the self-loathing artist's
earlier works -- depicting what he refers to as "the
hedonistic triumphs of those
who recognize themselves as victorious in the
unfolding mirror of history" -- clearly confirms what Peterson
and the Rothschilds are dreaming about. Be forewarned, these images
are obscene and unsettling.
DON'T SAY WE DIDN'T WARN YOU!
-- and don't send us nasty E-mails for publishing them.
Before hooking up with the Rothschilds
and painting Paris, Peterson was known for churning out scenes of torture,
rape and mass murder of White people at the hands of
Blacks --- a perfect hireling for the Rothschilds!
Plenty more such as this.
In his 1925 book
'Praktischer Idealismus', the half-Austrian / half-Japanese Globalist Count
Richard Coundehove Kalergi
boldly declared that the citizens of the future "United States of
Europe" will not be White people anymore.
In his own words, the man who is today regarded as one of the founders
of "modern Europe" revealed the game:
"The man of the future will be of mixed race. The
races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination
of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of
the future, similar in appearance
to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with the diversity of
Of course, Kalergi's chosenite paymasters will not be replaced or
blended out by this
"Eurasian-negroid race of the future".
Wrote the hired hack of his beloved Rothschild bosses:
"Instead of destroying
European Judaism, Europe, against her
will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future
a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not
surprising that the people that escaped from the
Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe.
Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed
of aristocrats. This happened when the European
feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews."
The artistic abomination at the
Eiffel Tower is "The Kalergi Plan" --- in paint. The end game is upon us, and for those who
think that the final stages of genocide will be manifested by
a peaceful and gradual blending-out of the last remaining non-elite
White Europeans, Peterson's previous paintings, and Rothschild's evident affinity
for them, ought to dispel that delusion once and for all.
Kalergi, writing on behalf of Rothschild
& Friends, foresaw the current Turd World invasion of Europe.
If they have their way, the end to an aging and morally
decadent White Europe will come violently for many.
Mass Killing White People is
the #1 Priority of the Rothschild Family
Last September, an artist was hired by the French government to create a giant mural beneath the Eiffel Tower. The artwork
took approximately 300 hours
of work and was accomplished through the dedication of 10 painters – the artist? Cleon Peterson.
Peterson is an
artist from Los Angelos whose paintings are said to symbolise a “struggle between power and submission
in the fluctuating architecture of contemporary society.” Below is a picture of the mural as seen from above
via digital medium:
“Endless Sleep,” a painting that rests beneath the Eiffel Tower
as of September 2016.
Upon initial inspection, it is entirely possible to interpret Peterson’s artwork as a representation
of overcoming racism, with black and
white figures holding the
hands of their respective fellows and dancing together around a monochrome couple. But there are a few
disturbing hang-ups. For example, the shape itself is akin to the Star of David. The black figures
are holding hands over the genitalia
of each white figure. The
couple in the middle wrapped in a romantic embraced appear to be the source of the dancing figures’ joy. But
is this celebration concerned with overcoming racism, or rejoicing over the
abolition of native Europeans? Other artwork produced by
has more blatant overtones, and through surveying the context of Peterson’s artistic vision, one can easily understand
the above mural is intended to convey.
“The Hanging Tree,” (2015).
In “The Hanging Tree,”
we witness similar racial tension between the black and white figures, with three of the black figures admiring
the result of their handiwork: the lynching of a white man.
Meanwhile, two black figures club – or slice, the precise nature of their
weapons are dubious – two white figures to death. There are numerous other paintings
by Peterson that depict similar and worse
scenarios. Including the desecration of the Statue of Liberty, rape, and
the portrayal of white figures as degenerate, self-harming individuals.
Interestingly, Peterson has created such violent artwork without bringing racial
tensions to the forefront of its meaning (there is
plenty of black-on-black violence artwork, for example). But out of all his projects, the white figures are never depicted as violent or
particularly dangerous. The Occidental Observer has noted that even in all-white paintings, they are
depicted as a people incapable of thinking for themselves, doomed to a life of drunkenness and stupidity.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of Peterson’s work is that he was commissioned to paint a boat for a company
Benjamin de Rothschild in 2001
(the company is called Gitana). The boat was named after Edmund de Rothschild and is called
Gitana 17 for short, skippered by Sebastian Josse. According to the Rothschild Archive, the Rothschild family has nearly always had
a passion for yachts and sailing beginning early in the 19th century. Today, Peterson’s
racially motivated artwork is being incorporated
by the Rothschilds into their love for sailing, conveying a nod towards Peterson’s artistic representation of
a racially motivated violent dystopia.
Peterson has claimed that “the world and people’s motives are exceedingly complex and what seems heroic and just on one side is
often the opposite on the other,” inferring that he empathises
with violent extremist ideologies. In an interview, he expressed a belief
race situation… is a subject that’s totally neglected and not confronted at all. We do things on a surface
level… racism today
has become systemic
and deeply rooted within economics and politics and housing developments and the jail system. There’s so many
layers of unfairness, and you see how shit boils up.”
Peterson has also professed to consider his work to have a timeless quality, saying
that his artwork is not “nailed down in time” and that it could be depicting
revolution from hundreds of years
ago, today, or, as it is inferred, in the future.
These grotesque black-and-white
paintings by Peterson are inherently prophetic,
and the mural beneath the Eiffel Tower celebrates the dissolution of native Europeans
either through violent domination or mass immigration.
As Peterson has been funded
by a Rothschild organization, his artwork now depicts a scene that the most powerful
family in the world seeks to make a reality: control. Peterson’s
work is about domination
abolition, brutally dismantling the existence of white figures. Titling his painting
with labels such as “Justice” and Vengeance,” Peterson is seeking
to convey a
towards what could be a racially motivated war on the horizon.
Click on this text to see how Israel is Directly Helping Muslims And Africans Invade Europe...
Click on this text to hear ROTHSCHILD GENOCIDE: INNOVATING THE POPULATION TO ZERO -- with Deborah Tavares...
THE 'ABDICATION' OF THE WHITE
By Mike King
This isn't about hating other races. It's
about saving European Man from deliberate destruction!
Political puppets generally have
a personal buffer between themselves and the big masters. Woodrow Wilson had Edward Mandell House; FDR
had Henry Morgenthau; Barack Obama has Valerie Jarrett.
For Winston Churchill, the personal handler, and a probable
homosexual lover (here), was Frederick A. Lindemann a physicist whose German-Jewish
family arrived in England when he was about 14 years old. He was known to friends as "the Prof"
in reference to his position at the University of Oxford, and as "Baron Berlin" to his many
detractors because of his German accent and haughty aristocratic manner.
Lindemann believed that a small circle
of elites should run the world, resulting in a stable society, "led by supermen and served by
helots." He believes that science can yield a race of humans blessed with
“the mental makeup of the worker bee.”
In Lindemann's Jewish supremacist worldview, the "worker bees" would
be mixed race and the "supermen" would no doubt be the Zionist elite. Naturally, before this New World
Order can emerge, the 'White Man' would have to first "abdicate"
his leading position on Europe and America.
excerpt from 'The Prof' --one of the many the biogarphies written about Lindemann:
“Professor Frederick Lindemann,
the Chief Advisor to Winston Churchill and the inspiration and architect of the air crucifixion of Germany
was in a reflective mood after the war. Toward
the end of his life, Lindemann made a remark on more than one occasion with such an air of seriousness
that he seemed to regard it as his testament of wisdom, and I accordingly feel it incumbent upon me
to record it here, although not.in.perfect.sympathy with it.
'Do you know,' he asked, 'what the future historians will regard as the most important event of this age?’
‘Well, what is it?’
will not be Hitler and the Second World War; it will not be the release of nuclear energy; it will not
be the menace of Communism.'
These negatives seemed very comprehensive. He
put on an expression of extreme severity and turned down the corners of his lips: ‘It
will be the abdication of the White man.’ Then
he nodded his head up and down several times to drive home his proposition."
* The Prof’ -- R.F Harrod, McMillan, 1959. Page 261/2. A Personal Memoir
Lindemann was the true architect
of the Dresden Holocaust of innocent Germans. --- all part of the "abdication" of "The
White Man" to his Tribe.
Understand Professor Lindemann
-- and you will understand the higher purpose behind the "politically correct" madness of "diversity"
that is sweeping away European Man and European culture.
White Man! The Masters of the New World Order, having already obtained your
"abdication". They are now targeting you for final elimination
in so many little ways that you may not have noticed - as illustrated below.
France 1994 --- France 2006
Europe's National Football teams have abdicated
The $1 Dollar Coin has
Captain America has
"abdicated" to diversity.
has "abdicated" to diversity.
home of Asgard has "abdicated"
to diversity (Heimdall the Gatekeeper).
Little Orphan Annie
has "abdicated" to diversity.
The Morning Show 'Live'
to diversity. (Regis was immensely popular when he was suddenly fired!)
Game-Show 'Family Fued' has "abdicated" to diversity.
The Game-Show 'Let's Make
a Deal' has "abdicated"
NBC Nightly News
* Lyin' Brian Williams was forced out due to a suddenly discovered "scandal."
|James Bond is under
growing pressure to "abdicate"
to diversity. (here)
School System has "abdicated" to diversity.
TV Court Shows have "abdicated"
The Super Bowl Half-time Show has
to diversity (and degeneracy).
have "abdicated" to diversity.
Ms. America Pageants
have "abdicated" to diversity
(Despite being a small fraction
of the general population at large, and a tiny fraction of the overall contestant population; 8 Black
women and 1 Indian-American woman have been crowned winner since 1984).
Bavarian Folk Music &
Dance has "abdicated"
System has "abdicated" to diversity.
The NBA (National Basketball
Association) has "abdicated"
to diversity. (Why no European-American night?)
The $20 Bill has
"abdicated" to diversity (new bills due
out in 2020).
The culprits behind the "abdication" have been named -- straight from
the horse's own mouth:
"The transformation (to multi-culturalism) must take place. Europe is not going to
be the monolithic society that it once was in the last century. Jews are going to be
at the center of that. Its a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going
into a multi cultural mode and Jews are going to be resented because of our leading role. But
without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive." (here)
- Barbara Lerner Specter
Specter's "migrant" friends are fueling an epidemic of violence
and rape in formerly peaceful Sweden; an emasculated nation of only 10,000,000 with a birth
rate below replacement and 100,000 virile, fertile immigrants pouring in each year.
STOP THE HATE!
by the Jewish-controlled media, mentally diseased and suicidal White libtards, wearing "So Sorry"
T Shirts, chain themselves and beg for Blacks to forgive them for slavery (a trade which was
actually controlled by Jewish merchants).
WAKE A FRIEND! SHARE THIS PIECE!
Geographic now owned by Jews has a cover showing a glaring example of miscegenation of whites in Europe which has been banned
by facebook. When viewing the picture, keep in mind the following "A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century"
by communist Jew, Israel Cohen written in 1912 and read into the Congressional Record in 1957. Don't ever forget that it's
the Jews vs us and whomever wins will determine the fate of the other side.
"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is
racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites,
we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro
minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.
We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment.
With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America
to our cause."
.....Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for he Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559,
June 7, 1957
THE JEW'S WHITE GENOCIDE PROJECT STARTING
"Hooten Plan" to Genocide the Germans:
1943, prominent American anthropologist Ernest Hooton wrote
an an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” for New York Daily newspaper. The concept was an “outbreeding”
plan to “destroy German nationalism and ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and
sociological capacities.” ....(Earnest Albert Hooton (November
20, 1887 – May 3, 1954) was a Jewish-American physical anthropologist known for his work on racial classification and his popular writings such as the book Up From The Ape. Hooton sat
on the Committee on the Negro, a group that "focused on the anatomy of blacks and reflected the racism of the time).
The Harvard University professor’s proposal called
for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought
into the country in large numbers; and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to 12
million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild
of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization
of German ‘aggressiveness’ by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”
This scheme, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to
be implemented. “During this period, it would encourage the immigration and settlement in Germany of non-German nationals,
especially males,” he wrote.
aspects of the 1943 plan were delayed, in the decades since the end of World War II something of the spirit of the genocidal
Hooton plan is being unleashed on Germany’s population. In actuality, it was jump started given that an estimated
five million or more German POWs (see Rhine-Meadows death camps) and civilians were exterminated and murdered in the Hellstorm
period of 1944-1946. This is hidden history.
Now that Germany’s birth rate is below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants are
welcomed as settlers in Germany. The number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural
character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.
Now come official figures from Germany’s Federal Statistics
Office (FSO): One in three German residents under age 18 have foreign roots.
In Berlin, people with a migration background comprise 30% of residents. Ethnic Germans
are already minority in the district center and many of the surrounding central districts.
WHY DO WHITE PEOPLE
HATE WHITE PEOPLE
Anti-White racism is widespread and the
worst offenders are brain-washed self-haters. Ethnic self-loathing is uniquely a White phenomena. Peoples across the
world are baffled by the perversity of ethnic self-loathing and the desire to bring about the destruction of one’s
own ethnicity, culture and history through race-mixing.
Spain currently tops the list of Mediterranean
countries by the number of migrant sea arrivals. Over 47,500 migrants arrived in the country since the
beginning of the year. When illegal migrants reach Spanish soil they are not arrested and shipped back. No, they
cavort as they celebrate on the red carpet laid out for them. Without need for identity non-Europeans immediately benefit
from resident status and free access to taxpayers purse and pocket.
Very few are refugees
in the accepted sense of the term: they are economic migrants. Yet, ethnic-Europeans who share the culture, religion, and
history of Europe are made to jump through hoops to acquire residency in EU countries without guarantee of success. Is this
Not all Africans are Black: Hundreds of thousands of ethnic-Europeans
endure a squalid soul-destroying existence scattered across the black republic’s hundreds of South African squatter
camps whilst awaiting government-sponsored race genocide. There is no possibility of their being accepted in Europe. There
are no BBC or CNN camera crews to record the misery of these displaced Whites.
A Ukrainian orphaned
by her parents’ death in a car accident was adopted by a comfortably off professional English couple. The teenager
was happy in England, was schooled and befriended there, but was sent back to her country where she has no family.
Yet, when illegal immigrants, after being convicted of multiple serious offences, are obliged
to return to their native countries protests erupt and airliners are occupied and prevented from leaving. Is this not racism?
The British Home Office says ‘it cannot be satisfied’ that Inga Lockington, a former
mayor of Ipswich and town councillor is permanently resident in England. She has lived and worked in the UK since 1979.
Is this not anti-White racism when set against
the hundreds of thousands of unidentifiable benefit-bandits granted citizenship and passports despite lacking skills, shared
culture or self-sufficiency?
Daily the immigrants parade along highways built by impoverished
White road workers. They use schools built by the generations who gave their lives for Britain, they live in homes not built
by their own kind but by the Whites they despise.
The son of a former British High Commissioner
was denied a UK passport as he was born in a Caribbean state where his father served as British High Commissioner to Trinidad
and Tobago from 2011 to 2014.
The former diplomat said he was left feeling “powerless
and nervous” after the Home Office refused to grant his new-born son a passport. He said it illustrated a “cultural
(ethnic) priority within the Home Office to reject wherever possible”.
Why do ethnic-Europeans already living in Europe find it almost impossible to take up residency
in other EU nations? Such anti-White racism is institutionalised apartheid for which the haters responsible will one day
be held accountable and hopefully exiled. The lowest form of race hater is the self-loathing hater. If these race-haters
love migrants so much then they and their hapless families are welcome to join migrants and so they will.
Even those whose original European forebears emigrated are denied residency in the motherlands. Britons whose parents
emigrated to the Dominions are sent from the UK back to Australia, New Zealand, and Canada? Yet, 2.3 billion Commonwealth
citizens, 94% of whom are African or Asian, are encouraged to take out British citizenship by filling the gaps in Britain’s
Simon Milne MBE, 58, served in
Northern Ireland and Bosnia and is one of 27 Gentlemen at Arms who guard the Queen on royal occasions. His wife and mother
of his children, Francoise, 50, applied for residency but was refused as she could not prove she was ‘self-sufficient’.
A Dutch and Spanish couple who have lived in Britain all their adult lives have told of their
“devastation” after the Home Office refused their post-referendum application to have their two London-born children
recognised as permanent residents of the country.
Jan-Dinant Schreuder and Monica Obiols, both 49,
found themselves in a bureaucratic nightmare when they were told their 15-year-old son and 12-year-old daughter had to provide
more evidence that they lived permanently with their parents.
evidence are they supposed to have? They don’t have council tax bills or proof of where they live. They are children,”
said Obiols. “They have gone to school here all their life, English is their mother tongue. I was just so shocked
when we got the refusal letters.”
Imagine the furore if such cases as these, and
there are hundreds of them, were applied to non-Whites. If we are going to root out racism what will come out of the
lanced boil will undoubtedly have white skins. To achieve this, a body must be urgently set up to address anti-White racism.
Click on this text to see How America's Borders Were Opened BY THE JEWS...!
Click on this text to see video (before it's deleted from Youtube) of Zio-Jew Bill Kristol freely suggest that what's left
of the "WHITE" working class should be replaced by immigrants ...
Click on this text to watch: Jews Push For White Genocide.....
The white population in the United States has decreased from 79.6
percent in 1980 to 61.9 percent in 2014,
according to a new study
from the University of New Hampshire.
of Latino Americans has risen from 6.4 percent to 17.3 percent over the same time period, while both the African American
and Asian American populations have gone up, the study finds.
The number of non-Hispanic whites who died in 2014 outpaced the number
of white births in 17 U.S. states, representing the largest number of states to experience a natural decrease in the white
population in American history, the study shows.
Researchers at UNH's Carsey School of Public Policy point to an aging white populace,
and a decline in births slowed by the economic recession and by fewer women of childbearing age.
"Decrease is the ultimate demographic
consequence of population aging, low fertility, and a diminishing proportion of the childbearing-age population," researchers
Rogelio Saenz and Kenneth Johnson wrote. "The rapid rise in the number of U.S. states experiencing white decrease reflects
the demographic changes underway."
Nationally, the number of whites born in 2014 is only slightly higher, 2.15 million, than the
number of whites who died, 2.06 million. A decade ago, white births outpaced deaths by nearly 400,000 each year. The ratio
of white births to deaths fell 79 percent between 1999 and 2014.
Members of the baby boom generation, a generation with a greater percentage
of whites than younger generations, are beginning to reach retirement age, and mortality rates are rising. Today, the median
age of a white American is 43, four years higher than it was in 2000. The number of white Americans over the age of 65 has
jumped from 15 percent to 18 percent of the overall white population.
By contrast, the average American Latino is just 28 years old. Latino
birth rates exceeded death rates in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, the researchers find.
Nationally, the number of white Americans
is expected to begin declining in absolute numbers between 2030 and 2040, according to projections from the U.S. Census
Bureau. By 2050, whites are expected to make up less than half the U.S. population.
Whites experienced natural declines mostly in northeastern, eastern
and southern states, according to data from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control
The rapidly aging white population and fast-growing younger minority groups are speeding demographic changes across
the country, hastening a political divide likely to have long-term ramifications, a TheHill news daily report commented.
And there is little
chance that the decreases will reverse since researchers routinely find that once a natural decrease begins, it is unlikely
to reverse itself, said the report, citing more states are likely to join the list of white natural decrease in future years
based on the UNH's study.
The growing ranks of aging baby boomers will weigh heavily on the nation's healthcare costs, as older residents
tend to use more health services. The tug and pull between an aging population that is mostly white and a growing, younger
population that is more diverse is likely to set off years of political fights over spending priorities across the country.
Those fights are
already underway, as Republicans and Democrats pull increasing shares of votes from more defined demographic groups, said
| || |
| || |
Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?
United Nations projections indicate that
over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face
population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will
require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to
Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report
considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of
Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European
Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population
decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.
The following documents are in PDF format. To be able to
view and print pages from these files you will need the Acrobat Reader software. If you do not already
have this plug-in installed on your computer, click here to download it free of charge.
The Press Release
is available in
Jewish people collectively work as
an army of bees. The Christians see one bee and think it is not so dangerous and that it is better to avoid it. What the
Christians can't understand is the danger of the tribe, the group of bees, when they all work together to destroy one enemy.
Jews are the most coward,
but the smartest and most satanic people on earth. It is their nature and it is now a part of
their DNA. The proof is, everywhere in all Western countries of the world, ask any Jew what he thinks about immigration,
even Islamic immigration to the country where he is born; Most Jews favor "Open Societies" because they fear a
homogeneous people who can at any day open their eyes and recognize that there is a bacteria living with them.
It is why the Jews
collectively favor Multicultural, Multi-racial societies where they can hide and be considered as other "minorities"
ruled by the "evil Whites". The Jew needs to hide because he hates the White race and White civilization especially
if it is Christian. The combination of Whiteness and Christianity is a nightmare for the Jew. The religion of Christianity
opposes the core of his Jewish religion based on lies, hatred, subversion, supremacy, envy, violence. The White race as
well, because the Jew knows which people is constructive, productive and altruistic more than other groups. It is why the
Jew promotes systematically and unconsciously any movement and group of people who can weaken the White Christians.
He likes distraction,
he brings those who hate his host so his host will hate those he brings instead of hating him. The Jew is the corrosive power
in every nation, he is the trigger that doesn't want people to have peace, it is why he brings completely different people
and force them to share the same country so they can fight instead of fighting him. This is the description of "Trigger".
This strategy allows him to rule Western people who are busy hating all the races and religions that the Jew forces on them
after preparing these foreigners to hate their host.
The Jew is a coward, he never fight, he always gets
some group to fight for him, then gets other group to fight the group he was using. He is smart because his God is the Devil
according to Christianity and the Devil is smart, he is a fallen angel. It is why the Jew tried for centuries to remove
Christianity from the West, because he knows that if people apply Christianity, then they will ban the Jews from their countries
as it was the case in all Christian empires.
Jews recently admitted that they prefer Islamic Europe over Christian Europe,
because they consider Christianity "impure". A Rabbi even wrote an article celebrating the Islamization of Europe.
They certainly know that Islamization of Europe will lead to the greatest civil war in History, and it will cause the destruction
of his competitors: the Europeans. It is why in the last 6 decades he was siding with the "Muslim rights" in in
NON-WHITE IMMIGRATION IS JEWISH POLICY. 20 Examples, Jewish Hypocrisy & the Effects on Whites ....... https://youtu.be/zC7_7cyqQ0k
Quotations In Support Of White
"There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s
a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states."
– Wesley Clark,
retired General who commanded Operation Allied Force
in the Kosovo War. (Jewish)
of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia
has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would be more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian."
– Miriam Faine, editor of Australian Jewish
The Census Bureau has just reported that
about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We
have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing
the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but
the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible …"
– Earl Raab. Writer, previously Executive Director
of the Jewish Community Relations Council.
of America is heartening news of an almost transcendent quality."
– Ben Wattenberg, Jewish writer and journalist.
Jews had always thrived in nations and empires with multicultural, pluralistic and tolerant environments, while they fared
badly in strong ethnic or nationalistic societies. European Jews have always been the emblematic stranger or ‘other’.
Therefore, by definition, a society where the stranger
is welcome is good for the Jews, although they have not always appreciated this link.
The future of European Jewry is dependant on our
ability to shape a multicultural, pluralistic and diverse society."
– Göran Rosenberg, Jewish author and journalist.
Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are
safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic
groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of US Jews to
endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called social issues."
– Charles Silberman, Jewish writer and journalist
"Some time in the distant future, brown people are probably going to—and I say this
without judgment—breed their way to power in both Europe and America. Arab populations are growing in countries like
France and Holland, and I think we all see where this Mexican thing is going in America.
That’s right, because they fuck more, the
darker skinned people are going to rule the world! And white people, for their own self-preservation, should get a start
on being nice to them now! Nice!
– Bill Maher, Jewish TV host, author and comedian.
Zionists Want Multi Cultural Europe And Jewish Only Israel... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHOvGiF_EC8#t=153
The Decay of Western Civilization .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBXoXB3QvyI
Canada to Be 80% Non-White “Within 100 Years”
Current immigration policies will
turn Vancouver into a 70 percent non-white state within two generations, and all of Canada into an 80 percent nonwhite country
within the next 100 years, one of that country’s foremost diplomats has warned.
Writing in the
Vancouver Sun, former ambassador to Asia and the Middle East Martin Collacott said that current Canadian immigration policy
was “replacing its population” and was a “case of willful ignorance, greed, [and] excess political correctness.”
of London professor Eric Kaufmann, Collacott said that “almost seven out of 10 Vancouver residents will be ‘visible
minorities’ [politically correct Canadian code for nonwhite] within two generations and 80 per cent of the
(compared to 20 per cent today) will be non-white in less than century.”
He went on to write:
notes that, with its continuing high immigration intake and the fact that four out of five newcomers are visible minorities,
Canada is undergoing the fastest rate of ethnic change of any country in the Western world.
Questions must be asked about why such drastic population replacement
is taking place and who is benefiting from it.
While Canada has been helped by large-scale immigration at various times in its history,
the current high intake causes more problems than benefits for our current population.
Our economy grows because of the increasing
population, but the average Canadian gets a smaller piece of the bigger pie.
The cost is huge — with latest estimates indicating taxpayers have
to underwrite recent arrivals to the tune of around $30 billion annually. Young people in large cities such as Vancouver
and Toronto are being crowded out of the housing market by sky-high prices caused largely by the ceaseless flow of new arrivals,
and the quality of life of most residents is negatively affected by increased traffic and commute times, along with congestion
and pressure on the health care and education systems.
Despite this, those who profit from mass immigration continue to laud its
benefits. Their claims are not supported by the facts, however.
are not facing looming labour shortages that we can’t meet with our existing workforce and educational infrastructure.
Immigration, moreover, does not provide a realistic means of dealing with
the costs associated with the aging of our population.
Those who seek to benefit from continued high immigration include leaders of political
parties bent on expanding their political base with policies designed to make it easier to come here from abroad and acquire
the full benefits of citizenship. Also active are leaders of immigrant organizations eager to expand their support base and
important influence has been contributions from developers who want an endless supply of new homebuyers and are major funders
of politicians and parties — particularly at the municipal level.
this regard, it is worth noting that not too long ago, leading politicians in Vancouver on both sides of the political aisle
— such as former mayors Art Phillips and Mike Harcourt — were readily prepared to identify high immigration
intake as one of the leading causes, if not the main cause, of rising house prices. Now, however, no Canadian politician
has the guts or integrity to connect the two.
This is not only because they are so heavily indebted to the real estate industry
in one way or another, but also since criticism of mass immigration is treated in many quarters as xenophobic, if not racist,
since newcomers are overwhelmingly visible minorities.
While a moderate degree of diversity can make society more vibrant —
and my own family is an example of this — it is quite a different matter when it develops to a level where it overwhelms
and largely replaces the existing population, particularly when there is no good reason for allowing this to happen.
With current policies,
we will have to find room for tens of millions of more newcomers, most of whom will settle in the already densely populated
areas of the country where most of the employment opportunities as well as their relatives are located.
We will also have to contend with the fact
that many will bring with them values and traditions that may differ in key respects from those of most Canadians, such
as gender equality and concern for protection of the environment.
If Canada continues along its present path as described by Kaufmann, we
will become one of the first and perhaps the only country in the world to voluntarily allow its population to be largely
replaced by people from elsewhere.
Is this what Canadians want for their
children and their descendants? Almost certainly not.
And yet we are letting it happen through a combination of willful ignorance, political
and financial greed and an excess of political correctness.
Are we prepared to do something about it? Sadly, it appears that most Canadians
are too supine or short-sighted to do so — at least at this juncture.
Canadians deserve a full and informed public debate on the extent to which
immigration policy will determine the future of the country. This should form the basis for a sensible public policy based
on the long-term interests of the existing population, rather than those of special interest groups.
Without this we cannot expect our descendants
to inherit a country that is anything like the Canada of today.
From the Bill of 1965, to the N.W.O. ; there's a scary story to be told. And,
a little known politician behind the American onslaught. more at http://quickfound.net/ "Reviews the history of immigration to the United States up to the restrictive law passed in 1924.
a clip of an interview
with jacob javits.
Immigration and Nationality Act repealed the quota system and set a limit of 20000 immigrants who
could come to the ...
A TDC original documentary explaining the history of immigration
to America, from the "Natives" who first populated the land, ...
By the 1830's, tens of thousands of european immigrants were
arriving on America's eastern shores, coming mostly from England, ...
The Truth About America's Survival | Demographics
and Nationality Act of 1965 was another law passed by the elite without the consent of the people and has
related to Open Immigration Jacob Javits 1965
Interviews with the
author of GIVE ME LIBERTY! AN AMERICAN HISTORY Question: What was the significance of the Immigration ...
Dr. Ngai, Professor
of Asian American Studies and Professor of History at Columbia University, discusses the history of ...
The Jewish pull to
keep our boarders wide open.
sure to be a focal point of the 2016 election, longtime NPR correspondent and 'A Nation of Nations' author Tom ...
President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Immigration Act 50
years ago. Now, immigrant rights are questioned, while in 1965, ...