Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1
Click on this text to examine Holocaust Skepticism a "Beginners Guide to Revisionism"
TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE
BEGIN DEPROGRAMMING HERE:
proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews?
None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors."
is contradictory, and very
few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no
contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds
of ashes, no crematories capable of
disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of
human skin, and
no credible demographic statistics.
2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
Extensive forensic, demographic,
analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates
impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration.
3. Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there
were no extermination camps on German soil"?
Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24,
He also claimed that "gassings" of Jews took place only in Poland.
4. If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination
why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp?
After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown
a building alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely,
but falsely, continues
to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp.
5. What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used
to kill people there?
No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed
to look like a large "gas chamber." After America's leading expert
on gas chamber construction and
design, Fred Leuchter, examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that
it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could
have been, used for executions.
6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was its true purpose?
It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex.
Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce.
7. Who set up the first concentration camps?
During the Boer War (1899-1902),
the British set up what they called "concentration camps"
in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in
these hell-holes, which were as terrible
as German concentration camps of World War II.
8. How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation"
in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII?
The only significant difference was that the Germans interned persons on the
basis of being real
or suspected security threats to the German war effort, whereas the Roosevelt administration interned
the basis of race alone.
9. Why did the German government intern Jews in camps?
It considered Jews a direct threat to national security. (Jews
were overwhelmingly represented
in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks -- not just Jews --
were in danger of internment.
10. What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against
Germany as early as 1933?
In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods.
11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany"?
Yes. Newspapers around the world
reported this. A front-page headline in the London
(March 24, 1933), for example,
announced "Judea Declares War on Germany."
12. Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began?
This was years before the "death
camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942.
13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing?
Britain -- on May 11, 1940.
14. How many "gas chambers" to kill people were
there at Auschwitz?
many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war?
16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis,
what happened to them?
After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many
as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others
had emigrated to Palestine,
the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war.
17. How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union?
More than two million fled or were
evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942.
These Jews thus never came under German control.
18. How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war,
putting them outside of German reach?
Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR).
19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did
commandant, Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?
He was tortured by British military police,
as one of his interrogators later
20. Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners
in order to exact "confessions"
for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
Yes. Torture was extensively used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the
Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war
21. How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today?
It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of
secular religion, it provides an
emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in
Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel.
22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?
It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations"
Germany has paid to Israel and many individual
It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in
the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year.
23. How is it used by many Christian clergymen?
The Holocaust story is cited to
justify the Old Testament notion
of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People."
24. How did it benefit the Communists?
It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities
before, during and after the Second World War.
25. How does it benefit Britain?
In much the same way it benefitted the Soviet Union.
26. Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered mass extermination
27. What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps?
Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial
that was widely used throughout Europe.
28. For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured?
It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and
quarters to kill typhus-bearing
lice and other pests.
29. Was this product suitable for mass extermination?
No. If the Nazis had intended to
use poison gas to exterminate people, far more
efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent.
30. How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation
with Zyklon B?
Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous.
Gas masks must be used, and only trained technicians are employed.
31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the "gas chambers"
bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this?
It can't be explained because had they done so they
have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims.
32. Hoess said in his "confession" that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled
out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn't Zyklon B explosive?
Yes. The Hoess confession is obviously false.
33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used
to exterminate Jews?
The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from a hole in the ceiling,
to piping gas through shower heads,
to "steam chambers," to "electrocution"
machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these
could a mass extermination program have been kept
secret from those who were scheduled to be killed?
It couldn't have been kept secret.
The fact is that there were no mass gassings.
The extermination stories originated as wartime atrocity propaganda.
35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store
why did they go along with the Germans without resisting?
They didn't fight back because they did not believe
there was any intention to kill them.
36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000.
Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that
Europe during the war, as well
as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict,
when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.
This disease always appears when many people are jammed
together under unsanitary conditions.
It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B,
more Jews might have survived the camps.
39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews
died during the Second World War?
40. Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped
pits and burned.
How much fuel would have been required for this?
A great deal more than the Germans had access to,
as there was a substantial fuel
shortage during the war.
41. Can bodies be burned in pits?
No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed
by flames in this manner because
of lack of oxygen.
42. Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes.
long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators?
About an hour and a half, although the larger bones require further processing afterwards.
43. Why did the German concentration camps have crematory
To dispose efficiently and sanitarily
of the corpses of those who had died.
44. Given a 100 percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled
what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to
incinerate during the entire period such crematories
were in operation?
45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time?
No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate
(12 hours per day). Crematory
ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.
46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box
six million people had been incinerated by
the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?
That remains to be "explained."
Six million bodies would have produced many
tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories.
48. Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz
(taken during the period
when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation)
show evidence of extermination?
No. In fact, these photographs
do not even reveal a trace of the enormous amount of smoke
that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show
evidence of the "open pits" in
which bodies were allegedly burned.
49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws"
They forbid marriage and sexual
Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing
in Israel today.
50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
Years before Hitler's Third Reich, most states in the
USA had enacted
laws prohibiting marriage between persons of different races.
51. What did the International Red Cross have to report
regard to the "Holocaust" question?
An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September
1944 pointed out
that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified.
52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time six
million Jews were allegedly
If there had been an extermination plan, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a
position to know about it. But
because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to
speak out against it, and didn't.
53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an
on-going Jewish extermination program?
54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
As early as 1933, Hitler's government
signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting
Jews to emigrate from Germany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital
55. How did Anne Frank die?
After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen
just a few weeks before the end of the war. She was not gassed.
56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
No. Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France
that the famous diary is a literary hoax.
57. What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated
German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses?
Are these faked?
Photographs can be faked, but it's far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or
commentary to a piece of footage.
Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people
were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were
tragic victims of raging
epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war.
58. Who originated the term "genocide"?
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in
a book published in 1944.
59. Are films such as "Schindler's List"
or "The Winds of War" documentaries?
No. Such films are fictional dramatizations
loosely based on history. Unfortunately,
all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations.
60. How many books have been published that refute
aspect of the standard "Holocaust" story?
Dozens. More are in production.
61. What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000
anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute
was sued for $17 million
by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him
to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact."
62. What about the charge that those who question the
story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?
This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars
who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish).
There is no
correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism.
Increasing numbers of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims.
63. What has happened to "revisionist" historians
have challenged the Holocaust story?
They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions,
loss of pensions,
destruction of their property and physical
64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its
efforts to uphold the right
of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal
arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone
have been received. Media coverage of the IHR
has been overwhelmingly hostile.
65. Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view?
Because for political reasons the
Establishment does not want any in-depth
discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story.
66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of
the Holocaust story,
as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?
THE JEW'S HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE IS THE MOST MASSIVE
CYNICAL EXPLOITIVE FRAUD IN HISTORY
alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war
to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors,
to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore
Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations
from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme
importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests
ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.
No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned
by Germans in
German occupied territories after
the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER
during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were
rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons
being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after
examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more
humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.
War II West Coast Camps for Japanese-Americans
here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p-45_Weber.html )
What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the
use, of homicidal
gas chambers, the manufacture
of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of
derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories"
where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other
outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.
In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews.
World War II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations.
Indeed tens of thousands of imprisoned Jews died during the
last months of WWII
due to disease, especially
typhus, and starvation (The International Committee
of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died
about half of them Jews). After all, as the fortunes of war
turn against the
losing side, food and medicine
become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for
imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine
manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and
firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless
war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).
Indeed there were crematoriums working overtime
as a means of sanitarily disposing
of disease ridden
corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and
never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.
As a matter of fairness, try to imagine what would
have become of all the Japanese
American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of war
turned against an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they
would have been massacred by furious Americans before they had starved to death.
Once you fully realize that there were no "gas chambers"
or such things as
human skin lampshades,
most of the Jewish narrative regarding the so called
becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated by the lowest
sort of scammers.
Only lies need laws for protection.
There are many individuals who have been
occupied Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust
scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting hatred for the Jews" whereas it's
actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES.
Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent.
unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity
via the "holocaust", humanity is
incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with,
any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The "holocaust"
is also an
ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust
survivors" through the collection of hundreds
of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that
continues to this day.
have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense,
with fines and imprisonment,
and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured
many against their official narrative.
The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only
lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever
have done — and want to do in
America — is criminalize not believing their improbable
narrative. It is their
“education” that has created doubters, which is
why it continues to fail.
It's a Crime
Originally appeared at: Renegade Tribune
It is a crime because it not only justifies innumerable
other crimes, but because it
creates a huge mass of hatred, which in turn contains the potential
for new crimes.
People whose souls have been drenched
in the hatred of the Holocaust Lie must be
counted among its victims. This includes the millions
of twelve to fifteen-year old school
children dragged through the memorials of former concentration
weeping uncontrollably at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them.
How much suffering, how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due to the so called
“Holocaust”, this hair-raising Lie of the Century, which the jews invented, crammed down our
throats, and have defended tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment, for
half a century?
It is painful to think of the thousands,
indeed tens of thousands, of people who have
been humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned, or even
executed in the name of this shameless swindle.
is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its pride, its sense of direction,
its self-respect, to such an extent that it no longer dares to defend itself
against a flood
of slander and is too ashamed to look itself in the face.
single mention of the “gas chambers”, the extermination of the jews, was enough to
justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German population. Almost 17 million
were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of
which over two million died.
“After what they
did to the jews, they had it coming to them,”
is the classical justification.
It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over the world watching
Claude Lanzmann, Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust, Shoa,
Schindler’s List, etc. — in the cinemas, on television — and taking it all seriously.
The jews invented a story which they’ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust,
and which they now claim is the history of their people.
The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous advantages,
they can no longer live without it. But they made one fatal error: the Holocaust swindle
so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge; having lost
sense of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down.
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility
in the long run, despite all manner of repression.
minor explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new “Revised Versions”,
the profiteers of the myth continue to entangle themselves in increasingly greater numbers
contradictions; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday; the defenders of
official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessions
that more and more
people are starting to wonder about it all.
expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as they
did a few years ago; it is
getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing.
brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running out. Increasingly
is an unmistakable sign of growing panic.
It is also a sign of
Instead of listening to the discussion, they
simply grab for
a truncheon. But how long can they get away with it?
The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come overnight. They should
remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said:
“Truth must be smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses.
A drop here, a drop there — until people get used to it. Not all at once.”
At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hindrance, we would like
to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make the following appeal:
All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and unknown, from many European countries,
those who, like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel, sit in German and Austrian prisons for
“denying the existence of the gas chambers,” or who have been compelled to go into exile
like Remer and Rudolf, all persecuted revisionists and nationalists — do not lose
courage, since your struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain.
Your courage, the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples, including
the German and Russian peoples — from the darkness which has so long covered them.
Jürgen Graf (Renegade Tribune)
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST
ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”.
is the response I give, to those who will listen:
Excuse me, but I don’t “deny”
ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?
I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer
and historian, Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience
of the 20th Century”; who served eight
long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system,
when he reports in the book he published in
the year 2000 entitled “Together For Two Hundred
Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66
million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and
it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number
of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans
in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured,
raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel,
wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in
the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration
camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik
“Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps.
acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust
of the non-military
city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on
1.2 million helpless
people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column
where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade,
and in which approximately
500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers,
random citizens, and even all of the
animals in the city zoo were slaughtered
by concussion and fire in a single night.
I absolutely recognize that
more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than
the estimated total
of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts,
wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic
attacks upon the Japanese
cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
I openly avow the virtually forgotten
Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the
Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed
German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the
freezing waters of the Baltic
Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945,
as it carried,
besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the
Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women and
– who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army,
where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster
history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic.
And I fully admit that, as tallied and
reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total
of 271,304 people – not
all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps,
combined, by the end of World War
II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus
epidemics and starvation caused
by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply
routes and centers all over Germany
that made it impossible to transport
food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and
I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants
who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care, and
purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under
of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor
concentration camp this side
of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the
wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder
of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of
women and children as the communist
Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge”
upon the defeated Germans.
I do not deny the Holocaust
suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed
USS Liberty surveillance
ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine
gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli
forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174,
in an attempted false flag operation
which was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard,
in order to draw the United States
into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was
only foiled by the
ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator
to successfully get off a call for
And I do not deny the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as
of the false flag attack on the World Trade Center in New York which was engineered
perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their pre-planned “Clash
which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn enemies, the
Christians, and the Muslims,
to forget their historical religious commonalities, and
annihilate one another in the yet to be
the greatest Holocaust in history – a third world
war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the
sidelines… and direct…
and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as
even more untold
millions of innocents die.
I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002,
Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in
indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific
beyond belief”, and
which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town,
and killing unknown hundreds
of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried
alive; or the earlier,
similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps
in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known
that at least 800 Palestinians were killed.
Nor do I deny the wholesale
slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign
nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that
was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression that,
from 2003 to the present, has resulted
in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men,
women, and children, and brought their
country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s
ongoing war of terror, which they have
the unmitigated gall to present to the
world as a war “ON” terror…
for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.
And while I’m
at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators
above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either
directly, or indirectly
committing numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over
even since ancient Biblical times – from the slaughter of the Midianites to the
African slave trade
– a number of which being the basis of, and celebrated during various
And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either.
What I do deny is the ridiculous and
exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all
that ANY Jews at all – much less
“six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings,
a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated
against Jews by
Germany’s Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence
that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war
because none, from either then or now, actually exists.
So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”…
and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal
“Holocaust”, and not only the ones
from the past, but one that is happening right NOW,
in the present, all you need to do is
to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your
collectively ignorant rear ends, and
look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The West
Bank, Syria, and the Middle East
in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic
Jews are feverishly working day and
night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew,
who stands in their way in their
quest to build their racist,
supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz
And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to
the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters
is one that is purported
to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you
to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier”
is one of the most laughable,
and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet
seen anywhere… even
as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove
your ignorance and psychopathy
with every ridiculous charge you make.
OPEN LETTER SPIELBERG COULDN’T REPLY TO
PENNED BY R. Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce,
noted Jewish holocaust researcher:
“Dear Mr. Spielberg, I wish your honesty
to be equal to your talent. I saw you on
in France.You declared that you would pour
(holocaust) propaganda in German
schools.I feel it my
duty as a Jew and
after 20 years of study of the historical
problem of the holocaust, to call your attention
to the facts.Facts are very stubborn and as
no one can contradict them, zealots have been
forced to make disgusting politicians enact
laws which forbid to mentionanything concerning
the dogma of the ‘six-million-gas-chambers’.
Professor Faurisson, who has been studying
the subject for 20 years, has been massacred.
laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof
of the fake
before we study its arithmetical
and technical ineptitude.
No Sir, you will not
find a single witness who saw six
slaughtered. You will not find one witness
gas chambers to exterminate 1000 or 2000
people at a time, close to the crematoria.
The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an
arithmetic and technical nonsense.
As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah
business is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame.
No people in history have ever been wailing about its
losses 50 – 70 years after a war, even its true and real losses.
Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would
be a dishonour
to make such din and pump up so much
We know that 6 million is a gross exaggeration and that the gas
chambers are a technical impossibility. (Degesh Trial in 1949).
In fact, 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in
the German camps of typhus or starvation.
others died but as fighters against Germany
we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933.
We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped
German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania.
We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners
were starved to death after the war
(a quite famous book was published but is
ignored (Other Losses, James Bacque).
We know that all German towns of more than
100,000 people have
been destroyed during the last war,
with women and children:
yet silence about this real
holocaust. If we consider the turn
taken by the Shoah
business, what you intend to do in
Germany is actually
the safest way to a heaping up
of a huge amount of anti-Semitism
the explosion of
which will be unique in history. Discretion
must be our behaviour: all the rest is
Orwellian laws for ‘crime of thought’ cannot prevent
anti-Semitism to explode: only our behaviour can.
What you do and all the whining and money
pumping can only egg it on and it will increase
of reasonable proportions. We must,
at least, try to
avoid such blunders as
the one you intend to perform
Germany and which would be appalling.
POINT 1: Do we know, in the course of History,
of any ethnic group which would not rejoice
when learning that, in a war ended fifty years
before, it had suffered many less losses than
Would the discovery of such good
piece of news, not
be rewarded, and celebrated?
Would he be overwhelmed
with heavy fines,
would he escape attempted murder, as
the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such
not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
POINT 2: Have the living corpses which
can be seen in such films as Night and Fog
(by Alain Resnais), have anything to do
with gassing? Are they not instead of the result
famine in the camps because of the
of German towns containing
more than 100,000 people,
bringing a real
holocaust to hundreds of thousands of
and children who are never mentioned?
POINT 3: Where would have been the 4 million
Jews (if we consider that 2 million were
killed in battlefields), when it is well known
that one camp could not contain more than
people and that except in Auschwitz,
there was no Zyclon-
POINT 4: Are witnesses worth anything, when
you know that torture was the only way
to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of
Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration
has become a legend. What about the 100
of gassing in Dachau, when it is
that there were no gas
chambers situated in that camp
POINT 5: 130 kilos of coal are necessary for
the cremation of just one corpse. We are told
that the Germans cremated 1,300 corpses a
day. The USAAF took hundreds of pictures of
Auschwitz, during the supposed period of
(1943-44). Why is there
not a single heap of the essential
Why not a single column of smoke?
POINT 6: Why do media continue daily to inflict upon
us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers,
in a never-ending whining and moaning? Why
are the Jewish lobby chasing, nonagenarians
attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity
Versailles treaty, from the joblessness
of 6 million
people, who, back to work could give bread to
persons who were dependent on them?
POINT 7: Why does
Jewish Year Book, issue 43, page 666,
inform us that in 1941, there were
3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
POINT 8: How
is it possible that the gas
chambers could be just near
when any chemist will tell you
that Zyclon-B is hyper flammable?
POINT 9: Why are revisionist historians
persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the
A scientific dialogue, a court-ordered
been demanded since 1980
about a problem specifically
technical. It would seal the truth for
POINT 10: How could Zyclon-B gas 1,000
people at one time, when it is well known that
American gas chambers made for just one
person, are of an unheard of complexity and
Why, at the trial of the Degesh,
which fabricated the
Zyclon-B, was it
declared in 1949, that gassing in such
conditions is impossible and unthinkable?
POINT 11: Why did Leuchter, who was in
charge of the maintenance of the US gas chambers,
the firm evidence that there was no gassing
Why have Austrian and Polish
reports confirmed the Leuchter
report? Why is
the Rudolf report, which analyses all
forbidden? Why are those who divulge the
Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law?
And yet the slightest care of the quality
and accuracy of the report is not taken.
POINT 12: Why was,
for the first time in
history, the doctor’s degree
of Mr Roques, on the
Gerstein report cancelled? And
report was not accepted at the Nuremberg
POINT 13: Why did Raymond Aron and François
Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, to which
no revisionist was invited, (state)
that there was not the slightest
a written or oral order for
the extermination of the
POINT 14: Why is it never spoken of the planning
of the extermination of the Germans as
expressed in a book written by the
(Germany must perish),
by sterilisation of German men?
It is undoubtedly a small detail?
POINT 15: How could Zyclon-B, used by the
Germans for hygiene since 1920, be used
the concentration camps for other purposes
and protection against typhus?
POINT 16: Why do they harp on
about the six-million
and never mention 80 million non-Jews
exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish
political regime, the executioners of which
bore the names of Kaganovich, Yagoda,
Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport,
and fifty other
POINT 17: Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada,
did the famous pro-holocaust Jews disgrace
themselves by talking of ‘poetic licence’
in their holocaust assertions,
and who never returned when
summoned to do so
by the judges?
18: Why the Fabius-Gayssot law; the ludicrous fable of
one illness stricken man dragging along 200,000,000 corpses?
POINT 19: Is
it not the supreme proof of the
fake? There is no need
laws imposing prison sentences
one’s beliefs (thought crime of 1984)
by M. Toubon, before he became a Minister
of Justice in France, to set up the truth.
This law is anti-constitutional, anti-democratic,
the rights of men. Facts, proofs,
pros and cons, are
only what we need.
Professor Faurisson besought for
the granting of
a forum with an unlimited number of
contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé
Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to
grant it but refused it almost immediately.
The forum did take place
at the Lugarno television
studios. It was a complete
for the revisionists and was broadcast twice.
Nobody knows it as the media, at the beck
and call of the Jewish lobby, move their
little finger only when authorised by
Jewish lobby to do so.
POINT 20: Why is it that when
declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic
technical impossibility, he is dismissed? This,
for the first time in history, sets up the insane
concept of religious historical dogma,
which in case of non-perennial worship,
to be struck by the lightning
of the inquisition of
a secular state.
POINT 21: Why did the ‘Express’,
French newspaper, in January 1995, assert
that the gas-chamber shown for decades in
Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war,
and that all that concerns it, is false?
POINT 22: There was
actually a holocaust
of 60 million people in a war declared
by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given
bread to six million unemployed, he had rejected
the dictatorship of the dollar and Jewish
totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet
which is called democracy by semantic
Only two parties are left: the totalitarian
exterminating man and
the planet, and Nationalism for
non-Jews not yet poisoned by
Capitalist-Marxist Jewish influence.”
reasons of space this open letter
to movie producer
Steven Spielberg has
been abridged from the French language
original penned by R. Dommergue Polacco
de Ménasce, a Jew who strongly takes
issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy.
The Facts About the Origins of the Concentration Camps
and Their Administration
Here’s a fascinating look at the concentration camp
system inside Germany, devoid of the jewish hysteria often associated with the subject in jewish Hollywood films and in
the “mainstream” jewish media and academia. The Barnes Review and The Scriptorium are pleased to present what
may be the first-ever detailed examination of the concentration camp system, presenting a far different picture from what
we’ve been told by the jews.
In propagating a politicized view
of German history many in the jewish media and jewish academia have attempted to portray the German system of imprisonment
in concentration camps as some sort of precursor to genocide, as a living hell where it was official German policy to make
life miserable and to victimize, beat, torture, rape and murder innocent civilians simply because of religious or political
persuasion or sexual orientation.
Is this sensational jewish
view of history correct? No, the role of German concentration camps was much different and probably better in many ways
than the American prison system today. German concentration camps had a much more positive role to play in Hitler’s
new and progressive National Socialist state.
The facts will bear out that the jewish Establishment historians have purveyed
a view of concentration camp life that cannot be substantiated.
The daily life
in a concentration camp was much different than most historians will admit.
In 1948, Paul Rassinier, a former Socialist and critic of National Socialist Germany who had himself been interned
in the concentration camps of Buchenwald and Dora, published Crossing the Line (Le Passage de la Ligne). In
this work, Rassinier claimed that the Germans had been benign, if not positive, in their motives for putting enemies of
Hitler’s National Socialist state in concentration camps. Rassinier claimed that the concentration camps were a “gesture
of compassion” since inmates had been placed where they could “not hurt the new regime and where they could
be protected from the public anger.”
Not only did the concentration camps protect anti-social elements in Rassinier’s
view, but they were also designed to “rehabilitate the strayed sheep and to bring them back to a healthier concept
of the German community.”1 According to Rassinier, the German government was helping those
whom it committed to concentration camps by putting them in a setting so that they could be rehabilitated into more productive
members of the German community.
Those who fell into the categories of persons assigned to concentration
camps included any person condemned for treasonable activities, as well as judeo-Communist Party officials and anyone who
incited a German citizen to refuse military service.2 Persons who were considered by the authorities of the Third
Reich as being an anti-social malefactor were also sent to the camps.
Anti-social malefactors consisted of professional and habitual
criminals, that is, those people who had been sentenced to a minimum of six months imprisonment or hard labor on at least
three separate occasions. Anti-social malefactors also specifically included beggars, prostitutes, homosexuals, drunkards,
psychopaths and lunatics.3 Persons who were “work shy” were also sent to concentration
camps. According to Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, work shy meant unemployed men who “could be proved to have
refused without adequate reason employment offered to them on two occasions.”4
The first persons arrested and sent to concentration camps were communists who had taken part in efforts to undermine
the fabric of the German state. Most of these communists arrested were denounced to local authorities by fellow workers
and neighbors who were concerned about their activities.
March and April 1933, the German people reported the activities of over 10,000 communists in Germany. Given the large membership
and well-organized activities of the German Communist Party (KPD), the local jails were soon filled, and the National Socialist
government in Berlin was forced to decide where to house these persons, who were a clear and present danger to the continuation
of Germany as an independent and sovereign nation. With the jails and prisons filled to capacity, local officials began
to take over abandoned warehouses and factories to hold the communists. These makeshift holding facilities have since become
known as “wild concentration camps” since they were spur-of-the-moment inventions.
The name “concentration camp” simply means an area where dangerous elements are concentrated.
Hitler once said the idea for concentration camps came from his studies of the Boer War in South Africa.5
During that war, the British built camps and concentrated women and children
of Dutch ancestry. During their confinement in British concentration camps, over 26,000 died mainly of starvation, since
the British made no effort to feed the unarmed and helpless women, nor did they allow them to leave and go back to their
farmsteads. This action of the British against unarmed women and children mainly goes overlooked by jewish Establishment
historians, who instead accuse the German concentration camps of being death camps whose sole purpose was killing unarmed
civilians. But this is not the case.
The first official concentration camp set up in Germany was established
about 12 miles from Munich in the town of Dachau, inside a former gunpowder factory, on March 22, 1933. Unlike what judeo-Allied
propaganda would have us believe, the Germans were not ashamed of this camp. In fact, Heinrich Himmler held a press conference
to announce its opening two days before the first inmates were scheduled to arrive. His announcement was carried in German
newspapers,6 and the camp was opened with the arrival of 200 communists.
But the camp was built to hold 5,000 and was mainly established to act as a deterrent to further communist activity.
Himmler stated that
it was his promise not to wait until crimes were committed before arresting criminals, and pledged that, in order to protect
the populace, professional criminals who had been sentenced many times would be pursued more ruthlessly than before and
isolated away from the German people by being incarcerated in concentration camps. Himmler also added that his camps were
to be models of cleanliness, order and instruction.
It was through this instruction that Himmler hoped to re-educate minor criminals
as well as communists.
Himmler had ordered strong disciplinary measures to be employed, but the treatment inmates
received was just, and they learned trades through their work and training. In the concentration camps, the motto was: “There
is one way to freedom. Its milestones are: obedience, zeal, honesty, order, cleanliness, temperance, truth, sense of sacrifice
and love for the Fatherland.”7
In the Soviet Union’s “model” of socialism, the German communists found what they were looking
for: liberalism, urbanism, and modernism – all of which rejected the traditional Aryan-German way of life.
For this reason, the German communists looked at Hitler’s appointment
to the chancellorship by President Paul von Hindenburg as a signal for an uprising aimed at creating a German soviet state,
closely modeled on the Soviet Union and taking its orders from the Comintern in Moscow. But Hitler saw the threat the communists
posed to German society, and after the burning of the Reichstag by a communist, he reacted swiftly to take them into custody.
Hitler now decided to build the first concentration camps.
of being vindictive or out to do harm to the communists, the concentration camp at Dachau was designed to reform them and
make them into citizens that the Germans could be proud of – citizens who could return to German society at large
and live out their lives as peaceful and proper German men and women. Instead of being an institution aimed at punishment,
the German system of concentration camps was designed to reform and to reeducate enemies of the new German state.
A correspondent for The Jew York Times was allowed to visit Dachau shortly after
it was opened and came away with the impression that the commandant of the camp, Theodor Eicke, and the men under his command
took their job of reeducation seriously.
“They honestly and sincerely believed that their task was pedagogic
rather than punitive…. They felt sincerely sorry for the misguided non-Nazis who had not yet found the true faith.”8
Not only had the inmates not yet found faith in the leadership
of Adolf Hitler, but they also took part in or supported subversive activities aimed at overthrowing the state.
An internal document written in 1934 and circulated at Gestapo headquarters stated that National
Socialist Germany would not be complete until its opponents learned to support it and identify with the goals of the German
community at large. The writer of the document reiterated the educational value and ideological indoctrination that the
camps were to instill in the inmates, and suggested imbuing the inmates with the knowledge that upon their release they would
be able to become full members of German society.9 Just a short time later, another Gestapo document warned all state authorities not to harass released inmates so as
not to make their complete re-integration into German society difficult.10
The Germans themselves often referred to these camps as “education camps.”
In the summer of 1942, three years after World War II began, Himmler was still emphasizing the
re-educational aspects of the camps when he wrote a letter to Oswald Pohl.11 The language that he used in this letter was also given as part of official instructions to guards at the camps.
each guard to make his behavior a personal example to the prisoners, in order to imbue them with respect for the National
Socialist state and to teach them how to behave properly.12
This re-education at the camps was to stress traditional
Aryan virtues, such as hard work, strict discipline, a belief in law and order, support for the complete family and respect
for traditional German society, as well as encouraging them to respect the National Socialist state and the National Socialist
movement in general.
Over the years, tens of thousands of inmates were released from the camps once they had shown that
they had chosen to reform themselves.
On many occasions the commandants
of the camps had determined that inmates had abandoned their old ways and had chosen to become loyal members of German society.
As late as October 1944, inmates were being released, and many of these were communists who had abandoned their previous
Of the persons sent to the concentration camps, many were sent there by court order for fixed terms. Other persons
were arrested because of the danger they presented to German society. Some prisoners, who had been convicted during the
Weimar era, were sent to the concentration camps after their release from prison. Since some of these prisoners were murderers,
rapists and pedophiles, the National Socialist state refused to allow them to return to German society until the authorities
were sure that they had abandoned their old ways. Contrary to modern political myth, German newspapers frequently carried
stories on the concentration camps and often reported on the internment of dangerous persons.
Many of the
camps were open to inspection by foreign diplomats and even by German civilians.
Often the curious persons would travel to the camps only to be met by friendly guards and escorted through the
camps on a personal tour. Of the tens of thousands of prisoners who were released, most probably told their relatives, friends
and neighbors of the conditions present in the camps. Over the years, judges, lawyers, members of the clergy, social workers
and repairmen were allowed into the camps for official business.
Merchants often visited the camps to bring new stocks of supplies, and
local civilians were often employed in the camps. If conditions in the camps had been deplorable, German society would have
learned of it and would have been outraged. The Germans were and still are a decent people whose only crime in establishing
the camps was showing leniency to persons who wanted to do them harm.
a book written on the camp established at Oranienburg, Werner Schafer claimed that some citizens in the local communities
asked permission to send some of their rebelling children to the camps to learn self-discipline. Schafer also said that
some prisoners who were offered release who refused since they could not remember doing work since the beginning of the Great
Schafer listed the types of food eaten by the prisoners and computed how much weight
they had gained during their internment in the camp. Citizens of National Socialist Germany therefore had good reason to
support the officials who administered the camps.
The nature of
imprisonment in concentration camps can best be guessed by a document signed by Himmler, in which the principles of internment
in a concentration camp were clarified. The document was not meant for public distribution and was classified “secret”
before being sent to senior officers of the Gestapo on 27 May 1942. It reads:
Recently, various officials in the party and
the government have begun threatening to lodge complaints with the police against citizens, or to have them imprisoned in
concentration camps, in order to give greater force to various orders and decrees.
this manner, for instance, one officer threatened a citizen that he would be sent to a camp for “police interrogation”
if he did not produce within five days a certain form, as he had been told to do by one of the officials.
I request in all seriousness that the parties involved be instructed to cease this practice immediately,
and if this is not done I will take upon myself to declare publicly that citizens are not liable in such instances to either
police investigation or imprisonment in a concentration camp.
The most severe punishments
lose their deterrent ability when they are threatened at every opportunity, or when the impression is given that every official,
in every office, is authorized to make use of it.
Imprisonment in a concentration camp, involving
as it does separation from one’s family, isolation from the outside world, and the hard labor assigned to the prisoner,
is the most severe of punishments.
Its use is reserved exclusively for the secret
police, in accordance with precise regulations which specify the form of imprisonment and its term. In this matter I have
retained for myself a large measure of authority and exclusive discretion.
All in all
the German people are uniquely fair-minded. Most Germans obey the instructions of the authorities of their own free will
and desire. Instructions accompanied by threats will, however, be received with disrespect and will be obeyed only unwillingly,
not to mention that the multiplication of threats of this type will give a completely false impression, both here and abroad.15
Not only does this document illuminate the fact that the
concentration camp system was not vindictive or there to terrorize the civilian population, but it also shows that the leaders
of the state had concern for the prisoners. Himmler recognized that imprisonment involved isolation and separation from
loved ones and was determined to allow the German people to know that the only persons imprisoned in the camps were extreme
more importantly, as the value of hindsight allows us to [see], the document also allows us to understand where some of
the judeo-Allied propaganda came from; minor officials were eager to add threats to their orders in an attempt to give the
impression that they were more powerful than they actually were. Because of the actions of these minor officials, the judeo-Allies
had the propaganda to claim that the concentration camps were there to terrorize the civilian population and to force them
to become subservient to a state that only cared about itself. This was exactly what Himmler was afraid would happen: that
the concentration camps would be seen to be a punitive punishment and not the center of re-education that they really were.
To meet the needs of re-education, the camp command in each camp was divided into several departments,
which dealt with matters of administration, personnel, transport, communications, mail, equipment, kitchen work, supplies,
health and sanitation and so forth. The camp commandants were assisted by a deputy, an adjutant, a master sergeant, a medical
officer and education officer, a legal officer, a fire officer and others.
commandants were held personally responsible for the re-education of those prisoners who were not considered to be “lost
cases.” Because the camps were often open for public inspections, the commandants were also required to have some
amount of political sensitivity. Starting in 1942, the commandants were also responsible for the work of the camp doctor
and the medical staff.
The camp commandants had full responsibility for almost
everything that happened in the camps, except for the work of the political departments. The political department operated
in the camp as an extension of the Gestapo, and a plainclothes officer of the secret police headed it. This department dealt
with the reception and registration of inmates, and was also in charge of their release. This department:
- Kept files on each inmate that included personal
details about the inmate, the inmate’s picture and fingerprints;
- Was responsible for filing
death notices and was responsible for passing this information on to government authorities;
with the relatives of the inmates in cases where there was a need for guardianship of underage children, insurance claims
and so forth;
- Had the authority to decree special conditions of imprisonment;
responsible for all interrogation that went on in the camps; and,
- Supervised prisoner informers,
censorship, field security, and the prevention of rebellion.
Not all members
of the command had direct and daily contact with the inmates. The inmates were kept in a special compound within the camps,
overseen by their own commanding officer and his staff. Some staff officers were responsible for head counts, others for
work arrangements; others actually accompanied prisoners when they went out to work, while other officers were responsible
for each of the living quarters, which were themselves referred to as a block. The personal deputy of the camp commandant
usually oversaw the prisoner division of the camp.
The camp commandants were also required to prevent cruelty to inmates.
A training manual for camp guards asked the following question: “What is completely prohibited
a camp guard? Answer: Under all circumstances he is forbidden to strike prisoners at his own initiative, outside the framework
of the disciplinary regulations.”
In 1935 Reinhard Heydrich
wrote to the camp guards stating that “it is not becoming an interrogator to insult a prisoner, demean him, or behave
with rudeness and brutalize or torture him when there is no need to do so.” Heydrich went on and warned the camp men
that if they beat prisoners they would be court-martialed.16 Eicke himself wrote in 1937 that “the guards should be instructed to abstain from mistreating prisoners….
Even if a guard had done no more than slap a prisoner’s face, the slap will be considered an act of brutality and
the guard will be punished.”17
The SS actually punished a number of its own men for their conduct while serving
in the concentration camps. Two concentration camp commandants, Adam Gruenwald and Karl Chmielewshi, were placed on trial
and found guilty of the deaths of prisoners as a result of brutality in their camps. The SS tried over 700 staff members
throughout the course of the Third Reich for their conduct toward inmates. This was because the SS and the National Socialist
state always considered concentration camps to be re-education camps first and foremost.
It is true that persons who were considered to be hopeless cases such as habitual offenders were sent to the camps,
but most prisoners always could earn their release by conforming to traditional Aryan-German standards of conduct. Unfortunately,
many guards could not tell the difference between the habitual criminals and those who were there to be re-educated. This
problem plagued the camp administration throughout the history of the Third Reich.
Oswald Pohl complained that “As a result of my personal attention to the matter, and the repeated irregularities
recently noted, I have learned that many of the guards at the camps are aware only in the faintest way of the obligations
imposed upon them.”18
But historians must take into consideration the fact that tens of thousands
of individuals served in the camps. If 700 committed crimes and were punished for it, it only highlights the fact that the
other tens of thousands of Germans serving in the camps took their responsibilities seriously.
Most camp men understood that their personal behavior was a way of encouraging inmates to aspire to be upstanding
and proud citizens of Germany According to an SS booklet:
“The prisoner must know that the guard represents a philosophy superior
to his, an unblemished political approach and a higher moral level, and the prisoner must take these as a personal example
as part of his efforts to correct himself so that he may once again be a loyal citizen in his community.”19
In April 1939, Adolf Hitler celebrated his 50th birthday.
To celebrate this occasion, plans were drawn up for a pardon for several thousand prisoners in the camps. The instructions
that determined who was to be freed and who would remain as an inmate reveal the different kinds of prisoners in the camps
as well as revealing Hitler’s generosity and good will. The intention of the pardon was to free inmates who were brought
to the camps in 1933, six years before.
It was determined to at least consider
releasing repeat offenders who were arrested in the years 1933 to 1934 for short sentences and who had at least served a
year in the camps; political and white-collar offenders who had been convicted on minor offenses and who had served at least
six months; prisoners of 60 or more years of age, including Jehovah’s Witnesses whose faith would not allow them to
swear loyalty to the German state; first-time homosexuals who had not been convicted of sexual relations with minors; as
well as prisoners who had in the past been members of the National Socialist Party.20
Then in 1941 the camps were classified into four groups, in accordance with
the severity of the discipline and conditions of imprisonment imposed upon the inmates. Those prisoners who had been imprisoned
for minor offenses and whom the SS considered to be possible to re-educate had the conditions of their imprisonment eased.
in the camps were formalized in 1938. On weekdays, the inmates worked from 0730 to 1200 and from 1230 to 1700, for a total
of nine hours a day. On Saturdays work was from 0730-1200, for a total of four and one-half hours.
Not only were Saturday afternoons free, but Christian inmates had all of Sunday to attend their
own services within the camp and to contemplate the reasons for their imprisonment.21 Inside the camp, the barracks were segregated by sex, but in many cases prisoners were allowed to marry, even other prisoners.
Registration in such cases was carried out by SS officers.22 The heirs of any prisoner who died while being held at one of the camps were eligible to collect their life insurance.
Since the life insurance policies would expire if the premiums were not paid, and the inmates were incarcerated and without
any substantial income, the SS came up with a solution that jewish Establishment historians will not give them credit for.
The SS set up its own fund to pay the insurance premiums of prisoners until the day they died.23 In this way, the loved ones of incarcerated inmates would not be overly burdened if their relative died while in custody. In 1936, the question was raised for the first time as to who would take care of the children when
both parents were prisoners in concentration camps. Instead of taking the children away from their loving parents as is
now done in countries such as the U.S. and Great Britain, the National Socialist authorities in Germany decided it would
be better for the children if the parents were released on a rotating monthly basis so at least one parent would always
be there to care for their needs. This rotating release continued until one of the parents was released for good.24
Needless to say, this program did pose a slight security risk to Germany, but
Hitler apparently was more concerned about the welfare of young German children than he was with anything else.
Even though judeo-Allied war-time propaganda concerning the German concentration camps paints a
bleak picture with ritual murder, rape, assault and other crimes, the facts of the period do not support this view.
The efforts of the National Socialist authorities to rehabilitate and re-educate incarcerated criminals
and communists show a dedication and a firm belief in their convictions that, in comparison, the United States and Great
Britain are sorely lacking in their own prison administrations. Those Germans, tens of thousands of patriotic citizens,
who served in the camps as doctors, nurses, cooks, clerks, bookkeepers, and guards, were much maligned and viciously attacked
by judeo-Allied authorities in post-war Germany.
1See Pierre Hofstetter, Introduction to Paul Rassinier, Debunking the Genocide Myth: A Study of the Nazi Concentration
Camps and the Alleged Extermination of European Jewry (Torrance, California, 1978), p. x. …back… 2Heiniz Hoehne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York, 1966), p. 225. …back… 4Ibid., quoted in, p. 226. …back… 5Max Domarus, Hitler Reden, v. 3 (Wiesbaden: R. Loweit, 1973), p. 58. …back… 6Becker, Hitlers Machtergreifung, pp. 149-50. …back… 8“Nazi Prison Camps to be Permanent,” The New York Times, July 27, 1933, p. 7. …back… 9BAKO R 58/264 fol. 1309 u. 198a. …back… 11BAKO NS 19 320, May 29, 1942. …back… 12BAKO NS 3 426, July 27, 1943. …back… 14Schafer, Konzentrationslager Oranienburg, p. 247. …back… 15BAKO R 58 1027 fol. 1-291. …back… 16BAKO R 58 264 fol. 309 u. 198a RSHA, January 8, 1935. …back… 17TV Befehlsblätter 1937, no. 5, p. 12, TV file, Berlin Document Center. …back… 18BAKO NS 3 442, November 7, 1944. …back… 19Aufgaben und Pflichten der Wachposten, July 27, 1943, BAKO NS 3 426. …back… 20BAKO R 58/1027 fold. 1-291. …back… 21Natzweiler Routine Orders, February 25, 1943, American Historical Association, Captured German Documents, Microfiled at
the Berlin Document Center, 7. 75 R. 216 2/755081. …back… 22BAKO NS 3 Vol. 426, May 1943. …back… 23Weiterversicherung von Häftlingen, BAKO NS 3 405. …back… 24BAKO R 58 246 fol. 1 309 u. 198a. (RSHA), April 21, 1936.
Click on any of the text below
to hear the truth spoken by accused "NAZIS"
knew nothing of the holocaust lie because there was no intentional "holocaust"
NICHT SCHULDIG! - NOT GUILTY!
REINHARD HEYDRICH ON THE MEANING OF THE "FINAL SOLUTION"
ADOLF HITLER DENYING THE HOLOCAUST
HERMANN GOERING DENYING THE HOLOCAUST
HEINRICH HIMMLER AND HIS FAMILY DENYING THE HOLOCAUST
HEINRICH HIMMLER DENIED THE 'HOLOCAUST'
ALFRED JODL DENYING HIS GUILT
ALBERT SPEER DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
SECRETARIES OF NAZI LEADERS DENYING KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
JOSEF MENGELE DENYING HIS EXPERIMENTS
DENIAL IN JOSEF MENGELE'S FAMILY
OSWALD POHL DENYING KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
ALFRED ROSENBERG DENYING HIS GUILT
OTTO OHLENDORF DENYING HIS GUILT
HANS FRANK DENYING HIS PERSONAL GUILT
FRITZ SAUCKEL DENYING HIS GUILT
WALTER RAUFF DENYING HIS GUILT
KARL WOLFF DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
HANS LAMMERS DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
DAUGHTER OF AUSCHWITZ KOMMANDANT - "THERE WAS NO SMOKE, THERE WAS NO SMELL"
ROBERT MULKA DENIES KNOWLEDGE OF GASSINGS AT AUSCHWITZ (FRANKFURT AUSCHWITZ TRIAL 1963)
DENIAL IN THE FAMILIES OF "EVIL NAZIS"
Die Auschwitz-Lüge: A Personal Account
By Thies Christophersen
I was in Auschwitz from January to December 1944. After the war I heard about the alleged mass murders
of jews and I was quite taken aback. Despite all the testimony submitted and all the reports in the media, I know such atrocities
were never committed. I have said so repeatedly, everywhere and at all times, but it has always been useless for no one
has wanted to believe me. The evidence, I am told, is unequivocal and confirmed without contradiction.
Court cases have clearly established that gas chambers existed in Auschwitz and the Camp Commander Hoss,
has himself said so. Whoever dares to deny this, makes himself suspect of perhaps, having personally participated in the
murders of these jews.
I have been warned to take care because war crimes have
not yet come under the Statute of Limitation (as applicable in any civilized nation) and so I can still be tried and be
prosecuted and it would be best to keep silent.
Friends and acquaintances have
“What would you serve were you still to try to correct history?”
“You cannot change a thing!” “Acknowledgement of our guilt has brought us back into the community of nations.”
“Remember, you have a family“. “No one will believe your reports . . . Keep silent, that’s the smartest
thing you can do.“
Quite honestly, I began to have doubts myself. When
one continually hears the same stories from all sides, it is only reasonable that finally one begins to believe them. “But
what happened to all those jews if they were not gassed?” I do not know, but I wonder where so many jews come
from if six million of them are supposed to have been killed during the war. In my area of the country there hardly ever
were any jews even before the war. So-called “cattle-jews” simply did not exist in rural areas. Spiteful
people have remarked that the only reason for this was that the peasants in these northern lands were smarter than the jews.
Very many jews were able to emigrate before the war, some escaped during the war and many of them have survived the concentration
camps … and of course many jews today live in our midst again.
were first roused when I read a flyer distributed by Einar Aberg of Norrviken (Sweden). He compared official statistics of
the jewish world population before the war with those after the war. He concluded their numbers had increased to the extent
where every woman must have given birth to a child every year of her productive life, if the number of 6 million murdered
jews could be judged to be correct. In 1938 there were supposed to be 15,688,259 jews in the world.
This figure is derived from the “World Almanac” of the American Jewish Committee. In
1948, according to an article in the New York Times by W. Baldwin, there were supposed
to be 18,700,000 jews in the world. Baldwin is a well-known population expert, entirely neutral,
and even the most far-fetched imagination could not describe him as “anti-Semitic.” Thus the story of
the 6 million murdered jews cannot be true, for it is impossible for a nation’s population to increase by 50% in just
The losses of the jewish people during WW II, certainly regrettable,
were not 6 million, but approximately 200,000, according to facts compiled by the UNO, which body surely has no reason to
grant special protection to any one nation in particular.
A book published in
Brazil contains the following statement:
“… These facts were used
by the Canadian Anti-Defamation Committee of Christian Laymen in ascertaining that 200,000 jews died in the twelve years
of Hitler’s rule (1933-45), regardless of how they died, i.e. whether they were killed, sentenced and shot as guerillas
or saboteurs, or in air raids on camps, or through other circumstances due to war, including sickness and old age.“
The leading Austrian Social Democrat, Dr. Benedikt Kautsky — himself a jew — who spent the
years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said:
was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might
have resembled gas chambers.“
Richard Baer, the last commander at Auschwitz
(from 1943) and therefore the most important witness, of whom the Parisian weekly “Rivarol”
reported that he could not be dissuaded from his insistence that;
all the time he was in Auschwitz, he had never seen gas chambers, nor had he known that any existed.“
Commander Baer died suddenly on June 17th, 1963 whilst being held under investigation, although two weeks
previous to this he had been given a clean bill of health.
I never made a secret
of my having been at Auschwitz. When asked about the destruction of jews, I answered that I knew nothing about that. I simply
marvelled at how quickly the populace was willing to accept and believe the stories about these mass gassings, without any
As a result of a war injury in 1940 I developed a severe
case of chronic sinus. The slightest cold put me back in hospital. The Autumn of 1942 brought an official medical finding:
service on the home front. I filed a request for furlough to attend a higher agricultural school and did so in 1942/43.
In the spring of 1943 a commander of Army Headquarters came to our school to solicit agrarians willing to go to the Ukraine
to raise india rubber plants. I applied and was accepted.
A mobile war needs vehicles, and vehicles need tires, and tires are made from rubber. Of course there
is synthetic rubber, made from carbon, lime and sulphur, called “buna.” But without the addition of
natural India rubber to the mixture, it cannot be produced as there is then no cohesion. The Russians, in their attempt
to become self-sufficient (in our case this was called preparation for war), had systematically searched their whole flora
for plants that contained India rubber . . . and found some — among others, one called Kok Sagis, a close relation
of the dandelion. The white latex in its roots contains India rubber. This became very important to carrying on the war.
The motorized vehicles branch at HQ had organized departments for the cultivation, utilization and research of plants with
India rubber content. After a short training period I was sent to the Ukraine to supervise the planting and cultivation
of India rubber bearing plants. I had never seen a Kok Sagis plant, but practical work and assistance from some Russian
agrarians soon provided the necessary knowledge.
In 1943 we lost the Ukraine, and
early In 1944 I was transferred to the department of plant cultivation at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. This institute had
established a branch at Auschwitz, so I went there, and only on my way did I learn that it was a concentration camp. When
relating my experiences at Auschwitz, I have some doubts as to whether I should mention names of former colleagues who today
are still alive and with whom I still maintain contact. I know that I myself must be prepared for reprisals for breaking
the silence. I am now ready to accept these … and in part already have had to do so.
Life In the Camp
It was cold and windy when I arrived
at the railroad station of Auschwitz on January 15, 1944. I wondered whether to go by horse and carriage, but decided to
walk. Leaving my baggage at the station, I asked my way to the camp. Actually the camp, consisting of barracks, that were
ugly but massively built, was very near. The first thing I noticed was the inscription over the gate “ARBEIT MACHT
FREI“, (“Work will set us Free“). I was surprised to see so many inmates of the camp walk
around unguarded. Later I learned that the camp, surrounded with an electrified barbed wire fence was under guard only at
night. There were guards posted outside the grounds, however, who were pulled in at night after roll call.
I reported to my superior, Dr. A., a fine-looking man with steel-blue eyes and reddish hair. He greeted
me warmly. I was curious about the camp and asked about the inmates. He said, “The Germans who are here belong
here . . . apart from that it is the European elite that is here.” Later I discovered there was some truth to
that statement. I was introduced to his co-workers. There was a former Czarist officer, an exile, who also spoke German
and French, and he offered to drive me to my quarters. The officers had no cars but they did have a carriage and a
driver at their disposal to travel on the extensive lands that were under cultivation. However, I found this somewhat pompous.
I also found it embarrassing that inmates whom we passed on the way, took off their caps and stood at attention as we went
by, but we were officers and the SS-men also gave us the military salute.
were in Raisko, about 3 km from the main camp. This was where a women’s camp, the botany buildings with their hot houses,
and the laboratories for our research work were located. I was given a room in an unattached dwelling; I shared the house
with a colleague who was the supervisor of the department of plant cultivation. He was a man with a happy disposition. There
was something heartwarming about his laughter and he was well liked by the inmates and he still corresponds with some
of them today. Later on he had his wife and two young children join him.
moved to an apartment in a botanic building that had just been completed. This I shared with a scientist whose name I can
mention; it was Dr. Boehme. He was shot and killed by Polish civilians who went wild after the capitulation. He had never
harmed anyone and had been kindness and courtesy personified.
The first inmate
I met was “Agnes.” She was a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and was our cleaning lady. I questioned
her about conditions at the camp but she would not speak about them. Not so Mrs. Pohl who was in control of the kitchen.
She also was a student of the Bible and made up flyers which she distributed to the inmates. Actually, this was against
the regulations, but it wasn’t my job to watch the inmates. Apart from that, her publications seemed harmless to me,
and I had always been tolerant in matters of religion. Even now I cannot deny Jehovah’s Witnesses a certain measure
of respect, for they were willing to have themselves locked up and suffer for their faith simply because they wanted to
suffer. There was no need to watch them and they were free to move even beyond the line of posted guards.
In our camp about 300 women were housed in three barracks. They were made up of a select type of worker
who worked almost exclusively for the department of plants. For the most part they were jewish and Polish with a sprinkling
of French. All spoke German quite well and many had an academic degree. Their work was of a scientific nature and they were
quite self-sufficient. In fact, it was not I who was training the inmates, they were training me, and they did so with a
certain pride, in fact, I might almost say, with an air of self-importance. At any rate, I had the impression that the inmates
performed their research tasks gladly and with enthusiasm.
The cultivation of
plants proceeded on a basis of selectivity. The roots of the plants were examined as to their India rubber content and reproduced
through seedlings. Their seeds were carefully gathered and re-sown. Sabotage could easily have been committed but we never
learned of even a single instance. It must be mentioned, however, that the inmates did not trust each other. There was that
ancient feeling of hate between jews and Poles. Compared to this hate, so-called National Socialist hatred of the jews was
The results in increased India rubber production were quite satisfactory.
One of our superiors went to Russia, and returned with a number of scientists. They came with their families and worked for
us as civilians, enjoying their work.
A sort of drama developed with the arrival
of one Russian agronomist, J. Sassmoshek. He found a former sweetheart among the inmates and this re-union had its natural
effects. Sassmoshek married the woman and she was released from her internment. After the evacuation from Auschwitz, I saw
them again at Halle and both were radiantly happy. I myself was not so happy at the time, I had just been through that terrible
air raid of February 13th on Dresden, which had been declared an open, undefended city, and from which I had escaped
unharmed, as if by some miracle. I believe on this one day in Dresden more people died than had supposedly died in Auschwitz
throughout all the years of the war. But the war crimes of the Allies are not debatable, even to this day.
Just what was the daily routine at Auschwitz? Rising at 7 a.m.. washing, showering, breakfast and roll
call, on the job at 8. Lunch from 12-1, and work again until 5 p.m. Roll call once more at 7 p.m., following which the guards
posted outside the camp were pulled in and the camp put under guard. Mail was delivered daily. Packages were opened at roll
call and examined by the camp supervisor. Only rarely had some of the contents to be withheld, such as for instance, certain
medical preparations, books and pamphlets, cameras, radios and technical instruments. These things, however, remained the
property of the inmates and were stored in a huge warehouse called “Kanada“, where also all possessions
of jews interned at Auschwitz, were kept.
“Kanada” was kept
under guard at all times to prevent looting from the outside. In our weather station we had a female SS-worker who, on one
occasion, “organized” a pair of stockings for herself from “Kanada“. She was court-martialed
for “plundering“. However, the inmates themselves, who worked there, stole constantly.
Surprising to me was the elegance of the inmates’ wearing apparel. Their outer garments did, of
course, consist of uniforms, but all other apparel, including shoes, was of the finest quality, nor was there any lack in
beauty care, and make-up was all part of the female dress. Every Saturday our women were sent to the main camp for an exchange
of laundry and they brought back alluring bits of booty, which were then distributed among the inmates. It was a type of
theft that I think was being quietly tolerated.
In May my wife, for the first time, came to visit me. She was a teacher in agricultural home economics
and was curious about my work at the concentration camp. This fact alone, that we were able to have our relatives visit
us at any time, should prove that the camp administration had nothing to hide. Had Auschwitz been the death factory it is
reputed to have been, such visits would certainly not have been permitted. Formalities, such as even today are required for
a visit to that prison camp, otherwise known as East Germany, were not required at Auschwitz. We were a young married couple
and had not seen too much of each other in our marriage. I met my wife at the railway station. She wore wooden sandals without
stockings and a kerchief over her hair. It was war time and elegance was a luxury we could not afford.
At that time I had a new cleaning lady — personal maid would have been a more fitting title. Olga!
Olga was Polish. She was a factotum. But there was something touching about the solicitous care with which she took my affairs
in hand. There were always flowers in my room; always a clean tablecloth and clean curtains, and somehow she always managed
to have a surprise for me.
She had taken special pains in getting my room ready
for my wife’s visit. Above my bed she had attached a praying angel to the wall — Lord only knows where she got
that! Actually, her care was a bit overpowering, but I had to accept since I didn’t want to hurt the concerned soul
that she was.
During my wife’s visit, work was commenced on the india
rubber fields and I did not have too much time for my visitor, but she had the best possible companion in Olga, who could
talk like a waterfall. My wife felt she should compensate Olga for her thoughtfulness and bought her a small gift. The result
was that when I took my wife to the railway station for her trip back home, I hardly recognized her. She was dressed in
new clothes from head to toe. Olga had “obtained” everything for her, even a brand new suitcase. My wife had
brought me a few delicate morsels saved from her own meager rations, among other things, a piece of butter. Olga managed
to make fried potatoes for me evenings and strangely enough there was no end to the butter. Care packages arrived daily
and Olga felt duty-bound to include me in the distribution of this bounty. The inmates at Raisko never went hungry, and any
new arrival looking somewhat undernourished, after only a few days seemed to have a “smooth fur.”
The Death Camp
“The death camp was
not in Auschwitz, it was at Birkenau.” This is what I heard and read after the war. Well. I was also in Birkenau.
This camp I did not like. It was overcrowded and the people there did not make a good impression on me. Everything looked
neglected and grubby. I also saw families with children. It hurt to see them, but I was told that the authorities felt it
kinder not to separate children from their parents when the latter were interned. Some children played ball merrily enough.
Still, I felt children did not belong there and the fact that the English had done likewise — in the Boer War, for
instance, was a poor excuse, I said so to my superior. His answer: “I agree with you, but I can’t change
I had been commissioned to pick 100 workers for hoeing the Kok-Sagis
plants. At roll call the inmates were asked if they were interested in this kind of work and if they had done it before.
Then followed the “selection” of the workers. This “selection” was later completely misinterpreted.
The purpose was to give the inmates something to do and they themselves wanted to be occupied. Selecting them meant no more
than to inquire about their inclinations, their capabilities, and their physical state of health with regard to the work
they were to do.
The fact was, however, that in Auschwitz there were more people
than were jobs. Naturally, I was concerned with getting workers who had experience on farms. Jews, of course, were not experienced
for any kind of farm work, whilst on the other hand, Poles were excellent farm workers. Gypsies were entirely useless. Detachment
11 — that was the name of our female workers from Birkenau — came every day to work in the fields that lay beyond
the outer line of posted guards. I dealt with these people almost daily and listened to their complaints. On one occasion
I saw an SS guard kick a woman. I confronted him about this.
He claimed that the
woman had called him a “Nazi” pig, but the fact was that he had first insulted her. I reported this case and
the SS-guard was sent to “Strafbataillon” in Danzig. From this day on, my favor with the inmates rose
significantly, especially with those in Detachment 11. They often came to me with requests or complaints and I did whatever
I could for them, because to me they were not enemies, they were simply interned. Often, I did favours for them that were
against the regulations. Their greatest joy was for me to take them for a walk down to the river Sula, where on those hot
summer days of 1944 I allowed them to go bathing.
Apart from all else, the hoeing-detachment
from Birkenau was a merry bunch. They sang their Polish folk songs while working and the gypsies danced to the melodies.
In the beginning, I was quite upset and worried about the undernourished appearance of some of the inmates. Then I learned
that they had arrived in rather poor physical shape and it took some time before they had padded themselves with some extra
poundage. Often I shared their common noonday meals and fared well doing so.
Detachment 11 also had a secret supply source. The most wonderful things were found by them in unknown hiding places. In
the night these were replenished by friends of the inmates. Sometimes these friends even donned inmate attire and marched
into the camp, allowing an inmate to take a few days off. Auschwitz was located in Poland and the population helped the
inmates as much as possible, though this was officially not permitted.
troops, but especially the so-called civil administration, often roused the antagonism of the population, as was well-known.
One measure I decidedly disapproved of was the expropriation of land from small farmers. They had to give it up for agricultural
use by the concentration camp. I was told, however, that they were compensated for their property on the same basis as land
expropriated from Germans for the construction of autobahns. I also did not like the re-settlement measures that were carried
out, but I was told repeatedly that these were never forced on anyone. Curtailment of freedom is hard, but war is tough
and it became increasingly tougher for us too. In the fall of 1944, for the first time, the camp at Auschwitz was bombed
by American planes. There were about 20 victims among the inmates. I myself had lost faith in victory after the successful
landing at the English Channel. Reports from the front became more and more ominous, and the inmates too were well informed
— the devil knows through whom.
In our area the inmates were looked after
now just as well as they had been before. Once a week a film was shown. Camp supervisors and inmates jointly saw, among
others, the film “Muenchhausen” and the “Golden City.” Church services were held
in community halls. I attended several myself and found them to be quite solemn, especially those of the Russian Orthodox
Community, to which our Russian civilian workers also belonged. A theater group had been organized by the inmates and one
evening they invited us to a performance of “Faust.” Professional actors could not have produced a better
As for myself, I would have liked to take some more time off for studies
but the war situation was serious and chances were poor. It was suggested that I take a correspondence course, and I sent
away for books. An inmate, a jewish female doctor from Prague offered to help me cram, and she did so every afternoon. This
was possible in Raisko.
The jews were intelligent and so far as I got to know them
in Auschwitz, quite nice too. In the summer my mother came for a visit and stayed several days. Of course, a fat friendship
developed between her and Olga. One evening my mother asked about the crematorium where corpses were supposed to be burned.
I knew nothing about this, so I asked Olga. She could not tell me anything definite either. She did intimate, however, that
around Bielitz there always was what seemed to be a reflection against the sky, as if from a fire.
So I went in the direction of Bielitz and there found a mining camp in which some inmates also worked.
I travelled around the entire camp and examined all fire grates and all smoke stacks, but found nothing. I asked my colleagues;
the answer … a shrug of the shoulder and “don’t pay any attention to those rumors.” Actually,
there was a crematorium in Auschwitz, I was told, for there were 20,000 people there and any city of that size has a crematorium.
Of course people died here as they did elsewhere, but not only inmates at the camp. The wife of one of our supervisors had
also died here. As far as I was concerned, that was enough of an answer.
all the time I was in Auschwitz I never in the least observed anything that even indicated mass killings in gas chambers.
Also the story of a smell of burned flesh that allegedly hovered over the camp at times was an infamous lie. In the vicinity
of the main camp there was a smithy where horses’ hooves were shod. The burning of the horses’ hooves when fitting
them with shoes naturally caused an unpleasant smell. Incidentally, the man who was in charge of this particular smithy
at the time, now lives in a neighboring village.
As a matter of fact, camp regulations
became more generous all the time. In the main camp there was now a brothel for the men. Love and sex, is something human
after all, and was not withheld from those who were interned. Of course there were also love relationships among the inmates.
I doubt that the so-called “house of pleasure” was a deterrent. The fact that such houses did exist for the inmates
in Auschwitz was completely ignored in all post-war reports. An admission to such a brothel was a kind of reward for good
behaviour. There were also some inmates who flung their ticket into the Kapo’s face. Hats off to them, I say, for
that to me was a special show of good behaviour. Olga loved to constantly chatter and her continual gossiping, rumouring
and wondering as to whether or not corpses were being burned (whilst I knew for sure there was no such happening) finally
got on my nerves. This, plus her almost slavish servitude, brought us to a parting of the ways. She was given a new job,
one I did not begrudge her. She was made “overseer” in the women’s camp and it was her job to keep
out men who had no business there. Olga had a gift for “raising hell” and could scold so beautifully
that it was a joy to see her eject males from the female camp. Her fellow inmates called her “Zerberus“,
(hound of hell).
Good old Olga, sometimes I wonder what became of her. She didn’t
want to return to a Communist Poland — almost none of the inmates wanted that, not even the jews. Many of them even
prayed for a German victory. From a colleague, whom I visited recently, I learned that quite a number of them are in the
U.S. He still corresponds with some. Some were also willing to testify on behalf of SS Officers at their trials but were
denied this privilege by Allied and especially by West German authorities. These reports were publicized by the “right
wing” press at the time.
There were no secrets in Auschwitz. In September
1944 a Commission of the Red Cross came to inspect the camp, but it was more interested in the camp at Birkenau.
Publishers note:— Having read the 156-page Report put out by the International Red Cross, it seems
strange that Auschwitz, one of the largest camps of its kind and much publicized as being a “death camp,”
should warrant only a few paragraphs in the Red Cross reporting, and this would seem to add verity to the statements of
We also had a great many inspections at Raisko, but the
people who came were largely interested in plant cultivation. I was often involved in these tours. Although it was actually
not permitted that inmates converse with visitors, they did explain their work to them.
At the time we experimented with colchezin. This is a poison of the Autumn Crocus (colchium autumnale). With the
aid of this poison we developed a plant with twice its number of chromosomes. Such plants tended to grow into giants, but
at the cost of fertility. The collection of plant seed therefore still played an important role, but the harvesting of the
seed was not exactly simple, because the reproduction device of this plant was similar to that of the dandelion. With the
aid of some talented mechanics and Russian agronomists, I had begun to construct a harvesting machine. Some Russian agronomists
worked with a so-called “longalvanization” method. For this purpose, the inmates built tools that worked
with ultra short waves. The material for these I picked up at a shop where planes that had been brought down were dismembered.
The inmates also found material there with which they could build small radios. These of course they could not take into
the camp. I myself learned to build radios at Auschwitz. My teachers were the inmates and they supplied me with everything
I needed for a small receiving set.
At Auschwitz we did not of course only cultivate
plants. Innumerable research tasks were carried out. Because of the availability of workers there, more and more research
work was being delegated to Auschwitz. At that time the place was also fairly safe from air attacks. About every two weeks
the SS officers met for a casino night. On these occasions, department leaders spoke about their particular field of work.
I heard many interesting lectures there and I do not recall anything that might have been offensive. Later on I heard that
experiments were supposed to have been carried out on living human beings. I remember having listened to a lecture on the
development of the embryo in the womb of the mother under various kinds of diet. Whether these women had to carry and give
birth to a child while subjected to starvation diets, I cannot say. We were told, however, that these experiments produced
valuable insights into the dietary care of pregnancies. Reports on experiments of newly developed medicines carried out
on inmates do not appear plausible to me. A medical doctor at Auschwitz told me that new medicines were given to people
only when experiments on animals were concluded. This practise is still carried on in all civilized countries.
After the war I saw a TV film about Auschwitz that showed a building with huge smoke stacks. I am very
sorry, but when I left the camp at Auschwitz in December 1944, I did not see this building. I cannot imagine that these
smoke stacks were built in the cold winter of 1944/45, but 1 suspect that these structures were erected after the war. It
also seems implausible that, if they should have existed, the SS did not destroy them. During the past few days I have heard
a report on the radio according to which 4 million people are supposed to have been shot at Auschwitz. It is an absolute
certainty that no people were shot at Auschwitz, because this we would have heard. I do, however, recall one occasion when
there was great excitement in the camp. A rumour was being spread that hostages were to be shot. This type of revenge is
the most despicable I can think of because it hits innocent people. That it did take place — on either side —
is quite likely. If for every bombing victim an inmate should have been killed, none of the 200,000 inmates would have left
a concentration camp alive. On this basis, considering that Auschwitz was in operation only four years, one million people
a year or 3,000 per day would have had to die. Just what would a crematorium look like in which 3,000 corpses were burned
every day? Even mass graves on this order could not be kept secret.
Yet the German
people continue to believe in these mass murders. Why? We who know the truth, have we not burdened ourselves with an awful
responsibility? Why did we keep silent for so long? I shall try to answer these questions.
- We have not kept silent at all. There was no one who wanted to hear our reports, no paper wanted to publish them,
no publisher print them.
- Even today there are still enough witnesses alive who could verify
my statements and make similar ones of their own. What we need, however, is an unbiased constitutional state. To tell the
truth is tantamount to social ostracism and financial suicide.
- I cannot say that I am tired of life, but my life’s task lies behind me; my children are taken care of, and
my wife should receive her well-earned pension at 65. At least, I hope it will not be withheld from her if something should
happen to me.
- During the long years that I have worked
as a journalist and publisher, I have created a small circle of readers and with the aid of the German Citizenship initiative
I can publish my reports independently.
- It is being maintained
and regretfully also by members and voters of the main German political parties, that “only recognition of our guilt
in starting the war and destroying 6 million jews will make it possible for us to re-enter the community of nations and
that whoever denies that, brings great harm to the German people.”
- However, to disprove the mass murders in concentration camps would not only prove the entire thrust of post-war
German politics to be a mistake, but the post-war politicians still in power would have to admit their political concepts
to be entirely. This must not be allowed.
- Of course there
were also cowards, liars and paid witnesses. Some of the accused who must have known that the testimony against them was
false, still made a confession because they thought — and of this they were no doubt assured — that they would
gain advantages for themselves if they adjusted their statements to the testimony of the accusers. However, it must also
be stated here, that confessions were obtained through torture.
What changes will take place when the disclosure of my own personal experience is made public? Most likely none.
Some sort of decree may be issued against me and an attempt might be made to confiscate this pamphlet.
Our people, especially our children, must be freed from the feeling of guilt being forced upon them by
the victors of the last war — and it is only the truth that will make them free.
I have recorded the memories of my experiences as I recall them. I have stated the truth, so help me God. If these
my statements contribute to our youth having more respect for their fathers, who as soldiers fought for Germany, and who
were definitely not criminals, then I shall be very happy.
January 3, 1973.
2341 Mohrkirch/Kalberhagen. Tel. (0 48 46) 8 88.
The publication of THE AUSCHWITZ-LIE (Die
Auschwitz-Luege) in March 1973 hit the pseudo-democratic establishment like a bombshell. For almost 30 years the world
has been flooded with the official version of so-called ‘Nazi atrocities.‘ All documents and reports
of a different truth had been destroyed or suppressed, all witnesses who dared to give the real story were hanged, imprisoned
or intimidated so that the Inquisition of the 15th century looked pale in comparison. All historians who dared to publish
different facts, came under attack or ridicule and usually lost their contracts for teaching at universities.
Some were even murdered.
The general public therefore had hardly
any access to truthful information and — to a large extent — began to believe that the Germans were brutal monsters
who had gassed six million innocent jews, simply because they were jews, all of them, of course, nice and good-natured people,
the crown of humanity. According to general belief, no jew was ever killed legally for being a criminal or executed rightfully
under martial-law. The death of a jew is always an illegal act — no questions or doubts allowed.
Manfred Roeder, himself having gone through all the methods of re-education, believed for many years that
six million jews had been killed or gassed. He, like so many others, believed that concentration camps were extermination
camps. Until he met Thies Christophersen, who told him the real story from his own experience.
Christophersen is one of the very few unbiased witnesses who has no ax to grind. He was neither a guard at Auschwitz
who may have reason to hide something, nor was he a prisoner who may be inclined to exaggerate his sufferings. Christophersen
was a totally neutral person. He had to work with the inmates of the camp, but had no executive power over them nor the
right to guard or punish them.
His report is so simple and convincing, so un-dramatic,
so contrary to everything anybody has heard about Auschwitz, that it puts to shame all other ‘witnesses’ and
especially the judges who based their judgments on those dramatic stories of ‘professional witnesses’ even if
these stories had to be changed seven times before the court!
of this report with the introduction by a lawyer caused a sensation. This was incredible! After 30 years the whole edifice
of lies and distortions began to crack. There was an outcry of madness by the jews. In Tel Aviv the jewish papers attacked
this book as ferociously as they did in all the Western countries. The Jewish Weekly in West Germany dedicated a front page
article by chief editor Galinski under the banner headline ‘Liars at Work,’ and he called Christophersen and
Roeder the two biggest liars since Goebbels. A flattering compliment because Goebbels was probably the greatest genius of
propaganda that ever lived — and his propaganda was based on facts, not lies!
Wiesenthal urged the courts and the bar association to take ‘proper action.’
“Especially in Mr. Roeder’s preface there are remarks worth investigating.“
At first, the court and bar association refused to do anything. But under growing pressure, finally Roeder
was disbarred for his ‘improper radical political views and actions,‘ and another court in Darmstadt
sentenced him to seven months imprisonment as well as a $2,000 fine plus court and lawyer costs. Only Roeder was taken to
court for his introduction, not Christophersen for his report, because — as the judge sneeringly said to Mr. Roeder
“We have freedom of speech, and anybody can write as he pleases,
but your interpretation of Christophersen’s report sounds anti-semitic, and for this criminal attitude you are punished.“
The court found Roeder guilty of ‘willfully inciting race hatred against a minority‘
(the jews). Denying the existence of gas chambers may include the assumption that all jews, who have testified to the contrary,
are liars. (Which indeed it does!) The merits of the case contain the following statement:
“Even if there had been no extermination program and no persecution of jews at all (which means that all
jews are liars), it is anti-Semitism to suggest that the jews are lying, because it would stir up racial hatred! It would
endanger the public peace!“
The Supreme Court of West Germany declared
this sentence to be invalid, not because it was ridiculous, arbitrary and contradicting any logic, but because it was too
lenient. Another lower court was directed to re-try Mr. Roeder and to increase the punishment to several years, at least,
“a responsible citizen like a lawyer cannot neglect the well-established
facts of recent history. Otherwise he would prove his ill-will against a minority and his criminal intentions.“
Mr. Roeder is now living in exile since January 1978. Literally dozens of similar ‘charges‘
by kangaroo courts are pending. If he returned to Germany under the present political system and occupation regime he would
be immediately arrested and put in jail for ‘defaming democracy’ (as Plato has done) or for ‘unconstitutional
propaganda.‘ By demanding the re-unification of Germany and the withdrawal of all occupation forces, Roeder has
become the most ardent regime critic of pseudo-democracy, which he calls mobocracy. For his ‘thought-crimes,‘
as described in the classic study of tyranny by George Orwell in 1984, he is now persecuted by Interpol, and several warrants
of arrest have been issued.
THE AUSCHWITZ-LIE has
become a secret best-seller with youngsters in Germany, as well as the ‘proof of dangerous neo-Nazi activity,‘
which has to be wiped out once and for all. There is hardly any other book that has caused such public controversy and uproar.
by Mark Weber
Thies Christophersen — pioneer revisionist writer and courageous fighter for truth in history —
died February 13, 1997, at Molfsee, Kiel, in north Germany. He was 79.
In a memoir
first published in Germany in 1973, he related his wartime experiences as a German army officer in the Auschwitz camp complex.
“During the time I was in Auschwitz, I did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassings,” he wrote in Die
Auschwitz-Lüge (“The Auschwitz Lie”). As one of the first important works squarely to confront
the Auschwitz extermination legend, Christophersen’s first-hand account was a major factor in the growth and development
of Holocaust revisionism.
“The Auschwitz Lie” caused an immediate
sensation in Germany, where it was soon banned. This did not stop publication of German-language editions in Switzerland
and Denmark, however, and before long editions appeared in all the major European languages, including several in English.
Christophersen predictably came under hostile and mendacious media attack. Numerous newspaper reports, for example, inaccurately
referred to him as a former “SS officer.”
Born in 1918, Christophersen worked as a farmer in Schleswig, northern Germany, until the outbreak of
war in Europe. Called to military service, he was badly wounded in 1940 while serving in the western campaign. After recuperating
and undergoing some specialized agricultural training, he was assigned to a research center in German-occupied Ukraine which
experimentally cultivated a variety of dandelion (kok saghyz) as an alternative source of natural rubber, to be
produced from the plant’s latex.
In the face of Soviet military advances,
and the withdrawal of German forces from Ukraine, the center was transferred to the labor camp of Raisko, a satellite of
Auschwitz. During the period he lived and worked there — January to December 1944 — Christophersen was responsible
for the daily work of inmate laborers. The young second lieutenant supervised about 300 workers, many of them jewish, of
whom 200 were women from the Raisko camp, and 100 were men from the nearby Auschwitz-Birkenau camp. On a number of occasions
he visited Birkenau where, it is alleged, hundreds of thousands of jews were systematically gassed to death in May-July
1944. Although he knew of Birkenau’s crematories, it wasn’t until after the war that he first heard anything
of “gas chamber” killings or mass exterminations.
A Prolific Writer
After the war he returned to farming. A ardent and life-long defender of the interests of German farmers,
he also turned his considerable talents as a writer to this cause. For years he edited and published the quarterly magazine Die
Bauernschaft (“The Farming Community”), which served as a forum for his straight-forward reporting
and forthright and often witty commentary on farming, cultural, historical and current social-political issues. He also
ran the Nordwind book service, which distributed a range of works, including revisionist titles.
In March 1988 he testified in the “Holocaust trial” in Toronto of German-Canadian Ernst Zündel.
Under oath, he detailed his wartime experiences at Auschwitz, and answered numerous pointed questions by the prosecuting
attorney. (His testimony is related in the remarkable record of the trial compiled by Barbara Kulaszka, Did Six
Million Really Die?, and in Robert Lenski’s book, The Holocaust on Trial.)
Persecution and Exile
Although he was never prosecuted for
his “Auschwitz Lie” booklet, he was put on trial for other outspoken writings. In the 1980s he served a year
in prison on charges of “insulting the state” (“Verunglimpfung des Staates“) and “insulting
the memory of the dead.”
Driven from his beloved homeland, he was forced
to live in exile in Denmark, Belgium and Switzerland. (To its credit, Denmark rejected German requests to extradite him,
pointing out that he had a valid residency permit and had not broken any Danish law.) While Danish police stood by, hundreds
of “anti-fascist” thugs attacked his modest home in the small town of Kollund, pelting it with stones and defacing
it with spray paint. They also severely damaged his book warehouse and, using corrosive acid, ravaged his car and expensive
copy equipment. After months of such abuse, in 1995 Christophersen was forced to leave Denmark. Ill with cancer, he sought
treatment in Switzerland, but in December 1995 was forced to leave that country. He next found temporary refuge in Spain.
Meanwhile, the German printer of his Bauernschaft magazine was fined 50,000 marks.
During his final months, German officials treated him as a virtual “enemy of the state.” His
bank account in Germany was closed down, and in early 1996 a German court rejected his application to return to his homeland
for a brief visit to attend the burial of a son who had died in a car crash. On the grounds that he had no permanent place
of residence, in 1996 German authorities cancelled his state medical insurance coverage and stopped payment of his modest
state retirement pension (into which he had paid for 45 years), as well as his military service pension. Christophersen
was arrested for the last time a few weeks before his death, but a German judge declared him too ill to be jailed. Released
to a son’s custody, he died a few days later.
Click on this text to watch David Cole in Auschwitz (Full Documentary) The Holohoax aka Shoah
David Cole's 1992 visit to Auschwitz and his
interview with Auschwitz museum curator
Dr. Francicek Piper. During that interview Piper
admits that the alleged homicidal gas
chamber was reconstructed from a bomb shelter by the
Soviets after the war and that the
number of deaths at Auschwitz during the years when the
supposed gassings occurred
was 69,000 according to released Soviet documents after the war.
those deaths were from natural causes and only a minority were Jews.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. This film has everything in it. Since Cole was an
orthodox Jew, the museum authorities thought he was onside and freely admitted everything.
As you will see in the Cole video, the holy gas chamber is a fake. Which makes the entire
Holocaust story a fake. You can study it for a day or for a lifetime and your conclusion will
be the same. There was never a plan for exterminating Jews and there was never an
As Professor Robert Faurisson has asked for years, “Show me a gas chamber.
me a gas chamber.” It can’t be done because there was never such a thing.
OTHER JEWISH 'HOLOCAUST' CONCESSIONS
The "gas chambers" claim originated in a report issued by a Soviet Committee
after Germany had unconditionally surrendered (and
thus, could not rebut). (here)
German documents never specifically refer to
a genocide campaign.
Haretz News (Israel)
The story of
Jews being used to make soap is a hoax. (here)
Contrary to Eisenhower's propaganda films, there was no
"gas chamber" at the Dachau Concentration Camp. (here)
Steinberg, Peter Novick and others
The testimony of Holocaust
survivors is often unreliable. (here)
The Jewish Virtual Library
Red Cross inspected the German POW and concentration camps
gave passing grades (but, of course, remained silent about the Jews). (here)
The New York Times
The '6 Million Dead' was proclaimed before
a single camp had been liberated. (here)
Forward (A Jewish Daily)
3000 babies born at Auschwitz
most effective ammunition one can use to blow-up the official fairy tale of the Holocaust ™
consists of the many inadvertent admissions that the enemies of truth let slip out from time
Indeed, one can
wreck the entire Holohoax tale just by using such admissions, and nothing else.
Some examples -- the Holohoaxers themselves admit
tests on the "gas chambers" ™ do not reveal any trace of "gas"
- Millions of corpses or remains were never discovered.
is no German documentation of any mass killings.
- Tales of Jews being
made into bars of soap and lamp shades were invented.
B ™ was a pesticide developed to kill typhus-lice, not people.
Holocaust story relies heavily upon Soviet reports.
/ Soccer games and other forms of entertainment took place in the camps.
International Red Cross had access to all camps and never mentioned any mass killings.
Jewish "survivors" claimed they knew nothing about "gas chambers" ™ in
Of course, after being forced to make these huge concessions, the hoaxsters always
the quintessentially Jewish and truly
psychopathic "yeah but" -- that goes something like this:
"Yes, it is indeed true that (insert any of the above), but blah, blah, blah
-- the Holocaust still happened."
enough of these "yeah buts" together and the silly story begins to take on ridiculous proportions.
"Yeah buts" are the ignoramus's way of
defending his ego, or his lies.
they can be quite useful for turning the argument against him.
One of the strongest "yeah buts" to support us "Holocaust
Deniers" comes from an article published in
-- a New York based Jewish-Marxist publication that dates back more than 100 years.
Just how left-wing is 'The Forward' -- you ask? Well, there are images
of Karl Marx
and his buddy Friedrich Engels carved into the facade of
Just how Jewish is The Forward -- you ask?
Well, both the newspaper and the website also publish
an edition in Yiddish. So when 'The Forward' makes what lawyers refer to as "an admission against
interest" (putting foot in mouth) about the Holocaust ™,
it makes for powerful contradicting
for us truthers to seize upon and disseminate.
Marx & Engels immortalized in
the stone of The Forward. We'll let the "yeah buts"
of the Yiddish-Marxist Forward make our case for "Holocaust Denial."
a look at this shocking admission and "yeah but" that 'The Forward' published just this
July, 2015, and judge for yourself.
Excerpts below -- analysis and wise-cracks added.
This Baby Was Born in Auschwitz — and Survived
Full story -- (here)
Forward: Germans treated pregnant women and newborns living in this section of the camp
less harshly than in the other ones. They were given a little bit more food,
sometimes even milk.
If the Germans were running an extermination camp, why were they expending resources,
during wartime no less, to feed pregnant women and newborns? Why didn't
they "gas" these
eaters" as soon as they showed signs of having been knocked up? If life was so brutal,
and death was always pending, then how did these young ladies
and their husbands /
boyfriends manage to get intimate?
* (It is unclear how many women arrived
at the camp pregnant vs how many
became pregnant while incarcerated. There were cases of both.)
The Forward: Infants
were registered in a registry book....
Germans are famous for meticulous record-keeping, so this is no surprise. Oddly enough,
there are no such German records of the numbers of prisoners "gassed."
The Forward: These
privileges, however, were very short-term; the vast majority of these mothers,
and those of their children who were not murdered soon after birth, perished not long after
in the gas chambers.
So, the big bad Germans allowed couples to have relations (there were private quarters for
rations to pregnant women; waited until the babies were born; and then,
finally killed both the mothers and babies? Makes perfect sense! (rolling eyes
In fact, thousands of babies were born
in Auschwitz ...
a second! "Thousands of babies" --
Mein Gott! Were the big bad "Nazis"
running an extermination
operation or a frickin'
No further response is necessary.
The Forward: ... the vast majority of whom the Nazis killed
virtually upon their emergence from the womb.
"Killed virtually upon their emergence
from the womb," eh?
The mushy story goes on about a Polish woman named Barbara Puc,
who was born at Auschwitz
November, 1944 -- just two months before the camp was liberated by the Soviets. (here)
She tells of how "lucky"
she was and gives credit to God and blah, blah, blah.
Again -- from the Forward article:
"thousands of babies
were born in Auschwitz"
There are more such "miracle" tales that can be found from
Jewish and/or "mainstream media" sources.
There is the "miracle"
of Miriam Rosenthal and her baby, Leslie, a son. From the National Post
"An SS officer
in big black boots and a crisp uniform appeared before the barracks in Auschwitz with a loudspeaker in
All pregnant women line up, he barked.
Line up, line up — your food portions are being doubled.
you imagine?" Miriam asks. "Even women who were not pregnant stepped forward.
I was standing with my younger cousin, but I wouldn't go. She
says, 'Miriam, what are you doing?' "
"Something was holding me
back. Someone was watching over me. I feel maybe my mother, maybe God.
Two hundred women stepped forward and 200 women went to the gas
chamber. And I don't know why I didn't step forward."
Wedding and a Honeymoon Suite too?
This photo of an Auschwitz marriage announcement congratulating newlywed communist
Rudolf Friemel (from Austria) and Margarita Ferrer Rey
(from Spain) was circulated on March
18th, 1944. (here)
officer performed the ceremony. The bride
was given flowers and the couple and
their son (evidently born before Friemel and Ferrer Rey were incarcerated)
were also photographed
by the camp photographer!
The communist couple spent their wedding night in the
camp brothel where they found some solitude, peace and quiet. (here)
In closing, let us repeat, from 'The Jewish Daily Forward': "thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz"
--- again, "thousands of babies were
born in Auschwitz"
--- encore,"thousands of babies
were born in Auschwitz".
reality sink in -- and please share this important piece.
Multi-Media 'Liberators' Project Exposed As A Fraud
Institute for Historical Review
Exposing historical and media fraud sometimes takes years or even decades. In the
case of a recent heavily promoted and widely praised multi-media project –
promote the Holocaust story, condemn
official racism against blacks in America during the
Second World War, and encourage racial tolerance – debunking has come much more
quickly. Liberators: Fighting on
Two Fronts in World War II – a lavishly financed project
that claims to tell the story of how black troops liberated Buchenwald and Dachau
exposed as an error-packed fraud within
weeks of its debut. Producers Nina Rosenblum
William Miles collaborated with author Lou Potter, on the slickly promoted project
that includes a much-touted “documentary” film, a book, a high school workbook,
screenplay and a theatrical version.
We are all familiar with the pictures and film footage of piles of dead “Jews” discovered
at the liberated “death camps” Dachau and Buchenwald at the end of World War II, but what
we were never told is that most of those corpses were actually dead German soldiers that
dumped there as part of an elaborate psy-op by British Intelligence, and many of those
images were filmed by none other than horror film master, Alfred Hitchcock.
The following is an excerpt from the corroborated eye witness testimony of a captured German soldier:
In 1977, during a visit
to New York and Cape May, I recounted the story of the trainload
of dying German prisoners to
two former US officers. They had both been stationed in
Heidelberg shortly after the
war and they knew all about it. They agreed that the cattle
were filled with captured German soldiers who were infected with typhus and dysentery.
…On a sunny day in mid-June 1945, I hopped on a freight train and went to Erfurt.
The train stopped about a kilometer and a half before the station, so I shouldered my
and began walking toward the station. I soon noticed a freight train of about
20 cattle cars
sitting on a side track. A bad odor was coming from that direction.
As I came closer I saw hands protruding from ventilation holes and heard
of moaning, so I crossed several tracks and approached the cattle cars.
inside noticed me and began crying “Water, comrade, water!” Then I reached
the train and recognized the terrible stench of feces and rotting corpses.
The sliding doors and ventilation holes were crisscrossed with barbed wire securely nailed.
Urine and partially dried feces oozed from under the sliding doors and between the boards.
were in fact unwitting extras in a movie being made by Alfred Hitchcock, the
specialist. He had been awarded a contract to make a movie about
concentration camps for the
At night the dead prisoners would be unloaded at Buchenwald,
other concentration camps by those who were still alive.
Hitchcock would then
film them, depicting the heaps of corpses as victims of German atrocities. A
number of corpses were dumped at Buchenwald at night, and next day the
citizens of Weimar were forced to walk past the heaps of rotting corpses and
smell the sickening stench.
of them actually believed the American propaganda, that the corpses
concentration-camp inmates. It was all filmed as part of Hitchcock’s movie.
the corpses were shoved into mass graves in the vicinity. That too was
of the script. This is the explanation that the two former officers of the US Army
gave me concerning the trainload of dying German prisoners that I witnessed on June 16, 1945.
I certify that my testimony is a true account of what
I myself have personally seen
[Note: Alfred Hitchcock was persuaded by his
friend and movie producer the British Jew,
Sidney Bernstein, to leave Hollywood to assist on project “F3080.” F3080 was the name
gave to a project to compile a documentary film on German atrocities.
originated in February 1945 in the Psychological Warfare Division of SHAEF
Allied Expeditionary Force). Hitchcock was recorded expressing
his primary concern that “we
should try to prevent people thinking that any of this was faked.”]
The testimony of the German soldier can be verified by multiple other witnesses, including
British Ministry Of Information, which admitted that the British Broadcasting Company
would be involved in an ongoing anti-German propaganda campaign to
distract the public from
the horrifying atrocities committed by the Soviet army.
And Victor Cavendish-Bentick, the Head of British Psychological
(Propaganda), in a handwritten note, written on Aug 27th, 1943, confirmed
alleged mass murder of Jews in the so-called ‘death camps’ was indeed a
“We have had a good run
for our money with this gas chamber story we have
been putting about, but don’t
we run the risk eventually we are going to be
found out and when we are found
out the collapse of that lie is going to bring
the whole of our psychological
warfare down with it? So isn’t it rather time now
to let it drift off by itself
and concentrate on other lines that we are running.” [Public
Record Office Document F0371/34551
revealed by Stephen Mitford Goodson,
Inside the South African Reserve Bank]
Of course, it would be very easy to confirm the ethnicity of the bodies
in the mass graves
at Dachau and Buchenwald simply by exhuming some of the bodies and running
tests on them. Any simple DNA test could confirm that the remains were Jewish or German.
But as we know from all over Europe, Jewish groups have absolutely forbidden any of these
“Jewish mass graves” to be disturbed because to do so would allegedly
“religious” beliefs, except where it’s convenient to them.
And now governments in America and Europe are spending tens of millions of dollars every year
to make sure each and every impressionable school-age child is shown these faked images
for one simple purpose: to transform the victimizers of World War II into the victims, to
illicit sympathy for the devil.
Click on this text to watch "Nuremberg Executions 1946 - What Happened to the Bodies?" At 5:13 the fact that it took all day
to cremate 11 bodies at a modern mortuary facility is mentioned. We are required to believe millions were cremated at Auschwitz
alone during the last year of the war.
FINALLY . . PUTTING THE “HOLOCAUST” TO BED.
A LETTER TO STEVEN SPIELBERG,
FROM JEWISH FRENCH DR. ROGER
DOMMERGUE POLACCO de MENASCE.
Dear Mr. Spielberg,
I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent.
I saw you on TV in France. You declared that you would pour
out Shoa propaganda
in German schools. You mentioned that witnesses would be convinced for good, as to the reality
of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers). I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years
of study of the historical problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts.
Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them,
our congeners have been compelled to make disgusting
politicians enact Stalino
– Orwellian laws which forbid to mention anything concerning the
of the “six-million-gas-chambers”, definitively reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy.
In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth,
you suffer the penalty of fines or prison or both. Professor
has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been practically massacred. This is utterly ridiculous,
but give the Police and the Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not
be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century!
laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude.
No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 million Jews slaughtered. You
will not find ONE witness of Zyclon-B – gas
exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria.
my “Shoa Sherlockholmized” herewith: it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject.
The “6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense.
As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50
years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a
No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true
and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din
pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic?
You know it as well as I do.
It is all the
more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical
impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in
the German camps of typhus or starvation.
Many others died but as fighters against
Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler
allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed,
before the functioning of German armament factories!).
Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY
We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the
USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish,
from Marx and
Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans
and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that
German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a
quite famous book was published a few years ago, but is
ignored to day). You
will find there included in French the text of a rabbi: “A rabbi pleads guilty”:
unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated.
The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before
Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler.
As for the harm we have
done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin,
or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important
Jews which are much
above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim.
Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:
“The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have
been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind”.
And George Steiner:“For
5000 years we have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others”.
We know that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed during
the last war, with women
and children: silence about this real holocaust.
If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to
do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion
of which will be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour: all the rest is
Neither “mondialism” nor Orwellian
laws for “crime of thought” can prevent antisemitism to explode: only OUR
behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on. It will increase out
proportions, if there can be a reasonable proportion to antisemitism.
I know that it is practically impossible to check our
speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism derives from
the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the
8th day) but we must, at least, try to avoid
such blunders as the one you intend
to perform in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your
films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder).
I hope you will
scrutinize what I send you and escape the folly of the majority
of our congeners. I will always answer you if you
have the integrity
to write to me.
Cordialement à vous.
Signed by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
«Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.
1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which
would not rejoice when learning that, in a war
ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good
of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would
he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder,
as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything
do with gassing? Are they not the result
of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German
towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and
are never mentioned?
3. Where would have been the
4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is
well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people,
and that except in Auschwitz,
there was no Zyclon-
B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).
4. Are the witnesses worth anything,
when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was
the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend . What about
the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official
that there was no gas chamber in that camp?
5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are
told that the Germans cremated
1300 corpses a day.
U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the
holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary
coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke?
6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the
myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never
whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians
who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles
treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic,
from the collapse of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who,
back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?
7. Why does
the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666,
inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just
crematoria, when any chemist will tell you
that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable?
9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax
of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue,
a court ordered
appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical.
It would seal truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths. Such was
the case for Katyn, thanks to
the revisionist Gorbatchev.
could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one
( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard
of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the
which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable?
did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that
there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish
reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is
Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report,
heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and
accuracy of the report is not taken.
12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr Roques,
on the “Gerstein report” cancelled?
still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister,
Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that ” nobody
could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing
first through the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux said: “I admired the skill and perfection
“chartist” performed by M.Roques
in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report” (in his book: “la guerre absolue” 1998).
Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, (to which no revisionist was invited),
(state) that there was not the slightest trace of
a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?
14. Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination
of the Germans as expressed in a book written
by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”), by sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small
15. Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could be used in the concentration camps
other purposes than delousing and protection against
typhus? Why large quantities
of Zyclon-B could be
found in camps where it is official that there never was any gasings???
16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber”
and never on the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR,
by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of
Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews?
during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves by
talking of “poetic licence” in their holocaust assertions, and never
came back when summoned by the judges?
the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood
and another man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses).
19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not
casting out nines? There is no need of Stalino-Orwellian law
“to be put in prison because of ones beliefs” (thought crime of ” 1984 “) as stated
M. Toubon, before he became a
minister of Justice
in France, to set up truth. This law is anti constitutional, anti democratic, against the rights of men.
Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor
Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with
an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended
to grant it but
refused it almost immediately.
The forum did take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the
Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck
and call of the Jewish lobby,
move their little finger
only when authorized.
20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude,
forthwith dismissed! This, for the first
time in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma,
which in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of
a secular state.
21. Why did the EXPRESS, a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber
shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after
the war, and that all that concerns it, is false?
22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war
declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler
had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish
which pollute man and the planet and
which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification. Only two parties are left:
the totalitarian Judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for
the Goyim not yet cankered by
Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress about the
despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington.
He writes: “They have reduced
the Shoah to a financial market. So
the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of
this time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant
of Kiev, the modest
shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman
of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected
Rubens, slept on a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children
to the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American
oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing
the holocaust to a Shoa-business.”
If Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more trial
on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt!
By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.
(A Jew who strongly
takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy)
Click on this text to read TELL THE TRUTH AND SHAME THE DEVIL... by GERARD MENUHIN
Click on this text to watch a Holocaust Quiz
An Important But Little-Known Wartime Camp
While Stutthof is not as well-known as other
wartime German camps, a close look at the history of this important internment center is revealing. The patterns of deportations
to and from the camp, and the treatment of inmates, both Jewish and non-Jewish, disclose some surprising features.
Stutthof (Sztutowo in Polish) was located 36 kilometers east of the city of Danzig (now
the Polish city of Gdansk) in a wooded clearing near the Baltic coast at the mouth of the Vistula river. Hastily set up
as an emergency internment center in September 1939, as German forces were subduing Poland, it was soon established on a
more permanent basis, and in 1942 was officially designated as a concentration camp. (1).
In 1943 and 1944 it was considerably enlarged until it included
three large sections encompassing an area 2.5 by 1.2 kilometers. The Stutthof camp complex eventually embraced several dozen
smaller satellite camps spread across a large part of East and West Prussia. In addition to administration and general upkeep
work in the camp itself, inmates were employed in nearby workshops and factories that turned out equipment and clothing
for the German armed forces. Other internees worked in a camp brick factory and greenhouse, and on nearby agricultural projects,
quarries, ports and airfields. Inmates could send letters and receive parcels. At the end of 1943, a new regulation prohibited
punishment by beating. (2).
Until 1944 there were relatively few Jewish internees. Most
of the prisoners were Poles. In the fall of 1943 several hundred Jews found in hiding in the Bialystok ghetto (after the
suppression of the uprising there) were transferred to Stutthof. (3). Beginning in June 1944, large numbers of Jews began arriving at Stutthof from Auschwitz. The first shipment of 2,500 Jewish
women from Auschwitz-Birkenau was soon sent on to several hundred factories in the Baltic region. Between June and October
1944, 20,000 to 30,000 Jewish women, originally from Hungary, arrived at Stutthof from Auschwitz. In addition, Jewish women
originally from the Lodz ghetto also arrived at Stutthof from Auschwitz. (4).
During the summer and fall of 1944, as Soviet forces advanced
toward the Baltic region, thousands of Jews, including Jewish mothers and their children, were evacuated to Stutthof from
more than a dozen camps and remnant ghettos in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. In particular, Jews were transferred from
the camps at Riga (Latvia) and Kaunas (Lithuania), and the ghetto of Siauliai (Lithuania) in July 1944. Most were evacuated
by sea on scarce ships. (5).
During the second half of 1944, as Soviet forces continued
their westward advance, the Germans transferred large numbers of Jews, including hundreds of Jewish children, from Lithuania
and Estonia through Stutthof to Auschwitz. (6). Many of these evacuees were Jews who had earlier been deported to the Baltic region from Germany as part of the "final
solution" policy of mass deportation to occupied Soviet territories in the "East." (7).
These transfers to Stutthof are difficult to reconcile with
a German policy to annihilate Europe's Jews. If there had been such an extermination policy, it is particularly difficult
to understand why Jews from the Baltic region -- all of whom were supposedly doomed -- were evacuated on Germany's overtaxed
transportation system instead of being killed on the spot. The fact that many of the Jews evacuated by the Germans from
the Baltic area to Stutthof were unemployable children is particularly difficult to reconcile with a general extermination
This new influx dramatically changed the camp's character.
By late 1944, Jews made up about 70 percent of the inmate population. Russians constituted about 20 percent, and other nationalities
made up the remaining ten percent. (9). The camp was divided into separate male and female compounds. Most of the inmates were reportedly young, above all Jewish
girls and young women between the ages of 13 and 22. There was a separate barracks block for Jewish boys below the age of
17. As a rule, Jews did not have to work, although some were occasionally assigned to farm work on the outside. (10).
As a result of the chaos and tremendous overcrowding brought
about by the worsening military situation, conditions in the camp deteriorated badly during 1944. Although new arrivals
were routinely subjected to a quarantine period of two to four weeks, an epidemic of typhus broke out in the second half
of the year. The death rate rose dramatically and reached a high point at the end of that year, when nine percent of the
total inmate population reportedly died during December 1944. Besides typhus, inmates fell victim to enteric fever and hunger. (11).
Camp administrators did what they could under the almost
impossible conditions to save lives. Hospital facilities for inmates were greatly expanded, and eventually took up a whole
complex of barracks. Inmate physicians and nurses, as well as SS medical personnel, worked in these facilities, which were
divided into 12 departments. Unfortunately, care for sick internees was severely limited by a serious lack of medicines
and proper instruments. (12). In mid-January 1945, there were about 50,000 Stutthof inmates, about half of whom were in the main camp. There were 29,000
Jewish internees, including nearly 26,000 women. (13).
On January 25, 1945, with Soviet forces only a few kilometers
away and the sound of gunfire audible in the distance, camp commandant SS Major Paul-Werner Hoppe, acting on higher instructions,
ordered a general evacuation of internees to the interior of the Reich. Sick inmates, as well as a group needed to dissolve
the camp, were to remain behind, he added. (14). Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer has acknowledged the difficulty of reconciling this evacuation order with an extermination
policy. At a 1981 conference, he asked rhetorically: "What was their [the Germans'] intention? Why did the SS march
these people away? ... Why did the commander of the camp in Stutthof give an order in January 1945 that everybody was to
march except for the sick?" (15).
Coming as it did in the middle of winter, this mass evacuation
in groups of fifteen hundred each was a terrible ordeal that claimed many thousands of lives. The ten-day march was carried
out in snow and freezing temperatures, with very little food or adequate shelter. One Polish historian has estimated that
30,000 died during this evacuation trek. (16). One group of evacuees was rescued by Soviet forces in February 1945, but many in this group died after their liberation. (17).
Stutthof's prisoners were not the only ones to endure this
terrible calamity. During this same period, hundreds of thousands of German civilians, most of them women and children,
as well civilians of other nationalities, were slowly making their way westward in the snow and freezing weather. Many of
these people also died during the winter trek. (18).
In March and April 1945, Soviet war planes repeatedly attacked
the Stutthof camp. A bomb that hit the Jewish hospital on March 26, 1945, killed 28 and wounded 35. (19). During the following weeks, Soviet air and artillery strikes became more frequent. By April 20, 1945, a former Jewish inmate
later recalled (20).
Stutthof was bombarded from the
air and ground. The bombing went on day and night.... The Stutthof camp was enormous and from one end to the other it was
burning down from the air attacks. Countless numbers of Katzetler [inmates] were killed by the bombs. I myself was lucky,
because a bomb hit our ward and three-quarters of the sick were killed or wounded.
Evacuation by Sea
In late April 1945, with Stutthof now cut off from unoccupied Germany except by sea, it was finally decided to evacuate
the 3,000 or so Jewish women still remaining in the camp. One inmate who was evacuated on a cargo ship later recalled her
terrible ordeal: (21).
We sailed and sailed and went into
ports many times. Which, I can't remember. But no port would let us stay because there was a yellow flag flying from the
top, meaning the ship was supposed to be carrying people with contagious diseases on board. ...At every port, the captain
declared that he was carrying women refugees and asked permission to unload them.
But time and time again they were turned away, although at one port some German soldiers
gave them some bread. With almost no water or food, the ship drifted for eleven days from one port to another. During this
terrible period, Allied planes twice attacked the unarmed vessel, killing many of the Jews on board. During a third bombing
attack, which came while the ship was anchored outside of Kiel harbor and only a day before the arrival of British troops
there, the vessel caught fire and sank. Many died in the flames or during the mad scramble to get on deck, and others drowned.
One survivor recalls that all but 33 of the 2,000 Jewish women on board perished.(22)
The final evacuation from Stutthof took place on April 27,
1945. Under attack from Soviet warplanes, the prisoners were loaded onto several barges at nearby Hela harbor, which were
then towed westward to territory still under German control. One barge, packed with sick inmates, was destined for Kiel.
Others were taken to the port town of Neustadt near Lübeck.(23) One Polish historian has estimated that 3,000 of the Stutthof internees who were evacuated by sea lost their lives in the
Not all of Stutthof's inmates were evacuated. Hundreds who
were not able to move were left behind in the camp, which remained in German hands as part of the fiercely defended Danzig
enclave until it was surrendered to Soviet forces on May 10, 1945.(25)
Gas Chamber Allegations
Some historians have insisted that prisoners were killed at Stutthof in a camp gas chamber.(26) According to a 1985 statement by Munich's Institute for Contemporary History "more than one thousand" people
were killed in a Stutthof gas chamber.(27) However, the evidence cited for homicidal gassings at Stutthof is meager and not very credible. The camp's "gas chamber"
building, which is still intact, is a small brick structure about two and a half meters high, five meters in length, three
meters wide. American historian Konnilyn Feig has written that it looks "almost like a toy." Polish officials
have seriously claimed that the Germans gassed one hundred persons at a time in the chamber (that is, six or seven persons
per square meter). Homicidal gassings with Zyklon were supposedly carried out intermittently between June and December 1944
in this chamber.(28)
Polish historian Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz believes that this
building was neither designed nor built as a homicidal gassing facility. In an essay published in a semi-official work about
the alleged homicidal "gas chambers," he writes that this building was built as a (non-homicidal) gas chamber
for treating clothes. However, he goes on to claim that this it was sometimes also improvisationally used to kill people.
("Originally the gas chamber was built as a room for delousing clothing, and it continued to be used for this purpose,
too, for as long as it existed.")(29)
Interestingly, the "gas chamber" building is not
at all hidden or camouflaged, nor is it disguised as a shower. Therefore, if it had actually been used as a homicidal gassing
facility, prospective victims apparently would have been under no illusion about the fate that awaited them. It is worth
noting that the Germans in charge of the camp never made any effort to destroy or dismantle Stutthof's supposed "extermination
facility," which is difficult to believe if, in fact, it had been a execution gas chamber. (30).
A West German court that heard "eyewitness testimony"
about homicidal gassings at Stutthof declared in its 1964 verdict that "with regard to the gassings a positive determination
was likewise not possible." Evidence given by several supposed witnesses of gassings was found to be dubious or not
credible.(31) Raul Hilberg makes no mention of homicidal gassings at Stutthof in his detailed three-volume Holocaust work. Two other
prominent Holocaust historians, Lucy Dawidowicz and Nora Levin, likewise said nothing about the camp's alleged extermination
Estimates of Victims
According to Polish historian Czeslaw Pilichowski, director of Poland's "Central
Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes," of the 120,000 people (Jews and non-Jews) who were ever interned
in Stutthof or its satellite camps, 85,000 died. (32). Polish historian Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz has estimated that of the camp's 120,000 inmates, "about 80,000 of them
either died or were murdered." (33). Another Polish historian gives a "conservative" estimate of 65,000 Stutthof victims. (34)
Altogether more than 52,000 Jews were interned in Stutthof
and its satellite camps, according to Jewish historian Martin Gilbert and the Encyclopaedia Judaica. Only about
3,000 survived, they estimate, and add that perhaps 26,000 of the Jewish victims died or drowned during the evacuation in
Although it is difficult to determine the actual number of
deaths with any precision, in this regard it is important to keep in mind that the great majority of Stutthof's victims
were direct and indirect victims of war, including thousands who lost their lives in Allied air attacks during the final
weeks of fighting. As was also the case at Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, a considerable portion of those who
died in the Stutthof main camp were victims of typhus and other diseases who succumbed during the final months of the war.
As we have seen, most Stutthof victims apparently lost their lives in the grim and hastily
organized evacuations by foot or sea. As harsh as they were, these evacuations were not part of any killing policy. In spite
of its high death rate, Stutthof was not organized or operated as an extermination center, and the many deaths there were
not the result of any systematic policy or program.
- Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz, "Stutthof," in: I. Gutman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (New York: Macmillan,
1990), pp. 1421, 1423.
- Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (Gdynia: 1966), pp. 253-254 (English-language abstract);
"Stutthof," Gedenkbuch (Koblenz: Bundesarchiv, 1986), p. 1772.
- "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: Macmillan and Keter, 1971), vol. 15, p. 464;
Martin Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (New York: William Morrow, 1993), pp. 194-195.
- Jean-Claude Pressac, Die Krematorien von Auschwitz: Die Technik des Massenmordes (München: Piper, 1994), p.
199. (In the earlier, French edition of this book, Pressac writes of the deportation of 40,000-50,000 Hungarian Jewish women
from Auschwitz to Stutthof and surrounding area. Jean-Claude Pressac, Les Crémetoires d'Auschwitz: La Machinerie
du Meurtre de Masse [CNRS Editions, 1993], p. 147.); "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol.
15, p. 464; Martin Gilbert, The Holocaust (New York: 1986), p. 686; M. Gilbert, Atlas of the Holocaust (1993),
- "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 15, p. 464; Roman Hrabar, et al, The Fate of Polish
Children During the Last War (Warsaw: 1981), p. 72; M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), pp. 705, 722; Encyclopaedia
Judaica (1971), vol. 6, p. 917; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 200, 207, 208, 209; Benjamin
B. Ferencz, Less Than Slaves (Harvard, 1979), p. 107; "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p.
1772; Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1985), p. 985.
- Y. Gutman and M. Berenbaum, eds., Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp (1994), pp. 417, 420.
- Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam: Univ. Press Amsterdam, 1968 ff.), vol. 20, p. 600, or p. 585-6 (Verdict in 1964
Tübingen case Ks 5/63).
- R. Hrabar, et al, The Fate of Polish Children During the Last War (1981), p. 72.
- Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation of the Stutthof Concentration Camp, Yad Vashem Bulletin (Israel),
No. 17, Dec. 1965, p. 37.
- Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation," Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 36.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), pp. 252, 255; Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation,"
Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 37; Justiz und NS-Verbrechen, vol. 20, p. 600; Central Commission for Investigation
of German Crimes in Poland, German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, p. 112.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 252.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (Gdynia: 1966), pp. 253-254; "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia
Judaica, vol. 15, p. 464.
- Hoppe order, Jan. 25, 1945. Nuremberg document NO-3796.
- Brewster Chamberlain and M. Feldman, eds., The Liberation of the Nazi Concentration Camps 1945 (Washington, DC: USHMC,
1987), p. 92.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 257; Konnilyn Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (New
York: Holmes & Meier, 1981), p. 202; "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; M. Gilbert, Atlas
of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 216-217.
- M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 783.
- See: Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans From the East (Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska,
1989; 3rd rev. ed.), and, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, The German Expellees: Victims in War and Peace (New York: St.
Martin's Press, 1993).
- M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 786.
- Isaiah Trunk, Jewish Responses to Nazi Persecution (New York: Stein and Day, 1982), pp. 322-323.
- I. Trunk, Jewish Responses (1982), pp. 323-326.
- I. Trunk, Jewish Responses (1982), pp. 323-326.
- R. Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (1985), p. 985; O. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation,"
Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 37; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 228-229.
- R. Hrabar, et al, Fate of Polish Children (1981), p. 74. See also: M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p.
- "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; K. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (1981), p. 203.
- Eugen Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (New Haven, Conn.: 1994), pp. 190-193, and, in the original German-language
edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas (Frankfurt: S. Fischer, 1986), pp. 263-266; The
entry by K. Dunin-Wasowicz in the Encyclopedia of The Holocaust (New York: 1990), p. 1423, refers to "the camp's
gas chambers" (plural).
- Statement by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Hellmuth Auerbach), March 6, 1985. Facsimile in: I. Weckert, "Massentötungen"
oder Desinformation, "Historische Tatsachen Nr. 24" (published by U. Walendy in 1985), p. 21.
- E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), p. 191 (in the 1986 German edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen
durch Giftgas, this is p. 263); Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam), vol. 20, p. 600 or p. 585-6 (Verdict in
1964 Tübingen case Ks 5/63.); K. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (1981), pp. 192-193, 200; Central Commission...,
German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, pp. 118-119.
- E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), p. 191 (in the 1986 German edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen
durch Giftgas, this is p. 263).
- It has also been claimed that Jews were gassed at Stutthof with Zyklon in a rail car. See: E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass
Murder (1994), pp. 192-193; Central Commission..., German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, p. 119.
- Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam), vol. 20, p. 615.
- Czeslaw Pilichowski, No Time Limit for These Crimes (Warsaw: Interpress, 1980), pp. 156-157.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 255.
- Szymon Datner, et al, Le Genocide Nazi 1939-1945 (Warsaw: 1962), p. 218.
- "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 15, p. 464; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993),
pp. 195, 217.; According to Polish historian K. Dunin-Wasowicz, "Of the fifty thousand Jews who were brought to Stutthof,
nearly all died." Source: Encyclopedia of The Holocaust (New York: 1990), p. 1423.
the “Holocaust” Was Faked
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the
alleged genocide of the Jews form one
and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic
political and financial
swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international
and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders –
and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
– Robert Faurisson,
internationally renowned historical revisionist
The alleged “Holocaust”
of “6 million Jews” at the hands of Adolf Hitler and National
Germany during WWII is perhaps the greatest deception ever perpetuated
against humanity. National Socialist Germany and her allies were fighting a multi-front
– physically and ideologically – against some of the most powerful
nations in the world at
the time, including the United States, the British Empire,
and the Soviet Union. The idea
that they would divert their precious and scarce
resources and manpower towards
implementing a systematic campaign of mass murder
designed to “exterminate” European
Jewry is simply absurd, and indeed
has no basis in reality, as we will see in the pages that follow.
Simply put, there was no German conspiracy to systematically genocide
European Jewry during WWII, a fact which Jewish “Holocaust”
historians and scholars
have been forced to concede. Aryeh Leon Kubovy of the
Israeli Center for Jewish
Documentation has frankly admitted: “There exists
no document signed by Hitler, Himmler,
or Heydrich speaking of exterminating
Jews… and, the word ‘extermination’ does not
appear in the
letter from Herman Goering to Heydrich concerning the Final Solution
to the Jewish
There were no “homicidal
gas chambers” utilized to murder Jews and other “undesirables,”
as official “Holocaust” propaganda and countless Hollywood movies allege and depict.
Fred Leuchter, an expert in execution procedures who was commissioned by revisionist
Ernst Zundel to investigate the viability of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at the
various German-administered concentration camps, particularly Auschwitz, published
his findings in 1988. The now notorious Leuchter Reports concluded in part:
The author finds no evidence that any of the facilities normally alleged to be execution
gas chambers were ever used as such and find, further, that because of the design
of these facilities, they could not have been utilized for execution
We have produced definitive proof that there were no execution gas chambers utilized
for genocidal purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps. The simple fact of the
is that the holocaust story is not true.
Many people erroneously believe that Zyklon B, a pesticide invented and manufactured
with the support of the German industrial and chemical firm IG Farben, was used for
extermination purposes. In reality, Zyklon B was used to save Jewish lives, not end them,
as it was utilized to kill disease-spreading insects and to delouse clothing
materials in the German-administered camps. Zyklon B was used to
help stop the spread
of typhus and other diseases that were present at the time
in the various concentration
camps. German chemists, including Bruno Tesch, Gerhard Peters and Walter Heerdt,
Zyklon B, with the assistance and support of IG Farben, specifically for fumigation
purposes in the 1920s. Tesch was later brutally interrogated and eventually hanged by the
British after WWII for his alleged involvement in the “Holocaust,” which amounted to him
supplying the SS with Zyklon B in order to fumigate and sanitize inmates’ clothing and
system of concentration camps throughout much of Europe developed and administered
by the Germans and their allies during WWII were simply a network of labor, transit,
and detention facilities – not “death camps”. Jews, political prisoners and Communist
subversives, homosexuals, and criminals were detained and either put to work or imprisoned
in German-administered concentration camps and industrial facilities throughout Europe.
These forced laborers and prisoners were generally
well cared for, at least until the end
of the war when Germany’s supply
lines broke down and chaos ensued as a result of a
deliberate Allied bombing
campaign of German roads, railways, cities, and industrial facilities,
by the combined Soviet and Anglo-American invasion of German territory.
the war, prisoners and workers in the concentration camps received medical
and were even compensated for their labor. They were allowed to attend concerts,
plays, make music, and play sports. If the Germans were determined to murder
these people, why would they provide medical care and entertainment for them? Why
they set up hospitals and ensure sanitary working and living quarters for
they planned to “genocide”?
The simple fact of the matter is that the alleged “death camps” were in reality
where individuals detained by the Germans were sent to live and
work, providing much
needed and valuable labor and man power for the German war
effort. The United States,
Britain and other nations had similar concentration
camps for their internal enemies
and dangerous political subversives. The entire
WWII narrative, especially the alleged
“Holocaust” narrative, is
basically the exact opposite of what truly transpired.
Bolshevik terrorists who overthrew the Russian monarchy during WWI and
the Soviet Union and their Western allies – namely, the United States and
British Empire – committed the real atrocities during and after WWII. National Socialist
Germany and her allies were targeted for extermination and were systematically destroyed,
a fact largely hidden and unknown in the Western world. The Western Allies
the Soviet Union were the real war criminals – not “the evil Nazis.”
During WWII, the British and Americans engaged
in a systematic fire-bombing campaign
specifically targeting German industrial
and civilian centers for destruction. Major cities
all throughout Germany were
fire-bombed, resulting in the horrific death of millions of
innocent German civilians
– men, women, and children. Sir Arthur Harris, head of Bomber
the British Royal Air Force, openly described the barbaric, ruthless nature
Allied fire-bombing policy in October 1943: “The aim of Bomber Command should be…
publicly stated: the destruction of German cities and the killing of German workers.”
The Western Allies engaged in a vicious firebombing
campaign of Germany during WWII at the behest of organized Jewry.
The Allies also sunk German civilian ships escaping the rampaging Soviet Red Army towards
the end of the war, ending the lives of countless civilians including, ironically enough,
Eastern European Jews fleeing the advancing Red Army. In one particularly
example, the MV Wilhelm Gustloff, which was
carrying thousands of civilians, was sunk
by a Soviet submarine, resulting in
the tragic death of roughly 9,400 civilians.
The barbaric, out-of-control Red Army was encouraged to rape, pillage, torture, and
German soldiers and civilians alike as they advanced into German territory,
and they did.
Over one million German POWs and civilians were starved and murdered
after the war,
often suffering gruesome deaths from exposure, thirst, and torture
at the hands of the
victorious and ruthless Allies. The National Socialist political, cultural, and educational
systematically dismantled and destroyed, with many top officials and
imprisoned, robbed, tortured, and even murdered.
Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using
control of the media and Hollywood, and their influence upon the Western
educational establishment. Officially, the Germans are blamed for
initiating WWII and
committing all of the atrocities, when in actual fact the
last thing Adolf Hitler and
National Socialist Germany wanted was yet another
World War. Hitler was determined
to diplomatically resolve the various disputes
and conflicts with his neighbors, and
even sought an alliance with the British
against the Jewish dominated Soviet Union.
The Germans and their allies were
the most disciplined, honorable, and righteous force
fighting in the fratricidal
Jewish-instigated war, while the Allied armies and military forces
ruthless barbarians and vicious murderers. The German people and their
were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust – a real genocide –
and after WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.
the late Willis Carto’s essential pamphlet “A Straight Look at the Second World War,”
originally published in the January/February 2012 edition of The Barnes Review,
legendary American nationalist and publisher clearly explains that WWII
was not the
“Good War” Americans and the rest of the world have been
led to believe. WWII was not
about checking “Nazi” aggression and
designs on world conquest, or “liberating” Europe
from fascism and
tyranny, or even a war of self-defense against a war-mongering, imperial
alliance – it was a fratricidal, Jewish-instigated genocidal campaign
only beneficiaries were the clique of Jewish bankers, plutocrats, propagandists,
Communists largely controlling the United States, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union.
It was, as Carto correctly points
out, the suicide of the West:
[WWI and WWII] must be seen as a civil war in the West; 8.5 million American,
and continental European troops were killed during WWI and 43 million
during WWII. The civilian
count in WWI is about 13 million and 38 million in WWII…
Regardless of persons
like Tom Brokaw (who refer to WWII as “the good war,”) it
was unnecessary, and all
belligerents – Great Britain, America and Russia included – lost.
Parker Yockey pointed out that to win a war, a power must gain
resources, strength and prosperity.
Since 1939, all three major powers who started
and fought it have declined into a pit of escalating
inflation, unpayable debt, national
bankruptcy, loss of national character, the immigration
of millions of aliens and
a highly questionable future.
To state it bluntly, the
entire “Holocaust” narrative – 6 million Jews persecuted, abused,
systematically exterminated by “those evil Nazis” during WWII – endlessly promoted
and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned and controlled mass media, Hollywood, and
educational and political establishment is completely bogus in virtually all respects. The
Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing
them as an alien, hostile, and treacherous force operating in German society, working
to subvert, pollute, and destroy the German nation specifically and Western
Jews were encouraged to leave Germany, and many did. Others were imprisoned or
detained in the various labor and concentration camps established and administered by
National Socialist Germany. Incredibly, some were even permitted to serve in the German
armed forces and live as German citizens, as Jewish historian Bryan Mark Rigg has detailed.
Jews were certainly not killed using “homicidal gas chambers” and
other sadistic forms of
murder in a systematic campaign to eliminate European
Jewry, as official “Holocaust”
and WWII historiography would have
But how exactly was such a monstrous hoax manufactured and presented to the public
as if it actually occurred? What follows is a general overview identifying the primary means
by which the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII was fabricated and presented to
the public as if it were a genuine aspect of our collective history in order to advance
certain geopolitical, cultural, and economic agendas beneficial to the organized
The role of Allied propaganda before, during, and after WWII
The false Jewish “Holocaust” narrative
is really just an extension of an elaborate and
on-going anti-German propaganda
campaign going all the way back to WWI, and arguably
even prior to it. During
WWI, Western (often Jewish) propagandists targeted Germany
and her armed forces
with ridiculous “atrocity propaganda,” alleging in their newspapers
other media outlets that the Germans were engaged in barbaric, ruthless behavior,
including raping, mutilating, and murdering innocent civilians. The Germans, especially
their military and political leaders, were depicted as savage monsters, and were
blamed for starting the war – which is exactly what happened prior to and after WWII.
Typical anti-German propaganda. In
reality, the Germans were the most honorable and righteous fighting force during WWI and WWII.
The Germans were depicted as savage, violent
monsters that murdered innocent civilians.
The entirely fabricated idea that “millions
of Jews” in Europe were being exterminated by
the Germans and other “fascists”
was systematically promoted by Jewish propagandists
and their lackeys in the
West beginning in 1915 during WWI. This slanderous, false
accusation has been
and continues to be endlessly promoted to the often gullible and
Western public, resulting in extremely negative anti-German sentiment, not
mention the widespread belief that the Germans did in fact commit these outrageous
(although quite ridiculous) atrocities.
his book The First Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns With Holocaust
Claims During and After World War One, historian Don Heddesheimer details the fact that
organized Jewry and the mainstream mass media were propagandizing the Western
during WWI with outrageous “atrocity propaganda” leveled against
Germany and her allies,
laying the groundwork for the official “6 million”
figure and the general narrative of the
Jewish “Holocaust” later
institutionalized by the victorious Allies and international Jewry
WWII. According to the description of The First Holocaust provided by
The Barnes Review, Heddesheimer:
… documents post-WWI propaganda that claimed East European Jewry was
the brink of annihilation, regularly invoking nowadays well-known buzzwords like ‘extermination,’
‘holocaust,’ and the now famous and almost talismanic six million figure. It gives details
how that propaganda was used prior to WWI in order to agitate for minority rights
for Jews in Poland, and for Zionism and Bolshevism in Poland and Russia; and demonstrates
Jewish fundraising operations in America raised vast sums in the name of
feeding Polish and
Russian Jews, then funneled much of the money to Zionist and
Communist constructive undertakings
– including banks, unions, and kibbutzes –
rather than to starving Jews. The
First Holocaust also includes eye-opening testimony
from American diplomats and military
attaches stationed in Poland and Russia
that contradicted Jewish persecution claims between
the two world wars.
Although this exaggerated propaganda of Jewish suffering slowed down during the 1930s,
it never completely ceased and received new momentum in the 1940s during the
Second World War. As we all know today, this propaganda skyrocketed after Germany’s
total defeat, as the victorious nations of the Second World War seized upon the
to take advantage of such propaganda and to increase its scope and impact.
book clearly shows that the “six million” figure, together with “extermination”
and “holocaust” claims, are Jewish-Zionist in nature and part of a propaganda pattern
which started at the very dawn of the 20th century in order to promote Jewish political
and financial goals.
To document just two brazen
examples of this deceitful propaganda prior to WWII even
beginning, first consider
an article written by Martin H. Glynn, former governor of the
state of New York,
entitled, “The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop!”
in The American Hebrew on October 31, 1919.
“From across the sea six million men and women call to us for
help, and eight hundred
thousand little children cry for bread,” Glynn
begins the article. He continues:
These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family,
the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter’s cold, the same
to death before the fangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities
advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings.
may not be their keepers but we ought to be their helpers. (Emphasis in original)
Glynn proceeds with his emotional screed, entirely based on Jewish
to demonize the Germans and other White European Christian
peoples, by invoking
the six million figure at least three more times. Glynn
even managed to use the word
“holocaust” in his essay, and argued:
Six million men and women
are dying from lack of necessities of life, eight hundred
thousand children cry for bread. And
this fate is upon them through no fault of their
own, through no transgression of the laws
of God or man; but through the awful tyranny
of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.
In this threatened holocaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical
distinctions, forgotten are the differences of historical interpretation; and the determination
to help the helpless, to shelter the homeless, to clothe the naked and to feed the hungry
becomes a religion at whose altar men of every race can worship and women of every
It must be noted that this
type of rhetoric sounds exactly like what the Jews and their
brainwashed liberal followers say about the millions of non-White immigrants, both
legal and illegal, flooding Western nations – and only Western nations – today.
Shortly after Adolf Hitler’s legal, entirely
democratic rise to power in Germany in 1933, the
Jewish-led propaganda assault
against the Germans stepped into high gear. Samuel Untermyer,
a wealthy Jewish
lawyer deeply connected to the American political and banking establishment,
immediately declared an international boycott of German goods on behalf of international
Jewry, which amounted to an act of war. The Friday, March 24, 1933 edition of the Daily Express,
a British newspaper at the time, featured this leading headline:
“Judea Declares War On Germany:
Of All The World Unite In Action.”
Why were facts like this never presented
in high school history class?
Untermyer would later broadcast an unhinged, extremely vicious anti-German
over the radio in which he decried the Germans as “cruel and savage
advocated a Christian-Jewish alliance to punish Germany. In
the broadcast, Untermyer
hysterically claimed the Germans were “annihilating”
European Jewry by “locking them
in vile concentration camps, starving and
torturing them, murdering and beating them
without cause and resorting to every
other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond
conception, until suicide has
become their only means of escape, and all solely because
they are or their remote
ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating
them.” This slanderous speech was publicly broadcast in 1933, years before
“Holocaust” and “extermination” of European Jews allegedly began.
During and immediately following WWII, deceitful
propagandists continued to level this
“atrocity propaganda” against
the Germans in order to demonize them and prepare the
Western world for the
institutionalization of the myth of “6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis.”
Western and Soviet propagandists, including psychological warfare specialists in the
United States Army and individuals connected to Hollywood, were involved in manufacturing
“evidence” – including fake, altered, or otherwise misrepresented photographs and videos,
“human lampshades,” “shrunken heads,” and other absurd props –
which was used to “prove”
to the world that the Germans did in fact
commit these outrageous atrocities during the war,
particularly at the various
concentration camps and industrial facilities under their administration.
after the German surrender in 1945, Sefton Delmer, the former British Chief of
Propaganda,” is alleged to have stated: “Atrocity propaganda is how we
the war. And we’re only really beginning with it now!” He would go on to explain:
We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate
it until nobody will accept
even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may
still have aboard
will have been destroyed and they themselves will be so confused that they
will no longer
know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run
their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to
please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final.
Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of
and the weeds crop up again – those indestructible weeds of historical truth.
The propaganda used to
instill the idea of a “Jewish Holocaust” into the minds of the public
is extremely emotionally and psychologically exploitative, resulting in psychological trauma,
severe emotional reactions, and a general inability of the broad masses to objectively evaluate
the information they are being presented with. This aspect of the false
“Holocaust” narrative will be discussed in more detail as we continue.
The role of the Nuremberg trials
defeat in WWII, the Allied countries organized a series of military
often referred to simply as the Nuremberg Trials. The trials consisted of the
International Military Tribunal and the Nuremberg Military Tribunal. The Nuremberg Trials
were a total sham, a disgrace to traditional Western jurisprudence, and a violation of
every standard code of military honor and conduct – “show trials” if there ever were any.
According to Article 19 establishing the military tribunal, “The Tribunal shall not be
by rules of evidence.” Additionally, Article 21 states: “The
Tribunal shall not require proof
of facts of common knowledge, but shall take
judicial notice thereof.” As Robert H. Jackson,
chief American prosecutor
at the Nuremberg Tribunal, openly admitted, the Tribunal
was “a continuation
of the war effort of the Allied nations” against National Socialist Germany.
trials were essentially organized to:
vilify, and falsely blame the Germans for initiating
- the war and committing all of the
atrocities and war crimes;
- To whitewash and cover up the very real crimes committed
- by the victorious Allies; and Officially institutionalize the
- false Jewish “Holocaust”
evidence and false, oftentimes completely ridiculous and fanciful, testimony
introduced by the Allies, and many of the German defendants were physically and
psychologically tortured or otherwise coerced into making false confessions during the trials.
One noteworthy case are the false confessions made by Rudolf Hoss, which were instrumental
in manufacturing the fake “Holocaust” narrative, particularly as
it relates to the notorious Auschwitz concentration camp.
Robert Faurisson, a leading historical revisionist and expert on the
various aspects of the
official “Holocaust” narrative, wrote an essay
entitled, “How the British Obtained the
Confessions of Rudolf Höss,”
published by the Institute for Historical Review. Faurisson explains:
Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of Auschwitz
camp. He is often called “the Commandant of Auschwitz,” and the general
knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz.
He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946,
where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in
the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful
that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order
to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000
people had been exterminated,
2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers.
His confessions were false. They had been extorted
from Hoss by torture, but it took
until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the
nature of the tortures
they inflicted upon him.
confessions of Rudolf Hoss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains
extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas
chambers, was a historical reality.
For the full details of Hoss’ case, including the barbaric torture
he was subjected to by
British soldiers led by Bernard Clarke, a sergeant of
Jewish extraction, Faurisson’s entire
article is a must read.
recently deceased Hans Krampe, a German translator, writer, and student of history
devoted to debunking the slanders leveled against his nation and people, has written one
the most concise and powerful summaries of the Nuremberg Trials that I have come across.
The Nuremberg Trials Show (sic), a grand standing, self-righteous performance launched
under the label of “International Military Tribunal” (IMT) – none of its members, except for
the Russians, having actually fought in the war – was a politically motivated orgy of
revenge, malice, hypocrisy, humiliation and lies. The icing on the cake was the simultaneously
ongoing Allied mass murder of the German populace, then very much in progress.
It was a copycat Stalinist show trial, stage managed by Jewish-controlled media hacks,
principal contribution to the war had been the fabrication of anti-German hate
performed by mean-spirited lawyers, oozing with malice,
principal among them high-ranking Soviet
war criminals; zealously assisted by largely
Jewish torturers (interrogators) and sadistic murders
(executioners), often in brand
The role of the iconic
imagery associated with
the “Holocaust” and alleged
“Nazi death camps”
Virtually all of the iconic imagery associated with the alleged Jewish “Holocaust”
out to be entirely fabricated, altered, or extremely misrepresented and
taken out of context.
The imagery associated with the “Holocaust” – photographs of piles of dead bodies,
emaciated prisoners, Jews and other prisoners being “rounded up,” train cars filled
with dead bodies, etc. – has been used to psychologically and emotionally traumatize
the masses, including vulnerable school children, rendering them easily susceptible to
manipulation, and facilitating the false narrative of “6 million Jews sadistically murdered
by the Nazis” to be literally implanted in their minds.
Horrific images such as this have been deliberately
used to psychologically exploit mass audiences.
Photographic and video images depicting piles
of dead, emaciated bodies have been
shown to unsuspecting audiences, inducing
psychological trauma and fear in their minds,
in order to sell the false notion
that the Germans systematically murdered millions of people,
in “death camps.” The fact of the matter is that while the war was ending,
the German-administered labor and industrial camps were not supplied and many people
did in fact perish in horrible conditions. Disease was rampant, especially typhus, and
many detainees died from lack of medical care, food, and clean water. The piles of dead
bodies photographed in various concentration camps throughout German-administered
Europe do not prove that the Germans were systematically murdering the inmates detained
there. It simply demonstrates how deceitful, brazen, and ruthless the Western and Soviet
propagandists were in their efforts to demonize and slander the Germans with this
type of “atrocity propaganda,” an activity they had been engaged in for decades.
some of the iconic imagery associated with the Jewish “Holocaust” turns out
to be photographs of dead German civilians murdered in Allied fire-bombing campaigns,
which were then presented to the masses as “proof” of German atrocities. Again, the
shameless, deceitful behavior of the Western Allies and their Soviet Communist
partners knows no bounds.
The iconic imagery shown repeatedly to mass audiences is never put into context.
The images are simply shown, and we are expected to believe that the “Holocaust”
a real event. The vast majority of people have never objectively investigated
the claims being
made about the alleged “Holocaust” simply because
of the psychological trauma and fear
induced by the imagery, in addition to the
testimony provided by “Holocaust survivors” and
witnesses to Nazi atrocities,” a topic we will explore in more detail next.
The role of “Holocaust survivors” and other
“eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities”
Complimenting the psychologically and emotionally
exploitative “Holocaust” imagery,
which as we have discussed has
either been deliberately taken out of context, misrepresented,
or entirely fabricated,
the testimony of alleged “Holocaust survivors” and other “eye witnesses
to Nazi atrocities” has been used to deceive the masses about this purported event.
The testimony provided by alleged “Holocaust survivors” has been effectively utilized to
psychologically and emotionally exploit the masses, instilling in their minds the entirely
and deceitfully manufactured narrative of “6 million Jews”
murdered at the hands of
“the evil Nazis” during WWII.
historical revisionist and filmmaker Eric Hunt has done a masterful job
only debunking the official historiography of the alleged “Holocaust,” but also of
demonstrating how entirely ridiculous and absurd much of the testimony provided by
“Holocaust survivors” actually is.
In virtually all cases, the alleged “Holocaust survivors” are either
entirely fabricating or
outrageously embellishing their experiences during WWII,
or they are providing testimony
that actually discredits and disproves certain
aspects of the official “Holocaust” narrative
(particularly as it
relates to the purported “extermination camps” in the East
referred to as the “Aktion Reinhard death camps” or “death factories”).
One particularly brazen “Holocaust survivor”
who was exposed as a liar is a man named
Herman Rosenblat. In late 2008, mainstream
news outlets began exposing Rosenblat’s
entirely fake “Holocaust”
story, including CNN. A December 30, 2008 CNN article reads in part:
Oprah Winfrey once dubbed it the “greatest love story” she had
ever heard: a boy
held at a Nazi concentration camp during World War II and a girl on the outside
tossed him apples to keep him alive. They eventually married and grew old together.
It turns out the story of Herman and Roma Rosenblat isn’t true.
two had told their love story for years and years, inspiring a book deal, an upcoming
and stories across the globe on television, in papers and on the Internet
. A children’s
book, “Angel Girl,” was also based on their love story.
When the couple
appeared on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” more than a decade ago,
the famed host called
it “the single greatest love story in 22 years of doing this show.”
over the weekend, Herman Rosenblat issued a statement through his literary agent,
acknowledging the story of how he met his wife was made up.
“Why did I do
that and write the story with the girl and the apple, because I wanted to
bring happiness to
people, to remind them not to hate, but to love and tolerate all people.
I brought good feelings
to a lot of people, and I brought hope to many.
My motivation was to make good in this world,”
he said in the statement.
“In my dreams, Roma will always throw me an apple,
but I now know it is only a dream.”
Rosenblat would later appear
on ABC’s “Good Morning America” television news broadcast
to discuss the fake story he told for years, revealing a great deal of insight into the
nature of the various “Holocaust survivors” endlessly paraded in front of
vulnerable school children and unsuspecting audiences around the world.
Rosenblat, referring to his fake story, explained
to ABC: “It wasn’t a lie. It was my imagination,
in my mind, I believed
it. Even now, I believe it, that she was there and she threw the apple to me…
my imagination, it was true.”
aforementioned Eric Hunt’s powerful films “The Last Days of The Big Lie” and
“The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax” thoroughly expose the fraudulent
many of the most prominent “Holocaust survivors” who have
been utilized to promote
and perpetuate the false “Holocaust” narrative
using extremely emotionally and psychologically
traumatizing testimony. 
role of Jewish Hollywood and the
organized international Jewish
Since WWII, an entire industry relating to the false “Holocaust” narrative has arisen in the
West. Disgusted by the outrageously brazen corruption emanating from the deceitful,
unscrupulous leaders and representatives of “Holocaust survivors,” Jewish academic
Norman Finkelstein wrote a book discussing and exposing what he calls The
Organized Jewish interests and their lobbies have successfully
created an extremely lucrative
financial and sympathy racket based on their
false, entirely fabricated narrative of
“6 million Jews” systematically
murdered by “the evil Nazis” during WWII now known
as the “Holocaust.”
“At the end
of the twentieth century, the ‘Holocaust’ is being bought and sold,” wrote
Tim Cole, a Professor of History specializing in the “Holocaust” at Bristol University, in his
book Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler, How History is Bought,
Packaged and Sold. “In short, ‘Shoah [Hebrew word for
Holocaust] business’ is big business.”
“Holocaust” is indeed an industry at this point – a commodity endlessly pushed
and promoted by academia, politicians, government officials, international political organizations
such as the United Nations, media moguls, Hollywood producers and directors, organized
Jewish groups, the Jewish state of Israel, and others connected to the “Holocaust”
and the “entertainment” complex in the West – which is virtually entirely owned
and dominated by Jews with deep ties to the Jewish state of Israel and the “Holocaust”
industry – have produced countless propaganda films masquerading as objective depictions
of the experiences of European Jews during WWII. These films and documentaries have
served to perpetuate, reinforce, and even expand upon the false, entirely fabricated
official narrative of the “Holocaust,” which has been manufactured and sold to
public during and after WWII.
There are countless “Holocaust” museums and memorials
all across the world, many
of which receive official state funding and endorsement,
including the U.S. Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Not a day goes
by without a mention of the false
“Holocaust” story in the mass media,
“entertainment” complex, or political establishment.
This false narrative
is constantly being reinforced and perpetuated to the public on a daily
often in the most crass, deceptive, and emotionally exploitative ways imaginable.
“Holocaust” narrative has advanced a number of important geopolitical, cultural,
and economic agendas primarily benefitting international Jewry and Israel –
the self-proclaimed Jewish state. These agendas include:
- Elevating the alleged “suffering and persecution” of the Jewish people
- during WWII specifically, and throughout history generally, over all others;
- Covering up the crimes committed by Jewish terrorists, Communists, propagandists,
- and the Western Allies prior to, during, and after WWII by projecting those crimes
- (and even fabricating new ones) on to the German armed forces and their allies;
- Creating an extremely lucrative financial and sympathy racket, netting the Jewish state
- of Israel and the organized international Jewish community billions of dollars annually;
- Serving as the basis for the creation of the Jewish state of Israel, while excusing and
the genocidal, illegal policies and state-sponsored terrorism the Jewish state
- has pursued
since its founding;
- Instilling a deep sense of ethnocentrism
and strong Jewish identity within the Jewish
- community, while demonizing and delegitimizing
White European ethnocentrism and identity; and
the one man – Adolf Hitler – and political movement who stood up for their
and race against the Talmudic forces of internationalism and globalism seeking
- the subjugation
and ultimate destruction of the White race and all genuine nationalities,
in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler described the Jews as having an “unqualified capacity
for falsehood,” and would go on to explain the concept of the Big Lie technique of psychological
warfare and propaganda, which organized Jewry has used masterfully throughout history and
to this very day, especially concerning the false “Holocaust” narrative, in order
to falsify history
and psychologically exploit mass audiences:
… in the big lie there is always a certain force
of credibility; because the broad masses
of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the
deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive
simplicity of their minds they
more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie,
since they themselves often tell
small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort
to large scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths,
and they would not
believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.
the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they
doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.
For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed
down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together
in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the
Keep these profound insights
in mind the next time you are exposed to the endless barrage
propaganda emanating from Jewish Hollywood, the mass media,
and the educational
and political establishment in America and around the world.
The “Holocaust” in a nutshell
A comment on my
blog expertly explained everything you need to know about the
narrative of WWII – a narrative that has been weaponized specifically
“Holocaust” is a mammoth lie, unequaled in its deception. How is it even possible
that, by 1944, the Germans, fighting to defend their fatherland against several enemies
were numerically superior, would have the resources to carry out a genocide of
We have bombastic, ridiculous numbers of deaths shoved down our throats through
tentacle of our Jew-owned bureaucracy, and any rational person who questions
these absurd figures
is intimidated by the Jewish power structure into shutting up and
going along with this gargantuan
lie or is thrown in jail. If one takes the time to
read some basic facts, the Jews’ “Holocaust”
lie falls apart rather quickly.
The Jews, after millennia of oppressing White peoples,
were intimidated when Adolf Hitler
and his Nazi Party came along, finally saying “You
Jews control Germany no more!”
and sought to fabricate an enormous lie to permanently
dehumanize in the eyes of the
gullible masses a movement that in reality was not a brutal satanic
mass of maniacs
with a blood lust, but a movement that peaceably stood up to Jewish domination
of Germany and the world.
The masses have been indoctrinated for decades
about the so-called “Holocaust” by
every part of our Western European and North
American Jew-owned infrastructure,
public schools, colleges, on TV and the news, on film and
radio, etc. and most people
are too gullible to research the other side of the story and form
a balanced opinion on
the matter. Because if they did, few people would believe the sheer stupidity
“Holocaust” fairy tale.
the German infantry shot a Jew or two here and there, but unfortunately in
war all sides commit
crimes. There was no systematic extermination of the Jews,
and let us not forget the Allies
– the “noble gods of war” as portrayed in Western propaganda
almost every German women (including children) east of Berlin, and fire-bombed
burning to death millions of innocent civilians.
The Allies were the evil
World War II, ruled by their Jewish masters.
The Jews are the biggest liars and troublemakers in history,
and let no White person ever forget that.
 See: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2012/02/against-hollywoodism-revisionism.html
 Quote taken from page 16 of the late Victor Thorn’s excellent book The Holocaust Hoax Exposed:
Debunking the 20th Century’s Biggest Lie, available
from The Barnes Review.
 See The Leuchter Reports. Critical Edition, available from The Barnes Review.
 See Thorn’s The Holocaust Hoax Exposed, especially part one
Deconstructing Holocaust Mythology, available from The Barnes Review.
 See: http://www.johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/evil-jew-puppet-sir-arthur-harris-i.html
 See: https://www.britannica.com/topic/MV-Wilhelm-Gustloff
 See James Bacque’s Other Losses: An Investigation into Mass Deaths of German
Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after WWII, available
from The Barnes Review.
 See Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany,
1944-1947, available from The Barnes Review.
 A PDF version of this article is available online.
 See Rigg’s Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and
Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military, available from The
 See: https://barnesreview.org/product/the-first-holocaust-jewish-fund-
 The full article is available online.
 See: https://www.nationalists.org/library/hitler/daily-express/judea-declares-war-on-germany.html
 Untermyer’s August 1933 speech was broadcast on WABC, and was transcribed and
printed in the August 7, 1933 edition of The New York Times. The speech is available online at:
 See: http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3562
 See the heroic German lawyer Sylvia Stolz’s 2012 speech in Switzerland, which
ultimately resulted in her criminal prosecution in Germany for “denying the Holocaust,”
available online with English subtitles here:
 Faurisson’s article was originally published in The Journal of Historical Review,
Winter 1986-87 (Vol. 7, No. 4), pp. 380-403, and is available online at:
 See: Warwolves of the Iron Cross: The Union Jackal, pp. 199
particularly and Chapter 16 generally
 See: http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/30/holocaust.hoax.love.story/
 See: http://www.abc30.com/archive/6666467
 Both documentary films are available online simply by searching for their titles.
 Finkelstein’s book is available from Amazon.com. Richard Hoste wrote an excellent
review of the book for Counter-Currents Publishing, which can be accessed at:
 See Jonas E. Alexis’ article “The Rise and Fall of the Holocaust Industry,”
which can be accessed at:
 See: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/kampf.html
 See: http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-holocaust-in-nutshell.html
Click on this text to view hundreds of videos exposing the HOLOCAUST LIES
children – in a ‘death camp’?…
Do these JEWS look like they've been starved?…
That's not how they would have looked
in a Jew-run Soviet
concentration camp, apart
from having been raped and sodomized, as well.
Likewise, in the Jew-occupied Palestine,
fellow Jews could have
had them killed and
for their marketable body parts.
Whether in their guise as Judo-communists
or in their latter-day incarnation as
the last people
on earth the Jews would want
to be imprisoned by is anyone like themselves.
Mr Hitler's 1941 anti-Bolshevik Crusade
the internment of Jews
unavoidable – clearly
necessitated by the massive recruitment of
the Jews by the NKVD (KGB).
FBI and the German
Gestapo had numerous
examples of having arrested some
Soviet spies – only to find that they've got
Jews in custody.
contrast, no such hostile
recruitment was ever evidenced in regard of
the Japanese-Americans, who were interned
on purely racial grounds. (And
how many of
them would have
survived in the American
‘death camps’ – had the U.S. lost the war?)
As far as
the Third Reich was concerned,
from 1941 on, the Jewish problem suddenly
became a matter of security, rather than
a racial or political matter.
despite Mr Hitler's 1941 Commissar Order
providing for summary executions of all
terrorist suspects in a war zone, no measures
of any kind were taken against the Mountain
Jews of North Caucasus, as their Muslim
neighbours vouched that they weren't
involved with communism.
And the Germans
appreciated the friendly disposition on the
part of the Muslims, who, of course, were
glad to see the back of the Soviets
– and paid
price when the scumbags returned.
GULAG boss Moishe Berman with his accomplices.
Semi-anonymous KGB cutthroats exterminated sixty six
million – and not one of those vile Judo-communist mass
murderers was ever prosecuted in ‘democratized’
Yet the Jew/KGB-suborned Russian
media gloated every
time some dying ex-SS-man was being dragged through
the courts by the bloodthirsty Jews
in ‘democratic’ West.
the Soviet times, KGB – this partly Jewish gang
mass murderers and bumbling
poisoners – was a mere government agency.
became the government itself.
Offer the FREE HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE to those
who may need it: http://user1252122.sites.myregisteredsite.com/id172.html
TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!
TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES
OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!
FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY
AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS
CRIME MOB ATROCITIES:
RED CROSS RECORDS SHOW
271,301 TOTAL PERSONS DIED IN ALL GERMAN PRISON CAMPS DURING ALL OF WW II.
FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS
FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS CRIME MOB ATROCITIES!
1919 CE-1921 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Americans had
a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans, following
WWI the Americans set up a quarantine, disinfection and work camp at Oświęcim (Auschwitz)
in 1919 CE to combat
American Polish Typhus Relief Expedition 1919-1921 established the camp(s) because it was less than
50 miles to Krakow, Poland and had excellent railroad connections.
Local gardens producing food at reasonable prices.
From there also, the peasants refugees could be spread out over the farms in western Galicia
to help with the
thereby easing the burden that they were to the country.” The American-Poland Camp “housed some
700 children and about 2,500 prisoners.” A Red Cross
hospital was established there for refugees, some 5,000
to 6,000 persons per day and about 75% were transient military personnel. The American army
used Zyklon, once
epidemics started to arrive around 1942 CE. A 1921 CE report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant”
described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated
on Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was
gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their
hair cut off and were
showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps.
ISRAEL 100 YEARS OF AMERICANS DYING FOR ZIONIST
ROBBERY OF PALESTINE OVER 70 YEARS OF MASS MURDER AND OVERWHELMING
BENJAMIN FREEDMAN – DESCRIBES HOW ZIONIST FORCED USA INTO WW 1!
1919 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX —
THE BALFOUR DECLARATION, WORLD WAR ONE AND 6 MILLION JEWS —
During WW I the British Government had agreed with leading Rothschilds Crime
Mob Ashkenazis that they
a Ashkenazi homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Ashkenazi lobby in America
(ROTHSCHILDS AIPAC) getting the USA into WW II. This led
to the Balfour Declaration being made by the
British Government promising the Ashkenazis a homeland in Palestine. After WW I the British Government were
unable, or unwilling, to make good
on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Ashkenazis claimed 6 million Jews
in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in
Palestine. This was
before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.
1925 CE-1941 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — HUMAN SOAP LIES & PROPAGANDA —
“the classic lie of war
propaganda” Radha Binod Pal (1886 – 1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the
version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials. He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial
which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference
to the World War I British propaganda
lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed into them making soap.
In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament,
the story was untrue, in 1941 CE, “there
wasn’t a word of truth in it”, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II. Same Ashkenazi lies about
1933 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Jewish World Almanacs on Jewish Population
show 1933 population of 15,315,000 Jews and show in 1948 15,753,000 Jews.
1933 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Haavara Agreement – THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
between HITLER and Zionists Negotiated to send Ashkenazis
1933 CE-1934 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— GOEBBELS HAD A SPECIAL GERMAN COIN MINTED TO CELEBRATE
ZIONISM & it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other
side. Mildenstein, SS Office for
Jewish Affairs, travelled to Palestine for 6 months accompanied by Zionist officials & spent
time at Kibbutz Farms. ZIONISTS THANKED GOEBBELS
FOR THE ‘RACE LAWS’ OF 1935 CE.
HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germany introduced strict race separation laws and the Head of Germany’s
Zionist Movement Mr Georg Kareski gave an interview said
he had been trying for years to find a method to
keep the two races (Germans & Jews) separate, and he said the race laws supported the
Jewish desires as the Jews had been struggling against assimilation
for nearly 2000 years.
1936 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
A growing enormous opposition to the Haavara Transfer Agreement came from
powerful Jewish circles in the USA. Many of European Jews were extremely rich
and powerful and they had
use their influence to sabotage the Haavara Agreement. They set up armed resistance and agitator
groups to fight against Hitlers idea. They also spread fabricated
‘atrocity’ propaganda about how badly Jews
were being treated in Germany. This propaganda was designed to swing world opinion against
Hitlers Haavara Pact.
1938 CE-1949 CE: Mengele (1911 CE-1979 CE) spent three years with a Waffen SS unit, mostly in the East and
in Russia, where, according to SS records, he was wounded and declared medically unfit for combat.
He was a German officer and physician in Auschwitz camp supposedly
to perform human experiments
on prisoners. Mengele had doctorates in anthropology and medicine and
was a researcher interested in genetics.
After the war Mengele sailed to Argentina in 1949 and ended up in Brazil
in 1960. The Ashkenazis were after
him all that time, and supposedly he drowned after suffering a stroke while
swimming off the Brazilian
coast in 1979 CE. After the war he was intercepted in his travel by British
Intelligence who were interested
in Mengele’s supposed work on creating bizarre trauma for breaking
young people and creating a blank slate
brain-wiped individual who could be “layered” with “alters”
(Programmed) that would robotically carry out
spying or dangerous criminal activities. British thought they most needed the perfect trauma
transnational robotic tools of war. But Mengele may have been a front or
victim of his own work and became
a brainwashed and did as he was told – whatever he was told like smile,
chuckle, and he might have become
a display or front for the British. The British Ashkenazis were so paranoid that in 1985,
amidst much hoopla,
they put on a HOLY-HOAX show trial conducted to quell the MEDIA DEVELOPED
uprisings of hate against
Mengele and his fellow escapes. Of course, with NO DEFENSE, he was found “guilty”
in his absence, but it
was just for the cameras. The Ashkenazi Brits and Yanks didn’t want
any discussion of brainwashing, and nobody
was thought able to believe it was considered so bizarre. Mengele’s
research ideas and efforts likely led to
the CIA-Monarch programming program which was designed for brainwashing to
program our children’s
futures. Mengele is now fully linked to “Monarch Programming”
on the internet thanks to MEDIA HYPE.
1939 CE-1944 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — British government decided in 1941 CE
that there were not enough
dramatic photographs of Nazi atrocities and the BRITISH COVERT OPERATIONS (BSC) arranged for a studio
in CANADA to create such photographs using actors, stage-sets,
costumes, and dummies for the manufacture
of war scenes in which actors dressed up as Nazi soldiers were shown mass-murdering innocent people. These
photos were widely circulated in the United States. –
Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the
United States, 1939 CE-1944 CE. WWII UK and US PSYOPS Exposed the details of how British and
set up a
fake German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities”
with which to get the American public to support the war
against Germany. PURE FAKERY IN ENGLAND +
CANADA + AMERICA too fake photos to demonize the Germans! And they still teach it in High School & College
history classes. The American army used Zyklon for a typhus
epidemic in 1942 CE. A 1921 report in the
New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant” described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated
Hoffman’s Island, New York.
Their clothing was gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while
the immigrants had their hair cut off and were put through
showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the
same process in the German camps. THE SOVIET, BRITISH, AND AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY FORGERY FACTORIES
— Russian forgery experts spent most of their time
in producing material designed to delude, confound and
mislead their perceived enemies, both domestic and foreign. Much of this began after the Second
World War with
rewriting, editing and deliberate forgeries of German military and political documents designed to
embarrass the United States and its client, as well as to
elevate the image of their own regime. One of the most
ambitious Soviet productions concerned the writings of Dr. Josef Goebbels. Because handwritten
special paper Goebbels used would have been nearly impossible to successfully fake, the new
Soviet line was that the documents had actually been typed
and then put onto glass negatives. These were hidden
by the Germans in cases where the Soviets were able to “discover” them after
the war. Having altered the
diaries from “several stacked folders” of handwritten material to a box of more easily forged photographs
of typed manuscript, the Russians began to offer their rare,
politically incorrect material to sources in Germany
for sale and publication. German experts universally rejected these productions as completely
1939 CE-1945 CE: HOLOCAUST SAD FACTS —
FAKED WAR BUILT ON LIES & PROPAGANDA ABOUT GAS
CHAMBERS AND 6 MILLION GENOCIDE REFUTED BY 7,061 PAGES OF WW II ALLIED LEADERS — Churchill’s
Second WW II propaganda never mentions
Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish
victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is
a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second
World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Memoirs is
2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which
altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’
of the Jews, or of
million’ Jewish victims of the war.”1941 CE: Stalin’s “Torch-men-Order” #0428 confirmed by
Russia – Declares
partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements
within a swathe of about 40 – 60 km depth from the main
battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population.
With these tactics it was important to leave a few survivors, which would report
the supposed German terror attacks.
This method of warfare was also confirmed by German soldiers
who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms.
4 minute video — MSM AGGRANDIZED
THIS COWARDLY DRUNKEN WARMONGER!
CHURCHILL USED TRICKS TO FORCE WW II – NOW SOROS IS!
TRICKED AND FAKED WW II by David Irving, Famous BRITISH Author
CHURCHILL = REFUSE TO EVEN HEAR
GERMANY’S PEACE OFFER
CHURCHILL = WANTED LONDON BOMBED BY THE GERMANS TO BEGIN WW
MOST LIKELY UNDER ORDERS FROM THE ROTHSCHILDS MAFIA!
1941 CE-1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Hitler had second thoughts about setting up a Jewish Nation State
and sending thousands of Jews to that State to create Jewish
forces & money to use against Germany, but the
Haavara Agreement continued right on into WW II to at least 1942 CE. Hitler wanted
young and healthy Jews
to work for
their food and lodgings in factories and eventually resettle in Western Russia south of Minsk until
after the war finished. Arabs were so concerned by the close
co-operation between the Nazis & Zionists that
they became convinced that Hitler must be a Jew who was just trying to establish a Jewish
East. “Between January 1 1943 and March 3 1943 CE 113,015 Jews were evacuated from the Reich
including Bohemia and Moravia, the new Eastern Territories
and the district of Bialystok to the East
and 8,025 Jews were moved to the Ghetto for the Aged in Theresienstadt.” – The Korherr Report.
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty
The true reason
for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is as an industrial complex which surrounded the
camp – most of it within full view of the interior of
the camp itself. German industry included arms factories,
foundries and mines. They used the prisoners for most of the labour. The largest work camp
was Auschwitz III
It started operations in May 1942 CE and was associated with the synthetic rubber and liquid fuel
plant Buna-Werke owned by IG Farben. Eleven thousand laborers
worked at Monowitz. Seven thousand inmates
worked at various chemical plants. Eight thousand worked in mines. Approximately 40,000 prisoners worked in
labor camps at Auschwitz. Some put the number of prisoners
who worked at Auschwitz at 83,000. It is clear
these prisoners worked for the German war effort in the Auschwitz prison complex. The Monowitz industrial
complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put
to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging
from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing. Auschwitz was the site
most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this
particular field of technology. Shortly after the First World
War the Germans were cut off from their supply of
natural rubber. Auschwitz was picked because it was a railway centre. Auschwitz had a hospital
next door to treat prisoners.
1942 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Far from being the “death camps”
as you have heard so often, places
like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were work camps,
critical to the German war effort. The Jewish workers were
compensated for their labor with scrip printed
specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived
in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz
and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons
camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Many thousands of secret German
dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated after the war by the Allies. But not a single one refers to
a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the familiar
Auschwitz extermination story cannot be reconciled
with the documentary evidence. Evidence shows those unable to work were, a very high percentage
of the Jewish
and were treated in the hospital or clinic. German telex message dated 1943 CE from the chief of the
Labor Allocation department, reported that of 25,000 Jews
held in Auschwitz, only 3,581 or 14% were able to work,
and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates — some 21,500, or about 86% were unable
to work. 1944 CE
“security measures in Auschwitz” by Oswald Pohl, head of the camp system, to Heinrich Himmler
reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire
Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were
hospitalized or disabled and in Auschwitz II camp there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom “approximately
15,000 are unable to work.” This camp II was established
primarily as a camp for Jews who were not able to work,
including the sick and elderly. A Jewish scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton
in his 1988 CE book about the “final solution” that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result
of typhus and other “natural” causes than were
executed. Auschwitz had a Swimming Pool, Soccer Field, Post Office,
Cinema, Hospital, Art Studio & Classes, Dental Office, Six Camp Orchestras,
and a Library with 45,000 books.
The elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz was built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and
Sunday afternoons. 1944 CE there are photos showing a fencing
tournament for prisoners at Auschwitz (note
the sign in the background). Postcards written from Auschwitz still exist and the postman would collect the mail
twice-weekly. Auschwitz was visited monthly by International
Red Cross inspection teams who were allowed
to speak to prisoner representatives alone, in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery,
interruption of mail and parcel delivery, health concerns,
food and ration matters etc.
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Auschwitz Nurses and Doctors provided Medical Care and Special Treatment
to Inmates in sickbays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured.
The camp authorities, and the
garrison physician Dr. Wirths, tried with all conceivable means to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive and healthy.
1943 CE-1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — The Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
was the CIA’s “black propaganda”
branch during WW II. At its peak in late 1944, the OSS employed almost 13,000 men and women.
OSS agent and
says 6,000,000 Jews will be obliterated Wallace R. Deuel, a Chicago-born political scientist who
worked at the American University in Beirut and wrote anti-German
books and advised Walt Disney on anti-German
propaganda cartoons and was OSS special assistant to OSS’s director William J. Donovan. 1954 CE-1968 CE
held numerous senior positions
in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative
at the White House during the Kennedy administration (close
to a future dead president). “The Nazis set out in
the beginning to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not
less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning.” Says the propagandist
Wallace R. Deuel.
1943 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
David Irving said, “As late as August 1943 the head of the (British) PWE
[Psychological Warfare Executive] minuted the Cabinet secretly
that despite the stories they were putting out,
there was not the slightest evidence that such contraptions (tools of genocide) existed.” This attitude
in 1944, when
British Intelligence finally came to believe its own atrocity propaganda, as it was recycled back to them
through the chaos and fury of war.
1944 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — BRITISH MINISTRY OF INFORMATION SAID IN 1944
PROPAGANDA MUST BE CREATED TO DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZI USSR MASSACRES OF 66+
MILLION RUSSIANS – MOSTLY CHRISTIANS – February
29, 1944 CE letter to the BBC & higher members of the
British clergy, from the British Ministry of Information ordered the propaganda buildup
against the Germans.
BBC has begun to play a major role in recycling these lies and propaganda back to their point of
origin in Poland. These broadcasts in effect created a feedback
loop that repeated and gave authority to Polish
rumors, which were then re-injected back into Poland. — The Gas Chambers of Sherlock Holmes by Samuel Crowell
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — British Intelligence decrypted German reports
that 39% of German prisoners were
Jews, 65% Poles and only 3% Russians.
HOLOCAUST FACTS — Picture of the detainees who were left to be freed by the Soviet Army
in January 1945. Again, see for yourself how healthy even
the sick looks. Many children are among
1 minute video
— JEWISH FRENCH PROFESSOR’S VIEWS ON “HOLY-COST! (sic)”
ENDS DEBATE = ONE OF THE BIGGEST
BAMBOOZLES OF ALL TIME! = TRUTH FROM
WHAT ASHKENAZIS CALL A SELF-HATING ASHKENAZI ABOUT THE LIES OF THE HOLY-COST
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACT WITH HOAX
— Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was
allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: “The whole propaganda
which started about
abroad was initiated by us [communist inmates] with the help of our Polish comrades.” (Deutsche
Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July
1945). Thus, it is not surprising to learn that
during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been
orchestrated by communist authorities. — THE HOLOCAUST
The Case For
Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf in 1991 CE.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “Of course, no physical evidence whatsoever was shown to verify the
alleged homicidal gas chambers, despite knowledge of their
existence being denied
single defendant.” —Jason Myers, on the Nuremberg trials of 1946 CE.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human
gas chamber was constructed
in 1946 by Stalin of the Ashkenazi USSR that mass murdered 66+ million Russians, mostly Christians.
1946 CE-Today: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide
poisoning is on record for
any German labor camp. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in the German
labor camps. None of the war generals after the war who wrote
their memoirs made any allusion to human gas
chambers or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group. The Red Cross made normal, routine
visits to Auschwitz during the war, and its published reports
made no allusion to any ongoing
human gassing there. No authentic documents attesting to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — Report of Council on Foreign Relations –
Funded by Rockefeller-Rothschilds
Crime Syndicate — Made up their mind that no “revisionism” was to be encouraged after World
Committee on Studies of the Council on Foreign Relations is concerned that the debunking journalistic
campaign following World War I should not be repeated and
believes that the American public deserves
a clear and competent statement of our basic aims and activities during the second World War.”
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Illegal Jewish immigrants were sprayed by British
as a precaution
carrying lice with large AMOUNTS OF ZYKLON-B USED ALSO AT THE CAMPS.
1948 CE-1949 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume
“Report of the International Committee of the
Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War”.
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps.
They were not allowed to
prisoners in the Ashkenazi run USSR (Russian) camps. The Official International Red Cross Records
of WWII at Arolsen, Germany show Actual prison camp Total
Deaths at 271,301 people. The Bad Arolsen archives
list everyone who lived and died in all the German labor camps. The question naturally arises
as to what is the total
in this tremendous archive. Clearly, the managers of this archive are not at liberty to tell of this
or they would be jailed for so awful a crime, but we know
the FACTS! But fortunately, the Red Cross Report was
a 1650 page detailed report that never mentioned a gas chamber and showed approximately 271,300
dead for all the camps.
HOLOCAUST HOAX — “…most of the memoirs and reports [of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are full of
preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic
effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante
philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
— Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish
Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65.
1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — ANTI-GERMAN HATE SPEECH shows where these motives to LIE AND SPREAD
HATE PROPAGANDA are focused — “Every Jew, somewhere
in his being, should set apart a zone of hate —
healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the
To do otherwise
would be a betrayal of the dead.” — Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time
1979 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “One should not ask, how this mass
murder was made possible. It was
technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research
regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There
is no debate regarding the existence of the gas
chambers, and there can never be one.” — Published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February
21, 1979 CE.
1980 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX —
Diary of Anne Frank was totally debunked by a lawsuit in a German court.
German state forensic bureau examined the original “diary” manuscript
found “significant” portions of the
work were written with a ballpoint pen, but ballpoint pens were not available before 1951. They also found
that none of the “diary” handwriting matched known
examples of Anne’s handwriting, but all of the writing in
the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire “diary”
was a postwar fake. The true author of the
diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in
a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank. But
even more weird is the Diary was Co-Authored by Anne
Franks Father and controlled by SWISS in Basel, Switzerland. All done years after the war.
1982 CE-2001 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “Holocaust
denial” laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term
Jewish campaign. In 1982 CE, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a
London-based agency of the
Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure
governments to outlaw “Holocaust denial.” The
anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several
European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted
its “Holocaust denial” statute in
1985 CE (amended in 1994 CE), France in 1990 CE, Austria in 1992 CE, Belgium in 1995 CE, and Slovakia in
2001 CE. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign,
the International Association of Jewish
Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 CE called for new and more severe laws against “Holocaust denial.”
1991 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf (1964 CE-Today) is an author
and chemist who was amazingly
convicted of the SILLY CHARGE of Holocaust denier. After his military service with the German Air Force, in 1990
CE he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
at Stuttgart, where he prepared a PhD thesis.
In 1991 CE, Rudolf began work on a paper entitled Report on the formation and verifiability of cyanide
compounds in the Auschwitz “gas chambers” and in
1993 CE, this work was reported in the media, and Rudolf
was told not to enter the Max Planck Institute again without permission. When he did so,
his employment was
without notice. OTHER VICTIMS OF HOLY-COST INSANITY include Ernst Zundel, Sylvia Stolz
and Vincent Reynouard.
1985 CE and 1988 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Zundel Trials, a famous court
trial with expert witness
was at a loss when asked: “Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of
gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” —
Zundel’s Defense counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg
in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination. “I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied.
“You are (at a loss) because
you can’t,” Christie said. “The witness countered that there are aerial photographs of concentration
ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal nature
of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the
camps.” During this trial, not a single
eyewitness for the plaintiff could be found. Zundel won and they finally stopped harassing him.
Ernst Zundel, a Canadian, was denied
entry into the United States
and his story is an example of the HOAX EXPOSED
$80 BILLION to $100 BILLION “HOLY-COST” SCAM SINCE WW II AND EVEN BACK
TO 1915 OR BEFORE!
TIME TO GET
THE FACTS OUT AND END THE LIES AND SCAMS!
1995 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison for “inciting racial hatred”
(TELLING THE TRUTH) by the district court of Stuttgart because
of his dissertation research now known as the
“Rudolf Report”. Rudolf avoided prison by fleeing to Spain, England, and finally
to the United States. All the while, criminal investigations
continued in Germany.
1995 CE: KABALISTIC ORIGINS OF
THE SIX MILLION FIGURE — Ben Weintraub’s book, Holocaust Dogma Of
Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic occultism
involved in the number. 6,000,000 as the number
of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the Kabala.
The 6 million number was published
over and over in newspaper as revealed by Ashkenazi Friedman from 1916 CE-Today!
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw
his application for a final PhD
examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. The university said Rudolf used his
academic credentials or knowledge to commit a crime –
Meaning facts about “HOLY-COST!” Rudolf knew
his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but stated that his findings at Auschwitz
shattered his world view” when he found only insignificant traces of cyanide compounds can be found
in the samples taken from Auschwitz.
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “It is necessary to recognize that
the lack of traces involves the inability
to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.” — French
‘historian’ Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien
(Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996 CE, p. 14.
1997 CE-2013 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf began to publish books on Holocaust CHEMICAL FACTS
and founded Castle Hill Publishers in 1997 based in Hastings,
England and was linked to Theses & Dissertations Press
as its American outlet. In 2000, Rudolf initiated an English language Holocaust Handbooks
Series which, as of 2013,
25 titles. Until his arrest in late 2005, he published the now defunct “Quarterly journal for free historical research.”
2000 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “Care must be taken not to give a
platform for deniers… or seek to disprove
the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.” —
‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’
at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000 CE.
HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Holocaust story has served to create a highly profitable business for
large numbers of Jews, something which the honest Jewish
professor Norman Finkelstein described as the
“Holocaust Industry” in his book of the same name (The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation
of Jewish Suffering, Verso Books, 2003). The “Holocaust”
served (and still serves) well in justifying the Zionist
seizure of Palestine. Any criticism of the overt human rights violations and atrocities
committed by the state of Israel against the Palestinians
is dismissed as “anti- Semitism.”
THE OUTRIGHT EMBARRASSMENT OF ISRAELIS AND THEIR EVIL IS TOSSED
BACK AT THEM BY NORMAN FINKELSTEIN, A BRAVE AND HONEST LEADER!
2004 CE-2010 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Germar Rudolf, THE TRUTH TELLER, in district court of Mannheim
grabbed Rudolf’s bank account to rob 55% of Rudolf’s business turnover
from the years 2001-2004, but at
that time the account contained only some €5,000. Rudolf and his associates had earned this money by
selling TRUTH TELLING publications banned in Germany, but
Rudolf’s business was in the UK and the US.
In 2004, Rudolf married a US citizen and settled in Chicago, and they later had a child.
For some reason he
had to apply
for political asylum, or at least for the right not to be expelled, but this was turned down.
In 2005 Immigration Services said that Rudolf did not have
a right to stay with his family and was extradited to
Germany and on arrival was arrested by the police and transferred to a prison in Rottenburg,
then to another in
in Baden-Württemberg. In 2007, the German Court sentenced him to two years and six months in
prison for TELLING THE TRUTH or as the court put it “inciting
hatred, disparaging the dead, and libel.” The German
police confiscated copies of his “Lectures on the Holocaust” and destroyed. In
2009 the TRUTH
was released from prison and now lives in the US with his wife and daughter.
2007 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief
even in people who know very
little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity
shaped by political Zionism, but
for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who
told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools,
and media of every kind. These sources are the
same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about
the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other
dishonesties are they promoting?”
2015 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The
rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s
knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism
is not suddenly going to halt its advance or
return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical
and scientific level – click link:
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “If the Holocaust were
unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on
this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this is the only historical topic
that is regulated by penal
is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider this topic to be the most important issue to keep
under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing
powers are the real criminals—not the historical
dissidents they send to prison.” – Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can and Will
Destroy the Holocaust Establishment,
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The
rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s
knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism
is not suddenly going to halt its advance
or return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson. When we ask detailed and pointed questions, our
They don’t really know when, where, or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how
it was possible. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly
held thousands of bodies. And they refuse to
even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. The ‘Holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily
That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted and even put in prison. Truth needs no
protection from scrutiny, but lies do.
2017 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The three victor nations, Russia, America
and Britain, collaborated together
at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high
ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two
million tons of bombs. People were loath to
believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American
intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience.
Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was
the original WMD hoax.” – Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality.
Today CE: ASHKEANAZI FACTS — We know Ashkenazis are the Masters of Make-Believe to make the world
believe in Death Camps. They now infest Hollywood with the
fakery and lies continually spewing out falsehoods
to gain sympathy for a group of ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE CRIMINALS attacking Americans
Europeans with their propaganda
and outright lies. Today’s Hollywood Ashkenazis are the heirs of the
original crop of wartime Hollywood producers and directors
who were called into service by the U.S. Army to “document”
(PROPAGANDIZE) the concentration camps.
WESTERN LABOR CAMPS vs EASTERN DEATH CAMPS
For the past 20 years or so, it has been fun to watch how
the ever-evolving field of "Holocaust Studies"
adjusts to new discoveries which contradict the original narrative. For example, when it became
apparent that there wasn't actually any documentation to support
the Holohoax, the Holohoaxers
their 50 year old mantra of "It's well documented!", and seamlessly transitioned to:
"The Germans destroyed the documents" mode.
Another addition to Holocaustianity
is the distinction that is now made between "work camps"
and "extermination camps." You
see, as pathetic and self-abasing as modern day German guilt-trippers
are, they still aren't going to say that a certain German-based camp, Dachau
for example, had
homicidal gas chambers when it didn't; or
that "millions" died there when they didn't. The fact
that the West, in spite of its intellectual tyranny, was still much more open and free that the old
Soviet bloc, began to complicate things for the Holohoaxers. For that reason, all of internment
camps which were located in the West are now described as "work camps"
of those located
in Poland and Ukraine have been classified as "extermination camps."
The chart below was copied from 'The
Jewish Virtual Library " -- which pulled the information
the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps"
red) are said to have been located:
|Treblinka || |
see that? Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one in Ukraine; but zero
in either of the western states Germany, France or the Netherlands.
That's a very
Why the east-west divide between "work" and "extermination"?
dear reader, elementary. If you know anything at all about World War II and the
subsequent birth of "The Iron Curtain", you know that no western researchers, no aid workers,
no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human
rights activists, no investigative
researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to
poke around in Joe Stalin's
Communist post-war front yard of Poland or Ukraine. Therein lies the rub! Hence,
Holohoaxers, both then and now, can make any claim
they want to in regard to what took place in
air-tight closed east.
In 1945, it was essential for the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation
camps" mainly in Stalin's
Poland & Ukraine.
Seventy years later, it is essential the Holohoaxers
to keep the "annihilation
camps" completely in Poland & Ukraine. By
now, the Stalinist tales of "gas chambers" and
"millions dead" have become ossified. The modern-day Poles and Russians have no interest in rocking
this leaky boat because theyweren't the ones falsely accused.
The Bottom Line:
Belief in the purely eastern-front "extermination" Holohoax necessarily
requires blind faith in the press releases of Joe Stalin and his propaganda
henchmen, as well as claims about the eastern camps which could never be verified!
"We would never lie to you. Trust us."
Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1, Jews for Hitler...
View the REAL PLAN for a massive HOLOCAUST perpetrated by JEWS titled EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (Part 5)...
used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work
The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 7-9.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA.
By Jennifer White, administrative director of TBR;
Far from being the "death
camps" as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz,
Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were
work camps, critical to the German war effort. But did you know that the Jewish
workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their
use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was
conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau
and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies
after World War II. Here is the story of the money the court historians do not
you to even suspect existed.
Piles of incinerated corpses were indicting images at Nuremberg,
used to prove that
the German-run concentration camps during World War II were
intended for purposes of
exterminating the Jews of Europe. However, a plethora
of documentary evidence, long
suppressed, shows that prisoners were relatively
well-treated, compensated for their
hard work and allowed to purchase luxuries
to which even the German public did not have
ready access. This is not the image
of abject deprivation that the Holocaust lobby
would like you to entertain.
irrefutable proof is the existence of a means of exchange for goods and services:
There were at least 134 separate issues, in different denominations and styles,
such notorious places as Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Oranienburg, Ravensbrück,
Westerbork and at least 15 other camps. (See Paper Money of the World Part I:
Modern Issues of Europe by Arnold Keller, Ph.D., 1956, pp. 23-25 for a complete listing.)
A monetary system was also in existence in the ghettos, most
notably Theresienstadt and Lodz,
which produced beautiful notes (veritable works
of art) that make U.S. currency look dull.
are numerous dealers in rare currency and numismatics who specialize in selling
"concentration camp money" or "Holocaust money" as it has been sometimes called.
But the very fact of its existence does not seem to have raised questions - as it should have
- about what really did (and did not) happen inside the so-called
camps" where the Holocaust scrip was circulating in the first place.
This scrip was not negotiable outside of the camp for which it was issued. This decreased
the chance of a successful escape and made it impossible for the general public to purchase
some of the rare luxuries available in the camps. According to Albert Pick in
Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945:
Inmates were not paid for the work but were given "coupons" now
and then to
buy things in the "Kantine".... As the war progressed badly and the number
workers declined, the KZ worker potential became important. Offers of "premiums"
and other advantages
were made to the inmates, tobacco was offered and even
visits to bordellos.... In order that these scrips could
be used outside the camps, special money was printed.
Letter from Prisoner No. 11647 Block 28/3 Dachau KIII on
8, 1940 to his relative in Litzmannstadt (Lodz):
I must write you something about myself. I am very well. In the canteen I buy
cookies, fruit and other food. If you worry about me, you'll
indeed be committing a sin. I have more reason to worry
about you.... (Letters
from the Doomed: Concentration Camp Correspondence 1940-1945, Richard
There was a payment schedule at Theresienstadt
utilizing Th. kr. (Theresienstadt kroner)
as the unit of exchange. (The Shekel
Vol. XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983 p. 29). The breakdown looked like this:
Working men, according to their jobs: 105-205 Th. kr.
Working women, according
to their jobs: 95-205 Th. kr.
Part-time workers: 80 Th. kr.
Caretakers: 70 Th. kr.
War-wounded and holders
of the Iron Cross,
First Class degree or higher: 195 Th. kr.
Prominente (doctors, professors,
cultural artists and politicians): 145 Th. kr.
To put this in perspective, a cup of coffee cost 2 Th. kr. The circulation in Theresienstadt
was such that it was necessary to print over 5 million notes. See Papirove
Penize Na Uzemi
Ceskoslovenska 1762-1975, Second Edition, 1975,
Hradek Kralove, trans. by Julius Sem, pp. 134-135.
The first worker's camp to have its own scrip was Oranienburg. Before using the camp scrip
they used German currency in nearby towns, but the authorities decided to centralize.
Currency was exchanged for camp money, less 30%. (The Shekel, Vol XVI, No. 2, March-April
1983, p. 40: "Concentration Camp Money of the Nazi Holocaust" by Steven Feller.)
Similarly at Buchenwald:
Each prisoner was allowed
up to 10 marks per week to be used for the purchase
of cigarettes at the camp canteen, other canteen purchases,
brothel visits, or
credit to a savings account. The regulations went on to specify that a visit to a
would cost 2 marks for which 1.5 marks would be kept by
the SS and 0.5 marks would be used for "expenses."
(Ibid., p. 41.)
Was there a similar situation
at all of the other camps - at least those that issued currency?
As this includes
Auschwitz, it would be shocking indeed to even consider marmalade and
being purchased in this "death camp." Even the existence of money in camps gives
us a look at what life was really like there, yet this information has yet to make it
to the History Channel.
American Israel Numismatic Association
Pick, Albert. Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und
D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945, Munich, Battenberg Publishers, 1976.
Michael H., Das Papiergeld im besetzten Deutschland 1945-1949, Regenstauf: Gietl, 1994.
Stahl, Zvi, Jewish Ghettos and Concentration Camps' Money, 1933-1945, London: D. Richman Books, 1990.
Campbell, Lance K., Dachau concentration camp scrip, Margate, Florida: American Israel Numismatic
The Numismatist, April 1981, by Steven Feller.
Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine, 1965, 1996, "POW Money and Medals" by Slabaugh,
Schultze, Manfred, Unsere Arbeit - unsere Hoffnung: Das Ghetto
in Lodz 1940-1945, Schwalmtal: Phil-Creativ, 1995.
Sem, Julius, Standard
Catalog of World Paper Money, 1977 (Theresienstadt notes).
Vol. I, No. 2, Oct. 1976. Yasha L. Beresiner.
Click on this text to watch a six minute video titled: Hard Facts Of The Holocaust Lies...
Click on this text to examine the enhanced HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE...
“New Pages” of Anne Frank Diary Prove
that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book
discovered” pages from the “Diary of Anne Frank” — which supposedly
contain risqué jokes — are in fact further proof that the book attributed to the Jewish
teenager was in fact written by her father — because the “hidden” writing is,
like most of the rest of the “diary,” in her father Otto Frank’s handwriting.
(The New Observer)
The “newly-discovered” pages were announced
at a press conference at the “Anne Frank House”
museum in Amsterdam, where researchers
apparently were able to remove two brown
paper pasted pages and “read” the obscured
writing underneath using lamps and optical
character recognition technology.
The compliant Jewish lobby controlled media focused all its attention on the contents
the “new pages,” but ignored the obvious fact of the difference in handwriting
the new pages, with the “new material” all in her father’s handwriting,
which contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself.
In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war,
and who then passed it off as “real” in order to sell it as a “holocaust memoir.”
The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times that year, when the copyright
holders to the diary admitted Otto Frank’s involvement in an attempt to extend their
control of the manuscript.
As the New York Times pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s
red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly
contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.”
Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne
died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public
domain in February 2015.
But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to
try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period—by
that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.
The implications of this admission are obvious. As the New York Times put it:
While the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled
its intentions a year ago,
warnings about the change have provoked
a furor as the deadline approaches. Some
people opposed to the move
have declared that they would defy the foundation
and publish portions
of her text.
Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès Tricoire,
a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights
in France, where critics
have been the most vociferous and are organizing
a challenge. “If you follow their
arguments, it means that
they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.”
The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed
to be “Anne Frank’s diary”
was in fact written by her father after the war—a
fact which also explains the use of ball
point pen in the “diary,” a writing device
which only became available after 1945.
Click on this text to examine the Anne Frank Fraud.
The Secular Religion of the 'HOLOCAUST'
religion of "the Holocaust" is a secular one: it belongs to the lay world; it is profane;
in actuality, it has at its disposal the secular arm, that is
a temporal authority with dreaded power.
It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets and its high priests. As one
revisionist has observed, it has its circle of saints, male and female, amongst whom,
example, Saint Anne (Frank), Saint
Simon (Wiesenthal) and Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy
places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (and macabre) buildings and its relics
Click on this text to meet URSULA HAVERBECK who will spend her 91st Birthday in a German prison for questioning the holocaust
Click on this text to examine PEOPLE EXPOSING THE HOLOCAUST LIES...
Click on this text to watch JIM RIZOLI - HOLO-FACTS
Click on this text to examine an actual holocaust perpetrated by JEWS upon the Ukrainians.
Allied Attacks Killed Thousands
of Camp Inmates: The 1945 'Cap Arcona' and 'Thielbek' Sinkings
prisoners of German wartime concentration camps who perished while in German custody
are routinely regarded as "victims of Nazism" -- even if they lost their
lives as direct or
indirect result of
Allied policy ... Among the German concentration camp prisoners who perished
at Allied hands were some 7,000 inmates who were killed during the war's final week
were being evacuated in three
large German ships that were attacked by British war
planes. This little-known tragedy is one of history's greatest maritime disasters.
Auschwitz Chemistry: How Science Proves The ‘Final Solution’
Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives
“Gassing Clothing”. Left: Healthy inmates at work sterilizing clothing.
Right: Healthy prisoners at Auschwitz
working in oneof the larger clothing disinfestation chambers in the camp.
Above: The Auschwitz camp employed
a number of delousing stations, which used steam and Zyklon-B to kill lice in
prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave number 2, seen from the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing
on hangers attached to a trolley and pushed inside the chamber.
Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was
the chamber on two short rails. The disinfection stations were constructed with double doors so that the
infected and cleaned clothes would not be mixed together. This picture was taken while
the camp was operational.
Source: Peter Winter, Chapter 10- Auschwitz
The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau
Defenders of the Holocaust story have attempted to discredit scientific
reports which disprove the existence of homicidal
gas chambers at German camps
during World War II. For example, Deborah Lipstadt’s defense attorney, Richard Rampton,
referred in court to The Leuchter Report as “…a piece of so-called research which
is not worth the paper it is written on…”
Dr. Richard Green states about
to the fact that he actually has some understanding of chemistry, many of his deceptions are more sophisticated
than other Holocaust deniers…Ultimately, he engages in the same deceptions and specious arguments as [Fred]
and [Walter] Lüftl , but the case he makes for those deceptions and arguments
involves more difficult chemistry.”
This article will discuss
attempts by chemists to discredit scientific reports which disprove
of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau during World War II.
In 1988, the Canadian government put Ernst Zündel on trial a second time for
the criminal offense of knowingly disseminating
false news about “the Holocaust.”
As part of his defense in this trial, Zündel commissioned the American gas-chamber
expert Fred Leuchter to make a scientific examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau
and Majdanek. The resulting Leuchter Report is the first scientific
study of the alleged German homicidal gas chambers.
In addition to reporting that
the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were structurally
unsuitable for gassing, Leuchter researched the chemical properties of the Zyklon B fumigant. Leuchter found that
is a highly toxic compound that releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas.
The released hydrogen cyanide gas clings to
surfaces and reacts chemically
with materials containing iron, forming ferrocyanide compounds that have a distinctive blue
color called Prussian Blue. Since building materials normally contain a certain amount of rust (iron oxide, usually
one and four percent), repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas would
result in Prussian Blue staining on the walls
of the alleged gas chambers.
Leuchter took forensic samples
from the alleged gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing
facility at Birkenau. The samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory
no significant ferrocyanide compound traces in the samples taken from the
alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the
sample from a wall of the Birkenau delousing
facility had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter
that this result would be impossible if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to
hydrogen cyanide gas.
Germar Rudolf, a certified
chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by writing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992.
The Rudolf Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused
on engineering and chemical aspects
of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at
Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all
of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated
with Prussian Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls
and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing
facilities have Prussian Blue
staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas
at Auschwitz and Birkenau.
also took samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau.
Similar to Leuchter’s samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant
traces of ferrocyanide residue
on the same order of magnitude found in any other
building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all
showed very high
ferrocyanide residues. Rudolf determined that, if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had
taken place in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit
ferrocyanide residue as the delousing chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded
that mass gassings
with Zyklon B did not occur in the alleged homicidal gas
chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.
Kraków Institute of Forensic Research
The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994
that attempted to refute the Leuchter Report.
The team from this
forensic institute led by Dr. Jan Markiewicz claims not to have understood how it was possible for
Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas. The researchers
excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron cyanide compounds from their
analyses, resulting in much lower cyanide traces
for the delousing chambers.
Their analysis made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed
to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a cyanide residue of close to zero. The Kraków
concluded from their analysis that since the gas chambers and delousing
had the same amount of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in
the gas chambers.
gave the Kraków researchers irrefutable proof that Prussian Blue can be formed in walls exposed to
hydrogen cyanide gas, citing a case document in expert literature. The authors of the Kraków
report refused to change their report and
admit they made a mistake. Rudolf writes:
The only ‘scientific’ attempt to refute Frederick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis turns out
to be one of the
biggest scientific frauds of the 20th century. How desperate must they be—those
who try to defend the established
version of the Holocaust, i.e., the alleged systematic extermination
of Jews in
homicidal ‘gas chambers’, that they resort to such obviously fraudulent
British science historian
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom also refuted the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research
report, as succinctly summarized by the retired professor of the philosophy of science Dr. James H. Fetzer:
When the Auschwitz museum
was confronted with the fact that the innocuous delousing chambers at Auschwitz
blue walls–due to being saturated with blue iron cyanide compounds–but the alleged homicidal gas chambers
have not, they commissioned their own chemical research. Instead of testing wall samples for the
that had caused the blue stains, the researchers they commissioned simply excluded those
chemicals from their
analysis by employing a procedure that could not detect them. They justified
this measure with the claim that
they did not understand exactly how these compounds could form
and that they might therefore be mere artifacts.
Researchers who don’t understand what
they are investigating have no business becoming involved. In this case,
however, it appears
to be deliberate. They have deliberately ignored an obvious explanation–that Zyklon B was only
used for delousing–which would have remedied their lack of comprehension. As a result of this failure to
adhere to the principles of science, they produced a report of no scientific value, which they used to arrive at
Dr. Arthur Robert Butz
writes in regard to the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:
The argument, to the extent that it was intelligible enough to be
summarized at all, was that they did not understand
how the iron-cyanide compounds got to be
there, so they decided to ignore them in reaching their conclusions.
I don’t understand
how the moon got there, so I will ignore all effects associated with it, such as tides. I hope I don’t drown.”
Read Previous Article:
Wear’s War Movie Review: “Mr Death” An Epic Propaganda Stuff Up & The Jewish Panic To Remedy It
Dr. James Roth
Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received
samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as
an Analytical Chemist at Alpha
Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide
content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron
and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply in porous materials such as brick and iron.
Dr. Roth later changed his
testimony in a documentary movie titled
Mr. Deathproduced by Errol
Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:
Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100
in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000
times. If you’re going to go
looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface
only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
writes that Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death are wrong:
The 1999 film about Leuchter features an interview with
the chemist [Dr. James Roth] who had done the analysis
of his wall-samples back in 1988. He
had done this “blind,” i.e. with no knowledge of where they had come from,
was correct scientific procedure. During the second Zündel trial in Toronto in 1988 he testified under oath
concerning the method used and what Leuchter had sent him. He said back then that hydrogen cyanide can easily
penetrate into brick and mortar. But then, when he was interviewed again by Morris for his documentary, he
suddenly stated that the results were quite meaningless, because the cyanide could only have soaked a few microns
into the brickwork. Wow, that was quite a whopper. Mortar and brickwork are highly porous to hydrogen cyanide,
obviously so because the delousing chambers were more or less equally blue inside and out, it
had soaked right through.
But you can watch him on video explaining this, as if he were confusing
brick and mortar with rock. The latter will only
absorb cyanide to a few microns of its surface.
Germar Rudolf writes in
regard to Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death:
be shown that Prof. Dr. James Roth is wrong for the following reasons:
- It is a fact that the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Auschwitz,
Birkenau, Stutthof, and Majdanek are saturated
- with cyanide compounds, and this not only
superficially, but into the depth of the masonry, as I have demonstrated
- by taking samples
from different depths of the wall. Compare in this regard my mortar and plaster Sample Pairs
& 11, 12 & 13, 19a & b…, which were each taken at the same spot but at different depths, as well as Sample
- taken from below the overlying lime plaster (which is thus similar to 19b). These
values prove that hydrogen cyanide
- can rather easily reach deep layers of plaster and
mortar. But even the other samples taken from the surface prove
- that Prof. Roth’s
allegation is wrong: Provided that most of the cyanide detectable today is present in the form of
cyanide (Iron Blue and other cyanoferrates), as Prof. Roth assumes himself, his thesis would mean that 10% to
- 75% of the iron content of these samples are located in the upper 10 micrometers thin layer of the samples (0.010
- i.e., they are located in less than 1% of the entire sample mass. The
rest of the samples, however, would have been
- massively deprived of iron. How this migration
of a major portion of iron to a thin surface
- layer would have happened is inexplicable
to me. Fact is that this simply could not happen.
expert literature is detailed about the following:
- Hydrogen cyanide is an extremely mobile chemical compound with physical properties comparable to water…
- Water vapor can quite easily penetrate masonry material, and thus also hydrogen
- Hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate thick,
porous layers like walls…
- In addition,
it is generally known that cement and lime mortar are highly porous materials, comparable for instance
- to sponges. In such materials, there does not exist anything like a defined layer of 0.01 mm beyond which
- cyanide could not diffuse, as there can also be no reason, why water could
not penetrate a sponge deeper than a millimeter.
- Steam, for example, which behaves physically
comparable to hydrogen cyanide, can very easily penetrate walls.
- Finally, the massive discolorations of the outside of the walls of the disinfestation chambers
in Birkenau and Stutthof,
- as shown in this expert report, are clearly visible and conclusive
evidence for the fact of
- how easily hydrogen cyanide and its soluble derivatives can
and do penetrate such walls.
As a professor of analytical chemistry, Prof. Roth must know this, so one can only wonder why he spreads such outrageous
nonsense. That Prof. Roth is indeed a competent chemist can be seen from what he said during
his testimony under oath
as an expert witness during the above mentioned Zündel
trial..: ‘In porous materials such as brick or mortar, the Prussian blue
[hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open, but as the Prussian
blue formed, it was possible that it would seal the porous material and stop the penetration.’
…It is also revealing that Prof. Roth
mentioned during this interview that, if he had known where Leuchter’s samples
from, his analytical results would have been different. Does that mean that Prof. Roth manipulates his result
according to whether or not he likes the origin of certain samples? Such an attitude is exactly
the reason why one should
never tell an ‘independent’ laboratory
about the origin of the samples to be analyzed, simply because ‘independence’ is
a very flexible term when it comes to controversial topics. What Prof. Dr. Roth has demonstrated here is only his
lack of professional honesty.”
Dr. Richard Green
Dr. Richard Green, who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Stanford University, agrees
with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue
found in the delousing chambers is
the result of gassings with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible
explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers having blue staining. Green writes: “…the
discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider
what possible processes
could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers.
For example, is it possible that materials that had been
soaked with aqueous
solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is
premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes
that took place within those buildings.”
Dr. Green’s speculation
is absurd. Why would the Germans lean materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions
of HCN against the outside walls of the delousing chambers? Dr. Green is desperate to find an
alternative reason for the heavy blue staining on the outside walls of the delousing chambers.
Germar Rudolf writes in regard
to Dr. Green’s speculation:
One major rule of science is that it is impermissible to immunize a theory against refutation, here in particular
inventing untenable auxiliary hypotheses to shore up an otherwise shaky thesis…This
is exactly what Dr. Green
is doing: coming up with a ludicrous attempt at explaining a fact
which does not
fit into his theory. Yet instead of fixing his theory, he tries to bend reality.”
Dr. Green also challenges
the possibility of formation of any noticeable quantities of Prussian Blue in the alleged homicidal
gas chambers. Dr. Green writes: “The difference in total cyanides (Prussian blue + non-Prussian blue) owes
to the fact
that Prussian blue formed efficiently in the case of the delousing
chambers but not in the homicidal gas chambers, and Prussian
blue once formed
is likely to remain.”
Dr. Green is not able to provide
any convincing evidence why Prussian Blue would not form efficiently in the homicidal
gas chambers. For example, Dr. Green states that masonry in the alleged homicidal gas chambers has a neutral pH
value which does not allow for the formation of cyanide salts. Germar Rudolf writes: “But
if that were true,
how come huge amounts of cyanides did accumulate in the walls
of the disinfestation chambers?”
Rudolf has documented with
expert literature on the chemistry of building materials that the cement mortars and concretes
used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers are noticeably alkaline for many weeks, months, or even years. These
would have been very much inclined to accumulate cyanide salts and to form
Prussian Blue, even more so than the lime
plaster of the disinfestation chambers.
The alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau could not have been used to exterminate
thousands of people as described in pro-Holocaust literature for
numerous reasons: 1) they did not have escape-proof
doors and windows; 2) they
did not have panic-proof equipment; 3) they did not have technically gastight doors and shutters;
4) they had no provision to quickly release and distribute the poison gas; and 5) they had no effective
device to ventilate or otherwise render ineffective the poison gas after the execution.
By contrast, Germany built
highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice
and save inmate lives. By one estimate, the SS at Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to
bring the typhus
epidemics raging there under control. An enormous amount of information exists concerning these German
facilities, but no similar information exists regarding the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
The roof of the semi-underground
Morgue #1 of Crematorium II at Birkenau, which is said to have been the building’s
homicidal gas chamber, remains intact to some degree today. Contrary to eyewitness testimony, that roof has no
Zyklon-B-introduction holes. This has been acknowledged by pro-Holocaust researcher
Robert Jan van Pelt. Since it is
impossible to close holes measuring 70 x 70
cm from a concrete roof without leaving clearly visible traces, it is certain
no Zyklon-B-introduction holes ever existed at Crematorium II. Consequently, Zyklon B could not
have been introduced through the roof at this morgue as alleged by pro-Holocaust supporters.
As documented in this article,
chemists adhering to the orthodox Holocaust narrative have failed to explain why the walls
of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz/ Birkenau are permeated with Prussian Blue, while nothing of this sort
observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers. The only reasonable
explanation is that Zyklon B
was never used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers
at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes:
…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp
let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’thappen.”
 Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz:
From the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 137, 435.
 Richard J. Green, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998,
 Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust:
The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and
Press, 2000, p. 337. See the currently available edition of Leuchter’s report: Fred A. Leuchter,
Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition, 4th ed.,
Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2015.
 Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,”
The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 7.
 Leuchter, Fred A., “The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why,”
Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 138-139.