HOME PAGEINFO PRIMER BOOK9/11 TRUTH PRIMERHOLOCAUST DeprogramJews Genociding WhitesHIDDEN HISTORY CourseJew Influence RevealedExposing JEW TyrannyJEW GUN CONTROLBen Freedman SpeechA JEW EXPOSES ISRAELJewish History & ReligionTALMUD REVEALEDShame The Devil (book)Jew USA EXPLOITATIONCommunism Is JudaismIron Curtain Over AmericaJoe McCarthy Was RightHENRY FORD'S WarningGrace Halsell on IsraelWHAT IS ZIONISM?ZIONIST Plan HistoryProtocols Of ZionZIONIST JEW OrganizationsChristian Zionism IdiocyANTI ZIONIST LEAGUENAME THE JEWBOYCOTT ISRAELODED YINON PLANRabbi DOV ZAKHEIM 9/11Murderer Silverstein 9/119/11 Pentagon InfestationDONALD RUMSFELD 911WTC Jew Art Students 9/11Ptech 9/11WTC BUILDING 7 - 9/11WTC Building 6 Vault 9/11DICK CHENEY 9/11BUSH'S Farcical 9/11 RoleDr. Jones 9/11 THERMATE9/11 Commission Fraud9/11 Traitors - SuspectsCHRIS BOLLYN 911 TruthA & E For 9/11 TRUTHPILOTS for 9/11 TRUTHGen. Stubblebine on 9/119/11 Further ReadingPATRIOT ACT HacksFALSE FLAG OPSUSS LIBERTY Truth-FactsLBJ Blackmailed-BribedJews Genocided RussiansRussia and The JewsRUSSIA INSIDERJews Genocided UkrainiansJews Genocided ArmeniansAnti-JWO OrganizationsJEW LOBBY A LISTAIPAC POWERWhat is Chabad?JEW-MASON OrganizationFrankfurt School JewsTHE ANTI HUMANSJEW MEDIA CONTROLJew Hollywood-TV ControlBERNAYS PROPAGANDACIRCUMCISION FRAUDJEW Porn IndustryISRAEL SPIES ON USAWHITE HOUSE CONTROLTRUMP IS A CON MANRahm Emanuel TraitorHouse Of RothschildEdmond de RothschildBalfour DeclarationAID WASTED ON ISRAELSOROS the Errand BoyLondon Crown CorporationThe USA CORPORATIONFederal Reserve BankI.R.S. THE FACTSBANKSTERSBANKER'S WARSIsrael's Samson OptionWAR IS A RACKETSilent Weapons Quiet WarsIsrael's Third World WarsBILDERBERGERS 2018Zionist Crimes HistoryTHE Confederate JEWJews and SlaveryCromwell and the JEWSJews and the MobKILLING KENNEDYSJew Assassiation MonoplyJames Forrestal MurderedNixon's Jew ProblemJames Traficant KnewJOHN Songbird McCAINJew-American TraitorsWhat's Said About JEWSMartin Luther on JEWSEINSTEIN was a FraudJimmy Carter on PalestineRemember Rachel CorrieJEWS & THE NAACPJews & ADL - ACLU - SPLCORWELL and HUXLEY (books)Great Sedition Trial 1944Robert E. EdmondsonELZABETH DILLING (books)FATHER COUGHLINSIR OSWALD MOSLEYEzra PoundREVILO P. OLIVERSpanish-American WarSpanish Civil WarWW I Hidden HistoryTreaty of VersailleLINDBERGH and DISNEYWorld War II TRUTHTHE NAMELESS WAR (book)Wears War On WWII LiesTHE BAD WAR (WWII)PEARL HARBOR TRUTHMcCollum MemoRainbow 5 War PlanNAZI WORD ORIGINSWASTIKA HISTORYGerman American BundJUSTICE FOR GERMANSGreatest Story Never ToldHitler The ArtistHitler's SpeechsHitler-Churchill DebateWINSTON CHURCHILLMEIN KAMPF (book)Hitler's SECOND BOOKHitler Not A RothschildHitler Defied The BankersHitler Peace RejectedHitler's War DeclarationWhy Hitler InvadedDunkirk TruthMyth of German Villiany (book)Nur für DeutscheWAFFEN SS StoryFRENCH SS Division ETC.German Soldiers SpeakJUSTICE FOR GERMANYWhy Were Germans AngryDer Giftpilz (Book)Germany Must Perish (book)Israel Must Perish (book)Krystallnacht 1938D-DAY JUNE 6, 1944HELLSTORMDRESDEN HOLOCAUSTEisenhower Death CampsOTHER LOSSES (books)Looting & Rape of GermanyPost War StarvationGerman ExpulsionsNuremberg Trials FarcePATTON'S MURDERWWII Explained in QuotesTRANSFER AGREEMENTJEWISH EXPULSIONSHOLOCAUST DENIALUnz HOLOCAUST DENIALTHE HOLOCAUST LIESHOLOCAUST LIES SitesANNE FRANK FRAUDAUSCHWITZAuschwitz CommandantDachau Med ExperimentsThe Mengele MythRemember Ernst ZundelMeet Fred LeuchterMeet David IrvingMeet Robert FaurissonMeet Germar RudolfFree Ursula HaverbeckFree Alfred SchaeferWir Sind Monika SchaeferMeet Joe & Jim RizoliCODOH Holocaust DebateTruNews - Rick WilesDr. Kevin MacDonaldLASHA DARKMOON SiteJohn Kaminski siteDr. David Duke SiteSTORMFRONT SiteHISTORY REVIEWEDInst. Historical ReviewJEW WATCH SiteIF AMERICANS KNEWDr. Chuck BaldwinBrother NathanaelWAKE UP NEW ZEALANDTomatoBubbleRenegade BroadcastingKevin Alfred Strom siteFuhrerious 88 SiteBitChute.Com - VideosGeorge Lincoln RockwellDr. William PierceCarolyn YeagerPATRICK LITTLEINFO ABOUT JEWSSearch For Truth U.K.THE CORBETT REPORTMOSSAD WATCHPaul Craig Roberts - IPERENEGADE TRIBUNEBIBLE RAYSChristogena ProjectSTOP THE CRIME SITESERENDIPITY SITEWINTER WATCHJEW WORLD ORDERKen O'Keefe Speaks OutVOICE OF EUROPETHIS IS EUROPANo Time For SilenceINCONVENIENT HISTORYVIDEO REBEL'S BLOGCitizens American PartyEuroFolkRadio.comNWO OBSERVERMORE LINKSMore Recommended SitesA MEME COLLECTIONA Letter To Americans




Many ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. 

The following is the response I give, to those who will listen:

Excuse me, but I don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?


I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer and historian, Aleksandr

Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience of the 20th Century”; who served eight

long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in

the year 2000 entitled “Together For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66

million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number

of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured,

raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in

the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik

“Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps.


I freely acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust

of the non-military city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on

1.2 million helpless people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column

of Flame”, where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade,

and in which approximately 500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers,

random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered

by concussion and fire in a single night.


I absolutely recognize that more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than

the estimated total of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts,

the senseless, wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic

attacks upon the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.


I openly avow the virtually forgotten Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the

Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the

freezing waters of the Baltic Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945,

as it carried, besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the

Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women and

children – who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army,

and where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster

in maritime history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic.


And I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total

of 271,304 people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps,

combined, by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus

epidemics and starvation caused by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply

routes and centers all over Germany that made it impossible to transport

food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and civilians alike.



I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants

who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care, and

purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under

the supervision of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor

concentration camp this side of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the

wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of

women and children as the communist Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge”

upon the defeated Germans.


I do not deny the Holocaust suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed

USS Liberty surveillance ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine

gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174,

in an attempted false flag operation which was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard,

in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was

only foiled by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator

to successfully get off a call for help.


And I do not deny the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as a result

of the false flag attack on the World Trade Center in New York which was engineered and

perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their pre-planned “Clash of Civilizations”

which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn enemies, the Christians, and the Muslims,

to forget their historical religious commonalities, and annihilate one another in the yet to be

the greatest Holocaust in history – a third world war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the

sidelines… and direct… and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as

even more untold millions of innocents die.


I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002, where

Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in a cruel,

indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and

which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town, and killing unknown hundreds

of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier,

similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known

that at least 800 Palestinians were killed.


Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign

nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression that,

from 2003 to the present, has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men,

women, and children, and brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s

ongoing war of terror, which they have the unmitigated gall to present to the

world as a war “ON” terror… for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.


while I’m at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators

of the above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either

directly, or indirectly committing numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over

many millenia, even since ancient Biblical times – from the slaughter of the Midianites to the

African slave trade – a number of which being the basis of, and celebrated during various

Jewish holidays. And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either.


What I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all

that ANY Jews at all – much less “six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings,

or as a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated

against Jews by Germany’s Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence

or “proof” that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war

anti-German propaganda… because none, from either then or now, actually exists.


So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal

“Holocaust”, and not only the ones from the past, but one that is happening right NOW,

in the present, all you need to do is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your

collectively ignorant rear ends, and look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The West

Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic

Jews are feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew,

who stands in their way in their quest to build their racist,

supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz Israel.


And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to

the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters is one that is purported

to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier”

is one of the most laughable, and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet

seen anywhere… even as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove

your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous charge you make.





Click on this text to watch David Cole in Auschwitz (Full Documentary) The Holohoax aka Shoah

 David Cole's 1992 visit to Auschwitz and his interview with Auschwitz museum curator
Dr. Francicek Piper. During that interview Piper admits that the alleged homicidal gas
chamber was reconstructed from a bomb shelter by the Soviets after the war and that the
number of deaths at Auschwitz during the years when the supposed gassings occurred
was 69,000 according to released Soviet documents after the war. Most of
those deaths were from natural causes and only a minority were Jews.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. This film has everything in it. Since Cole was an
orthodox Jew, the museum authorities thought he was onside and freely admitted everything.

As you will see in the Cole video, the holy gas chamber is a fake. Which makes the entire
Holocaust story a fake. You can study it for a day or for a lifetime and your conclusion will
be the same. There was never a plan for exterminating Jews and there was never an
instrument. As Professor Robert Faurisson has asked for years, “Show me a gas chamber.
Draw for me a gas chamber.” It can’t be done because there was never such a thing.
! ! Holocaust denial laws the greatest proof.jpg






Dear Mr. Spielberg,


I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent. I saw you on TV in France. You declared that you would pour

out Shoa propaganda in German schools. You mentioned that witnesses would be convinced for good, as to the reality

of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers). I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years

of study of the historical problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts.


Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them, our congeners have been compelled to make disgusting

politicians enact Stalino – Orwellian laws which forbid to mention anything concerning the

dogma of the “six-million-gas-chambers”, definitively reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy.


In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth, you suffer the penalty of fines or prison or both. Professor

Faurisson, who has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been practically massacred. This is utterly ridiculous,

but give the Police and the Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century!


These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude.

No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 million Jews slaughtered. You will not find ONE witness of Zyclon-B – gas

chamber’s to exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria.

See my “Shoa Sherlockholmized” herewith: it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject.


The “6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense.


As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a

disgraceful shame. No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true

and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and

pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do.


It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical

impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation.

Many others died but as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler

was allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed,

before the functioning of German armament factories!).


Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY MUST PERISH?

We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish,

from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans

and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000

German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a quite famous book was published a few years ago, but is

ignored to day). You will find there included in French the text of a rabbi: “A rabbi pleads guilty”:

unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated.


The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler.

As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin,

or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important Jews which are much

above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim.


Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:


“The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind”.

And George Steiner:“For 5000 years we have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others”.


We know that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed during the last war, with women

and children: silence about this real holocaust. If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to

do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion

of which will be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour: all the rest is suicide.


Neither “mondialism” nor Orwellian laws for “crime of thought” can prevent antisemitism to explode: only OUR

behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on. It will increase out of reasonable

proportions, if there can be a reasonable proportion to antisemitism. I know that it is practically impossible to check our

propensity to speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism derives from

the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the 8th day) but we must, at least, try to avoid

such blunders as the one you intend to perform in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your

films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder). I hope you will

scrutinize what I send you and escape the folly of the majority of our congeners. I will always answer you if you

have the integrity to write to me.


Cordialement à vous.

Signed by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .


The «Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.


1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war

ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good piece

of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder,

as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?


2. Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything to

do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German

towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and children who

are never mentioned?


3. Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is

well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz,

there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).


4. Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was

the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend . What about

the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?


5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that the Germans cremated

1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the

holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke?


6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never

ending whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians

who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic,

from the collapse of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who,

back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?


7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666,

inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?


8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the

crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable?


9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue,

a court ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical.

It would seal truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to

the revisionist Gorbatchev.


10. How could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one

( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the

Degesh, which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable?


11. Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that

there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is

the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report,

heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken.


12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr Roques, on the “Gerstein report” cancelled?

And still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister,

Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that ” nobody could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing

first through the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux said: “I admired the skill and perfection of a

“chartist” performed by M.Roques in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report” (in his book: “la guerre absolue” 1998).


13. Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, (to which no revisionist was invited),

(state) that there was not the slightest trace of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?


14. Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as expressed in a book written

by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”), by sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small detail?


15. Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could be used in the concentration camps for

other purposes than delousing and protection against typhus? Why large quantities

of Zyclon-B could be found in camps where it is official that there never was any gasings???


16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber” and never on the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR,

by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of

Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews?


17. Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves by

talking of “poetic licence” in their holocaust assertions, and never came back when summoned by the judges?

18. Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood

and another man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses).


19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out nines? There is no need of Stalino-Orwellian law

“to be put in prison because of ones beliefs” (thought crime of ” 1984 “) as stated M. Toubon, before he became a

minister of Justice in France, to set up truth. This law is anti constitutional, anti democratic, against the rights of men.

Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with

an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to grant it but

refused it almost immediately. The forum did take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the

Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby,

move their little finger only when authorized.


20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude, he is

forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma,

which in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a secular state.


21. Why did the EXPRESS, a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber

shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all that concerns it, is false?


22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler

had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism

which pollute man and the planet and which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification. Only two parties are left:

the totalitarian Judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for the Goyim not yet cankered by

Capitalisto-Marxist Jewish influence.


In “Marianne” Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress about the

despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington. He writes: “They have reduced

the Shoah to a financial market. So the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of

this time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant of Kiev, the modest

shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected

Rembrandt and Rubens, slept on a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children

to the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing

the holocaust to a Shoa-business.” If Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more trial

on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt!


By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.

(A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy)







Click on this text to watch a Holocaust Quiz


The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war

effort, to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors,

to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore

Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations

from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme

importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests

ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.


No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in

German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER

AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were

rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons

being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after

examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more

humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.  

(See World War II West Coast Camps for Japanese-Americans 

here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p-45_Weber.html )

What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the use, of homicidal

gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of

human derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories"

where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other

outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.


In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews.

After World War II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations.


Indeed tens of thousands of imprisoned Jews died during the last months of WWII

due to disease, especially typhus, and starvation (The International Committee

of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German

custody, about half of them Jews). After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the

losing side, food and medicine become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for

those imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine

manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and

firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless

war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).

Indeed there were crematoriums
working overtime as a means of sanitarily disposing

of disease ridden corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and

never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.

As a matter of fairness
, try to imagine what would have become of all the Japanese

incarcerated in American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of war

turned against an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they

would have been massacred by furious Americans before they had starved to death.

Once you fully realize
that there were no "gas chambers" or such things as

human skin lampshades, most of the Jewish narrative regarding the so called

"holocaust" becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated by the lowest

sort of scammers.

Only lies need laws for protection. There are many individuals who have been

imprisoned in occupied Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust

scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting hatred for the Jews" whereas it's

actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES.


Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent. By instilling

unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity via the "holocaust", humanity is

rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with,

any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The "holocaust" is also an

ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust survivors" through the collection of hundreds

of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that

continues to this day.



Jews have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense,
with fines and imprisonment, and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured
many against their official narrative.  The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only
lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever have done — and want to do in
America — is criminalize not believing their improbable narrative.  It is their
“education” that has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.



Click on this text to view hundreds of videos exposing the HOLOCAUST LIES


Well-nourished children – in a ‘death camp’?

Do these JEWS  look like they've been starved?…
That's not how they would have looked like
in a Jew-run Soviet concentration camp, apart
from having been raped and sodomized, as well.

Likewise, in the Jew-occupied Palestine, their
fellow Jews could have had them killed and
cannibalized for their marketable body parts.

Whether in their guise as Judo-communists
or in their latter-day incarnation as Zionists,
the last people on earth the Jews would want
to be imprisoned by is anyone like themselves.

Mr Hitler's 1941 anti-Bolshevik Crusade made
the internment of Jews unavoidable – clearly
necessitated by the massive recruitment of
the Jews by the NKVD (KGB).  
The American
FBI and the German Gestapo had numerous
identical examples of having arrested some
Soviet spies – only to find that they've got
Jews in custody.  
By contrast, no such hostile
recruitment was ever evidenced in regard of
the Japanese-Americans, who were interned
on purely racial grounds.  (And how many of
them would have survived in the American
‘death camps’ – had the U.S. lost the war?)

As far as the Third Reich was concerned,
from 1941 on, the Jewish problem suddenly
became a matter of security, rather than
a racial or political matter.  
For example,
despite Mr Hitler's 1941 Commissar Order
providing for summary executions of all
terrorist suspects in a war zone, no measures
of any kind were taken against the Mountain
Jews of North Caucasus, as their Muslim
neighbours vouched that they weren't 
involved with communism.
 And the Germans
appreciated the friendly disposition on the
part of the Muslims, who, of course, were
glad to see the back of the Soviets – and paid
a terrible price when the scumbags returned.

Hungarian Jewish women with their babies at Dachau, May 1945
Of course, none of those babies could have been carried to term
in a Soviet concentration camp.  All of them would have been self-
aborted by the starved and overworked (and pack-raped) mothers.


Jews partially invented the "holocaust" to distract people from what the JEWS actually

did to the Russians/Germans/Ukrainians/Poles etc.. Instead of appearing as  criminal

oppressors, the JEW planners of all wars and the real bosses controlling our countries,

are now considered "poor innocent victims" that we should never criticize.


GULAG boss Moishe Berman with his accomplices.
Semi-anonymous KGB cutthroats exterminated sixty six
million – and not one of those vile Judo-communist mass
murderers was ever prosecuted in ‘democratized’ Russia.

Yet the Jew/KGB-suborned Russian media gloated every
time some dying ex-SS-man was being dragged through
the courts by the bloodthirsty Jews in ‘democratic’ West.

Back in the Soviet times, KGB – this partly Jewish gang
of pimps, mass murderers and bumbling
poisoners – was a mere government agency.

And became the government itself.

Offer the FREE HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE to those who may need it:  http://user1252122.sites.myregisteredsite.com/id172.html





1919 CE-1921 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Americans had a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans, following
WWI the Americans set up a quarantine, disinfection and work camp at Oświęcim (Auschwitz) in 1919 CE to combat
typhus. The American Polish Typhus Relief Expedition 1919-1921 established the camp(s) because it was less than
50 miles to Krakow, Poland and had excellent railroad connections. Local gardens producing food at reasonable prices.
From there also, the peasants refugees could be spread out over the farms in western Galicia to help with the
harvest, thereby easing the burden that they were to the country.” The American-Poland Camp “housed some
700 children and about 2,500 prisoners.” A Red Cross hospital was established there for refugees, some 5,000
to 6,000 persons per day and about 75% were transient military personnel. The American army used Zyklon, once
the typhus epidemics started to arrive around 1942 CE. A 1921 CE report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant”
described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated on Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was
gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their hair cut off and were
put through showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps.




Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
During WW I the British Government had agreed with leading Rothschilds Crime Mob Ashkenazis that they
would support a Ashkenazi homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Ashkenazi lobby in America
(ROTHSCHILDS AIPAC) getting the USA into WW II. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the
British Government promising the Ashkenazis a homeland in Palestine. After WW I the British Government were
unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Ashkenazis claimed 6 million Jews
in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was
14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.
1925 CE-1941 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — HUMAN SOAP LIES & PROPAGANDA — “the classic lie of war
propaganda” Radha Binod Pal (1886 – 1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East,
the Japanese version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials. He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial
which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference to the World War I British propaganda
lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed into them making soap.
In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament, the story was untrue, in 1941 CE, “there
wasn’t a word of truth in it”, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II. Same Ashkenazi lies about lampshades.
1933 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Jewish World Almanacs on Jewish Population
show 1933 population of 15,315,000 Jews and show in 1948 15,753,000 Jews.
between HITLER and Zionists Negotiated to send Ashkenazis to Palestine.
ZIONISM & it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side.  Mildenstein, SS Office for
Jewish Affairs, travelled to Palestine for 6 months accompanied by Zionist officials & spent
1935 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germany introduced strict race separation laws and the Head of Germany’s
Zionist Movement Mr Georg Kareski gave an interview said he had been trying for years to find a method to
keep the two races (Germans & Jews) separate, and he said the race laws supported the
Jewish desires as the Jews had been struggling against assimilation for nearly 2000 years.
1936 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — A growing enormous opposition to the Haavara Transfer Agreement came from
powerful Jewish circles in the USA. Many of European Jews were extremely rich and powerful and they had
started to use their influence to sabotage the Haavara Agreement. They set up armed resistance and agitator
groups to fight against Hitlers idea. They also spread fabricated ‘atrocity’ propaganda about how badly Jews
were being treated in Germany. This propaganda was designed to swing world opinion against Hitlers Haavara Pact.
1938 CE-1949 CE: Mengele (1911 CE-1979 CE) spent three years with a Waffen SS unit, mostly in the East and
in Russia, where, according to SS records, he was wounded and declared medically unfit for combat. 
 He was a German officer and physician in Auschwitz camp supposedly to perform human experiments
on prisoners.  Mengele had doctorates in anthropology and medicine and was a researcher interested in genetics.
  After the war Mengele sailed to Argentina in 1949 and ended up in Brazil in 1960. The Ashkenazis were after
him all that time, and supposedly he drowned after suffering a stroke while swimming off the Brazilian
coast in 1979 CE. After the war he was intercepted in his travel by British Intelligence who were interested
in Mengele’s supposed work on creating bizarre trauma for breaking young people and creating a blank slate
brain-wiped individual who could be “layered” with “alters” (Programmed) that would robotically carry out
spying or dangerous criminal activities.  British thought they most needed the perfect trauma for programming
transnational robotic tools of war. But Mengele may have been a front or victim of his own work and became
a brainwashed and did as he was told – whatever he was told like smile, chuckle, and he might have become
a display or front for the British.  The British Ashkenazis were so paranoid that in 1985, amidst much hoopla,
they put on a HOLY-HOAX show trial conducted to quell the MEDIA DEVELOPED uprisings of hate against
Mengele and his fellow escapes.  Of course, with NO DEFENSE, he was found “guilty” in his absence, but it
was just for the cameras. The Ashkenazi Brits and Yanks didn’t want any discussion of brainwashing, and nobody
was thought able to believe it was considered so bizarre. Mengele’s research ideas and efforts likely led to
the CIA-Monarch programming program which was designed for brainwashing to program our children’s
futures.  Mengele is now fully linked to “Monarch Programming” on the internet thanks to MEDIA HYPE.
1939 CE-1944 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — British government decided in 1941 CE that there were not enough
dramatic photographs of Nazi atrocities and the BRITISH COVERT OPERATIONS (BSC) arranged for a studio
in CANADA to create such photographs using actors, stage-sets, costumes, and dummies for the manufacture
of war scenes in which actors dressed up as Nazi soldiers were shown mass-murdering innocent people. These
photos were widely circulated in the United States. – Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the
United States, 1939 CE-1944 CE. WWII UK and US PSYOPS Exposed the details of how British and Americans
set up a fake German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities”
with which to get the American public to support the war against Germany. PURE FAKERY IN ENGLAND +
CANADA + AMERICA too fake photos to demonize the Germans! And they still teach it in High School & College
history classes. The American army used Zyklon for a typhus epidemic in 1942 CE. A 1921 report in the
New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant” described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated on
Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while
the immigrants had their hair cut off and were put through showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the
— Russian forgery experts spent most of their time in producing material designed to delude, confound and
mislead their perceived enemies, both domestic and foreign. Much of this began after the Second World War with
extensive rewriting, editing and deliberate forgeries of German military and political documents designed to
embarrass the United States and its client, as well as to elevate the image of their own regime. One of the most
ambitious Soviet productions concerned the writings of Dr. Josef Goebbels. Because handwritten documents on
the original, special paper Goebbels used would have been nearly impossible to successfully fake, the new
Soviet line was that the documents had actually been typed and then put onto glass negatives. These were hidden
by the Germans in cases where the Soviets were able to “discover” them after the war. Having altered the
Goebbels’ diaries from “several stacked folders” of handwritten material to a box of more easily forged photographs
of typed manuscript, the Russians began to offer their rare, politically incorrect material to sources in Germany
for sale and publication. German experts universally rejected these productions as completely fake.
Second WW II propaganda never mentions Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish
victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second
World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Memoirs is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which
altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of
‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”1941 CE: Stalin’s “Torch-men-Order” #0428 confirmed by Russia – Declares
that Russian partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements
within a swathe of about 40 – 60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population.
With these tactics it was important to leave a few survivors, which would report the supposed German terror attacks.
This method of warfare was also confirmed by German soldiers
who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms.



Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
1941 CE-1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Hitler had second thoughts about setting up a Jewish Nation State
and sending thousands of Jews to that State to create Jewish forces & money to use against Germany, but the
Haavara Agreement continued right on into WW  II to at least 1942 CE. Hitler wanted young and healthy Jews
to work for their food and lodgings in factories and eventually resettle in Western Russia south of Minsk until
after the war finished. Arabs were so concerned by the close co-operation between the Nazis & Zionists that
they became convinced that Hitler must be a Jew who was just trying to establish a Jewish State throughout
the Middle East. “Between January 1 1943 and March 3 1943 CE 113,015 Jews were evacuated from the Reich
including Bohemia and Moravia, the new Eastern Territories and the district of Bialystok to the East
and 8,025 Jews were moved to the Ghetto for the Aged in Theresienstadt.” – The Korherr Report.
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty different industries.
The true reason for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is as an industrial complex which surrounded the
camp – most of it within full view of the interior of the camp itself. German industry included arms factories,
foundries and mines. They used the prisoners for most of the labour. The largest work camp was Auschwitz III
(Monowitz). It started operations in May 1942 CE and was associated with the synthetic rubber and liquid fuel
plant Buna-Werke owned by IG Farben. Eleven thousand laborers worked at Monowitz. Seven thousand inmates
worked at various chemical plants. Eight thousand worked in mines. Approximately 40,000 prisoners worked in
labor camps at Auschwitz. Some put the number of prisoners who worked at Auschwitz at 83,000. It is clear
these prisoners worked for the German war effort in the Auschwitz prison complex. The Monowitz industrial
complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging
from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing. Auschwitz was the site of Germany’s
newest and most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this
particular field of technology. Shortly after the First World War the Germans were cut off from their supply of
natural rubber. Auschwitz was picked because it was a railway centre. Auschwitz had a hospital
next door to treat prisoners.
1942 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Far from being the “death camps” as you have heard so often, places
like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were work camps,
critical to the German war effort. The Jewish workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed
specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived
in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons
camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Many thousands of secret German wartime
documents dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated after the war by the Allies. But not a single one refers to
a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the familiar Auschwitz extermination story cannot be reconciled
with the documentary evidence. Evidence shows those unable to work were, a very high percentage of the Jewish
inmates, and were treated in the hospital or clinic. German telex message dated 1943 CE from the chief of the
Labor Allocation department, reported that of 25,000 Jews held in Auschwitz, only 3,581 or 14% were able to work,
and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates — some 21,500, or about 86% were unable to work. 1944 CE
report on “security measures in Auschwitz” by Oswald Pohl, head of the camp system, to Heinrich Himmler
reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were
hospitalized or disabled and in Auschwitz II camp there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom “approximately
15,000 are unable to work.” This camp II was established primarily as a camp for Jews who were not able to work,
including the sick and elderly. A Jewish scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University,
acknowledges in his 1988 CE book about the “final solution” that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result
of typhus and other “natural” causes than were executed. Auschwitz had a Swimming Pool, Soccer Field, Post Office,
Cinema, Hospital, Art Studio & Classes, Dental Office, Six Camp Orchestras, and a Library with 45,000 books.
The elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz was built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and
Sunday afternoons. 1944 CE there are photos showing a fencing tournament for prisoners at Auschwitz (note
the sign in the background). Postcards written from Auschwitz still exist and the postman would collect the mail
twice-weekly. Auschwitz was visited monthly by International Red Cross inspection teams who were allowed
to speak to prisoner representatives alone, in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery,
interruption of mail and parcel delivery, health concerns, food and ration matters etc.
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz Nurses and Doctors provided Medical Care and Special Treatment
to Inmates in sickbays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities, and the
garrison physician Dr. Wirths, tried with all conceivable means to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive and healthy.
1943 CE-1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — The Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was the CIA’s “black propaganda”
branch during WW II. At its peak in late 1944, the OSS employed almost 13,000 men and women. OSS agent and
propagandist says 6,000,000 Jews will be obliterated Wallace R. Deuel, a Chicago-born political scientist who
worked at the American University in Beirut and wrote anti-German books and advised Walt Disney on anti-German
propaganda cartoons and was OSS special assistant to OSS’s director William J. Donovan. 1954 CE-1968 CE Deuel
held numerous senior positions in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative
at the White House during the Kennedy administration (close to a future dead president). “The Nazis set out in
the beginning to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not
less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning.” Says the propagandist Wallace R. Deuel.
1943 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — David Irving said, “As late as August 1943 the head of the (British) PWE
[Psychological Warfare Executive] minuted the Cabinet secretly that despite the stories they were putting out,
there was not the slightest evidence that such contraptions (tools of genocide) existed.” This attitude changed
in 1944, when British Intelligence finally came to believe its own atrocity propaganda, as it was recycled back to them
through the chaos and fury of war.
MILLION RUSSIANS – MOSTLY CHRISTIANS – February 29, 1944 CE letter to the BBC & higher members of the
British clergy, from the British Ministry of Information ordered the propaganda buildup against the Germans.
Today, the BBC has begun to play a major role in recycling these lies and propaganda back to their point of
origin in Poland. These broadcasts in effect created a feedback loop that repeated and gave authority to Polish
rumors, which were then re-injected back into Poland. — The Gas Chambers of Sherlock Holmes by Samuel Crowell
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — British Intelligence decrypted German reports show
that 39% of German prisoners were Jews, 65% Poles and only 3% Russians.
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Picture of the detainees who were left to be freed by the Soviet Army
in January 1945. Again, see for yourself how healthy even the sick looks. Many children are among
them too.


Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACT WITH HOAX — Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was
allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: “The whole propaganda which started about
Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us [communist inmates] with the help of our Polish comrades.” (Deutsche
Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July 1945). Thus, it is not surprising to learn that
during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been
orchestrated by communist authorities. — THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY
The Case For Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf in 1991 CE.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “Of course, no physical evidence whatsoever was shown to verify the
alleged homicidal gas chambers, despite knowledge of their existence being denied
by every single defendant.” —Jason Myers, on the Nuremberg trials of 1946 CE.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human gas chamber was constructed
in 1946 by Stalin of the Ashkenazi USSR that mass murdered 66+ million Russians, mostly Christians.
1946 CE-Today: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide poisoning is on record for
any German labor camp. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in the German
labor camps. None of the war generals after the war who wrote their memoirs made any allusion to human gas
chambers or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group. The Red Cross made normal, routine
visits to Auschwitz during the war, and its published reports made no allusion to any ongoing
human gassing there. No authentic documents attesting to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — Report of Council on Foreign Relations – Funded by Rockefeller-Rothschilds
Crime Syndicate — Made up their mind that no “revisionism” was to be encouraged after World War II:
“The Committee on Studies of the Council on Foreign Relations is concerned that the debunking journalistic
campaign following World War I should not be repeated and believes that the American public deserves
a clear and competent statement of our basic aims and activities during the second World War.”
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Illegal Jewish immigrants were sprayed by British as a precaution
against typhus carrying lice with large AMOUNTS OF ZYKLON-B USED ALSO AT THE CAMPS.
1948 CE-1949 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume
 “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War”.
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to
interview prisoners in the Ashkenazi run USSR (Russian) camps. The Official International Red Cross Records
of WWII at Arolsen, Germany show Actual prison camp Total Deaths at 271,301 people. The Bad Arolsen archives
list everyone who lived and died in all the German labor camps. The question naturally arises as to what is the total
number recorded in this tremendous archive. Clearly, the managers of this archive are not at liberty to tell of this
or they would be jailed for so awful a crime, but we know the FACTS! But fortunately, the Red Cross Report was
a 1650 page detailed report that never mentioned a gas chamber and showed approximately 271,300 total
dead for all the camps.
1950 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “…most of the memoirs and reports [of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are full of
preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante
philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
— Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65.
HATE PROPAGANDA are focused — “Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate —
healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German.
To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.” — Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time
1979 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was
technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research
regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas
chambers, and there can never be one.” — Published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979 CE.
1980 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — Diary of Anne Frank was totally debunked by a lawsuit in a German court.
German state forensic bureau examined the original “diary” manuscript found “significant” portions of the
work were written with a ballpoint pen, but ballpoint pens were not available before 1951. They also found
that none of the “diary” handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting, but all of the writing in
the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire “diary” was a postwar fake. The true author of the
diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in
a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank. But even more weird is the Diary was Co-Authored by Anne
Franks Father and controlled by SWISS in Basel, Switzerland. All done years after the war.
1982 CE-2001 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “Holocaust denial” laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term
Jewish campaign. In 1982 CE, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a London-based agency of the
World Jewish Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure
governments to outlaw “Holocaust denial.” The anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several
European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted its “Holocaust denial” statute in
1985 CE (amended in 1994 CE), France in 1990 CE, Austria in 1992 CE, Belgium in 1995 CE, and Slovakia in
2001 CE. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign, the International Association of Jewish
Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 CE called for new and more severe laws against “Holocaust denial.”
1991 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf (1964 CE-Today) is an author and chemist who was amazingly
convicted of the SILLY CHARGE of Holocaust denier. After his military service with the German Air Force, in 1990
CE he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research at Stuttgart, where he prepared a PhD thesis.
In 1991 CE, Rudolf began work on a paper entitled Report on the formation and verifiability of cyanide
compounds in the Auschwitz “gas chambers” and in 1993 CE, this work was reported in the media, and Rudolf
was told not to enter the Max Planck Institute again without permission. When he did so, his employment was
terminated without notice. OTHER VICTIMS OF HOLY-COST INSANITY include Ernst Zundel, Sylvia Stolz
and Vincent Reynouard.
1985 CE and 1988 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Zundel Trials, a famous court trial with expert witness
Raul Hilberg was at a loss when asked: “Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of
gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” — Zundel’s Defense counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg
in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination. “I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied. “You are (at a loss) because
you can’t,” Christie said. “The witness countered that there are aerial photographs of concentration camps,
examples of ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal nature
of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the camps.” During this trial, not a single
eyewitness for the plaintiff could be found. Zundel won and they finally stopped harassing him.

Ernst Zundel, a Canadian, was denied entry into the United States

and his story is an example of the HOAX EXPOSED COMPLETELY.

Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
1995 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison for “inciting racial hatred”
(TELLING THE TRUTH) by the district court of Stuttgart because of his dissertation research now known as the
“Rudolf Report”. Rudolf avoided prison by fleeing to Spain, England, and finally
to the United States. All the while, criminal investigations continued in Germany.
1995 CE: KABALISTIC ORIGINS OF THE SIX MILLION FIGURE — Ben Weintraub’s book, Holocaust Dogma Of
Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic occultism involved in the number. 6,000,000 as the number
of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the Kabala.
The 6 million number was published over and over in newspaper as revealed by Ashkenazi Friedman from 1916 CE-Today!
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw his application for a final PhD
examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. The university said Rudolf used his
academic credentials or knowledge to commit a crime – Meaning facts about “HOLY-COST!” Rudolf knew
his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but stated that his findings at Auschwitz and Birkenau
“completely shattered his world view” when he found only insignificant traces of cyanide compounds can be found
in the samples taken from Auschwitz.
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “It is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability
to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.” — French
‘historian’ Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien (Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996 CE, p. 14.
1997 CE-2013 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf began to publish books on Holocaust CHEMICAL FACTS
and founded Castle Hill Publishers in 1997 based in Hastings, England and was linked to Theses & Dissertations Press
as its American outlet. In 2000, Rudolf initiated an English language Holocaust Handbooks Series which, as of 2013,
encompassed 25 titles. Until his arrest in late 2005, he published the now defunct “Quarterly journal for free historical research.”
2000 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers… or seek to disprove
the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.” —
‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’ at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000 CE.
2003 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Holocaust story has served to create a highly profitable business for
large numbers of Jews, something which the honest Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein described as the
“Holocaust Industry” in his book of the same name (The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation
of Jewish Suffering, Verso Books, 2003). The “Holocaust” served (and still serves) well in justifying the Zionist
seizure of Palestine. Any criticism of the overt human rights violations and atrocities
committed by the state of Israel against the Palestinians is dismissed as “anti- Semitism.”



Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
2004 CE-2010 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf, THE TRUTH TELLER, in district court of Mannheim
grabbed Rudolf’s bank account to rob 55% of Rudolf’s business turnover from the years 2001-2004, but at
that time the account contained only some €5,000. Rudolf and his associates had earned this money by
selling TRUTH TELLING publications banned in Germany, but Rudolf’s business was in the UK and the US.
In 2004, Rudolf married a US citizen and settled in Chicago, and they later had a child. For some reason he
had to apply for political asylum, or at least for the right not to be expelled, but this was turned down.
In 2005 Immigration Services said that Rudolf did not have a right to stay with his family and was extradited to
Germany and on arrival was arrested by the police and transferred to a prison in Rottenburg, then to another in
Stuttgart in Baden-Württemberg. In 2007, the German Court sentenced him to two years and six months in
prison for TELLING THE TRUTH or as the court put it “inciting hatred, disparaging the dead, and libel.” The German
police confiscated copies of his “Lectures on the Holocaust” and destroyed. In 2009 the TRUTH
TELLER Rudolf was released from prison and now lives in the US with his wife and daughter.
2007 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very
little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as
shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who
told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the
same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about
the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”
– John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust. https://codoh.com/library/document/680/
2015 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s
knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or
return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical and scientific level – click link:
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “If the Holocaust were unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on
this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this is the only historical topic that is regulated by penal
law. This is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider this topic to be the most important issue to keep
under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing powers are the real criminals—not the historical
dissidents they send to prison.” – Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can and Will Destroy the Holocaust Establishment,
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s
knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance
or return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson. When we ask detailed and pointed questions, our historians
fall short. They don’t really know when, where, or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how
it was possible. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly held thousands of bodies. And they refuse to
even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. The ‘Holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives
ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted and even put in prison. Truth needs no
protection from scrutiny, but lies do.
2017 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The three victor nations, Russia, America and Britain, collaborated together
at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high
ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two million tons of bombs. People were loath to
believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American
intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience.
Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was
the original WMD hoax.” – Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality.
Today CE: ASHKEANAZI FACTS — We know Ashkenazis are the Masters of Make-Believe to make the world
believe in Death Camps. They now infest Hollywood with the fakery and lies continually spewing out falsehoods
to gain sympathy for a group of ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE CRIMINALS attacking Americans and
Europeans with their propaganda and outright lies. Today’s Hollywood Ashkenazis are the heirs of the
original crop of wartime Hollywood producers and directors who were called into service by the U.S. Army to “document”
(PROPAGANDIZE) the concentration camps.

For the past 20 years or so, it has been fun to watch how the ever-evolving field of "Holocaust Studies"
adjusts to new discoveries which contradict the original narrative. For example, when it became
apparent that there wasn't actually any documentation to support the Holohoax, the Holohoaxers
abandoned their 50 year old mantra of "It's well documented!", and seamlessly transitioned to:
"The Germans destroyed the documents" mode.
Another addition to Holocaustianity is the distinction that is now made between "work camps"
and "extermination camps." You see, as pathetic and self-abasing as modern day German guilt-trippers
are, they still aren't going to say that a certain German-based camp, Dachau for example, had
homicidal gas chambers when it didn't; or that "millions" died there when they didn't. The fact
that the West, in spite of its intellectual tyranny, was still much more open and free that the old
Soviet bloc, began to complicate things for the Holohoaxers. For that reason, all of internment
camps which were located in the West are now described as "work camps" whereas seven
of those located in Poland and Ukraine have been classified as "extermination camps." 
The chart below was copied from 'The Jewish Virtual Library " -- which pulled the information
from the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps"
(in red) are said to have been located:

Forced Labor
Holding Center
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Holding Center
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Forced Labor
Czech Republic
Holding Center/Transit
You see that? Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one in Ukraine; but zero
in either of the western states Germany, France or the Netherlands. That's a very
weird "anomaly." Why the east-west divide between "work" and "extermination"?
It's elementary dear reader, elementary. If you know anything at all about World War II and the
subsequent birth of "The Iron Curtain", you know that no western researchers, no aid workers,
no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human rights activists, no investigative
researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to poke around in Joe Stalin's
Communist post-war front yard of Poland or Ukraine. Therein lies the rub! Hence, the
Holohoaxers, both then and now, can make any claim they want to in regard to what took place in
the air-tight closed east. 
In 1945, it was essential for the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation camps" mainly in Stalin's
Poland & Ukraine. Seventy years later, it is essential the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation
camps" completely in Poland & Ukraine.  By now, the Stalinist tales of "gas chambers" and
"millions dead" have become ossified. The modern-day Poles and Russians have no interest in rocking
this leaky boat because theyweren't the ones falsely accused.
The Bottom Line:
Belief in the purely eastern-front "extermination" Holohoax necessarily
requires blind faith in the press releases of Joe Stalin and his propaganda
henchmen, as well as claims about the eastern camps which could never be verified!
 https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/591580/joseph-stalin.jpg Image result for happy jew
"We would never lie to you. Trust us."

Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1, Jews for Hitler...



View the REAL PLAN for a massive HOLOCAUST perpetrated by JEWS titled EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (Part 5)...



Concentration Camp Money

'Lagergeld' used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work

Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 7-9.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA.
By Jennifer White, administrative director of TBR;


Far from being the "death camps" as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz,
Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were
work camps, critical to the German war effort. But did you know that the Jewish
workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their
use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was
conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau
and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies
after World War II. Here is the story of the money the court historians do not want
you to even suspect existed.

Piles of incinerated corpses were indicting images at Nuremberg, used to prove that

the German-run concentration camps during World War II were intended for purposes of

exterminating the Jews of Europe. However, a plethora of documentary evidence, long

suppressed, shows that prisoners were relatively well-treated, compensated for their

hard work and allowed to purchase luxuries to which even the German public did not have

ready access. This is not the image of abject deprivation that the Holocaust lobby

would like you to entertain.


The irrefutable proof is the existence of a means of exchange for goods and services:
Money. There were at least 134 separate issues, in different denominations and styles,
for such notorious places as Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Oranienburg, Ravensbrück,
Westerbork and at least 15 other camps. (See Paper Money of the World Part I:
Modern Issues of Europe by Arnold Keller, Ph.D., 1956, pp. 23-25 for a complete listing.)

A monetary system was also in existence in the ghettos, most notably Theresienstadt and Lodz,

which produced beautiful notes (veritable works of art) that make U.S. currency look dull.


There are numerous dealers in rare currency and numismatics who specialize in selling

"concentration camp money" or "Holocaust money" as it has been sometimes called.

But the very fact of its existence does not seem to have raised questions - as it should have

- about what really did (and did not) happen inside the so-called

"death camps" where the Holocaust scrip was circulating in the first place.


This scrip was not negotiable outside of the camp for which it was issued. This decreased

the chance of a successful escape and made it impossible for the general public to purchase

some of the rare luxuries available in the camps. According to Albert Pick in

Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945:



    Inmates were not paid for the work but were given "coupons" now and then to
     buy things in the "Kantine".... As the war progressed badly and the number
     of workers declined, the KZ worker potential became important. Offers of "premiums"
     and other advantages were made to the inmates, tobacco was offered and even
     visits to bordellos.... In order that these scrips could not
     be used outside the camps, special money was printed.

Letter from Prisoner No. 11647 Block 28/3 Dachau KIII on

September 8, 1940 to his relative in Litzmannstadt (Lodz):



    I must write you something about myself. I am very well. In the canteen I buy

     honey, marmalade, cookies, fruit and other food. If you worry about me, you'll
    indeed be committing a sin. I have more reason to worry about you....
     from the Doomed: Concentration Camp Correspondence 1940-1945
    , Richard S. Geehr.)

There was a payment schedule at Theresienstadt utilizing Th. kr. (Theresienstadt kroner)

as the unit of exchange. (The Shekel Vol. XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983 p. 29). The breakdown looked like this:



    Working men, according to their jobs: 105-205 Th. kr.
    Working women, according to their jobs: 95-205 Th. kr.
    Part-time workers: 80 Th. kr.
    Caretakers: 70 Th. kr.
    War-wounded and holders of the Iron Cross,
     First Class degree or higher: 195 Th. kr.
    Prominente (doctors, professors, scientists, well-known
    cultural artists and politicians): 145 Th. kr.

To put this in perspective, a cup of coffee cost 2 Th. kr. The circulation in Theresienstadt

was such that it was necessary to print over 5 million notes. See Papirove Penize Na Uzemi

Ceskoslovenska 1762-1975, Second Edition, 1975, Hradek Kralove, trans. by Julius Sem, pp. 134-135.


The first worker's camp to have its own scrip was Oranienburg. Before using the camp scrip

they used German currency in nearby towns, but the authorities decided to centralize.

Currency was exchanged for camp money, less 30%. (The Shekel, Vol XVI, No. 2, March-April

1983, p. 40: "Concentration Camp Money of the Nazi Holocaust" by Steven Feller.)


Similarly at Buchenwald:




    Each prisoner was allowed up to 10 marks per week to be used for the purchase
     of cigarettes at the camp canteen, other canteen purchases, brothel visits, or
     credit to a savings account. The regulations went on to specify that a visit to a
    brothel would cost 2 marks for which 1.5 marks would be kept by
    the SS and 0.5 marks would be used for "expenses."
    (Ibid., p. 41.)

Was there a similar situation at all of the other camps - at least those that issued currency?

As this includes Auschwitz, it would be shocking indeed to even consider marmalade and

cigarettes being purchased in this "death camp." Even the existence of money in camps gives

us a look at what life was really like there, yet this information has yet to make it

to the History Channel.



American Israel Numismatic Association (Temarac, Florida).

Pick, Albert. Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945, Munich, Battenberg Publishers, 1976.

Schöne, Michael H., Das Papiergeld im besetzten Deutschland 1945-1949, Regenstauf: Gietl, 1994.

Stahl, Zvi, Jewish Ghettos and Concentration Camps' Money, 1933-1945, London: D. Richman Books, 1990.

See also:

Campbell, Lance K., Dachau concentration camp scrip, Margate, Florida: American Israel Numismatic Association, 1992.

The Numismatist, April 1981, by Steven Feller.

Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine, 1965, 1996, "POW Money and Medals" by Slabaugh, R. Arlie.

Schultze, Manfred, Unsere Arbeit - unsere Hoffnung: Das Ghetto in Lodz 1940-1945, Schwalmtal: Phil-Creativ, 1995.

Sem, Julius, Standard Catalog of World Paper Money, 1977 (Theresienstadt notes).

Shtarot, Vol. I, No. 2, Oct. 1976. Yasha L. Beresiner.





Click on this text to watch a six minute video titled: Hard Facts Of The Holocaust Lies...



Click on this text to examine the enhanced HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE...




“New Pages” of Anne Frank Diary Prove

that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book


Two “newly discovered” pages from the “Diary of Anne Frank” — which supposedly

contain risqué jokes — are in fact further proof that the book attributed to the Jewish

teenager was in fact written by her father — because the “hidden” writing is,

like most of the rest of the “diary,” in her father Otto Frank’s handwriting.


(The New Observer)


The “newly-discovered” pages were announced at a press conference at the “Anne Frank House”

museum in Amsterdam, where researchers apparently were able to remove two brown

paper pasted pages and “read” the obscured writing underneath using lamps and optical

character recognition technology.


The compliant Jewish lobby controlled media focused all its attention on the contents of

the “new pages,” but ignored the obvious fact of the difference in handwriting styles on

the new pages, with the “new material” all in her father’s handwriting,

which contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself.


In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war,

and who then passed it off as “real” in order to sell it as a “holocaust memoir.”


The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times that year, when the copyright

holders to the diary admitted Otto Frank’s involvement in an attempt to extend their

control of the manuscript.



As the New York Times pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s

red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly

contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.”


Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank

died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public

domain in February 2015.

But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to

try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period—by

admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.


The implications of this admission are obvious. As the New York Times put it:


While the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled its intentions a year ago,

warnings about the change have provoked a furor as the deadline approaches. Some

people opposed to the move have declared that they would defy the foundation

and publish portions of her text.


Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès Tricoire,

a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics

have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. “If you follow their

arguments, it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.”


The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed to be “Anne Frank’s diary”

was in fact written by her father after the war—a fact which also explains the use of ball

point pen in the “diary,” a writing device which only became available after 1945.





Click on this text to examine the Anne Frank Fraud.







The Secular Religion of the 'HOLOCAUST'

The religion of "the Holocaust" is a secular one: it belongs to the lay world; it is profane;
in actuality, it has at its disposal the secular arm, that is a temporal authority with dreaded power.
It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets and its high priests. As one
revisionist has observed, it has its circle of saints, male and female, amongst whom, for
example, Saint Anne (Frank), Saint Simon (Wiesenthal) and Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy
places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (and macabre) buildings and its relics ...

Click on this text to meet URSULA HAVERBECK who will spend her 91st Birthday in a German prison for questioning the holocaust fraud.

Click on this text to examine PEOPLE EXPOSING THE HOLOCAUST LIES...



Click on this text to watch JIM RIZOLI - HOLO-FACTS





Click on this text to examine an actual holocaust perpetrated by JEWS upon the Ukrainians.

Allied Attacks Killed Thousands of Camp Inmates: The 1945 'Cap Arcona' and 'Thielbek' Sinkings
Mark Weber -- Institute for Historical Review

All prisoners of German wartime concentration camps who perished while in German custody
are routinely regarded as "victims of Nazism" -- even if they lost their lives as direct or
indirect result of Allied policy ... Among the German concentration camp prisoners who perished
at Allied hands were some 7,000 inmates who were killed during the war's final week as they
were being evacuated in three large German ships that were attacked by British war
planes. This little-known tragedy is one of history's greatest maritime disasters.

Auschwitz Chemistry: How Science Proves The ‘Final Solution’

Was Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives

By John Wear







Above: “Gassing Clothing”. Left: Healthy inmates at work sterilizing clothing. 


Right: Healthy prisoners at Auschwitz working in oneof the larger clothing disinfestation chambers in the camp.

Above: The Auschwitz camp employed a number of delousing stations, which used steam and Zyklon-B to kill lice in

prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave number 2, seen from the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing was put

on hangers attached to a trolley and pushed inside the chamber. Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was

pushed into the chamber on two short rails. The disinfection stations were constructed with double doors so that the

infected and cleaned clothes would not be mixed together. This picture was taken while the camp was operational.


Source: Peter Winter, Chapter 10- Auschwitz

Source: https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau

Defenders of the Holocaust story have attempted to discredit scientific reports which disprove the existence of homicidal

gas chambers at German camps during World War II. For example, Deborah Lipstadt’s defense attorney, Richard Rampton,

referred in court to The Leuchter Report as “…a piece of so-called research which is not worth the paper it is written on…”[1]


Dr. Richard Green states about Germar Rudolf:


Owing to the fact that he actually has some understanding of chemistry, many of his deceptions are more sophisticated

than other Holocaust deniers…Ultimately, he engages in the same deceptions and specious arguments as [Fred] Leuchter

and [Walter] Lüftl , but the case he makes for those deceptions and arguments involves more difficult chemistry.”[2]


This article will discuss attempts by chemists to discredit scientific reports which disprove

the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau during World War II.


Historical Background


In 1988, the Canadian government put Ernst Zündel on trial a second time for the criminal offense of knowingly disseminating

false news about “the Holocaust.” As part of his defense in this trial, Zündel commissioned the American gas-chamber

expert Fred Leuchter to make a scientific examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau

and Majdanek. The resulting Leuchter Report is the first scientific study of the alleged German homicidal gas chambers.[3]


In addition to reporting that the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were structurally

unsuitable for gassing, Leuchter researched the chemical properties of the Zyklon B fumigant. Leuchter found that Zyklon B

is a highly toxic compound that releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas. The released hydrogen cyanide gas clings to

surfaces and  reacts chemically with materials containing iron, forming ferrocyanide compounds that have a distinctive blue

color called Prussian Blue. Since building materials normally contain a certain amount of rust (iron oxide, usually between

one and four percent), repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas would result in Prussian Blue staining on the walls

of the alleged gas chambers.[4]


Leuchter took forensic samples from the alleged gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing

facility at Birkenau. The samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory found

no significant ferrocyanide compound traces in the samples taken from the alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the

sample from a wall of the Birkenau delousing facility had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter

concluded that this result would be impossible if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to

hydrogen cyanide gas.[5]


Germar Rudolf, a certified chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by writing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992.

The Rudolf Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused on engineering and chemical aspects

of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all

of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated

with Prussian Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing

facilities have Prussian Blue staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas

chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.


Rudolf also took samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau.

Similar to Leuchter’s samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant traces of ferrocyanide residue

on the same order of magnitude found in any other building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all

showed very high ferrocyanide residues. Rudolf determined that, if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had

taken place in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit similar

ferrocyanide residue as the delousing chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded that mass gassings

with Zyklon B did not occur in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.[6]


Kraków Institute of Forensic Research


The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that attempted to refute the Leuchter Report.

The team from this forensic institute led by Dr. Jan Markiewicz claims not to have understood how it was possible for

Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas. The researchers therefore

excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron cyanide compounds from their analyses, resulting in much lower cyanide traces

for the delousing chambers. Their analysis made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed

to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a cyanide residue of close to zero. The Kraków researchers

concluded from their analysis that since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all

had the same amount of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers.


Germar Rudolf gave the Kraków researchers irrefutable proof that Prussian Blue can be formed in walls exposed to

hydrogen cyanide gas, citing a case document in expert literature.[7] The authors of the Kraków

report refused to change their report and admit they made a mistake. Rudolf writes:


The only ‘scientific’ attempt to refute Frederick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis turns out to be one of the

biggest scientific frauds of the 20th century. How desperate must they be—those who try to defend the established

version of the Holocaust, i.e., the alleged systematic extermination of Jews in

homicidal ‘gas chambers’, that they resort to such obviously fraudulent methods?”[8]


British science historian Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom also refuted the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research

report, as succinctly summarized by the retired professor of the philosophy of science Dr. James H. Fetzer:


When the Auschwitz museum was confronted with the fact that the innocuous delousing chambers at Auschwitz

have blue walls–due to being saturated with blue iron cyanide compounds–but the alleged homicidal gas chambers

have not, they commissioned their own chemical research. Instead of testing wall samples for the chemicals

that had caused the blue stains, the researchers they commissioned simply excluded those chemicals from their

analysis by employing a procedure that could not detect them. They justified this measure with the claim that

they did not understand exactly how these compounds could form and that they might therefore be mere artifacts.

Researchers who don’t understand what they are investigating have no business becoming involved. In this case,

however, it appears to be deliberate. They have deliberately ignored an obvious explanation–that Zyklon B was only

used for delousing–which would have remedied their lack of comprehension. As a result of this failure to

adhere to the principles of science, they produced a report of no scientific value, which they used to arrive at a

predetermined conclusion.[9]


Dr. Arthur Robert Butz writes in regard to the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:


The argument, to the extent that it was intelligible enough to be summarized at all, was that they did not understand

how the iron-cyanide compounds got to be there, so they decided to ignore them in reaching their conclusions.

I don’t understand how the moon got there, so I will ignore all effects associated with it, such as tides. I hope I don’t drown.”[10]


Read Previous Article: 

Wear’s War Movie Review: “Mr Death” An Epic Propaganda Stuff Up & The Jewish Panic To Remedy It


Dr. James Roth


Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as

an Analytical Chemist at Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide

content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron

and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply in porous materials such as brick and iron.[11]


Dr. Roth later changed his testimony in a documentary movie titled

 Mr. Deathproduced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:


Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns

in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go

looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[12]


Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes that Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death are wrong:


The 1999 film about Leuchter features an interview with the chemist [Dr. James Roth] who had done the analysis

of his wall-samples back in 1988. He had done this “blind,” i.e. with no knowledge of where they had come from,

which was correct scientific procedure. During the second Zündel trial in Toronto in 1988 he testified under oath

concerning the method used and what Leuchter had sent him. He said back then that hydrogen cyanide can easily

penetrate into brick and mortar. But then, when he was interviewed again by Morris for his documentary, he

suddenly stated that the results were quite meaningless, because the cyanide could only have soaked a few microns

 into the brickwork. Wow, that was quite a whopper. Mortar and brickwork are highly porous to hydrogen cyanide,

obviously so because the delousing chambers were more or less equally blue inside and out, it had soaked right through.

But you can watch him on video explaining this, as if he were confusing brick and mortar with rock. The latter will only

absorb cyanide to a few microns of its surface.[13]


Germar Rudolf writes in regard to Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death:

“It can be shown that Prof. Dr. James Roth is wrong for the following reasons:


  1. It is a fact that the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof, and Majdanek are saturated
  2.  with cyanide compounds, and this not only superficially, but into the depth of the masonry, as I have demonstrated
  3. by taking samples from different depths of the wall. Compare in this regard my mortar and plaster Sample Pairs
  4.  9 & 11, 12 & 13, 19a & b…, which were each taken at the same spot but at different depths, as well as Sample 17,
  5. taken from below the overlying lime plaster (which is thus similar to 19b). These values prove that hydrogen cyanide
  6. can rather easily reach deep layers of plaster and mortar. But even the other samples taken from the surface prove
  7. that Prof. Roth’s allegation is wrong: Provided that most of the cyanide detectable today is present in the form of
  8.  iron cyanide (Iron Blue and other cyanoferrates), as Prof. Roth assumes himself, his thesis would mean that 10% to
  9. 75% of the iron content of these samples are located in the upper 10 micrometers thin layer of the samples (0.010 mm),
  10. i.e., they are located in less than 1% of the entire sample mass. The rest of the samples, however, would have been
  11.  massively deprived of iron. How this migration of a major portion of iron to a thin surface
  12.  layer would have happened is inexplicable to me. Fact is that this simply could not happen.

  13. Furthermore, expert literature is detailed about the following:

    1. Hydrogen cyanide is an extremely mobile chemical compound with physical properties comparable to water…

    2. Water vapor can quite easily penetrate masonry material, and thus also hydrogen cyanide…

    3. Hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate thick, porous layers like walls…

  14. In addition, it is generally known that cement and lime mortar are highly porous materials, comparable for instance
  15.  to sponges. In such materials, there does not exist anything like a defined layer of 0.01 mm beyond which hydrogen
  16. cyanide could not diffuse, as there can also be no reason, why water could not penetrate a sponge deeper than a millimeter.
  17.  Steam, for example, which behaves physically comparable to hydrogen cyanide, can very easily penetrate walls.

  18. Finally, the massive discolorations of the outside of the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Birkenau and Stutthof,
  19.  as shown in this expert report, are clearly visible and conclusive evidence for the fact of
  20. how easily hydrogen cyanide and its soluble derivatives can and do penetrate such walls.

As a professor of analytical chemistry, Prof. Roth must know this, so one can only wonder why he spreads such outrageous

nonsense. That Prof. Roth is indeed a competent chemist can be seen from what he said during his testimony under oath

as an expert witness during the above mentioned Zündel trial..: ‘In porous materials such as brick or mortar, the Prussian blue

 [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open, but as the Prussian 

blue formed, it was possible that it would seal the porous material and stop the penetration.


…It is also revealing that Prof. Roth mentioned during this interview that, if he had known where Leuchter’s samples

originated from, his analytical results would have been different. Does that mean that Prof. Roth manipulates his result

according to whether or not he likes the origin of certain samples? Such an attitude is exactly the reason why one should

never tell an ‘independent’ laboratory about the origin of the samples to be analyzed, simply because ‘independence’ is

a very flexible term when it comes to controversial topics. What Prof. Dr. Roth has demonstrated here is only his

lack of professional honesty.”[14]


Dr. Richard Green


Dr. Richard Green, who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Stanford University, agrees with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue

found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassings with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible

alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers having blue staining. Green writes: “…the

discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible processes

could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that had been

soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is

premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes

that took place within those buildings.”[15]


Dr. Green’s speculation is absurd. Why would the Germans lean materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions

of HCN against the outside walls of the delousing chambers? Dr. Green is desperate to find an

alternative reason for the heavy blue staining on the outside walls of the delousing chambers.[16]


Germar Rudolf writes in regard to Dr. Green’s speculation:


One major rule of science is that it is impermissible to immunize a theory against refutation, here in particular by

inventing untenable auxiliary hypotheses to shore up an otherwise shaky thesis…This is exactly what Dr. Green

is doing: coming up with a ludicrous attempt at explaining a fact which does not

fit into his theory. Yet instead of fixing his theory, he tries to bend reality.”[17]


Dr. Green also challenges the possibility of formation of any noticeable quantities of Prussian Blue in the alleged homicidal

gas chambers. Dr. Green writes: “The difference in total cyanides (Prussian blue + non-Prussian blue) owes to the fact

that Prussian blue formed efficiently in the case of the delousing chambers but not in the homicidal gas chambers, and Prussian

blue once formed is likely to remain.”[18]


Dr. Green is not able to provide any convincing evidence why Prussian Blue would not form efficiently in the homicidal

gas chambers. For example, Dr. Green states that masonry in the alleged homicidal gas chambers has a neutral pH

value which does not allow for the formation of cyanide salts. Germar Rudolf writes: “But if that were true,

how come huge amounts of cyanides did accumulate in the walls of the disinfestation chambers?”[19]


Rudolf has documented with expert literature on the chemistry of building materials that the cement mortars and concretes

used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers are noticeably alkaline for many weeks, months, or even years. These walls

would have been very much inclined to accumulate cyanide salts and to form Prussian Blue, even more so than the lime

plaster of the disinfestation chambers.[20]




The alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau could not have been used to exterminate hundreds of

thousands of people as described in pro-Holocaust literature for numerous reasons: 1) they did not have escape-proof

doors and windows; 2) they did not have panic-proof equipment; 3) they did not have technically gastight doors and shutters;

4) they had no provision to quickly release and distribute the poison gas; and 5) they had no effective

device to ventilate or otherwise render ineffective the poison gas after the execution.[21]


By contrast, Germany built highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice

and save inmate lives. By one estimate, the SS at Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to bring the typhus

epidemics raging there under control.[22] An enormous amount of information exists concerning these German

delousing facilities[23], but no similar information exists regarding the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[24]


The roof of the semi-underground Morgue #1 of Crematorium II at Birkenau, which is said to have been the building’s

homicidal gas chamber, remains intact to some degree today. Contrary to eyewitness testimony, that roof has no

Zyklon-B-introduction holes. This has been acknowledged by pro-Holocaust researcher Robert Jan van Pelt. Since it is

impossible to close holes measuring 70 x 70 cm from a concrete roof without leaving clearly visible traces, it is certain

that no Zyklon-B-introduction holes ever existed at Crematorium II. Consequently, Zyklon B could not

have been introduced through the roof at this morgue as alleged by pro-Holocaust supporters.[25]


As documented in this article, chemists adhering to the orthodox Holocaust narrative have failed to explain why the walls

of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz/ Birkenau are permeated with Prussian Blue, while nothing of this sort can be

observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers. The only reasonable explanation is that Zyklon B

was never used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes:


…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp

let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’thappen.”[26]




[1] Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz:

Evidence From the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 137, 435.


[2] Richard J. Green, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, 



[3] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,”

in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and

Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 337. See the currently available edition of Leuchter’s report: Fred A. Leuchter,

Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition, 4th ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2015.


[4] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 7.


[5] Leuchter, Fred A., “The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 138-139.


[6] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,”

in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis

and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.


[7] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 9.


[8] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,”

in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL:

Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 369.


[9] Preface to: Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality,

Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, pp. 12-13.


[10] Butz, Arthur R., “Historical Past vs. Political Present,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, p. 15.


[11] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in theCanadian

“False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers  Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.


[12] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence

during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, David John Caldwell

Irving  vs. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001,

p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf,


[13] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality,

Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 66.


[14] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the

Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 342-345.


[15] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), pp. 18, 36, 41.


[16] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the

Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 347-349.


[17] Ibid., p. 348.


[18] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), p. 51.


[19] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—

A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 345.


[20] Ibid., pp. 345-346.



[21] Ibid., pp. 174-175.


[22] Ibid., pp. 175, 293.


[23] Berg, Friedrich R., “Zyklon B and the German Delousing Chambers,” Journal of Historical Review,

Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1986, pp. 73-94;  http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p-73_Berg.html.


[24] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the

Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 114.


[25] Ibid., pp. 143-147.


[26] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain:

Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.


Ernst and Ingrid Zündel. Never forgotten, always cherished. Their contribution to #Justice4Germans is immeasurable: 

The Desperate Measures To Enforce Belief In One & ONLY One Historical Event Are Escalating In Absurdity: Old Ladies Get Jail, Rapists Go Free</a




A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the
Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.

A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the
Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.
 The Holocaust of Truth Gilad Atzmon
Gilad Atzmon discusses the hate campaign against him, the shutdown
of free speech and his new book Being in Time: A Post-Political Manifesto.
Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist tells the story of how I first became
aware of revisionist arguments challenging the orthodox Holocaust story,
how it felt-how it felt was that it made me feel ashamed and made the palms
of my hands sweat-and the first information I had the misfortune (?) to
discover that there were serious questions to be asked about what I had believed
all my life, with all my heart, about the unique monstrosity of the Germans.

A 1997 speech on Internet Free Speech and Revisionism - Rae West.
This video includes Questions-and-Answers. Before the big revolution that
the Internet caused on media, consider the next seven points, taken into
consideration that some of this still happens now: 1. Revisionist criticisms
aren't new, but have been suppressed; 2. There have been and are many hard-working
revisionists; 3. The supposedly heavyweight historians don't debate;
4. No technical descriptions or investigations of 'gas chambers';
5. Damning 'confessions' were extracted under torture;
6. Demographic figures have been avoided, and mythology
substituted; 7. There are no photos of gas chambers.



Jewish ‘Auschwitz Survivor’ Admits He Lied About Everything..

 Joseph Hirt said he fabricated story of being sent to camp and meeting

Nazi doctor Josef Mengele to ‘keep memories alive’ about history of the Holocaust

by Theguardian

A Pennsylvania man who claimed for years to have escaped from Auschwitz,

met track and field star Jesse Owens and Nazi doctor Josef Mengele,

confessed on Friday that he had fabricated the entire story... of course.

“I am writing today to apologize publicly for harm caused to anyone because of my inserting myself into the
descriptions of life in Auschwitz,” Joseph Hirt, 86, wrote in a letter sent to his local paper, LNP, this week.

“I was not a prisoner there. I did not intend to lessen or overshadow the events which truly happened there
by falsely claiming to have been personally involved.”

“I was wrong. I ask forgiveness,” he added. “I determined at that moment to do everything in my power to
prevent the loss of the truth about wartime life (and death) at Auschwitz.”
For years, Hirt gave public speeches at schools around the US about his experiences in the second world war,
including his Jewish family’s flight from Poland to Belgrade.

But he also told people that he was arrested by the Nazis, sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz, and met

Hirt claimed to have escaped under an electric fence at the camp.

He added an extraordinary prologue and epilogue to the story, saying that he saw Adolf Hitler turn his back on Jesse
Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, and that he met Eleanor Roosevelt and Owens after his arrival in the United States.

Earlier this year, New York history teacher Andrew Reid became suspicious
of Hirt’s story and wrote a refutation of many of Hirt’s points.

The names of concentration camp victims and survivors are publicly
available, and there is no record of Hirt at Auschwitz or elsewhere.

Hirt (showing his fake tattoo in the photo above) admitted in his letter that he had tattooed the camp
number of Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi, the acclaimed author and chemist, on his left forearm:
“In no way an attempt to take on his identity, but in an effort
to incorporate his symbol as a way of remembering him.”

Reid also found that Hirt’s escape story did not fit with camp records, that Mengele did not arrive at the

camp until after the alleged escape, and other lies, errors and far-fetched claims in Hirt’s account.

He was a six-year-old Polish boy and extraordinarily unlikely to be anywhere near Hitler at the Olympics, for instance,

and Owens’ biographer found the snub was likely a fabrication, possibly conflated with another black sprinter’s story.

Hirt is not the first to fabricate or exaggerate a Holocaust story. Herman Rosenblat

, a Polish survivor, embellished his 1993 memoir and made up some parts entirely.

At the time, historian Ken Waltzer wrote in the New Republic

that he was alarmed by how quickly people accepted the story.

Read: Anne Frank — the Jewish Girl That DIDN'T Write the Famous Auschwitz Diary




Click on this text to examine the enormity of Jewish lies regarding the HOLOCAUST HOAX...



Click on this text to examine the truth about AUSCHWITZ.

Click on this text to watch a video titled INSIDE AUSCHWITZ that reveals the truth about the work camp.


The Hoax that won’t die


How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust


By Carolyn Yeager


the first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out by the Nazis in Poland

were supplied to newspapers around the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX


“the first authentic information about Hitler’s decision to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry came from an unnamed German

industrialist who visited Switzerland in July 1942 and informed a Jewish friend of the World Jewish Congress … HOAX


the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium

complex came from ‘two escaped Slovakian Jews’ working with the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX



The Holocaust is a hoax that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give it up.


Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians use. (‘Hoax’ derives from the magic

incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that it was deliberately created to deceive and gain advantage, and

continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda that got out of control, and indeed it has slipped out of

its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon, fueling the world-wide ‘campaigns

against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill of Jews and/or Israel.


But it is properly called a hoax because it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the World Jewish Congress

(WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe, Britain and the United States.


It was inspired by rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau

work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near the sprawling I.G. Farben ‘Buna’ Rubber Plant.


Some of these inmates organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish

Government-in-Exile in London. All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D.,

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later.


This year, as every year since a resolution was established in 2005 by a voice vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress

leads the way in recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.”

The media faithfully plays up the day, and governments throughout the Western world pay tribute.


Amazing when you think about its reach. THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants”

are joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day (however, it

looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government leaders, the

Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945

was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz camp was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army.


Yes, it’s amazing how much of our reality is created and developed without our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly

harmless (and usually disguised in moral terms) votes in large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies.


In the articles that I have previously published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians

and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already been presented. In this article I will pull all this information

together in an attempt to make the full case as to why the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far

more than to any other single entity. We will see that the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the

World Jewish Congress, and the final unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations came from the WJC, also.


The World Jewish Congress is the prime institution devoted to propagating Holocaust belief. Holocaust is

part and parcel of their other main aims of “defending Jews around the world” and “supporting Israel.”


Udo Walendy

We will begin with Udo Walendy, German historian, author and publisher, and his examination of a very important report published

in 1948 on the occasion of  the second plenary assembly of the WJC in Montreux, Switzerland. The title of the report is

Unity in Dispersion, a History of the World Jewish Congress.” It was published, and at the time I write can be read online here.


The World Jewish Congress is an openly Zionist organization. It’s name echos the first World Zionist Congress held in Basle,

Switzerland in the year 1897, convened by Dr. Theodore Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew.

Herzl’s portrait hangs in the office of the president at the WJC headquarters in New York City.


In the same spirit of uniting Jews to define and defend their interests, the World Jewish Congress was convened for the first

time 39 years later in Geneva, Switzerland by Dr. Stephen S. Wise, another Budapest-born offspring of rabbis who was brought to New York as an infant.


At this Congress, of which they bragged of having 230 delegates representing 32 countries around the world, the vast majority (181)

were from the United States, Poland, Roumania and Great Britain. From seven countries there was only one delegate, and from the rest,

between 2 and 10. The center of worldwide Jewish interests and leadership had moved to the United States after WWI.


Nahum Goldmann, left, and Stephen Wise, right, playing on American patriotism in 1942.


Prior to this first Congress in 1936, a preparative World Jewish Conference was held in August 1932, also in Geneva. It was chaired

by Dr. Nahum Goldmann, a Russia-born Jew who grew up in Germany. Some anti-Zionist German Jewish groups refused to participate.

Goldmann defined the purpose as to establish a legitimate collective representation of all 16 million Jews in the world. At this conference,

Nahum Goldmann and Stephen Wise were entrusted with the leading positions. At two more preparative

conferences in ’33 and ’34, the rise to power of National Socialism became a main subject.


[Also in 1936, Samuel Untermeyer, who had called for a holy war against Germany in 1933, founded a World Anti-Nazi Council

to Fight for Human Rights.” He partnered with British Unionist Walter Citrine, and the Council served as an Agent for “psychological warfare”

and – concealed from the public – was to be financed by the Jewish Defense Fund. Winston Churchill became one of its activists.]


At the 1936 Congress, Nahum Goldmann made the radical announcement that the existing sovereignty of nations should be

considered obsolete! The League of Nations should be reinforced (militarily, apparently) to safeguard

the interests of the weaker groups in the world. By these weaker groups he meant Jews.


“Millions of Jews in eastern Europe are being disenfranchised and terrorized

in the name of supremacy of the state and the dominant nation” he said, and

“Where the equal rights of a Jewish community are affected […] it becomes of common,

worldwide Jewish interest.” (Surrender of Jewish rights anywhere equals surrender everywhere.)


“We know that we can only succeed by joining forces with the many others in the world who must fight with us.”


Goldmann also said that mankind had to fight against “an aggression which was started by Germany,” emphasizing that

fighting against Hitlerism is one of the most important tasks” and that “anti-Semitism must be branded an international crime.”

He also stated that “propaganda is at present one of the main instruments of foreign politics,” with boycotts and international

intelligence services required to be used as weapons. Remember this was in 1936

when Hitler was still being admired for bringing Germany back to economic health!


Goldmann became President of the permanent Administrative Committee and Wise President of the Executive Committee.

In July 1940, the World Jewish Congress moved it’s headquarters to New York City, with the Geneva office continuing to exist

under 29-year old Dr. Gerhart Riegner and Dr. Abraham Silberschein, maintaining contact with German-occupied countries

and the International Red Cross.


WJC creates the Institute of Jewish Affairs as a research arm


In 1941, another section of the World Jewish Congress was founded as the “Institute of Jewish Affairs.” It was assigned the

task of gathering information from all parts of the world concerning Jewish affairs, with the aim of submitting Jewish demands

to the peace conference at the end of hostilities. The Jews were looking to get as much as they could out of the war – a war in

which they knew very well they were not physically fighting! They thus wanted to emphasize their losses as Hitler’s political victims.


In order to best situate themselves, they decided to consider the period from 1919 to 1939 an “armistice,” not a peace. They stressed

that a basis must be created by which “war crimes” could be punished retroactively from 1933. And of course,

they would be the victims of these war crimes.


In June 1942, the Advisory Staff for European Jewish Matters (of the Institute of Jewish Affairs) met in coordination with the

World Jewish Congress. Here, a demand was made for the first time that no peace negotiation should ever be carried out without

representatives of the WJC participating.


The Institute of Jewish Affairs entertained close relations with the Geneva office and the British Section of the WJC in London.

The British Section had built up a research staff of over thirty experts, allowing the Institute to compile a remarkable amount of

material, including thousands of documents, press reports, papers, projects, drafts and manuscripts ready for printing. Some of

the most important publications are:


  • Zorach Warhaftig, Starvation over Europe (1943);

  • Jews in Nazi Europe, Where Shall They Go? no authors named, (1941);

  • Hitler’s Ten Year War on the Jews (1943) (this book made a tremendous impression on the
  •  Allied governments and served as a basic textbook at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal)

An important paper transmitted to the American authorities was “The Conspiracy

against the Jewish People,” the main chapters of which were headed:


  1. The Originally Conceived  Plan of Extermination of the Jewish People

  2. The Different Stages of the Crime Against the Jewish People

  3. The Responsibility of Individuals and Organizations (translated from the German original)

In Europe in January 1942, the National committee of ‘Free France’ convened for a discussion on German war crimes. But not one

reference was made to the crimes against the Jews. So in February the World Jewish Congress asked for a specific statement with

reference to the “many and special crimes against the Jews.” It took three months before the President of the Conference on crimes,

General Wladyslaw Sikorski, replied that specifically referencing the Jews “might be equivalent to recognizing racial theories that

we all reject.” (Touché! We can see from this that not everyone was on the same page about who were the victims

of the Germans. Since the Poles evidently did not want to feature the Jews, the Jews went around them.)


After that rejection, the British section of the World Jewish Congress in June organized their own “Conference of the Press of the

Free World” where Facts of a Systematic Extermination of European Jewry were announced (but not revealed in the conference

minutes). This would have been the first suggestion of a planned extermination of Jews. Immediate reactions occurred in Britain and

abroad. The BBC transmitted this type of news for the first time—and there were mass demonstrations in the US (organized by Jews)

addressing war crimes and the need for the rescue of European Jewry. On 21 July 1942, Prime Minister Winston Churchill

sent a message to a meeting held in Madison Square Garden, NYC, which contained the following:


The Jews were Hitler’s first victims, and ever since they have been in the forefront of resistance to Nazi aggression.


The World Jewish Congress jumped on this and announced that “This sentence rightly characterized the Jews of whatever nationality as

an allied people of the United Nations (which is the name the Allies gave themselves at that time).

The WJC said they wanted all Jews to be accepted as “one nation” represented by the World Jewish Congress.


The Riegner Telegram

Gerhart Riegner

Sensing an opportune time, on 8 Aug 1942, young Gerhart Riegner, as Secretary of the Geneva WJC office, sent a telegram to

the British Foreign Office and the U.S. State Dept, through secure diplomatic channels the WJC was privy to. The telegram read:


Received alarming report stating that, in the Fuehrer’s Headquarters, a plan has been discussed, and is under consideration,

according to which all Jews in countries occupied or controlled by Germany numbering 3½ to 4 millions should, after

deportation and concentration in the East, be at one blow exterminated, in order to resolve, once and for all the Jewish question

in Europe. Action is reported to be planned for the autumn. Ways of execution are still being discussed including the use

of prussic acid. We transmit this information with all the necessary reservation, as exactitude cannot be confirmed by us.

Our informant is reported to have close connexions with the highest German authorities, and his reports are generally reliable.

Please inform and consult New York.


So, an anonymous report, and supposedly not the first from this ‘source’. The British Foreign Office took its time forwarding the

telegram, calling for it to be investigated first, and the State Dept. was also wary. It wasn’t until 3 weeks later on 28 August that it

reached Stephen Wise, WJC President in New York, who decided not to make it public. But this telegram is what the

WJC and its acolytes use to say the US and UK governments knew from 1942 that Jews were being exterminated.


The informant in this case is the “mysterious German industrialist” that Bradley Smith wrote about and concluded did not exist.

And he didn’t, until 40 years later, in October 1983 when it was claimed in the New York Times, without evidence, that he was

Eduard Schulte, a mining company executive who died in 1966 in Switzerland. Twenty years after his death, the death of his first

wife and one of his sons, and most who could contradict the story, Schulte is named as the ‘informer.’ Even Gerhart Riegner,

a life-long WJC executive, refused to confirm Schulte for the NYTimes, reportedly using as his excuse that “I have not identified

the man for 40 years and I see no reason not to keep the one request he ever made of me.” The mass of biographical and business

information written in the Times article is in no way evidence for the claim—its only purpose in being there

is to make it appear to those who don’t actually read that this is a big story with a lot information behind it.


There isn’t. There is none. But the current World Jewish Congress leadership thought it worthwhile to bolster their claim of

“inside information” about extermination plans coming directly from Adolf Hitler in 1942 by supplying the name of a real person

40 years after the fact.


Without a source given for it, the sentence that Schulte was “the first to tell the world about the extermination of Jews” has been

added to Wikipedia pages, such as here, here, here and here. This attempt to fool the public is in itself evidence

that there never was an informant, that the story was an invention of Gerhart Riegner and his WJC confidants.


At the WJC website this article characterizes the worth of the telegram far beyond what it actually was. Note the

words “reliable” and “authoritative” in the first paragraph, neither of which are at all appropriate, since it was hearsay.


The Making of the War Refugee Board


From 1942 to 1944, the World Jewish Congress continued to send messages to the State Department with information from

anonymous sources about atrocities taking place against Jews in German-occupied Europe.

Many were quite similar to the debunked false stories from WWI, and this was noted by State.


A conflict developed between the State Dept. and the U.S. Treasury Dept. headed by Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who was good

friends with the leadership of the World Jewish Congress. A particular disagreement was over a plan to ship 7000 Romanian

Jews to Palestine at a cost of $1200 per person. Apart from who would pay the money and how, there were British objections to

admitting Jews to Palestine. The State Dept. found it problematic, while Treasury and the World Jewish Congress were pressing

for the proposed project, insisting that the only alternative was death for the Jews at the hands of Hitler. From Wikipedia:


While the Treasury Department had granted the World Jewish Congress permission to send the money to Switzerland in July 1943,

the State Department used various excuses, delaying permission until December, a full eight months after the program was first proposed.


Jewish newspapers like this one from Omaha, Nebraska, played it up big.



Roosevelt was eventually drawn into this State vs. Treasury friction and, because of his close friendship with Morgenthau,

he backed the Treasury Dept. Just as the WJC had been pushing for, Roosevelt then agreed to assist in the escape of European

Jews with the creation of the War Refugee Board in January 1944. He placed in charge Morgenthau, Sec of State Cordell Hull,

and Sec of War Henry Stimson. However, the executive director was Morgenthau’s fair-haired

boy John Pehle, with Josiah DuBois as general counsel, making it Morgenthau’s board.


Not only that, but Morgenthau had delegated all of Treasury’s powers in the areas relevant to the WRB to Harry Dexter White,

later exposed as a Soviet agent. Thus, the Board became an instrument of Rabbi Wise and the Zionists, and as such its main

achievement was the booklet, German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau,

Executive Office of the President, Washington, Nov. 1944, hereinafter referred to as the WRB report.



Rudolf Vrba, born Walter Rosenberg

Alfred Wetzler, alias Jozef Lánik


According to revisionist Arthur R. Butz, this report constituted the birth of the official thesis of exterminations via gas chambers

at Auschwitz. Once Washington committed to the claim that Auschwitz was an extermination camp, the way was cleared for newspapers

to carry the story. It was placed on the front page of the New York Times on Nov. 26, 1944 with some excerpts given. It is

described as two reports, one written by “two young Slovakian Jews” and the other by “a Polish major” whom had been inmates

at Auschwitz from Spring 1942 until Spring 1944 when they escaped. All the essentials of the “Holocaust” are found in it.


You can read the Vrba-Wetzler Report in full here http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English45.pdf if you want to.

But I doubt you will want to. It’s very boring as is often the case with lies. At the end the author says:


I soon lost my comparatively comfortable job [October 1942?] with the Aufräumungskommando,

and as punishment was transferred to Birkenau, where I spent one and a half years.


I ask, what did a healthy young man do at Birkenau for a year and a half? It wasn’t known as a work camp. Of course, that assumes

that he was actually there. Examination shows that the information in the report is the sort of thing that could have been built up

from intelligence data. This is exactly what one should expect, as Germany’s enemies had the means of gathering information

about German camps and about events in Europe. The Communist Party, being “the world’s most efficient intelligence organization,”

could transmit any information desired to any destination without needing “escaped inmates” to supply the facts.




The WRB report was put into evidence at the International Military Tribunal on Dec. 14, 1945. There was no objection from

the defense and it was accordingly accepted as evidence. However at the later Farben trial, the defense objected to the report,

questioning the “competence and materiality of each and every document in the book” and the objection was sustained by that court.


It was undoubtedly the determined, even dogged efforts of the World Jewish Congress leaders and friends in pursuing the extermination

thesis that paid off in the end for Jews. From the summer of 1942, “Stephen Wise had continuously campaigned for the Allied

governments to take a public position directly condemning the alleged extermination of Jews in Europe.” It was J. Breckenridge

Long of the State Dept. who most strongly resisted the propaganda. Long never believed the talk of extermination, and wrote that:


Wise always assumes such a sanctimonious air and pleads for the ‘intellectuals and brave spirits, refugees from the tortures

of the dictators’ or words to that effect. Of course only an infinitesimal fraction of the immigrants are of that category –

and some are certainly German agents.


What we can say for sure is that, in the end, the World Jewish Congress has prevailed, and that it continues to work tirelessly both

for the Zionist cause of Israel and the welfare of every Jew in the world. What is one hoax more or less to them in the

face of such a monumental undertaking?







Click on this text to examine websites exposing the holocaust lies.



Click on this text to visit the CODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) page.



Click in this text to meet holocaust revisionist Germar Rudolf.



Click on this text to examine the HAAVARA Transfer Agreement (The Transfer Agreement between Germany and German Jews prior to WWII).







For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded

as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers.

Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia

Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers.

Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948

had to say about the world population of Jews.





Jewish World Population 1948

In other words, according to the World Almanac the world population of Jews

increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German

government under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses

should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.


The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations

made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the official three-volume report by the

International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000

concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews.

The following article elaborates.






  A Factual Appraisal Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red Cross

The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide


There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s

concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International

Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.


This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous

works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne

1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947).

The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object,

in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.


The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in

Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the

Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR,

whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.


The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained

in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes

the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for

political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73).

These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).


The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained

on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany.

They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from

February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon

established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until

the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.


Red Cross Recipients Were Jews


The Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about

1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition

to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen,

Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme,

Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany.

The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).


In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over

twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American

Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government

to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief

operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their

purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.


The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits

there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively

privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at

Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information

gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men

wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing

almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable

impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).


The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend

special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC

complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation

applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail

from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the

efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food

parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.


No Evidence Of Genocide


One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that

undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany

after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed

an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on

February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner

gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised

to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).


Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are

quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in

the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies”

(Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse

of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.


In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International

Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the

Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like

many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned

extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the

Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day.

So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps

were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945

broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in

gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only

the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to

take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).


Not All Were Interned


Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish

section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were

placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This

conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged

Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”


In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large

proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon

as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia

seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took

place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these

people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were

allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).


Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration

of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish

emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who

had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance

permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further

agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of

South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).


As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration

of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March

1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648).

Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union)

with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.


The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the

emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government

of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews

who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).


Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the

International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas

(this includes the above material), it did so accurately.


A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’

International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).


The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”.
 Regarding the quote below by Gerard Menuhin mentioning the "annihilation of millions of disarmed soldiers and
innocent civilains" after the German surrender, it needs to be understood that he was referring to German
soldiers and German civillians.
story denial 7

Click on this text to watch Natali Cohen Vaxberg, a radical Israeli political performance artist point out the fact that the "Holocaust" has been used to justify the Creation of Israel in 1948 and it's immoral army, the brutal and sometimes perverse persecution of Palestinians without interference from super-powers, and the creation of a nuclear weapons stockpile. BTW: a dreidel is a four-sided toy top played with during Hannukkah...





Click on this text to view: Cremation Technology vs the Holocaust...

Ernst Zundel and David Cole Discuss THE BIGGEST MYTH of the 20th and 21st Centuries AKA THE HOLOCOST







Footage allows the viewer to see more about Professor Robert Faurisson, who is arguably the one key individual in modern revisionism who opened the door for many more questions to be asked about the historiography, the narrative of what is now called the Holocaust and open the way for many more of those who would dare to openly question the Holocaust in a serious, much more objective manner free of dogma or ideology.


Fake shower heads

One more reason why the real gas chambers
had to have real shower heads

Like all strong poisons, hydrocyanic acid (HCN)
is very good at being water-soluble – and could
have been most effectively dispensed dissolved
in boiling water – or, better still, superheated
steam – run through the real shower heads.

Moreover, while a whole can of Zyklon B was
required to kill all insects in a relatively small
fumigation chamber, hardly more than one
scoop of the Zyklon
B pellets should have
been needed to dispatch any number of
humans in a shower room of any size.

Besides, only the lethal agent HCN was
required, Zyklon
B as such was unnecessary.
This more costly compound was specifically
developed for use in fumigation chambers,
where, not unlike any other dry cleaning
process, the fumigated clothes had to be
given back dry to the inmates coming out
of the shower rooms – as the properly run
camp routine demanded.

What's more, HCN itself – highly flammable
and potentially explosive – was superfluous
to the task, as, in an enclosed space, any
volatile noxious substance – such as cheap
as rubbish ammonia, for example – is just
as deadly, but reasonably safe to handle.

As the Jews themselves very well know,
they murdered numerous Palestinians just
by firing ‘harmless’ tear gas into their houses.

The more one reads the Holohoax literature
and the closer one looks at those putative
‘gas chambers’ – the less sense they make.
And the kosher Holo-mongers themselves
are keenly aware of this.
 And hence, those
once-obligatory Jewish ‘holes in the roof’ or
the later ‘holes in the wall’ – through which
the Zyklon
B was supposedly chucked in –
are hardly ever heard of anymore.

The Jewish Holohoax is getting assimilated.
It's no longer as Jewish and hysterical as
it used to be in the 1970s-80s, in the wake
of the October
(Yom Kippur)  War (1973-4),
when little I$rael  is said to have experienced
some ‘existential angst’ (enter Madison Avenue).

In their latter-day rendition, the physical details
of this ever-apocryphal Zio narrative get to be
more and more like the Holy Ghost – positively
invisible – and never again rendered in graven
 And the ‘venerable’ Anne Frank gets
to be more and more like the Holy Virgin...

(In fact, with HCN boiling point at 25.6 °C,
B couldn't have been used at room
temperature in fumigation chambers, either –
not without the special pulverizer/blower –
never ever mentioned in the whole
of the Holohoax literature in relation
to the putative gas chambers.)




In order to deprogram yourself, after an entire lifetime of incessant brainwashing by the JEW
owned and controlled media, you can begin almost anywhere... such as learning exactly
WHO coined the word "NAZI" - THE Most Misused Word in Any Language...
Here is the facts regarding JEW owned and controlled media
(Hollywood and Television in particular): http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id35.html

____________Holocaust Revisionism Articles____________  

As Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds
Australian Man’s Holocaust Story Labelled a ‘Lie’
Brighton Beach Holocaust Fund - Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years
Fraudster Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme
How Britain Tortured Nazi PoW’s

Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg

. . . by Lasha Darkmoon

Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures,

practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing.

Nuremberg defendants

(Above) German defendants at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials, 1946-1949.

How many of them had their testicles crushed?


“The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’ obtained by the use of  torture.”

 So begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer.


At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me some stomach-churning details

about testicle crushing. He ends his letter with these words : “This is what Jewish interrogators did to their

German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e., to confess to crimes they never committed.”


I was a bit shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a great deal,

nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing went on at

Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been

unaware that American  Jews had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers.


Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators,

I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human

depravity to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to

have sex with disinterred corpses.


Yes, so this is something we ought to bear in mind when watching all those Hollywood movies celebrating the heroic

deeds of the Allies in World War Two and lamenting the horrors of the Holocaust : that Jewish interrogators, working for

the Americans, are known to have beaten, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants before charging

them with war crimes at Nuremberg. Without these confessions, obtained under extreme torture, there is no solid proof

that any Jewish Holocaust took place at all. There is only legend, hearsay and “eyewitness accounts” : like those of

Elie Wiesel and his kind—accounts that have turned out, in retrospect, to be based on pure fantasy, fiction, and

grotesque exaggeration.


Proponents of the official storyline say that some of the strongest evidence that “proves” the Holocaust—i.e. the

systematic extermination of 6 million Jews in gas chambers on the instructions of Hitler—consists of the supposed

“confessions” of the German officials who were put on trial at Nuremberg. What they neglect to tell you is that most of

these confessions were obtained under extreme torture. Indeed, according to Jewish investigator John Sack, torture

was often practiced for its own sake, even when there was nothing to find out. It was practiced for sheer

pleasure: because it gave the torturers a ‘high’, a feeling of sadistic omnipotence, of orgasmic euphoria.


It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel Alexander Scotland, who ran the

interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction

of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture of German POWs occurred during the war to obtain

military intelligence. After the war was over, it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions of “war crimes”.


German POWs reported that the torture techniques included deprivation of sleep, starvation, systematic

beatings, ripping hair from the scalp, menacing with red-hot pokers, threatened use of electrical devices

to deliver shocks, and, finally, the worst torture of all, the slow and systematic mangling of the spermatic

cords of the testicles—a procedure that had their victims thrashing about and screaming

like wild animals for hours.


The prosecutors at Nuremberg accused and convicted the Germans of murdering some 4 million people at Auschwitz.

These charges were based largely upon the supposed “confessions” obtained by the torture of German officers, such

as the signed “confession” by Rudolf Hössthe commandant at Auschwitz,

giving details of how he had personally supervised the murder of 2.5 million jews.


In 1989, however, the Soviet government reduced the claim of the number killed at Auschwitz

 from 4 million to 1.5 million. (See picture below). This was later reduced to 1 million.



It became apparent at once that if only 1 million Jews had died at Auschwitz, as was now officially admitted, it no longer

became possible to state that 2.5 million Jews had been killed there under Höss while he was a commandant there. The

“confession” by Höss that 2.5 million Jews had been killed at Auschwitz  under his auspices

was therefore worthless. It had been a confession clearly extracted under torture.


If, moreover, only 1 million Jews perished at Auschwitz instead of the 4 million originally claimed to have

died there, it’s obvious that there has been an overestimate of three million dead Jews.  It is no longer

possible to assert that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust. That becomes a mathematical impossibility. 


And yet, incredibly, this mathematical impossibility is brazenly

asserted to this day in every mainstream media outlet.



We are all expected to pretend that 6 million Jews minus  3 million Jews somehow

equals 6 million Jews, just as Winston Smith (in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four) was

expected to believe that 2 + 2  = 5. Winston Smith, you will remember, managed to

believe this absurdity in the end, with the help of a little extra tuition he received via the famous

rat torture“.        


The startling revelation that almost all the German defendants at Nuremberg had had their testicles crushed

must make us sit up and think. How can testimonies obtained under testicle crushing be regarded in any way as reliable?


Following reports that defendants were tortured at the Malmedy massacre trial, the US Army formed the “Simpson Commission”

to investigate the alleged misconduct.  Judge Edward L. Van Roden was part of this commission. According to

Van Roden’s book, American Atrocities in Germany, out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals”

who were investigated by the commission—and who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal 

in Dachau after World War II—”137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.” 


Other methods used by the American interrogators included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners

and punching them in the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting

them on starvation rations, and subjecting them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were

then presented with prepared statements to sign. Confess or face more torture!


It emerged that Jewish prosecutors and interrogators had obtained complete control over the US Military

tribunal that was to put German officials on trial for war crimes. This is seldom mentioned, as to do so is

regarded as “anti-Semitic”. To state the unvarnished truth—that 137 Germans had their testicles mangled

at Nuremberg by largely Jewish interrogators in order to obtain proof for the Holocaust

—is regarded as “hate speech”.



Lt. William Perl (pictured above) was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940.

He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre.

This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or

Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly

9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. (See here).


Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. He was an ardent and active Zionist and was assisted by other

Jews in his endeavors to extract confessions by the infliction of maximum pain. Jews specalizing in

torture techniques at Nuremberg included  Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz. (See here)


This is what Wikipedia has to say about the interrogation of Germans at Malmedy:


“The accusations [against the German defendants]  were mainly based on the sworn and written statements

provided by the defendants in Schwäbish Hall. To counter the evidence given in the men’s sworn statements and

by prosecution witnesses, the lead defense attorney, Lieutenant Colonel Willis M. Everett

tried to show that the statements had been obtained by inappropriate methods.


Note that exquisite euphemism: “inappropriate methods”. That’s how respectable, politically correct Americans refer to

confessions obtained under torture. The methods are not described as horrendously cruel.

They are not described as morally indefensible. They are described as “inappropriate”.

On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg,

made the following observation in which he claimed that three out of four interrogators at Nuremberg were Jewish:


“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he said. “You know how strongly I feel toward those who

preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about

 seventy-five percent Jewish.”


One person who has made a close study of the Nuremberg trial archives in the original German and knows more about

this subject than anyone else I know is the multilingual American scholar Carlos W. Porter who is fluent in German, French,

Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Having renounced his American citizenship in 1984, and having then relocated to Belgium

with his wife and children, the Holocaust revisionist author of “Not Guilty at Nuremberg” took the trouble to write to me

about the Nuremberg trials in a private communication (July 28, 2015 at 9:55 pm). Porter confirmed what I had always

suspected: that most of the American interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jews, and that torture had been freely

practiced against the helpless Germans on trial in order to force them to confess to non-existent crimes:


“You can be absolutely CERTAIN,” Carlos Porter wrote to me, “that nearly ALL the interrogators and interpreters

in ALL the trials were Jewish, because the Americans stamped out the German language from all American

schools during WWI, so German Jewish refugees were almost the only competent people they had. Of

course, other “German-Americans” could not be trusted not to be “Nazis”, so they were stuck with the German Jews.


That there was a great deal of mistreatment and torture in the minor trials is absolutely certain. I reproduced

a couple of accounts of torture at the Dachau trials in “War Crimes Trials and Other Essays”. But I’m sure it’s

only the tip of the iceberg. Minor personnel could be tortured with impunity, and 99% of them would be

afraid even to mention it. It would be hard to get away with torturing somebody like Goering though.


There’s a lot of literature on the subject, more all the time. The Brits appear

to have been surprisingly enthusiastic torturers, whether Jewish or not.”


Testicle crushing, incidentally, is a tried and tested method for obtaining confessions. It was used throughout the

Middle Ages and particularly in France during the French Revolution. That the Jews, a scholarly race noted for their

vast erudition and academic achievements, should have mastered all the techniques of testicle crushing

is therefore not surprising. Their talents for acquiring such outré information must not be underestimated.


Though Perl had lots of German blood on his hands, he was nevertheless allowed by the Americans to serve as a

prosecutor at the Nuremberg War trials. Another Jew of note at the Nuremberg war crimes trials was Richard W. Sonnenfeldt.

He was the chief interpreter for American prosecutors such as Perl. He “interrogated” some of the most notorious

Nazi leaders of World War II and died in 2009, age 86, at his home in Port Washington, N.Y. (See here)


The Presiding Judge at Nuremberg was also—coincidence?—a Jew. His name was A.H. Rosenfeld and he was a

colonel in the American army. Col. Rosenfeld cheerfully admitted to torturing German prisoners of war as a matter of policy.

“We couldn’t have made those birds talk otherwise,” he remarked cynically. “It was a trick, and it worked like a charm.”



antisemitism_Shlomo_MorelIn a recent private email to me, in response to some of my queries about torture at Nuremberg, Thomas Goodrich,

acclaimed author of Hellstorm : The Death of NaziGermany (1944-1947),

mentioned the names of four well-known Jews in the American zone whom he identified as “torturer-inquisitors” :

Harry Thon, William Perl, AH Rosenfeld, and Shlomo Morel.


This last-named individual, Shlomo Morel (pictured right), was a particularly

nasty piece of work whom Goodrich describes as follows:


“a vicious monster who drowned men and women in outdoor latrines, who made them eat excrement, who

personally beat captives to death, and who forced women to kiss and make love with disinterred corpses.”


(For more grisly details, confirming all this, see here)


After escaping from the killing fields of Germany, where he had taken immense pleasure in dancing over mounds

of corpses and shedding rivers of human blood, this cruel psychopath  “lived out his life in comfort and ease in Israel.” 

Yes, Israel!the final bolthole and refuge dump for many a runaway Jew fleeing the long arm of the law, a place described

in a prescient comment by Adolf Hitler as early as 1925 as “a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” 

(Mein Kampf, chapter 11, excerpt.)


Here now are some grisly details about testicle crushing that the reader may find of some interest. These distasteful

details are given here only because they are relevant to our discussion. If you are of a queasy disposition and prone to

easy vomiting, you are advised to skip the description and stop reading right here. Remember that all this was done to

137 Germans at Nuremberg in order to extract confessions from them with a view to establishing the “truth”

about the Holocaust. Without all that testicle crushing, the Holocaust might have been much harder to prove.


“Standard practice [to obtain castration] in France from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution was to

crush the condemned’s testicles in a vise, which burst them as mush from the scrotum, then crunch the

spermatic cords with pliers. The condemned was turned upside down in order to maximize the blood flow

to his brain, after which he was unable to pass out or enter a state of shock until, perhaps,

the last few seconds of his ordeal.


The condemned was sure to vomit repeatedly with violent convulsions, even well after he had voided the

contents of his stomach, but he rarely screamed except for an initial shriek, which immediately silenced,

because the pain overwhelmed his ability to breathe. Most men would hang and thrash wildly during and

after the crushing of each testicle, and their thrashing would renew upon the crushing of each spermatic cord.


This torture method (accompanied by others) was usually reserved for the crime of regicide or attempted regicide.

The condemned was mercifully put to death afterwards, but his torture routinely lasted for the better part of a

day, witnessed by large crowds. It is interesting to note that, whereas most crowds were instructed to jeer,

mock, and ridicule the condemned, and did so even during a disemboweling, and drawing and quartering,

most crowds remained silent and stared with shocked expressions as a castration was carried out in this manner.


Onlookers, male and female, are recorded to have vomited at the sight of the spectacle.


Yes, they certainly knew what they were doing at Nuremberg! They were the experts.

Money Running Out for Needy Holocaust Survivors
Moshe Peer’s Astounding Holy Shoah Tale


Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 19
>The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent
expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value. 
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 21
>The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also
take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents
of the committees set up in the various  allied countries for the investigation of war crimes,
and of records and findings military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations. 
The Origin of the ’6 Million Jews’ Figure

The “Six Million” Myth

Test Your Holocaust Knowledge
Zyklon-B and the German Delousing Chambers
____Holocaust Revisionism Documentaries and Videos___
Buchenwald a Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil
David Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth
Ernst Zundel – Holocaust Debunked
Zundel vs. Zionist – Truth vs. Lies
Holocaust Faker Explains Himself
The Holocaust Lie by David Irving
Holocaust Revisionism: The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD
The Holocaust Testimonies You Didn’t Hear
Holocaust Hoax Exposed!
Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax
Made in Russia: The Holocaust – Carlos W. Porter
The Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber


One-Third of the Holocaust
Six Million Jews 1915-1938
Sylvia Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial
Spielberg’s Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie
The Phil Donahue Show – Holocaust Denial



Exposing the Holocaust™ Hoax


Ordered To Be Silent


Recite the Jews’ version of history

or face gag orders and/or jail time


The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth.

That makes the idea that you are living in a free country a willful delusion

from which no competent decisions about anything may be made.



By John Kaminski





You are no longer allowed to tell a story that is not approved by the Jews, especially if it involves holy

Holocaust defamation. Like a spreading stain of darkness slowly asphyxiating the minds of everyone

on Earth, the monstrous judicial invention that “truth is no defense” has unleashed the worst possible future upon

our lemming-like human species.


People are being snatched off the streets for daring to analyze their country’s provably criminal history.

A woman lampooning a well-known ethnic group is ordered to stay off the Internet for a year. And

anyone who dares speak critically about Jews in public, after first having their character

assassinated by a huffy Jewish spokesperson, is likely to be arrested by a very real thought police.


The stain of darkness has spread much further than you may have thought, but a quick scan of the

literature that has not yet been completely erased by Amazon and the other Jewish mind erasers reveals

the public knew more 80 years ago about the problem that has poisoned all life on this planet than we do today.


Those who claim to be involved in the quest for justice should take this assessment to heart, for the

time is running out for humanity’s best qualities as they are steadily being

erased by crazies who know nothing of compassion, humanity or justice.


Revisionists are telling the truth


You know the revisionists are telling the truth, that Holohoax is the proper term for all this Jewish

Holocaust hysteria, because you know by now — if you are even remotely conscious — that your

government is lying about everything it does, so if it says the Holocaust

was real, you’d automatically know it is lying to you . . . again . . . and still.


For instance, our government says it is fighting ISIS in Syria, and then we learn it is funding ISIS

in Syria through such third party operatives as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. This not the first time this

has happened. America’s longest war is now Afghanistan, and the same principles are at work. The

U.S. trains and funds the very people it is supposed to be fighting. We trained the

mujahadeen and they became al-Qaeda, paid by our Pentagon to be both friend and foe.


The purpose of all these tragic invasions is the same. In Afghanistan, 17 years of military adventurism

and many thousands of lives were spent to protect the poppy crop, providing fuel for the cycle of

depravity that funnels drugs to the streets, children into prison, and profits from slave

labor. In Syria, it’s the oil in the Golan Heights which Israel is already stealing.


The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth. That makes the

idea that you are living in a free country a willful delusion from which no competent decisions about

anything may be made.


The only thing Jews fear is the truth.


That’s why all these white countries that have been taken over by Jews are slamming people into jail

for challenging the bogus Jewish version of history. Unfortunately — due to Jews owning the majority

of media outlets around the world — the majority of the people

in the world tend to believe their well-distributed propaganda.


Like the official story of 9/11 that has long since fallen apart, or the now-debunked lies about the invasion

of Libya, which led to the mass invasion of migrants in Europe. Jew puppets Hillary and Obama

were responsible for the tragic debasement of Europe, which they triggered by their criminal assassination of

Libya and its beloved leader.


One hundred years of evidence clearly reveals that the Jews tell the truth about nothing, but nothing

they have done matches the lies they have told about what they did to the Germans during World War II.


These lies, and the twisted laws they have spawned, are inexorably strangling every country on Earth,

and every person on this planet. These laws prevent the perpetrators from humanity’s greatest

crimes from ever being apprehended, charged and convicted — because it would be anti-Semitic.


Zombie Germany


No one who knows the real history of the 20th century dares to travel to Germany — or any European

Union nation —  anymore. They will be slammed into prison for harboring unacceptable thoughts. 


As we speak Lady Michelle Renouf, attempting to attend the kangaroo court trial of the Schaeffer

siblings, fears suffering the same fate as Monika Schaeffer, the Canadian fiddle player who made a

humorous YouTube about her mother and the Holocaust, went to Germany to visit her brother Alfred,

and then was promptly snatched by the Holohoax police and slammed into prison with no charges

for many months.


She and her brother Alfred are in court this week, with their futures not bright and on the line.


This is banana republic garbage. In Germany there is no liberty or justice for those who understand

the worldwide Jewish mind scam. Now that Merkel has set the Africans free in Germany, one can

no longer expect any justice there. Renouf has to skulk around Stuttgart clandestinely

lest she be arrested by Jewish thugs and funneled off to jail for yet another trial.


And now for the first time, this mind virus has spread to England, where for the

first time a man has been jailed for daring to insist on the true facts of history. 


Jew cops in England


Jeremy Bedford-Turner — a.k.a. Jez Turner — was sentenced to 12 months for a 2015 speech he gave

criticizing a Jewish organization known as Shomrim, which is essentially a Jewish police force

that works closely with local police.


Prior to Turner’s hasty conviction, Andrew Joyce wrote:


Bear in mind that the Crown Prosecution Service has already told Gideon Falter—not once,

but several times—that Jez Turner has committed no crime. If Jez is now found “guilty” on

some trumped-up charge, the Crown Prosecution Service will not only lose all credibility

but the world will see for itself that Jez was right all along when he allegedly said:

“All politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune.”



Writer Robert Henderson wrote, 


But even with a jury the odds were heavily against a not guilty verdict. In the minds of

jurors must be the fear of being called a racist, a fear which has been so successfully inculcated

in the general population that it produces an automated reflex of panic and terror when faced

with the possibility of the label being stuck on them. Any juror faced with a case such as

this must have in the back of their minds that to return a not guilty would be to risk being

called a racist. There is also the sheer shock factor of hearing politically incorrect views being

unashamedly spoken. As it was the jury was out for less than two hours and returned a

unanimous version of guilty.



Long ago we knew more than we know now


Before World War II started, one observer wrote:


The press has degenerated under Jewish control and influence into lying propaganda agencies

whose chief mission appears to be to deceive and befuddle the people.

In Protocol 12 the Elders of Zion say of the Press:


“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already

being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose

offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be

already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

— George Armstrong, The Rothschild Money Trust, 1940, p.47


This Protocol was written before 1905. Seventy-eight years after this was written, the modern

world has much less an idea that Jews control everything, and the laws across Europe that prevent

debunking all these obvious Jewish lies are swallowing up people trying to point out the truth of history

one valiant martyr at a time.


Jews can’t prove 6 million died, but we can prove 273,000

died, not all of them Jews, in the German labor camps.


To think of all the false Jewish stories about fake Holocaust stories told by pathetic wretches

in search of celebrity is to contemplate the spectrum of human psychological disorders.


So, the long and short of it is, you may not even think about a story that affects

Jews negatively, because this has been determined to be a crime against the state.


Perhaps you can think of other things that the Jews appear

to be out to take from you, beyond your ability to think for yourself.




John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why
we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise.

British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!

British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!

British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!

British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!

Greetings ladies and gentlemen. A few days ago an article about
your humble author appeared at the Holocaust Controversies
blog written by a certain Hans Metzner. Titled Panagiotis Heliotis -
The New Star Shining in the Revisionist Coffin?

This is the last of a series of parts on the same topic. And what a topic that is! 
If you have missed the previous parts you can find them here or on our
You Tube Channel. 






Review of Auschwitz Forensically Examined

Auschwitz—Forensically Examined by Cyrus Cox summarizes the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz

was not an extermination camp. This article will review some of the important points mentioned in this book.


The Chemistry of Auschwitz


Forensic tests show that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing

in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue, a compound of cyanide and iron readily discernible by a

distinctive deep blue color. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of

the delousing facilities have Prussian Blue staining. On the other hand, nothing of this sort

can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[1]


Cyrus Cox writes:


While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged

homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all… The simplest explanation for this is that

there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, plain and simple.[2]


Proponents of the orthodox Holocaust story, however, cannot concede that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in

the alleged-homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. They have made the following attempts to

explain away the results of forensic tests showing no significant cyanide residues in the alleged gas

chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:[3]


1)   The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that claimed not to have understood how it was

possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen-cyanide gas.

The researchers therefore adopted methods that excludedPrussian Blue and similar iron/cyanide compounds from

their analyses. Their assumptions made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen

cyanide and those which were not: all would have a “cyanide residue” of close to zero. The Kraków researchers concluded

from their deliberately crippled analyses that, since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all had similar

amounts of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[4]


Cox dismisses this Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:


The cockeyed blabber about not understanding or about blue wall paint is egregious

flimflam at best; in reality, however, it is a lie to confuse the audience.[5]


2)   Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity

as the laboratory manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron

and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of

the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply into porous materials such as brick and iron.[6]


Dr. Roth later changed this testimony in a 1999 movie titled

Mr. Death produced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:


Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns

in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go

looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[7]


Cox writes in regard to Dr. Roth’s statement in Mr. Death:


That was a lie. To hydrogen-cyanide gas, plaster and mortar are as permeable as a sponge is to water… Roth knows

this, because when he testified under oath at the 1988 Zündel trial, he truthfully said: ‘In porous materials such

as brick and mortar, [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open’…[8]


3)   Dr. Richard Green, who says “I am not embarrassed to call Holocaust denial hate speech,” agrees with Germar Rudolf

that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassing with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green

offers a possible alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers have blue staining. Green writes:


[T]he discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible

processes could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that

had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is

known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings

owes its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.[9]


Cox writes concerning Dr. Green’s statement:


Which absurd auxiliary thesis will come next? Maybe the one by Dr. Richard Green, who seriously proposed that

the cyanide residues in the disinfestation chambers did not stem from fumigations, but were caused by objects

leaning against the wall which had been soaked in a “hydrogen-cyanide solution”? Where then do

the cyanide residues close to the ceiling, in the middle and outside of the wall come from?[10]


4)   French biochemist and Auschwitz veteran Dr. Georges Wellers provides another explanation by stating that humans

are considerably more sensitive to hydrogen cyanide than insects. The homicidal gassings at Auschwitz/Birkenau thus

were conducted with smaller amounts of hydrogen cyanide over shorter times. Wellers says the victims would have

inhaled almost all of the hydrogen cyanide, so there presumably was nothing left to react with the masonry.[11]


Cox writes that Wellers’s explanation overlooks several things:


  1. Executions in U.S. gas chambers took on average around nine minutes before the victims were dead;

  2. The Zyklon B used in Auschwitz/Birkenau slowly discharges its toxin over a period of one to two hours,
  3. in contrast to US methods, in which a cyanide “egg” virtually “boils” in a pot of pure sulfuric acid;

  4. None of the alleged-homicidal gas chambers used in Auschwitz/Birkenau had devices such as warm-air blowers
  5. to aid evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide. Such devices were part of the standard equipment of the disinfestation
  6. chambers used in that period (the gas chambers are said to have used
  7.  precisely the same form of Zyklon B as did the disinfestation chambers);

  8. The concentration of toxic gas in the chambers would have steadily increased for one or two hours; therefore,
  9.  ventilation of the chamber before the complete evaporation
  10.  of the hydrogen cyanide would have been of no avail; and
  11. The victims before dying could have inhaled only an insignificant part of the
  12.  hydrogen-cyanide gas that would have been in the homicidal gas chambers.[12]

Cox lists several additional factors indicating that the alleged-homicidal gas chambers had a significantly

higher tendency of forming long-term-stable cyanide residue than the disinfestation buildings. He concludes:


In the masonry samples of the underground morgue, we should find approximately similar residues as in

the disinfestation chambers, if not even more, provided that the stories told by the witnesses are true.[13]


The Cremations of Auschwitz


Cyrus Cox debunks eyewitness testimony claiming that gigantic flames burst from the chimneys of the crematories

of Auschwitz/Birkenau. The construction blueprints show that the flues and the chimney of the largest crematories in

Auschwitz/Birkenau each had a length of about 15 meters. The coke and coal used to fuel the furnaces burn with a short

flame not exceeding half a meter. This fuel could not even have produced flames that protruded out of the cremation muffles.[14] 


Many witnesses also claim that smoke constantly covered all of Auschwitz/Birkenau. However, none of the aerial photos

taken of Birkenau by Allied reconnaissance planes since late May 1944 shows a column of smoke from any of the crematories.

This is so even though these facilities were allegedly cremating the Jews deported from Hungary at their peak capacity.[15]


The capacity of the Auschwitz/Birkenau crematories has also been exaggerated by proponents of the official Holocaust story.

The crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau had muffles with doors 1.97 feet in width and height, and were meant to cremate

only one corpse at a time without casket. The full incineration of a single corpse took about an hour.[16] If one considers

that the furnace had to be cleaned daily from ash and cinders, a coke-fired crematory

could be operated for a maximum of only about 20 hours per day.[17]


There effectively were never more than 38 cremation muffles concurrently operating at Auschwitz/Birkenau.

Their theoretical maximum daily capacity on a 20-hour-per-day operational schedule amounts to:


38 muffles x 20 hours x 1 corpse/hour = 760 corpses.


Since single furnaces or even complete crematories had to be shut down on occasion for necessary repairs, and since

the furnaces were often operated by unskilled detainees, one can assume that the actual cremation capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau

was significantly lower.[18] There was never enough capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau

to cremate 4,800 corpses per day as alleged by pro-Holocaust historians.[19]


A set of documents has been preserved showing the quantities of coke delivered to Auschwitz/Birkenau in the period

from February 1942 to October 1943. These documents show that the new crematories at Birkenau weren’t used as

intensively as the old one at the Auschwitz main camp, and that there was not enough fuel delivered to cremate the

additional hundreds of thousands of corpses claimed to have accrued at Auschwitz/Birkenau. These documents

also show that coke deliveries starting in March 1943 approximately match the

numbers of dead reported in the Auschwitz/Birkenau Death Books. [20]


Cox does acknowledge that approximately 13,000 corpses were buried in mass graves in Birkenau in 1942 because

deaths from a typhus epidemic exceeded the limited cremation capacity in the camp at the time. Most of these bodies

were later exhumed, with many bodies probably directly burned on pyres.[21] However, Cox says a photograph taken

of Birkenau on May 31, 1944 provides irrefutable proof that the alleged incineration of Hungarian

Jews on enormous outdoor pyres has been nothing other than a gigantic propaganda lie.[22]


Carlo Mattogno agrees with Cox’s analysis. In his book Auschwitz: The End of a Legend,

Mattogno states in regard to Allied aerial photographs taken at Birkenau on May 31, 1944:


It is pointed out also that the aerial photographs taken by the Allied military on 31 May 1944, at the crucial time

of presumed extermination, on the day of the arrival at Birkenau of about 15,000 deportees, and after 14 days

of intense arrivals (184,000 deportees, averaging 13,000 per day) and with an extermination toll (according to Pressac’s

hypothesis) of at least 110,000 homicidally gassed, which would have had to average 7,800 per day, every single

day for 14 consecutive days; after all of that, the photographs do not show the slightest evidence of this alleged

enormous extermination: No trace of smoke, no trace of pits, crematory or otherwise, burning or not, no sign of dirt

extracted from pits, no trace of wood set aside for use in pits, no sign of vehicles or any other type of activity in the

crucial zones of the courtyard of Crematory V nor in the earth of Bunker 2, nor in Crematories II and III.

These photographs constitute irrefutable proof that the story of extermination of the Hungarian Jews is historically unfounded.[23]     


Suppressing Evidence


Cox describes the first independent forensic report on Auschwitz:


In 1972, the two architects Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl, who were involved in the planning and construction of

the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau, had to stand trial in Vienna for assisting in mass murder. The Auschwitz

Museum had sent the Viennese court the construction plans of these buildings. Because the judges found themselves

incompetent to evaluate these plans, they tasked the Viennese architect Gerhard Dubin, a certified engineer, to

examine these designs to ascertain whether the spaces denoted by the Auschwitz Museum as execution

chambers could have been used as such or could have been restructured for such use. Dubin answered “No” to

both questions in his expert report. This was one of the reasons why both defendants were ultimately acquitted

by the jury. Subsequently, an unknown person removed Dubin’s embarrassing (for the orthodoxy) expert report

from the trial records, because today it is not to be found there. This destruction

of evidence is not only grossly anti-scientific, it is also a criminal act.[24]


The Holocaust orthodoxy continues to suppress evidence to this day. Publicly disputing the official Holocaust narrative

is a crime in some 19 countries. Moreover, in Germany it is prohibited by threat of punishment to file a motion with the

court to admit evidence seeking to prove that revisionist statements are correct. The reason given is that such motions

constitute “Holocaust denial” and would therefore be a criminal act during a public trial. Accordingly,

several defense lawyers have been sentenced simply because they filed such a motion.[25] 


Holocaust revisionist writings cannot even be read in court in modern-day Germany. Cox writes:


In order to keep the public in the dark about the fact that the defendants are being sent to the dungeon for entirely

harmless and scientifically well-based statements, their writings for which they are on trial are moreover not read out

in the courtroom, which would normally be obligatory, but the trial participants—judges,

prosecution, defense—are ordered to read the material by themselves at home.


Ever since the introduction of these measures, silence has been once more every

citizen’s primary duty in German courtrooms. Shut up, and don’t you dare protest![26]     




Auschwitz—Forensically Examined provides an excellent introduction to the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz/Birkenau

was not an extermination camp. Readers who are interested in a more detailed analysis of the forensic

evidence can read books written by Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno to gain additional insights. 


Cyrus Cox states the primary reason for knowing that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:

“While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged

homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all.”[27] Pro-Holocaust historians have yet to provide a

credible explanation why no significant presence of cyanide residue has been

found in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.


Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes: “…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II

labour camp let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’t happen.”[28]    




[1] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.

[2] Cox, Cyrus, Auschwitz—Forensically Examined, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2019, pp. 41, 53.

[3] Ibid., p. 41.

[4] Rudolf, Germar. op. cit., pp. 368-369.

[5] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 40.

[6] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers  Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.

[7] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, David John Cawdell Irving  v. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf.

[8] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 42.

[9] Richard J. Green. “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, p. 18. http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/.

[10] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 54.

[11] Ibid., p. 42.

[12] Ibid., pp. 42-45.

[13] Ibid., pp. 45-47.

[14] Ibid., pp. 57-58.

[15] Ibid., pp. 59-60.

[16] Ibid., pp. 61-62.

[17] Ibid., pp. 64-65.

[18] Ibid., p. 66.

[19] Ibid., p. 61.

[20] Ibid., pp. 67, 70-71.

[21] Ibid., pp. 69-70.

[22] Ibid., p. 84.

[23] Mattogno, Carlo. Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Newport Beach, Cal.: The Institute for Historical Review, 1994, p. 32.

[24] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., pp. 21-22.

[25] Ibid., pp. 92-94.

[26] Ibid., p. 95.

[27] Ibid., p. 41.

[28] Kollerstrom, Nicholas. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.






 By Mike King


Of the many sub-fables spun off of the grand fable of “Auschwitz ,” the most shocking and

enduring is the myth of that evil, sadistic, mass-murdering monster whose name ranks behind

only those of Adolf Hitler and SS Chief Heinrich Himmler on the all-time scary dude list.

The notorious camp doctor known for conducting live invasive experiments on Jewish inmates

has long since been immortalized in articles, books and films. You know the name –

none other than the big bad Dr. Josef Mengele (cue dramatic piano music) --

aka "The Angel of Death ." (cue even more dramatic piano music)


There is, however, just a wee little problem with this official narrative of the big bad Mengele..

To put it bluntly, just like those long-since discredited tales of shrunken heads, lamp shades &

soap made from dead Jews, “zee gas chambers ,” and babies being tossed into open fire-pits

– the Myth of Mengele is, well, bullshit from start to finish!


Mengele-Mania has generated lots of shekels for lots of writers and film makers.

Image result for mengele Image result for BOYS FROM BRAZIL


Image result for mengele books



The Three Biggest Lies About Dr. Mengele

1.   He condemned inmates who could not work to death in the gas chambers

2.   He conducted cruel experiments with twins.

3.   He conducted other cruel medical experiments on random inmates


Let us debunk:


1. Mengele and the Gas Chambers

This one is easy because we absolutely know, for certain, that there were no gas chambers at

Bullschwitz or any other internment camp! If you’re new to “Holocaust Denial ,” here are

a pair of powerful pieces (to read later) which will – unless you are in deep denial – forever

dispel the silly notion of “zee gas chambers ” (here & here). Hence, how could

Dr. Mengele have condemned people to die in "gas chambers " that never even existed?


Image result for gas chambers hoax Image result for holocaust hoax books breaking the spell

The "gas chambers" lie has been debunked so thoroughly that Amazon had to be pressured by
"the usual suspects" into banning many books about the Holohoax and World War II.

2. Mengele and Experiments on Twins

If the alleged experiments Mengele is alleged to have performed with twins were so cruel and

deadly (like sewing twin babies together in an attempt to artificially create conjoined “Siamese Twins!”

--- ha ha ha ha ha -- yeah, right!), then how were most of the twins enrolled in his research able

to survive the war and then, in 1984, form an association which still lobbies for their interests?

The organization / museum is named “CANDLES” (Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab

Experiment Survivors). In fact, they, their descendants and their advocates are still

raking in shekels off of Mengele's wrongly tarnished name (cha ching!). (here)

Now just focus on the name of that organization for a bit and ask yourself: How the frickety-frack can

“deadly lab experiments” leave any so many "survivors?" The evidence – or lack thereof – is very

clear: Mengele did not commit any crimes on the Jewish twins. An anthropologist in addition to

being a physician, Mengele's research was limited to behavioral / observational studies only – nothing surgical.

Image result for mengele Image result for CANDLES&amp;rdquo; (Children of Auschwitz 

1. Twins Jiri and Josef Fiser were studied by Mengele, and "survived" to tell tales

about it. // 2  & 3: Twin Eva Kor gives speeches on how she "survived" Mengele.


3. Mengele Randomly Conducted Other Cruel Experiments

The “eyewitness” testimony as to the medically senseless and cruel experiments supposedly

performed by Mengele (changing eye colors by dye injections, removing healthy teeth just for

the fun of it, transplanting organs to random places in the body -- ha ha ha ha ha --yeah, right!)

ring as absurd and untrue as stories of shrunken heads and lamp shades.

But because the “survivors ” have been sainted, none dare to question them.


Interestingly, the “victims” of these monstrous experiments, never showed any signs of these

cruel procedures. There was never even the slightest bit of evidence to support the claims of these “survivors” -- 

no documents, no autopsies. Nothing!

Image result for mengele experiments Image result for mad dentists

1. Mengele also studied dwarfism. Above, the 7 dwarfs of the Ovitz family. // 2. Tales of

Mad Mengele torturing Jews by ripping out healthy teeth just for his amusement are totally without basis,

and not even worth rebutting.


Who Really was Josef Mengele?


Before the war, the brilliant Mengele, after studying philosophy, went on to earn doctorates in

anthropology and medicine. His main career focus was as a researcher – hence, the observation

of twins, dwarfs and others at Auschwitz. During the war, Mengele was awarded the Iron Cross 2nd Class,

and then an Iron Cross 1st Class for his bravery in rescuing two men from a burning tank.

After being seriously wounded in action on the eastern front in 1942, he was declared unfit for

active service and then transferred to Auschwitz where he served as a doctor and researcher.


Now, here’s the kicker. Dr. Mengele, as one of the lead physicians in a camp afflicted from time

to time with outbreaks of typhus, worked tirelessly to save lives – not take them! The Zyklon B

“gas” was a pesticide used to kill lice, not people. Furthermore, under the jurisdiction of Mengele,

and other camp doctors, an estimated 3000 Jewish babies were born and cared for at Auschwitz.

True story, boys and girls. Read "The Auschwitz Baby Boom" (here)


Image result for A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at AuschwitzImage result for A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at Auschwitz Image result for mengele experiments

1. Drawing depicts Dr. Eduard Wirths -- an Auschwitz doctor and colleague of Mengele's --

as a valiant knight waging battle against deadly typhus-carrying lice. // 2. SS officers at Auschwitz.

From left to right: Richard Baer, Josef Mengele, Josef Kramer, Rudolf Höss // 3.

Many of the Jewish babies born at Auschwitz "survived" and lived long lives.


About four years after the end of the war, Mengele, a true-believing SS man, escaped to Argentina

-- where he lived for about 10 years while working as a carpenter. He then fled to Paraguay in

1959 and Brazil in 1960. Now a most-wanted fugitive, Mengele was being hunted by the

United States, West Germany, Israel, and independently by the hideous “Nazi hunter,” Simon Wiesenthal

of "babies in the bon-fire" fame. He eluded capture in spite of extradition requests

by the West German government and covert operations by Israel’s Mossad.


Headline: New York Times (May 11, 1985)

Three Nations Joining to Hunt Mengele 

By Ralph Blumenthal (cough cough)


The article as it originally appeared.  Image result for mengele wanted
In time, the hate-filled psychopaths came to believe their own dirty lies about noble Dr. Mengele
-- Image 1: NY Slimes front page story // Image 2: Lots of shekels were offered to locate Dr. Mengele.



Unbeknown to his hunters at the time -- the good doctor, philosopher, anthropologist, decorated

war hero, gentleman, scholar, humanitarian and carpenter died in 1979, at the age of 67, after

suffering a stroke while swimming off the coast in Brazil. (Or did Mossad finally get him "on the

down low?") He was buried under a fake name. According to his only child, his son, Rolf, Dr. Mengele

maintained his innocence until the end. We totally believe him. And, given all the other lies

we’ve been fed about everything else related to The Bad War -- you should too.





How Danuta Czech Invented

100,000 Gassing Victims

An Analysis of the Auschwitz Chronicle

– Part 1: 1942



Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle are one of the most important secondary sources on

the history of the Auschwitz Camp.[1] The information found in it is a major basis for a large

body of literature dealing with the Auschwitz Camp. All the more important it is, then, to

verify whether the data contained in it is accurate. The following paper looks into the reliability

of data contained in the Chronicle dealing with mass deportations mainly of Jews[2] from

all over Europe to Auschwitz in 1942. It compares the data contained in the primary

sources quoted by Czech with what Czech herself claims about them.



Previous Research

Already in 1994, the Spanish revisionist Enrique Aynat published a booklet that contains

a critical article on the way Danuta Czech determined the fate of the Jews deported from

France and Belgium to Auschwitz in 1942.[3] He pointed out that the only source Czech

relied upon regarding arrivals at Auschwitz were handwritten lists of registration numbers

assigned to the deportees which were clandestinely compiled by inmates and smuggled

out of the camp in 1944. These lists contain the date of an arriving transport, the registration

numbers assigned to male and female deportees, and in many but not all cases the location

whence these transports had come. It is not known how reliable these lists are. After all,

they were compiled by individuals naturally hostile to their captors. It is important to emphasize,

however, that these lists do not contain any information about inmates arriving at the

camp who were not registered, and if such deportees existed, what their fates were.


Extant documents from the German wartime authorities in France, Belgium and the Netherlands

are more detailed about the persons deported to Auschwitz, since among them are lists

containing not only the exact number of deportees sent to Auschwitz with every transport,

but also the deportees’ names, among other things. Hence it is known that not every person

deported on a certain train to Auschwitz was admitted to that camp on the train’s arrival

(the journey usually took two days). The central question is: what happened to the persons

put on a train at the point of origin who were not registered at the Auschwitz Camp? The

(obligatory) mainstream hypothesis is that, by and large, these persons simply perished

“in the gas chambers” at Auschwitz.


In his 1994 paper, Aynat put forward a number of arguments disputing that claim,

among them German wartime documents indicating that Jews fit for labor where sent to

Auschwitz for the purpose of labor deployment, whereas those unfit for work were meant

to be deported not to Auschwitz but to the “Government General”, i.e., occupied Poland.

Since during the war Germany had incorporated the area around Auschwitz into its

province of Upper Silesia, in their eyes Auschwitz was a part of Germany, not of occupied Poland.


Aynat discusses in some detail the fact that, for the various resistance movements highly

active inside and outside the camp, Auschwitz was virtually transparent, as information

about what was going on inside the camp was frequently and easily reported to the

various headquarters of the resistance. In other words: nothing could be kept a secret at

Auschwitz. However, when analyzing the documents produced by the Polish government in

exile regarding Auschwitz, it becomes clear that the sensational news of conveyor-belt mass

murder in chemical slaughterhouses does not play a major role, and that the claims (not)

made in these documents to a large degree undercut today’s mainstream narrative.

[4] Aynat also discusses several wartime sources and documents pointing to

the fact that Jews sent to Auschwitz were in some cases shipped further east.


A year after Aynat’s initial book on the topic was published, the Auschwitz Museum

published a five-volume work on the so-called Death Books (Sterbebücher) of Auschwitz

containing detailed information on almost 69,000 inmates incarcerated at Auschwitz –

meaning officially registered there – who had died there. Aynat subsequently did the Herculean

work of matching, one by one, the names listed on the deportation lists of transports originating

in France with those listed in the Death Books in order to match them, so the fate of these

deportees could be determined. His results show that many if not most of the French Jews

deported to and registered at Auschwitz tragically died there, probably mainly due to the

catastrophic typhus epidemic which raged in this camp starting in early 1942.[5]


The present paper will look in a more-detailed fashion into how Danuta Czech handled the

sources she had at her disposal to come to the claims she made in her Chronicle about

the number of Auschwitz deportees allegedly killed in gas chambers. I will focus here

exclusively on deportees sent to the camp with major deportation transports organized by

Germany’s Reichssicherheitshauptamt (RSHA, Reich Security Main Office), the National-Socialist

equivalent to the current U.S. Department of Homeland Security, so to speak. A

considerable number of deportees from these transports are said to have been sent,

without registration, straight from the railway ramp to the gas chambers. I will establish in

this paper how Czech makes that determination based on the evidence adduced. I will not

discuss the many claimed gassings of usually smaller batches of inmates which had been

properly admitted to and registered in the camp but which are said to have met their gruesome

end in the gas chambers later due to some more-or-less-arbitrary decision by the SS

administration or some SS physician. The gassings resulting from these so-called “selections”

among regular prisoners have been thoroughly discussed elsewhere by Carlo Mattogno, where

he shows how the extant documentation in many cases clashes with claims of mass murder.[6]



The Data


The following table contains data about all the entries in Czech’s Chronicle referring to

arrivals of deportation transports at Auschwitz which are mentioned either in extant documents

by the German authorities responsible for these deportation trains, and/or in the clandestinely

compiled list of registered arrivals mentioned earlier.[7] The meaning of each column is as follows:


Column 1: The train’s date of arrival at Auschwitz;

also the respective entry in Czech’s Chronicle.


Column 2: Number of arriving inmates according to D. Czech. In some case, Czech either

gives no number or indicates by the way she expresses herself that she does not know

how many inmates were on that transport (“etwa” in the German edition; “approximately”

in the English edition). In these cases, I entered three question marks for cases where

Czech makes no assumptions, followed with a number in parentheses

in cases where she speculates about the total number of deportees.


Column 3: point of origin; this derives either from the clandestine list of assigned registration

numbers or from other extant wartime documentation. In some cases, this is based merely

on temporal correlation with an event claimed elsewhere (Norway, Luxemburg). In that

case, I have entered a question mark with Czech’s speculation given in parentheses.


Column 4: number of registered females according to the clandestinely compiled lists of registration numbers.


Column 5: number of registered males, as above.


Column 6: sum of previous two columns.


Column 7: percentage of deported inmates registered at Auschwitz.


Column 8: Number of deportees not registered at Auschwitz with unknown fate.


Column 9: fate of claimed unregistered deportees according to Czech.


Column 10: proof adduced by Czech to support here claim about the fate of unregistered

deportees. In case the total number of deportees is unknown/uncertain but she makes

a claim in this regard anyhow, her source for that number is given, if she has any.


Date arrivals from reg. male reg. female reg. total reg. % unreg. unreg. fate proof
3/26/1942 999 Slovakia   999 999 100% 0    
3/28/1942 798 Slovakia   798 798 100% 0    
3/30/1942 1112 France 1112   1112 100% 0    
4/2/1942 965 Slovakia   965 965 100% 0    
4/3/1942 997 Slovakia   997 997 100% 0    
4/19/1942 1000 Slovakia 464 536 1000 100% 0    
4/23/1942 1000 Slovakia 543 457 1000 100% 0    
4/24/1942 1000 Slovakia 442 558 1000 100% 0    
4/29/1942 723 Slovakia 423 300 723 100% 0    
5/22/1942 1000 Slovakia     1000 100% 0    
6/7/1942 1000 France     1000 100% 0    
20/6/1942 659 Slovakia 404 255 659 100% 0    
6/24/1942 999 France 933 66 999 100% 0    
6/27/1942 1000 France 1000   1000 100% 0    
6/30/1942 1038 France 1004 34 1038 100% 0    
7/4/1942 ??? Slovakia 264 108 372 - “rest” gassed none
7/8/1942 1170* France     1170 100% 0    
7/11/1942 ??? Slovakia 182 148 330 - “rest” gassed none
7/17/1942 2000 Netherlands 1251 300 1551 78% 449 gassed Höss
7/18/1942 ??? Slovakia 327 178 505 - “rest” gassed none
7/19/1942 928 France 809 119 928 100% 0    
7/21/1942 1000 France 504 121 625 63% 375 gassed none
7/22/1942 931 Netherlands 479 297 776 83% 155 gassed none
7/23/1942 827 France 411 390 801 97% 26 gassed none
7/24/1942 1000 France 615 385 1000 100% 0    
7/25/1942 ??? Slovakia 192 93 285 - “rest” gassed none
7/25/1942 1000 Netherlands 516 293 809 81% 191 gassed none
7/26/1942 1000 France 370 630 1000 100% 0    
7/28/1942 1010 Netherlands 473 315 788 78% 222 gassed none
7/29/1942 990 France 248 742 990 100% 0    
7/30/1942 1000 France 270 514 784 78% 216    
8/1/1942 ??? Slovakia 165 75 240 - “rest” gassed none
8/2/1942 1052 France 693 359 1052 100% 0    
8/4/1942 1013 Netherlands 429 268 697 69% 316 gassed none
8/5/1942 1034 France 22 542 564 55% 470 gassed none
8/5/1942 998 Belgium 426 318 744 75% 254 -  
8/7/1942 1014 France 214 96 310 31% 704 gassed none
8/7/1942 987 Netherlands 315 149 464 47% 523 gassed none
8/9/1942 1069 France 63 211 274 26% 795 gassed none
8/11/1942 559 Netherlands 164 131 295 53% 264 gassed none
8/12/1942 1006 France 140 100 240 24% 766 gassed none
8/13/1942 999 Belgium 290 228 518 52% 481 gassed none
8/14/1942 1007 France 233 62 295 29% 712 gassed none
8/15/1942 505 Netherlands 98 79 177 35% 328 gassed none
8/16/1942 991 France 115 0 115 12% 876 gassed none
8/17/1942 1000 Belgium 157 205 362 36% 638 gassed none
8/18/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 87 69 156 - 0 -  
8/18/1942 506 Netherlands 319 40 359 71% 147 gassed none
8/19/1942 997 France 65 35 100 10% 897 gassed none
8/20/1942 998 Belgium 104 71 175 18% 823 gassed none
8/21/1942 1000 France 138 45 183 18% 817 gassed none
8/22/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 110 86 196 - 0 -  
8/22/1942 1008 Netherlands 411 217 628 62% 380 gassed none
8/23/1942 1000 France 90 18 108 11% 892 gassed none
8/25/1942 519 Netherlands 231 38 269 52% 250 gassed none
8/26/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 71 88 159 - 0 -  
8/26/1942 1000 France 92   92 9% 908 gassed none
8/27/1942 ??? ? (Luxemburg) 82   82 - 0 -  
8/27/1942 995 Belgium 101 114 215 22% 780 gassed none
8/28/1942 1000 France 227 36 263 26% 737 gassed none
8/30/1942 608 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 608 -  
8/30/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 45 31 76 - unknown gassed? none
8/31/1942 1000 France 253 71 324 32% 676 gassed none
8/31/1942 1000 Belgium 200   200 20% 800 gassed none
9/1/1942 608 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 608 -  
9/2/1942 1000 France 212 27 239 24% 761 gassed none
9/3/1942 1000 Belgium 210 86 296 30% 704 gassed none
9/4/1942 1000 France 210 113 323 32% 677 gassed none
9/5/1942 714 Netherlands 53 0 53 7% 661 gassed none
9/6/1942 1013 France 216 38 254 25% 759 gassed none
9/8/1942 930 Netherlands 206 26 232 25% 698 gassed none
9/9/1942 1000 France 259 52 311 31% 689 gassed none
9/10/1942 1000 Belgium 221 64 285 29% 715 gassed none
9/11/1942 1000 France 223 68 291 29% 709 gassed none
9/12/1942 874 Netherlands 226 34 260 30% 614 gassed none
9/12/1942 1000 France 302 78 380 38% 620 gassed none
9/14/1942 1000 Belgium 295 105 400 40% 600 gassed none
9/16/1942 902 Netherlands 247 29 276 31% 626 gassed none
9/16/1942 1000 France 306 49 355 36% 645 gassed none
9/17/1942 1048 Belgium 230 101 331 32% 717 gassed none
9/18/1942 1003 France 300 147 447 45% 556 gassed none
9/19/1942 ??? Slovakia 206 71 277 - “rest” gassed none
9/20/1942 1002 Netherlands 301 111 412 41% 590 gassed none
9/20/1942 1000 France 231 110 341 34% 659 gassed none
9/22/1942 713 Netherlands 133 50 183 26% 530 gassed none
9/23/1942 ??? Slovakia 294 67 361 - “rest” gassed none
9/24/1942 1000 France 215 144 359 36% 641 gassed none
9/25/1942 1000 France 399 126 525 53% 475 gassed none
9/26/1942 928 Netherlands 129 50 179 19% 749 gassed none
9/27/1942 1004 France 215 91 306 30% 698 gassed none
9/28/1942 1742 Belgium 286 58 344 20% 1398 gassed none
9/29/1942 904 France 223 48 271 30% 633 gassed none
9/30/1942 610 Netherlands 37 119 156 26% 454 gassed none
10/2/1942 210 France 34 22 56 27% 154 gassed none
10/3/1942 1014 Netherlands 329 33 362 36% 652 gassed none
10/7/1942 2012 Netherlands 540 58 598 30% 1414 gassed none
10/11/1942 1703 Netherlands 344 108 452 27% 1251 gassed none
10/12/1942 1674 Belgium 28 88 116 7% 1558 gassed none
10/14/1942 1711 Netherlands 351 69 420 25% 1291 gassed none
10/18/1942 1710 Netherlands 0 116 116 7% 1594 gassed none
10/21/1942 ??? Slovakia 121 78 199 - “rest” gassed none
10/21/1942 1327 Netherlands 497 0 497 37% 830 gassed none
10/25/1942 988 Netherlands 21 32 53 5% 935 gassed none
10/26/1942 1471 Belgium 460 116 576 39% 895 gassed none
10/27/1942 841 Netherlands 224 205 429 51% 412 gassed none
10/28/1942 1866 Theresienstadt 215 32 247 13% 1619 gassed none
11/1/1942 659 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 659 gassed none
11/1/1942 1014 Germany 0 37 37 4% 977 gassed none
11/3/1942 1696 Belgium 702 75 777 46% 919 gassed none
11/4/1942 954 Netherlands 0 50 50 5% 904 gassed none
11/6/1942 1000 France 269 92 361 36% 639 gassed none
11/7/1942 ??? (2000) Zichenau 465 229 694 35% 1306 gassed none
11/7/1942 465 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 465 gassed none
11/8/1942 ??? (1000) Zichenau 0 0 0 0% 1000 gassed none
11/8/1942 1000 France 145 82 227 23% 773 gassed none
11/9/1942 ??? (1000) Białystok 190 104 294 29% 706 gassed none
11/11/1942 1000 France 150 100 250 25% 750 gassed none
11/12/1942 758 Netherlands 3 48 51 7% 707 gassed none
11/13/1942 745 France 112 34 146 20% 599 gassed none
11/14/1942 ??? (2500) Zichenau 633 135 768 31% 1732 gassed none
11/14/1942 ??? (1500) Białystok 282 379 661 44% 839 gassed none
11/18/1942 ??? (209) ? (Norway) 8 22 30 - ­- gassed none
11/18/1942 ??? (1000) Białystok 165 65 230 23% 770 gassed none
11/19/1942 ??? (1500) Zichenau 532 361 893 60% 607 gassed none
11/21/1942 726 Netherlands 47 35 82 11% 644 gassed none
11/22/1942 ??? (1500) Zichenau 300 132 432 29% 1068 gassed none
11/25/1942 ??? (2000) Grodno Ghetto 305 128 433 22% 1567 gassed none
11/26/1942 709 Netherlands 0 42 42 6% 667 gassed none
11/28/1942 ??? (1000) Zichenau 325 169 494 49% 506 gassed none
11/30/1942 ??? (1000) Zichenau 130 37 167 17% 833 gassed none
12/1/1942 532 Norway 186 0 186 35% 346 gassed none
12/2/1942 826 Netherlands 77 0 77 9% 749 gassed none
12/2/1942 ??? (1000) Grodno Ghetto 178 60 238 24% 762 gassed none
12/3/1942 ??? (1000) Płonsk Ghetto 347 0 347 35% 653 gassed none
12/6/1942 811 Netherlands 16 0 16 2% 795 gassed none
12/6/1942 ??? (2500) Mława Ghetto 406 0 406 16% 2094 gassed none
12/8/1942 ??? (1000) Grodno Ghetto 231 60 291 27% 769 gassed none
12/10/1942 927 Netherlands 39 3 42 5% 885 gassed none
12/10/1942 1060 Germany 137 25 162 15% 898 gassed none
12/10/1942 ??? (2500) Małkinia 524 0 524 21% 1976 gassed none
12/12/1942 ??? (2000) Małkinia 416 6 422 21% 1578 gassed none
12/14/1942 757 Netherlands 121 0 121 16% 636 gassed none
12/14/1942 ??? (1500) N.D. Mazow. 580 0 580 39% 920 gassed none
12/17/1942 ??? (2000) Płonsk Ghetto 523 257 780 39% 1220 gassed none
Totals: 143,209       60,815 43% 82,394    

* Acc. to Czech, this transport actually contained political detainees from France, some of whom may have been Jews.


Danuta Czech also lists a number of deportations for which no entries exist in

the clandestinely compiled registration lists. They all come from either of two sources:


1. A book by the Polish author Natan E. Szternfinkiel (Zagłada Żydow

Sosnowca, Centralna Żydowska Komisja Historyczna, Katowice 1946).


2. Martin Gilbert’s atlas on the Holocaust (Endlösung: Die Vertreibung

und Vernichtung der Juden. Ein Atlas, Rowohlt, Reinbek 1982).


The first book is marked by anti-German propaganda and is devoid of any reference to

any sources regarding its claims on deportation of Jews from Ilkenau and Sosnowiec

(German Sosnowitz) to Auschwitz. The second is marked by the total absence of any source

references. In other words: both books back up their claims with – nothing. Here are these

claimed deportations backed up by nothing:


Date arrivals from reg. male reg. female reg. total reg. % unreg. unreg. fate proof
5/5/1942 5200 ??? 0 0 0 0% 5,200 gassed Gilbert
5/12/1942 1500 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 1,500 gassed Szternfinkiel
6/2/1942 ??? Ilkenau 0 0 0 0% ??? gassed Szternfinkiel
6/17/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
6/20/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
1/8/1942 5000 Bendsburg 0 0 0 0% 5,000 gassed Gilbert
8/15/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 27 75 102 5% 1,898 gassed Szternfinkiel
8/16/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
8/17/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
8/18/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
Subtotals: 23,700       102   23,598    
Totals: 166,909       60,917 36% 105,992





All deportees of these transports are said to have been killed in gas chambers, with only

one exception: the entry of August 15, for which Czech gives a number of registered inmates

which she must have derived from the registration lists. However, there is nothing in these

documents confirming that the transport with which these 102 admitted deportees arrived

consisted of 2,000 inmates, let alone that 1898 of them were killed. In fact, Szternfinkiel insists in all ca

ses that the deportees were killed all and sundry, hence Czech’s correction here is a manipulation of the source.

Data Analysis


Idle Bunker 1


The mass murder of the Jews at Auschwitz using gas chambers is said to have started

sometime in early 1942. For this purpose, the interior of an old farmhouse in the vicinity

of the Birkenau Camp is said to have been converted into a set of homicidal gas chambers.

Czech claims that this building was put into operation on March 20. The sources she quotes

for this event (statements by R. Höss and P. Broad), however, do not confirm her date.

In fact, the sources are not specific regarding the exact date and contradict each other to some degree.


A more important question is: who was killed in these gas chambers? If we look at the

first table containing deportation transports for whose existence there is at least some

documentary evidence, we realize that, until early July 1942, every single person deported

to Auschwitz with those transport was properly registered and admitted to the camp.

Czech even says so explicitly in a footnote to her entry of March 26, 1942 about the first

transport arriving at Auschwitz (from Slovakia), explaining that only individuals fit for

labor were sent. This proves that at least until early July 1942, deportees were sent to

Auschwitz with the exclusive aim to deploy them as slave laborers. There was no policy

of extermination in place.


The only way of supporting the claim that Jews were killed en masse at Auschwitz during

the first half of 1942 is the use of dubious sources full of wild claims without any support in

the extant documentation: Gilbert’s and Szternfinkiel’s wholly invented mass gassings as

listed in the second table, plus a few gassing events among registered inmates whose

reality is confirmed only by self-proclaimed “eyewitnesses” who testified during the Polish

show trials against Rudolf Höss and members of the Auschwitz camp garrison.[8] Since

each death of a registered inmate was recorded numerous times and in a number of ways

by the various Auschwitz authorities, and because these documents do not reflect these

mass murders, as Mattogno has aptly shown, it is quite safe to say that these

events are based merely on witness fantasies and are simply untrue.


In other words, no gassing happened at Auschwitz before early July 1942. Hence, the

so-called Bunker 1 would not have served any purpose. This jibes well with the results

of Carlo Mattogno’s detailed research into the question of whether or not this “Bunker 1”

existed in the first place: it did not. It, too, is a mere figment of the imagination.[9]


In early July, things are said to have changed drastically, though. Czech writes that on

June 30, the second gas-chamber building – Bunker 2 – became operational. She supports

her claim by again quoting Rudolf Höss’s post-war statements, which are of little value,

however, due to the circumstances of coercion under which they were made and due

to their internal inconsistencies and blatant contradictions to external, more-reliable sources.

[10] Since Czech’s claims about Bunker 1 are obviously bogus, how can we take such lore

seriously anymore? The fact of the matter is that, after July 1942, not all deportees sent

toward Auschwitz were being taken into the camp anymore. So what happened in

July 1942 that changed things?


There were actually at least two factors that changed the way the deportees were being processed.




In her entry for April 6, 1941, Danuta Czech mentions that typhus was introduced to the

Auschwitz Camp by inmates transferred from Lublin. However, she does not support her

claim with any contemporaneous documents. Her next entry mentioning the dreaded disease

is more than a year later, on May 10, 1942, where she remarks that the Auschwitz garrison

physician Dr. Siegfried Schwela died of the disease. Hence, not only the inmates, but

also the SS personnel were affected by the epidemic. Dr. Schwela’s successor, Dr. Kurt Uhlenbrok,

got infected as well and, being unable to perform his duties, was relieved of the post only

a month later, on June 9 (although Czech reports about this only in her entry for August 17).

Thus, the pivotal post of garrison physician, responsible for the camp’s hygiene, was pretty

much unoccupied until after the peak of the epidemic. The camp’s health and sanitary

situation started to improve only after Dr. Eduard Wirths, previously posted as garrison

physician of the Dachau Camp, showed up at Auschwitz on September 6 to take

over Uhlenbrok’s position.[11]



Figure 1: Monthly deaths at Auschwitz.



If we look at the trend of the camp’s mortality in 1942 as reflected in the Death Books,

see Figure 1, we clearly recognize the catastrophic rising tide peaking in August of 1942,

with daily deaths reaching a maximum of almost 500 on certain days.[12] The disease was

brought somewhat under control in late 1942, but flared up again in early 1943 and

then once more, although less pronouncedly, during the winter of 1943/1944.


Considering the crucial role the Auschwitz camp system was supposed to play as a provider

of slave labor for the region’s war-related industries, the Auschwitz camp authorities reacted

rather sluggishly to this disaster, to put it mildly. As Czech reports, Commandant Höss

imposed a partial camp lockdown (Lagersperre) only on July 10. A week later, Heinrich Himmler

arrived for a two-days’ visit to inspect the SS’s undertakings in the area. During that

visit, it would have been impossible to hide the disastrous situation from him.


Although Czech, in her entry for July 17, has Himmler attend a mass gassing of 499 deportees

from the Netherlands on that day, an inspection of Himmler’s diary shows that he never

went to Birkenau at all. Since that camp was the hotbed of typhus and other infectious diseases

– unsurprisingly, since at that time it was still under construction and lacked any proper sanitary

facilities – it would have been highly dangerous for him to go there. That he in fact did not

go there also results from the fact that Rudolf Höss’s claim of Himmler having attended the

entire procedure – from unloading the transport train until the clearing of the victims’ bodies

from the gas chambers[13] – cannot be true, because the train from the Netherlands

arrived at Auschwitz already in the evening of July 16, and the newly admitted inmates

showed up in the camp’s record already during the morning roll call of July 17. Himmler,

however, arrived at Kattowitz Airport only at 3:15 pm on July 17, but did not get to the camp

itself before late afternoon.[14] Considering that the primary source upon which the tale of

Himmler’s attendance of a gassing rests is none other than Rudolf Höss’s postwar fairy tales,

the entire episode can be dismissed safely as just another myth cooked up by Höss in an

attempt to directly implicate Himmler in what supposedly transpired at Auschwitz

under Höss’s command.


Interestingly, this mass gassing of deportees from an incoming transport is the only one

of 1942 for which Czech provides a source to back it up – and what a source it is:

the tortured Rudolf Höss facing the noose.


This transport of July 17 is also the very first one arriving at Auschwitz for which we

know with some certainty that not all deportees who boarded the train were registered

at Auschwitz, for we know how many were on that train (2000, 1551 of whom were registered).

Although Czech claims that an unspecified (hence unknown) number of deportees from two

earlier transports from Slovakia were gassed in “the bunker” (July 4 and 11), we have

no record of how many deportees were on these trains. I’ll get back to this later.


Crematorium I


When the typhus epidemic struck in the spring of 1942, the only cremation facility operational

at Auschwitz was the old crematorium with its three double-muffle furnaces. Each muffle

could cremate a normal corpse on average within roughly an hour, meaning that, for a

20-hour workday, this facility could cremate a theoretical maximum of (6×20=) some 120

corpses.[15] In July 1942, the death rate exceeded 4,000, or 130 corpses per day on

average. But already the load put on that facility in the months prior to July led to such

massive strain that some of the refractory lining of the flues had to be replaced in mid-May

1942; a few weeks later, it was noticed that the chimney was deteriorating to such a degree

that it was decided to tear it down entirely and rebuild it. That work was done between

July 12 and August 8, 1942. During these almost four weeks, the crematorium was by

necessity out of operation, meaning that, when the typhus epidemic approached its cataclysmic

peak, Auschwitz had no cremation capacity at all.[16] After Crematorium I went back into

operation in mid-August, the death rate was more than twice the number of theoretically

possible cremations. What happened to all these corpses that could not be burned? Although

the situation improved considerably in November and December, things got out of hand

again in January 1943, with no additional cremation capacity ready to help out until mid-March

of that year (when Crematorium II went operational briefly, was overloaded and was shut

down again a few weeks later for major repairs…). At any rate, witnesses (among them Höss)

state that these “excess corpses” were buried in mass graves but later exhumed and burned

on pyres, because the corpses were lying in the groundwater threatening to poison the

drinking-water supply of the entire region. Considering all the circumstances, this part of the

witnesses’ story is most likely true.


In the context of the present study, we need not concern ourselves with the particulars

of this situation. Fact is that, when Himmler visited Auschwitz on July 17 and 18, 1942, he

saw his plans to turn this camp into a main hub of Germany’s exploitation of slave labor for

the war effort seriously threatened. In fact, Himmler saw the camp at its worse, with the

typhus epidemic raging out of control, with no garrison physician in charge, with few, if

any sanitary installations, with no capacity to cremate the victims, with corpses

piling up everywhere by the hundreds.


In this situation, it is claimed that at that very time the mass murder of thousands of

deportees in gas chambers started, that in fact a new gassing facility (Bunker 2) went

into operation. In view of the fact that the camp authorities had lost control of the epidemic

and could not even handle the corpses resulting from the disease, how likely is it that they

could have even thought of making this already uncontrollable situation even worse by adding

thousands of additional corpses every month which they wouldn’t have been able to

process in any way either?


Himmler’s reaction to the situation in Auschwitz is not known but may be inferred from the

fact that his subordinate Richard Glücks demanded only five days later, on July 23, that

Höss put the entire Auschwitz Camp on a total camp lockdown.[17] Thus,

Auschwitz, at that time a death camp quite literally, had been quarantined.


Deportation of Individuals Unfit for Labor


While initially the German authorities deported only such individuals to Auschwitz they deemed

capable of working, this policy gradually changed in July 1942, first by expanding the age

range upward, then by increasingly including individuals unfit for labor (primarily children),

as Aynat has shown in his 1994 study. The mainstream narrative has it that these individuals

were primarily those who were not registered on their arrival at the Auschwitz camp

but were killed in gas chambers.




In her entry for August 28, 1942, Czech writes that some 200 deportees fit for work were

taken off the deportation train at Cosel in Upper Silesia (halfway between Gleiwitz and

Oppeln, some 50 km northwest of Auschwitz) in order to be deployed as slave laborers in

Upper Silesian industry. There is evidently no direct documentary support for this claim,

but considering that Auschwitz had been put under a camp lockdown, and that sending even

deportees fit for labor there seems rather unwise, it stands to reason that the German

authorities tried to send as many deportees as possible to other places not threatened by

typhus. We know of the Cosel case only indirectly because some of the deportees taken off

there were later admitted to the Auschwitz Camp after all. Czech handles this situation by

arbitrarily subtracting invented numbers of deportees from several trains coming from France,

Belgium and the Netherlands:


Arrival Date # of Deportees from detrained at Cosel
8/28/1942 1000 France 200
9/2/1942 1000 France 200
9/3/1942 1000 Belgium 200
9/4/1942 1000 France 200
9/6/1942 1013 France 200
9/8/1942 930 Netherlands 200
9/9/1942 1000 France 200
9/10/1942 1000 Belgium 200
9/11/1942 1000 France 200
9/12/1942 874 Netherlands 200
9/12/1942 1000 France 300
9/14/1942 1000 Belgium 250
9/16/1942 902 Netherlands 200
9/16/1942 1000 France 250
9/18/1942 1003 France 300
9/20/1942 1002 Netherlands 200
9/22/1942 1000 France 200
9/24/1942 1000 France 150
9/27/1942 1004 France 175
9/29/1942 904 France 100
10/3/1942 1014 Netherlands 300
10/7/1942 2012 Netherlands 500



Hence, in total Czech claims that, during 1942, some 4925 deportees were taken off the

trains travelling through Cosel. This is pure conjecture. For all we know, the number of

inmates taken off at Cosel could have been lower or higher, or could have

included even all of the inmates that were not registered at Auschwitz.


Although the same could have happened to any train coming from the western Europe,

Czech limits this procedure arbitrarily to only a select few of them, and without foundation

denies it for the rest.


It may well be that the trains approaching Auschwitz made other stops elsewhere as well

where deportees were also taken off in order to be employed in local enterprises – including

trains coming from other countries such as Slovakia, Poland, Belarus (Grodno) etc. And it

may well be that some deportees did not finish their journey when arriving at Auschwitz, but

that they left again – without having been registered – on other trains or by other means of

transportation to be sent either to labor-deployment sites around Auschwitz or farther to

the East, or to some ghetto, for instance.


That this is closer to the truth than what Czech conjectures can be demonstrated with the

transport of Dutch Jews arriving at Auschwitz on Oct. 18. Here is what

Carlo Mattogno has found out about that particular transport:[18]


“According to Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle, a Jewish transport from Holland arrived

on October 18, 1942, with 1,710 deportees, of whom only 116 women were registered,

and the remaining 1,594 persons are said to have been gassed. The ‘special

operation’ mentioned by [Johann] Kremer allegedly refers to this claimed gassing.


According to a Dutch Red Cross report, the transport in question, comprising 1,710

persons, departed from Westerbork on October 16 and stopped first in Kosel,

where 570 [sic!] persons were taken off. The rest continued on to the following camps:


‘St. Annaberg or Sakrau – Bobrek or Malapane – Blechhammer and further

some to Bismarckhütte/Monowitz. A separate group into the Groß-Rosen zone.’


A list of the transports from Westerbork to the east – probably prepared by Louis de Jong

– names as the destinations of the October 16, 1942, transport ‘Sakrau, Blechhammer, Kosel.’


For its false assertions regarding this transport, Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle again cites

the Kremer diary! Thus only a small percentage of the Jews deported

from Holland on October 16, 1942, actually arrived in Auschwitz.”


So it wasn’t just Cosel where the trains stopped and

deportees got off; they detrained at many stations.


While it is to some degree speculative to apply this pattern generously to all transports where

we don’t know the fates of deportees not arriving at Auschwitz or at least not having been

registered there, Czech’s procedure of picking a few transports and taking a few inmates off

at Cosel is at least as speculative, and even more so her utterly unsupported claim that the

difference between deportees boarding a train and those registered at Auschwitz

(plus those taken off at Cosel) equals the number of deportees gassed on arrival.


One thing is for certain, however: Considering that Auschwitz had turned into a deathtrap

due to the raging typhus epidemic, it would have made perfect sense for the German authorities

to send as many deportees elsewhere rather than to let them perish at Auschwitz.


Some Honesty


I mentioned earlier that Czech claims that an unspecified number of deportees from two

transports from Slovakia were gassed in “the bunker” (July 4 and 11). The only extant

document for this transport is the clandestinely compiled list of registration numbers

assigned to deportees on these transports (372 and 330, respectively). These lists tell us

neither how many deportees were on these trains altogether nor what happened to those

that were not registered, if any deportees were left unregistered in the first place. Czech

repeats this same arbitrary procedure of simply claiming, without any proof or trace,

that there was an unregistered rest subsequently gassed in each instance where the

clandestine lists mention registration numbers assigned to deportees from Slovakia:


Date arrivals from registered males registered females registered total unregistered unregistered fate proof
7/4/1942 ??? Slovakia 264 108 372 “rest” gassed none
7/11/1942 ??? Slovakia 182 148 330 “rest” gassed none
7/18/1942 ??? Slovakia 327 178 505 “rest” gassed none
7/25/1942 ??? Slovakia 192 93 285 “rest” gassed none
8/1/1942 ??? Slovakia 165 75 240 “rest” gassed none
9/19/1942 ??? Slovakia 206 71 277 “rest” gassed none
9/23/1942 ??? Slovakia 294 67 361 “rest” gassed none
10/21/1942 ??? Slovakia 121 78 199 “rest” gassed



It would have been much more honest to state right away that we don’t know how many

deportees were on these trains, hence that it is unknown how many deportees were gassed,

if any at all. This is the procedure she applies to transports coming from Yugoslavia, of which

we also have merely the range of registration numbers assigned. For the first three instances

she doesn’t even mention any unregistered deportees, let alone their presumed fates, while

her last entry for Yugoslavia states expressly that it is unknown how many perished in the gas chambers:


Date arrivals from registered males registered females registered total unregistered unregistered fate
8/18/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 87 69 156 ­- -
8/22/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 110 86 196 - -
8/26/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 71 88 159 - -
8/30/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 45 31 76 unknown



She always states, however, that the registered inmates were admitted into the amp

“after a selection,” implying that some inmates might have been selected not to get registered.

These entries are probably the only ones in her entire book which come close to being honest,

together with a few exotic ones about which she evidently didn’t dare make gassing

speculation for lack of any documentary evidence or even anecdotal hints by self-proclaimed

witnesses (Aug. 27: 82 registered deportees from Luxemburg; Nov. 18: 30 registered deportees

of unknown origin).[19]


There are many other cases of registration numbers assigned to inmates coming from

eastern Europe where Czech is less prudent and simply speculates wildly as to the numbers

of deportees contained in the respective deportation trains. I highlighted them in my first table

by rendering the number of alleged unregistered deportees – Czech’s gassing victims – in bold.

Here they are once more:


Arrival date Claimed deportees from registered registered % unregistered
11/7/1942 2000 Zichenau 694 35% 1306
11/8/1942 1000 Zichenau 0 0% 1000
11/9/1942 1000 Białystok 294 29% 706
11/14/1942 2500 Zichenau 768 31% 1732
11/14/1942 1500 Białystok 661 44% 839
11/18/1942 1000 Białystok 230 23% 770
11/19/1942 1500 Zichenau 893 60% 607
11/22/1942 1500 Zichenau 432 29% 1068
11/25/1942 2000 Grodno Ghetto 433 22% 1567
11/28/1942 1000 Zichenau 494 49% 506
11/30/1942 1000 Zichenau 167 17% 833
12/2/1942 1000 Grodno Ghetto 238 24% 762
12/3/1942 1000 Płonsk Ghetto 347 35% 653
12/6/1942 2500 Mława Ghetto 406 16% 2094
12/8/1942 1000 Grodno Ghetto 291 27% 769
12/10/1942 2500 Małkinia 524 21% 1976
12/12/1942 2000 Małkinia 422 21% 1578
12/14/1942 1500 Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki Ghetto 580 39% 920
12/17/1942 2000 Płonsk Ghetto 780 39% 1220
Total of claimed gassing victims:



Note that in lack of any extant document regarding these transports there is no evidence regarding the number of deportees contained in them. Hence, Czech’s numbers (here in the second column) are arbitrary at best, and, perforce, so are the numbers of alleged unregistered deportees, all of whom Czech lists as gassing victims with the exact number, in spite of the fact that she starts out with a made-up estimate. It’s all hocus-pocus.




There are two particularly interesting deportation cases in the above table: those arriving at

Auschwitz on December 10 and 12. They came from Małkinia, which was a transit camp

near the infamous Treblinka camp. Here is the question: if the vast majority of Jews coming

from Małkinia (Czech claims that 79% of them were gassed at Auschwitz) were really slated

to perish in gas chambers, why did the German authorities in charge of shipping Jews

around Europe not select them right in Małkinia and send those unfit for labor – or unworthy

of living, whatever the case may be – around the corner to the claimed highly efficient

gassing facilities at the Treblinka extermination camp? Maybe because there was no such

thing as a Treblinka extermination camp?[20] Or maybe because no Jew

deported from Małkinia to Auschwitz was killed at Auschwitz? You decide.




The number of Jews killed in the gas chambers of Auschwitz right after arriving at the

camp, hence without any registration, amounted to 105,992 for the entire year of 1942, if

we are to take Danuta Czech’s words as printed in her Auschwitz Chronicle at face value.

However, she has literally nothing in terms of documentation to back up her claims.

Where there is a difference proven by documents between the number of deportees who

boarded a train and the number of those who were registered at Auschwitz, she always

claims that all of them were killed in the gas chambers (except for those who she speculates

left the train in Cosel), although there are plenty of other explanations possible for this

numerical difference, be it that more deportees than she assumes detrained at Cosel, that

there were other stations along the journey where deportees were taken off, or that for some

of the deportees arriving at Auschwitz their journey simply hadn’t come to an end yet, meaning

that they were deported farther east, either to other locations

of labor deployment or to places of ghettoization.


Any serious scholar wishing to write history based only on verifiable data must conclude that, for the year 1942, there is not a shred of evidence for even one single deportee arriving at Auschwitz and being led straight to the gas chambers without prior registration and admission to the camp. This analysis confirms Mattogno’s conclusion that there never were any homicidal gassing “bunkers” at Auschwitz.9 There simply was no need for them, as there is no evidence for any such gassings.



[1] Danuta Czech, Auschwitz Chronicle 1938-1945, Tauris, London 1990; German original: Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945, Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek 1989; I have posted OCR-processed scans of Czech’s 172 pages devoted tot he year 1942 here: https://codoh.com/media/files/downloads/CzechChronicle1942-OCR.pdf.
[2] Czech mentions only one deportation train that contained political prisoners rather than Jews: on July 8, 1942, 1170 deportees from France arrived at Auschwitz which consisted of Jews and Gentiles alike. All of them were admitted to the camp and assigned registration numbers.
[3] Enrique Aynat, Estudios sobre el “Holocausto,” La deportación de judíos de Francia y Bélgica en 1942, Graficas Hurtado, Valencia 1994, pp. 3-88; https://codoh.com/library/document/6349/.
[4] Aynat devoted the second part of the above-mentioned book to a detailed translation and discussion of these reports, ibid., pp. 89-181. It will appear shortly in English translation in a modified form as part of Jürgen Graf’s Auschwitz: Confessions and Testimonies. A Critical Analysis, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2019 (in preparation; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=36).
[5] Enrique Aynat, “Die Sterbebücher von Auschwitz: Statistische Daten über die Sterblichkeit der 1942 aus Frankreich nach Auschwitz deportierten Juden,” Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1998), pp. 188-198; http://vho.org/VffG/1998/3/Aynat3.html. The Spanish original appeared as a chapter in: Enrique Aynat, Jean-Marie Boisdefeu, Estudios sobre Auschwitz, self-published, Valencia 1997.
[6] Carlo Mattogno, Healthcare in Auschwitz: Medical Care and Special Treatment of Registered Inmates, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 87-216; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=33.
[7] Czech refers to these lists once only in her entry for June 14, 1940 (for males), indicating that henceforth all those deportation data without any further source given originate from these lists (for females here reference can be found in her entry for March 26, 1942).
[8] Czech mentions this on three dates: on May 4 with an unspecified number of victims during an unspecified number of events based on the claim that the overfilled Auschwitz sick bay is said to have been reduced repeatedly this way; June 11, with 320 victims; and June 23, with 566 victims.
[9] Carlo Mattogno, Debunking the Bunkers of Auschwitz: Black Propaganda versus History, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=11.
[10] For details see Rudolf Höss, Carlo Mattogno, Commandant of Auschwitz: Rudolf Höss, His Torture and His Forced Confessions, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2017; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=35.
[11] On Wirths’s Herculean struggle to get the epidemic under control see Carlo Mattogno’s book Healthcare in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 5), especially Part 3 by Christoph Wieland, pp. 219-269.
[12] Compiled using data contained in Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau (ed.), Die Sterbebücher von Auschwitz, Saur, Munich 1995.
[13] Czech quotes Martin Broszat (ed.), Kommandant in Auschwitz, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich 1963, pp. 161, 181-183.
[14] For a detailed analysis see Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 16-25; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=10.
[15] On these furnaces see Carlo Mattogno, Franco Deana, The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz: A Technical and Historical Study, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2015, particularly Vol. 1, pp. 337f.; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=24; as well as Carlo Mattogno, Franco Deana, “The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in: Germar Rudolf (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory,” 2nd ed., Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago, Ill., 2003, pp. 373-412, esp. pp. 402; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1.
[16] Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: Crematorium I and the Alleged Homicidal Gassings, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 46-48; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=21.
[17] See Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 13), p. 45.
[18] C. Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 18), p. 94.
[19] In one case, Czech probably simply forgot her cookie-cutter claim that all unregistered deportees were killed in gas chambers: Aug. 5: 998 deportees from Belgium, 744 of which were registered; the difference (254) is not mentioned by her.
[20] See Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=8.
Author(s): Germar Rudolf
Title: How Danuta Czech Invented 100,000 Gassing Victims
Sources: Inconvenient History, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2019)

published: 2019-02-18, first posted: 2019-02-18 12:01:39






Click on this text to examine THE HOLOCAUST LIES.


Eyewitnesses to the Treblinka “Gas Chambers”


      Traditional Holocaust historians state that Treblinka was a pure extermination camp in

which approximately 870,000 Jews were murdered. The number of Jewish survivors of

Treblinka is generally thought to have been between 40 and 70, and probably closer to

the lower figure.This article will examine the credibility of several Jewish survivors

of Treblinka.




      Chil Rajchman was a Jewish survivor of Treblinka who was interviewed by the US Office

of Special Investigations in 1980. He later traveled to the United States to appear as a witness

for the prosecution in the extradition trial of John Demjanjuk. Rajchman also took the witness

stand in Jerusalem where Demjanjuk was put on trial for allegedly being a murderous guard

at Treblinka.[2] The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that Demjanjuk’s guilt had not been proven,

and that the eyewitness testimony of Rajchman and four other witnesses failed to identify

Demjanjuk credibly.[3]


Rajchman described the gas chambers at Treblinka in his memoirs:


     The Schlauch road is not long. In a few minutes you find yourself in a white structure,

on which a Star of David is painted. On the steps of the structure stands a German, who

points to the entrance and smiles—Bitte, bitte! The steps lead to a corridor

lined with flowers and with long towels hanging on the walls.


       The size of the gas chamber is seven by seven meters. In the middle of the chamber

there are shower-heads through which the gas is introduced. On one of the walls a thick

pipe serves as an exhaust to remove the air. Thick felt around the doors of the

chamber renders them airtight.


      In this building there are some 10 gas chambers. At a short distance from the main

structure there is a smaller one with three gas chambers. By the doors stand several

Germans who shove people inside. Their hands do not rest for a moment as they

scream fiendishly—Faster, faster, keep moving![4]


      Rajchman wrote that exhaust gas from a Diesel engine was piped into the gas chambers.

[5] However, Austrian engineer Walter Lüftl and American engineer Friedrich Paul Berg h

ave both documented that exhaust from Diesel engines could not have been used for mass

executions at Treblinka. Lüftl concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with

Diesel engines and gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation.[6]


         Berg writes: “However, the story [of mass gassings] becomes even more incredible

when one discovers that far better sources of carbon monoxide, better even than gasoline

engines, were readily available to the Germans. Those other

sources did not require either Diesel fuel or gasoline.”[7]


      Rajchman in his memoirs also reported the following horrific incident:


       It once happened that an oven was brought next to a huge grave, where perhaps

a quarter of a million people were buried. As usual the oven was loaded with the proper

number of bodies and in the evening it was lit. But a strong wind carried the fire over

to the huge grave and engulfed it in flames. The blood of some quarter of a million

people began to flare, and thus burned for a night and a day. The whole camp administration

came to look upon this marvel, gazing with satisfaction at the blaze.

The blood came up to the surface and burned as if it were fuel.[8]


       Since blood consists mostly of water and is nonflammable,

Rajchman’s story that blood burned as if it were fuel is totally absurd.[9] 


        Rajchman also reported other instances when the blood from gassed victims rose to

the surface: “I remember that every morning when we went out to work, we would notice

that the surfaces of the pits had burst in dozens of places. By day the ground was firmly

trodden down, but at night the blood pressed up to the surface…The blood of tens

of thousands of victims, unable to rest, thrust itself up to the surface.”[10]


         Rajchman’s story that blood “pressed up to the surface” at night but was trodden

down during the day is ludicrous. Rajchman’s memoirs about his stay in

Treblinka are no more credible than his testimony at the John Demjanjuk trial.   




      Richard Glazar was a Jew sent to Treblinka at the beginning of October 1942.

He said he spent 10 months in Treblinka before escaping from the camp.[11] Glazar in

his memoirs also stated that exhaust gasses from motors were used in the gas chambers at Treblinka:


      The gas chambers are the only brick buildings in the entire camp. Actually,

they com