Click on this text to watch a Holocaust Quiz
No one can deny that Jews
were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA
TRANSFER AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were rounded up and imprisoned
in America for the same reasons, those reasons being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion
during WWII. And, after examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more humanely
accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.
War II West Coast Camps for Japanese-Americans here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p-45_Weber.html )
What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the
use, of homicidal gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of human
derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories" where 6,000,000 Jews were
gassed and cremated and other outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.
In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews. After World War
II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations.
Indeed tens of thousands of imprisoned Jews died during the
last months of WWII due to disease, especially typhus, and starvation (The International Committee
of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about
half of them Jews). After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the
losing side, food and medicine become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for those imprisoned by
the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine manufacturing, and transportation
supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a
totally merciless war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).
Indeed there were crematoriums working overtime
as a means of sanitarily disposing of disease ridden corpses, but these were built during the last year
of the war and never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.
As a matter of fairness, try to imagine what would
have become of all the Japanese incarcerated in American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of
war turned against an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they would have been
massacred by furious Americans before they had starved to death.
Once you fully realize that there were no "gas chambers"
or such things as human skin lampshades, most of the Jewish narrative regarding the so called "holocaust"
becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated by the lowest sort of scammers.
Only lies need laws for protection. There are many individuals who have been imprisoned in occupied Germany
for merely telling the truth about the holocaust scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting
hatred for the Jews" whereas it's actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with
their holocaust LIES.
Free yourself from the power of
a lie designed to render you impotent. By instilling unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity
via the "holocaust", humanity is rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant,
to criticize, much less interfere with, any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel.
The "holocaust" is also an ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust survivors"
through the collection of hundreds of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII
reparations that continues to this day.
Jews have made
questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense, with fines and imprisonment, and doing this
has only hurt their credibility and soured many against their official narrative. The truth does not need laws
to enforce it, only lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever have done — and want to do in America
— is criminalize not believing their improbable narrative. It is their “education” that
has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.
Despite billions of dollars and almost 70 years of non-stop propaganda
to promote the
so-called Holocaust in WWII, a new survey shows that these efforts are failing
to persuade young people of its credibility
children – in a ‘death camp’?… Do these JEWS look like they've been starved?…
That's not how they would have looked
in a Jew-run Soviet
concentration camp, apart
from having been raped and sodomized, as well.
Likewise, in the Jew-occupied Palestine,
fellow Jews could have
had them killed and
for their marketable body parts.
Whether in their guise as Judo-communists
or in their latter-day incarnation as
the last people
on earth the Jews would want
to be imprisoned by is anyone like themselves.
Mr Hitler's 1941 anti-Bolshevik Crusade
the internment of Jews
unavoidable – clearly
necessitated by the massive recruitment of
the Jews by the NKVD (KGB).
FBI and the German
Gestapo had numerous
examples of having arrested some
Soviet spies – only to find that they've got
Jews in custody.
contrast, no such hostile
recruitment was ever evidenced in regard of
the Japanese-Americans, who were interned
on purely racial grounds. (And
how many of
them would have
survived in the American
‘death camps’ – had the U.S. lost the war?)
As far as
the Third Reich was concerned,
from 1941 on, the Jewish problem suddenly
became a matter of security, rather than
a racial or political matter.
despite Mr Hitler's 1941 Commissar Order
providing for summary executions of all
terrorist suspects in a war zone, no measures
of any kind were taken against the Mountain
Jews of North Caucasus, as their Muslim
neighbours vouched that they weren't
involved with communism.
And the Germans
appreciated the friendly disposition on the
part of the Muslims, who, of course, were
glad to see the back of the Soviets
– and paid
price when the scumbags returned.
Hungarian Jewish women with their babies at Dachau, May 1945
Of course, none of those babies could have been carried to term
in a Soviet concentration camp. All
of them would have been self-
aborted by the starved and overworked (and pack-raped) mothers.
GULAG boss Moishe Berman with his accomplices.
Semi-anonymous KGB cutthroats exterminated sixty six
million – and not one of those vile Judo-communist mass
murderers was ever prosecuted in ‘democratized’
Yet the Jew/KGB-suborned Russian
media gloated every
time some dying ex-SS-man was being dragged through
the courts by the bloodthirsty Jews
in ‘democratic’ West.
the Soviet times, KGB – this partly Jewish gang
mass murderers and bumbling
poisoners – was a mere government agency.
became the government itself.
Offer the FREE HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE to those who may need it: http://user1252122.sites.myregisteredsite.com/id172.html
TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!
TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!
FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS
FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS CRIME MOB ATROCITIES:
RED CROSS RECORDS SHOW
271,301 TOTAL PERSONS DIED IN ALL GERMAN PRISON CAMPS DURING ALL OF WW II.
FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS
FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS CRIME MOB ATROCITIES!
1919 CE-1921 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Americans had
a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans, following WWI the Americans set up a quarantine, disinfection and work camp at Oświęcim
(Auschwitz) in 1919 CE to combat typhus. The American Polish Typhus Relief Expedition 1919-1921 established the camp(s)
because it was less than 50 miles to Krakow, Poland and had excellent railroad connections. Local gardens producing food
at reasonable prices. From there also, the peasants refugees could be spread out over the farms in western Galicia to help
with the harvest, thereby easing the burden that they were to the country.” The American-Poland Camp “housed
some 700 children and about 2,500 prisoners.” A Red Cross hospital was established there for refugees, some 5,000
to 6,000 persons per day and about 75% were transient military personnel. The American army used Zyklon, once the typhus
epidemics started to arrive around 1942 CE. A 1921 CE report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant”
described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated on Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was gassed
with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their hair cut off and were put through showers;
then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps.
ISRAEL 100 YEARS OF AMERICANS DYING FOR ZIONIST
GOALS = ROBBERY OF PALESTINE OVER 70 YEARS OF MASS MURDER AND OVERWHELMING FORCE
– DESCRIBES HOW ZIONIST FORCED USA INTO WW 1!
1919 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX —
THE BALFOUR DECLARATION, WORLD WAR ONE AND 6 MILLION JEWS — During WW I the British Government had agreed with leading
Rothschilds Crime Mob Ashkenazis that they would support a Ashkenazi homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Ashkenazi
lobby in America (ROTHSCHILDS AIPAC) getting the USA into WW II. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British
Government promising the Ashkenazis a homeland in Palestine. After WW I the British Government were unable, or unwilling,
to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Ashkenazis claimed 6 million Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination
unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged
1925 CE-1941 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX
— HUMAN SOAP LIES & PROPAGANDA — “the classic lie of war propaganda” Radha Binod Pal (1886 –
1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the Japanese version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials.
He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference
to the World War I British propaganda lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed
into them making soap. In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament, the story was untrue, in 1941 CE, “there
wasn’t a word of truth in it”, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II. Same Ashkenazi lies about lampshades.
1933 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Jewish World Almanacs on Jewish Population
show 1933 population of 15,315,000 Jews and show in 1948 15,753,000 Jews.
1933 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Haavara Agreement – THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT between HITLER and Zionists
Negotiated to send Ashkenazis to Palestine.
CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — GOEBBELS HAD A SPECIAL GERMAN COIN MINTED TO CELEBRATE ZIONISM & it had a Star of David on
one side and a Swastika on the other side. Mildenstein, SS Office for Jewish Affairs, travelled to Palestine for 6
months accompanied by Zionist officials & spent time at Kibbutz Farms. ZIONISTS THANKED GOEBBELS FOR THE
‘RACE LAWS’ OF 1935 CE.
1935 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Germany introduced strict race separation laws and the Head of Germany’s Zionist Movement Mr Georg Kareski gave an
interview said he had been trying for years to find a method to keep the two races (Germans & Jews) separate, and he
said the race laws supported the Jewish desires as the Jews had been struggling against assimilation for nearly 2000 years.
1936 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — A growing enormous opposition to the Haavara
Transfer Agreement came from powerful Jewish circles in the USA. Many of European Jews were extremely rich and powerful
and they had started to use their influence to sabotage the Haavara Agreement. They set up armed resistance and agitator
groups to fight against Hitlers idea. They also spread fabricated ‘atrocity’ propaganda about how badly Jews
were being treated in Germany. This propaganda was designed to swing world opinion against Hitlers Haavara Pact.
1938 CE-1949 CE: Mengele (1911 CE-1979 CE) spent three
years with a Waffen SS unit, mostly in the East and in Russia, where, according to SS records, he was wounded and declared
medically unfit for combat. He was a German officer and physician in Auschwitz camp supposedly to perform
human experiments on prisoners. Mengele had doctorates in anthropology and medicine and was a researcher interested
in genetics. After
the war Mengele sailed to Argentina in 1949 and ended up in Brazil in 1960. The Ashkenazis were after him all that time,
and supposedly he drowned after suffering a stroke while swimming off the Brazilian coast in 1979 CE. After the war he was
intercepted in his travel by British Intelligence who were interested in Mengele’s supposed work on creating bizarre
trauma for breaking young people and creating a blank slate brain-wiped individual who could be “layered” with
“alters” (Programmed) that would robotically carry out spying or dangerous criminal activities. British thought they most needed the perfect trauma
for programming transnational robotic tools of war. But Mengele may have been a front or victim of his own work and became
a brainwashed and did as he was told – whatever he was told like smile, chuckle, and he might have become a display
or front for the British. The British Ashkenazis were so paranoid that in 1985, amidst much hoopla, they put on a HOLY-HOAX
show trial conducted to quell the MEDIA DEVELOPED uprisings of hate against Mengele and his fellow escapes. Of course, with NO DEFENSE, he was found “guilty”
in his absence, but it was just for the cameras. The Ashkenazi Brits and Yanks didn’t want any discussion of brainwashing,
and nobody was thought able to believe it was considered so bizarre. Mengele’s research ideas and efforts likely led
to the CIA-Monarch programming program which was designed for brainwashing to program our children’s futures. Mengele
is now fully linked to “Monarch Programming” on the internet thanks to MEDIA HYPE.
1939 CE-1944 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX
— British government decided in 1941 CE that there were not enough dramatic photographs of Nazi atrocities and the
BRITISH COVERT OPERATIONS (BSC) arranged for a studio in CANADA to create such photographs using actors, stage-sets, costumes,
and dummies for the manufacture of war scenes in which actors dressed up as Nazi soldiers were shown mass-murdering innocent
people. These photos were widely circulated in the United States. – Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations
in the United States, 1939 CE-1944 CE. WWII UK and US PSYOPS Exposed the details of how British and Americans set up a fake
German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities”
with which to get the American public to support the war against Germany. PURE FAKERY IN ENGLAND + CANADA + AMERICA too
fake photos to demonize the Germans! And they still teach it in High School & College history classes. The American army
used Zyklon for a typhus epidemic in 1942 CE. A 1921 report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant”
described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated on Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was gassed
with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their hair cut off and were put through showers;
then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps. THE SOVIET, BRITISH, AND AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY
FORGERY FACTORIES — Russian forgery experts spent most of their time in producing material designed to delude, confound
and mislead their perceived enemies, both domestic and foreign. Much of this began after the Second World War with extensive
rewriting, editing and deliberate forgeries of German military and political documents designed to embarrass the United States
and its client, as well as to elevate the image of their own regime. One of the most ambitious Soviet productions concerned
the writings of Dr. Josef Goebbels. Because handwritten documents on the original, special paper Goebbels used would have
been nearly impossible to successfully fake, the new Soviet line was that the documents had actually been typed and then
put onto glass negatives. These were hidden by the Germans in cases where the Soviets were able to “discover”
them after the war. Having altered the Goebbels’ diaries from “several stacked folders” of handwritten
material to a box of more easily forged photographs of typed manuscript, the Russians began to offer their rare, politically
incorrect material to sources in Germany for sale and publication. German experts universally rejected these productions
as completely fake.
1939 CE-1945 CE: HOLOCAUST SAD
FACTS — FAKED WAR BUILT ON LIES & PROPAGANDA ABOUT GAS CHAMBERS AND 6 MILLION GENOCIDE REFUTED BY 7,061 PAGES
OF WW II ALLIED LEADERS — Churchill’s Second WW II propaganda never mentions Nazi ‘gas chambers,’
a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade
in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s
three-volume Memoirs is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either
of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims
of the war.”1941 CE: Stalin’s “Torch-men-Order” #0428 confirmed by Russia – Declares that Russian
partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements within a swathe of about
40 – 60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population. With these tactics it
was important to leave a few survivors, which would report the supposed German terror attacks. This method of warfare was
also confirmed by German soldiers who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms.
4 minute video — MSM AGGRANDIZED
THIS COWARDLY DRUNKEN WARMONGER!
CHURCHILL USED TRICKS TO FORCE WW II – NOW SOROS IS!
TRICKED AND FAKED WW II by David Irving, Famous BRITISH Author
CHURCHILL = REFUSE TO EVEN HEAR
GERMANY’S PEACE OFFER
CHURCHILL = WANTED LONDON BOMBED BY THE GERMANS TO BEGIN WW
II – MOST LIKELY UNDER ORDERS FROM THE ROTHSCHILDS MAFIA!
1941 CE-1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Hitler had second thoughts about setting up a Jewish Nation State and sending thousands of Jews to that State to
create Jewish forces & money to use against Germany, but the Haavara Agreement continued right on into WW II to
at least 1942 CE. Hitler wanted young and healthy Jews to work for their food and lodgings in factories and eventually resettle
in Western Russia south of Minsk until after the war finished. Arabs were so concerned by the close co-operation between
the Nazis & Zionists that they became convinced that Hitler must be a Jew who was just trying to establish a Jewish
State throughout the Middle East. “Between January 1 1943 and March 3 1943 CE 113,015 Jews were evacuated from the
Reich including Bohemia and Moravia, the new Eastern Territories and the district of Bialystok to the East and 8,025 Jews
were moved to the Ghetto for the Aged in Theresienstadt.” – The Korherr Report.
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty
different industries. The true reason for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is as an industrial complex which surrounded
the camp – most of it within full view of the interior of the camp itself. German industry included arms factories,
foundries and mines. They used the prisoners for most of the labour. The largest work camp was Auschwitz III (Monowitz).
It started operations in May 1942 CE and was associated with the synthetic rubber and liquid fuel plant Buna-Werke owned
by IG Farben. Eleven thousand laborers worked at Monowitz. Seven thousand inmates worked at various chemical plants. Eight
thousand worked in mines. Approximately 40,000 prisoners worked in labor camps at Auschwitz. Some put the number of prisoners
who worked at Auschwitz at 83,000. It is clear these prisoners worked for the German war effort in the Auschwitz prison
complex. The Monowitz industrial complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy
industries, ranging from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing. Auschwitz was the site of Germany’s
newest and most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this particular
field of technology. Shortly after the First World War the Germans were cut off from their supply of natural rubber. Auschwitz
was picked because it was a railway centre. Auschwitz had a hospital next door to treat prisoners.
1942 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Far from being the “death camps”
as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They
were work camps, critical to the German war effort. The Jewish workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed
specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived in ghettos
such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established
by the Allies after World War II. Many thousands of secret German wartime documents dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated
after the war by the Allies. But not a single one refers to a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the familiar
Auschwitz extermination story cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence. Evidence shows those unable to work were,
a very high percentage of the Jewish inmates, and were treated in the hospital or clinic. German telex message dated 1943
CE from the chief of the Labor Allocation department, reported that of 25,000 Jews held in Auschwitz, only 3,581 or 14%
were able to work, and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates — some 21,500, or about 86% were unable to work. 1944
CE report on “security measures in Auschwitz” by Oswald Pohl, head of the camp system, to Heinrich Himmler reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled
and in Auschwitz II camp there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom “approximately 15,000 are unable to work.”
This camp II was established primarily as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and elderly. A Jewish
scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University, acknowledges in his 1988 CE book about the “final
solution” that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other “natural” causes than were
executed. Auschwitz had a Swimming Pool, Soccer Field, Post Office, Cinema, Hospital, Art Studio & Classes, Dental Office,
Six Camp Orchestras, and a Library with 45,000 books. The elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz was built by the inmates, who
would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. 1944 CE there are photos showing a fencing tournament for prisoners
at Auschwitz (note the sign in the background). Postcards written from Auschwitz still exist and the postman would collect
the mail twice-weekly. Auschwitz was visited monthly by International Red Cross inspection teams who were allowed to speak
to prisoner representatives alone, in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery, interruption of mail and
parcel delivery, health concerns, food and ration matters etc.
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz Nurses and Doctors provided Medical Care and Special Treatment to Inmates
in sickbays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities, and the garrison physician Dr. Wirths,
tried with all conceivable means to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive and healthy.
1943 CE-1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — The Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
was the CIA’s “black propaganda” branch during WW II. At its peak in late 1944, the OSS employed almost
13,000 men and women. OSS agent and propagandist says 6,000,000 Jews will be obliterated Wallace R. Deuel, a Chicago-born
political scientist who worked at the American University in Beirut and wrote anti-German books and advised Walt Disney on
anti-German propaganda cartoons and was OSS special assistant to OSS’s director William J. Donovan. 1954 CE-1968 CE
Deuel held numerous senior positions in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative at
the White House during the Kennedy administration (close to a future dead president). “The Nazis set out in the beginning
to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning.”
Says the propagandist Wallace R. Deuel.
HOLOCAUST FACTS — David Irving said, “As late as August 1943 the head of the (British) PWE [Psychological Warfare
Executive] minuted the Cabinet secretly that despite the stories they were putting out, there was not the slightest evidence
that such contraptions (tools of genocide) existed.” This attitude changed in 1944, when British Intelligence finally
came to believe its own atrocity propaganda, as it was recycled back to them through the chaos and fury of war.
1944 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — BRITISH MINISTRY OF INFORMATION SAID IN 1944
THAT HOLOCAUST ATROCITY PROPAGANDA MUST BE CREATED TO DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZI USSR MASSACRES OF 66+ MILLION RUSSIANS –
MOSTLY CHRISTIANS – February 29, 1944 CE letter to the BBC & higher members of the British clergy, from the British
Ministry of Information ordered the propaganda buildup against the Germans. Today, the BBC has begun to play a major role
in recycling these lies and propaganda back to their point of origin in Poland. These broadcasts in effect created a feedback
loop that repeated and gave authority to Polish rumors, which were then re-injected back into Poland. — The Gas Chambers
of Sherlock Holmes by Samuel Crowell
HOLOCAUST FACTS — British Intelligence decrypted German reports show that 39% of German prisoners were Jews, 65% Poles
and only 3% Russians.
1 minute video
— JEWISH FRENCH PROFESSOR’S VIEWS ON “HOLY-COST! (sic)”
ENDS DEBATE = ONE OF THE BIGGEST
BAMBOOZLES OF ALL TIME! = TRUTH FROM WHAT ASHKENAZIS CALL A SELF-HATING ASHKENAZI ABOUT THE LIES OF THE HOLY-COST
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACT WITH HOAX
— Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: “The
whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us [communist inmates] with the help of our Polish
comrades.” (Deutsche Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July 1945). Thus, it is not surprising
to learn that during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been
orchestrated by communist authorities. — THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY The Case For Open Debate An Introduction by Germar
Rudolf in 1991 CE.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
“Of course, no physical evidence whatsoever was shown to verify the alleged homicidal gas chambers, despite knowledge
of their existence being denied by every single defendant.” —Jason Myers, on the Nuremberg trials of 1946 CE.
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human
gas chamber was constructed in 1946 by Stalin of the Ashkenazi USSR that mass murdered 66+ million Russians, mostly Christians.
1946 CE-Today: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide
poisoning is on record for any German labor camp. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in
the German labor camps. None of the war generals after the war who wrote their memoirs made any allusion to human gas chambers
or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group. The Red Cross made normal, routine visits to Auschwitz during
the war, and its published reports made no allusion to any ongoing human gassing there. No authentic documents attesting
to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere.
HOLOCAUST HOAX — Report of Council on Foreign Relations – Funded by Rockefeller-Rothschilds Crime Syndicate —
Made up their mind that no “revisionism” was to be encouraged after World War II: “The Committee on Studies
of the Council on Foreign Relations is concerned that the debunking journalistic campaign following World War I should not
be repeated and believes that the American public deserves a clear and competent statement of our basic aims and activities
during the second World War.”
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Illegal Jewish immigrants were sprayed by British as a precaution against typhus carrying lice with large AMOUNTS OF ZYKLON-B
USED ALSO AT THE CAMPS.
1948 CE-1949 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee
of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War”. In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners
in the German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Ashkenazi run USSR (Russian) camps. The Official
International Red Cross Records of WWII at Arolsen, Germany show Actual prison camp Total Deaths at 271,301 people. The
Bad Arolsen archives list everyone who lived and died in all the German labor camps. The question naturally arises as to
what is the total number recorded in this tremendous archive. Clearly, the managers of this archive are not at liberty to
tell of this or they would be jailed for so awful a crime, but we know the FACTS! But fortunately, the Red Cross Report
was a 1650 page detailed report that never mentioned a gas chamber and showed approximately 271,300 total dead for all the
1950 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “…most of the memoirs and reports
[of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated
self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” —
Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65.
1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — ANTI-GERMAN HATE SPEECH shows where these motives
to LIE AND SPREAD HATE PROPAGANDA are focused — “Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone
of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do
otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.” — Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time
1979 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “One should not ask, how this mass
murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point
for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence
of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.” — Published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February
21, 1979 CE.
1980 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX —
Diary of Anne Frank was totally debunked by a lawsuit in a German court. German state forensic bureau examined the original
“diary” manuscript found “significant” portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen, but
ballpoint pens were not available before 1951. They also found that none of the “diary” handwriting matched
known examples of Anne’s handwriting, but all of the writing in the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore,
the entire “diary” was a postwar fake. The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded
and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank. But even more
weird is the Diary was Co-Authored by Anne Franks Father and controlled by SWISS in Basel, Switzerland. All done years after
the war. http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/diary-of-anne-frank-is-fraud.html
1982 CE-2001 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “Holocaust
denial” laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term Jewish campaign. In 1982 CE, the Institute for Jewish Affairs
in London, a London-based agency of the World Jewish Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade
and pressure governments to outlaw “Holocaust denial.” The anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted
in several European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted its “Holocaust denial”
statute in 1985 CE (amended in 1994 CE), France in 1990 CE, Austria in 1992 CE, Belgium in 1995 CE, and Slovakia in 2001
CE. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign, the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists in June
1998 CE called for new and more severe laws against “Holocaust denial.”
1991 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf (1964 CE-Today) is an author
and chemist who was amazingly convicted of the SILLY CHARGE of Holocaust denier. After his military service with the German
Air Force, in 1990 CE he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research at Stuttgart, where he prepared a PhD
thesis. In 1991 CE, Rudolf began work on a paper entitled Report on the formation and verifiability of cyanide compounds
in the Auschwitz “gas chambers” and in 1993 CE, this work was reported in the media, and Rudolf was told not
to enter the Max Planck Institute again without permission. When he did so, his employment was terminated without notice.
OTHER VICTIMS OF HOLY-COST INSANITY include Ernst Zundel, Sylvia Stolz and Vincent Reynouard.
1985 CE and 1988 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Zundel Trials, a famous court
trial with expert witness Raul Hilberg was at a loss when asked: “Can you give me one scientific report that shows
the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” — Zundel’s Defense counsel Doug Christie
asked Hilberg in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination. “I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied. “You are
(at a loss) because you can’t,” Christie said. “The witness countered that there are aerial photographs
of concentration camps, examples of ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal
nature of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the camps.” During this trial, not a single eyewitness
for the plaintiff could be found. Zundel won and they finally stopped harassing him.
Ernst Zundel, a Canadian, was denied entry into
the United States and his story is an example of the HOAX EXPOSED COMPLETELY.
$80 BILLION to $100 BILLION “HOLY-COST”
SCAM SINCE WW II AND EVEN BACK TO 1915 OR BEFORE!
TIME TO GET THE FACTS OUT AND END THE LIES AND
1995 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison for “inciting racial hatred” (TELLING THE TRUTH) by the district
court of Stuttgart because of his dissertation research now known as the “Rudolf Report”. Rudolf avoided prison
by fleeing to Spain, England, and finally to the United States. All the while, criminal investigations continued in Germany.
1995 CE: KABALISTIC ORIGINS OF THE SIX MILLION FIGURE — Ben Weintraub’s
book, Holocaust Dogma Of Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic occultism involved in the number. 6,000,000
as the number of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the
Kabala. The 6 million number was published over and over in newspaper as revealed by Ashkenazi Friedman from 1916 CE-Today!
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw
his application for a final PhD examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. The university said
Rudolf used his academic credentials or knowledge to commit a crime – Meaning facts about “HOLY-COST!”
Rudolf knew his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but stated that his findings at Auschwitz and Birkenau “completely
shattered his world view” when he found only insignificant traces of cyanide compounds can be found in the samples
taken from Auschwitz.
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING —
“It is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability to directly establish the reality of the
existence of homicidal gas chambers.” — French ‘historian’ Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien
(Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996 CE, p. 14.
1997 CE-2013 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf began to publish books on Holocaust CHEMICAL FACTS and
founded Castle Hill Publishers in 1997 based in Hastings, England and was linked to Theses & Dissertations Press as
its American outlet. In 2000, Rudolf initiated an English language Holocaust Handbooks Series which, as of 2013, encompassed
25 titles. Until his arrest in late 2005, he published the now defunct “Quarterly journal for free historical research.”
2000 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “Care must be taken not to give a
platform for deniers… or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational
argument.” — ‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’ at the Stockholm International Forum,
2003 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
The Holocaust story has served to create a highly profitable business for large numbers of Jews, something which the honest
Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein described as the “Holocaust Industry” in his book of the same name (The Holocaust
Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, Verso Books, 2003). The “Holocaust” served (and
still serves) well in justifying the Zionist seizure of Palestine. Any criticism of the overt human rights violations and
atrocities committed by the state of Israel against the Palestinians is dismissed as “anti- Semitism.”
THE OUTRIGHT EMBARRASSMENT OF ISRAELIS
AND THEIR EVIL IS TOSSED BACK AT THEM BY NORMAN FINKELSTEIN, A BRAVE AND HONEST LEADER!
2004 CE-2010 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Germar Rudolf, THE TRUTH TELLER, in district court of Mannheim grabbed Rudolf’s bank account to rob 55% of
Rudolf’s business turnover from the years 2001-2004, but at that time the account contained only some €5,000.
Rudolf and his associates had earned this money by selling TRUTH TELLING publications banned in Germany, but Rudolf’s
business was in the UK and the US. In 2004, Rudolf married a US citizen and settled in Chicago, and they later had a child.
For some reason he had to apply for political asylum, or at least for the right not to be expelled, but this was turned down.
In 2005 Immigration Services said that Rudolf did not have a right to stay with his family and was extradited to Germany
and on arrival was arrested by the police and transferred to a prison in Rottenburg, then to another in Stuttgart in Baden-Württemberg.
In 2007, the German Court sentenced him to two years and six months in prison for TELLING THE TRUTH or as the court put
it “inciting hatred, disparaging the dead, and libel.” The German police confiscated copies of his “Lectures
on the Holocaust” and destroyed. In 2009 the TRUTH TELLER Rudolf was released from prison and now lives in the US
with his wife and daughter.
2007 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
“The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does
disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings
into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools,
and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these
trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”
– John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust. https://codoh.com/library/document/680/
2015 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The
rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements
of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.” – Robert
Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical and scientific level – click link:
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “If the Holocaust were
unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this
is the only historical topic that is regulated by penal law. This is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider
this topic to be the most important issue to keep under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing powers are the
real criminals—not the historical dissidents they send to prison.” – Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can
and Will Destroy the Holocaust Establishment, https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/07/18/logic-and-reason-can-and-will-destroy-the-holocaust-establishment/
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The
rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements
of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.” – Robert
Faurisson. When we ask detailed and pointed questions, our historians fall short. They don’t really know when, where,
or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how it was possible. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly
held thousands of bodies. And they refuse to even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. The ‘Holocaust’
storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and
persecuted and even put in prison. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny, but lies do.
2017 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The three victor nations, Russia, America
and Britain, collaborated together at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the
post-war moral high ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two million tons of bombs. People were loath
to believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American intelligence
had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience. Only then, I suggest, does it start
to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was the original WMD hoax.” – Dr. Nicholas
Kollerstrom Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality.
Today CE: ASHKEANAZI FACTS — We know Ashkenazis are the Masters of Make-Believe to make the world believe
in Death Camps. They now infest Hollywood with the fakery and lies continually spewing out falsehoods to gain sympathy for
a group of ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE CRIMINALS attacking Americans and Europeans with their propaganda and outright lies.
Today’s Hollywood Ashkenazis are the heirs of the original crop of wartime Hollywood producers and directors who were
called into service by the U.S. Army to “document” (PROPAGANDIZE) the concentration camps.
WESTERN LABOR CAMPS vs EASTERN DEATH CAMPS
For the past 20 years or so, it has been fun
to watch how the ever-evolving field of "Holocaust Studies" adjusts to new discoveries which
contradict the original narrative. For example, when it became apparent that there wasn't actually any
documentation to support the Holohoax, the Holohoaxers abandoned their 50 year old mantra of "It's
well documented!", and seamlessly transitioned to: "The Germans destroyed the documents"
Another addition to Holocaustianity is the distinction that is
now made between "work camps" and "extermination camps." You
see, as pathetic and self-abasing as modern day German guilt-trippers are, they still aren't going to
say that a certain German-based camp, Dachau for example, had homicidal gas chambers when it didn't;
or that "millions" died there when they didn't. The fact that the West, in spite of its intellectual
tyranny, was still much more open and free that the old Soviet bloc, began to complicate things for
the Holohoaxers. For that reason, all
of internment camps which were located in the West are now described as "work camps" whereas seven
of those located in Poland and Ukraine have been classified as "extermination camps."
The chart below was copied from 'The Jewish Virtual Library " -- which pulled the information from the Simon
Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps" (in
red) are said to have been located:
|Treblinka || |
You see that? Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one
in Ukraine; but zero in either of the western states Germany, France or the Netherlands.
That's a very weird "anomaly." Why the east-west divide between "work" and
It's elementary dear reader,
elementary. If you know anything at all about World War II and the subsequent birth of "The Iron
Curtain", you know that no western researchers,
no aid workers, no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human rights activists, no investigative
researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to poke around in Joe Stalin's Communist post-war front
yard of Poland or Ukraine. Therein lies the rub! Hence, the Holohoaxers, both then and
now, can make any claim they want to in regard to what took place in the air-tight closed east.
In 1945, it was essential for the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation
camps" mainly in Stalin's Poland & Ukraine. Seventy years later, it is essential the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation
camps" completely in Poland & Ukraine. By now,
the Stalinist tales of "gas chambers" and "millions dead" have become ossified. The
modern-day Poles and Russians have no interest in
rocking this leaky boat because they weren't the ones falsely accused.
The Bottom Line:
Belief in the purely eastern-front "extermination"
Holohoax necessarily requires blind faith in the press releases of Joe Stalin and his propaganda
henchmen, as well as claims about the eastern camps which could never be verified!
"We would never lie to you. Trust us."
Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1, Jews for Hitler...
View the REAL PLAN for a massive HOLOCAUST perpetrated by JEWS titled EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (Part 5)...
used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work
The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 7-9.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA.
By Jennifer White, administrative director of TBR;
published here with kind permission from TBR.
This digitized version © 2001 by The Scriptorium.
from being the "death camps" as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in
the business of extermination. They were work camps, critical to the German war effort. But did you know that the Jewish workers
were compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The
prisoner monetary system was conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau and still existed
in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Here is the story of the money the
court historians do not want you to even suspect existed.
Piles of incinerated corpses were indicting images at Nuremberg, used to prove that the German-run concentration
camps during World War II were intended for purposes of exterminating the Jews of Europe. However, a plethora of documentary
evidence, long suppressed, shows that prisoners were relatively well-treated, compensated for their hard work and allowed
to purchase luxuries to which even the German public did not have ready access. This is not the image of abject deprivation
that the Holocaust lobby would like you to entertain.
The above collage, taken from the cover of Das Lagergeld der
Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945 by Albert Pick and Carl Siemsen, shows just a sample of the money printed
for camps and ghettos. The predominantly-white note on the right says: "Jewish Money. Only legal as a means of payment
for Jewish work within the ghetto Sokolka. City Treasury of Sokolka, The Mayor."
The irrefutable proof is the existence of a means of exchange for goods and services: Money.
There were at least 134 separate issues, in different denominations and styles, for such notorious places as Auschwitz, Buchenwald,
Dachau, Oranienburg, Ravensbrück, Westerbork and at least 15 other camps. (See Paper Money of the World Part I: Modern
Issues of Europe by Arnold Keller, Ph.D., 1956, pp. 23-25 for a complete listing.)
A monetary system was also in existence in the ghettos, most notably Theresienstadt and Lodz,
which produced beautiful notes (veritable works of art) that make U.S. currency look dull.
There are numerous dealers in rare currency and numismatics who specialize in selling "concentration
camp money" or "Holocaust money" as it has been sometimes called. But the very fact of its existence does not
seem to have raised questions - as it should have - about what really did (and did not) happen inside the so-called "death
camps" where the Holocaust scrip was circulating in the first place.
This scrip was not negotiable outside of the camp for which it was issued. This decreased the chance of a successful
escape and made it impossible for the general public to purchase some of the rare luxuries available in the camps. According
to Albert Pick in Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945:
were not paid for the work but were given "coupons" now and then to buy things in the "Kantine".... As
the war progressed badly and the number of workers declined, the KZ worker potential became important. Offers of "premiums"
and other advantages were made to the inmates, tobacco was offered and even visits to bordellos.... In order that these scrips
could not be used outside the camps, special money was printed.
Letter from Prisoner No. 11647 Block 28/3 Dachau KIII on September 8, 1940 to his relative in Litzmannstadt (Lodz):
I must write you something
about myself. I am very well. In the canteen I buy honey, marmalade, cookies, fruit and other food. If you worry about me,
you'll indeed be committing a sin. I have more reason to worry about you.... (Letters from the Doomed: Concentration
Camp Correspondence 1940-1945, Richard S. Geehr.)
was a payment schedule at Theresienstadt utilizing Th. kr. (Theresienstadt kroner) as the unit of exchange. (The Shekel
Vol. XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983 p. 29). The breakdown looked like this:
Working men, according to their jobs: 105-205 Th. kr.
Working women, according
to their jobs: 95-205 Th. kr.
Part-time workers: 80 Th. kr.
Caretakers: 70 Th. kr.
War-wounded and holders
of the Iron Cross, First Class degree or higher: 195 Th. kr.
Prominente (doctors, professors, scientists,
well-known cultural artists and politicians): 145 Th. kr.
To put this in perspective, a cup of coffee cost 2 Th. kr. The circulation in Theresienstadt was such that it was
necessary to print over 5 million notes. See Papirove Penize Na Uzemi Ceskoslovenska 1762-1975, Second Edition,
1975, Hradek Kralove, trans. by Julius Sem, pp. 134-135.
The first worker's camp to have its own scrip was Oranienburg. Before using the camp scrip they used German currency in nearby
towns, but the authorities decided to centralize. Currency was exchanged for camp money, less 30%. (The Shekel, Vol
XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983, p. 40: "Concentration Camp Money of the Nazi Holocaust" by Steven Feller.)
Similarly at Buchenwald:
Each prisoner was allowed
up to 10 marks per week to be used for the purchase of cigarettes at the camp canteen, other canteen purchases, brothel visits,
or credit to a savings account. The regulations went on to specify that a visit to a brothel would cost 2 marks for which
1.5 marks would be kept by the SS and 0.5 marks would be used for "expenses." (Ibid., p. 41.)
Was there a similar situation at all of the other camps
- at least those that issued currency? As this includes Auschwitz, it would be shocking indeed to even consider marmalade
and cigarettes being purchased in this "death camp." Even the existence of money in camps gives us a look at what
life was really like there, yet this information has yet to make it to the History Channel.
| || || || |
|Infamous and Intricate Camp Money
[W]e must remember that like most other Concentration Camps, Dachau also functioned as a work camp. This explains the appearance
of paper tokens printed in 1944.... Dachau's tokens were of three different values: 1, 2 and 3 marks.
The prisoner's identification number is written on the front of this green note, alongside the date when it was
issued, January 31, 1945. In fact, all of Dachau's tokens list the prisoner's identification numbers." Stahl, pp. 18-
a death camp it would seem that there was very little need for money." (The Shekel, Vol. XVI, No. 2, March-April
1983, p. 43.)
A Dachau camp note.
An Auschwitz camp note.
Print runs for Theresienstadt Kroner
1 Th. kr.
2 Th. kr.
5 Th. kr.
10 Th. kr.
20 Th. kr.
50 Th. kr.
100 Th. kr.
| Size |
100 x 50 mm
x 55 mm
120 x 58 mm
125 x 63 mm
135 x 66
140 x 77 mm
150 x 77 mm
See: The Shekel Vol. XVI, No. 2,
March/April 1983, p. 33.
| || |
These beautiful Theresienstadt notes, complete
with watermarks, demonstrate the high-quality artwork and printing of the money.
Colors of the
different types of currency in Lodz.
In print runs in 1940, 1942 and 1944:
50 Pfg. Violet
2 RM Light Brown
5 RM Dark Brown
Lodz ghetto money.
from Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945
by Albert Pick and Carl Siemsen.
American Israel Numismatic Association
Pick, Albert. Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und
D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945, Munich, Battenberg Publishers, 1976.
Michael H., Das Papiergeld im besetzten Deutschland 1945-1949, Regenstauf: Gietl, 1994.
Stahl, Zvi, Jewish Ghettos and Concentration Camps' Money, 1933-1945, London: D. Richman Books, 1990.
Campbell, Lance K., Dachau concentration camp scrip, Margate, Florida: American Israel Numismatic
The Numismatist, April 1981, by Steven Feller.
Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine, 1965, 1996, "POW Money and Medals" by Slabaugh,
Schultze, Manfred, Unsere Arbeit - unsere Hoffnung: Das Ghetto
in Lodz 1940-1945, Schwalmtal: Phil-Creativ, 1995.
Sem, Julius, Standard
Catalog of World Paper Money, 1977 (Theresienstadt notes).
Vol. I, No. 2, Oct. 1976. Yasha L. Beresiner.
Click on this text to watch a six minute video titled: Hard Facts Of The Holocaust Lies...
Click on this text to examine the enhanced HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE...
“New Pages” of Anne Frank Diary Prove that Her Father Wrote
Most of the Book
Two “newly discovered” pages from the
“Diary of Anne Frank” — which supposedly contain risqué jokes — are in fact further proof
that the book attributed to the Jewish teenager was in fact written by her father — because the “hidden”
writing is, like most of the rest of the “diary,” in her father Otto Frank’s handwriting.
(The New Observer)
The “newly-discovered” pages were announced
at a press conference at the “Anne Frank House” museum in Amsterdam, where researchers apparently were able
to remove two brown paper pasted pages and “read” the obscured writing underneath using lamps and optical character
The compliant Jewish lobby controlled
media focused all its attention on the contents of the “new pages,” but ignored the obvious fact of the difference
in handwriting styles on the new pages, with the “new material” all in her father’s handwriting, which
contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself.
In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war, and who then passed it
off as “real” in order to sell it as a “holocaust memoir.”
The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times that year, when the copyright holders
to the diary admitted Otto Frank’s involvement in an attempt to extend their control of the manuscript.
As the New York Times pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s red-checked diary
and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly contained her words, written while hiding from
the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.”
copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in
February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February 2015.
But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to extend copyright
on the book past the 70 year cut-off period—by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author”
The implications of this admission are obvious.
As the New York Times put it:
the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled its intentions a year ago, warnings about the change have provoked
a furor as the deadline approaches. Some people opposed to the move have declared that they would defy the foundation and
publish portions of her text.
Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès
Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been the most
vociferous and are organizing a challenge. “If you follow their arguments, it means that they have lied for years
about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.”
The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed to be “Anne Frank’s
diary” was in fact written by her father after the war—a fact which also explains the use of ball point pen in
the “diary,” a writing device which only became available after 1945.
Click on this text to examine the Anne Frank Fraud.
The Secular Religion of the 'HOLOCAUST'
religion of "the Holocaust" is a secular one: it belongs to the lay world; it is profane; in actuality, it has
at its disposal the secular arm, that is a temporal authority with dreaded power. It has its dogma, its commandments, its
decrees, its prophets and its high priests. As one revisionist has observed, it has its circle of saints, male and female,
amongst whom, for example, Saint Anne (Frank), Saint Simon (Wiesenthal) and Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy places,
its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (and macabre) buildings and its relics ...
Click on this text to examine PEOPLE EXPOSING THE HOLOCAUST LIES...
Click on this text to watch JIM RIZOLI - HOLO-FACTS
Click on this text to examine an actual holocaust perpetrated by JEWS upon the Ukrainians.
Allied Attacks Killed Thousands
of Camp Inmates: The 1945 'Cap Arcona' and 'Thielbek' Sinkings
prisoners of German wartime concentration camps who perished while in German custody
are routinely regarded as "victims of Nazism" -- even if they lost their
lives as direct or
indirect result of
Allied policy ... Among the German concentration camp prisoners who perished
at Allied hands were some 7,000 inmates who were killed during the war's final week
were being evacuated in three
large German ships that were attacked by British war
planes. This little-known tragedy is one of history's greatest maritime disasters.
Auschwitz Chemistry: How Science Proves The ‘Final Solution’
Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives
“Gassing Clothing”. Left: Healthy inmates at work sterilizing clothing. Right: Healthy
prisoners at Auschwitz working in one of the larger clothing disinfestation chambers in the camp.
Above: The Auschwitz camp employed
a number of delousing stations, which used steam and Zyklon-B to kill lice in prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave
number 2, seen from the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing was put on hangers attached to a trolley and
pushed inside the chamber. Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was pushed into the chamber on two short
rails. The disinfection stations were constructed with double doors so that the infected and cleaned clothes would not be
mixed together. This picture was taken while the camp was operational.
Source: Peter Winter, Chapter 10- Auschwitz
The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau
Defenders of the Holocaust story have attempted to discredit scientific
reports which disprove the existence of homicidal gas chambers at German camps during World War II. For example, Deborah
Lipstadt’s defense attorney, Richard Rampton, referred in court to The Leuchter Report as “…a
piece of so-called research which is not worth the paper it is written on…”
Dr. Richard Green states about
to the fact that he actually has some understanding of chemistry, many of his deceptions are more sophisticated than other
Holocaust deniers…Ultimately, he engages in the same deceptions and specious arguments as [Fred] Leuchter and [Walter]
Lüftl , but the case he makes for those deceptions and arguments involves more difficult chemistry.”
This article will discuss
attempts by chemists to discredit scientific reports which disprove the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau
during World War II.
In 1988, the Canadian government put Ernst Zündel on trial a second time for
the criminal offense of knowingly disseminating false news about “the Holocaust.” As part of his defense in this
trial, Zündel commissioned the American gas-chamber expert Fred Leuchter to make a scientific examination of the alleged
homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. The resulting Leuchter Report is the first
scientific study of the alleged German homicidal gas chambers.
In addition to reporting that
the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were structurally unsuitable for gassing, Leuchter
researched the chemical properties of the Zyklon B fumigant. Leuchter found that Zyklon B is a highly toxic compound that
releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas. The released hydrogen cyanide gas clings to surfaces and reacts chemically with
materials containing iron, forming ferrocyanide compounds that have a distinctive blue color called Prussian Blue. Since
building materials normally contain a certain amount of rust (iron oxide, usually between one and four percent), repeated
exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas would result in Prussian Blue staining on the walls of the alleged gas chambers.
Leuchter took forensic samples
from the alleged gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing facility at Birkenau. The samples
were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory found no significant ferrocyanide compound
traces in the samples taken from the alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the sample from a wall of the Birkenau delousing
facility had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter concluded that this result would be impossible
if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas.
Germar Rudolf, a certified
chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by writing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992. The Rudolf
Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused on engineering and chemical aspects of the alleged
homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all of the delousing
facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian
Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing facilities
have Prussian Blue staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz
Rudolf also took
samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Similar to Leuchter’s
samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant traces of ferrocyanide residue on the same order of
magnitude found in any other building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all showed very high ferrocyanide
residues. Rudolf determined that, if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had taken place in the alleged homicidal
gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit similar ferrocyanide residue as the delousing
chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded that mass gassings with Zyklon B did not occur in the alleged homicidal gas chambers
at Auschwitz and Birkenau.
Kraków Institute of Forensic Research
The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994
that attempted to refute the Leuchter Report. The team from this forensic institute led by Dr. Jan Markiewicz
claims not to have understood how it was possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed
to hydrogen cyanide gas. The researchers therefore excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron cyanide compounds from their
analyses, resulting in much lower cyanide traces for the delousing chambers. Their analysis made it practically impossible
to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a cyanide residue
of close to zero. The Kraków researchers concluded from their analysis that since the gas chambers and delousing
facilities all had the same amount of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers.
Germar Rudolf gave the Kraków researchers irrefutable proof that
Prussian Blue can be formed in walls exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas, citing a case document in expert literature. The authors of the Kraków report refused to change their report and admit they made a mistake. Rudolf writes:
The only ‘scientific’
attempt to refute Frederick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis turns out to be one of the biggest scientific frauds
of the 20th century. How desperate must they be—those who try to defend the established version of the Holocaust, i.e.,
the alleged systematic extermination of Jews in homicidal ‘gas chambers’, that they resort to such obviously
British science historian
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom also refuted the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report, as succinctly summarized
by the retired professor of the philosophy of science Dr. James H. Fetzer:
When the Auschwitz museum was confronted with the fact that the innocuous delousing chambers
at Auschwitz have blue walls–due to being saturated with blue iron cyanide compounds–but the alleged homicidal
gas chambers have not, they commissioned their own chemical research. Instead of testing wall samples for
the chemicals that had caused the blue stains, the researchers they commissioned simply excluded those
chemicals from their analysis by employing a procedure that could not detect them. They justified this measure with the
claim that they did not understand exactly how these compounds could form and that they might therefore be mere artifacts.
Researchers who don’t understand what they are investigating have no business becoming involved. In this case, however,
it appears to be deliberate. They have deliberately ignored an obvious explanation–that Zyklon B was only used for
delousing–which would have remedied their lack of comprehension. As a result of this failure to adhere to the
principles of science, they produced a report of no scientific value, which they used to arrive at a predetermined conclusion.
Dr. Arthur Robert Butz
writes in regard to the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:
The argument, to the extent that it was intelligible enough to be
summarized at all, was that they did not understand how the iron-cyanide compounds got to be there, so they decided to ignore
them in reaching their conclusions. I don’t understand how the moon got there, so I will ignore all effects associated
with it, such as tides. I hope I don’t drown.”
Read Previous Article: Wear’s War Movie Review: “Mr Death” An Epic Propaganda Stuff Up & The Jewish Panic To Remedy It
Dr. James Roth
Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received
samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as an Analytical Chemist at Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the
tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced
by a reaction of the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply in porous materials such as brick and iron.
Dr. Roth later changed his
testimony in a documentary movie titled Mr. Deathproduced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:
Cyanide is a surface reaction.
It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns in diameter. Crush this sample
up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go looking for it, you’re going
to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
writes that Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death are wrong:
The 1999 film about Leuchter features an interview with
the chemist [Dr. James Roth] who had done the analysis of his wall-samples back in 1988. He had done this “blind,”
i.e. with no knowledge of where they had come from, which was correct scientific procedure. During the second Zündel
trial in Toronto in 1988 he testified under oath concerning the method used and what Leuchter had sent him. He said back
then that hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate into brick and mortar. But then, when he was interviewed again by Morris
for his documentary, he suddenly stated that the results were quite meaningless, because the cyanide could only have soaked
a few microns into the brickwork. Wow, that was quite a whopper. Mortar and brickwork are highly porous
to hydrogen cyanide, obviously so because the delousing chambers were more or less equally blue inside and out, it had soaked
right through. But you can watch him on video explaining this, as if he were confusing brick and mortar with rock. The latter
will only absorb cyanide to a few microns of its surface.
Germar Rudolf writes in
regard to Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death: “It can be shown that Prof. Dr. James Roth is wrong
for the following reasons:
- It is a fact that the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof, and Majdanek are saturated
with cyanide compounds, and this not only superficially, but into the depth of the masonry, as I have demonstrated by taking
samples from different depths of the wall. Compare in this regard my mortar and plaster Sample Pairs 9 & 11, 12 &
13, 19a & b…, which were each taken at the same spot but at different depths, as well as Sample 17, taken from
below the overlying lime plaster (which is thus similar to 19b). These values prove that hydrogen cyanide can rather easily
reach deep layers of plaster and mortar. But even the other samples taken from the surface prove that Prof. Roth’s
allegation is wrong: Provided that most of the cyanide detectable today is present in the form of iron cyanide (Iron Blue
and other cyanoferrates), as Prof. Roth assumes himself, his thesis would mean that 10% to 75% of the iron content of these
samples are located in the upper 10 micrometers thin layer of the samples (0.010 mm), i.e., they are located
in less than 1% of the entire sample mass. The rest of the samples, however, would have been massively deprived of iron.
How this migration of a major portion of iron to a thin surface layer would have happened is inexplicable to me. Fact is
that this simply could not happen.
- Furthermore, expert
literature is detailed about the following:
- Hydrogen cyanide is an extremely mobile chemical compound with physical properties comparable to water…
- Water vapor can quite easily penetrate masonry material, and thus also hydrogen
- Hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate thick,
porous layers like walls…
- In addition,
it is generally known that cement and lime mortar are highly porous materials, comparable for instance to sponges. In such
materials, there does not exist anything like a defined layer of 0.01 mm beyond which hydrogen cyanide could not diffuse,
as there can also be no reason, why water could not penetrate a sponge deeper than a millimeter. Steam, for example, which
behaves physically comparable to hydrogen cyanide, can very easily penetrate walls.
- Finally, the massive discolorations of the outside of the walls of the disinfestation chambers
in Birkenau and Stutthof, as shown in this expert report, are clearly visible and conclusive evidence for the fact of how
easily hydrogen cyanide and its soluble derivatives can and do penetrate such walls.
As a professor of analytical chemistry, Prof. Roth must know this, so one
can only wonder why he spreads such outrageous nonsense. That Prof. Roth is indeed a competent chemist can be seen from what
he said during his testimony under oath as an expert witness during the above mentioned Zündel trial..: ‘In
porous materials such as brick or mortar, the Prussian blue [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as
long as the surface stayed open, but as the Prussian blue formed, it was possible that it would seal the porous
material and stop the penetration.’
…It is also revealing that Prof. Roth mentioned during this interview that, if he had known where Leuchter’s
samples originated from, his analytical results would have been different. Does that mean that Prof. Roth manipulates his
result according to whether or not he likes the origin of certain samples? Such an attitude is exactly the reason why one
should never tell an ‘independent’ laboratory about the origin of the samples to be analyzed, simply because
‘independence’ is a very flexible term when it comes to controversial topics. What Prof. Dr. Roth has demonstrated
here is only his lack of professional honesty.”
Dr. Richard Green
Dr. Richard Green, who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Stanford University, agrees
with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassings with hydrogen cyanide.
However, Dr. Green offers a possible alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers having
blue staining. Green writes: “…the discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought
to make one consider what possible processes could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it
possible that materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings?
Not enough is known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes
that took place within those buildings.”
Dr. Green’s speculation
is absurd. Why would the Germans lean materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN against the outside walls
of the delousing chambers? Dr. Green is desperate to find an alternative reason for the heavy blue staining on the outside
walls of the delousing chambers.
Germar Rudolf writes in regard
to Dr. Green’s speculation:
One major rule of science is that it is impermissible to immunize a theory against refutation, here in particular
by inventing untenable auxiliary hypotheses to shore up an otherwise shaky thesis…This is exactly what Dr. Green
is doing: coming up with a ludicrous attempt at explaining a fact which does not fit into his theory. Yet instead of fixing
his theory, he tries to bend reality.”
Dr. Green also challenges
the possibility of formation of any noticeable quantities of Prussian Blue in the alleged homicidal gas chambers. Dr. Green
writes: “The difference in total cyanides (Prussian blue + non-Prussian blue) owes to the fact that Prussian blue formed
efficiently in the case of the delousing chambers but not in the homicidal gas chambers, and Prussian blue once formed is
likely to remain.”
Dr. Green is not able to provide
any convincing evidence why Prussian Blue would not form efficiently in the homicidal gas chambers. For example, Dr. Green
states that masonry in the alleged homicidal gas chambers has a neutral pH value which does not allow for the formation
of cyanide salts. Germar Rudolf writes: “But if that were true, how come huge amounts of cyanides did accumulate in
the walls of the disinfestation chambers?”
Rudolf has documented with
expert literature on the chemistry of building materials that the cement mortars and concretes used in the alleged homicidal
gas chambers are noticeably alkaline for many weeks, months, or even years. These walls would have been very much inclined
to accumulate cyanide salts and to form Prussian Blue, even more so than the lime plaster of the disinfestation chambers.
The alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau could not have been used to exterminate
hundreds of thousands of people as described in pro-Holocaust literature for numerous reasons: 1) they did not have escape-proof
doors and windows; 2) they did not have panic-proof equipment; 3) they did not have technically gastight doors and shutters;
4) they had no provision to quickly release and distribute the poison gas; and 5) they had no effective device to ventilate
or otherwise render ineffective the poison gas after the execution.
By contrast, Germany built
highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice and save inmate lives. By
one estimate, the SS at Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to bring the typhus epidemics raging there
under control. An enormous amount of information exists concerning these German delousing facilities, but no similar information exists regarding the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
The roof of the semi-underground
Morgue #1 of Crematorium II at Birkenau, which is said to have been the building’s homicidal gas chamber, remains
intact to some degree today. Contrary to eyewitness testimony, that roof has no Zyklon-B-introduction holes. This has been
acknowledged by pro-Holocaust researcher Robert Jan van Pelt. Since it is impossible to close holes measuring 70 x 70 cm
from a concrete roof without leaving clearly visible traces, it is certain that no Zyklon-B-introduction holes ever existed
at Crematorium II. Consequently, Zyklon B could not have been introduced through the roof at this morgue as alleged by pro-Holocaust
As documented in this article,
chemists adhering to the orthodox Holocaust narrative have failed to explain why the walls of the delousing facilities at
Auschwitz/ Birkenau are permeated with Prussian Blue, while nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal
gas chambers. The only reasonable explanation is that Zyklon B was never used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
Nicholas Kollerstrom writes:
…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp let us merely measure cyanide
in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’thappen.”
 Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence From the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana
University Press, 2002, pp. 137, 435.
 Richard J. Green, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/.
 Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw,
AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 337. See the currently available edition of Leuchter’s report: Fred A.
Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition, 4th ed.,
Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2015.
 Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” The Journal of Historical
Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 7.
 Leuchter, Fred A., “The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why,” The Journal of Historical Review,
Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 138-139.
 Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw,
AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.
 Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” The Journal of Historical
Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 9.
 Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw,
AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 369.
 Preface to: Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great
Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, pp. 12-13.
 Butz, Arthur R., “Historical Past vs. Political Present,” The Journal of Historical Review,
Vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, p. 15.
 Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in theCanadian “False
News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.
 https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s
Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, David John Caldwell Irving vs. (1) Penguin Books Limited,
(2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf,
 Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle
Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 66.
 Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A
Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 342-345.
 Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), pp. 18, 36, 41.
 Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A
Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 347-349.
 Ibid., p. 348.
 Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), p. 51.
 Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A
Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 345.
 Ibid., pp. 345-346.
 Ibid., pp. 174-175.
 Ibid., pp. 175, 293.
 Berg, Friedrich R., “Zyklon B and the German Delousing Chambers,” Journal of Historical Review,
Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1986, pp. 73-94; http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p-73_Berg.html.
 Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A
Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 114.
 Ibid., pp. 143-147.
 Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle
Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.
Ernst and Ingrid Zündel. Never forgotten, always cherished.
Their contribution to #Justice4Germans is immeasurable: The Desperate Measures To Enforce Belief In One & ONLY One Historical Event Are Escalating In Absurdity: Old Ladies
Get Jail, Rapists Go Free</a
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the Holocaust in a systematic
way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.
How Israeli Post Zionists Manipulate the Holocaust (Part 2)
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the Holocaust in a systematic way in
order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.
The Holocaust of Truth Gilad Atzmon
Gilad Atzmon discusses the hate campaign against him, the shutdown of free speech and his new book Being in
Time: A Post-Political Manifesto.
Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist tells the story of how I first became aware of revisionist
arguments challenging the orthodox Holocaust story, how it felt-how it felt was that it made me feel ashamed and made the
palms of my hands sweat-and the first information I had the misfortune (?) to discover that there were serious questions
to be asked about what I had believed all my life, with all my heart, about the unique monstrosity of the Germans.
A 1997 speech on Internet Free Speech and Revisionism - Rae West. This video includes
Questions-and-Answers. Before the big revolution that the Internet caused on media, consider the next seven points, taken
into consideration that some of this still happens now: 1. Revisionist criticisms aren't new, but have been suppressed;
2. There have been and are many hard-working revisionists; 3. The supposedly heavyweight historians don't debate; 4. No
technical descriptions or investigations of 'gas chambers'; 5. Damning 'confessions' were extracted under torture; 6. Demographic
figures have been avoided, and mythology substituted; 7. There are no photos of gas chambers.
Survivor’ Admits He Lied About Everything..
Hirt said he fabricated story of being sent to camp and meeting
doctor Josef Mengele to ‘keep memories alive’ about history of the Holocaust
A Pennsylvania man who claimed for years to have escaped from Auschwitz,
met track and field star Jesse Owens and Nazi doctor Josef Mengele,
confessed on Friday that he had fabricated the entire story... of course.
“I am writing today to apologize publicly for harm caused to anyone because of my
inserting myself into the descriptions of life in Auschwitz,” Joseph Hirt, 86, wrote in a letter sent to his local
paper, LNP, this week. For years, Hirt gave public speeches at schools around the US about his experiences in the second world war, including
his Jewish family’s flight from Poland to Belgrade.
“I was not a prisoner there. I did not intend to lessen
or overshadow the events which truly happened there by falsely claiming to have been personally involved.”
“I was wrong. I ask forgiveness,” he added. “I determined at that moment to do everything
in my power to prevent the loss of the truth about wartime life (and death) at Auschwitz.”
But he also told people that he was arrested by the
Nazis, sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz, and met Mengele, the SS physician who tortured prisoners of the concentration camp.
Hirt claimed to have escaped under an electric fence at the camp.
He added an extraordinary prologue
and epilogue to the story, saying that he saw Adolf Hitler turn his back on Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, and that he met Eleanor Roosevelt and Owens after his arrival
in the United States.
Earlier this year, New York history teacher Andrew Reid became suspicious of Hirt’s
story and wrote a refutation of many of Hirt’s points.
The names of concentration camp victims and survivors
are publicly available, and there is no record of Hirt at Auschwitz or elsewhere.
Hirt (showing his fake tattoo
in the photo above) admitted in his letter that he had tattooed the camp number of Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi, the acclaimed
author and chemist, on his left forearm:
“In no way an attempt to take on his
identity, but in an effort to incorporate his symbol as a way of remembering him.”
Reid also found that Hirt’s escape story did not fit with camp records, that Mengele did not arrive at the camp until
after the alleged escape, and other lies, errors and far-fetched claims in Hirt’s account.
He was a six-year-old
Polish boy and extraordinarily unlikely to be anywhere near Hitler at the Olympics, for instance, and Owens’ biographer
found the snub was likely a fabrication, possibly conflated with another black sprinter’s story.
is not the first to fabricate or exaggerate a Holocaust story. Herman Rosenblat, a Polish survivor, embellished his 1993 memoir and made up some parts entirely.
At the time, historian Ken Waltzer wrote in the New Republic that he was alarmed by how quickly people accepted
Read: Anne Frank — the Jewish Girl That DIDN'T Write the Famous Auschwitz Diary
Click on this text to examine the enormity of Jewish lies regarding the HOLOCAUST HOAX...
Click on this text to examine the truth about AUSCHWITZ.
Click on this text to watch a video titled INSIDE AUSCHWITZ that reveals the truth about the work camp.
The Hoax that won’t die
How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust
By Carolyn Yeager
“the first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out
by the Nazis in Poland were supplied to newspapers around the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX
“the first authentic information about Hitler’s
decision to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry came from an unnamed German industrialist who visited Switzerland in
July 1942 and informed a Jewish friend of the World Jewish Congress … HOAX
“the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium
complex came from ‘two escaped Slovakian Jews’ working with the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX
The Holocaust is a hoax that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give
Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians use. (‘Hoax’
derives from the magic incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that it was deliberately created
to deceive and gain advantage, and continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda that got out
of control, and indeed it has slipped out of its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon, fueling
the world-wide ‘campaigns against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill of Jews and/or
But it is properly called a hoax because it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the
World Jewish Congress (WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe,
Britain and the United States.
It was inspired by rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau
work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near the sprawling I.G. Farben ‘Buna’ Rubber Plant.
Some of these inmates
organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish Government-in-Exile in London.
All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which
I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later.
This year, as every year since a resolution was established in 2005 by a voice
vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress leads the way in recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly
known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.” The media faithfully plays up the day, and governments throughout
the Western world pay tribute.
Amazing when you think about its reach. THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants”
are joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day
(however, it looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government
leaders, the Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945 was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz
camp was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army.
Yes, it’s amazing how much of our reality is created and developed without
our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly harmless (and usually disguised in moral terms) votes in
large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies.
In the articles that I have previously
published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already
been presented. In this article I will pull all this information together in an attempt to make the full case as to why
the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far more than to any other single entity. We will
see that the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the World Jewish Congress, and the final
unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations came from the WJC, also.
The World Jewish Congress
is the prime institution devoted to propagating Holocaust belief. Holocaust is part and parcel of their other main aims
of “defending Jews around the world” and “supporting Israel.”
We will begin with Udo Walendy, German historian, author and publisher, and his examination of a
very important report published in 1948 on the occasion of the second plenary assembly of the WJC in Montreux, Switzerland.
The title of the report is “Unity in Dispersion, a History of the World Jewish Congress.” It was published, and at the time I write can be read online here.
The World Jewish Congress is an openly Zionist organization. It’s name echos the first World Zionist Congress
held in Basle, Switzerland in the year 1897, convened by Dr. Theodore Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew. Herzl’s portrait
hangs in the office of the president at the WJC headquarters in New York City.
In the same spirit of uniting Jews to define and defend
their interests, the World Jewish Congress was convened for the first time 39 years later in Geneva, Switzerland by
Dr. Stephen S. Wise, another Budapest-born offspring of rabbis who was brought to New York as an infant.
At this Congress, of which they bragged of having 230 delegates representing 32 countries around the world, the vast majority (181) were
from the United States, Poland, Roumania and Great Britain. From seven countries there was only one delegate, and from the
rest, between 2 and 10. The center of worldwide Jewish interests and leadership had moved to the United States after WWI.
Nahum Goldmann, left, and Stephen Wise, right, playing on American patriotism in 1942.
Prior to this first Congress in
1936, a preparative World Jewish Conference was held in August 1932, also in Geneva. It was chaired by Dr.
Nahum Goldmann, a Russia-born Jew who grew up in Germany. Some anti-Zionist German Jewish groups refused to participate.
Goldmann defined the purpose as to establish a legitimate collective representation of all 16 million Jews in the world.
At this conference, Nahum Goldmann and Stephen Wise were entrusted with the leading positions. At two more preparative conferences
in ’33 and ’34, the rise to power of National Socialism became a main subject.
in 1936, Samuel Untermeyer, who had called for a holy war against Germany in 1933, founded a “World Anti-Nazi Council to Fight for Human Rights.” He partnered with British Unionist Walter Citrine, and the Council served as an Agent for “psychological warfare” and – concealed from the public – was to be financed by the Jewish
Defense Fund. Winston Churchill became one of its activists.]
At the 1936 Congress, Nahum Goldmann made the radical
announcement that the existing sovereignty of nations should be considered obsolete! The League of Nations should be reinforced
(militarily, apparently) to safeguard the interests of the weaker groups in the world. By these weaker groups he meant Jews.
of Jews in eastern Europe are being disenfranchised and terrorized in the name of supremacy of the state and the dominant
nation” he said, and
“Where the equal rights of a Jewish community are affected […] it becomes of common, worldwide Jewish
interest.” (Surrender of Jewish rights anywhere equals surrender everywhere.)
“We know that we can only
succeed by joining forces with the many others in the world who must fight with us.”
Goldmann also said that mankind
had to fight against “an aggression which was started by Germany,” emphasizing that “fighting against
Hitlerism is one of the most important tasks” and that “anti-Semitism must be branded an international crime.”
He also stated that “propaganda is at present one of the main instruments of foreign politics,” with boycotts
and international intelligence services required to be used as weapons. Remember this was in 1936 when Hitler was still
being admired for bringing Germany back to economic health!
Goldmann became President of the permanent Administrative
Committee and Wise President of the Executive Committee. In July 1940, the World Jewish Congress moved it’s headquarters
to New York City, with the Geneva office continuing to exist under 29-year old Dr. Gerhart Riegner and Dr. Abraham
Silberschein, maintaining contact with German-occupied countries and the International Red Cross.
WJC creates the Institute
of Jewish Affairs as a research arm
In 1941, another section of the World Jewish Congress was founded as the “Institute of Jewish Affairs.” It was assigned the task of gathering information from all parts of the world concerning Jewish affairs, with the
aim of submitting Jewish demands to the peace conference at the end of hostilities. The Jews were looking to get as much
as they could out of the war – a war in which they knew very well they were not physically fighting! They thus wanted
to emphasize their losses as Hitler’s political victims.
In order to best situate themselves, they decided to
consider the period from 1919 to 1939 an “armistice,” not a peace. They stressed that a basis must be created
by which “war crimes” could be punished retroactively from 1933. And of course, they would be the victims
of these war crimes.
In June 1942, the Advisory Staff for European Jewish Matters (of the Institute of Jewish Affairs)
met in coordination with the World Jewish Congress. Here, a demand was made for the first time that no peace negotiation
should ever be carried out without representatives of the WJC participating.
The Institute of Jewish Affairs entertained close relations
with the Geneva office and the British Section of the WJC in London. The British Section had built up a research staff
of over thirty experts, allowing the Institute to compile a remarkable amount of material, including thousands of documents,
press reports, papers, projects, drafts and manuscripts ready for printing. Some of the most important publications are:
- Zorach Warhaftig, Starvation over Europe (1943);
in Nazi Europe, Where Shall They Go? no authors named, (1941);
Ten Year War on the Jews (1943) (this book made a tremendous impression on the Allied governments and served as a basic
textbook at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal)
An important paper transmitted to the American authorities was “The Conspiracy against the Jewish People,”
the main chapters of which were headed:
- The Originally Conceived Plan
of Extermination of the Jewish People
- The Different Stages
of the Crime Against the Jewish People
- The Responsibility of Individuals and Organizations (translated
from the German original)
In Europe in January 1942, the
National committee of ‘Free France’ convened for a discussion on German war crimes. But not one reference was
made to the crimes against the Jews. So in February the World Jewish Congress asked for a specific statement with reference
to the “many and special crimes against the Jews.” It took three months before the President of the Conference
on crimes, General Wladyslaw Sikorski, replied that specifically referencing the Jews “might be equivalent to
recognizing racial theories that we all reject.” (Touché! We can see from this that not everyone was on the
same page about who were the victims of the Germans. Since the Poles evidently did not want to feature the Jews, the Jews
went around them.)
After that rejection, the British section of the World Jewish Congress in June organized their own
“Conference of the Press of the Free World” where Facts of a Systematic
Extermination of European Jewry were announced (but not revealed in the conference minutes). This would have been
the first suggestion of a planned extermination of Jews. Immediate reactions occurred in Britain and abroad. The BBC
transmitted this type of news for the first time—and there were mass demonstrations in the US (organized by Jews)
addressing war crimes and the need for the rescue of European Jewry. On 21 July 1942, Prime Minister Winston Churchill
sent a message to a meeting held in Madison Square Garden, NYC, which contained the following:
The Jews were Hitler’s first victims, and ever since they have been
in the forefront of resistance to Nazi aggression.
The World Jewish Congress jumped on this and announced that “This sentence
rightly characterized the Jews of whatever nationality as an allied people of the United Nations (which is the name
the Allies gave themselves at that time). The WJC said they wanted all Jews to be accepted as “one nation” represented
by the World Jewish Congress.
The Riegner Telegram
Sensing an opportune time, on 8 Aug 1942, young Gerhart Riegner, as Secretary of the Geneva WJC office,
sent a telegram to the British Foreign Office and the U.S. State Dept, through secure diplomatic channels the WJC was privy
to. The telegram read:
Received alarming report stating that, in the Fuehrer’s Headquarters,
a plan has been discussed, and is under consideration, according to which all Jews in countries occupied or controlled by
Germany numbering 3½ to 4 millions should, after deportation and concentration in the East, be at one blow exterminated,
in order to resolve, once and for all the Jewish question in Europe. Action is reported to be planned for the autumn. Ways
of execution are still being discussed including the use of prussic acid. We transmit this information with all the necessary
reservation, as exactitude cannot be confirmed by us. Our informant is reported to have close connexions with the highest
German authorities, and his reports are generally reliable. Please inform and consult New York.
an anonymous report, and supposedly not the first from this ‘source’. The British Foreign Office took its time
forwarding the telegram, calling for it to be investigated first, and the State Dept. was also wary. It wasn’t until
3 weeks later on 28 August that it reached Stephen Wise, WJC President in New York, who decided not to make it public. But
this telegram is what the WJC and its acolytes use to say the US and UK governments knew from 1942 that Jews were
The informant in this case is the “mysterious German industrialist” that Bradley Smith wrote about and concluded did not exist. And he didn’t, until 40 years later, in October
1983 when it was claimed in the New York Times, without evidence, that he was Eduard Schulte, a mining company executive who died in 1966 in Switzerland. Twenty years
after his death, the death of his first wife and one of his sons, and most who could contradict the story, Schulte is named
as the ‘informer.’ Even Gerhart Riegner, a life-long WJC executive, refused to confirm Schulte for the NYTimes,
reportedly using as his excuse that “I have not identified the man for 40 years and I see no reason not to
keep the one request he ever made of me.” The mass of biographical and business information written in the Times article
is in no way evidence for the claim—its only purpose in being there is to make it appear to those who don’t
actually read that this is a big story with a lot information behind it.
There isn’t. There is none. But the current World
Jewish Congress leadership thought it worthwhile to bolster their claim of “inside information” about extermination
plans coming directly from Adolf Hitler in 1942 by supplying the name of a real person 40 years after the fact.
a source given for it, the sentence that Schulte was “the first to tell the world about the extermination of Jews”
has been added to Wikipedia pages, such as here, here, here and here. This attempt to fool the public is in itself evidence that there never was an informant, that the story was an invention
of Gerhart Riegner and his WJC confidants.
At the WJC website this article characterizes the worth of the telegram far beyond what it actually was. Note the words “reliable” and “authoritative”
in the first paragraph, neither of which are at all appropriate, since it was hearsay.
The Making of the War
From 1942 to 1944, the World Jewish Congress continued to send messages to the State Department
with information from anonymous sources about atrocities taking place against Jews in German-occupied Europe. Many were
quite similar to the debunked false stories from WWI, and this was noted by State.
A conflict developed between
the State Dept. and the U.S. Treasury Dept. headed by Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who was good friends with the leadership
of the World Jewish Congress. A particular disagreement was over a plan to ship 7000 Romanian Jews to Palestine at a cost
of $1200 per person. Apart from who would pay the money and how, there were British objections to admitting Jews to Palestine.
The State Dept. found it problematic, while Treasury and the World Jewish Congress were pressing for the proposed project,
insisting that the only alternative was death for the Jews at the hands of Hitler. From Wikipedia:
the Treasury Department had granted the World Jewish Congress permission to send the money to Switzerland in July 1943,
the State Department used various excuses, delaying permission until December, a full eight months after the program was
Jewish newspapers like this one from Omaha, Nebraska, played it up big.
Roosevelt was eventually drawn into this State vs. Treasury friction and,
because of his close friendship with Morgenthau, he backed the Treasury Dept. Just as the WJC had been pushing for, Roosevelt
then agreed to assist in the escape of European Jews with the creation of the War Refugee Board in January 1944. He placed in charge Morgenthau, Sec of State Cordell Hull, and Sec of War Henry Stimson.
However, the executive director was Morgenthau’s fair-haired boy John Pehle, with Josiah DuBois as general counsel, making it Morgenthau’s board.
Not only that, but Morgenthau had delegated all of Treasury’s powers
in the areas relevant to the WRB to Harry Dexter White, later exposed as a Soviet agent. Thus, the Board became an instrument of Rabbi Wise and the Zionists, and as such
its main achievement was the booklet, German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Executive Office of the President, Washington, Nov. 1944, hereinafter referred to as the WRB report.
Rudolf Vrba, born Walter Rosenberg
Alfred Wetzler, alias Jozef Lánik
According to revisionist Arthur
R. Butz, this report constituted the birth of the official thesis of exterminations via gas chambers at Auschwitz. Once
Washington committed to the claim that Auschwitz was an extermination camp, the way was cleared for newspapers to carry the
story. It was placed on the front page of the New York Times on Nov. 26, 1944 with some excerpts given. It is described
as two reports, one written by “two young Slovakian Jews” and the other by “a Polish major” whom
had been inmates at Auschwitz from Spring 1942 until Spring 1944 when they escaped. All the essentials of the “Holocaust”
are found in it.
You can read the Vrba-Wetzler Report in full here http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English45.pdf if you want to. But I doubt you will want to. It’s very boring as is often the case with lies. At the end the author
I soon lost my comparatively comfortable job [October 1942?] with the Aufräumungskommando,
and as punishment was transferred to Birkenau, where I spent one and a half years.
I ask, what did a healthy young
man do at Birkenau for a year and a half? It wasn’t known as a work camp. Of course, that assumes that he was actually
there. Examination shows that the information in the report is the sort of thing that could have been built up from intelligence
data. This is exactly what one should expect, as Germany’s enemies had the means of gathering information about German
camps and about events in Europe. The Communist Party, being “the world’s most efficient intelligence organization,”
could transmit any information desired to any destination without needing “escaped inmates” to supply the facts.
WRB report was put into evidence at the International Military Tribunal on Dec. 14, 1945. There was no objection from the
defense and it was accordingly accepted as evidence. However at the later Farben trial, the defense objected to the report,
questioning the “competence and materiality of each and every document in the book” and the objection was sustained
by that court.
It was undoubtedly the determined, even dogged efforts of the World Jewish Congress leaders and
friends in pursuing the extermination thesis that paid off in the end for Jews. From the summer of 1942, “Stephen Wise
had continuously campaigned for the Allied governments to take a public position directly condemning the alleged extermination
of Jews in Europe.” It was J. Breckenridge Long of the State Dept. who most strongly resisted the propaganda. Long
never believed the talk of extermination, and wrote that:
Wise always assumes such a sanctimonious air and pleads
for the ‘intellectuals and brave spirits, refugees from the tortures of the dictators’ or words to that effect.
Of course only an infinitesimal fraction of the immigrants are of that category – and some are certainly German agents.
What we can say for sure is that,
in the end, the World Jewish Congress has prevailed, and that it continues to work tirelessly both for the Zionist cause
of Israel and the welfare of every Jew in the world. What is one hoax more or less to them in the face of such a monumental
Click on this text to examine websites exposing the holocaust lies.
Click on this text to visit the CODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) page.
Click in this text to meet holocaust revisionist Germar Rudolf.
Click on this text to examine the HAAVARA Transfer Agreement (The Transfer Agreement between Germany and German Jews prior
WORLD POPULATION 1938
For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely
regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers.
Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the
accuracy of those numbers.
Here is what the World Alamanacs
of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews.
World Population 1948
In other words, according to the World Almanac
the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government
under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses should have been reflected in the
Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.
suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations made against the Hitler government are confirmed
by the official three-volume report by the International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according
to which 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews. The following article elaborates.
A Factual Appraisal
Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red Cross
The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide
There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during
World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and
objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the
Second World War, Geneva, 1948.
This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two
previous works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps
de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the
Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the
opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality,
and herein lies its great value.
The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees
held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access
to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees
held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international
contact or supervision.
The Red Cross
Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration
camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the
second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who
were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the
occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing
as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).
The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant
to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part
of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to
major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards this concession was
extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants
and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks
for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.
Recipients Were Jews
states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000
parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In
addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald,
Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme,
Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany.
The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews”
(Vol. III, p. 83).
In the course
of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over
twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the
American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted
by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained
that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight
Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.
The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions
which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where
there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III,
p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt
(Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered
by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men
wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing
almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable
impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where
the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation.
The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever
to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation”
by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation,
when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees
remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz
inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.
Evidence Of Genocide
One of the
most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly
occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after
the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed
an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC
on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S.
Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate
was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).
Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as
far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to
the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th,
1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd,
1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring
that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is
important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in
Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not
even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered
rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of
the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable
to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality
rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat
typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps
(Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas
chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not
only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They
had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol.
III, p. 594).
Not All Were Interned
Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population)
deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite
plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain
restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness”
of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann
was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”
In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge,
the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and
at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming
from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944,
when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought
about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and
lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the
free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the
emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war
Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish
Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained
entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who
further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South
American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens.
The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities.
“Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine
were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944
(following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority,
the emigration of Jews continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every
means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating
that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements
will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I,
p . 649).
agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of
the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas
(this includes the above material), it did so accurately.
A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of
the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial
(February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).
The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”.
the quote below by Gerard Menuhin mentioning the "annihilation of millions of disarmed soldiers and innocent civilains"
after the German surrender, it needs to be understood that he was referring to German soldiers and German civillians.
Click on this text to watch Natali Cohen Vaxberg, a radical Israeli political performance artist point out the fact that the
"Holocaust" has been used to justify the Creation of Israel in 1948 and it's immoral army, the brutal and sometimes perverse
persecution of Palestinians without interference from super-powers, and the creation of a nuclear weapons stockpile. BTW:
a dreidel is a four-sided toy top played with during Hannukkah...
Click on this text to view: Cremation Technology vs the Holocaust...
Click on this text to meet HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST ROBERT FARISSON.
Footage allows the viewer to see more
about Professor Robert Faurisson, who is arguably the one key individual in modern revisionism who opened
the door for many more questions to be asked about the historiography, the narrative of what is now called the Holocaust
and open the way for many more of those who would dare to openly question the Holocaust in a serious,
much more objective manner free of dogma or ideology.
Fake shower heads …
One more reason
why the real gas chambers
had to have real shower heads
Like all strong poisons, hydrocyanic acid (HCN)
is very good at being water-soluble –
have been most effectively dispensed dissolved
in boiling water – or, better still, superheated
steam – run through the real shower heads.
Moreover, while a whole can of Zyklon B was
required to kill all insects in a relatively small
fumigation chamber, hardly more than one
scoop of the Zyklon B pellets
been needed to dispatch any number of
humans in a shower room of any size.
Besides, only the lethal agent HCN was
required, Zyklon B as such was unnecessary.
This more costly compound was specifically
developed for use in fumigation chambers,
where, not unlike any other dry cleaning
process, the fumigated clothes
had to be
given back dry to the inmates coming out
of the shower rooms – as the properly run
What's more, HCN
itself – highly flammable
and potentially explosive – was superfluous
to the task, as, in an enclosed
volatile noxious substance – such as cheap
as rubbish ammonia, for example – is just
as deadly, but reasonably safe to handle.
As the Jews themselves very well know,
they murdered numerous Palestinians just
by firing ‘harmless’
tear gas into their houses.
The more one reads
the Holohoax literature
and the closer one looks at those putative
‘gas chambers’ – the less
sense they make.
And the kosher Holo-mongers themselves
are keenly aware of this. And hence, those
once-obligatory Jewish ‘holes in the roof’ or
the later ‘holes in the wall’ – through which
the Zyklon B
was supposedly chucked in –
are hardly ever heard of anymore.
The Jewish Holohoax is getting assimilated.
It's no longer as Jewish and hysterical
it used to be in the 1970s-80s, in the wake
of the October (Yom Kippur) War (1973-4),
when little I$rael is
said to have experienced
some ‘existential angst’ (enter Madison Avenue).
In their latter-day rendition, the physical details
of this ever-apocryphal
Zio narrative get to be
more and more like the Holy Ghost – positively
invisible – and never again
rendered in graven
images. And the ‘venerable’ Anne Frank gets
to be more and more like the Holy Virgin...
(In fact, with HCN
boiling point at 25.6 °C,
Zyklon B couldn't have been used
temperature in fumigation chambers, either –
not without the special pulverizer/blower –
never ever mentioned in the whole
of the Holohoax literature in relation
to the putative gas chambers.)
In order to deprogram yourself, after an entire lifetime of incessant brainwashing by the JEW owned and controlled
media, you can begin almost anywhere... such as learning exactly WHO coined the word "NAZI" - THE Most Misused
Word in Any Language... see here: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id143.html
____________Holocaust Revisionism Articles____________
Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg
. . . by Lasha Darkmoon
Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures,
practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing.
(Left) German defendants at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials, 1946-1949. How many of them had their testicles crushed?
“The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’
obtained by the use of torture.” So begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer.
At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me
some stomach-churning details about testicle crushing. He ends his letter with these words : “This is
what Jewish interrogators did to their German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e.,
to confess to crimes they never committed.”
I was a bit shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a
great deal, nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing
went on at Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been unaware that American Jews
had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers.
Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators,
I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human depravity
to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to have sex
with disinterred corpses.
Yes, so this
is something we ought to bear in mind when watching all those Hollywood movies celebrating the heroic deeds of the Allies
in World War Two and lamenting the horrors of the Holocaust : that Jewish interrogators, working for the Americans, are
known to have beaten, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants before charging them with war crimes at Nuremberg.
Without these confessions, obtained under extreme torture, there is no solid proof that any Jewish Holocaust took place
at all. There is only legend, hearsay and “eyewitness accounts” : like those of Elie Wiesel and his kind—accounts
that have turned out, in retrospect, to be based on pure fantasy, fiction, and grotesque exaggeration.
Proponents of the official storyline say that some of the
strongest evidence that “proves” the Holocaust—i.e. the systematic extermination of 6 million Jews in
gas chambers on the instructions of Hitler—consists of the supposed “confessions” of the German officials
who were put on trial at Nuremberg. What they neglect to tell you is that most of these confessions were obtained under
extreme torture. Indeed, according to Jewish investigator John Sack, torture was often practiced for its own sake, even when there was nothing to find out. It was practiced for sheer pleasure: because it gave the torturers a
‘high’, a feeling of sadistic omnipotence, of orgasmic euphoria.
It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel
Alexander Scotland, who ran the interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture of German POWs occurred during
the war to obtain military intelligence. After the war was over, it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions
of “war crimes”.
POWs reported that the torture techniques included deprivation of sleep, starvation, systematic beatings, ripping hair from
the scalp, menacing with red-hot pokers, threatened use of electrical devices to deliver shocks, and, finally, the worst
torture of all, the slow and systematic mangling of the spermatic cords of the testicles—a procedure that had their
victims thrashing about and screaming like wild animals for hours.
The prosecutors at Nuremberg accused and convicted the Germans of murdering some 4 million
people at Auschwitz. These charges were based largely upon the supposed “confessions” obtained by the torture
of German officers, such as the signed “confession” by Rudolf Höss, the commandant at Auschwitz, giving details of how he had personally supervised the murder of 2.5
In 1989, however, the
Soviet government reduced the claim of the number killed at Auschwitz from 4 million to 1.5 million.
(See picture below). This was later reduced to 1 million.
It became apparent at once that if only 1 million Jews had
died at Auschwitz, as was now officially admitted, it no longer became possible to state that 2.5 million Jews had
been killed there under Höss while he was a commandant there. The “confession” by Höss
that 2.5 million Jews had been killed at Auschwitz under his auspices was therefore worthless. It had been a
confession clearly extracted under torture.
If, moreover, only 1 million Jews perished at Auschwitz instead of the 4 million originally claimed to have
died there, it’s obvious that there has been an overestimate of three million dead Jews. It is no longer possible
to assert that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust. That becomes a mathematical impossibility.
And yet, incredibly, this mathematical impossibility is brazenly asserted
to this day in every mainstream media outlet.
We are all expected to pretend that 6 million Jews
minus 3 million Jews somehow equals 6 million Jews, just as Winston Smith (in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four)
was expected to believe that 2 + 2 = 5. Winston Smith, you will remember, managed to believe this absurdity
in the end, with the help of a little extra tuition he received via the famous “rat torture“.
The startling revelation that
almost all the German defendants at Nuremberg had had their testicles crushed must make us sit up and think. How can testimonies
obtained under testicle crushing be regarded in any way as reliable?
Following reports that defendants were tortured at the Malmedy massacre trial, the US Army formed the “Simpson Commission” to investigate the alleged misconduct. Judge Edward L. Van
Roden was part of this commission. According to Van Roden’s book, American Atrocities in Germany,
out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals” who were investigated by the commission—and
who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal in Dachau after World War II—”137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.”
methods used by the American interrogators included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners and punching them in
the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting them on starvation rations, and subjecting
them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were then presented with prepared statements to sign. Confess
or face more torture!
It emerged that Jewish prosecutors
and interrogators had obtained complete control over the US Military tribunal that was to put German officials on trial
for war crimes. This is seldom mentioned, as to do so is regarded as “anti-Semitic”. To state the unvarnished
truth—that 137 Germans had their testicles mangled at Nuremberg by largely Jewish interrogators in order to obtain
proof for the Holocaust—is regarded as “hate speech”.
Lt. William Perl (pictured above)
was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre.
This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators
at Nuremberg were German or Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’.
There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners.
Perl supervised the torture of the
German defendants. He was an ardent and active Zionist and was assisted by other Jews in his endeavors to extract confessions
by the infliction of maximum pain. Jews specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg included Josef Kirschbaum,
Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz. (See here)
This is what Wikipedia has to say
about the interrogation of Germans at Malmedy:
“The accusations [against the German defendants] were mainly based on the sworn and written statements
provided by the defendants in Schwäbish Hall. To counter the evidence given in the men’s sworn statements and
by prosecution witnesses, the lead defense attorney, Lieutenant Colonel Willis M. Everett tried to show that the statements
had been obtained by inappropriate methods.
Note that exquisite
euphemism: “inappropriate methods”. That’s how respectable, politically correct Americans refer to confessions
obtained under torture. The methods are not described as horrendously cruel. They are not described as morally
indefensible. They are described as “inappropriate”.
25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, made the following observation
in which he claimed that three out of four interrogators at Nuremberg were Jewish:
“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he said.
“You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand
when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish.”
who has made a close study of the Nuremberg trial archives in the original German and knows more about this subject than
anyone else I know is the multilingual American scholar Carlos W. Porter who is fluent in German, French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Having renounced
his American citizenship in 1984, and having then relocated to Belgium with his wife and children, the Holocaust revisionist
author of “Not Guilty at Nuremberg” took the trouble to write to me about the Nuremberg trials in a private communication (July 28, 2015 at
9:55 pm). Porter confirmed what I had always suspected: that most of the American interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jews,
and that torture had been freely practiced against the helpless Germans on trial in order to force them to confess to non-existent
can be absolutely CERTAIN,” Carlos Porter wrote to me, “that nearly ALL the interrogators and interpreters in
ALL the trials were Jewish, because the Americans stamped out the German language from all American schools during WWI,
so German Jewish refugees were almost the only competent people they had. Of course, other “German-Americans”
could not be trusted not to be “Nazis”, so they were stuck with the German Jews.
That there was a great deal of mistreatment and torture in the minor
trials is absolutely certain. I reproduced a couple of accounts of torture at the Dachau trials in “War Crimes Trials
and Other Essays”. But I’m sure it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Minor personnel could be tortured with
impunity, and 99% of them would be afraid even to mention it. It would be hard to get away with torturing somebody like
There’s a lot of literature
on the subject, more all the time. The Brits appear to have been surprisingly enthusiastic torturers, whether Jewish or
crushing, incidentally, is a tried and tested method for obtaining confessions. It was used throughout the Middle Ages and
particularly in France during the French Revolution. That the Jews, a scholarly race noted for their vast erudition and
academic achievements, should have mastered all the techniques of testicle crushing is therefore not surprising. Their talents
for acquiring such outré information must not be underestimated.
Though Perl had lots of German blood on his hands, he was nevertheless allowed by the
Americans to serve as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg War trials. Another Jew of note at the Nuremberg war crimes trials was Richard
W. Sonnenfeldt. He was the chief interpreter for American prosecutors such as Perl. He “interrogated”
some of the most notorious Nazi leaders of World War II and died in 2009, age 86, at his home in Port Washington, N.Y.
The Presiding Judge at Nuremberg was
also—coincidence?—a Jew. His name was A.H. Rosenfeld and he was a colonel in the American
army. Col. Rosenfeld cheerfully admitted to torturing German prisoners of war as a matter of policy. “We couldn’t
have made those birds talk otherwise,” he remarked cynically. “It was a trick, and it worked like a charm.”
In a recent private email to me, in response to some of my queries about torture at Nuremberg, Thomas Goodrich, acclaimed
author of Hellstorm : The Death of Nazi
Germany (1944-1947), mentioned the names of four well-known Jews in the American zone whom he identified as “torturer-inquisitors”
: Harry Thon, William Perl, AH Rosenfeld, and Shlomo Morel.
This last-named individual, Shlomo Morel (pictured right), was
a particularly nasty piece of work whom Goodrich describes as follows:
“a vicious monster who drowned men and women in outdoor latrines,
who made them eat excrement, who personally beat captives to death, and who forced women to kiss and make love with disinterred
(For more grisly details, confirming
all this, see here)
from the killing fields of Germany, where he had taken immense pleasure in dancing over mounds of corpses and shedding rivers
of human blood, this cruel psychopath “lived out his life in comfort and ease in Israel.” Yes,
Israel!—the final bolthole and refuge dump for many a runaway Jew fleeing the long arm of the law, a place
described in a prescient comment by Adolf Hitler as early as 1925 as “a haven for convicted scoundrels
and a university for budding crooks.” (Mein Kampf, chapter 11, excerpt.)
Here now are some grisly details about testicle crushing that the reader may find of some
interest. These distasteful details are given here only because they are relevant to our discussion. If you are of a queasy
disposition and prone to easy vomiting, you are advised to skip the description and stop reading right here. Remember that
all this was done to 137 Germans at Nuremberg in order to extract confessions from them with a view to establishing the
“truth” about the Holocaust. Without all that testicle crushing, the Holocaust might have been much harder to
practice [to obtain castration] in France from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution was to crush the condemned’s
testicles in a vise, which burst them as mush from the scrotum, then crunch the spermatic cords with pliers. The condemned
was turned upside down in order to maximize the blood flow to his brain, after which he was unable to pass out or enter
a state of shock until, perhaps, the last few seconds of his ordeal.
The condemned was sure to vomit repeatedly with violent convulsions, even well after he had voided
the contents of his stomach, but he rarely screamed except for an initial shriek, which immediately silenced, because the
pain overwhelmed his ability to breathe. Most men would hang and thrash wildly during and after the crushing of each testicle,
and their thrashing would renew upon the crushing of each spermatic cord.
This torture method (accompanied by others) was usually reserved for the crime of regicide or attempted
regicide. The condemned was mercifully put to death afterwards, but his torture routinely lasted for the better part of
a day, witnessed by large crowds. It is interesting to note that, whereas most crowds were instructed to jeer, mock, and
ridicule the condemned, and did so even during a disemboweling, and drawing and quartering, most crowds remained silent
and stared with shocked expressions as a castration was carried out in this manner.
Onlookers, male and female, are recorded to have vomited at the sight of the spectacle.
Yes, they certainly knew what they were doing at Nuremberg! They were the experts.
shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious
and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value.
shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial
notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the
committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings
military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.
Documentaries and Videos___
Ordered To Be Silent
the Jews’ version of history
or face gag orders and/or jail time
The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put
in jail for telling the truth.
That makes the idea that you are living in
a free country a willful delusion
from which no competent decisions about anything
may be made.
By John Kaminski
You are no longer allowed to tell a story that is not approved by the Jews, especially if it involves
holy Holocaust defamation. Like a spreading stain of darkness slowly asphyxiating the minds of everyone on Earth,
the monstrous judicial invention that “truth is no defense” has unleashed the worst possible future
upon our lemming-like human species.
People are being snatched off the streets for daring to analyze their country’s provably criminal
history. A woman lampooning a well-known ethnic group is ordered to stay off the Internet for a year. And anyone
who dares speak critically about Jews in public, after first having their character assassinated by a huffy Jewish
spokesperson, is likely to be arrested by a very real thought police.
The stain of darkness has spread much further than you may have thought, but a quick scan of the literature that
has not yet been completely erased by Amazon and the other Jewish mind erasers reveals the public knew more 80
years ago about the problem that has poisoned all life on this planet than we do today.
Those who claim to be involved in the quest for justice
should take this assessment to heart, for the time is running out for humanity’s best qualities as they are steadily
being erased by crazies who know nothing of compassion, humanity or justice.
Revisionists are telling the truth
You know the revisionists are telling the truth, that Holohoax
is the proper term for all this Jewish Holocaust hysteria, because you know by now — if you are even remotely
conscious — that your government is lying about everything it does, so if it says the Holocaust was real,
you’d automatically know it is lying to you . . . again . . . and still.
For instance, our government says it is fighting ISIS in Syria, and then we learn
it is funding ISIS in Syria through such third party operatives as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
This not the first time this has happened. America’s longest war is now Afghanistan, and the same principles
are at work. The U.S. trains and funds the very people it is supposed to be fighting. We trained the mujahadeen
and they became al-Qaeda, paid by our Pentagon to be both friend and foe.
The purpose of all these tragic invasions is the same. In Afghanistan, 17 years of military adventurism and many
thousands of lives were spent to protect the poppy crop, providing fuel for the cycle of depravity that funnels
drugs to the streets, children into prison, and profits from slave labor. In Syria, it’s the oil in the Golan
Heights which Israel is already stealing.
The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth. That makes the idea that
you are living in a free country a willful delusion from which no competent decisions about anything may be made.
thing Jews fear is the truth.
why all these white countries that have been taken over by Jews are slamming people into jail for challenging the
bogus Jewish version of history. Unfortunately — due to Jews owning the majority of media outlets around
the world — the majority of the people in the world tend to believe their well-distributed propaganda.
Like the official story of 9/11 that has long since
fallen apart, or the now-debunked lies about the invasion of Libya, which led to the mass invasion of migrants
in Europe. Jew puppets Hillary and Obama were responsible for the tragic debasement of Europe, which they triggered
by their criminal assassination of Libya and its beloved leader.
One hundred years of evidence clearly reveals that the Jews tell the truth about nothing, but nothing
they have done matches the lies they have told about what they did to the Germans during World War II.
These lies, and the twisted laws they have spawned, are inexorably
strangling every country on Earth, and every person on this planet. These laws prevent the perpetrators from humanity’s
greatest crimes from ever being apprehended, charged and convicted — because it would be anti-Semitic.
No one who knows the real history
of the 20th century dares to travel to Germany — or any European Union nation — anymore. They
will be slammed into prison for harboring unacceptable thoughts.
As we speak Lady Michelle Renouf, attempting to attend the kangaroo court trial of the Schaeffer siblings,
fears suffering the same fate as Monika Schaeffer, the Canadian fiddle player who made a humorous YouTube about
her mother and the Holocaust, went to Germany to visit her brother Alfred, and then was promptly snatched by the
Holohoax police and slammed into prison with no charges for many months.
She and her brother Alfred are in court this week, with their futures not bright and on the line.
This is banana republic garbage. In Germany there is no
liberty or justice for those who understand the worldwide Jewish mind scam. Now that Merkel has set the Africans
free in Germany, one can no longer expect any justice there. Renouf has to skulk around Stuttgart clandestinely
lest she be arrested by Jewish thugs and funneled off to jail for yet another trial.
And now for the first time, this mind virus has spread to England,
where for the first time a man has been jailed for daring to insist on the true facts of history.
Jew cops in England
Jeremy Bedford-Turner —
a.k.a. Jez Turner — was sentenced to 12 months for a 2015 speech he gave criticizing a Jewish organization
known as Shomrim, which is essentially a Jewish police force that works closely with local police.
Prior to Turner’s hasty conviction, Andrew Joyce
Bear in mind that the Crown Prosecution Service has already told Gideon Falter—not
once, but several times—that Jez Turner has committed no crime. If Jez is now found “guilty”
on some trumped-up charge, the Crown Prosecution Service will not only lose all credibility but the world will
see for itself that Jez was right all along when he allegedly said: “All politicians are nothing but a bunch
of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune.”
Writer Robert Henderson wrote,
But even with a jury the odds
were heavily against a not guilty verdict. In the minds of jurors must be the fear of being called a racist, a
fear which has been so successfully inculcated in the general population that it produces an automated reflex
of panic and terror when faced with the possibility of the label being stuck on them. Any juror faced with a case
such as this must have in the back of their minds that to return a not guilty would be to risk being called a racist.
There is also the sheer shock factor of hearing politically incorrect views being unashamedly spoken. As it was
the jury was out for less than two hours and returned a unanimous version of guilty.
Long ago we knew
more than we know now
Before World War II
started, one observer wrote:
press has degenerated under Jewish control and influence into lying propaganda agencies whose chief mission appears
to be to deceive and befuddle the people. In Protocol 12 the Elders of Zion say of the Press:
“Not a single
announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as
all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These
agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
— George Armstrong, The Rothschild Money Trust, 1940, p.47
This Protocol was written before 1905. Seventy-eight years after
this was written, the modern world has much less an idea that Jews control everything, and the laws across Europe
that prevent debunking all these obvious Jewish lies are swallowing up people trying to point out the truth of
history one valiant martyr at a time.
can’t prove 6 million died, but we can prove 273,000 died, not all of them Jews, in the German labor camps.
To think of all the false Jewish stories about fake Holocaust
stories told by pathetic wretches in search of celebrity is to contemplate the spectrum of human psychological
So, the long and
short of it is, you may not even think about a story that affects Jews negatively, because this has been determined
to be a crime against the state.
you can think of other things that the Jews appear to be out to take from you, beyond your ability to think for
John Kaminski is a writer who lives
on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing
a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise.
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
Greetings ladies and gentlemen. A few days ago an article about your humble
author appeared at the Holocaust Controversies blog written by a certain Hans Metzner. Titled Panagiotis Heliotis -
The New Star Shining in the Revisionist Coffin?
This is the last of a series of parts on the same topic. And what
a topic that is! If you have missed the previous parts you can find them here or on our You Tube Channel.
Review of Auschwitz Forensically Examined
Auschwitz—Forensically Examined by Cyrus
Cox summarizes the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp. This article will review some
of the important points mentioned in this book.
The Chemistry of Auschwitz
tests show that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common:
their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue, a compound of cyanide and iron readily discernible by a distinctive deep blue
color. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing facilities
have Prussian Blue staining. On the other hand, nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas
chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
Cyrus Cox writes:
While there is an enormous
presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged homicidal gas chambers there is
no significant presence at all… The simplest explanation for this is that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in
the alleged homicidal gas chambers, plain and simple.
Proponents of the orthodox
Holocaust story, however, cannot concede that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged-homicidal gas chambers
at Auschwitz/Birkenau. They have made the following attempts to explain away the results of forensic tests showing no significant
cyanide residues in the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:
1) The Kraków
Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that claimed not to have understood how it was possible for Prussian
Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen-cyanide gas. The researchers therefore adopted
methods that excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron/cyanide compounds from their analyses. Their assumptions made it practically
impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a
“cyanide residue” of close to zero. The Kraków researchers concluded from their deliberately crippled
analyses that, since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all had similar amounts of cyanide residues, humans were
gassed in the gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
Cox dismisses this Kraków
Institute of Forensic Research report:
The cockeyed blabber about not understanding or about blue wall paint is egregious flimflam at best; in
reality, however, it is a lie to confuse the audience.
2) Dr. James
Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as the laboratory
manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide content in
the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate
deeply into porous materials such as brick and iron.
Dr. Roth later changed this
testimony in a 1999 movie titled Mr. Death produced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:
Cyanide is a surface reaction.
It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns in diameter. Crush this sample
up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go looking for it, you’re going
to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.
Cox writes in regard
to Dr. Roth’s statement in Mr. Death:
That was a lie. To hydrogen-cyanide gas, plaster and mortar are as permeable as a sponge is to water…
Roth knows this, because when he testified under oath at the 1988 Zündel trial, he truthfully said: ‘In porous
materials such as brick and mortar, [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open’…
3) Dr. Richard
Green, who says “I am not embarrassed to call Holocaust denial hate speech,” agrees with Germar Rudolf that the
Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassing with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers
a possible alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers have blue staining. Green writes:
on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible processes could have
taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that had been soaked with aqueous
solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is premature to conclude
that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.
Cox writes concerning
Dr. Green’s statement:
Which absurd auxiliary thesis will come next? Maybe the one by Dr. Richard Green, who seriously proposed
that the cyanide residues in the disinfestation chambers did not stem from fumigations, but were caused by objects leaning
against the wall which had been soaked in a “hydrogen-cyanide solution”? Where then do the cyanide residues close
to the ceiling, in the middle and outside of the wall come from?
biochemist and Auschwitz veteran Dr. Georges Wellers provides another explanation by stating that humans are considerably
more sensitive to hydrogen cyanide than insects. The homicidal gassings at Auschwitz/Birkenau thus were conducted with smaller
amounts of hydrogen cyanide over shorter times. Wellers says the victims would have inhaled almost all of the hydrogen cyanide,
so there presumably was nothing left to react with the masonry.
Cox writes that Wellers’s
explanation overlooks several things:
- Executions in U.S. gas chambers took on average around nine minutes before the victims were dead;
- The Zyklon B used in Auschwitz/Birkenau slowly discharges its toxin over a
period of one to two hours, in contrast to US methods, in which a cyanide “egg” virtually “boils”
in a pot of pure sulfuric acid;
- None of the alleged-homicidal
gas chambers used in Auschwitz/Birkenau had devices such as warm-air blowers to aid evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide.
Such devices were part of the standard equipment of the disinfestation chambers used in that period (the gas chambers are
said to have used precisely the same form of Zyklon B as did the disinfestation chambers);
- The concentration of toxic gas in the chambers would have steadily increased for one or
two hours; therefore, ventilation of the chamber before the complete evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide would have been
of no avail; and
- The victims before dying could have inhaled only an insignificant part of
the hydrogen-cyanide gas that would have been in the homicidal gas chambers.
Cox lists several additional factors indicating
that the alleged-homicidal gas chambers had a significantly higher tendency of forming long-term-stable cyanide residue
than the disinfestation buildings. He concludes:
In the masonry samples of the underground morgue, we should find approximately similar residues as in the
disinfestation chambers, if not even more, provided that the stories told by the witnesses are true.
The Cremations of Auschwitz
Cyrus Cox debunks eyewitness testimony claiming that gigantic flames burst
from the chimneys of the crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau. The construction blueprints show that the flues and the chimney
of the largest crematories in Auschwitz/Birkenau each had a length of about 15 meters. The coke and coal used to fuel the
furnaces burn with a short flame not exceeding half a meter. This fuel could not even have produced flames that protruded
out of the cremation muffles.
Many witnesses also
claim that smoke constantly covered all of Auschwitz/Birkenau. However, none of the aerial photos taken of Birkenau by Allied
reconnaissance planes since late May 1944 shows a column of smoke from any of the crematories. This is so even though these
facilities were allegedly cremating the Jews deported from Hungary at their peak capacity.
The capacity of the Auschwitz/Birkenau
crematories has also been exaggerated by proponents of the official Holocaust story. The crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau
had muffles with doors 1.97 feet in width and height, and were meant to cremate only one corpse at a time without casket.
The full incineration of a single corpse took about an hour. If one considers that the furnace had to be cleaned daily from ash and cinders, a coke-fired crematory could be operated
for a maximum of only about 20 hours per day.
There effectively were never
more than 38 cremation muffles concurrently operating at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Their theoretical maximum daily capacity on
a 20-hour-per-day operational schedule amounts to:
38 muffles x 20 hours x 1 corpse/hour = 760 corpses.
Since single furnaces or even complete crematories had to be shut down on occasion for necessary
repairs, and since the furnaces were often operated by unskilled detainees, one can assume that the actual cremation capacity
at Auschwitz/Birkenau was significantly lower. There was never enough capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau to cremate 4,800 corpses per day as alleged by pro-Holocaust historians.
A set of documents has been
preserved showing the quantities of coke delivered to Auschwitz/Birkenau in the period from February 1942 to October 1943.
These documents show that the new crematories at Birkenau weren’t used as intensively as the old one at the Auschwitz
main camp, and that there was not enough fuel delivered to cremate the additional hundreds of thousands of corpses claimed
to have accrued at Auschwitz/Birkenau. These documents also show that coke deliveries starting in March 1943 approximately
match the numbers of dead reported in the Auschwitz/Birkenau Death Books. 
Cox does acknowledge that
approximately 13,000 corpses were buried in mass graves in Birkenau in 1942 because deaths from a typhus epidemic exceeded
the limited cremation capacity in the camp at the time. Most of these bodies were later exhumed, with many bodies probably
directly burned on pyres. However, Cox says a photograph taken of Birkenau on May 31, 1944 provides irrefutable proof that the alleged incineration
of Hungarian Jews on enormous outdoor pyres has been nothing other than a gigantic propaganda lie.
Carlo Mattogno agrees with
Cox’s analysis. In his book Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Mattogno states in regard to Allied aerial photographs
taken at Birkenau on May 31, 1944:
It is pointed out also that the aerial photographs taken by the Allied military on 31 May 1944, at the
crucial time of presumed extermination, on the day of the arrival at Birkenau of about 15,000 deportees, and after 14 days
of intense arrivals (184,000 deportees, averaging 13,000 per day) and with an extermination toll (according to Pressac’s
hypothesis) of at least 110,000 homicidally gassed, which would have had to average 7,800 per day, every single day for 14
consecutive days; after all of that, the photographs do not show the slightest evidence of this alleged enormous extermination:
No trace of smoke, no trace of pits, crematory or otherwise, burning or not, no sign of dirt extracted from pits, no trace
of wood set aside for use in pits, no sign of vehicles or any other type of activity in the crucial zones of the courtyard
of Crematory V nor in the earth of Bunker 2, nor in Crematories II and III. These photographs constitute irrefutable proof
that the story of extermination of the Hungarian Jews is historically unfounded.
Cox describes the first independent forensic report on Auschwitz:
In 1972, the two architects
Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl, who were involved in the planning and construction of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau,
had to stand trial in Vienna for assisting in mass murder. The Auschwitz Museum had sent the Viennese court the construction
plans of these buildings. Because the judges found themselves incompetent to evaluate these plans, they tasked the Viennese
architect Gerhard Dubin, a certified engineer, to examine these designs to ascertain whether the spaces denoted by the Auschwitz
Museum as execution chambers could have been used as such or could have been restructured for such use. Dubin answered “No”
to both questions in his expert report. This was one of the reasons why both defendants were ultimately acquitted by the
jury. Subsequently, an unknown person removed Dubin’s embarrassing (for the orthodoxy) expert report from the trial
records, because today it is not to be found there. This destruction of evidence is not only grossly anti-scientific, it
is also a criminal act.
The Holocaust orthodoxy
continues to suppress evidence to this day. Publicly disputing the official Holocaust narrative is a crime in some 19 countries.
Moreover, in Germany it is prohibited by threat of punishment to file a motion with the court to admit evidence seeking to
prove that revisionist statements are correct. The reason given is that such motions constitute “Holocaust denial”
and would therefore be a criminal act during a public trial. Accordingly, several defense lawyers have been sentenced simply
because they filed such a motion.
writings cannot even be read in court in modern-day Germany. Cox writes:
In order to keep the public in the dark about the fact that the
defendants are being sent to the dungeon for entirely harmless and scientifically well-based statements, their writings
for which they are on trial are moreover not read out in the courtroom, which would normally be obligatory, but the trial
participants—judges, prosecution, defense—are ordered to read the material by themselves at home.
Ever since the introduction of these measures, silence has been once more every citizen’s primary
duty in German courtrooms. Shut up, and don’t you dare protest!
Auschwitz—Forensically Examined provides an excellent introduction to the forensic evidence proving
that Auschwitz/Birkenau was not an extermination camp. Readers who are interested in a more detailed analysis of the forensic
evidence can read books written by Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno to gain additional insights.
Cyrus Cox states the primary reason for knowing that there were no homicidal
gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau: “While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the
disinfestation chambers, in the alleged homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all.” Pro-Holocaust historians have yet to provide a credible explanation why no significant presence of cyanide residue has
been found in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes: “…for any alleged human gas chamber
found in a German World War II labour camp let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’t
 Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and
Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw,
Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.
 Cox, Cyrus, Auschwitz—Forensically Examined, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2019, pp. 41, 53.
 Rudolf, Germar. op. cit., pp. 368-369.
 Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 40.
 Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News”
Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.
 https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s
Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, David John Cawdell Irving v. (1) Penguin Books Limited,
(2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf.
 Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 42.
 Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 54.
 Ibid., pp. 67, 70-71.
 Mattogno, Carlo. Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Newport Beach, Cal.: The Institute for Historical Review, 1994,
 Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., pp. 21-22.
 Kollerstrom, Nicholas. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers,
2015, p. 70.
DEBUNKING THE MYTH
OF DR. MENGELE
By Mike King
Of the many sub-fables
spun off of the grand fable of “Auschwitz ™,” the most shocking
and enduring is the myth of that evil, sadistic, mass-murdering monster whose name ranks behind only
those of Adolf Hitler and SS Chief Heinrich Himmler on the all-time
scary dude list. The notorious camp doctor known for conducting live invasive experiments on Jewish inmates
has long since been immortalized
in articles, books and films. You know the name – none other than the big bad Dr.
Josef Mengele (cue dramatic piano music) -- aka "The Angel of Death ™."
(cue even more
dramatic piano music)
There is, however, just a wee little problem
with this official narrative of the big bad Mengele.. To put it bluntly, just like those long-since
discredited tales of shrunken heads, lamp shades & soap made from dead Jews, “zee gas chambers
and babies being tossed into open fire-pits
– the Myth of Mengele is, well, bullshit from start to finish!
Mengele-Mania has generated lots of shekels for lots of writers and
The Three Biggest Lies About Dr. Mengele
1. He condemned inmates who could not work to death in the gas chambers
He conducted cruel experiments with twins.
He conducted other cruel medical experiments on random
Let us debunk:
Mengele and the Gas Chambers
This one is easy because we absolutely know, for certain, that there were no gas chambers
at Bullschwitz or any other internment camp! If you’re new to “Holocaust Denial ™,”
here are a pair of powerful pieces (to read later) which will – unless you are in deep
denial – forever dispel the silly notion of “zee gas chambers ™ ” – (here & here). Hence, how could Dr. Mengele have condemned people to die in "gas chambers ™" that never even existed?
chambers" lie has been debunked so thoroughly that Amazon had to be pressured by "the usual
suspects" into banning many books about the Holohoax and World War II.
2. Mengele and Experiments on Twins
If the alleged
experiments Mengele is alleged to have performed with twins were so cruel and deadly (like sewing
twin babies together in an attempt to artificially create conjoined “Siamese Twins!” ---
ha ha ha ha ha -- yeah, right!), then how were most of the twins enrolled in his research able to survive
the war and then, in 1984, form an association which still lobbies for their interests? The organization / museum
is named “CANDLES” (Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiment Survivors).
In fact, they, their descendants and their advocates are still raking in shekels off of Mengele's wrongly
tarnished name (cha ching!). (here)
Now just focus on
the name of that organization for a bit and ask yourself: How the frickety-frack can “deadly lab
any so many "survivors?" The evidence – or
lack thereof – is very clear: Mengele did not commit any crimes on the Jewish twins. An anthropologist
in addition to being a physician, Mengele's research was limited to behavioral / observational studies
only – nothing surgical.
1. Twins Jiri and Josef Fiser were studied by
Mengele, and "survived"
to tell tales about it. // 2 & 3: Twin Eva Kor gives speeches on how she "survived"
3. Mengele Randomly Conducted Other Cruel Experiments
The “eyewitness” testimony
as to the medically senseless and cruel experiments supposedly performed by Mengele (changing eye
colors by dye injections, removing healthy teeth just for the fun of it, transplanting organs to random
places in the body -- ha ha ha ha ha --yeah,
right!) ring as absurd and untrue as stories of shrunken heads and lamp shades. But because
the “survivors ™ ”
have been sainted, none dare to question them.
Interestingly, the “victims” of these monstrous experiments, never
showed any signs of these cruel procedures. There was never even the slightest bit of evidence to support
the claims of these “survivors” -- no documents, no autopsies. Nothing!
also studied dwarfism. Above, the 7 dwarfs of the Ovitz family. // 2. Tales of Mad Mengele torturing
Jews by ripping out healthy teeth just for his amusement are totally without basis, and not even worth
Who Really was Josef Mengele?
Before the war, the brilliant Mengele, after studying philosophy,
went on to earn doctorates in anthropology and medicine. His main career focus was as a researcher
– hence, the observation of twins, dwarfs and others at Auschwitz. During the war, Mengele was awarded
the Iron Cross 2nd Class, and then an Iron Cross 1st Class for his bravery in rescuing two
men from a burning tank. After being seriously wounded in action on the eastern front in 1942, he was
declared unfit for active service and then transferred to Auschwitz where he served as a doctor and
the kicker. Dr. Mengele, as one of the lead physicians in a camp afflicted from time to time with outbreaks
of typhus, worked tirelessly to save lives – not take them! The Zyklon B “gas”
was a pesticide used to kill lice, not people. Furthermore, under the jurisdiction of Mengele, and other
camp doctors, an estimated 3000 Jewish babies were born and cared for at Auschwitz. True story, boys and girls.
Read "The Auschwitz Baby Boom" (here)
1. Drawing depicts Dr. Eduard
Wirths -- an Auschwitz doctor and colleague of Mengele's -- as a valiant knight waging
battle against deadly typhus-carrying lice. // 2. SS officers at Auschwitz. From left to right: Richard
Baer, Josef Mengele, Josef Kramer, Rudolf Höss // 3. Many of the Jewish babies born at Auschwitz "survived" and lived
four years after the end of the war, Mengele, a true-believing SS man, escaped to Argentina -- where he lived
for about 10 years while working as a carpenter. He then fled to Paraguay in 1959 and Brazil in 1960. Now a most-wanted
fugitive, Mengele was being hunted by the United States, West Germany, Israel, and independently by
the hideous “Nazi hunter,” Simon Wiesenthal of "babies in the bon-fire"
fame. He eluded capture in spite of extradition requests by the West German government and covert operations
by Israel’s Mossad.
Headline: New York Times (May 11, 1985)
Nations Joining to Hunt Mengele
By Ralph Blumenthal (cough cough)
In time, the
hate-filled psychopaths came to believe their own dirty lies about noble Dr. Mengele -- Image 1: NY
Slimes front page story // Image 2: Lots of shekels were offered to locate Dr. Mengele.
Unbeknown to his hunters at the time -- the good doctor, philosopher, anthropologist,
decorated war hero, gentleman, scholar, humanitarian and carpenter died in 1979, at the age of 67,
after suffering a stroke while swimming off the coast in Brazil. (Or did Mossad finally get him "on the down
low?") He was buried under a fake name. According to his only child, his son, Rolf, Dr. Mengele
maintained his innocence until the end. We totally believe him. And, given all the other lies
we’ve been fed about everything else related to “The Bad War” -- you should too.
How Danuta Czech Invented 100,000 Gassing Victims
An Analysis of the Auschwitz
Chronicle – Part 1: 1942
Click on this text to examine THE HOLOCAUST LIES.
to the Treblinka “Gas Chambers”
“CONFESSIONS” UNDER TORTURE
The Allies used extremely brutal torture against their German prisoners, not just during the
war, but afterward, to force them to provide fraudulent confessions to crimes they never committed—all to get convictions
at war crime trials. The subject is well known to Revisionists, but the facts have been suppressed by the mainstream for
more than 65 years and few people outside of this circle are aware of it.
The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to
the American Press on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions. In the
prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated, officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were soaked
in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay prostrate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy
Trials of private soldiers, the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded
of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Paiper, the
Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organisation”. S.S. General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator
of the concentration camp system, had his face smeared with faeces and was subsequently beaten until he supplied his confession.
In dealing with these cases, Senator McCarthy told the Press: “I
have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically
tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions,
they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval
of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions.
If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us
severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.” The methods of intimidation described
were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities
on the basis of their admissions.
The American Judge
Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate
the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington
Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949.
The methods he described were: “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning
matches driven under the prisoners finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation
rations.” Van Roden explained: “The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had
first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months … The investigators would put a black hood
over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses
… All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This
was standard operating procedure with our American investigators.”
The American investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution in the trials) were: Lt.-Col.
Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his assistants, Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt. Robert E. Byrne, Lt.
William R. Perl, Mr. Morris Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A. H.
Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of these people were “biased
on racial grounds” in the words of Justice Wenersturm – that is, were Jewish, and therefore should never have
been involved in any such investigation. Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination
of the Jews were extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive evidence for the
Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others, and the illusion is maintained that the Trials were both impartial and
impeccably fair. When General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor, was asked where he had obtained the figure of the Six
Million, he replied that it was based on the confession of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his case
is examined below. But as far as such “confessions” in general are concerned, we can do no better than quote
the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van Roden: “Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks
ready to mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors.”
of widespread torture at the postwar American-run “war crimes” trials at Dachau leaked out, resulting in so
many protests that a formal investigation was eventually carried out. A US Army Commission of inquiry consisting of Pennsylvania
Judge Edward van Roden and Texas Supreme Court Judge Gordon Simpson officially confirmed the charges of gross abuse. German
defendants, they found, were routinely tortured at Dachau with savage beatings, burning matches under fingernails, kicking
of testicles, months of solitary confinement, and threats of family reprisals. Low ranking prisoners were assured that their
“confessions” would be used only against their former superiors in the dock. Later, though, these hapless men
found their own “confessions” used against them when they were tried in turn. High ranking defendants were cynically
assured that by “voluntarily” accepting all responsibility themselves they would thereby protect their former
subordinates from prosecution.
One Dachau trial court
reporter was so outraged at what was happening there in the name of justice that he quit his job. He testified to a US Senate
subcommittee that the “most brutal” interrogators had been three German-born Jews. Although operating procedures
at the Dachau trials were significantly worse than those used at Nuremberg, they give some idea of the spirit of the “justice”
imposed on the vanquished Germans.
Virtually all of
the US investigators who brought cases before American military courts at Dachau were “Jewish refugees from Germany”
who “hated the Germans,” recalled Joseph Halow, a US Army court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947. “Many
of the investigators gave vent to their hated by attempting to force confessions from the Germans by treating them brutally,”
including “severe beatings.”
of Gustav Petrat, a German who had served as a guard at the Mauthausen, was not unusual. After repeated brutal beatings
by US authorities, he broke down and signed a perjured statement. He was also whipped and threatened with immediate shooting.
Petrat was prevented from securing exonerating evidence, and even potential defense witnesses were beaten and threatened
to keep them from testifying. After a farcical trial by a US military court at Dachau, Petrat was sentenced to death and
hanged in late 1948. He was 24 years old.
James J. Weingartner, the author of A Peculiar Crusade: Willis
M. Everett and the Malmedy Massacre, wrote the story of the Dachau proceedings from information provided by Everett’s
family and gleaned from his letters and diary. According to Weingartner, shortly before the proceedings were to begin, defense
attorney Lt. Col. Everett interviewed a few of the 73 accused with the help of an interpreter. Although the accused were
being held in solitary confinement and had not had the opportunity to consult with each other, most of them told identical
stories of misconduct by their Jewish interrogators.
Ferencz, Jewish lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947: “We did not have a regular
courtroom where to call witnesses and question them, with a secretary present and someone who did the cross-examination
or that would guarantee their rights. We collected statements from witnesses that we considered favorable and they would
write an affidavit. And then they had to swear it in front of an officer. If it was from a hostile witness we would interrogate
him privately to see if we could determine the truth. And when we reached the point where we felt we had ascertained the
truth, we asked him to write in his own hand and sign it; then usually brought in an officer to witness that.”
– USHMM interview 1994
Washington Post: Giving Hitler Hell (21 July 2005)
Jewish Intelligence Officer Arnold Weiss: “How did you do it?” I ask Weiss. “The
kapos,” he explains, “that’s where we got the idea. We had seen what the DPs (displaced persons) did to
the kapos, and we realized they could do us a favor. We studied up a little on military law, and there was nothing on the
books preventing us from delivering suspects for additional debriefing to the DPs,” Weiss recalls. He says he’s
not sure where the idea originated, who first put it into motion, or how widespread it was. “Whoever first came up
with this, I honestly don’t know. I don’t think they’d own up to it anyway.”
While it was perfectly legal under military law to hand over suspects for further questioning
to DPs, says Benjamin Ferencz, who was a lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947, knowingly
delivering suspects for execution was not. And of course the DPs were not interested in extracting information.
Benjamin Ferencz: “I once saw DPs (displaced persons) beat
an SS man and then strap him to the steel gurney of a crematorium. They slid him in the oven, turned on the heat and took
him back out. Beat him again, and put him back in until he was burnt alive. I did nothing to stop it. I suppose I could
have brandished my weapon or shot in the air, but I was not inclined to do so. Does that make me an accomplice to murder?”
Lt. William Perl was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America
in 1940. He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre. This was because he could speak fluent
German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before
WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized
in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. Perl was an active Zionist who had worked to get European Jews into
Palestine illegally before he came to America. Perl was also a good friend and associate of the Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky,
founder of the murderous Irgun terrorist organization in Israel. Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. Other
Jews on the interrogation staff specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg included Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and
British Postwar Torture Centers
Col. Robin Stephens (pictured left) was in charge of a sadistic
torture program during and after WWII, still largely covered up by the British government. Much of the fabricated “evidence”
obtained under duress was used as a pretext to convict National Socialist leaders for war crimes.
The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German
officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than
1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of
German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
Cruel Britannia: A Secret History of Torture by Ian Cobain
The secrets of the London Cage
How Britain tortured Nazi PoWs
Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre
The interrogation camp that turned prisoners into living skeletons
The postwar photographs that British authorities tried to keep hidden
Tortured Confessions: How the Allies extracted confessions out of captured
German soldiers after WWII
Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg
How the Allied Victors of WWII tortured and killed their German prisoners
How Jews tortured innocent Germans to make Holocaust Evidence
The Holocaust legend is built on “confessions” obtained VIA TORTURE; Jewish interrogators beat, tortured,
and crushed the testicles of German defendants at war crimes trials
Untrue Confessions: Fabricated Testimony & Circumstantially Prudent Concessions
Hellstorm — The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 By Thomas Goodrich
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST
ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. The
following is the response I give, to those who will listen:
Excuse me, but
I don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?
fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer and historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,
who was often called “The Conscience of the 20th Century”; who served eight long years in
the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in the year 2000 entitled “Together
For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66 million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians
(and it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans in WWII),
were kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman
ways in the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik
“Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps.
I freely acknowledge the fact that on
February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust of the non-military city of Dresden, more
than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million helpless people, which produced a firestorm
that was called a “Single Column of Flame”, where the temperature in the center of the city
reached 1600 degrees centigrade, and in which approximately 500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded
soldiers, random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered by concussion
and fire in a single night.
I absolutely recognize that more people
died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than the estimated total of 246,000 helpless people who
died in two other quintessential Holocausts, the senseless, wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary
atomic attacks upon the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
openly avow the virtually forgotten Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the Wilhelm Gustloff,
an unarmed German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the freezing waters of the Baltic Sea,
13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945, as it carried, besides it’s men and crew,
some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian
refugees – mostly women and children – who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the
advance of the Red Army, and where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster
in maritime history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic.
I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total of 271,304
people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps, combined,
by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus epidemics and starvation
caused by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply routes and centers all over Germany
that made it impossible to transport food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and civilians
I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German
post-war, non-combatants who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care,
and purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under the supervision
of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor concentration camp this side of
modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder of untold hundreds
of thousands, if not millions, of women and children as the communist Red Army of the Soviets also took
its “revenge” upon the defeated Germans.
I do not deny the Holocaust
suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed USS Liberty surveillance ship, which was deliberately
attacked by air and sea, with machine gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967,
killing 34 and wounding 174, in an attempted false flag operation which was intended to sink the ship, and murder
all aboard, in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel,
and was only foiled by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator to
successfully get off a call for help.
And I do not deny the Holocaust
of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as a result of the false flag attack on the World Trade
Center in New York which was engineered and perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their
pre-planned “Clash of Civilizations” which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn
enemies, the Christians, and the Muslims, to forget their historical religious commonalities, and annihilate
one another in the yet to be the greatest Holocaust in history – a third world war – as the
“Chosen Ones” sit on the sidelines… and direct… and watch… and profit…
while gleefully rubbing their hands as even more untold millions of innocents die.
I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002,
where Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in a cruel, indiscriminate,
blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and which lasted for
13 days, flattening large areas of the town, and killing unknown hundreds of innocent men, women, and
children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier, similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila
refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known that at least 800 Palestinians were killed.
Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon
the sovereign nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression
that, from 2003 to the present, has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and
children, and brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s ongoing war
of terror, which they have the unmitigated gall to present to the world as a war “ON” terror…
for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.
I’m at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators of
the above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either directly, or indirectly
committing numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over many millenia, even since ancient
Biblical times – from the slaughter of the Midianites to the African slave trade – a number
of which being the basis of, and celebrated during various Jewish holidays. And though I do not particularly
describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either.
I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all that ANY Jews at
all – much less “six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings, or as
a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated against Jews by Germany’s
Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence or “proof” that is not merely
made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war anti-German propaganda… because none, from either
then or now, actually exists.
So, if you want to talk
about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal “Holocaust”,
and not only the ones from the past, but one that is happening right NOW, in the present, all you need to do
is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your collectively ignorant rear ends, and look into
the current goings-on in Gaza, The West Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist,
Zionist, Talmudic Jews are feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or
Jew, who stands in their way in their quest to build their racist, supremacist, “Kingdom of the
World”… a.k.a., Eretz Israel.
if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to the all too common
view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters is one that is purported to have been suffered
by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier” is one of the
most laughable, and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet seen anywhere…
even as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous
charge you make.
THE OPEN LETTER SPIELBERG COULDN’T REPLY TO
BY R. Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce, a noted Jewish holocaust researcher:
“Dear Mr. Spielberg, I wish
your honesty to be equal to your talent. I saw you on TV in France. You declared that you would pour out Shoah (holocaust)
propaganda in German schools. I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years of study of the historical problem of the holocaust,
to call your attention to the facts.
Jewish Prof. Roger Dommergue
Facts are very stubborn and as no one can contradict
them, zealots have been forced to make disgusting politicians enact Orwellian laws which forbid to mention anything concerning
the dogma of the ‘six-million-gas-chambers’.
Professor Faurisson, who has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been massacred.
These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude. No
Sir, you will not find a single witness who saw six million Jews slaughtered. You will not find one witness of gas chambers
to exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria. The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an arithmetic
and technical nonsense.
As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business is disgusting, debasing: it is
a disgraceful shame. No people in history have ever been wailing about its losses 50 – 70 years after a war, even
its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and pump
up so much money everywhere.
We know that 6 million is a gross exaggeration and that the gas chambers are a technical
impossibility. (Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact, 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation.
Many others died but as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933.
We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all
over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a
quite famous book was published but is ignored (Other Losses, James Bacque).
We know that all German towns of more than 100,000 people
have been destroyed during the last war, with women and children: yet silence about this real holocaust. If we consider
the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge
amount of anti-Semitism the explosion of which will be unique in history. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour:
all the rest is suicide.
Orwellian laws for ‘crime of thought’ cannot prevent anti-Semitism to explode:
only our behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on and it will increase out of
reasonable proportions. We must, at least, try to avoid such blunders as the one you intend to perform in Germany and which
would be appalling.
POINT 1: Do we know, in the course of History,
of any ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had suffered many
less losses than it thought? Would the discovery of such good piece of news, not be rewarded, and celebrated? Would he be
overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions
not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
POINT 2: Have the living
corpses which can be seen in such films as Night and Fog (by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with
gassing? Are they not instead of the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German towns containing
more than 100,000 people, bringing a real holocaust to hundreds of thousands of women and children who are never mentioned?
POINT 3: Where would have been the 4 million Jews (if we consider
that 2 million were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand
people and that except in Auschwitz, there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers?
POINT 4: Are
witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the only way to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant
Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend. What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is officially
recognised that there were no gas chambers situated in that camp either?
POINT 5: 130
kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of just one corpse. We are told that the Germans cremated 1,300 corpses a
day. The USAAF took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there
not a single heap of the essential coal? Why not a single column of smoke?
POINT 6: Why
do media continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never-ending whining and moaning?
Why are the Jewish lobby chasing, nonagenarians who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty,
from the joblessness of 6 million people, who, back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent
POINT 7: Why does the American Jewish Year Book,
issue 43, page 666, inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
POINT 8: How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria, when
any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyper flammable?
POINT 9: Why
are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the holocaust? A scientific dialogue, a court-ordered
appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal the truth for
POINT 10: How could Zyclon-B gas 1,000 people at one time, when
it is well known that American gas chambers made for just one person, are of an unheard of complexity and cost? Why, at
the trial of the Degesh, which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible
POINT 11: Why did Leuchter, who was in charge
of the maintenance of the US gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian
and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are
those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy
of the report is not taken.
POINT 12: Why was, for the first
time in history, the doctor’s degree of Mr Roques, on the Gerstein report cancelled? And still, this report was not
accepted at the Nuremberg trial!
POINT 13: Why did
Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, to which no revisionist was invited, (state) that there was
not the slightest trace of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?
POINT 14: Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as expressed
in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann (Germany must perish), by sterilisation of German men? It is undoubtedly a small detail?
POINT 15: How could Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since
1920, be used in the concentration camps for other purposes than delousing and protection against typhus?
POINT 16: Why do they harp on about the six-million and never mention 80 million non-Jews
exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovich,
Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews?
POINT 17: Why,
during the Zundel trial in Canada, did the famous pro-holocaust Jews disgrace themselves by talking of ‘poetic licence’
in their holocaust assertions, and who never returned when summoned to do so by the judges?
Ernst Zündel, historian, holocaust fraud investigator
POINT 18: Why the Fabius-Gayssot law; the ludicrous
fable of one illness stricken man dragging along 200,000,000 corpses?
POINT 19: Is
it not the supreme proof of the fake? There is no need of Stalinist-Orwellian laws imposing prison sentences because of
one’s beliefs (thought crime of 1984) as stated by M. Toubon, before he became a Minister of Justice in France, to
set up the truth.
This law is anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, against the rights
of men. Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with
an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to
grant it but refused it almost immediately.
The forum did take place at the Lugarno
television studios. It was a complete success for the revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media,
at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger only when authorised by the Jewish lobby to do so.
POINT 20: Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust
is an arithmetic and technical impossibility, he is dismissed? This, for the first time in history, sets up the insane concept
of religious historical dogma, which in case of non-perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition
of a secular state.
POINT 21: Why did the ‘Express’,
a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed
after the war, and that all that concerns it, is false?
POINT 22: There
was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given bread
to six million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man and
the planet and which is called democracy by semantic mystification. Only two parties are left: the totalitarian Judeopathy,
exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for the non-Jews not yet poisoned by Capitalist-Marxist Jewish influence.”
NOTE: For reasons of space this open letter to movie producer Steven
Spielberg has been abridged from the French language original penned by R. Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce, a Jew who
strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy.
Is There Life After Persecution?
The Botched Execution of Fred Leuchter
Presented at the Eleventh IHR Conference, October 1992.
by Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
Many of you, I am sure, know who I am, where I've been, and what I've done. Today I'm here to tell you
what has happened to me since I addressed the Tenth International Revisionist Conference in Washington, DC, in October
One of my jobs as an engineer of execution technology
has been to "post mortem" executions from a technical standpoint, that is, to determine if anything
went wrong and, if so, to determine just how the execution was botched. This normally entails reviewing eyewitness
accounts of how the executees were tortured, mutilated, or otherwise dehumanized in society's name.
I will do that here today, except that, in this case, it is myself that I post
mortem -- and the cadaver isn't dead! Much to the dismay of my executioners, the execution was so badly botched
that I am able to stand here before you to speak the truth, and to tell the world that it is not myself, but the
Holocaust story that is dead. I repeat for the record: I was condemned for maintaining that there were no execution
gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Dachau, Mauthausen, or Hartheim Castle. There's no proof for the
charge, only innuendo, lies, and half-truths. Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zündel and others said this first.
They, too, live as victims of botched executions, but nevertheless free to speak the truth in a strong and growing
voice that repeats: No gas chambers, no gas chambers, no damn gas chambers!
This address, then, is not a post mortem on my cadaver but rather a post mortem by my cadaver.
As you know, I was sent to Poland in 1988 by and for Mr. Ernst Zündel to investigate
the alleged execution gas chamber facilities at the three concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek.
I was chosen for this task from a field of experts numbering one, and recommended by those states in the USA where
lethal gas chambers are used to execute convicted criminals. My forensic analysis and subsequent report prove
beyond any shadow of a doubt that there were no gas execution facilities operated by the Nazis at these sites.
I also entered these findings (which are also detailed in my published report) into the court record in sworn
testimony in Toronto as a court-qualified expert.
I was somewhat naive at the time, I was not aware that by so testifying I was offending the organized world Jewish
community. By providing final, definitive proof that there were no execution gas chamber utilized for genocidal
purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps, I established the simple fact that the Holocaust story is not
true. What I did not know was that anyone expressing such beliefs is guilty of a capital crime: that of thinking
and telling the unspeakable truth about the greatest lie of the age.
I would have to pay for this crime. While I innocently told the truth in Toronto, plans were made, and
subsequently implemented, for a major effort to destroy me. If I could be destroyed and discredited -- so the
reasoning went -- no one would accept my professional findings, no matter how truthful.
1988, when I testified in the second Zündel trial in Toronto about my inspection of the alleged gas chambers in Poland,
my life has been turned upside down.
I have been
vilified both privately and publicly in all forms of the media. My clients have been cajoled and threatened into
not dealing with me. High-level law enforcement officials, acting for personal reasons, have lied about me and
have prevented clients from dealing with me. My person and reputation have been defiled by lies and innuendo. My
family and I have been repeatedly threatened.
campaign to punish me and suppress the truth about the gas chambers, have been several Jewish organizations, which
have publicly vowed to silence me by destroying my ability to make a living.
At the forefront of this effort has been Beate Klarsfeld of the Paris-based Klarsfeld
Foundation. In the United States, the campaign has been orchestrated through the US-based "Holocaust Survivors and
Friends in Pursuit of Justice." Associated with these two organizations have been the Anti-Defamation League
of the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Defense League.
Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
At Klarsfeld's initiative,
these groups first carried out an extensive one year investigation. After they were unable to turn up any impropriety
or wrongdoing on my part, they began to threaten prison wardens with political consequences if they dealt with
me. This first came to light when the ABC television news program, "Prime Time," decided to do a network
television piece on myself and my work. This involved filming at various prisons. Prison wardens advised the "Prime
Time" personnel of the threats and problems that resulted from my presence at the prisons for the filming.
ABC news was told not to air the program. It refused to succumb to the pressure, and consequently suffered vilification
by the organizations involved.
To sum up here, this campaign
has consisted of the following:
- Threats against prison
officials who dealt with me.
- False and slanderous vilification through private channels,
as well as publicly in newspapers and magazines.
- Legislation to prevent me from working at
- Criminal prosecution for working at my profession.
- Lies by public officials spread both officially and privately.
- Restriction of my personal
freedom and right to travel by effecting my illegal arrest and imprisonment in England, from where I was finally
- Interference with my right as an American citizen to help and protection
from the US State Department, which refused to assist me during my illegal imprisonment in England.
As a result of this campaign, my livelihood has been destroyed, and my career has been ruined. All this for telling
the truth under oath.
The organizations cited above
also interfered with the execution in Illinois of a certain Mr. Walker by threatening to pass legislation to prevent
that state from allowing me to complete an ongoing contract. As a result, Director McGinnis ultimately yielded
to this pressure and proceeded with the execution using equipment known to be defective. Under pressure from these
groups, and through the efforts of Alabama Deputy Attorney General, Ed Carnes, the State of Alabama did not purchase
a new electric chair. Carnes wrote a lying memorandum to all Departments of Corrections around the United States
claiming that I was dangerous and held unorthodox views on execution. He caused the State to breach its contract.
According to his office, this means I support only humane and painless executions. Carnes actually lied to me to
get me to testify that a prior execution was humane.
a direct result of interference by these groups, at least one man was tortured to death in Virginia. Purchasing
agents and wardens have been mendaciously told that my equipment failed during an execution, which is not true.
It has never failed. Delaware Deputy Attorney General Silverman breached my contract, which was already underway,
because I wrote the Zündel trial Leuchter Report. This contract was for maintenance on their lethal injection
machine and gallows, previously fabricated by me, and for training of their execution personnel. Delaware has
refused to pay me for the work I completed, and has instructed me to keep the control module of their lethal injection
machine. However, the protocol I wrote for execution by hanging was submitted by them and approved by the court
system. In Massachusetts, legislation specifically designed to put me out of business has been filed for four
Finally, and also at the insistence of these
same Jewish groups, a spurious criminal complaint was filed against me in the Massachusetts court system with
the intent of destroying my reputation by putting me in prison for three months.
I was charged with practicing as an engineer without a license. In point of fact, a license
is not required in Massachusetts, or any other state, unless the engineer is involved in construction of buildings,
and is certifying compliance with specifications. There is also a statutory exemption for engineers who do not
deal with the general public.
As confirmation of
the spurious nature of this charge, it should be pointed out there are more than fifty thousand practicing engineers
in Massachusetts, of whom only five thousand are licensed. Although the state's licensing law has been in effect
since 1940, there has been no record of any prosecution for this offense.
The charge was improperly brought. Nevertheless, if it had been successful, and I had been convicted, I would have
been imprisoned for three months.
state Engineering Board, under pressure from Klarsfeld and her "Holocaust Survivors and Friends in Pursuit
of Justice," filed this criminal complaint in Middlesex County. The name of the complainant was denied me,
and was not made available until the matter was brought before the court. Before the complaint was issued, and
several times thereafter, I was given the chance to recant in return for non-issuance or dismissal of the complaint.
I also would have been obliged to give up my profession, in order to discredit my Report. I refused,
and responded to the Board's threat with a denial that any law had been violated. The original clerk magistrate
who issued the complaint apologized for bowing to Jewish pressure in prosecuting me under a statute that was being
mis-applied. A representative of the ADL tried to force her testimony on the hearing, but was denied access because
she had no evidence to offer that was pertinent to the matter. The District Court judge, in an excellent imitation
of Pontius Pilate, summarily dismissed our motions for dismissal, allowed my court-appointed attorney to withdraw,
and instructed Kirk Lyons, Director of the Cause Foundation and my out-of-state attorney, to re-file our motions
for dismissal, because they all had merit. After it became clear that there would be no justice for us in the Malden
District Court, we moved the case to Superior Court for a jury trial.
With this charge hanging over my head, it was impossible for me to consult, supply equipment, or even act as an
expert witness in American courts, as I had often done.
district attorney's office, under heavy pressure from various Jewish organizations, selected its best prosecuting
attorney to handle my case. In the belief that he would be the person most likely to bring about a conviction,
he was pulled from a murder trial. In June, just prior to the trial, our motions for dismissal were heard. The
judge, also under heavy pressure from Jewish groups, told the district attorney that this case was not properly
a criminal matter, and strongly suggested that the case be resolved short of a trial. With the ever-present possibility
of conviction and jail (faced by most political prisoners) we negotiated a settlement.
A very special consent agreement was signed [on June 11, 1991] that made legal
history in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The agreement was not a promise by the defendant to the court, as
is normally the case, but an agreement between the State Engineering Board and myself. The board which, on two
previous occasions, had refused to accept my application for registration because they do not register people who
practice my discipline, was required to become a party to the agreement. [For more on this agreement, see the
IHR Newsletter, July-August 1991, p. 3.]
consent agreement requires the board to accept my application and process it with "due diligence." Until
the application is approved, or until two years are up, I have agreed not to use the title "engineer"
or issue an engineering opinion in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This is, in effect, a temporary gag order
imposed to satisfy the interested Jewish groups.
removing the case from consideration by criminal courts, the possibility of my imprisonment has been eliminated.
If the Engineering Board fails to process and issue a license to me within a reasonable period, and in due course,
the matter should then move to the civil courts. Attorney Lyons is presently preparing the necessary application.
However, a new problem has arisen. All applications must be accompanied by the recommendations of three state-licensed
engineers, but none is willing to risk the wrath of the Jews in my behalf.
The de facto gag order, imposed by the settlement, applies only within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
and I am free to pursue my profession anywhere else.
of the execution equipment in the United States is either worn out, obsolete, or improperly fabricated, and is
in need of repair or replacement. I am the only person who does this work, and states are being denied the right to deal
with me. Although wardens and commissioners are afraid to even speak with me, they often do so anyway through
intermediaries. One state has a leaking gas chamber, but will use it, endangering the lives of guards and witnesses,
rather than risk discovery in dealing with me. How many more inmates will be tortured, or lives lost, through
the callous interference of these Jewish groups?
to the successful conspiracy of these Jewish groups, I am completely out of business, unable to find work to feed
my family. In spite of everything, though, I am still here, and I am still telling the truth. Furthermore, I intend
to continue to tell the truth. If the organized Jewish community wants to stop me, it will have to try much harder.
Moreover, attempts to discredit the Leuchter Report have failed, most
notably with Pressac's inept analysis. Since the release of the Leuchter Report [in 1988], independent
evidence has shown that the six million death figure has been grossly exaggerated, and an investigation by the
Polish state forensic institute [among others] has corroborated that no gas was utilized in the alleged execution
chambers at Auschwitz.
In the spring of 1991, David Irving asked me if I would consider a speaking engagement
in England later that year. I said that I would, and I was advised in mid-summer that this would take place during
the second week of November.
announced the speech sometime later. This apparently enraged Jewish groups in London which protested to UK Home
Secretary Mr. Kenneth Baker in an effort to prevent me from traveling to London. This is a clear infringement
of the rights of British people to hear me speak. This certainly also curtails my right to travel to England as
any other American citizen.
As a result of pressure
by these Jewish groups, Mr. Baker apparently promised to take action. The Jewish Chronicle, a London weekly
paper, reported in its issue of October 4, 1991, that Home Secretary Baker had banned my travel to the United Kingdom.
This was the only mention of the ban in the British media, and was not a particularly reliable source.
A week or so later, my father, Fred A. Leuchter, Sr., received a letter, ostensibly
from the Immigration and Naturalization Department of Her Majesty's government, informing him that, by direction
of the Home Secretary, he was not permitted to travel to the United Kingdom. My father communicated this letter
Because my father had no such travel plans,
my first assumption was that this letter was meant for me. However, a closer reading of it suggested that it might be
a fraud. The signatory, Mr. "G.P.J. Catt," had no title, and part of the date was written by hand. Certainly,
the Home Secretary and Her Majesty's Immigration Office would not be so sloppy and unbusinesslike as to send off
an amateurishly prepared letter to the wrong person. My address is publicly known, and is easy to ascertain.
I turned the questionable document over to my attorney, Kirk Lyons, to authenticate.
He, in turn, formally protested the letter to the UK Consulates in both Houston and Boston. In each case, the Consulate
advised him that his protest was unfounded because there was no ban on travel to the UK by me (or my father, for
that matter). He was informed that the letter must be fraudulent, and that it did not prohibit my travel to Britain
in any way. Lyons was also informed that all Home Office documents must contain a reference number, which this
did not. Based on all this, I confirmed my travel plans to London.
Because I also had also arranged to visit Germany, I combined that trip with my visit to London. Accordingly,
my wife Carol and I left for Germany on November 2, 1991. We planned to drive to Calais and take the ferry to
Dover from there on or about November 11, 1991. We also planned to return to Germany on or about November 15, immediately
following my scheduled speech in London. Because our visit in Germany would be very hectic, we intended to arrive
in England several days prior to my speech, giving us a few days to relax and see some of that country.
As planned, we arrived in Dover on the ferry from Calais late on November 11,
and spent the night in Dover. The next morning we drove to London, where we met with Irving. We then left to see
the country, leisurely driving south to Salisbury to see Stonehenge. We returned to London by way of Wimbledon
on November 15.
On Friday evening, November 15,
we arrived at the Town Hall in Chelsea where I was to give my speech. After Irving opened the program, Dr. Robert
Faurisson spoke. I was then called to the podium, and began my presentation. At approximately 9:15 p.m., some five
minutes into my speech, I was interrupted by Irving, who told me that a "gentleman" wished to speak to me
in the anteroom to the stage. I did not know it then, but I would remain in illegal police custody, without interruption,
until I was expelled from England, and would not see my host, Dr. Faurisson, or the audience again.
In the anteroom I was greeted by Chief Inspector Philip Selwood and three metro police
officers. I was asked to identify myself, which I did by presenting my passport (which Selwood kept) and my driver's
license (which he returned). I was told that two male technicians with the Thames television news team had quietly
spoken with him outside, and had insisted (as citizens) that I be arrested as an illegal alien because I had sneaked
into the country contrary to a ban by the Home Secretary. I responded by pointing out that my passport was properly
stamped, and that, as the two British Consulates in the United States had indicated, there was no such ban.
I further informed Selwood that if it was indeed determined that was in the country
illegally, I would leave immediately. I told him that I had no wish to stay where I was not wanted, and that did
not want to violate the law. Selwood told me that Thames television was trying to make news instead of reporting
it, and that my cooperation would be very much appreciated. He asked me to accompany him to the Chelsea police
station, without talking to the media, whilst he made an investigation. If I refused, I would be arrested on suspicion
of illegal entry. I agreed. After he spirited me out of the building and into an unmarked van, away we went. Selwood
was also afraid of violent Jews, who might attempt to break up the speech, and that was the reason for the presence
of himself and his large contingent of men. I asked him to bring my wife, who was at the back of the hall. He
stopped the van, ordered his men to take me to the station, and personally returned to collect my wife. I arrived
at the station, and he soon followed with Carol. We were placed in a visitors' room.
Selwood advised me that I was not under arrest, and that if the Home Office determined
that I was in the country illegally I would be permitted to leave. I was told that I was free to call the American consul,
if I wished. I did not.
At this point I asked to
leave. I was informed that I would have to wait for my status to be determined, because it would be necessary to
escort me out of the country if I was there illegally. Selwood further told me that persons who were in the country
illegally must be permitted to leave, if they so wished, providing they had the means. (In fact, we had ferry
tickets.) Chief Inspector Selwood and the other police personnel were cordial and accommodating, providing us with
a toilet and refreshment. We advised the police that Carol was diabetic. After first introducing us to his second-incommand,
and leaving instructions as to our treatment, Selwood left before midnight.
At approximately 12:05 a.m., early Saturday morning, November 16, the Deputy Chief Inspector
received a call, apparently from the Home Office. We could not hear very much, but we did hear him say that we
should leave by way of Dover. A few minutes later, shortly before 12:15 a.m., he again received a call, to which
he replied "Yes sir." He then came to speak to me. "I'm sorry," he said. "I have been
ordered to arrest you." He informed me of my rights, and told me that I could talk with the US Consul, or
the Duty Solicitor (Public Defender), or both. When I asked if it had been determined that I was in the country
illegally, he said that he did not know for sure. I then asked to leave, and he told me that this was not possible.
At this point I asked to speak with the US Consul, and was told that this would be arranged. I was then searched,
booked, and locked in a detention room with someone else, also under arrest.
About an hour later I was removed from the detention room, and told that the American Consulate
was on the telephone. I spoke with Under Consul Christopher Randall who informed me that the Consular Corps was
not there to help US citizens. He totally refused to help. I asked to talk with the Duty Solicitor, and was told
he would be called. I was taken to a cell (instead of a detention room) for lock-up. When I asked why I was being
moved to a cell, I was told that the other occupant of the detention room was there for assault, and that I was
being moved for my own protection.
I now found myself in
an isolation cell with one other occupant who turned out to be there for theft. Because I make execution equipment
(and criminals know this), I should never have been put in a cell with others. To do so might put my life in danger.
Moreover, the cell was freezing, and I had no coat. The other inmate had a blanket
and mattress. In an effort to keep warm, I wrapped my arms around myself, but this didn't work. I was unable to
Some time later I was let out to accept a
phone call from the Duty solicitor, who told me he was unable to help because I had not committed a crime. He
told me that I should call my Consul, who ought to be able to help. When I told him that my consul had refused
to help, he urged me to call back and insist, because he was obliged by law to help. I was returned to my cell.
At approximately 3:00 a.m., I was removed from my cell for interrogation by two Immigration
Department personnel. I was taken to an interrogation room with recording equipment, and advised that my statement
would be taped. I was also advised that I did not have to make a statement if I chose not to. I agreed to speak
with them, but they first had to give me time to warm up so that my teeth would stop chattering and I would be
able to speak normally. I gave them the same information that I had given hours earlier to Chief Inspector Selwood.
I affirmed that I was a legal entrant, and once again requested permission to leave. I was refused. I was told
that I should call the American Consul and/or the Duty Solicitor. I was also informed that charges might be brought.
At this point I was served with Immigration form IS 151-A. I was also told that I would not be allowed to leave
by way of Dover, but would instead be sent out though Heathrow airport (where they were from), and that my wife
and our rental car would have to stay behind.
I asked about
my wife, concerned that she had not eaten in over twelve hours, which could be a problem because of her diabetes.
I was told that they would make a decision later about my legal status, and that in the meantime I would have
to remain in the cold cell. I asked to be allowed to warm up, and to see my wife. They agreed to this. Carol had
also asked to see me.
I met with Carol. After talking
with her, I once again asked to talk with my Consul. The Consulate official again gave me a hard time, but after
I told him of my discussion with the Duty Solicitor he said he would at least inquire into the matter. The guard rushed
me to complete my phone conversation. Carol subsequently found out that the Under Consul had inquired late that
morning. Carol had been removed while I was on the telephone, and I was rushed back to my cell. I froze again,
but at about 4:30 a.m. I was given a blanket.
day shift personnel who arrived at about seven o'clock proved more difficult to deal with. At 7:00 a.m., the other
inmates were awakened to be taken to court. They were given coffee; I was not. My cellmate asked the guard to
give me some coffee, which he did. By 7:45 a.m., all the inmates were gone, and new inmates began to arrive.
I repeatedly asked about my wife to make sure that she was well. I inquired
at 7:00, 8:00, 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00, and 1:00 o'clock, but no one would tell me how she was. Later I found
out that just one officer had checked on her. She likewise had been asking about me, and was told nothing. At
noon I was given a breakfast that consisted of cold eggs, sausage, and toast left over from hours earlier. It was
inedible. It certainly would have made my ulcer worse. Carol had been given nothing to eat, even though she had
been required to stay there by the Immigration officers who knew of her medical problem.
At about 1:20 p.m., I was again taken from my cell, this time to see Mr. Phillips of the
Immigration Department. He met with Carol and me together. Phillips told us that it had been determined that I was in
the country illegally, because I had entered in violation of the ban by the Home Secretary. I was told that I
would be held until I was deported.
that he could not understand why I had been arrested and imprisoned after I had asked on three occasions to leave.
Once again I asked to leave, but Mr. Phillips told me that this was now not possible because I had been formally
arrested. This should not have happened, he said, but, because it did, I would now have to be deported. Carol
asked how it was possible for me to be in the country illegally if I had entered legally at Dover and had a valid
passport stamp. Phillips replied that I was not actually in the country illegally, but that an official determination
had been made that I was, and that was the law. I asked why those immigration officials who had interviewed me
had made this determination, and Phillips responded that they had not. He further said that the "decision
has been made very high up in the Home Office," higher than he would ever reach in his career. He added that
I could legally be held for up to five days after my arrest, even though I wanted (and should have been allowed)
to leave earlier.
Phillips also told us that the Immigration
Department had contacted French immigration about my possible deportation to France, but that I had been refused
entry there. I responded by commenting that this is not surprising, because no country would want a deportee unless
it is one of its own citizens. Phillips agreed.
said that his next step would be to ask Belgium, and, if I was refused there, Germany. He did not expect Belgium
to accept, but if Germany did, I would be sent on the Hamburg Ferry that ran only twice a week, the next time
being on Tuesday [three days hence]. If I were to go this way, I would have to remain incarcerated until that time.
However, I was asked, in view of my desire to leave, would I consider going to the United
States? Phillips informed me that if I officially told him that I wished to return to the United States, he could
not stop me, and would put me on a flight that very evening. I then formally asked to be returned to the United
States, and Phillips said that he would begin making the necessary arrangements. We would have to leave the rental
car in England and make some arrangement for its return to Germany (other than by our driving it). Furthermore,
we would have to forego our remaining commitments in Germany because time would not permit our return.
After taking our airline tickets, he contacted Lufthansa to reschedule our flight.
The only available fight that day was at 3:30 p.m., which was too soon for us to get to the airport. He returned
our tickets, and promised to make arrangements at the UK government's expense. He booked us on a British Airways
flight to New York (not Boston) that departed at 6:30 p.m. We were escorted in two cars. Phillips' car went first,
and we followed in another police car, under guard. We stopped for our luggage at our car which was parked behind
Selfridge's [in London], at a parking meter, and proceeded to the airport in rush-hour traffic. If we did not
make it on time, they would have to return me to my cell.
a stop at the Immigration office to pick up the necessary forms, we arrived at the airport, passed through security,
and reached the gate just as the plane was being loaded. The police officer had left us at the entrance to the
terminal. After returning my passport (which noted my detention on form IS 151 A), Mr. Phillips watched us enplane. The
people at the ticket counter had been told that I was being deported, as were the gate attendants.
We took our seats, flew to New York, and arrived at about 9:45 p.m. We had to purchase
air tickets to Boston at our own expense. After barely making this flight, we arrived in Boston at approximately
11:45 p.m., exhausted and hungry.
In summary, I
was detained and held in custody for some twenty one and three-quarters hours, fourteen of them in an unheated
cell. I was given a breakfast at noon, and was given one cup of coffee only at my cellmate's insistence. I was
given no water, and there was none in the cell. My ulcer did not fare well under these circumstances, particularly
because of my anxious concern for Carol.
For her part, Carol
fared even less well that I did. After my arrest, she was given no food or water, even though she was not free
to leave, and the police knew that she was a diabetic. After my arrest, she was allowed to see me only once. By
the time we left, we were both cold and ill. The conduct of both Chief Inspector Selwood and Mr. Phillips, as
well as that of the police personnel on the evening shift, was exemplary. By contrast, the conduct of the day shift
personnel was poor and careless.
During the time
that I was being held, Dr. Robert Faurisson went to the US Embassy in London to see if he could obtain help for
me. He was informed that neither I, nor any other American, had been arrested that evening. That the US Embassy would
lie about the illegal arrest and imprisonment of an American citizen is inexcusable. Faurisson also went to the
police station where I was being held. He was told there I had been arrested and was being held in a cell in the
station, but that I was not permitted any visitors. The police later told Faurisson that I had been deported on
Saturday at 6:30 p.m.
As shown by the statements of the two
British consular officials in the United States, and the fact that my name was not on any list and was legally
permitted to enter at Dover, it is clear that no order barring me from entering the UK was ever officially given.
It is likewise clear that the difficulty started only when the Thames television
people lied about me to Chief Inspector Selwood, apparently in order to make a "better" news story.
It is also clear that the Home Secretary (or someone acting for him) illegally
ordered my arrest, imprisonment and deportation, knowing full well that I had entered the country legally and should
have been left alone or, if later determined to be there illegally, at least permitted to leave. This plain violation
of international law by the Home Secretary's Office was undoubtedly done to please the complaining Jewish groups
which bear the ultimate responsibility.
to uphold one of the prime responsibilities of the Consular Corps -- that is, to protect the rights of Americans
abroad -- the United States Embassy in London, and Under Consul Christopher Randall in particular, clearly failed
in their responsibility to me as an American citizen, as well as their responsibility to the nation as a whole.
It is a shameful disgrace that the British duty solicitor and UK Immigration Officer Phillips cared more for my rights
than my own embassy.
A formal protest to State Department,
and requests for help from our Senators and Representatives, have resulted in nothing but lip service.
my clients -- the state governments -- are still intimidated by my Jewish persecutors. This continues to deprive
me of my income, and it is not at all clear whether this will ever end.
I have been unable to apply for my state engineering license because no engineers have been willing to
sign papers recommending me (which is a requirement), out of fear of retaliation. Without some official change
in my status, such as a license, even the friendly state governments are afraid to deal with me. The major lawsuit
we had planned against my persecutors is stalled, perhaps permanently, because of a lack of funds.
And, although my findings will ultimately be accepted by all, I still have
no contracts, have been unable to find work and have no income. It does not seem that this will improve in the near
From The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1992 (Vol. 12,
No. 4), pages 429-444.
Censored History: Britain put Jews in Concentration Camp During WWII
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was a letter from Britain’s
Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Walter Rothschild to be read before the Zionist Federation of Great Britain
It announced British support for Jewish immigration into the Palestinian Mandate. The Zionist Federation
had promised the British government they could mobilize Hollywood and other assets to push America into WWI on
the side of the Axis. America entered WWI on April 6, 1917. The Balfour Declaration was made on November 2, 1917.
It was widely viewed in Europe as a thank you for American Jewish support for America’s entry into WWI.
Declaration was considered a major step towards the creation of the Jewish state of Israel.
The fallout however, was not good for European
Jews. Germany had been a safe haven for Jews for hundreds of years. Jews were thriving so much so, that the average
Jewish income was significantly higher than that of the average German. Germans felt the Jewish community as a
whole had betrayed them. German Jews quickly became stigmatized as disloyal, draft dodgers, war profiteers, and
If that wasn’t enough, European Jews soon felt the sting of betrayal from Britain. In the 1930′s
the German government offered to move European Jews to the Palestinian Mandate. The National Socialist regime
encouraged Jews to obtain Palestinian passports and argued that Jews would be much happier living in a country of
their own in the Middle East. The German government promised the Arabs in the Palestinian Mandate free Volkwagon trucks
and construction supplies to pacify them. Ideological Zionists living in the Mandate embraced the idea and some
even openly supported the National Socialist regime.
Britain immediately capped the number of Jews who could move to the Palestinian Mandate to
only 15,000 a year, so they would not change the balance of power.
In 1940, the National Socialist regime sent the first wave of Jews to
the Palestinian Mandate. The first convoy was three ships full of Jews from Prague, Danzig, Vienna, and Tulcea,
Romania. The British immediately blockaded the ports and declared that the Jews were illegal immigrants. The Jews
were all arrested by the British army and placed in quickly erected concentration camps. Once WWII started many
Jews tried to reach the territory to avoid being sent to Nazi run concentration camps. Britain captured tens of
thousands and imprisoned them in concentration camps in the Palestinian Mandate, Cyprus, and Mauritius. The British
concentration camps looked the same as the dreaded camps run by Germany, Croatia, and Romania. When inmates arrived
at the British camps they were forced to strip naked and then sprayed with DDT.
In 1944, the government of Hungary collapsed. The arrow cross party seized control of Hungary
to keep the Hungarian army fighting on the Eastern front. To pay for the Hungarian army, Jewish owned property
in Hungary was seized. The National Socialist regime made another major attempt to send Jews to the Palestinian
Mandate. They had Turkish cooperation to transport Jews to the territory by train. One train was even filled up
with Hungarian Jews and ready to leave, but the British said the Hungarian Jews would be refused. The passengers
were ordered to switch trains to be sent to concentration camps in Poland. At that time Britain knew full well
that the IRC was the sole provider of food and supplies to the camps and it was only a matter of time until access
would be cut off due to the advancing red army.
What is even more shocking is that after the Allies and the IRC began liberating
the concentration camps, Britain continued to imprison Jewish refugees who tried to enter the Palestinian Mandate.
Many survived WWII in concentration camps, only to be imprisoned by the British.
The main British concentration
camp was in Atlit, north of Haifa. Many Jews were imprisoned in Atlit before being transported to Cyprus or Mauritius.
Over 70,000 Jews were imprisoned there between 1940 and 1945. The camp was shut down when it was attacked by Zionist
guerrillas in 1945. Yitzhak Rabin allegedly masterminded the operation, but he did not lead it.
It took a very violent guerrilla war and
major acts of terrorism to convince the British to give up the Palestinian Mandate after WWII was over.
by Jason Swartz
____________________AN ACTUAL PURPOSEFUL HOLOCAUST____________________________
The Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945
In 1945 and 1946 London Satanist Zionist Committee
of 300 presented German dead bodies as Jewish dead bodies - dead body plays are typical for Satanist behavior:
Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945 (part 4)
Part 4: German bodies shown
as Jewish bodies for Hitchcock's films about German concentration camps: wrong bodies from Rhine meadow camps, wrong lorries,
showers and crematories etc.
Hitchcock, portrait 1956, he likes betraying and laughing
Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished
Jewish detainees with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15,
1945 ; other web sites state that this photo would be from Dachau.
Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass
grave 01, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are
NO remnants of earth on the bodies
Part 4: German bodies shown as Jewish bodies for Hitchcock's films about German concentration
camps: wrong bodies from Rhine meadow camps, wrong lorries, showers and crematories etc.
Master liar Hitchcock was in Germany together with mass murderer and Zionist Eisenhower.
Mass murderer Eisenhower had organized the Rhine meadow camps with 5 million German prisoners of war, and within 6 months
1 million died (750,000 on the "American" side and 250,000 on the French side). Since 1942 Zionists made propaganda
on and on in the whole world that Jews would be "gassed" in German concentration camps. Well, but all this was
a big lie because the German concentration camps were under control of the Red Cross AND of the Zionists themselves who
could move freely everywhere! But Eisenhower wanted a "confirmation" for the propaganda. Eisenhower gave the order
to Hitchcock: Make some films thus people will believe that the rumors about the German mass murder against the Jews are
right. They should believe it really. This was simple: Hitchcock was filming in the Rhine meadow camps and simply said in
the films that the emaciated Germans and the German bodies would be Jewish bodies - and the film was ready. They were also
driving piles of German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps through Germany showing the bodies in German concentration camps
stating that these would be Jewish bodies. And these lies were established by force of arms and were spread in the whole
Well, the principle faults one can detect these
lies of Eisenhower and Hitchcock are the following ones:
-- German dead bodies from the Rhine meadow camps - when they
wear clothes - are NOT wearing the German striped "zebra" prison uniforms but are mostly wearing remnants of the
German gray soldier uniforms of the German army "Wehrmacht"
-- German bodies have no tattooed number of detainees
-- and there are no remnants of earth on the bodies and thus these bodies never were excavated before but these bodies
are "fresh" bodies.
Journalists were never watching precisely and
since 1945 they mean that the NS regime had murdered millions of Jews. But it was just the other way round: Criminal allied
murdered 1 million German soldiers in the Rhine meadow camps and then were presenting the dead bodies as Jewish dead bodies.
And for making the lie even more perfect the allies also invented epidemics in the German concentration camps having been
the "cause" for the bodies.
1: Rhine meadow camps with emaciated German soldiers and with piles of German bodies
The Rhine meadow camps of 1945 with 5 million detained German soldiers in Germany were deliberately concealed.
Eisenhower - a hater of the Germans - had not enough having murdered in Dresden over 230,000 Germans. In the Rhine meadow
camps Eisenhower let die deliberately 750,000 German soldiers, and 250,000 more were murdered by hunger in the French zone
which was installed in July 1945 taking over Eisenhower's death camps there. But this was not published because there were
no newspapers in Germany in 1945 and the Red Cross had no good press spokesman as it seems. Even "U.S." president
Truman was not informed what was going on in Germany in the "American" zone but the Morgenthau plan was fulfilled
killing as many Germans as possible after the war - and the Rhine meadow camps were only the beginning because the deliberately
installed starvation which was installed by Zionist Eisenhower was killing even 5 million more Germans in remaining Germany
from 1945 to 1950. During 1945 "American" soldiers had a paradise life and were making holidays in criminal Nazi
Switzerland and Swiss press - whereas the International Red Cross has it's seat in Switzerland in Geneva - is concealing
until today (2013) the mass murder in the Rhine meadow camps under mass murderer Eisenhower...
Point 2: Hitchcock presenting emaciated German soldiers and piles with German bodies as Jewish
Eisenhower was a racist Zionist and Bible Jehova racist.
His bosses were the Zionists Baruch (financier and stock exchange guru) and Zionist Morgenthau. Morgenthau wanted to have
all Germans killed having a powerless or even a Germany without population. Zionist Eisenhower wanted to kill as many Germans
as possible, and he had a "friend" with him, film maker Hitchcock. There should be films made supporting the claim
"Germans" had gassed "6 million Jews". Now German dead bodies in the Rhine meadow camps were filmed
and the German dead bodies were driven around in whole Germany and they were presented in the German concentration camps
claiming that the dead bodies would be dead Jews.
Analysis of Hitchcock's films: some fakes and some proofs
Controlling the Hitchcock films one can detect the fake, see the following
details. German helmets had an ear protection and a neck protection, but "American" helmets were round like a circle
without protection of ear and neck.
|Different forms of helmets of the Wehrmacht and the "U.S." Army |
Helmets of the Wehrmacht with the protection of ears and neck, example during Barbarossa campaign 
German helmets of the Wehrmacht with the protection of ears and neck, example of a hand grenade course 
"American" soldiers with round "American" helmets and with rows of German bodies in a
Rhine meadow camp 
Eisenhower and Hitchcock were bringing the fake to a head. German bodies were partly
driven around in whole Germany, were shown on the trailers or piled on the ground and presented to the population as "Jewish
bodies". But the mass fraud was clear
"American" soldiers with round "American" helmets piling German bodies on
a trailer in a Rhine meadow camp 
-- there were no tattooed numbers
of detainees on the bodies
-- when the bodies had clothes on then these were German uniforms and not striped zebra
uniforms from German concentration camps which had Jewish detainees
-- and the bodies could not be digged out either
because the bodies were so clean and new that there were no rests of earth on them.
"American" occupation forces claimed that Auschwitz had been the "center" of the murder of the Jews
whereas NEVER ANY "American" soldier was in Auschwitz in the concentration camp. Well, Eisenhower just copied
the cc of Auschwitz in a Rhine meadow camp and thus Hitchcock made his Auschwitz films. But all these fakes can be detected
easily with the "American" helmets.
Examples of fakes from Bergen Belsen
Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees
with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 ; other web sites
state that this photo would be from Dachau.
|Photos from the faked cc film by Hitchcock: "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary
On The Nazi Holocaust" (53min.1sec.) |
When the links are not working, go to http://www.youtube.com looking for the title "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust", so you get the
actual links of the film. Always look for the film of 53 min. 1 sec.
Let's see the fakes about Bergen-Belsen
<There were more than
200 children under 12 years old still alive in Belsen camp.>
Hitchcock made some little mistakes: In the film he is saying himself that the prisoners are
"soldiers". And there are also women greeting the detainees -
thus German women greeting German soldiers - and these are not women greeting Jews. And there are allied lorries with a five
pointed star of the "American" army on the hood. And all detainees have dark gray clothes.
Thus these are GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR, above all those with a white "turban" on the head. These are white massive head
bandages after having suffered head injuries in the fight. In Bergen Belsen there were allegedly dead
bodies by typhus and these bodies are said having been buried only 9 days after the liberation,
and these dead bodies of typhus only partly show irregular dark spots, but often no one. In the film
is also a medical doctor presented without medical white coat calling himself
Mr. Little (Mr. Klein). And at the end the English are claiming that there had been typhus in Bergen Belsen concentration
camp installing a warning sign in English "Typhus" and the film is inventing
a laboratory of "London students". Hitchcock is inventing that typhus came from getting
too less soup and too less water - word by word. Well, when there had been a typhus epidemic in Bergen Belsen then the German
camp leadership had installed an own warning sign - in German - and in coordination with the Red Cross!
According to the Baron of the Lies Hitchcock even Jewish children survived Bergen-Belsen in
a good estate of health, even a new born baby.:
Bergen-Belsen (22min.37sek.) 
New born baby
in Bergen-Belsen (22min.5sek.) 
Some children were born in the camp.
camp (11min.1sek.) 
Here the mass murderer Eisenhower and film maker Hitchcock were organizing a huge fraud and calumny
"American" lorries with a five pointed star on the hood coming with German prisoners of war
(1min. 49sec.) 
Thus this is not a German lorry but an "American" or British lorry. And here do not come Jews but here
come German detainees being greeted by German women and children.
Such people are NOT Jewish detainees but GERMAN soldiers in gray coats and with head injuries with
white head bandages. Here they are standing allegedly around a "water lorry". (2min. 9sec.) 
This is NO Jew but this is a German soldier in his gray army uniform of the Wehrmacht. He is eating
bread at a barbed wire fence (2min. 23sec.) 
German soldiers under the
allied command had to "arrange" themselves on a meadow.
Women sector, women meadow (4min. 22sec.) 
Also these women are NOT wearing the striped German zebra uniform
for detainees in German ccs as Jewish detainees had, but these are German assistant staff members from the camp being forced
under allied command to arrange on the meadow. Additionally there were no "women's meadows" in German concentrations
camps but there were "women's camps". "Women's meadows" only existed under mass murderer Eisenhower from
1945 to 1946...
German prisoners of war in a queue (11min. 6sec.), many have white bandages
on their head because of head injuries . Jews in German concentration camps had NO head bandages for sure.
Thus here are NO Jews but
GERMAN soldiers - in the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen under allied English administration.
pipes and in the back ground a car of the Red Cross can be seen (11min. 50sec.) 
A car of the Red Cross is closed (18min. 37sec.) 
pictures with a car from the Red Cross are shown then it can be admitted that the camp was well managed and there were no
or hardly any epidemics, but all cases of illnesses were brought to hospitals as long it was possible.
supply in the camp (11min. 33sec.) 
When films are claiming that German administration had blocked the water supply leaving Jewish detainees
suffering without water then this is just a normal propaganda fake to destroy the reputation of the Germans.
Water supply in the camp 03 with washing possibility (11min. 39sec.) 
there cannot be seen any striped Jewish zebra detainee's uniform in this film, but these detainees are women from SS.
Here is a
German prisoner of war topless in summer 1945 searching clothes on the ground, and in the background there is a dead German
detainee in a gray uniform (3min. 7sec.) 
This scenery cannot be from
April 145 because April 1945 was cold and wet with much rain and even snow. Nobody was walking topless in April 1945. But
liar Hitchcock claims this would be a Jewish detainee during the liberation of the camp in April 1945...
The ground is full of German bodies or full of helpless dying German prisoners of war in gray uniforms starving
and suffering in their own excrements (3min. 23sec.) 
There CANNOT BE
SEEN ANY striped zebra uniform of German concentration camps. All clothes come from dead German soldiers. These are NO Jews
Male emaciated dead bodies without clothes and without spots and without tattooed numbers of detainees
(4min. 54sec.) .
These dead bodies are German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps.
dead body with big breast and with irregular spots on her body with an open mouth (4min. 8sec.) 
The irregular spots are never explained.
Some bodies have spots, others not. Nothing is clear about it. Thus there is the suspicion that the spots are painted.
of Bergen-Belsen: SS has to dig out a mass grave and allies are helping with a bulldozer (6min. 48sec.) 
When a mass grave is digged out
with sun shine and dry earth this scenery cannot be from cold and wet April 1945 but this scene was taken more at the end
of May or in June 1945.
Faked board in English with the claim "Typhus" at the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen
AFTER the liberation (18min. 4sec.) 
When an "occupation power" claims that there had been an epidemic in a German concentration
camp this is mostly a lie. In the case of Bergen-Belsen a board in English was installed. But when Bergen-Belsen had had
typhus then the German administration had installed an own board with a warning in German. Thus the English occupation power
has invented this epidemic justifying the masses of dead bodies which were brought to the camp later. Inventing an epidemic
concealing the own crimes is a standard maneuver of the Anglo-Saxon psychological warfare...
Bergen-Belsen: task force with an alleged action on April 24, 1945, dead bodies arriving in a trailer
(12min. 33sec.) 
German bodies from a Rhine meadow camp were brought to Bergen-Belsen in a trailer and German SS men have to push
Bergen-Belsen, hips of dead bodies on a trailer (12min. 54sec.) 
The dead bodies
on the trailer have NO tattooed numbers of detainees and the bodies are absolutely clean and have NO remnants of earth or
other contamination by earth. Thus these are German bodies from Rhine meadow camps. But the British occupation power with
it's weapons is ordering here in Bergen-Belsen that these would be Jews...
Corpse pit in the region of Bergen-Belsen (13min. 30sec.) 
The bodies in the mass grave have - when they have
clothes yet - no striped German detainee's uniform as Jews had in German concentration camps but they mostly have remnants
of German gray Wehrmacht uniforms. And not one single body has a detainee's number which would have been shown at once
by the journalists. Thus these bodies are German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps being buried here in Bergen-Belsen.
Public with emotions watching the lorry full of emaciated dead bodies coming probably from the Rhine
meadow camps (12min. 48sec.) 
British occupation power organized a public
booing SS men. By force of arms SS men were ordered to believe that these bodies would be Jewish bodies. And the local German
public cannot detect the lie that these are German bodies because they don't know that the Rhine meadow camps exist...
A cameraman filming SS men how they take dead bodies to the pit (15min. 12sec.) 
When there had been tattooed numbers
then the media staff had shown these tattoos with zooms at once.
SS men have to take the dead bodies from the trailer to the pit, the bodies have no spots (14min. 30sec.)
Not one single dead body has got a tattooed number as Jewish captives had in German concentration camps.
These dead bodies are totally clean and there is no earth on them, thus these
bodies NEVER were buried and NEVER have been digged out
Not one single body has got a tattooed number as Jewish detainees
had in German concentration camps. There is no striped German zebra uniform for detainees in German concentration camps
as Jews had. And the dead bodies show no remnants of earth or other contamination by earth. Thus these bodies were not buried
and not digged out. These bodies mostly have dark clothes and remnants of German army uniforms. Thus these are German dead
bodies in Bergen-Belsen being taken to the mass grave by force of arms of the criminal occupation forces. Hitchcock simply
indicates that these would be Jewish bodies. And the stupid journalists are not aware of the fraud spreading it in the whole
world, also in "neutral" Switzerland where the Red Cross has got it's seat and where the documents show how the
German concentration camps really were...
Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 01, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of
detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min. 14sec.)
Thus these dead bodies are NOT Jewish detainees but very probably German
victims from Eisenhower's Rhine meadow camps.
Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 02, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of
detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min.21sec.)
Thus these dead bodies are NOT Jewish detainees but very probably German
victims from Eisenhower's Rhine meadow camps.
An SS group in a mass grave under the order of British machine guns (23min. 55sec.) 
The machine gun of the criminal allies is dictating the allied
meaning here. In Germany there is developing a submissive mentality concerning the persecution of the Jews and at the end
any free research is prohibited.
with a medical doctor in white (5min. 31sec.) 
Medical doctors of the allies also have got the white dress as one can see here in this scene.
Here a person is speaking presenting himself as a medical doctor Mister Fed Little (Fritz Klein),
and he says that this day would be April 24, 1945 standing before the mass grave (15min. 54sec.) 
This person is speaking German perfectly claiming to be a "medical doctor" from
Romania being working in concentration camps since 1 1/2 years already. But he does not even have a doctor's white dress
on and he is not stating any cause of death in his speech. Thus this is probably no doctor but is is a background artist
making a statement in this film for a pocket money stating being a medical doctor and stating that this day would be April
24, 1945 (but April 1945 was very cold and wet...
mayors and pastors have to see the piles of bodies (13min. 9sec.) 
Also these mayors are going into the trap that these would be
Jewish bodies. British occupation force is operating with force of arms and personal meanings contradicting the official
one is punished by shooting.
telling-off at the mass grave with wards with machine guns (17min. 35sec.) 
With the constant extortion of being shot the criminal occupation
forces (here the British) are asserting the meaning that the bodies would be Jews...
The commander of Bergen-Belsen, Josef Kramer, portrait (6min. 19sec.) 
He was the victim
of the criminal Western Allies - in his case by the British occupation forces - they made the calumny blaming Mr. Kramer
for being responsible for 70,000 Jewish deads which have never been...
wards in Bergen-Belsen (6min. 5sec.) 
They were also victims of the criminal Western allies, in this case of the British occupation forces.
They were blamed for having caused the death of 70,000 Jews...
An English operations manager speaking with revolver to the camera "We
actually don't know what has been going on in these camps" (24min. 6sec.) 
At the end of his speech he is confessing that he
did not know what was going on precisely in this camp. He only knew what he was fighting for: <We actually don't know,
what has been going on in these camps. I know personally what I am fighting for.> (24min.28-35sek.)
An English reporter with Hebrew accent
is installed before the mass grave from allegedly April 24, 1945 filled with dead bodies (24min. 44sec.) - stating he "does
not know where the dead bodies are coming from"... 
Thus the reporter
does not know where the bodies are coming from, and there is no medical investigation either!!!
Here is the statement of the English Hebrew reporter:
<I am T. D. Tredges, attached as partway to controlling this camp. [...] I have been here 8 days. And never in my life
I have seen such damnable gustiness. This morning they brought about 5,000 bodies. We don't know from where they are. Behind
me you can see the pit which contain another 5,000. There were two others like it in preparation. All these deaths have
been caused by systematic starvation and typhus and disease - it has been splead - because of the treatment meeted out for
this poor people by the SS guards and their SS chief.> (24min.35sek.-25min.23sek.)
Hitchcock also lying about typhus
And another lie is spread by Hitchcock stating that there were lice in Bergen Belsen and not
enough soup and water causing typhus [?!] (18min. 16-19sec.).
<Lack of soup and water brought lice to the
inmates, and lice carried typhus.>
Well, typhus does not come from lice,
and lice do not come from too less soup or water, but typhus is a fever with belly aches and constipation caused by intestine
bacteria when people are not washing their hands after the toilet having remnants of excrements under their finger nails
eating these remnants by food or otherwise entering their mouth. Wikipedia says:
<[...] rise of fever, belly aches, constipation and higher body
temperature, slower heart beat. Cause of typhus is the bacterium Salmonella Typhi (Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica Serovar
Typhi) [...] There is paratyphus with not so strong symptoms than typhus, not caused by Salmonella Typhi but by Salmonella
Paratyphi. [...] The agent is a typhus bacterium (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Typhi), a feces bacteria transmitted
orally for example by contaminated food or water. Today typhus is more the problem of development countries. In industrial
countries it's an exception. Big parts of typhus illnesses is in connection with journeys to far countries with low hygienic
standard. Immunization should be done for journeys to tropical areas like India also when it's only a partial protection.
World wide typhus disease is affecting 32 million people every year.>
orig. in English: <[...] fever, abdominal pain, constipation and for the high body temperature rather slow heartbeat (relative bradycardia ) is characterized. The disease is caused by the bacterium Salmonella Typhi ( Salmonella enterica ssp. Enterica serovar
typhi ). [...] Paratyphoid is an attenuated disease of typhoid fever, not Salmonella
typhi , but Salmonella paratyphi . [...]The causative agent is the typhoid bacterium ( Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar
typhi), a Gram-negative , flagellated bacterium that is transmitted fecal - orally , for example, through contaminated food or contaminated water . Typhus is a problem of developing countriestoday . Cases in industrial nations are the exception; a large proportion of the typhoid diseases
that occur here are associated with long-distance travel of those affected to countries with low hygienic standards. When traveling to tropical areas (eg India ), immunization should be considered, even if it provides only partial protection. Worldwide,
about 32 million people fall ill each year>
(from Wikipedia: Typhus: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhus)
service at the mass grave - and the text of Hitchcock - the German text is not permitted
A pastor speaking the divine service at the mass grave (25min. 38sec.) 
A pastor speaking the divine service at the mass grave, view on the book (25min. 42sec.)
Hitchcock is saying
his own sarcastic text not allowing the speech of the German pastor:
<We should never know who they were, or for pot holms [?] they were torn, whether they were catholics, Lutherans, or
Jews: We only know they were born, they suffered, and they died - in agony in Belsen camp.> (25min.30sek.-26min.12sek.)
The mass graves of Bergen-Belsen are marked with boards but there is not written
if there are Jews, Germans, English or French buried.
This data of 26 April 1945 for the mass grave is not probable because April 1945 was wet and cold in
Germany even with snow. Therefore installing this mass grave could have been in June 1945.
grave in Bergen Belsen Nº 6 with about 800 deads 
When a camp is even burnt down by the allies then it's clear that any proof is destroyed which could be a proof for the
British allies invented a typhus epidemic and by this invented reason they burnt down the Bergen Belsen
camp (26min. 50sec.) 
then the whole camp was flattened and nothing was left of it. Thus there is even a bigger suspicion that the allies have
to conceal something. And just in this procedure the only real striped German detainee's uniform is shown in the film. Thus
it's clear what ware the dead bodies in the film: German bodies, most probably from the Rhine meadow camps.
A bulldozer flattening Bergen Belsen camp cutting the barbed wire fence (27min. 58sec.) 
A bulldozer "taking" a striped
detainee's uniform of German concentration camps which was NEVER seen in the film before (28min. 4sec.) 
More photos from the faked Hitchcock film about German concentration camps "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary
On The Nazi Holocaust"
When the links are not working, go to http://www.youtube.com looking for the title "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust", so you get the
actual links of the film. Always look for the film of 53 min. 1 sec.
Faked scenes about cc Dachau
lies about undernourished detainees
Most of the detainees in German concentration
camps were well nourished considering the testimonies of original detainees after the war. Here are some examples from the
German concentration camp of Dachau:
Detainees in the concentration camp of Dachau 01 sitting in the window (30min. 30sec.) 
Concentration camp of Dachau, portrait of a detainee 02 830min. 40sec.) 
And one has to know: German concentration camps were under the control of the Red Cross like herein Bergen Belsen (11min.
German concentration camps were under the control of the Red Cross AND of the
Zionists. People affected by heavy illnesses were brought to hospitals by cars of the Red Cross or to military hospitals.
Lies of Hitchcock about shower
rooms as "gas chambers"
Washer nozzle in a shower room in the concentration camp
of Dachau (34min. 25sec.) 
There is this clear proof: granulate of "Cyclone B" cannot pass the little holes of this washer nozzle.
All gassing in shower rooms is a criminal fantasy of Zionist mass murderers Eisenhower, Baruch, Morgenthau, Roosevelt, and
Hitchcock. It's a normal war propaganda with a giant calumny against the enemy.
The lies of Hitchcock about crematories:
single muffle furnaces are not made for masses of bodies
This crematory is shown in the film to
be in Dachau, with single muffle furnaces (35min. 20sec.) 
There is the following principle: Such single muffler furnaces in crematories are made for single burning
of dead bodies getting the ashes for the family of the dead. When there would be masses of dead bodies then a bigger oven
had been built for burning about 20 bodies in one. Obviously such a mass death has NOT happened ant there were only some
singular burnings of deads bodies. Additionally one has to know that in these German cc - as investigations by Faurisson
showed - many crematories were built only AFTER the war by the criminal Zionists - as a propaganda and nothing more!
A train with detainees at the cc Dachau in February
There was this train with detainees allegedly at the cc
Dachau in February 1945 about (36min. 20sec.) 
At the end
of the Third Reich the whole infrastructure was collapsing. The remaining camps were overcrowded and the trains with the
detainees had last priority. Thus a transport was not 3 days but 30 days. Such trains with detainees came to Dachau and
the SS leadership of the cc Dachau had not the spirit any more to build a military hospital for the deads and half deads
of this train and had not the spirit to install a cemetery. This omission was exploited by the criminal "Americans".
Instead of helping and helping the survivors and honoring the many 1,000s surviving detainees in the concentration camp
of Dachau the SS leadership was killed and executed because of this neglected train with detainees.
Point 3: The principle of the cut in the films of criminal Mr. Hitchcock
First one can see well nourished detainees, mostly with striped zebra detainee's uniforms,
and then comes the cut showing the emaciated German prisoners of war from summer 1945 on the meadows or in the mud of the
Rhine meadow camps in the contaminated gray uniforms WITHOUT the typical striped zebra uniforms of detainees from German
concentrations camps in the Third Reich. The title of the film "Documentary" sounds well but this is a film where
practically everything is a fake:
Gas chamber scenery has been
taken after May 1945 for presenting this fantasy to the whole world provoking a bad mood against Germans. And in this way
the English "American" and Zionist propaganda hast manipulated the brains in the world during more than 50 years
and placed their Zionist slaves in the media in the whole world spreading this propaganda on and on. The truth about the
German concentrations camps can be seen here for example:
4: Jews telling from German concentration camps: music, theater, soccer
Jewish testimonies from German concentration camps report regularly about work and music and theater and even soccer in the
camps. Here are examples from Shoa Foundation "Survivors who tell the truth":
Point 5: Effect of the faked Hitchcock films about
German concentration camps on the Nuremberg Process - where is the war tribunal for criminal "U.S.A."?
And now one has to know that the regime of Eisenhower against Germans was not only with the Rhine meadow camps causing
1 million Germans deads and the hunger regime during the post-war era in Germany from 1945 to 1950 provoking 5 million more
German deads - but by these faked Hitchcock films the "U.S.A." have influenced the Nuremberg Process in a way
so Germany was convicted with a faked 6 million murder against Jews and had to pay for this, and the allies were exempted
from any guilt and the mass murderer Eisenhower was not detected until 1989 when historian James Bacque came with his research.
These criminal "U.S.A." have to be torn to a war tribunal for being convicted for their wars, fakes and manipulations
not only concerning the "American" war crimes in Germany 1943-1950 (also the destruction of towns had not to be
and the war could have been finished in 1943 already), but also concerning Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Iraq, Afghanistan etc.
"U.S.A." are the most destructive state in the world destroying all other states by bombs and propaganda - and
the proofs are very distinct concerning Germany of 1945 here on this web site. And perhaps the criminal Zionists have to
pay money back which was payed for a mass murder of millions which was NEVER COMMITTED - pay money back to Germany.
Point 6: No mass murder against the Jews in German concentration camps - but other
sites with mass death
With all these data there is absolutely safe: There
was no mass murder in German concentration camps against the Jews in the dimension of 100,000s or millions. The real sites
with many deads in the persecution of the Jews were
-- Auschwitz with epidemics because
the camps was in a marsh and bodies were buried contaminating the ground and the drinking water
-- behind the
Eastern Front the remaining Jews who were not deported by Stalin to Russia in 1940 and 1941 and who were not taken by industries
or the Red Army in 1941 were shot partly from 1941 to 1943 in mass shootings partly by the Wehrmacht or by SS commands
(with Germans, Ukrainians, Baltic people and Belorussians etc.) or also by local anti-Semitic population themselves. Zionists
did not protect the Jews from Eastern Europe because they did not want them to have in Palestine for the colonization in
-- the same mass murder for Jews counts for the Red Army where Stalin and
his commanders let fight many Jews in the first rows as "cannon fodder"
-- since 1943 detainees were
taken back from Eastern Europe to the Reich to building sites of the tunnel constructioning and fell sick and died there
-- at the same time Hitler and Stalin organized in common the clandestine deportation
of European Jews to the GULAG
-- in 1944 and in 1945 there were some 1,000 Jewish victims in the remaining overcrowded
camps because of hunger and epidemics, in trains and in death marches as a "penalty" for the defeat of Germany
in the war
-- since 1945 many Jewish women who had suffered hunger a long time during years could not recover
well and had no fertility any more
-- Jewish children being safe on "Christian" farms were often not
given back because nobody knew where the Jewish parents were and because many men were missing on the farms and there was
a general lack of staff
-- many Jews also separated from Jewry in general for not being persecuted any more.
-- from 1945 to 1946 Stalin let come back 100,000s of Jews from central Russia to Eastern
Europe and this provoked new pogroms in Poland. Kiev in the Ukraine became a broad Jewish center and in 1946 Kiev had more
Jews than in 1939. At the same time the "American" President Truman was bribed by the Zionists with 2 million
Dollars permitting a racist "Jewish State" in Palestine against all Muslims...
-- and when in 1948 this bribed and criminal "U.S.A." bribed by Zionists was "opening" the new "satellite"
of Israel in the Middle East, Stalin felt encircled and betrayed and he shut the Iron Curtain for Jews and all Jews in Russia
could not leave the country until Gorbachev until 1986. Stalin let russify the Jews by discriminations in professions
-- and Stalin's direct answer to the foundation of the racist Zionist state of Israel under the patronage of the
criminal racist "U.S.A." was the blockage of Berlin.
We thank to the criminal
Zionist bribed and undermined "U.S.A." for their destructive and terrorist "cultural contribution".
Mainstream Holocaust Narrative 'Substantially, if not Entirely, False'
- Editor of Top US Conservative Site (Ron Unz)
The author spends a few weeks perusing the literature, which
he summarizes in this 18,000 word article, and concludes that the Holocaust story relentlessly hammered into the public
consciousness by Jewish-owned Hollywood and media is a load of baloney. He suspects that when the lie comes crashing
down, a political earthquake will ensue.
"I wouldn’t be surprised if our current Holocaust narrative eventually suffers that
same fate (total collapse), perhaps with unfortunate consequences for those too closely associated with having maintained
I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and political leaders said about major events
in the here and now, their credibility on controversial happenings so long ago and far away entirely disappeared."
Reason Magazine and Holocaust
A few years
ago I somehow heard about a ferocious online dispute involving a left-leaning journalist named Mark Ames and the editors
of Reason magazine, the glossy flagship publication of America’s burgeoning libertarian movement.
Although I was deep in my difficult programming work, curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to take a look.
During the Immigration
Wars of the 1990s, I’d become quite friendly with the Reasonpeople, frequently visiting their offices,
especially during my “English” campaign of 1998, when I’d located my own political headquarters in the
same small Westside LA office building they used.
As my content-archiving software project began absorbing more and more of my time during the early 2000s, I’d
gradually lost touch with them, but even so, the 40-odd years of their magazine archives had become the first publication
I’d incorporated into my system, and I was now pleased to discover that both sides in the ongoing feud had put my
system to good use in exploring those old Reason issues.
the libertarians grouped around Reason had successfully been making political inroads into Silicon Valley’s
enormously wealthy technology industry, and had now organized a major conference in San Francisco to gather together their
Their left-leaning rivals decided to nip that project in the bud by highlighting some of the
more unsavory ideological positions that mainstream libertarian leaders had once regularly espoused. Perhaps Ron Paul and
other libertarians might oppose overseas wars and drug laws, and support cutting taxes and regulations, but they and their
Republican Party allies were unspeakably vile on all sorts of other issues, and all “good thinkers” should therefore
stay very far away.
The debate began in rather mundane fashion with an article by Ames entitled “Homophobia, Racism, and the Kochs” denouncing Reason for sharing a platform with a high-ranking Republican Congresswoman of Christian
conservative views, as well as the magazine’s reliance upon Koch funding and its alleged support for Apartheid South
Africa during the 1970s and 1980s.
The response by the Reasoneditor seemed quite persuasive, and he rightfully dismissed the guilt-by-association attacks.
He also outlined the gross errors and omissions in the charges regarding South Africa, and ridiculed Ames as a notoriously
error-prone “conspiracy theorist.” Surely few outsiders would have paid any attention to such a typical exchange
of mudslinging between rival ideological camps.
But then things took a very different turn, and a week later Ames returned with a 5,000 word article bearing a title sure to grab attention: “Holocaust Denial.” He claimed that in 1976 Reason had
published an entire special issue devoted to that explosive topic.
Surely everyone on the Internet has encountered numerous instances of
Holocaust Denial over the years, but for a respectable magazine to have allotted a full issue to promoting that doctrine
was something else entirely. For decades, Hollywood has sanctified the Holocaust, and in our deeply secular society accusations
of Holocaust Denial are a bit like shouting “Witch!” in Old Salem or leveling accusations of Trotskyism in the
Court of the Red Czar.
Progressive Sam Seder’s Majority
Reportradio show devoted a full half-hour segment to the charges against Reason, and Googling “Reason Magazine”+”Holocaust Denial”
today yields thousands of hits. This substantial explosion of Internet controversy was what caught my own attention at the
initial reaction was one of puzzlement. Reason had been the first periodical I had digitized in my system
a dozen years earlier, and surely I would have noticed an entire issue promoting Holocaust Denial. However, I soon discovered
that February 1976 had been excluded from the supposedly complete set the magazine had shipped me for processing, an omission
that itself raises serious suspicions. But Ames had somehow located a copy in a research library and produced a full PDF,
which he conveniently placed on the Internet to support his accusations.
Carefully reading his article and then glancing through the contents, I decided that his accusation was technically
false but substantially true. Apparently the actual theme of the issue was “Historical Revisionism” and except
for a couple of paragraphs buried here and there among the 76 pages, Holocaust Denial never came up, so characterizing it
as a Holocaust Denial issue was obviously a grotesque exaggeration.
But on the other hand, although few of the authors were familiar to me, it seemed undeniably
true that they were numbered among America’s more prominent Holocaust Deniers, and most of them were deeply associated
with organizations situated in that same camp.
Furthermore, there were strong indications that their positions on that topic must
certainly have been known to the Reasoneditors who commissioned their pieces.
The clearest case comes when Ames quoted
the explicit statements of Dr. Gary North, a prominent libertarian thinker who had served as one of Ron Paul’s earliest
Congressional aides and later became his longtime partner in politics and business:
Probably the most far-out materials on World War II revisionism
have been the seemingly endless scholarly studies of the supposed execution of 6 million Jews by Hitler. The anonymous author
[Hoggan] of ‘The Myth of the Six Million’ has presented a solid case against the Establishment’s favorite
horror story—the supposed moral justification for our entry into the war…The untranslated books by the former
Buchenwald inmate Prof. Paul Rassinier, have seriously challenged the story…A recent and very inexpensive book in
magazine form, Did Six Million Really Die?, appeared in 1973, written by Richard Harwood.
A later issue carried
a thousand word letter by Prof. Adam Reed of Rockefeller University, a past Reason contributor, strongly
affirming the mainstream Holocaust narrative by quoting from standard works, and taking Dr. North to task for his citation
of Holocaust Denial works of doubtful quality. But North firmly stood his ground:
“The second point, that about 6 million Jews really
did die in the concentration camps, is one that will be open until the records of the period become fully available. I am
not convinced yet, one way or the other. I am happy to have Dr. Reed’s interpretation of the data, but until the publishing
companies and academic guild encourage the re-examination of the data, I shall continue to recommend that those interested
in revisionist questions read The Myth of the Six Million and Did Six Million Really Die? as
reasonable (though not necessarily irrefutable) pieces of historical revisionism. If a person can’t make up his mind,
he should do more reading.”
Dr. James J. Martin was the lead contributor to the February Revisionism issue, and the preceding
January issue had featured an extended Q&A by the editors, with one of the queries directly addressing the controversial
REASON: Dr. Martin, do you believe (1) that the specific charge against the Nazis of having a mass extermination
program of several million Jews is true, and (2) that the Allied atrocities were as great or greater than those of the Germans,
from your study of the question?
MARTIN: Well, I never made
a head count of all who lost their lives in the War-we’ve seen a wide variety of statistical materials, some of which
have been pulled out of thin air. As a consequence, it’s hard to make any kind of estimate of this sort, whether ten
more were killed on the one side or the other is not a particularly entrancing subject as far as I’m concerned.
Whether allegations can be proven it remains to be seen. I don’t believe
that the evidence of a planned extermination of the entire Jewish population of Europe is holding up. I have been influenced
over the years by the works of Paul Rassinier, and he still has to be reckoned with. His works have been ignored for a long
time, and sooner or later somebody’s going to have to do a decent job of coping with what he has presented. I think
Rassinier’s general case is sound at the moment and I haven’t seen any strong evidence to upset his allegations
or his assertions that there was no planned program for the extermination of European Jews.
His other main case is that there were no gas chamber extermination programs. The fact that a great many
people lost their lives is incontrovertible—that the German concentration camps weren’t health centers is well
known-but they appear to have been far smaller and much less lethal than the Russian ones.
Another major contributor to the issue was Dr.
Austin J. App, and just three years earlier he had published a short book bearing the lurid title The Six Million
Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks with Fabricated Corpses.
In a follow-up column by Ames’ own editor, the stunned reactions of various journalists are listed, with one of them Tweeting out “I
had no idea that Reason Magazine was once a haven for Holocaust Revisionism. Holy Moly.” Despite the angry obfuscations of present-day Reason staffers, this description seems quite correct.
Indeed, there seems considerable circumstantial
evidence that around that time “Holocaust Skepticism” extended rather broadly within the entire nascent libertarian
movement. Aside from the sharp critique of the aforementioned Prof.
Reed, the overwhelming majority of the reader responses seemed totally
favorable, with Samuel Konkin III, editor of New Libertarian Weekly and various similar publications,
suggesting that the February issue was one of the best they had ever published. David Nolan, founder of America’s
Libertarian Party, also praised the issue as “outstanding.”
The two editors of the issue in question even today remain quite prominent
figures at Reason and within American libertarianism, while the masthead then carried names such as David Brudnoy and Alan Reynolds, who both later became influential figures in conservative
and libertarian politics.
There seems no evidence of any resignations or angry recriminations following the issue’s publication, which
seems to have been digested with total equanimity, apparently arousing less rancor than might have been generated by a dispute
over monetary policy.
I’d never paid much attention to Holocaust discussions over the years, but the name of Murray Rothbard on the
1976 Reason masthead prompted a memory. Rothbard is widely regarded as the founder of modern libertarianism,
and I recalled in the 1990s reading somewhere that he had often ridiculed the Holocaust as being total nonsense, which had
stuck in my mind as a typical example of libertarian eccentricity. A quick Google search seemed to confirm my recollection that Rothbard was an avowed Holocaust Denier.
Although the whole controversy regarding Reason’s editorial
line of the mid-1970s soon died down, it remained a nagging puzzle in the back of my mind. I’d always been quite skeptical
of libertarian ideology, but my Reason friends from the 1990s had certainly seemed like smart and rational
people to me, hardly raving lunatics of any sort, and two of the ones I’d known best had been the co-editors of the
controversial issue in question.
I could easily understand how zealous libertarian ideologues might be swept past the point of rationality on certain
matters—perhaps arguing that the police and the army should be abolished as statist institutions—but the factual
question of what had or had not happened to the Jews of Europe during World War II hardly fell into that sort of category.
had always attracted a very large Jewish contingent, especially in its upper ranks, and one of the issue editors came from
that background, as did Rothbard and numerous others featured on the masthead. While deranged anti-Semitism is not impossible
among Jews, I would think that it is somewhat less likely. Clearly something very odd must have been going on.
I was then too busy
with my work to focus on the matter, but some months later I had more time, and began a detailed investigation. My first
step was to carefully read the Reason articles produced by those controversial writers previously unknown
to me. Although those pieces were not Holocaust-related, I thought they might give me a sense of their thinking.
To my surprise, the
historiography seemed outstandingly good, and almost certainly accurate based on what I had picked up over the years from
perfectly mainstream sources.
Dr. Martin’s long article on the notorious framing of “Tokyo Rose”was probably the best and most comprehensive treatment I had ever encountered on that topic, and Dr. App’s analysis
of the tragedy of the Sudeten-Germans was equally strong, raising several points I had previously not known. Percy Greaves effectively summarized many of the very suspicious aspects of the Pearl Harbor attack, and although his case for the prosecution against FDR was certainly not airtight, it accorded with the views presented
by numerous scholars in other books on the subject.
Moreover, his position was seconded by a young Bruce Bartlett, later a prominent Reagan and Bush official, and still later a strong Republican opponent
of George W. Bush, routinely feted by the New York Times. Most of the other writings also seemed of very high
quality, including Dr. North’s summary of World War II Revisionism.
general, the academic scholarship of those articles greatly surpassed anything found in opinion magazines of more recent
decades, Reason itself included. Those so interested can click on the above links, read the articles in
question, and decide for themselves.
Back then, Reason was a young and struggling magazine, with a shoestring
staff and budget. Publishing articles of such obvious quality was surely a remarkable achievement for which the editors
could feel justifiably proud, and the overwhelmingly positive letters they received seemed absolutely warranted.
Meanwhile, the nasty
attacks by Ames appeared to be those of a mere political hack who may not have even bothered actually reading the articles
whose authors he vilified.
As a further sign of Ames’ dishonesty, he flung the epithet “Nazi” some two dozen times in his
hack-job, along with numerous uses of “anti-Semitic” as well, and Greaves was certainly the subject of many of
But although Greaves and Bartlett wrote back-to-back articles on exactly the same Pearl Harbor topic, and according to Wikipedia, the former was the academic advisor to the latter on that subject, Bartlett’s name appears nowhere in Ames’s
hit-piece, presumably because denouncing a prominent policy expert much beloved by the New York Times as
an “anti-Semitic Neo-Nazi” might prove self-defeating.
Even leaving that aside, accusing the Jewish libertarians running Reason of
being Nazi propagandists must surely be the sort of charge that would strain the credulity of even the most gullible.
and Holocaust Denial
Ames’ credibility totally shredded, I decided to carefully reread his article again, looking for what clues I could
find to the whole bizarre situation. Academic scholars who publish very good history on certain subjects might still have
totally irrational views on others, but normally one would assume otherwise.
It appeared that much of Ames’ understanding of the issue had come
from a certain Deborah Lipstadt, whom he characterized as a great Holocaust expert. Her name was very vaguely familiar to
me as some sort of academic activist, who years before had won a major legal victory over a rightwing British historian
named David Irving, and Irving himself received further denunciations in the Ames article.
However, one name did stick out. Apparently
based on Lipstadt’s information, Ames described Harry Elmer Barnes as “the godfather of American Holocaust denial
literature” and Martin’s “Holocaust denial guru.”
A dozen years earlier, the name “Barnes” would have meant almost
nothing to me. But as I produced my content-archiving system and digitized so many of America’s most influential publications
of the last 150 years, I had soon discovered that many of our most illustrious public intellectuals—Left, Right, and
Center—had been suddenly purged and “disappeared” around 1940 because of their stalwart opposition to FDR’s extremely aggressive foreign policy, and Barnes, an eminent historian
and sociologist, had been among the most prominent of those.
He had been one of the earliest editors at Foreign Affairs and
for many years afterward his important articles had graced the pages of The New Republic and The
Nation, while even after his fall, he had edited Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, an important 1953 collection of essays by himself and other once-prominent figures. But to have a figure of such intellectual
stature accused of being a Holocaust Denier, let alone the “godfather” of the entire movement, seemed rather
bizarre to me.
Since Ames was merely an ignorant political hack transmitting the opinions of others, I moved on Lipstadt, his key
source. Anyone who has spent much time on the comment-threads of relatively unfiltered websites has certainly encountered
the controversial topic of Holocaust Denial, but I now decided to try to investigate the issue in much more serious fashion.
A few clicks on the
Amazon.com website, and her 1993 book Denying the Holocaust arrived in my mailbox a couple of days later, providing
me an entrance into the mysterious world.
Reading the book was certainly a tremendous revelation to me. Lipstadt is a professor of Holocaust
Studies with an appointment in Emory University’s Department of Theology, and once I read the opening paragraph of
her first chapter, I decided that her academic specialty might certainly be described as “Holocaust Theology.”
was incredulous. She found it hard to believe that I was turning down an opportunity to appear on her nationally televised
show. “But you are writing a book on this topic. It will be great publicity.” I explained repeatedly that I would
not participate in a debate with a Holocaust denier. The existence of the Holocaust was not a matter of debate.
I would analyze and illustrate who they
were and what they tried to do, but I would not appear with them…Unwilling to accept my no as final, she vigorously
condemned Holocaust denial and all it represented. Then, in one last attempt to get me to change my mind, she asked me a
question: “I certainly don’t agree with them, but don’t you think our viewers should hear the other
Lipstadt’s absolute horror at having someone actually dispute the tenets
of her academic doctrine could not have been more blatant. Surely no zealous theologian of the European Dark Ages would
have reacted any differently.
The second chapter of her book supported that impression. Since many of the individuals she castigates as Holocaust
Deniers also supported the Revisionist perspective of the underlying causes of the First and Second World Wars, she harshly
attacked those schools, but in rather strange fashion.
In recent years, blogger Steve Sailer and others have ridiculed what they describe as the “point-and-sputter” style of debate, in which a “politically-incorrect”
narrative is merely described and then automatically treated as self-evidently false without any accompanying need for actual
refutation. This seemed to be the approach that Lipstadt took throughout her rather short book.
For example, she provided a very long list of leading academic
scholars, prominent political figures, and influential journalists who had championed Revisionist history, noted that their
views disagree with the more mainstream perspective she had presumably imbibed from her History 101 textbooks, and thereby
regarded them as fully debunked.
Certainly a Christian preacher attempting to refute the evolutionary theories of Harvard’s E.O. Wilson by
quoting a passage of Bible verse might take much the same approach. But few evangelical activists would be so foolish as
to provide a very long list of eminent scientists who all took the same Darwinist position and then attempt to sweep them
aside by citing a single verse from Genesis.
Lipstadt seems to approach history much like a Bible-thumper, but a particularly
dim-witted one. Moreover, many of the authors she attacked had already become familiar to me after a decade of my content-archiving
work, and I had found their numerous books quite scholarly and persuasive.
Barnes, in particular, figured quite prominently in Lipstadt’s chapter
and throughout her book. The index listed his name on more than two dozen pages, and he is repeatedly described as the “godfather”
of Holocaust Denial, and its seminal figure. Given such heavy coverage, I eagerly examined all those references and the
accompanying footnotes to uncover the shocking statements he must have made during his very long scholarly career.
I was quite disappointed.
There is not a single reference I could find to his supposed Holocaust Denial views until just the year before his death
at age 79, and even that item is hardly what I had been led to believe.
In a 9,300 word article on Revisionism for a libertarian publication,
he ridicules a leading Holocaust source for claiming that Hitler had killed 25 million Jews, noting that total was nearly
twice their entire worldwide population at the time. In addition, Barnes several times applied the word “allegedly”
to the stories of the Nazi extermination scheme, an sacrilegious attitude that appears to have horrified a theologian such
in a short, posthumously published review of a book by French scholar Paul Rassiner, Barnes found his estimate of just 1
million to 1.5 million Jewish deaths quite convincing, but his tone suggested that he had never previously investigated
the matter himself.
So although that last item technically validated Lipstadt’s accusation that Barnes was a Holocaust Denier,
her evidence-free claims that he was the founder and leader of the field hardly enhances her scholarly credibility. Meanwhile,
all the many tens of thousands of words I have read by Barnes has suggested that he was a careful and dispassionate historian.
A notorious incident
that occurred soon after the Bolshevik Revolution came to my mind. Eminent philologist Timofei Florinsky, one of Russia’s
most internationally renowned academic scholars, was hauled before a revolutionary tribunal for a public interrogation about
his ideas, and one of the judges, a drunken Jewish former prostitute, found his answers so irritating that she drew her
revolver and shot him dead right there and then.
Given Lipstadt’s obvious emotional state, I have a strong suspicion that she
might have wished she could deal in a similar fashion with Barnes and the numerous other scholars she denounced. Among other
things, she noted with horror that more than two decades after his 1940 purge from public life, Barnes’ books were
still required reading at both Harvard and Columbia.
All of us reasonably extrapolate what we already know or can easily check against
what is more difficult to verify, and the remaining chapters of Lipstadt’s book left me very doubtful about the reliability
of her work, all of which was written in a similar near-hysterical style.
Since she had already been vaguely known to me from her well-publicized
legal battle against historian David Irving more than a dozen years earlier, I was hardly surprised to discover that many
pages were devoted to vilifying and insulting him in much the same manner as Barnes, so I decided to investigate that case.
I was only slightly
surprised to discover that Irving had been one of the world’s most successful World War II historians, whose remarkable documentary findings had completely upended our knowledge of that conflict and its origins, with his
books selling in the many millions.
His entire approach to controversial historical issues was to rely as much as possible upon
hard documentary evidence, and his total inability to locate any such documents relating to the Holocaust drove Lipstadt
and her fellow ethnic-activists into a frenzy of outrage, so after many years of effort they finally managed to wreck his
of curiosity, I read a couple of his shorter books, which seemed absolutely outstanding historiography, written in a very
measured tone, quite different from that of Lipstadt, whose own 2005 account of her legal triumph over Irving, History
on Trial, merely confirmed my opinion of her incompetence.
Lipstadt’s first book Beyond Belief, published in 1986,
tells an interesting story as well, with her descriptive subtitle being “The American Press and the Coming of the
Holocaust, 1933-1945.” Much of the volume consists of press clippings from the American print media of that era interspersed
with her running rather hysterical commentary, but providing little analysis or judgment.
Some of the journalists reported horrifying
conditions for Jews in pre-war Germany while others claim that such stories were wildly exaggerated, and Lipstadt automatically
praised the former and denounced the latter without providing any serious explanation.
Lenni Brenner’s remarkable book Zionism in the Age of the Dictators had been published three years earlier. Although I only discovered it very recently, surely any half-competent specialist
in her own topic would have noticed it, yet Lipstadt provided no hint of its existence.
Perhaps the reality of the important Nazi-Zionist
economic partnership of the 1930s, with Nazi officials traveling to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and leading Nazi
newspapers praising the Zionist enterprise might have complicated her simple story of fanatic German Jew-hatred under Hitler
steadily rising towards an exterminationist pitch. Her faculty appointment in a Department of Theology seems very apt.
coverage is just as bad, perhaps worse. She catalogs perhaps a couple of hundred print news reports, each describing the
massacre of hundreds of thousands or even millions of Jews by the Nazis.
But she expresses her outrage that so many of these reports were buried
deep within the inside pages of newspapers, a placement suggesting that they were regarded as hysterical wartime atrocity
propaganda and probably fictional, with the editors sometimes explicitly stating that opinion. Indeed, among these under-emphasized
stories was the claim that the Germans had recently killed 1.5 million Jews by individually injecting each one of them in
the heart with a lethal drug.
And although I don’t see any mention of it, around that same time America’s top Jewish leader Rabbi
Stephen Wise was peddling the absurd report that the Nazis had slaughtered millions of Jews, turning their skins into lampshades
and rendering their bodies into soap. Obviously, separating truth from falsehood during a blizzard of wartime propaganda
is not nearly as easy as Lipstadt seems to assume.
Ordinary Americans were apparently even more skeptical than newspaper editors. According
Writing in the Sunday New York Times Magazine, [Arthur] Koestler cited public opinion polls in the
United States in which nine of ten average Americans dismissed the accusations against the Nazis as propaganda lies and
flatly stated that they did not believe a word of them.
Lipstadt convincingly demonstrates that very few Americans seem to have
believed in the reality of the Holocaust during the Second World War itself, despite considerable efforts by agitated Jewish
activists to persuade them. Over the years, I have seen mention of numerous other books making this same basic point, and
therefore harshly condemning the American political leaders of the time for having failed “to save the Jews.”
Explicit and Implicit Holocaust Denial After World War II
Yet as I began further investigating the history of Holocaust Denial in the wake
of the Reason contretemps, I was very surprised to discover that this same pattern of widespread disbelief
in the Holocaust seems to have continued unabated after the end of the war and throughout the 1950s, being
especially strong among high-ranking American military figures, especially top generals and individuals with an Intelligence
background, who seemingly would have had the best knowledge of the true events.
Some years ago, I came across a totally obscure 1951 book entitled Iron
Curtain Over America by John Beaty, a well-regarded university professor. Beaty had spent his wartime years in
Military Intelligence, being tasked with preparing the daily briefing reports distributed to all top American officials
summarizing available intelligence information acquired during the previous 24 hours, which was obviously a position of considerable
zealous anti-Communist, he regarded much of America’s Jewish population as deeply implicated in subversive activity,
therefore constituting a serious threat to traditional American freedoms. In particular, the growing Jewish stranglehold
over publishing and the media was making it increasingly difficult for discordant views to reach