Click on this text to examine an actual holocaust perpetrated by JEWS upon the Ukrainians.


 
 
 

Despite billions of dollars and almost 70 years of non-stop propaganda to promote the
so-called Holocaust in WWII, a new survey shows that these efforts are failing
to persuade young people of its credibility and importance:

 

Jews have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense, with fines and imprisonment, and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured many against their official narrative.  The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever have done — and want to do in America — is criminalize not believing their improbable narrative.  It is their “education” that has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.
 

 



Well-nourished children – in a ‘death camp’?

SURVIVING CHILDREN
Do these JEWS  look like they've been starved?…
 
That's not how they would have looked like
in a Jew-run Soviet concentration camp, apart
from having been raped and sodomized, as well.

Likewise, in the Jew-occupied Palestine, their
fellow Jews could have had them killed and
cannibalized for their marketable body parts.

Whether in their guise as Judo-communists
or in their latter-day incarnation as Zionists,
the last people on earth the Jews would want
to be imprisoned by is anyone like themselves.

Mr Hitler's 1941 anti-Bolshevik Crusade made
the internment of Jews unavoidable – clearly
necessitated by the massive recruitment of
the Jews by the NKVD (KGB).  
 
The American
FBI and the German Gestapo had numerous
identical examples of having arrested some
Soviet spies – only to find that they've got
Jews in custody.  
 
 
By contrast, no such hostile
recruitment was ever evidenced in regard of
the Japanese-Americans, who were interned
on purely racial grounds.  (And how many of
them would have survived in the American
‘death camps’ – had the U.S. lost the war?)

As far as the Third Reich was concerned,
from 1941 on, the Jewish problem suddenly
became a matter of security, rather than
a racial or political matter.  
 
 
For example,
despite Mr Hitler's 1941 Commissar Order
providing for summary executions of all
terrorist suspects in a war zone, no measures
of any kind were taken against the Mountain
Jews of North Caucasus, as their Muslim
neighbours vouched that they weren't 
involved with communism.
 
 
 And the Germans
appreciated the friendly disposition on the
part of the Muslims, who, of course, were
glad to see the back of the Soviets – and paid
a terrible price when the scumbags returned.



Hungarian Jewish women with their babies at Dachau, May 1945
Of course, none of those babies could have been carried to term
in a Soviet concentration camp.  All of them would have been self-
aborted by the starved and overworked (and pack-raped) mothers.


 

Jews partially invented the "holocaust" to distract people from what the JEWS actually did to the Russians/Germans/Ukrainians/Poles etc.. Instead of appearing as  criminal oppressors, the JEW planners of all wars and the real bosses controlling our countries, are now considered "poor innocent victims" that we should never criticize.

 




GULAG boss Moishe Berman with his accomplices.
Semi-anonymous KGB cutthroats exterminated sixty six
million – and not one of those vile Judo-communist mass
murderers was ever prosecuted in ‘democratized’ Russia.


Yet the Jew/KGB-suborned Russian media gloated every
time some dying ex-SS-man was being dragged through
the courts by the bloodthirsty Jews in ‘democratic’ West.


Back in the Soviet times, KGB – this partly Jewish gang
of pimps, mass murderers and bumbling
poisoners – was a mere government agency.
 

And became the government itself.

 

Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent. By instilling unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity via the "holocaust", humanity is rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with, any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The "holocaust" is also an ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust survivors" through the collection of hundreds of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that continues to this day.


No one can deny
that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.


What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the use, of homicidal gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of human derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories" where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.

 

 

In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews. After World War II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations.

 

 

Indeed tens of thousands (The International Committee of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews) of imprisoned Jews died during the last months of WWII due to disease, especially typhus, and starvation. After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the losing side, food and medicine become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for those imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).


Indeed there were crematoriums
working overtime as a means of sanitarily disposing of disease ridden corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.


As a matter of fairness
, try to imagine what would have become of all the Japanese incarcerated in American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of war turned against an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they would have been massacred by furious Americans before they had starved to death.


Once you fully realize
that there were no "gas chambers" or such things as human skin lampshades, most of the Jewish narrative regarding the so called "holocaust" becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated by the lowest sort of scammers.


Only lies need laws for protection. There are many individuals who have been imprisoned in occupied Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting hatred for the Jews" whereas it's actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES.



Offer the FREE HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE to those who may need it:  http://user1252122.sites.myregisteredsite.com/id172.html

 
 
 

Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1, Jews for Hitler...

.

.

View the REAL PLAN for a massive HOLOCAUST perpetrated by JEWS titled EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (Part 5)...

.

.

Click on this text to watch a six minute video titled: Hard Facts Of The Holocaust Lies...

.

.

Click on this text to examine the enhanced HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE...

 ___________________________________________________________________________

 

 

“New Pages” of Anne Frank Diary Prove that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book

 

Two “newly discovered” pages from the “Diary of Anne Frank” — which supposedly contain risqué jokes — are in fact further proof that the book attributed to the Jewish teenager was in fact written by her father — because the “hidden” writing is, like most of the rest of the “diary,” in her father Otto Frank’s handwriting.

 

(The New Observer)

 

The “newly-discovered” pages were announced at a press conference at the “Anne Frank House” museum in Amsterdam, where researchers apparently were able to remove two brown paper pasted pages and “read” the obscured writing underneath using lamps and optical character recognition technology.

 

The compliant Jewish lobby controlled media focused all its attention on the contents of the “new pages,” but ignored the obvious fact of the difference in handwriting styles on the new pages, with the “new material” all in her father’s handwriting, which contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself.

 

In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war, and who then passed it off as “real” in order to sell it as a “holocaust memoir.”

 

The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times that year, when the copyright holders to the diary admitted Otto Frank’s involvement in an attempt to extend their control of the manuscript.

 

 
 

As the New York Times pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.”

 

Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February 2015.

But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period—by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.

 

The implications of this admission are obvious. As the New York Times put it:

 

While the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled its intentions a year ago, warnings about the change have provoked a furor as the deadline approaches. Some people opposed to the move have declared that they would defy the foundation and publish portions of her text.

 

Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. “If you follow their arguments, it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.”

 

The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed to be “Anne Frank’s diary” was in fact written by her father after the war—a fact which also explains the use of ball point pen in the “diary,” a writing device which only became available after 1945.

 

 

 

 

Click on this text to examine the Anne Frank Fraud.

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________

The Secular Religion of the 'HOLOCAUST'


The religion of "the Holocaust" is a secular one: it belongs to the lay world; it is profane; in actuality, it has at its disposal the secular arm, that is a temporal authority with dreaded power. It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets and its high priests. As one revisionist has observed, it has its circle of saints, male and female, amongst whom, for example, Saint Anne (Frank), Saint Simon (Wiesenthal) and Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (and macabre) buildings and its relics ...
_________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on this text to examine PEOPLE EXPOSING THE HOLOCAUST LIES...

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

 
 
 

Click on this text to watch JIM RIZOLI - HOLO-FACTS

.

 

.


 

 
 
 ______________________________________
 
 
Allied Attacks Killed Thousands of Camp Inmates: The 1945 'Cap Arcona' and 'Thielbek' Sinkings
Mark Weber -- Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n4p-2_Weber.html

All prisoners of German wartime concentration camps who perished while in German custody
are routinely regarded as "victims of Nazism" -- even if they lost their lives as direct or
indirect result of Allied policy ... Among the German concentration camp prisoners who perished
at Allied hands were some 7,000 inmates who were killed during the war's final week as they
were being evacuated in three large German ships that were attacked by British war
planes. This little-known tragedy is one of history's greatest maritime disasters.
 
_________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 

Auschwitz Chemistry: How Science Proves The ‘Final Solution’

Was Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives

By John Wear

 

 

 

 

 

 

Above: “Gassing Clothing”. Left: Healthy inmates at work sterilizing clothing. Right: Healthy prisoners at Auschwitz working in one of the larger clothing disinfestation chambers in the camp.

Above: The Auschwitz camp employed a number of delousing stations, which used steam and Zyklon-B to kill lice in prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave number 2, seen from the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing was put on hangers attached to a trolley and pushed inside the chamber. Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was pushed into the chamber on two short rails. The disinfection stations were constructed with double doors so that the infected and cleaned clothes would not be mixed together. This picture was taken while the camp was operational.

 

Source: Peter Winter, Chapter 10- Auschwitz

Source: https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau

Defenders of the Holocaust story have attempted to discredit scientific reports which disprove the existence of homicidal gas chambers at German camps during World War II. For example, Deborah Lipstadt’s defense attorney, Richard Rampton, referred in court to The Leuchter Report as “…a piece of so-called research which is not worth the paper it is written on…”[1]

 

Dr. Richard Green states about Germar Rudolf:

 

Owing to the fact that he actually has some understanding of chemistry, many of his deceptions are more sophisticated than other Holocaust deniers…Ultimately, he engages in the same deceptions and specious arguments as [Fred] Leuchter and [Walter] Lüftl , but the case he makes for those deceptions and arguments involves more difficult chemistry.”[2]

 

This article will discuss attempts by chemists to discredit scientific reports which disprove the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau during World War II.

 

Historical Background

 

In 1988, the Canadian government put Ernst Zündel on trial a second time for the criminal offense of knowingly disseminating false news about “the Holocaust.” As part of his defense in this trial, Zündel commissioned the American gas-chamber expert Fred Leuchter to make a scientific examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. The resulting Leuchter Report is the first scientific study of the alleged German homicidal gas chambers.[3]

 

In addition to reporting that the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were structurally unsuitable for gassing, Leuchter researched the chemical properties of the Zyklon B fumigant. Leuchter found that Zyklon B is a highly toxic compound that releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas. The released hydrogen cyanide gas clings to surfaces and  reacts chemically with materials containing iron, forming ferrocyanide compounds that have a distinctive blue color called Prussian Blue. Since building materials normally contain a certain amount of rust (iron oxide, usually between one and four percent), repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas would result in Prussian Blue staining on the walls of the alleged gas chambers.[4]

 

Leuchter took forensic samples from the alleged gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing facility at Birkenau. The samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory found no significant ferrocyanide compound traces in the samples taken from the alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the sample from a wall of the Birkenau delousing facility had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter concluded that this result would be impossible if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas.[5]

 

Germar Rudolf, a certified chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by writing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992. The Rudolf Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused on engineering and chemical aspects of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing facilities have Prussian Blue staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.

 

Rudolf also took samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Similar to Leuchter’s samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant traces of ferrocyanide residue on the same order of magnitude found in any other building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all showed very high ferrocyanide residues. Rudolf determined that, if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had taken place in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit similar ferrocyanide residue as the delousing chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded that mass gassings with Zyklon B did not occur in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.[6]

 

Kraków Institute of Forensic Research

 

The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that attempted to refute the Leuchter Report. The team from this forensic institute led by Dr. Jan Markiewicz claims not to have understood how it was possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas. The researchers therefore excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron cyanide compounds from their analyses, resulting in much lower cyanide traces for the delousing chambers. Their analysis made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a cyanide residue of close to zero. The Kraków researchers concluded from their analysis that since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all had the same amount of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers.

 

Germar Rudolf gave the Kraków researchers irrefutable proof that Prussian Blue can be formed in walls exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas, citing a case document in expert literature.[7] The authors of the Kraków report refused to change their report and admit they made a mistake. Rudolf writes:

 

The only ‘scientific’ attempt to refute Frederick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis turns out to be one of the biggest scientific frauds of the 20th century. How desperate must they be—those who try to defend the established version of the Holocaust, i.e., the alleged systematic extermination of Jews in homicidal ‘gas chambers’, that they resort to such obviously fraudulent methods?”[8]

 

British science historian Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom also refuted the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report, as succinctly summarized by the retired professor of the philosophy of science Dr. James H. Fetzer:

 

When the Auschwitz museum was confronted with the fact that the innocuous delousing chambers at Auschwitz have blue walls–due to being saturated with blue iron cyanide compounds–but the alleged homicidal gas chambers have not, they commissioned their own chemical research. Instead of testing wall samples for the chemicals that had caused the blue stains, the researchers they commissioned simply excluded those chemicals from their analysis by employing a procedure that could not detect them. They justified this measure with the claim that they did not understand exactly how these compounds could form and that they might therefore be mere artifacts. Researchers who don’t understand what they are investigating have no business becoming involved. In this case, however, it appears to be deliberate. They have deliberately ignored an obvious explanation–that Zyklon B was only used for delousing–which would have remedied their lack of comprehension. As a result of this failure to adhere to the principles of science, they produced a report of no scientific value, which they used to arrive at a predetermined conclusion.[9]

 

Dr. Arthur Robert Butz writes in regard to the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:

 

The argument, to the extent that it was intelligible enough to be summarized at all, was that they did not understand how the iron-cyanide compounds got to be there, so they decided to ignore them in reaching their conclusions. I don’t understand how the moon got there, so I will ignore all effects associated with it, such as tides. I hope I don’t drown.”[10]

 

Read Previous Article: Wear’s War Movie Review: “Mr Death” An Epic Propaganda Stuff Up & The Jewish Panic To Remedy It

 

Dr. James Roth

 

Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as an Analytical Chemist at Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply in porous materials such as brick and iron.[11]

 

Dr. Roth later changed his testimony in a documentary movie titled Mr. Deathproduced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:

 

Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[12]

 

Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes that Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death are wrong:

 

The 1999 film about Leuchter features an interview with the chemist [Dr. James Roth] who had done the analysis of his wall-samples back in 1988. He had done this “blind,” i.e. with no knowledge of where they had come from, which was correct scientific procedure. During the second Zündel trial in Toronto in 1988 he testified under oath concerning the method used and what Leuchter had sent him. He said back then that hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate into brick and mortar. But then, when he was interviewed again by Morris for his documentary, he suddenly stated that the results were quite meaningless, because the cyanide could only have soaked a few microns into the brickwork. Wow, that was quite a whopper. Mortar and brickwork are highly porous to hydrogen cyanide, obviously so because the delousing chambers were more or less equally blue inside and out, it had soaked right through. But you can watch him on video explaining this, as if he were confusing brick and mortar with rock. The latter will only absorb cyanide to a few microns of its surface.[13]

 

Germar Rudolf writes in regard to Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death: “It can be shown that Prof. Dr. James Roth is wrong for the following reasons:

 

  1. It is a fact that the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof, and Majdanek are saturated with cyanide compounds, and this not only superficially, but into the depth of the masonry, as I have demonstrated by taking samples from different depths of the wall. Compare in this regard my mortar and plaster Sample Pairs 9 & 11, 12 & 13, 19a & b…, which were each taken at the same spot but at different depths, as well as Sample 17, taken from below the overlying lime plaster (which is thus similar to 19b). These values prove that hydrogen cyanide can rather easily reach deep layers of plaster and mortar. But even the other samples taken from the surface prove that Prof. Roth’s allegation is wrong: Provided that most of the cyanide detectable today is present in the form of iron cyanide (Iron Blue and other cyanoferrates), as Prof. Roth assumes himself, his thesis would mean that 10% to 75% of the iron content of these samples are located in the upper 10 micrometers thin layer of the samples (0.010 mm), i.e., they are located in less than 1% of the entire sample mass. The rest of the samples, however, would have been massively deprived of iron. How this migration of a major portion of iron to a thin surface layer would have happened is inexplicable to me. Fact is that this simply could not happen.

  2. Furthermore, expert literature is detailed about the following:

    1. Hydrogen cyanide is an extremely mobile chemical compound with physical properties comparable to water…

    2. Water vapor can quite easily penetrate masonry material, and thus also hydrogen cyanide…

    3. Hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate thick, porous layers like walls…

  3. In addition, it is generally known that cement and lime mortar are highly porous materials, comparable for instance to sponges. In such materials, there does not exist anything like a defined layer of 0.01 mm beyond which hydrogen cyanide could not diffuse, as there can also be no reason, why water could not penetrate a sponge deeper than a millimeter. Steam, for example, which behaves physically comparable to hydrogen cyanide, can very easily penetrate walls.

  4. Finally, the massive discolorations of the outside of the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Birkenau and Stutthof, as shown in this expert report, are clearly visible and conclusive evidence for the fact of how easily hydrogen cyanide and its soluble derivatives can and do penetrate such walls.

As a professor of analytical chemistry, Prof. Roth must know this, so one can only wonder why he spreads such outrageous nonsense. That Prof. Roth is indeed a competent chemist can be seen from what he said during his testimony under oath as an expert witness during the above mentioned Zündel trial..: ‘In porous materials such as brick or mortar, the Prussian blue [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open, but as the Prussian blue formed, it was possible that it would seal the porous material and stop the penetration.

 

…It is also revealing that Prof. Roth mentioned during this interview that, if he had known where Leuchter’s samples originated from, his analytical results would have been different. Does that mean that Prof. Roth manipulates his result according to whether or not he likes the origin of certain samples? Such an attitude is exactly the reason why one should never tell an ‘independent’ laboratory about the origin of the samples to be analyzed, simply because ‘independence’ is a very flexible term when it comes to controversial topics. What Prof. Dr. Roth has demonstrated here is only his lack of professional honesty.”[14]

 

Dr. Richard Green

 

Dr. Richard Green, who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Stanford University, agrees with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassings with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers having blue staining. Green writes: “…the discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible processes could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.”[15]

 

Dr. Green’s speculation is absurd. Why would the Germans lean materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN against the outside walls of the delousing chambers? Dr. Green is desperate to find an alternative reason for the heavy blue staining on the outside walls of the delousing chambers.[16]

 

Germar Rudolf writes in regard to Dr. Green’s speculation:

 

One major rule of science is that it is impermissible to immunize a theory against refutation, here in particular by inventing untenable auxiliary hypotheses to shore up an otherwise shaky thesis…This is exactly what Dr. Green is doing: coming up with a ludicrous attempt at explaining a fact which does not fit into his theory. Yet instead of fixing his theory, he tries to bend reality.”[17]

 

Dr. Green also challenges the possibility of formation of any noticeable quantities of Prussian Blue in the alleged homicidal gas chambers. Dr. Green writes: “The difference in total cyanides (Prussian blue + non-Prussian blue) owes to the fact that Prussian blue formed efficiently in the case of the delousing chambers but not in the homicidal gas chambers, and Prussian blue once formed is likely to remain.”[18]

 

Dr. Green is not able to provide any convincing evidence why Prussian Blue would not form efficiently in the homicidal gas chambers. For example, Dr. Green states that masonry in the alleged homicidal gas chambers has a neutral pH value which does not allow for the formation of cyanide salts. Germar Rudolf writes: “But if that were true, how come huge amounts of cyanides did accumulate in the walls of the disinfestation chambers?”[19]

 

Rudolf has documented with expert literature on the chemistry of building materials that the cement mortars and concretes used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers are noticeably alkaline for many weeks, months, or even years. These walls would have been very much inclined to accumulate cyanide salts and to form Prussian Blue, even more so than the lime plaster of the disinfestation chambers.[20]

 

Conclusion

 

The alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau could not have been used to exterminate hundreds of thousands of people as described in pro-Holocaust literature for numerous reasons: 1) they did not have escape-proof doors and windows; 2) they did not have panic-proof equipment; 3) they did not have technically gastight doors and shutters; 4) they had no provision to quickly release and distribute the poison gas; and 5) they had no effective device to ventilate or otherwise render ineffective the poison gas after the execution.[21]

 

By contrast, Germany built highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice and save inmate lives. By one estimate, the SS at Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to bring the typhus epidemics raging there under control.[22] An enormous amount of information exists concerning these German delousing facilities[23], but no similar information exists regarding the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[24]

 

The roof of the semi-underground Morgue #1 of Crematorium II at Birkenau, which is said to have been the building’s homicidal gas chamber, remains intact to some degree today. Contrary to eyewitness testimony, that roof has no Zyklon-B-introduction holes. This has been acknowledged by pro-Holocaust researcher Robert Jan van Pelt. Since it is impossible to close holes measuring 70 x 70 cm from a concrete roof without leaving clearly visible traces, it is certain that no Zyklon-B-introduction holes ever existed at Crematorium II. Consequently, Zyklon B could not have been introduced through the roof at this morgue as alleged by pro-Holocaust supporters.[25]

 

As documented in this article, chemists adhering to the orthodox Holocaust narrative have failed to explain why the walls of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz/ Birkenau are permeated with Prussian Blue, while nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers. The only reasonable explanation is that Zyklon B was never used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes:

 

…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’thappen.”[26]

 

 
 

ENDNOTES

[1] Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence From the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 137, 435.

 

[2] Richard J. Green, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/.

 

[3] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 337. See the currently available edition of Leuchter’s report: Fred A. Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition, 4th ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2015.

 

[4] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 7.

 

[5] Leuchter, Fred A., “The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 138-139.

 

[6] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.

 

[7] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 9.

 

[8] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 369.

 

[9] Preface to: Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, pp. 12-13.

 

[10] Butz, Arthur R., “Historical Past vs. Political Present,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, p. 15.

 

[11] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in theCanadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers  Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.

 

[12] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, David John Caldwell Irving  vs. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf,

 

[13] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 66.

 

[14] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 342-345.

 

[15] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), pp. 18, 36, 41.

 

[16] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 347-349.

 

[17] Ibid., p. 348.

 

[18] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), p. 51.

 

[19] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 345.

 

[20] Ibid., pp. 345-346.

 

 

[21] Ibid., pp. 174-175.

 

[22] Ibid., pp. 175, 293.

 

[23] Berg, Friedrich R., “Zyklon B and the German Delousing Chambers,” Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1986, pp. 73-94;  http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p-73_Berg.html.

 

[24] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 114.

 

[25] Ibid., pp. 143-147.

 

[26] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.

 

Ernst and Ingrid Zündel. Never forgotten, always cherished. Their contribution to #Justice4Germans is immeasurable: The Desperate Measures To Enforce Belief In One & ONLY One Historical Event Are Escalating In Absurdity: Old Ladies Get Jail, Rapists Go Free</a

 

 

 

 
 
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.

How Israeli Post Zionists Manipulate the Holocaust (Part 2)
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.
 
 The Holocaust of Truth Gilad Atzmon
Gilad Atzmon discusses the hate campaign against him, the shutdown of free speech and his new book Being in Time: A Post-Political Manifesto.
 
 
Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist tells the story of how I first became aware of revisionist arguments challenging the orthodox Holocaust story, how it felt-how it felt was that it made me feel ashamed and made the palms of my hands sweat-and the first information I had the misfortune (?) to discover that there were serious questions to be asked about what I had believed all my life, with all my heart, about the unique monstrosity of the Germans.

A 1997 speech on Internet Free Speech and Revisionism - Rae West. This video includes Questions-and-Answers. Before the big revolution that the Internet caused on media, consider the next seven points, taken into consideration that some of this still happens now: 1. Revisionist criticisms aren't new, but have been suppressed; 2. There have been and are many hard-working revisionists; 3. The supposedly heavyweight historians don't debate; 4. No technical descriptions or investigations of 'gas chambers'; 5. Damning 'confessions' were extracted under torture; 6. Demographic figures have been avoided, and mythology substituted; 7. There are no photos of gas chambers.
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

Jewish ‘Auschwitz Survivor’ Admits He Lied About Everything..

 Joseph Hirt said he fabricated story of being sent to camp and meeting

Nazi doctor Josef Mengele to ‘keep memories alive’ about history of the Holocaust

by Theguardian



A Pennsylvania man who claimed for years to have escaped from Auschwitz,

met track and field star Jesse Owens and Nazi doctor Josef Mengele,

confessed on Friday that he had fabricated the entire story... of course.

“I am writing today to apologize publicly for harm caused to anyone because of my inserting myself into the descriptions of life in Auschwitz,” Joseph Hirt, 86, wrote in a letter sent to his local paper, LNP, this week.

“I was not a prisoner there. I did not intend to lessen or overshadow the events which truly happened there by falsely claiming to have been personally involved.”

“I was wrong. I ask forgiveness,” he added. “I determined at that moment to do everything in my power to prevent the loss of the truth about wartime life (and death) at Auschwitz.”
For years, Hirt gave public speeches at schools around the US about his experiences in the second world war, including his Jewish family’s flight from Poland to Belgrade.

But he also told people that he was arrested by the Nazis, sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz, and met Mengele, the SS physician who tortured prisoners of the concentration camp.

Hirt claimed to have escaped under an electric fence at the camp.

He added an extraordinary prologue and epilogue to the story, saying that he saw Adolf Hitler turn his back on Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, and that he met Eleanor Roosevelt and Owens after his arrival in the United States.

Earlier this year, New York history teacher Andrew Reid became suspicious of Hirt’s story and wrote a refutation of many of Hirt’s points.

The names of concentration camp victims and survivors are publicly available, and there is no record of Hirt at Auschwitz or elsewhere.

Hirt (showing his fake tattoo in the photo above) admitted in his letter that he had tattooed the camp number of Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi, the acclaimed author and chemist, on his left forearm:
“In no way an attempt to take on his identity, but in an effort to incorporate his symbol as a way of remembering him.”

Reid also found that Hirt’s escape story did not fit with camp records, that Mengele did not arrive at the camp until after the alleged escape, and other lies, errors and far-fetched claims in Hirt’s account.

He was a six-year-old Polish boy and extraordinarily unlikely to be anywhere near Hitler at the Olympics, for instance, and Owens’ biographer found the snub was likely a fabrication, possibly conflated with another black sprinter’s story.

Hirt is not the first to fabricate or exaggerate a Holocaust story. Herman Rosenblat, a Polish survivor, embellished his 1993 memoir and made up some parts entirely.

At the time, historian Ken Waltzer wrote in the New Republic that he was alarmed by how quickly people accepted the story.

Read: Anne Frank — the Jewish Girl That DIDN'T Write the Famous Auschwitz Diary

 

 

 

Click on this text to examine the enormity of Jewish lies regarding the HOLOCAUST HOAX...

.

.

Click on this text to examine the truth about AUSCHWITZ.

Click on this text to watch a video titled INSIDE AUSCHWITZ that reveals the truth about the work camp.

 
 
______________________________________________________
 
 
 

The Hoax that won’t die

 

How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust

 

By Carolyn Yeager

 

the first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out by the Nazis in Poland were supplied to newspapers around the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX

 

“the first authentic information about Hitler’s decision to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry came from an unnamed German industrialist who visited Switzerland in July 1942 and informed a Jewish friend of the World Jewish Congress … HOAX

 

the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium complex came from ‘two escaped Slovakian Jews’ working with the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX

 

 

The Holocaust is a hoax that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give it up.

 

Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians use. (‘Hoax’ derives from the magic incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that it was deliberately created to deceive and gain advantage, and continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda that got out of control, and indeed it has slipped out of its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon, fueling the world-wide ‘campaigns against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill of Jews and/or Israel.

 

But it is properly called a hoax because it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe, Britain and the United States.

 

It was inspired by rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near the sprawling I.G. Farben ‘Buna’ Rubber Plant.

 

Some of these inmates organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish Government-in-Exile in London. All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later.

 

This year, as every year since a resolution was established in 2005 by a voice vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress leads the way in recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.” The media faithfully plays up the day, and governments throughout the Western world pay tribute.

 

Amazing when you think about its reach. THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants” are joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day (however, it looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government leaders, the Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945 was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz camp was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army.

 

Yes, it’s amazing how much of our reality is created and developed without our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly harmless (and usually disguised in moral terms) votes in large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies.

 

In the articles that I have previously published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already been presented. In this article I will pull all this information together in an attempt to make the full case as to why the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far more than to any other single entity. We will see that the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the World Jewish Congress, and the final unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations came from the WJC, also.

 

The World Jewish Congress is the prime institution devoted to propagating Holocaust belief. Holocaust is part and parcel of their other main aims of “defending Jews around the world” and “supporting Israel.”

 

Udo Walendy

We will begin with Udo Walendy, German historian, author and publisher, and his examination of a very important report published in 1948 on the occasion of  the second plenary assembly of the WJC in Montreux, Switzerland. The title of the report is “Unity in Dispersion, a History of the World Jewish Congress.” It was published, and at the time I write can be read online here.

 

The World Jewish Congress is an openly Zionist organization. It’s name echos the first World Zionist Congress held in Basle, Switzerland in the year 1897, convened by Dr. Theodore Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew. Herzl’s portrait hangs in the office of the president at the WJC headquarters in New York City.

 

In the same spirit of uniting Jews to define and defend their interests, the World Jewish Congress was convened for the first time 39 years later in Geneva, Switzerland by Dr. Stephen S. Wise, another Budapest-born offspring of rabbis who was brought to New York as an infant.

 

At this Congress, of which they bragged of having 230 delegates representing 32 countries around the world, the vast majority (181) were from the United States, Poland, Roumania and Great Britain. From seven countries there was only one delegate, and from the rest, between 2 and 10. The center of worldwide Jewish interests and leadership had moved to the United States after WWI.

 

Nahum Goldmann, left, and Stephen Wise, right, playing on American patriotism in 1942.

 

Prior to this first Congress in 1936, a preparative World Jewish Conference was held in August 1932, also in Geneva. It was chaired by Dr. Nahum Goldmann, a Russia-born Jew who grew up in Germany. Some anti-Zionist German Jewish groups refused to participate. Goldmann defined the purpose as to establish a legitimate collective representation of all 16 million Jews in the world. At this conference, Nahum Goldmann and Stephen Wise were entrusted with the leading positions. At two more preparative conferences in ’33 and ’34, the rise to power of National Socialism became a main subject.

 

[Also in 1936, Samuel Untermeyer, who had called for a holy war against Germany in 1933, founded a World Anti-Nazi Council to Fight for Human Rights.” He partnered with British Unionist Walter Citrine, and the Council served as an Agent for “psychological warfare” and – concealed from the public – was to be financed by the Jewish Defense Fund. Winston Churchill became one of its activists.]

 

At the 1936 Congress, Nahum Goldmann made the radical announcement that the existing sovereignty of nations should be considered obsolete! The League of Nations should be reinforced (militarily, apparently) to safeguard the interests of the weaker groups in the world. By these weaker groups he meant Jews.

 

“Millions of Jews in eastern Europe are being disenfranchised and terrorized in the name of supremacy of the state and the dominant nation” he said, and

“Where the equal rights of a Jewish community are affected […] it becomes of common, worldwide Jewish interest.” (Surrender of Jewish rights anywhere equals surrender everywhere.)

 

“We know that we can only succeed by joining forces with the many others in the world who must fight with us.”

 

Goldmann also said that mankind had to fight against “an aggression which was started by Germany,” emphasizing that “fighting against Hitlerism is one of the most important tasks” and that “anti-Semitism must be branded an international crime.” He also stated that “propaganda is at present one of the main instruments of foreign politics,” with boycotts and international intelligence services required to be used as weapons. Remember this was in 1936 when Hitler was still being admired for bringing Germany back to economic health!

 

Goldmann became President of the permanent Administrative Committee and Wise President of the Executive Committee. In July 1940, the World Jewish Congress moved it’s headquarters to New York City, with the Geneva office continuing to exist under 29-year old Dr. Gerhart Riegner and Dr. Abraham Silberschein, maintaining contact with German-occupied countries and the International Red Cross.

 

WJC creates the Institute of Jewish Affairs as a research arm

 

In 1941, another section of the World Jewish Congress was founded as the “Institute of Jewish Affairs.” It was assigned the task of gathering information from all parts of the world concerning Jewish affairs, with the aim of submitting Jewish demands to the peace conference at the end of hostilities. The Jews were looking to get as much as they could out of the war – a war in which they knew very well they were not physically fighting! They thus wanted to emphasize their losses as Hitler’s political victims.

 

In order to best situate themselves, they decided to consider the period from 1919 to 1939 an “armistice,” not a peace. They stressed that a basis must be created by which “war crimes” could be punished retroactively from 1933. And of course, they would be the victims of these war crimes.

 

In June 1942, the Advisory Staff for European Jewish Matters (of the Institute of Jewish Affairs) met in coordination with the World Jewish Congress. Here, a demand was made for the first time that no peace negotiation should ever be carried out without representatives of the WJC participating.

 

The Institute of Jewish Affairs entertained close relations with the Geneva office and the British Section of the WJC in London. The British Section had built up a research staff of over thirty experts, allowing the Institute to compile a remarkable amount of material, including thousands of documents, press reports, papers, projects, drafts and manuscripts ready for printing. Some of the most important publications are:

 

  • Zorach Warhaftig, Starvation over Europe (1943);

  • Jews in Nazi Europe, Where Shall They Go? no authors named, (1941);

  • Hitler’s Ten Year War on the Jews (1943) (this book made a tremendous impression on the Allied governments and served as a basic textbook at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal)

An important paper transmitted to the American authorities was “The Conspiracy against the Jewish People,” the main chapters of which were headed:

 

  1. The Originally Conceived  Plan of Extermination of the Jewish People

  2. The Different Stages of the Crime Against the Jewish People

  3. The Responsibility of Individuals and Organizations (translated from the German original)

In Europe in January 1942, the National committee of ‘Free France’ convened for a discussion on German war crimes. But not one reference was made to the crimes against the Jews. So in February the World Jewish Congress asked for a specific statement with reference to the “many and special crimes against the Jews.” It took three months before the President of the Conference on crimes, General Wladyslaw Sikorski, replied that specifically referencing the Jews “might be equivalent to recognizing racial theories that we all reject.” (Touché! We can see from this that not everyone was on the same page about who were the victims of the Germans. Since the Poles evidently did not want to feature the Jews, the Jews went around them.)

 

After that rejection, the British section of the World Jewish Congress in June organized their own “Conference of the Press of the Free World” where Facts of a Systematic Extermination of European Jewry were announced (but not revealed in the conference minutes). This would have been the first suggestion of a planned extermination of Jews. Immediate reactions occurred in Britain and abroad. The BBC transmitted this type of news for the first time—and there were mass demonstrations in the US (organized by Jews) addressing war crimes and the need for the rescue of European Jewry. On 21 July 1942, Prime Minister Winston Churchill sent a message to a meeting held in Madison Square Garden, NYC, which contained the following:

 

The Jews were Hitler’s first victims, and ever since they have been in the forefront of resistance to Nazi aggression.

 

The World Jewish Congress jumped on this and announced that “This sentence rightly characterized the Jews of whatever nationality as an allied people of the United Nations (which is the name the Allies gave themselves at that time). The WJC said they wanted all Jews to be accepted as “one nation” represented by the World Jewish Congress.

 

The Riegner Telegram

Gerhart Riegner

Sensing an opportune time, on 8 Aug 1942, young Gerhart Riegner, as Secretary of the Geneva WJC office, sent a telegram to the British Foreign Office and the U.S. State Dept, through secure diplomatic channels the WJC was privy to. The telegram read:

 

Received alarming report stating that, in the Fuehrer’s Headquarters, a plan has been discussed, and is under consideration, according to which all Jews in countries occupied or controlled by Germany numbering 3½ to 4 millions should, after deportation and concentration in the East, be at one blow exterminated, in order to resolve, once and for all the Jewish question in Europe. Action is reported to be planned for the autumn. Ways of execution are still being discussed including the use of prussic acid. We transmit this information with all the necessary reservation, as exactitude cannot be confirmed by us. Our informant is reported to have close connexions with the highest German authorities, and his reports are generally reliable. Please inform and consult New York.

 

So, an anonymous report, and supposedly not the first from this ‘source’. The British Foreign Office took its time forwarding the telegram, calling for it to be investigated first, and the State Dept. was also wary. It wasn’t until 3 weeks later on 28 August that it reached Stephen Wise, WJC President in New York, who decided not to make it public. But this telegram is what the WJC and its acolytes use to say the US and UK governments knew from 1942 that Jews were being exterminated.

 

The informant in this case is the “mysterious German industrialist” that Bradley Smith wrote about and concluded did not exist. And he didn’t, until 40 years later, in October 1983 when it was claimed in the New York Times, without evidence, that he was Eduard Schulte, a mining company executive who died in 1966 in Switzerland. Twenty years after his death, the death of his first wife and one of his sons, and most who could contradict the story, Schulte is named as the ‘informer.’ Even Gerhart Riegner, a life-long WJC executive, refused to confirm Schulte for the NYTimes, reportedly using as his excuse that “I have not identified the man for 40 years and I see no reason not to keep the one request he ever made of me.” The mass of biographical and business information written in the Times article is in no way evidence for the claim—its only purpose in being there is to make it appear to those who don’t actually read that this is a big story with a lot information behind it.

 

There isn’t. There is none. But the current World Jewish Congress leadership thought it worthwhile to bolster their claim of “inside information” about extermination plans coming directly from Adolf Hitler in 1942 by supplying the name of a real person 40 years after the fact.

 

Without a source given for it, the sentence that Schulte was “the first to tell the world about the extermination of Jews” has been added to Wikipedia pages, such as here, here, here and here. This attempt to fool the public is in itself evidence that there never was an informant, that the story was an invention of Gerhart Riegner and his WJC confidants.

 

At the WJC website this article characterizes the worth of the telegram far beyond what it actually was. Note the words “reliable” and “authoritative” in the first paragraph, neither of which are at all appropriate, since it was hearsay.

 

The Making of the War Refugee Board

 

From 1942 to 1944, the World Jewish Congress continued to send messages to the State Department with information from anonymous sources about atrocities taking place against Jews in German-occupied Europe. Many were quite similar to the debunked false stories from WWI, and this was noted by State.

 

A conflict developed between the State Dept. and the U.S. Treasury Dept. headed by Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who was good friends with the leadership of the World Jewish Congress. A particular disagreement was over a plan to ship 7000 Romanian Jews to Palestine at a cost of $1200 per person. Apart from who would pay the money and how, there were British objections to admitting Jews to Palestine. The State Dept. found it problematic, while Treasury and the World Jewish Congress were pressing for the proposed project, insisting that the only alternative was death for the Jews at the hands of Hitler. From Wikipedia:

 

While the Treasury Department had granted the World Jewish Congress permission to send the money to Switzerland in July 1943, the State Department used various excuses, delaying permission until December, a full eight months after the program was first proposed.

 

Jewish newspapers like this one from Omaha, Nebraska, played it up big.

 

 

Roosevelt was eventually drawn into this State vs. Treasury friction and, because of his close friendship with Morgenthau, he backed the Treasury Dept. Just as the WJC had been pushing for, Roosevelt then agreed to assist in the escape of European Jews with the creation of the War Refugee Board in January 1944. He placed in charge Morgenthau, Sec of State Cordell Hull, and Sec of War Henry Stimson. However, the executive director was Morgenthau’s fair-haired boy John Pehle, with Josiah DuBois as general counsel, making it Morgenthau’s board.

 

Not only that, but Morgenthau had delegated all of Treasury’s powers in the areas relevant to the WRB to Harry Dexter White, later exposed as a Soviet agent. Thus, the Board became an instrument of Rabbi Wise and the Zionists, and as such its main achievement was the booklet, German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Executive Office of the President, Washington, Nov. 1944, hereinafter referred to as the WRB report.

 

 

Rudolf Vrba, born Walter Rosenberg

Alfred Wetzler, alias Jozef Lánik

 

According to revisionist Arthur R. Butz, this report constituted the birth of the official thesis of exterminations via gas chambers at Auschwitz. Once Washington committed to the claim that Auschwitz was an extermination camp, the way was cleared for newspapers to carry the story. It was placed on the front page of the New York Times on Nov. 26, 1944 with some excerpts given. It is described as two reports, one written by “two young Slovakian Jews” and the other by “a Polish major” whom had been inmates at Auschwitz from Spring 1942 until Spring 1944 when they escaped. All the essentials of the “Holocaust” are found in it.

 

You can read the Vrba-Wetzler Report in full here http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English45.pdf if you want to. But I doubt you will want to. It’s very boring as is often the case with lies. At the end the author says:

 

I soon lost my comparatively comfortable job [October 1942?] with the Aufräumungskommando, and as punishment was transferred to Birkenau, where I spent one and a half years.

 

I ask, what did a healthy young man do at Birkenau for a year and a half? It wasn’t known as a work camp. Of course, that assumes that he was actually there. Examination shows that the information in the report is the sort of thing that could have been built up from intelligence data. This is exactly what one should expect, as Germany’s enemies had the means of gathering information about German camps and about events in Europe. The Communist Party, being “the world’s most efficient intelligence organization,” could transmit any information desired to any destination without needing “escaped inmates” to supply the facts.

 

Conclusion

 

The WRB report was put into evidence at the International Military Tribunal on Dec. 14, 1945. There was no objection from the defense and it was accordingly accepted as evidence. However at the later Farben trial, the defense objected to the report, questioning the “competence and materiality of each and every document in the book” and the objection was sustained by that court.

 

It was undoubtedly the determined, even dogged efforts of the World Jewish Congress leaders and friends in pursuing the extermination thesis that paid off in the end for Jews. From the summer of 1942, “Stephen Wise had continuously campaigned for the Allied governments to take a public position directly condemning the alleged extermination of Jews in Europe.” It was J. Breckenridge Long of the State Dept. who most strongly resisted the propaganda. Long never believed the talk of extermination, and wrote that:

 

Wise always assumes such a sanctimonious air and pleads for the ‘intellectuals and brave spirits, refugees from the tortures of the dictators’ or words to that effect. Of course only an infinitesimal fraction of the immigrants are of that category – and some are certainly German agents.

 

What we can say for sure is that, in the end, the World Jewish Congress has prevailed, and that it continues to work tirelessly both for the Zionist cause of Israel and the welfare of every Jew in the world. What is one hoax more or less to them in the face of such a monumental undertaking?

 

 

 

_________________________________

 

 

Click on this text to examine websites exposing the holocaust lies.

.

.

Click on this text to visit the CODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) page.

.

.

Click in this text to meet holocaust revisionist Germar Rudolf.

.

.

Click on this text to examine the HAAVARA Transfer Agreement (The Transfer Agreement between Germany and German Jews prior to WWII).

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

JEWISH WORLD POPULATION 1938

For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers.

Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers.

Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews.

 

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/jews1933.jpg

 

 

Jewish World Population 1948

In other words, according to the World Almanac the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.
The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the official three-volume report by the International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews. The following article elaborates.

 

 

 

 

 

  A Factual Appraisal Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red Cross

The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide

 

There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.

 

This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.

 

The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.

 

The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).

 

The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.

 

Red Cross Recipients Were Jews

 

The Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).

 

In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.

 

The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).

 

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

 

No Evidence Of Genocide

 

One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).

 

Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

 

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).

 

Not All Were Interned

 

Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”

 

In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).

 

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).

 

As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.

 

The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).

 

Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.

 

A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).

 

The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”.
 
 
271,301
_____________________________________________________________________
 
 
 Regarding the quote below by Gerard Menuhin mentioning the "annihilation of millions of disarmed soldiers and innocent civilains" after the German surrender, it needs to be understood that he was referring to German soldiers and German civillians.
 
story denial 7
 
 
 

Click on this text to watch Natali Cohen Vaxberg, a radical Israeli political performance artist point out the fact that the "Holocaust" has been used to justify the Creation of Israel in 1948 and it's immoral army, the brutal and sometimes perverse persecution of Palestinians without interference from super-powers, and the creation of a nuclear weapons stockpile. BTW: a dreidel is a four-sided toy top played with during Hannukkah...

.

.

.

 

Click on this text to view: Cremation Technology vs the Holocaust...

Ernst Zundel and David Cole Discuss THE BIGGEST MYTH of the 20th and 21st Centuries AKA THE HOLOCOST

 

 

 

 

 

Click on this text to meet HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST ROBERT FARISSON.

 
 
Footage allows the viewer to see more about Professor Robert Faurisson, who is arguably the one key individual in modern revisionism who opened the door for many more questions to be asked about the historiography, the narrative of what is now called the Holocaust and open the way for many more of those who would dare to openly question the Holocaust in a serious, much more objective manner free of dogma or ideology.
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fake shower heads

One more reason why the real gas chambers
had to have real shower heads

Like all strong poisons, hydrocyanic acid (HCN)
is very good at being water-soluble – and could
have been most effectively dispensed dissolved
in boiling water – or, better still, superheated
steam – run through the real shower heads.

Moreover, while a whole can of Zyklon B was
required to kill all insects in a relatively small
fumigation chamber, hardly more than one
scoop of the Zyklon
B pellets should have
been needed to dispatch any number of
humans in a shower room of any size.

Besides, only the lethal agent HCN was
required, Zyklon
B as such was unnecessary.
This more costly compound was specifically
developed for use in fumigation chambers,
where, not unlike any other dry cleaning
process, the fumigated clothes had to be
given back dry to the inmates coming out
of the shower rooms – as the properly run
camp routine demanded.

What's more, HCN itself – highly flammable
and potentially explosive – was superfluous
to the task, as, in an enclosed space, any
volatile noxious substance – such as cheap
as rubbish ammonia, for example – is just
as deadly, but reasonably safe to handle.

As the Jews themselves very well know,
they murdered numerous Palestinians just
by firing ‘harmless’ tear gas into their houses.

The more one reads the Holohoax literature
and the closer one looks at those putative
‘gas chambers’ – the less sense they make.
And the kosher Holo-mongers themselves
are keenly aware of this.
 And hence, those
once-obligatory Jewish ‘holes in the roof’ or
the later ‘holes in the wall’ – through which
the Zyklon
B was supposedly chucked in –
are hardly ever heard of anymore.

The Jewish Holohoax is getting assimilated.
It's no longer as Jewish and hysterical as
it used to be in the 1970s-80s, in the wake
of the October
(Yom Kippur)  War (1973-4),
when little I$rael  is said to have experienced
some ‘existential angst’ (enter Madison Avenue).

In their latter-day rendition, the physical details
of this ever-apocryphal Zio narrative get to be
more and more like the Holy Ghost – positively
invisible – and never again rendered in graven
images.
 And the ‘venerable’ Anne Frank gets
to be more and more like the Holy Virgin...

(In fact, with HCN boiling point at 25.6 °C,
Zyklon
B couldn't have been used at room
temperature in fumigation chambers, either –
not without the special pulverizer/blower –
never ever mentioned in the whole
of the Holohoax literature in relation
to the putative gas chambers.)

 

 
Photo
 
 

 
 
 
In order to deprogram yourself, after an entire lifetime of incessant brainwashing by the JEW owned and controlled media, you can begin almost anywhere... such as learning exactly WHO coined the word "NAZI" - THE Most Misused Word in Any Language... see here: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id143.html
 
Here is the facts regarding JEW owned and controlled media (Hollywood and Television in particular): http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id35.html


 
 
 
____________Holocaust Revisionism Articles____________  
 
 
 

 
As Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/13/gordon-duff-who-speaks-up-for-holocaust-survivors/ 
 
 
Brighton Beach Holocaust Fund - Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years http://www.sheepsheadbites.com/2013/06/dora-grande-brighton-beach-holocaust-scam/ 
 
 
Fraudster Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme http://nypost.com/2013/11/04/fraudster-gets-8-years-in-57m-holocaust-scheme/ 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg

. . . by Lasha Darkmoon

Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures, practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing.

Nuremberg defendants(Left) German defendants at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials, 1946-1949. How many of them had their testicles crushed?

 

“The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’ obtained by the use of  torture.” So begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer.

 

At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me some stomach-churning details about testicle crushing. He ends his letter with these words : “This is what Jewish interrogators did to their German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e., to confess to crimes they never committed.”

 

I was a bit shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a great deal, nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing went on at Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been unaware that American  Jews had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers.

 

Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators, I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human depravity to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to have sex with disinterred corpses.

 

Yes, so this is something we ought to bear in mind when watching all those Hollywood movies celebrating the heroic deeds of the Allies in World War Two and lamenting the horrors of the Holocaust : that Jewish interrogators, working for the Americans, are known to have beaten, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants before charging them with war crimes at Nuremberg. Without these confessions, obtained under extreme torture, there is no solid proof that any Jewish Holocaust took place at all. There is only legend, hearsay and “eyewitness accounts” : like those of Elie Wiesel and his kind—accounts that have turned out, in retrospect, to be based on pure fantasy, fiction, and grotesque exaggeration.

 

Proponents of the official storyline say that some of the strongest evidence that “proves” the Holocaust—i.e. the systematic extermination of 6 million Jews in gas chambers on the instructions of Hitler—consists of the supposed “confessions” of the German officials who were put on trial at Nuremberg. What they neglect to tell you is that most of these confessions were obtained under extreme torture. Indeed, according to Jewish investigator John Sack, torture was often practiced for its own sake, even when there was nothing to find out. It was practiced for sheer pleasure: because it gave the torturers a ‘high’, a feeling of sadistic omnipotence, of orgasmic euphoria.

 

It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel Alexander Scotland, who ran the interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture of German POWs occurred during the war to obtain military intelligence. After the war was over, it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions of “war crimes”.

 

German POWs reported that the torture techniques included deprivation of sleep, starvation, systematic beatings, ripping hair from the scalp, menacing with red-hot pokers, threatened use of electrical devices to deliver shocks, and, finally, the worst torture of all, the slow and systematic mangling of the spermatic cords of the testicles—a procedure that had their victims thrashing about and screaming like wild animals for hours.

 

The prosecutors at Nuremberg accused and convicted the Germans of murdering some 4 million people at Auschwitz. These charges were based largely upon the supposed “confessions” obtained by the torture of German officers, such as the signed “confession” by Rudolf Hössthe commandant at Auschwitz, giving details of how he had personally supervised the murder of 2.5 million jews.

 

In 1989, however, the Soviet government reduced the claim of the number killed at Auschwitz from 4 million to 1.5 million. (See picture below). This was later reduced to 1 million.

Auch_dees

 

It became apparent at once that if only 1 million Jews had died at Auschwitz, as was now officially admitted, it no longer became possible to state that 2.5 million Jews had been killed there under Höss while he was a commandant there. The “confession” by Höss that 2.5 million Jews had been killed at Auschwitz  under his auspices was therefore worthless. It had been a confession clearly extracted under torture.

 

If, moreover, only 1 million Jews perished at Auschwitz instead of the 4 million originally claimed to have died there, it’s obvious that there has been an overestimate of three million dead Jews.  It is no longer possible to assert that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust. That becomes a mathematical impossibility. 

 

And yet, incredibly, this mathematical impossibility is brazenly asserted to this day in every mainstream media outlet.

21_52

 

We are all expected to pretend that 6 million Jews minus  3 million Jews somehow equals 6 million Jews, just as Winston Smith (in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four) was expected to believe that 2 + 2  = 5. Winston Smith, you will remember, managed to believe this absurdity in the end, with the help of a little extra tuition he received via the famous “rat torture“.        

§

The startling revelation that almost all the German defendants at Nuremberg had had their testicles crushed must make us sit up and think. How can testimonies obtained under testicle crushing be regarded in any way as reliable?

 

Following reports that defendants were tortured at the Malmedy massacre trial, the US Army formed the “Simpson Commission” to investigate the alleged misconduct.  Judge Edward L. Van Roden was part of this commission. According to Van Roden’s book, American Atrocities in Germany, out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals” who were investigated by the commission—and who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal in Dachau after World War II—”137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.” 

 

Other methods used by the American interrogators included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners and punching them in the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting them on starvation rations, and subjecting them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were then presented with prepared statements to sign. Confess or face more torture!

 

It emerged that Jewish prosecutors and interrogators had obtained complete control over the US Military tribunal that was to put German officials on trial for war crimes. This is seldom mentioned, as to do so is regarded as “anti-Semitic”. To state the unvarnished truth—that 137 Germans had their testicles mangled at Nuremberg by largely Jewish interrogators in order to obtain proof for the Holocaust—is regarded as “hate speech”.

 

perl_william

Lt. William Perl (pictured above) was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre.

This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. (See here).

 

Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. He was an ardent and active Zionist and was assisted by other Jews in his endeavors to extract confessions by the infliction of maximum pain. Jews specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg included  Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz. (See here)

 

This is what Wikipedia has to say about the interrogation of Germans at Malmedy:

 

“The accusations [against the German defendants]  were mainly based on the sworn and written statements provided by the defendants in Schwäbish Hall. To counter the evidence given in the men’s sworn statements and by prosecution witnesses, the lead defense attorney, Lieutenant Colonel Willis M. Everett tried to show that the statements had been obtained by inappropriate methods.

 

Note that exquisite euphemism: “inappropriate methods”. That’s how respectable, politically correct Americans refer to confessions obtained under torture. The methods are not described as horrendously cruel. They are not described as morally indefensible. They are described as “inappropriate”.

On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, made the following observation in which he claimed that three out of four interrogators at Nuremberg were Jewish:

 

“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he said. “You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish.”

 

One person who has made a close study of the Nuremberg trial archives in the original German and knows more about this subject than anyone else I know is the multilingual American scholar Carlos W. Porter who is fluent in German, French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Having renounced his American citizenship in 1984, and having then relocated to Belgium with his wife and children, the Holocaust revisionist author of “Not Guilty at Nuremberg” took the trouble to write to me about the Nuremberg trials in a private communication (July 28, 2015 at 9:55 pm). Porter confirmed what I had always suspected: that most of the American interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jews, and that torture had been freely practiced against the helpless Germans on trial in order to force them to confess to non-existent crimes:

 

“You can be absolutely CERTAIN,” Carlos Porter wrote to me, “that nearly ALL the interrogators and interpreters in ALL the trials were Jewish, because the Americans stamped out the German language from all American schools during WWI, so German Jewish refugees were almost the only competent people they had. Of course, other “German-Americans” could not be trusted not to be “Nazis”, so they were stuck with the German Jews.

 

That there was a great deal of mistreatment and torture in the minor trials is absolutely certain. I reproduced a couple of accounts of torture at the Dachau trials in “War Crimes Trials and Other Essays”. But I’m sure it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Minor personnel could be tortured with impunity, and 99% of them would be afraid even to mention it. It would be hard to get away with torturing somebody like Goering though.

 

There’s a lot of literature on the subject, more all the time. The Brits appear to have been surprisingly enthusiastic torturers, whether Jewish or not.”

 

Testicle crushing, incidentally, is a tried and tested method for obtaining confessions. It was used throughout the Middle Ages and particularly in France during the French Revolution. That the Jews, a scholarly race noted for their vast erudition and academic achievements, should have mastered all the techniques of testicle crushing is therefore not surprising. Their talents for acquiring such outré information must not be underestimated.

 

Though Perl had lots of German blood on his hands, he was nevertheless allowed by the Americans to serve as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg War trials. Another Jew of note at the Nuremberg war crimes trials was Richard W. Sonnenfeldt. He was the chief interpreter for American prosecutors such as Perl. He “interrogated” some of the most notorious Nazi leaders of World War II and died in 2009, age 86, at his home in Port Washington, N.Y. (See here)

 

The Presiding Judge at Nuremberg was also—coincidence?—a Jew. His name was A.H. Rosenfeld and he was a colonel in the American army. Col. Rosenfeld cheerfully admitted to torturing German prisoners of war as a matter of policy. “We couldn’t have made those birds talk otherwise,” he remarked cynically. “It was a trick, and it worked like a charm.”

 

antisemitism_Shlomo_MorelIn a recent private email to me, in response to some of my queries about torture at Nuremberg, Thomas Goodrich, acclaimed author of Hellstorm : The Death of Nazi

Germany (1944-1947), mentioned the names of four well-known Jews in the American zone whom he identified as “torturer-inquisitors” : Harry Thon, William Perl, AH Rosenfeld, and Shlomo Morel.

 

This last-named individual, Shlomo Morel (pictured right), was a particularly nasty piece of work whom Goodrich describes as follows:

 

“a vicious monster who drowned men and women in outdoor latrines, who made them eat excrement, who personally beat captives to death, and who forced women to kiss and make love with disinterred corpses.”

 

(For more grisly details, confirming all this, see here)

 

After escaping from the killing fields of Germany, where he had taken immense pleasure in dancing over mounds of corpses and shedding rivers of human blood, this cruel psychopath  “lived out his life in comfort and ease in Israel.” Yes, Israel!the final bolthole and refuge dump for many a runaway Jew fleeing the long arm of the law, a place described in a prescient comment by Adolf Hitler as early as 1925 as “a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”  (Mein Kampf, chapter 11, excerpt.)

§

Here now are some grisly details about testicle crushing that the reader may find of some interest. These distasteful details are given here only because they are relevant to our discussion. If you are of a queasy disposition and prone to easy vomiting, you are advised to skip the description and stop reading right here. Remember that all this was done to 137 Germans at Nuremberg in order to extract confessions from them with a view to establishing the “truth” about the Holocaust. Without all that testicle crushing, the Holocaust might have been much harder to prove.

 

“Standard practice [to obtain castration] in France from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution was to crush the condemned’s testicles in a vise, which burst them as mush from the scrotum, then crunch the spermatic cords with pliers. The condemned was turned upside down in order to maximize the blood flow to his brain, after which he was unable to pass out or enter a state of shock until, perhaps, the last few seconds of his ordeal.

 

The condemned was sure to vomit repeatedly with violent convulsions, even well after he had voided the contents of his stomach, but he rarely screamed except for an initial shriek, which immediately silenced, because the pain overwhelmed his ability to breathe. Most men would hang and thrash wildly during and after the crushing of each testicle, and their thrashing would renew upon the crushing of each spermatic cord.

 

This torture method (accompanied by others) was usually reserved for the crime of regicide or attempted regicide. The condemned was mercifully put to death afterwards, but his torture routinely lasted for the better part of a day, witnessed by large crowds. It is interesting to note that, whereas most crowds were instructed to jeer, mock, and ridicule the condemned, and did so even during a disemboweling, and drawing and quartering, most crowds remained silent and stared with shocked expressions as a castration was carried out in this manner.

 

Onlookers, male and female, are recorded to have vomited at the sight of the spectacle.

Yes, they certainly knew what they were doing at Nuremberg! They were the experts.

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
https://cigpapers.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/pic0121.jpg
 


 
 
 
 
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 19 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19
 
>The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value. 
 
 
 
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 21 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21
 
>The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various  allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations. 
 
 
 
 

 
The “Six Million” Myth http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=24369

 
 
 
 
Zyklon-B and the German Delousing Chambers http://www.nazigassings.com/zyklondelousing.html
 
 
 
 
 —————————————————————————————————————————————  
 
____Holocaust Revisionism Documentaries and Videos___
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Buchenwald a Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcLzTlfJNB4 
 
Ernst Zundel – Holocaust Debunked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp85rXHDJCo  
 
Zundel vs. Zionist – Truth vs. Lies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Myxi92m4U 
 
 
Holocaust Faker Explains Himself https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j30sWIOMIak 
 
The Holocaust Lie by David Irving https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk 
 
Holocaust Revisionism: The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Li4o4JCW0To 
 
The Holocaust Testimonies You Didn’t Hear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtlPlZGvgY0 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Made in Russia: The Holocaust – Carlos W. Porter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWJRBbCYjp8 
 
The Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx9G4zmpKv
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Sylvia Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmdw 
 
Spielberg’s Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8 
 
 

 

 
 
 
—————————————————————————————————————————————  
 

 
 

 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

Ordered To Be Silent

 

Recite the Jews’ version of history

or face gag orders and/or jail time

 

The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth.

That makes the idea that you are living in a free country a willful delusion

from which no competent decisions about anything may be made.

 

 

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://johnkaminski.org

 

 

You are no longer allowed to tell a story that is not approved by the Jews, especially if it involves holy Holocaust defamation. Like a spreading stain of darkness slowly asphyxiating the minds of everyone on Earth, the monstrous judicial invention that “truth is no defense” has unleashed the worst possible future upon our lemming-like human species.

 

People are being snatched off the streets for daring to analyze their country’s provably criminal history. A woman lampooning a well-known ethnic group is ordered to stay off the Internet for a year. And anyone who dares speak critically about Jews in public, after first having their character assassinated by a huffy Jewish spokesperson, is likely to be arrested by a very real thought police.

 

The stain of darkness has spread much further than you may have thought, but a quick scan of the literature that has not yet been completely erased by Amazon and the other Jewish mind erasers reveals the public knew more 80 years ago about the problem that has poisoned all life on this planet than we do today.

 

Those who claim to be involved in the quest for justice should take this assessment to heart, for the time is running out for humanity’s best qualities as they are steadily being erased by crazies who know nothing of compassion, humanity or justice.

 

Revisionists are telling the truth

 

You know the revisionists are telling the truth, that Holohoax is the proper term for all this Jewish Holocaust hysteria, because you know by now — if you are even remotely conscious — that your government is lying about everything it does, so if it says the Holocaust was real, you’d automatically know it is lying to you . . . again . . . and still.

 

For instance, our government says it is fighting ISIS in Syria, and then we learn it is funding ISIS in Syria through such third party operatives as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. This not the first time this has happened. America’s longest war is now Afghanistan, and the same principles are at work. The U.S. trains and funds the very people it is supposed to be fighting. We trained the mujahadeen and they became al-Qaeda, paid by our Pentagon to be both friend and foe.

 

The purpose of all these tragic invasions is the same. In Afghanistan, 17 years of military adventurism and many thousands of lives were spent to protect the poppy crop, providing fuel for the cycle of depravity that funnels drugs to the streets, children into prison, and profits from slave labor. In Syria, it’s the oil in the Golan Heights which Israel is already stealing.

 

The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth. That makes the idea that you are living in a free country a willful delusion from which no competent decisions about anything may be made.

 

The only thing Jews fear is the truth.

 

That’s why all these white countries that have been taken over by Jews are slamming people into jail for challenging the bogus Jewish version of history. Unfortunately — due to Jews owning the majority of media outlets around the world — the majority of the people in the world tend to believe their well-distributed propaganda.

 

Like the official story of 9/11 that has long since fallen apart, or the now-debunked lies about the invasion of Libya, which led to the mass invasion of migrants in Europe. Jew puppets Hillary and Obama were responsible for the tragic debasement of Europe, which they triggered by their criminal assassination of Libya and its beloved leader.

 

One hundred years of evidence clearly reveals that the Jews tell the truth about nothing, but nothing they have done matches the lies they have told about what they did to the Germans during World War II.

 

These lies, and the twisted laws they have spawned, are inexorably strangling every country on Earth, and every person on this planet. These laws prevent the perpetrators from humanity’s greatest crimes from ever being apprehended, charged and convicted — because it would be anti-Semitic.

 

Zombie Germany

 

No one who knows the real history of the 20th century dares to travel to Germany — or any European Union nation —  anymore. They will be slammed into prison for harboring unacceptable thoughts. 

 

As we speak Lady Michelle Renouf, attempting to attend the kangaroo court trial of the Schaeffer siblings, fears suffering the same fate as Monika Schaeffer, the Canadian fiddle player who made a humorous YouTube about her mother and the Holocaust, went to Germany to visit her brother Alfred, and then was promptly snatched by the Holohoax police and slammed into prison with no charges for many months.

 

She and her brother Alfred are in court this week, with their futures not bright and on the line.

 

This is banana republic garbage. In Germany there is no liberty or justice for those who understand the worldwide Jewish mind scam. Now that Merkel has set the Africans free in Germany, one can no longer expect any justice there. Renouf has to skulk around Stuttgart clandestinely lest she be arrested by Jewish thugs and funneled off to jail for yet another trial.

 

And now for the first time, this mind virus has spread to England, where for the first time a man has been jailed for daring to insist on the true facts of history. 

 

Jew cops in England

 

Jeremy Bedford-Turner — a.k.a. Jez Turner — was sentenced to 12 months for a 2015 speech he gave criticizing a Jewish organization known as Shomrim, which is essentially a Jewish police force that works closely with local police.

 

Prior to Turner’s hasty conviction, Andrew Joyce wrote:

 

Bear in mind that the Crown Prosecution Service has already told Gideon Falter—not once, but several times—that Jez Turner has committed no crime. If Jez is now found “guilty” on some trumped-up charge, the Crown Prosecution Service will not only lose all credibility but the world will see for itself that Jez was right all along when he allegedly said: “All politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune.”

https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/the-trial-of-jez-turner-a-jewish-witch-hunt/ 

 

Writer Robert Henderson wrote, 

 

But even with a jury the odds were heavily against a not guilty verdict. In the minds of jurors must be the fear of being called a racist, a fear which has been so successfully inculcated in the general population that it produces an automated reflex of panic and terror when faced with the possibility of the label being stuck on them. Any juror faced with a case such as this must have in the back of their minds that to return a not guilty would be to risk being called a racist. There is also the sheer shock factor of hearing politically incorrect views being unashamedly spoken. As it was the jury was out for less than two hours and returned a unanimous version of guilty.

https://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2018/05/17/the-ever-narrowing-range-of-permitted-opinion-in-england/

 

Long ago we knew more than we know now

 

Before World War II started, one observer wrote:

 

The press has degenerated under Jewish control and influence into lying propaganda agencies whose chief mission appears to be to deceive and befuddle the people. In Protocol 12 the Elders of Zion say of the Press:

 

“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

— George Armstrong, The Rothschild Money Trust, 1940, p.47

 

This Protocol was written before 1905. Seventy-eight years after this was written, the modern world has much less an idea that Jews control everything, and the laws across Europe that prevent debunking all these obvious Jewish lies are swallowing up people trying to point out the truth of history one valiant martyr at a time.

 

Jews can’t prove 6 million died, but we can prove 273,000 died, not all of them Jews, in the German labor camps.

 

To think of all the false Jewish stories about fake Holocaust stories told by pathetic wretches in search of celebrity is to contemplate the spectrum of human psychological disorders.

 

So, the long and short of it is, you may not even think about a story that affects Jews negatively, because this has been determined to be a crime against the state.

 

Perhaps you can think of other things that the Jews appear to be out to take from you, beyond your ability to think for yourself.

 

 

 

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise.
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 

British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history. A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history. A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history. A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history. A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


Greetings ladies and gentlemen. A few days ago an article about your humble author appeared at the Holocaust Controversies blog written by a certain Hans Metzner. Titled Panagiotis Heliotis - The New Star Shining in the Revisionist Coffin?


This is the last of a series of parts on the same topic. And what a topic that is! If you have missed the previous parts you can find them here or on our You Tube Channel. 

 

 

 _____________________________________________________________________

 

 

Review of Auschwitz Forensically Examined


Auschwitz—Forensically Examined by Cyrus Cox summarizes the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp. This article will review some of the important points mentioned in this book.

 

The Chemistry of Auschwitz

 

Forensic tests show that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue, a compound of cyanide and iron readily discernible by a distinctive deep blue color. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing facilities have Prussian Blue staining. On the other hand, nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[1]

 

Cyrus Cox writes:

 

While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all… The simplest explanation for this is that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, plain and simple.[2]

 

Proponents of the orthodox Holocaust story, however, cannot concede that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged-homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. They have made the following attempts to explain away the results of forensic tests showing no significant cyanide residues in the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:[3]

 

1)   The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that claimed not to have understood how it was possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen-cyanide gas. The researchers therefore adopted methods that excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron/cyanide compounds from their analyses. Their assumptions made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a “cyanide residue” of close to zero. The Kraków researchers concluded from their deliberately crippled analyses that, since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all had similar amounts of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[4]

 

Cox dismisses this Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:

 

The cockeyed blabber about not understanding or about blue wall paint is egregious flimflam at best; in reality, however, it is a lie to confuse the audience.[5]

 

2)   Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as the laboratory manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply into porous materials such as brick and iron.[6]

 

Dr. Roth later changed this testimony in a 1999 movie titled Mr. Death produced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:

 

Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[7]

 

Cox writes in regard to Dr. Roth’s statement in Mr. Death:

 

That was a lie. To hydrogen-cyanide gas, plaster and mortar are as permeable as a sponge is to water… Roth knows this, because when he testified under oath at the 1988 Zündel trial, he truthfully said: ‘In porous materials such as brick and mortar, [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open’…[8]

 

3)   Dr. Richard Green, who says “I am not embarrassed to call Holocaust denial hate speech,” agrees with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassing with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers have blue staining. Green writes:

 

[T]he discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible processes could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.[9]

 

Cox writes concerning Dr. Green’s statement:

 

Which absurd auxiliary thesis will come next? Maybe the one by Dr. Richard Green, who seriously proposed that the cyanide residues in the disinfestation chambers did not stem from fumigations, but were caused by objects leaning against the wall which had been soaked in a “hydrogen-cyanide solution”? Where then do the cyanide residues close to the ceiling, in the middle and outside of the wall come from?[10]

 

4)   French biochemist and Auschwitz veteran Dr. Georges Wellers provides another explanation by stating that humans are considerably more sensitive to hydrogen cyanide than insects. The homicidal gassings at Auschwitz/Birkenau thus were conducted with smaller amounts of hydrogen cyanide over shorter times. Wellers says the victims would have inhaled almost all of the hydrogen cyanide, so there presumably was nothing left to react with the masonry.[11]

 

Cox writes that Wellers’s explanation overlooks several things:

 

  1. Executions in U.S. gas chambers took on average around nine minutes before the victims were dead;

  2. The Zyklon B used in Auschwitz/Birkenau slowly discharges its toxin over a period of one to two hours, in contrast to US methods, in which a cyanide “egg” virtually “boils” in a pot of pure sulfuric acid;

  3. None of the alleged-homicidal gas chambers used in Auschwitz/Birkenau had devices such as warm-air blowers to aid evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide. Such devices were part of the standard equipment of the disinfestation chambers used in that period (the gas chambers are said to have used precisely the same form of Zyklon B as did the disinfestation chambers);

  4. The concentration of toxic gas in the chambers would have steadily increased for one or two hours; therefore, ventilation of the chamber before the complete evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide would have been of no avail; and
  5. The victims before dying could have inhaled only an insignificant part of the hydrogen-cyanide gas that would have been in the homicidal gas chambers.[12]

Cox lists several additional factors indicating that the alleged-homicidal gas chambers had a significantly higher tendency of forming long-term-stable cyanide residue than the disinfestation buildings. He concludes:

 

In the masonry samples of the underground morgue, we should find approximately similar residues as in the disinfestation chambers, if not even more, provided that the stories told by the witnesses are true.[13]

 

The Cremations of Auschwitz

 

Cyrus Cox debunks eyewitness testimony claiming that gigantic flames burst from the chimneys of the crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau. The construction blueprints show that the flues and the chimney of the largest crematories in Auschwitz/Birkenau each had a length of about 15 meters. The coke and coal used to fuel the furnaces burn with a short flame not exceeding half a meter. This fuel could not even have produced flames that protruded out of the cremation muffles.[14] 

 

Many witnesses also claim that smoke constantly covered all of Auschwitz/Birkenau. However, none of the aerial photos taken of Birkenau by Allied reconnaissance planes since late May 1944 shows a column of smoke from any of the crematories. This is so even though these facilities were allegedly cremating the Jews deported from Hungary at their peak capacity.[15]

 

The capacity of the Auschwitz/Birkenau crematories has also been exaggerated by proponents of the official Holocaust story. The crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau had muffles with doors 1.97 feet in width and height, and were meant to cremate only one corpse at a time without casket. The full incineration of a single corpse took about an hour.[16] If one considers that the furnace had to be cleaned daily from ash and cinders, a coke-fired crematory could be operated for a maximum of only about 20 hours per day.[17]

 

There effectively were never more than 38 cremation muffles concurrently operating at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Their theoretical maximum daily capacity on a 20-hour-per-day operational schedule amounts to:

 

38 muffles x 20 hours x 1 corpse/hour = 760 corpses.

 

Since single furnaces or even complete crematories had to be shut down on occasion for necessary repairs, and since the furnaces were often operated by unskilled detainees, one can assume that the actual cremation capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau was significantly lower.[18] There was never enough capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau to cremate 4,800 corpses per day as alleged by pro-Holocaust historians.[19]

 

A set of documents has been preserved showing the quantities of coke delivered to Auschwitz/Birkenau in the period from February 1942 to October 1943. These documents show that the new crematories at Birkenau weren’t used as intensively as the old one at the Auschwitz main camp, and that there was not enough fuel delivered to cremate the additional hundreds of thousands of corpses claimed to have accrued at Auschwitz/Birkenau. These documents also show that coke deliveries starting in March 1943 approximately match the numbers of dead reported in the Auschwitz/Birkenau Death Books. [20]

 

Cox does acknowledge that approximately 13,000 corpses were buried in mass graves in Birkenau in 1942 because deaths from a typhus epidemic exceeded the limited cremation capacity in the camp at the time. Most of these bodies were later exhumed, with many bodies probably directly burned on pyres.[21] However, Cox says a photograph taken of Birkenau on May 31, 1944 provides irrefutable proof that the alleged incineration of Hungarian Jews on enormous outdoor pyres has been nothing other than a gigantic propaganda lie.[22]

 

Carlo Mattogno agrees with Cox’s analysis. In his book Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Mattogno states in regard to Allied aerial photographs taken at Birkenau on May 31, 1944:

 

It is pointed out also that the aerial photographs taken by the Allied military on 31 May 1944, at the crucial time of presumed extermination, on the day of the arrival at Birkenau of about 15,000 deportees, and after 14 days of intense arrivals (184,000 deportees, averaging 13,000 per day) and with an extermination toll (according to Pressac’s hypothesis) of at least 110,000 homicidally gassed, which would have had to average 7,800 per day, every single day for 14 consecutive days; after all of that, the photographs do not show the slightest evidence of this alleged enormous extermination: No trace of smoke, no trace of pits, crematory or otherwise, burning or not, no sign of dirt extracted from pits, no trace of wood set aside for use in pits, no sign of vehicles or any other type of activity in the crucial zones of the courtyard of Crematory V nor in the earth of Bunker 2, nor in Crematories II and III. These photographs constitute irrefutable proof that the story of extermination of the Hungarian Jews is historically unfounded.[23]     

                

Suppressing Evidence

 

Cox describes the first independent forensic report on Auschwitz:

 

In 1972, the two architects Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl, who were involved in the planning and construction of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau, had to stand trial in Vienna for assisting in mass murder. The Auschwitz Museum had sent the Viennese court the construction plans of these buildings. Because the judges found themselves incompetent to evaluate these plans, they tasked the Viennese architect Gerhard Dubin, a certified engineer, to examine these designs to ascertain whether the spaces denoted by the Auschwitz Museum as execution chambers could have been used as such or could have been restructured for such use. Dubin answered “No” to both questions in his expert report. This was one of the reasons why both defendants were ultimately acquitted by the jury. Subsequently, an unknown person removed Dubin’s embarrassing (for the orthodoxy) expert report from the trial records, because today it is not to be found there. This destruction of evidence is not only grossly anti-scientific, it is also a criminal act.[24]

 

The Holocaust orthodoxy continues to suppress evidence to this day. Publicly disputing the official Holocaust narrative is a crime in some 19 countries. Moreover, in Germany it is prohibited by threat of punishment to file a motion with the court to admit evidence seeking to prove that revisionist statements are correct. The reason given is that such motions constitute “Holocaust denial” and would therefore be a criminal act during a public trial. Accordingly, several defense lawyers have been sentenced simply because they filed such a motion.[25] 

 

Holocaust revisionist writings cannot even be read in court in modern-day Germany. Cox writes:

 

In order to keep the public in the dark about the fact that the defendants are being sent to the dungeon for entirely harmless and scientifically well-based statements, their writings for which they are on trial are moreover not read out in the courtroom, which would normally be obligatory, but the trial participants—judges, prosecution, defense—are ordered to read the material by themselves at home.

 

Ever since the introduction of these measures, silence has been once more every citizen’s primary duty in German courtrooms. Shut up, and don’t you dare protest![26]     

     

Conclusion

 

Auschwitz—Forensically Examined provides an excellent introduction to the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz/Birkenau was not an extermination camp. Readers who are interested in a more detailed analysis of the forensic evidence can read books written by Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno to gain additional insights. 

 

Cyrus Cox states the primary reason for knowing that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau: “While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all.”[27] Pro-Holocaust historians have yet to provide a credible explanation why no significant presence of cyanide residue has been found in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.

 

Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes: “…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’t happen.”[28]    

 

 

Endnotes


[1] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.

[2] Cox, Cyrus, Auschwitz—Forensically Examined, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2019, pp. 41, 53.

[3] Ibid., p. 41.

[4] Rudolf, Germar. op. cit., pp. 368-369.

[5] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 40.

[6] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers  Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.

[7] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, David John Cawdell Irving  v. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf.

[8] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 42.

[9] Richard J. Green. “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, p. 18. http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/.

[10] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 54.

[11] Ibid., p. 42.

[12] Ibid., pp. 42-45.

[13] Ibid., pp. 45-47.

[14] Ibid., pp. 57-58.

[15] Ibid., pp. 59-60.

[16] Ibid., pp. 61-62.

[17] Ibid., pp. 64-65.

[18] Ibid., p. 66.

[19] Ibid., p. 61.

[20] Ibid., pp. 67, 70-71.

[21] Ibid., pp. 69-70.

[22] Ibid., p. 84.

[23] Mattogno, Carlo. Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Newport Beach, Cal.: The Institute for Historical Review, 1994, p. 32.

[24] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., pp. 21-22.

[25] Ibid., pp. 92-94.

[26] Ibid., p. 95.

[27] Ibid., p. 41.

[28] Kollerstrom, Nicholas. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

DEBUNKING THE MYTH OF DR. MENGELE

 

 By Mike King

 

Of the many sub-fables spun off of the grand fable of “Auschwitz ,” the most shocking and enduring is the myth of that evil, sadistic, mass-murdering monster whose name ranks behind only those of Adolf Hitler and SS Chief Heinrich Himmler on the all-time scary dude list. The notorious camp doctor known for conducting live invasive experiments on Jewish inmates has long since been immortalized in articles, books and films. You know the name – none other than the big bad Dr. Josef Mengele (cue dramatic piano music) -- aka "The Angel of Death ." (cue even more dramatic piano music)

There is, however, just a wee little problem with this official narrative of the big bad Mengele.. To put it bluntly, just like those long-since discredited tales of shrunken heads, lamp shades & soap made from dead Jews, “zee gas chambers ,” and babies being tossed into open fire-pits – the Myth of Mengele is, well, bullshit from start to finish!

 

Mengele-Mania has generated lots of shekels for lots of writers and film makers.

Image result for mengele Image result for BOYS FROM BRAZIL

*

Image result for mengele books

  *

 

The Three Biggest Lies About Dr. Mengele

1.   He condemned inmates who could not work to death in the gas chambers

2.   He conducted cruel experiments with twins.

3.   He conducted other cruel medical experiments on random inmates

 

Let us debunk:

 

1. Mengele and the Gas Chambers

This one is easy because we absolutely know, for certain, that there were no gas chambers at Bullschwitz or any other internment camp! If you’re new to “Holocaust Denial ,” here are a pair of powerful pieces (to read later) which will – unless you are in deep denial – forever dispel the silly notion of “zee gas chambers ” (here & here). Hence, how could Dr. Mengele have condemned people to die in "gas chambers " that never even existed?

 

Image result for gas chambers hoax Image result for holocaust hoax books breaking the spell

The "gas chambers" lie has been debunked so thoroughly that Amazon had to be pressured by "the usual suspects" into banning many books about the Holohoax and World War II.
 
 

2. Mengele and Experiments on Twins

If the alleged experiments Mengele is alleged to have performed with twins were so cruel and deadly (like sewing twin babies together in an attempt to artificially create conjoined “Siamese Twins!” --- ha ha ha ha ha -- yeah, right!), then how were most of the twins enrolled in his research able to survive the war and then, in 1984, form an association which still lobbies for their interests? The organization / museum is named “CANDLES” (Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiment Survivors). In fact, they, their descendants and their advocates are still raking in shekels off of Mengele's wrongly tarnished name (cha ching!). (here)

Now just focus on the name of that organization for a bit and ask yourself: How the frickety-frack can “deadly lab experiments” leave any so many "survivors?" The evidence – or lack thereof – is very clear: Mengele did not commit any crimes on the Jewish twins. An anthropologist in addition to being a physician, Mengele's research was limited to behavioral / observational studies only – nothing surgical.

Image result for mengele Image result for CANDLES&amp;rdquo; (Children of Auschwitz 

1. Twins Jiri and Josef Fiser were studied by Mengele, and "survived" to tell tales about it. // 2  & 3: Twin Eva Kor gives speeches on how she "survived" Mengele.

 

3. Mengele Randomly Conducted Other Cruel Experiments

The “eyewitness” testimony as to the medically senseless and cruel experiments supposedly performed by Mengele (changing eye colors by dye injections, removing healthy teeth just for the fun of it, transplanting organs to random places in the body -- ha ha ha ha ha --yeah, right!) ring as absurd and untrue as stories of shrunken heads and lamp shades. But because the “survivors ” have been sainted, none dare to question them.

Interestingly, the “victims” of these monstrous experiments, never showed any signs of these cruel procedures. There was never even the slightest bit of evidence to support the claims of these “survivors” --  no documents, no autopsies. Nothing!

Image result for mengele experiments Image result for mad dentists

1. Mengele also studied dwarfism. Above, the 7 dwarfs of the Ovitz family. // 2. Tales of Mad Mengele torturing Jews by ripping out healthy teeth just for his amusement are totally without basis, and not even worth rebutting.

 

Who Really was Josef Mengele?

 

Before the war, the brilliant Mengele, after studying philosophy, went on to earn doctorates in anthropology and medicine. His main career focus was as a researcher – hence, the observation of twins, dwarfs and others at Auschwitz. During the war, Mengele was awarded the Iron Cross 2nd Class, and then an Iron Cross 1st Class for his bravery in rescuing two men from a burning tank. After being seriously wounded in action on the eastern front in 1942, he was declared unfit for active service and then transferred to Auschwitz where he served as a doctor and researcher.

Now, here’s the kicker. Dr. Mengele, as one of the lead physicians in a camp afflicted from time to time with outbreaks of typhus, worked tirelessly to save lives – not take them! The Zyklon B “gas” was a pesticide used to kill lice, not people. Furthermore, under the jurisdiction of Mengele, and other camp doctors, an estimated 3000 Jewish babies were born and cared for at Auschwitz. True story, boys and girls. Read "The Auschwitz Baby Boom" (here)

 

Image result for A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at AuschwitzImage result for A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at Auschwitz Image result for mengele experiments

1. Drawing depicts Dr. Eduard Wirths -- an Auschwitz doctor and colleague of Mengele's -- as a valiant knight waging battle against deadly typhus-carrying lice. // 2. SS officers at Auschwitz. From left to right: Richard Baer, Josef Mengele, Josef Kramer, Rudolf Höss // 3. Many of the Jewish babies born at Auschwitz "survived" and lived long lives.

 

About four years after the end of the war, Mengele, a true-believing SS man, escaped to Argentina -- where he lived for about 10 years while working as a carpenter. He then fled to Paraguay in 1959 and Brazil in 1960. Now a most-wanted fugitive, Mengele was being hunted by the United States, West Germany, Israel, and independently by the hideous “Nazi hunter,” Simon Wiesenthal of "babies in the bon-fire" fame. He eluded capture in spite of extradition requests by the West German government and covert operations by Israel’s Mossad.

 

Headline: New York Times (May 11, 1985)

Three Nations Joining to Hunt Mengele 

By Ralph Blumenthal (cough cough)

(here)

The article as it originally appeared.  Image result for mengele wanted
In time, the hate-filled psychopaths came to believe their own dirty lies about noble Dr. Mengele -- Image 1: NY Slimes front page story // Image 2: Lots of shekels were offered to locate Dr. Mengele.

 

 

Unbeknown to his hunters at the time -- the good doctor, philosopher, anthropologist, decorated war hero, gentleman, scholar, humanitarian and carpenter died in 1979, at the age of 67, after suffering a stroke while swimming off the coast in Brazil. (Or did Mossad finally get him "on the down low?") He was buried under a fake name. According to his only child, his son, Rolf, Dr. Mengele maintained his innocence until the end. We totally believe him. And, given all the other lies we’ve been fed about everything else related to The Bad War -- you should too.

 

 _______________________________________________________________

 

 

How Danuta Czech Invented 100,000 Gassing Victims

An Analysis of the Auschwitz Chronicle – Part 1: 1942

 
 
 

Abstract

Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle are one of the most important secondary sources on the history of the Auschwitz Camp.[1] The information found in it is a major basis for a large body of literature dealing with the Auschwitz Camp. All the more important it is, then, to verify whether the data contained in it is accurate. The following paper looks into the reliability of data contained in the Chronicle dealing with mass deportations mainly of Jews[2] from all over Europe to Auschwitz in 1942. It compares the data contained in the primary sources quoted by Czech with what Czech herself claims about them.

 

 

Previous Research

Already in 1994, the Spanish revisionist Enrique Aynat published a booklet that contains a critical article on the way Danuta Czech determined the fate of the Jews deported from France and Belgium to Auschwitz in 1942.[3] He pointed out that the only source Czech relied upon regarding arrivals at Auschwitz were handwritten lists of registration numbers assigned to the deportees which were clandestinely compiled by inmates and smuggled out of the camp in 1944. These lists contain the date of an arriving transport, the registration numbers assigned to male and female deportees, and in many but not all cases the location whence these transports had come. It is not known how reliable these lists are. After all, they were compiled by individuals naturally hostile to their captors. It is important to emphasize, however, that these lists do not contain any information about inmates arriving at the camp who were not registered, and if such deportees existed, what their fates were.

 

Extant documents from the German wartime authorities in France, Belgium and the Netherlands are more detailed about the persons deported to Auschwitz, since among them are lists containing not only the exact number of deportees sent to Auschwitz with every transpo