It is only until we stop being so polite, gentlemanly, nice and
euphemistic when defining our enemy
that we will
begin to make progress in making this a better world.
It's actually past time to start
naming the Jews, expose them for what they have done and stop using euphemisms that only confuse the issue.
By ARCH STANTON
Jews have stolen everything.
They’ve stolen our faith.
They’ve stolen our future.
They’ve stolen the Aryan values bequeathed to us by our
our health, welfare and happiness, replacing them with debilitating pharmaceuticals that drive us mad.
of all, they’ve stolen our happiness. Our sense of well being, with the constant confusion of phony “progress”
that has torn up our neighborhoods to the point that we can no longer recognize or feel comfortable living in them.
They’ve stolen our media — every last bit of it.
They’ve stolen our wealth with their Federal Reserve.
They’ve stolen our sunshine with their deadly chemtrails.
They’ve stolen our pure
water, befouling it with deadly chemicals.
stolen our children, sacrificing them on their media’s altar in howling bloodlust.
They’ve stolen our truths, our justice, our American
mocking our loss with a televised, cardboard, comic book
Jews have stolen our past; and those who have stolen our past, have stolen the future also.
All the Jews have left us with is this: a miserable, tenuous
—and soon they shall finish stealing our lives
Then they shall wallow through their global, Jewish
pigsty like the “effendi” pigs they are,
remaining mud-race slaves to serve them.
One can only pray to a Jewish god (((they))) cannot steal our
If there ever was a reason to hate a race, it’s
the people of hate — the Jews.
If you happen to be a lying, thieving, conniving, murdering,
Jewish psychopath, the future looks bright – very bright.
you happen to be anyone else, your future looks dim. Very dim.
have stolen everything, so what is left for them to steal?
When did success ever stop a thief? With each succeeding generation,
the Jews’ power has grown ever stronger.
The Russians did not stop the Jews.
The Germans did not stop the
Kings and queens have not stopped the Jews.
Presidents have not stopped the Jews.
has not stopped the Jews,
Liberals have not stopped the Jews.
Conservatives have not stopped the Jews.
YOU don’t stop the Jews — no one will!
"They clearly show that you are afraid to write the J word. And they know how to deal with frightened
The original title
of this article was: 'The "Globalists" Love Gefilte Fish'. The author is Jewish.
Our grandparents faced a quandary when they had to describe
some body parts or physical activity. The ‘obscene words’ remained taboo at least until D.H. Lawrence broke
the prohibition in Lady Chatterley’s Lover, and the four-letter words became printable only recently.
However, now we have new banned words, or words one can use only at one’s own peril.
is such a word. Speaking about the Jews is fraught with consequences. Jews do not like to be referred to, unless in extremely
flattering terms. You are likely to be banned in Facebook and other social networks for referring to ‘Jews’.
You can be fired. Even a hundred years ago it was a troublesome step, likely to cause social ostracism.
Therefore, there is a permanent demand
is an early and enduring euphemism of the 19th century which is still with us thanks to “anti-Semitism”.
The Clergy prefer to write ‘Masons’ instead of ‘Jews’.
‘Khazar’ or ‘Khazarian’ is popular in the networks,
thanks to Arthur Koestler, the author of The Thirteenth Tribe. He claimed modern Jews were the descendants of the Turkic
Khazars who were Judaised in 12th century.
nickname ‘Ashkenazi’ originally referred to the Jews of Central Europe; the East European Jews of Lithuanian
and Ukrainian origin gladly accepted it despite the German Jews’ objections. Nowadays it is just an euphemism for
a Jew, with an extra bonus: not-very-prominent (outside trade and money) Oriental Jews will gladly join in Ashkenazi denunciation.
- ‘Zionist’ is a popular term of use and abuse, as in “Jews are fine, it
is Zionists whom I dislike”.
or ‘Illuminati’ are the words used when all the rest fail.
There is one big problem with these words. They clearly show that you are afraid to write the
J word. And they know how to deal with frightened persons. It is enough to murmur in response, “It’s an antisemitic
slur”, and the guy will collapse in a paroxysm of denial. There is a second problem: it makes very little sense to
call the Bolshevik Jews “Zionists.”
The Jews themselves have proposed a few euphemisms of their own: ‘Hebrews’ or ‘Israelites’
were the preferred ones, but they didn’t make much inroad in the English-speaking world. However, ‘Hebrews’
became the official designation of Jews in Russia, while the ‘Jews’ moniker had been outlawed, though it survived
in Poland and the Ukraine.
Now the US has produced a new word: “globalists.” The Huffington Post called the tweet of Donald Trump
about the dismissal of “globalist Gary Cohen” – anti-Semitic. It turns out that a “globalist”
is just a Jew. For example, globalists like gefilte fish.
This neologism pleased Ann Coulter, and she amused her numerous readers with her tweets: “Paul
Newman is only half globalist,” “How many globalists came under the distribution in the fight against male assault
and harassment!”, “Israel is the last refuge of globalists.” These Tweets received thousands of likes and
reposts, and caused an angry condemnation … of globalists.
Mahmud Abbas, the president of Palestine, created an euphemism accidentally.
He called the US Ambassador to Israel a “son of a bitch”, and His Excellence Right Honourable Ambassador David Friedman
said it is was an “antisemitic slur”.
A propos, the creation of euphemisms is a very Jewish way to deal with taboos. At
first, the Jews banned the Name of God יהוה, and then they banned the substitute, and the substitute
of the substitute, and the substitute of the substitute of the substitute. Nowadays, the religious Jews refer to ‘God’
in writing in an oblique way.
The whole of political correctness (PC) grew out of extrapolating this Jewish attitude to other groups. In the PC
culture, the word ‘Negro’ was displaced by “Black”, and then by ‘black’ in low case,
and then by “Afro-American”. Thus PC had created a new fence around the ban.
The idea of fences is another Jewish
concept. A Jew is forbidden to pick fruit on the Sabbath. Fine! Then, the Jews created a fence around this prohibition forbidding
the climbing of an apple tree on the Sabbath. The idea is: if you climb on an apple tree, you may be tempted to pick an
apple. And then they built another fence, forbidding the climbing of any tree one the Sabbath. Otherwise, you’ll get
used to climbing a pine on the Sabbath, and one day you’ll climb an apple tree.
PC is this additional fence. If today you refer to a black person,
tomorrow you will be tempted to refer to Jews. And if you refer to Jews, perhaps you will do so in unflattering terms. The
concept of micro-insults and micro-aggressions completes the fence.
And now we have a new fence: a reference to ‘bankers’,
‘moneylenders’ and even ‘globalists’ has become forbidden, as in the case of George Soros. The Hungarians
referred to him as a “globalist banker” and the Jewish world rushed to his defense. Not that he is liked by his
fellow Jews, he isn’t, but they have to fight the breach in the fence. You know the logic: today you call Soros ‘’a
globalist’, and tomorrow you will call a Jew – a Jew.
President Putin did just that. In an interview with Megyn Kelly, he
answered her question about the 13 Russians who were indicted by Mueller for alleged interference in the elections: “They
do not represent the interests of the Russian state. Maybe they are not Russians, but Ukrainians, Tatars, Jews with Russian
citizenship. Check it out.”
He was attacked ferociously. The leading Jewish organization ADL (Anti-Defamation League) referred
to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (this is their standard response whenever a Jew is mentioned), and added, “Don’t
you dare blame the Jews for interfering in American elections!”
This is especially piquant – if there is a foreign country that actively interferes
in the US politics and elections, it is primarily the Jewish state and its supporters. American friends of Israel, Sheldon
Adelson and Jeff Katzenberg are the largest donors; and in general Jews spent more money on presidential elections in the
US than on helping needy Jews. Israeli diplomats are actively interfering in American elections at all levels, as the Jewish
website Mondoweiss writes. But you can mention that only in marginal publications on the verge of a ban from Google and Twitter.
And in Israel, the energetic young MK Xenia
Svetlova, (a Knesset Member for the Zionist Union), accused Putin of anti-Semitism and called upon Netanyahu to ‘protect
the Jews’. It’s nothing personal – Xenia grew up in Moscow, worked for Russian TV channels, even loved
Russia, but when she went into politics, she had to prove that she was not a Putin stooge. And she calls for Israeli intervention
in Syria against Assad and Putin, and for the condemnation of Putin’s anti-Semitism.
The Tatars and Ukrainians did not resent Putin’s words. The Russian Jews in Russia dismissed it, too. For
a good reason: the taboo on the word ‘Jew’ is not universal. It does not exist in Russia. Russia is the land
of many native ethnicities, a hundred and fifty or so, from Yakut to Mordva, and people freely refer to all of them without
fear. The Jews in Russia are just another ethnicity, or ethnos, or nation, one of many. ‘Russians’ in Russia
connote members of Russian ethnicity, the most numerous nation of the Russian Federation, not the citizens of Russia, as
you would expect.
This attitude may surprise an American, or a Frenchman. It is not totally unknown in Europe, where Walloons and
Flemings populate Belgium, and Catalans and Basques live in Spain. Still, a Frenchman of Brittany or Provence is a Frenchman
first, and a Breton or Provençal a distant second. In the US, ‘ethnicity’ is a domain of recent immigrants,
Greeks or Poles; the Americans have race and religion as identity-forming factors.
In Russia the ethnic identity has been enforced since Stalin’s days: it was actually
recorded on the ID. I explain this by Stalin’s personal perceptions: a native of Georgia, the country in Transcaucasia,
he was brought up in the local tradition of ethnic awareness. For Russians proper, this ethnic identity is of little importance.
They know of it, but do not consider it greatly important. That is why in modern Russia ‘ethnicity’ is not registered
on the ID anymore.
course, Megyn Kelly, while referring to ‘Russians’ indicted by Mueller, had meant ‘citizens of Russia’,
and not ‘ethnic Russians’. Me myself, like the majority of old émigrés, also refer to “Russians”
meaning people in Russia or from Russia, or even people from the former Soviet Union. In Israel, every person whose origins
are in the USSR is called ‘Russian’, to the chagrin of Russian Jews. They would like to be called ‘Jews’
in Israel, and ‘Russians’ in Russia, but alas, it is other way around, they are called ‘Jews’ in
Russia and ‘Russians’ in Israel.
Russian ethnic nationalists of the kind embraced by my colleague Anatoly Karlin would
like to keep the ethnonym ‘Russians’ just for themselves, but they are harmless, you can disregard their whines
– they aren’t globalists for you.
Now, for the first time ever, the Russians are being trained to stick to American
word usage. This is done by Facebook, a platform that millions of Russians use. Besides opening Russia for American business
and stealing its data, Facebook is a powerful enforcer of PC in Russian minds. Whenever you refer to blacks, Jews, or even
Ukrainians you risk being banned for a week or a month.
As unusual this attitude is for the Russians, they are susceptible
for training, as we all are. These small punishments go a long way to bring Jewish hegemony to Russia. Beside protecting
Jews, or Blacks from micro-insults, the banning of words has a powerful impact on the mind. Whoever tells you what you may
or may not say, is a person of authority. This way of subduing people to your command is called Neuro-Linguistic Programming
(NLP), and the CIA is on the forefront of using this black magic of words.
Israelis, and Jews in general do not accept these taboos. It is perfectly all right
for Israelis and Jews to refer to ‘Jews’, or worse. The late Israeli MK Ze’evi, a popular right-winger
minister, called Martin Indyk, the US Ambassador in Israel, a ‘Jewboy” (יהודון); Netanyahu’s
aide called another US Ambassador a ‘Jewboy’, too. Israelis speak freely of blacks; they do not speak only, but deport
them as well. They do not mind banning non-Jews from renting apartments quite openly, too. This disregard of taboo gives
Jews an additional power in dealing with Gentiles, like a disregard of the Matrix gave supernatural powers to Neo.
disregard the taboo, too. They do not hesitate shouting “Jews are coming”, when Israeli soldiers on their jeeps
roll into their villages. Americans of Palestinian origin are scrupulous with their observance, they never utter the forbidden
J-word, (unless they want to say something nice about a Jewish friend), otherwise they speak of ‘Zionists’.
That is why Palestinians in Palestine are free, and Palestinians in the US are not, like all Americans.
This taboo should be broken. Until
it is done, the Jews will continue to dominate the discourse and the US society, the Palestinians will suffer, the bankers
will grow fat and prosperous, legal and illegal immigration will continue unabated.
Saying “Jew” will have a liberating effect, like mouthing
the name of Rumpelstiltskin. And it is much shorter.
Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means
By Mark Weber
April 14, 2009
(An audio recording
of this article, narrated by the author, is posted here for listening or downloading)
important to understand Zionism, not just because it’s an influential ideology and a powerful social-political movement,
but also because there’s a lot of ignorance, confusion and deliberate misinformation about it.
If you look up the word “Zionism”
in a standard American dictionary, what you’ll find is likely to be inaccurate, or least misleading. For example,
a popular and supposedly authoritative American dictionary in my office defines Zionism as “A movement formerly for
reestablishing, now for supporting, the Jewish national state of Israel.” / 1 This definition, which is typical of
American reference works, is more than just misleading. It’s deceitful.
The founder of the modern Zionist movement was a Jewish writer named Theodor
Herzl. In the 1890s he was living in Paris, where he was a journalist for a major newspaper in Vienna. He was deeply troubled
by the widespread anti-Semitism, or anti-Jewish sentiment, in France at the time. He thought a lot about the pattern of
tension, distrust and conflict between Jews and non-Jews that had persisted through the centuries, and he hit upon what
he believed is a solution to this age-old problem.
Herzl laid out his views in a book, written in German, entitled The Jewish State
(Der Judenstaat). Published in 1896, this work is the manifesto or basic document of the Zionist movement. A year and
a half later, Herzl convened the first international Zionist conference. Fifty one years later, when the “State of
Israel” was solemnly proclaimed at a meeting in Tel Aviv, above the speakers’ podium at the conference was, appropriately,
a large portrait of Herzl.
In his book Herzl explained that regardless of where they live, or their citizenship, Jews constitute not merely
a religious community, but a nationality, a people. He used the German word, Volk. Wherever large numbers of Jews
live among non-Jews, he said, conflict is not only likely, it’s inevitable. He wrote: "The Jewish question exists
wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews ... I believe I understand
anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." / 2
In his public and private
writings, Herzl explained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but rather a natural response by non-Jews to alien Jewish
behavior and attitudes. Anti-Jewish sentiment, he said, is not due to ignorance or bigotry, as so many have claimed. Instead,
he concluded, the ancient and seemingly intractable conflict between Jews and non-Jews is entirely understandable, because
Jews are a distinct and separate people, with interests that are different from, and which often conflict with, the interests
of the people among whom they live.
A prime source of modern anti-Jewish sentiment, Herzl believed, was that the so-called “emancipation”
of Jews in the 18th and 19th centuries from the confined life of the ghetto into modern urban society brought them into
direct economic competition with non-Jews in the middle classes. Anti-Semitism, Herzl wrote, is “an understandable
reaction to Jewish defects.” In his diary he wrote: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.”
maintained that Jews must stop pretending -- both to themselves and to non-Jews -- that they are like everyone else, and
instead must frankly acknowledge that they are a distinct and separate people, with distinct and separate goals and interests.
The only workable long-term solution, he said, is for Jews to recognize reality and live, finally, as a “normal”
people in a separate state of their own. In a memo to the Tsar of Russia, Herzl wrote that Zionism is the “final solution
of the Jewish question.” / 4
Over the years many other Jewish leaders have affirmed Herzl’s outlook. Louis Brandeis,
a US Supreme Court justice and a leading American Zionist, said: “Let us all recognize that we Jews are a distinctive
nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station or shade of belief, is necessarily a member.” / 5
Stephen S. Wise, president
of the American Jewish Congress and of the World Jewish Congress, told a rally in New York in June 1938: "I am not
an American citizen of the Jewish faith. I am a Jew ... Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race,
and we are a race." / 6
Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs: “Whenever the quantity of Jews in any
country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them ... [This] reaction ... cannot be looked upon as
anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish
immigration, and we cannot shake it off.” / 7
In keeping with the Zionist worldview, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon told a
meeting of American Jews in Jerusalem in July 2004 that all Jews around the world should relocate to Israel as soon as possible.
And because anti-Semitism was especially widespread in France, he added, Jews in that country should immediately move to
Israel. French officials quickly, and predictably, responded by rejecting Sharon’s remarks as “unacceptable.”
imagine if the leaders of France, the United States, and other countries were to respond to those remarks by Sharon, and
similar ones by other Zionists, by expressing agreement. Imagine if an American president were to respond by saying: “You’re
right, Mr. Sharon. We agree with you. We agree that Jews do not belong in the United States. In fact, we are ready to show
our support for what you say by doing everything we can to promote and encourage all Jews to leave our country and move
That would be the logical and honest attitude of non-Jewish political leaders who say that they support Israel and
Zionism. But the political leaders of the United States, France, Britain, and other such countries today are neither honest
During the 1930s, one European government that was honest and consistent in its attitude on this issue was the government
of Third Reich Germany. Jewish Zionists and German National Socialists shared similar views about how best to handle what
Herzl called “the Jewish question.” They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities,
and that Jews did not belong in Europe, but rather in the so-called "Jewish homeland” in Palestine.
On the basis of their
shared views, Germans and Jews worked together for what each community believed was in its own best national interest. The
Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-41, when the Second
World War prevented further extensive collaboration. / 9
(During the war years attitudes hardened, and policy shifted drastically.
The German policy of collaboration with Zionists and support for Jewish emigration to Palestine gave way to a harsh “final
During the 1930s, the central SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, repeatedly proclaimed its support for Zionism.
An article published in 1935, for example, told readers: / 10
“The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and
not on religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this community.
The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism,
with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around the world, and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this
basis, Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the Jewish
problem around the world.”
In late 1933, a leading German shipping line began direct passenger service from Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, providing
"strictly kosher food” on board.
In September 1935, the German government enacted the “Nuremberg Laws," which prohibited
marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the country’s Jews an alien minority
group. / 11 A few days after the Nuremberg Laws were enacted, the main German Zionist newspaper, the Jüdische
Rundschau, editorially welcomed the new measures. It explained to readers: / 12
“Germany ... is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress
when it declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the Jews have been stamped a national minority
it is again possible to establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new laws give the Jewish minority
in Germany its own cultural life, its own national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own theater,
and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own future in all aspects of national life ...”
During the 1930s, Zionist
groups, working together with Third Reich authorities, organized a network of some forty camps and agricultural centers
throughout Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.
The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation
during the Hitler era was the Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to migrate to Palestine
with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the Ha’avara -- Hebrew for "transfer" -- was concluded in
August 1933 following talks between German officials and an official of the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World
Zionist Organization. / 13
Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine through the Ha'avara and other German-Zionist
arrangements, or about ten percent of Germany's 1933 Jewish population. Some Ha'avara emigrants transferred considerable
personal wealth from Germany to Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: "Many of these people, especially
in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual replicas of their homes and factories -- indeed rough replicas of their
very existence." / 14
The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation between Hitler's Germany and international
Zionism. Through this pact, Hitler's Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to support the Zionist
movement and Jewish development in Palestine.
The essence of Zionism, or Jewish nationalism, is that Jews everywhere -- regardless
of where they live, regardless of their religious outlook, and regardless of their citizenship -- are members of the Jewish
“people” or “nation,” to whom all Jews owe a primary loyalty and allegiance.
The overwhelming majority of Jews in the
United States today identify with and support Israel, and are affiliated with Zionist groups and organizations. Every significant
Jewish group or association in the United States, and every prominent Jewish American political or community leader supports
Israel and Zionism, in most cases fervently so. With very few exceptions, even American Jews who are critical of some of
Israel’s more embarrassing policies nonetheless express support for Israel and the nationalist ideology upon which
the Zionist state is based.
A Zionist Jew, by definition, owes his primary loyalty to the Jewish community and to Israel. Zionism is not compatible
with patriotism to any country or entity other than Israel and the world Jewish community. That’s why it’s difficult
to accept as sincere or honest the pious assurances of Jewish leaders in the United States that American Jews are just as
loyal to the US as everyone else.
In the United States, nearly every prominent political leader -- Jewish and non-Jewish, Democrat and Republican
-- ardently supports Israel and the Jewish nationalist ideology upon which it is based. In Washington, political leaders
of both major parties insist on US support for Israel as an ethnically Jewish state. They fervently support, and eagerly
seek the favor of, influential Jewish-Zionist groups, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
Everyone -- whether Jewish or non-Jewish -- who claims to support Israel should, if he is honest and consistent,
endorse the view of Israeli prime minister Sharon, and other Zionist leaders, and support the migration of Jews everywhere
to Israel. But of course that’s not what happens.
With regard to Zionism and Israel, the attitude and policies of nearly
all American political leaders, Jewish and non-Jewish, is characterized by hypocrisy and deceit. To put it another way, Zionist
Jews and their non-Jewish supporters embrace a blatant double standard. Jewish-Zionist organizations, along with their non-Jewish
allies, support one social-political ideology for Israel and the world Jewish community, and a completely different one
for the United States and other non-Jewish countries. They insist that ethnic nationalism is evil and bad for non-Jews,
while at the same time they vigorously support ethnic nationalism -- that is, Zionism -- for Jews.
They insist that Israel is and must be a
Jewish nationalist state, with a privileged status for its Jewish population, including immigration laws that discriminate
against non-Jews. At the same time, Jewish-Zionist groups and leaders, and the non-Jews who support them, insist that in
the United States, Britain, France, Germany and other countries, there must be no privileged status for anyone based on race,
ethnicity or religion.
Our political leaders tell us that American Jews should be encouraged to think of themselves as a distinct national
group with an identity and community interests separate from those of other Americans. At the same time American politicians
insist that Zionist Jews be given all rights as full and equal US citizens. On the basis of this double standard, Jews are
given a privileged status in American political and cultural life.
Americans are led to believe that Zionism is a benign outlook of altruistic
and righteous support for a so-called Jewish homeland. In fact, Zionism is an ideology and movement of ethnically-based Jewish
nationalism that reinforces the identity and self-image of Jews as a distinct and separate community with interests different
from those of non-Jews, and which strengthens the already powerful world Jewish community.
- New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition (1978?), p. 1654.
- Th. Herzl, Der Judenstaat. ( http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Der_Judenstaat/Einleitung / http://www.zionismus.info/judenstaat/02.htm )
Also quoted in: M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review,
July-August 1993, p. 29. ( http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html )
- Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents (Praeger,1998), pp. 45, 48.
- Memo of Nov. 22, 1899. R. Patai, ed., The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl (New York: 1960), Vol. 3, p.
- Louis D. Brandeis, “The Jewish Problem and How to Solve It.” Speech of April
25, 1915. ( http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/personality/sources_document11.html / http://www.law.louisville.edu/library/collections/brandeis/node/234 )
- “Dr. Wise Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune,
June 13, 1938, p. 12.
- Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949), p. 90. Quoted in: Albert
S. Lindemann, The Jew Accused (1991), p. 277.
- “French Jews Must `Move to Israel’,”
BBC News, July 18, 2004 ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3904943.stm )
See also: “Sharon Urges Jews to Go to Israel,” BBC News, Nov. 17, 2003. ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3275979.stm )
- M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review,
July-August 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 4), pp. 29-37.
( http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html )
- Das Schwarze Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: Francis R. Nicosia, The
Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 56-57.
- These days the
Nuremberg Laws are routinely portrayed as imposing outrageous and inhumane discrimination against Jews. But to put this in
perspective, it’s worth mentioning two points. First: the Nuremberg Laws ban on marriage between Jews and non-Jews
is consistent with the law in Israel today, where such marriages are not permitted, as well as with the prohibition on such
marriages as laid out in the Hebrew scriptures. (See, for example: Numbers 25: 6-8; Deuteronomy 7:3; Ezra 9: 12; 10: 10-11;
Nehemiah 10: 30; 13: 25.)
Second, in 1935 less than one percent of the population of Germany was Jewish,
which meant that the Nuremberg laws ban on marriage between Jews and non-Jews was irrelevant for the vast majority of the
country’s population. By contrast, in the United States during the 1930s, most of the American states had laws in
place that prohibited marriage between people of different races. Because the portion of the American population that was
racially non-majority was much larger than in Germany, the US racial laws impacted a much larger portion of the US population
at the time than the Nuremberg laws affected the German population.
- Jüdische Rundschau,
Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in: Y. Arad, and others, Documents on the Holocaust (Jerusalem: 1981), pp. 82-83.
- W. Feilchenfeld, “Ha’avara,” New Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel (Herzl Press, 1994),
pp. 535-536; M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993,
- Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), p. 379.
OF THE WORD "JEW"
people suffer under the misapprehension that Jesus was a "Jew," moreover, that he was "King
of the Jews." Thus, by inference, that the "Jews" were the "Chosen People" of
the Holy Bible and so ancient possessors and modern inheritors of the Bible Covenants gifted by Yahweh to
their forebears Abraham, Jacob and Judah. However, this is not the case. In fact, during Christ's Mission
and Passion no such people existed called "Jews" nor indeed did the word "Jew." In short:
Jesus was NOT a "Jew" nor was he "King of the Jews."
In fact, Jesus is referred as a "Jew" for the first time
in the New Testament in the 18th century; in the revised 18th century English language editions of the
14th century first English translations of the New Testament. The etymology of the word "Jew"
is quit clear. Although "Jew" is a modern conception its roots lie in the 3rd and 4th centuries
AD. That is, the modern English word "Jew" is the 18th century contraction and corruption
of the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in St. Jerome's Vulgate Edition and derived from the Greek
word "Ioudaios." The evolution of this can easily be seen in the extant manuscripts from the
4th century to the 18th century, which illustrate not only the origin of the word "Jew" found
in the Latin word "Iudaeus" but also its current use in the English language. Littered throughout
these manuscripts are the many earlier English equivalents used by various chroniclers between the 4th
and the 18th century.
Thus, from the Latin "Iudaeus" to the English "Jew" the evolution of these English forms
is: "Gyu," "Giu," "Iu," "Iuu," "Iuw," "Ieuu,"
"Ieuy," "Iwe," "Iow," "Iewe," "Ieue," "Iue," "Ive,"
"Iew," and then, finally, the 18th century, "Jew." Similarly, the evolution of the
English equivalents for "Jews" is: "Giwis," "Giws," "Gyues," "Gywes,"
"Giwes," "Geus," "Iuys," "Iows," "Iouis," "Iews,"
and then, finally, in the 18th century, "Jews."
The Truth is Not Enough
How to Overcome Emotional Barriers to 9/11 Truth
Wednesday, August 1, 2018
How many times has this happened to you? You are explaining to someone
some of the rational, logical reasons why the official story of 9/11 can’t be true, perhaps explaining how
WTC 7 fell in the exact manner of a professionally designed controlled demolition – a job which would typically
take many weeks to prepare – when out comes a ‘thought stopper’ phrase like:
“That’s just a conspiracy theory!” or ...“Do
you also believe in Big Foot and tin foil hats?” Or perhaps the person gets angry and/or agitated. Facts
no longer matter at that point, and you may be able to tell that the person does not want to hear any more.
For example, the following response came from someone after they were given
a 20-minute summary of 9/11 Truth information:
“I wouldn’t believe that, even if it were true!”
That reaction defies logic and reason. But it clearly illustrates
just how irrational some peoples’ defenses can be. Here are a few more actual, sincere responses/defenses:
“As long as my wife
and kids are fine and we can live the life style we have, the truth is, I don’t really care what happened
would not want to live in a world where such a thing could be true.”
“You can’t expect someone to listen to information
that turns their world upside down.”
“I’m not sure I want to know. If this is true, then up would be down and
down would be up. My life would never be the same.”
“Look, I have to admit that I seriously resist anyone messing
with my worldview!”
Why So Much Resistance to 9/11 Truth?
Such reactions are emotionally based. 9/11 is a very emotionally charged issue. The source of the denial
and resistance is FEAR. The implications of 9/11 Truth are very scary for most people to take in. Given that a
part of our government’s job description is keeping its citizens safe, it’s terrifying to consider
that a secret rogue part of our government will do just the opposite – mass murder those very citizens,
in order to advance dark agendas – like wars for corporate empire [JEWISH CRIMINAL CABAL EMPIRE].
To further consider that associated ‘secret teams’ would then put out in corporate [JEWISH CRIMINAL
CABAL CONTROLLED] media cover-up stories, in the form of an elaborate fantasy story backed up with planted
evidence, and to think that story was nearly universally accepted without question – this is the stuff of
there is the difficulty of accepting the self-image shattering realization that we were duped by such cover story
lies. 9/11 Truth suggests a very uncomfortable and disturbing worldview, especially to those new to such concepts.
The intensity of fear brought up by these vast implications causes defense mechanisms to take over our rational
thought processes. Such denial most often overrides rationality.
What’s a 9/11 Truth Activist To Do?
How can we overcome such powerful denial? What knowledge about these emotional
barriers can empower us to be more effective in reaching larger numbers of our fellow citizens?
Start out by asking questions to find out
what the person you are addressing currently thinks and feels about the 9/11 Truth message. Adjust your approach
based on what you hear. Based on their responses, reach out and connect though empathy, to express to them an
understanding of their difficult position. It’s not that hard to do – after all, most of us went through
a similar process of conversion at some point, when we were in denial and uninformed about 9/11. Let them know
about your own doubts, how you had a difficult time believing that the official story was false. Explain how upsetting
it was for you to consider the alternative – that of very inconvenient truths. Even for
those of us who were not upset by the idea of 9/11 being an inside job, there was often a difficulty in wrapping
our heads around the enormity of it all. Talk about your own difficulties in rejecting the official story.
Reasons for Resistance
to the Truth
a number of valid reasons why many of us resist the truth of 9/11. What follows are some major ones.
A. The Big Lie: I’ll start with the ‘Big
Lie’ because it was the main barrier that kept me from fully accepting the truth of 9/11 as I was researching
it in the weeks after the event. The sheer audacity of pulling off something so outrageous in broad daylight,
thinking they would get away with it, and the large scale of it all kept me doubting for weeks. My turning point
was learning about what really happened at Pearl Harbor – the many warnings that were ignored, the Japanese
secret codes that the US had broken, etc. This new understanding, that the attack on Pearl Harbor was clearly allowed
to happen, was what finally had me fully accept 9/11 Truth. The comparable number that were deliberately allowed
to be mass murdered, the scale of the event, the audacity of it all, and the 60 years of largely successful cover-ups
all showed me that a Big Lie had happened before, and worked to fool most of the public, and not all that long
ago. It was only later I discovered these quotes:
“The individual is handicapped by coming
face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~ J. Edgar Hoover, Director
of the FBI
“The masses indulge in petty falsehoods every
day, but it would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths. ... The bigger the lie, therefore, the
likelier it is to be believed.” ~ Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
B. Major Paradigm Shift:
Questioning the official story of 9/11 threatens the foundations of our society, or at least seems to. It challenges
our fellow citizens’ belief systems regarding the nature of our government, and even the very nature of our
nation. Such questioning is far more profound than, say, questioning a war. Accepting the truth of 9/11 is, for
many, a major paradigm shift, often an inverting of their worldview. Such shifts risk a period of chaos and uncertainty,
which many find disturbing and scary.
C. Blind Nationalist Faith: 9/11 Truth is a confrontation with the
self-image that many Americans have – of their country and of themselves. The self-image Americans have been
sold though our school systems and media is that we are the exceptional nation, the good guys wearing the white hats,
the bringers of democracy and freedom. Such nationalistic faith can exceed religious faith in its dogmatic blindness.
Dr. David Ray Griffin addresses these issues in an edited video titled “9/11 and Nationalist Faith.” A DVD version of the full presentation including Q & A can be found here.
Projecting Parental Duties on Authorities: In his book As If We Were Grownups, author Jeff Golden’s
thoughtful assertion is that,
consistently elect [political] candidates who tell us what children would want to hear. Children want to hear
that everything is okay, that little is required of them, that they can go out and play or watch TV, and that they’ll
be taken care of and protected. In exchange, they are expected to be seen and not heard, to pay their taxes, and
to not question the authorities.”
E. Admission of Gullibility: Anyone we are introducing
9/11 Truth to now has believed the official story for years. To accept 9/11 Truth they have to admit they were
duped, deceived, and manipulated for all that time. That brings up questions of gullibility, naiveté, lack
of perceptiveness, obliviousness, etc. Most of us have resistance to admitting such shortcomings. Astronomer Carl
Sagan sums it up nicely:
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled
long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the
truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge – even to ourselves –
that we’ve been so credulous [i.e. gullible].”
F. The Rabbit Hole Effect
– Wider Implications: To believe 9/11 Truth, one also has to believe many other difficult truths,
- Parts of our corporate media [Jewish Cabal Controlled Media] must be incredibly corrupt and/or controlled
to be complicit in such a massive cover-up.
- There must
be a powerful, secret, hidden part of our overt government that is capable of planning and executing such a horrible
and unthinkable act.
- Some of our leaders are
more corrupt and malicious than most of us would want to believe. But one has only to remember the words of philosopher
and statesman, Edmund Burke, to understand how corruption tends to grow especially in good times:
only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
and Complacency: Radio talk show host, Mike Rivero, sheds some light on why so many people are apathetic
and complacent about changing their beliefs:
“Most people prefer to believe their
leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that
the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about
it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to
do nothing is to surrender one’s self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to
face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards
an excuse not to think at all.”
H. PTSD – Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: 9/11 was
first and foremost a Psyop, shorthand for a Psychological Operation. It is a term used by secret services like
the CIA to describe a class of operations that are intended to manipulate the emotions of populations; it is a
form of mind control.
The specific intention of 9/11 was to terrorize the American people into supporting the so-called “war
on terror,” [Initiation of the ODED YINON PLAN] which is a replacement for the cold war’s
“war on communism.” It’s a blank check for the US government and the American military-industrial-complex
to attack anyone, anywhere they want, anytime they want – to support the empire.
The psy-op initially worked for a vast majority
of US citizens, and for many, it is still working.
The terror that so many felt during and after the attacks left many people,
particularly in New York City, with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder – PTSD. To revisit those events, as is
necessary to expose the truth of 9/11, can retrigger that stress and add to the other discomforts that are already
intrinsic to that same truth we are revealing. The desire to minimize re-experiencing that trauma causes people
to back away. We need to go easy on those who exhibit such stress.
I. Lack of Knowledge of Historical Parallels or Patterns:
While not strictly an emotional issue, the ignorance most people have about the many false flag events used to
justify wars throughout history also has a psychological component. Our ability to conceptualize new information
is dependent on having a frame of reference, that is, already knowing something similar, in order to be able to
anchor a new thought. The lack of such historical reference points, therefore, can be yet another source of resistance.
This blockage is perhaps the easiest one to deal with – by educating people about the long history of false
flag events used for triggering wars.
The Awakening Will Take Time
These are many of the major reasons why so many people resist
9/11 Truth. By understanding them, we can meet people with empathy and understanding, and have more patience with
them. Patience is so important because for most, awakening to 9/11 Truth is a gradual process, often taking weeks,
months, or even years. In light of that, try to be sensitive when presenting evidence, so as to notice when a
person is ‘full’ – when they have heard enough for the moment, and need space to digest and absorb
the new, and often, disturbing concepts.
The good news is that with all that is happening now in our post-9/11 world, particularly
with the public knowledge of the lies about WMDs in Iraq, and the lies about Saddam Hussein being linked to al
Qaeda and 9/11, due to those lies that led us into war with Iraq being exposed as lies, people’s minds are
opening wider every day. More and more people are waking up to the degree of corruption and deception that is routine
in our government. Every day they learn more about how the corporate media [JEWISH CRIMINAL CABAL CONTROLLED
MEDIA] have been complicit in lies (“fake news) and cover-ups. Trust in such corporate and governmental
institutions is now at an all time low, and dropping. This makes people far more open to the 9/11 Truth message.
In a very real sense, our job is getting easier.
The truth alone is not enough, but the truth plus strategic thinking, planning
and educating is enough to convince most fence-sitters. As David Hutton, author of The Change Agents’ Handbook, says: “You do not have to spend a lot of time and effort on those who strongly resist change. You only have
to help and protect those who want to change.” Understanding the various emotional obstacles is an essential
part of such a strategy.
It’s been about seventeen years for some of us who have been working to expose the truth about
9/11. We have made great progress, but still have far to go. We will continue to progress as long as we work smart
and don’t give up. The truth will continue being revealed, and the resultant awakening will lead to the
kind of deep changes that are so necessary to create a more positive future.
Are you afraid
to tell the truth?
to be: Offend the Jews
and your future is in jeopardy
By John Kaminski
When history is a lie, revisionism becomes the truth.
we’re up against is bigger than any country. In fact, it’s bigger than all the countries in the world.
The ruthless powers that
be have decided that only they can declare what is truth and that it is against the law to disagree with them.
The human mind is being locked up for the final time.
Amazon, Google and Facebook are all Jewish entities, and all
prohibit objective discussion about the lies told about the World Wars. Utterances that describe the events of
World War II that are not approved by the Jews are now called “hate crimes”.
Jews most definitely cannot prove
what they say about WWII — but we can. Six million?! Baloney! 296,081 is Germar Rudolf’s 2003 count,
following the International Red Cross count in October 1980 of 273,905. How many billions of dollars have the
Jews stolen from the world with this falsehood they have inflicted on everyone with their incessant and fallacious
Jews can’t prove there were gas chambers at Auschwitz or anywhere else. The thousands of hysterical Jewish
testimonies about concentration camp horrors remain totally refuted by the International Red Cross visits during
the war which found German treatment of prisoners far superior to the way Americans treated the Japanese prisoners
they interned during WW II.
Think about why Ursula Haverback, age 89, would risk prison to tell the real story of WW II, in which
three Jewish controlled countries — Britain, the USSR and the USA — conspired to eliminate the last
viable challenger to Jewish financial control of the world, which was the German economic miracle devised and
deployed by Adolf Hitler. Would Mrs. Haverbeck do this because she was insane, or because she was telling the truth?
Even more puzzling,
why would the German government insist on jailing an old woman who questioned a simple detail of history —
unless they were trying to cover up a gigantic lie? For those with eyes to see, the answer is clear.
Think too about Saddam Hussein
and Muammar Gadhafi, both of whom treated their citizens much more kindly than the Jewish-run countries of the
West. They followed Hitler’s example of treating their own people well. And they were murdered by the Jewish
Deep State using their favorite weapon, the American war machine.
Most Americans simply have not realized that all contemporary
media — movies, music, TV, even books — are controlled by Jews. Those outlets not owned by Jews are
statistically insignificant and generally ignored.
But now, the Jewish onslaught of trying to erase independent thought from the world has intensified.
A whole category of history has been expunged by the Jews from all the electronic media they own, which is practically
And honest people are being lined up for incarceration and silence so the Jews may more easily make their
fabricated history become the de facto history of the world.
Imprisoned by lies
Everyone in the world is now prevented by financial blackmail
from even contemplating the truth. Jews control all your money, no matter how many non Jewish intermediaries exist
between you and them.
Even as you read this, the vise grips clamped around your head begin to tighten.
Play ball and you have nothing
to worry about. Blow the whistle on these child-eating maniacs and you’re going down hard. They’ll
kill your children. A Congressman whose questions were a little too sharp just resigned because of that threat.
Remember what happened to Paul Wellstone.
Revisionists tend to be idealists. They observe objectively. What they write tends to be clear.
They don’t make things up, unlike the purveyors of the lies they seek to revise.
I’m like everybody else.
I believed the propaganda I heard most of my life (or at least since the late 1960s). Took me to middle age to be
jarred into realizing I was believing in some obvious lies.
What if telling the truth will cost you your job? What if your wife and family call
you a beast and throw you out of the house for harboring such horrendous ideas?
Jews own your soul because they own your money and also have
the ability to take it all away from you at any time.
They want you to be afraid to tell the truth. As a replacement, they
want you to believe their truth, which is invariably at variance with what actually happened.
Both World Wars, 9/11, the fouling
of the sky with chemtrails, the poisoning of humanity with Glyphosate, and the capture of the world’s media
— these are all Jew poisons you ingest daily.
God help you if you start telling people that Adolf Hitler was actually the good
guy. It won’t matter to them that it happens to be the truth, because they’re so scared of what will happen
to them should they choose to stop living their lie.
Mainstream history is entirely false
In case you don’t know by
now, Jewish truth is an oxymoron. There is no such thing existing in the world. The Jews’ holiest books command
Jews to lie to non Jews in all situations. Now they’ve swindled the money of every country in the world,
which all dance to the puppet’s tune while their leaders steal most of the money.
The penetration of Jewish lies
in the world mind is nearly complete. Most of what people have been tricked into believing is false.
Regarding the empirical
facts of World War II, we can prove what we say and they can’t. They can only cast aspersions, trap you in
blackmail, or if all else fails, hire some hungry poor person with sociopathic tendencies to murder you. If your
offense is somewhat less bothersome, they use the courts, the law, the legal profession, the cops, and the TV stations
which will tell everyone what a bad person you are because you disagree with the Jews.
In the European Union courts,
when it comes to Holocaust disputation, they say the truth is no defense. They put you in jail merely for attempting
to tell the truth.
How silly is that? Pick an adjective. Insane would be a good one.
Jewish scripture urges Jews “to kill the best Gentiles”,
which they do, constantly.
A game we can’t win
The measure of Jewish control of Britain was amply demonstrated by the arrest and
continuing harassment of singer Alison Chabloz. This self-appointed Jew organization had to browbeat the government
four times before charges were finally pressed. She could have lampooned any other ethnic group and no one would
have lifted an eyebrow.
And then they staged this phony arrest of Tommy Robinson supposedly protesting the Muslim rape epidemic
to make sure Alison got no media coverage. (By the way, why have British authorities allowed the Muslim rape epidemic
to continue for more than ten years?)
We’re playing a Jewish game with the media, and it’s a game we can’t win.
Jez Turner was put
in jail for worse. He described Jewish control of British history perfectly and got slammed into jail during a particularly
fruitful roundup of Revisionist activists
Now the Schaefers are in jail and Arthur Topham, who had been devoutly monitoring
the daily status of the recently arrested, remains silent.
And this is what these anti semitism laws are all about:
to prevent discussion of Jewish crimes.
Jewish soldiers kill Palestinians for fun. Jewish food producers poison Americans by the millions.
Jewish drug manufacturers have addicted the whole world to their poison pills.
All Jews are sociopaths because they follow the insane commands
of the Talmud. Jews are not allowed to report crimes by their fellow Jews. How can they be good citizens anywhere?
They have turned America
into a sociopathic country, using the promotion of blacks to retard the culture of whites.
People are being lied to. The U.S.
is the chief force for evil in the world, mostly because they are doing the bidding of rich Jews who control the
world’s money supply.
Besides Israel and the Jews in the City of London I defy you to tell me another power in the world that
can make the U.S. military go anywhere in the world and murder those they are ordered to eliminate.
obedience to murderous policies
Tell the truth and go to jail! It’s the new party toast. Everything has been
reversed. Leave those child molesters alone; they’re the ones in charge of the world.
How in the world
is anyone supposed to deal with a legal system that declares the truth is no defense. What would Thomas Jefferson
say about that?
Everything has been reversed. The good people are being put in jail. The bad people are making the laws.
So that the freedom of
speech and thought once guaranteed to all Americans are no longer in effect. Today, we can no longer criticize Jews
for their manic criminality that negatively affects everybody on Earth.
We will be arrested if we do. But if we don’t the future
promises only mindless obedience to murderous policies from which we may never be able to protect ourselves.
Click on this text to visit the RUSSIA INSIDER website...
It's Time to Drop the Jew Taboo
It's making serious discussion of Russian geopolitics and history next to impossible
The paintings used as illustrations in this article are taken
from the website of Ilya Glazunov and can be seen full-size in HD here and here. Russia Insider published a long profile of him and his work in 2016. Much of his work, both paintings and books, dealt extensively with the Jewish role in Russian history.
Most people know about,
but few are willing to condemn, the strict taboo in the media, of criticizing Jews as a group, using that term. One cannot
even criticize a small subsection of Jews, a miniscule percentage of the Jewish population, even when they richly deserve
this is a ridiculous way to run a publication whose object is to get to the truth, so I am writing this to explain why, from
now on, the pages of Russia Insider will be open to articles which fairly and honestly address
the influence of Jewish elites, including pointing out when it is malevolent, which it often is, and try to understand it
and explain it, with malice towards none.
I have become convinced that unless we break this taboo, nothing will improve
in the human catastrophe unfolding in geopolitics. Millions have died over the past 30 years, and if we want it to stop,
and to avoid a cataclysm which seems to approach inexorably, we have to have the freedom to criticize those responsible.
It is very clear to me, as it is to many others, that much of the guilt for this comes from Jewish pressure groups, particularly
in the media.
can see as an editor, that much of what is written about geopolitics in the ‘public square’, admirable thought
it may be in other respects, makes itself irrelevant by tiptoeing around this crucial issue.
I am a newcomer to the media world,
unexpectedly thrust three years ago into the role of owner, publisher and editor of this fairly widely read publication.
We get about 10 million visits per month across all of our platforms from a sophisticated audience, and we are widely followed
by so- called 'influencers'. We've made a big mark in a short time, and we did it by saying what others were not willing
to say. Many subjects which we were the first to speak about on a major platform have now entered the mainstream.
Insider is a grassroots phenomenon, and sometimes resembles a political movement as much as it does a publication.
We exist solely because of small donations from readers. We get no funding from major donors, not to mention governments,
foundations, or other organized groups. It is all private individuals. Our single largest donation over the past year was
$5000, and the median gift is $30. We raised about $80,000 last year. This gives us the freedom to pretty much say what
we want, something that can be said of very few publications, even in the alternative media space, most of whom are beholden
to large donors.
I see everyday how one can influence the public agenda by addressing or ignoring certain topics. One really can
make a difference, and I have tried to have a positive impact, as I understand it. It has been a remarkable education in
the power of the media, even of our relatively small Russia Insider.
But this taboo is the great exception.
It really is quite extraordinary, to realize that you can publish about just about anything, except that. As I
said, just about everyone knows about the taboo, and I did too in my previous career in business, but it is another thing
altogether to enforce it, which I felt, until recently, compelled to do, and to have your nose rubbed
in it every day when trying to make sense of world events.
2. The euphemisms
Some try to skirt the taboo with euphemisms. A veritable cottage industry has emerged inventing
ever new ones, indeed, this is the new trend in the alt-media. We hear a lot about 'Zionists', 'elites', 'global elites',
'globalists', 'neocons', 'liberal interventionists', 'the war party', 'the Israel lobby', 'the deep state', 'bankers', 'new
world order' (I never understood what that is actually), 'Bilderbergers' - sounds like a nice man from a central-European
fairytale. My friend the Saker goes with 'Anglozionists'.
But none of these terms work, do they? They all obscure the issue,
actually enhancing the taboo’s inherent deceit.
Zionists? Really? I've never heard anyone describe themselves this way, or even other
people describe them - 'Have you meet Max?, he's an enthusiastic Zionist!' I've never seen it mentioned as an interest in
a social media profile (perhaps Facebook should include it as an Emoticon). Maybe Rachel Maddow IS a Zionist, what do I
know, although as far as I understand, Zionism was a political movement that lost its urgency once the state of Israel was
well on its merry way. Elites? Well, no, I would reckon many Jews are elites, but more Jews are not, and more elites are
non- Jews, so no, that doesn't work. Well, you get the idea. These are attempts to slip past the ever-zealous censor, and
they serve to maintain the confusion and deception.
No, the only trait that these people have in common, is their Jewish heritage. Some
are liberals, some are conservatives. Some are religious, some are not. Some are mixed Jewish heritage, some are not. Some
care about Israel, some do not. Some support Israel others criticize her. They are politicians, journalists, academics,
comedians, actors, or, businessmen. Some stem from Western Europe, others from Eastern Europe, and others from the Middle
3. Hostility to Putin's Russia is largely a Jewish phenomenon
Russia Insider's mission is to explain and
describe Russia and her role in the world. As soon as you begin to drill into how other nations relate to Russia, and Russian
history, it becomes obvious that the unreasonable hostility towards Putin's Russia, particularly coming from the US and
the UK, is very much a Jewish phenomenon, and has been for centuries.
And yes, 'Jewish' is the only term that accurately describes it, and
not one of the many euphemisms we frequently see used.
The most vitriolic and obsessive Russia-bashing journalists in the media are mostly
Jewish. The publications which push these writers most energetically are ALL Jewish-owned, and as a publisher, I know very
well, that is where the buck stops.
On the policy side, the neo-conservative movement, Russia's harshest foe, was conceived of,
is led by, and consists mostly of, Jews. And their trouble-making extends far beyond Russia - they are responsible for America's
disastrous debacle in the Middle East over the last 20 years - where their crimes have been stymied by precisely one country
- Russia. The psychotically anti-Russian recent UN ambassadors, Nikki Haley and Samantha Power, were put there by the Israel
lobby, and given an independent brief, in other words, they answer not to their presidents, rather to their Jewish sponsors.
In Congress the
biggest Russia-Gate tub-thumpers are noticeably Jewish - Schiff, Schumer, Cardin, Blumenthal, Franken (although not as overwhelmingly
as in the media). The Israel lobby routinely enforces legislation hostile to Russia. Bill Browder with his Magnitsky Sanctions
- is Jewish.
4. The media
But let's talk about the media - for this is where the real power lies. All other levers and branches of government
pale in comparison when it comes to real political influence.
The two leading newspapers of the land, the New York Times
and The Washington Post, both very Jewish in ownership, editors, and staff, have been waging an
all-out jihad against Putin's Russia, and are guilty of the most grotesque dishonesty, slander and journalistic malpractice
- exhaustively catalogued by one of the most authoritative and admired veteran journalists in America, Robert Parry, winner
of the Polk award among other accolades. You can see an archive of his extraordinary work criticizing these two publications,
particularly in relation to Russia, here.
with its lily-white image as purveyor of Masterpiece Theater and other highbrow offerings, is wholly dependent on donations
from wealthy Jews. Like some Gentile starlet submitting to Harvey Weinstein, that station has allowed itself to be used,
churning out a relentless stream of the most ridiculous anti-Putin propaganda that would be funny if it wasn't so effective
among the gray-haired, non-flyover denizens of America, and their deep pocketbooks. CNN, a deeply Jewish company, has been
pushing Russiagate like a religion, to the point to where their brand has suffered severe damage.
Rachel Maddow, the nation's most popular
and influential liberal political show host is Jewish. She has gone so overboard demonizing Russia and pushing Russiagate
that she has become a figure of fun. On the print side, the list is the same - the ones shrieking the loudest are mostly
Jews, and disproportionately female - and there is an important lesson there too - Masha Gessen, Anne Applebaum, and Julia
loffe, to name a few.
The refrain from the male chorus is no less strident. David Remnick, David Frum, Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer.
Even comedy news hates Russia - John Oliver, Jon Stewart (previously), Bill Maher, all Jews, go to great efforts to convince
Americans that Putin's Russia is, quite literally, - and this term is frequently used - 'Hitlerian.'
Jewish-owned high brow magazines have
been leading the charge against Putin - the Newhouse's New Yorker, the NY Review of
Books (the management of this venerable magazine is obsessed with the subject). The New Republic,
Newsweek, The Atlantic, and the Rothschild-owned Economist
pump out story after story full of what can only be called lies, in a massive campaign to demonize Russia and Putin.
the Yale historian, and Michael Weiss, the neocon firebrand whose website, The Interpreter, is
funded by the exiled Jewish oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, are two more prominent figures in this phenomenon.
Economist deserves special mention with Ed Lucas leading the charge (previously), (he is the great nephew of
Charles Portal, a Jewish air marshal in Britain who was a relentless proponent of fire-bombing German civilians and is thought
to be behind the burning of Dresden). Equally vitriolic are the writings of Ben Judah and his father, Tim.
But to draw attention
to all this, or to investigate whether there is something about their Jewishness that makes them so hostile to Russia,
is simply, verboten. Inevitably, when I point out this overwhelming ethnic imbalance, people say, well what about the many
critics of the hostility to Russia who are Jewish? – the eminently admirable Glenn Greenwald is a prominent example,
and there are many others. The answer is, that the exception to a trend doesn’t disprove it, and can often serve
to mask it.
5. A de facto violation of free speech
The truth is, that in a nation which frantically pats itself on the shoulder for
enshrining ‘free speech’ in its national credo, and ceaselessly lectures others on the subject with pompous sanctimony,
speech is not de facto free on this crucial and world-threatening subject, a remarkable, and dangerous, state of affairs.
I will not be clapped into prison for publishing this article, but the taboo works like a charm to keep the topic out of
public discussion. Who needs repressive laws when you can con people into censoring themselves? In Germany, the dominant
power in Europe, and in other European countries, I could be locked up for it – another shocking thought, for this
son of Germany.
The Jewish dominance of the Russia-bashing phenomenon is far more extensive than I can convey in a couple of short
paragraphs, and I urge someone to do this in a more systematic way. I will be happy to publish it.
6. Shutting down an honest examination of Russian history
of the most spectacular aspects of the taboo is how it whitewashes one of the most extraordinary events in the history of
mankind, the Russian revolution.
Russians fleeing the revolution believed that it was mostly a Jewish coup d’etat, financed by wealthy bankers in New
York and London who were sworn enemies of Christian Tsarism. Indeed there is strong evidence to suggest that this is true.
This view argues that the terror visited on Russia during the civil war and its aftermath, continuing well into the Stalin
years, for he could not really control it either, was a Jewish one. Cursory evidence also suggests that this is so, if only
because so much of the Bolshevik leadership was Jewish, in particular, Trotsky, but also many other vicious personalities,
especially in the secret police which so terrorized the Russian people.
Ford was heavily influenced by this view, which he heard from Russian emigres, augmenting his anti-semitism, and it has
been well-documented by liberal mainstream historians that the German National Socialist movement became radically more anti-semitic in reaction
to this interpretation, which they adopted, strongly influenced by an influx of White Russians finding refuge in Europe.
But one doesn’t hear a whisper about all this in mainstream historical articles, even to debunk it, presumably because
someone might have their ‘feelings’ hurt.
all reverberates to this day. The virulent and entrenched anti-semitism in today’s Ukraine is a direct heir of this
White Russian view. This is because the Nazis had long-standing subversive programs implemented by their White Russian allies
inside Ukraine and the Baltics, which were heavily German in ethnicity. The famines of the 30s increased the sentiment.
When Hitler invaded this work paid off magnificently, and Western Ukraine enthusiastically welcomed him and fought with his
armies, as did many in the Baltics. After the war, German intelligence, in return for clemency, traded this network to the
CIA, which continued the program to destabilize the USSR, and these programs, representing significant financial and institutional
support continued right through the cold war, and into the present day.
What happened in 2014 in the Ukraine had a 100 year provenance, and is inextricably linked
to alleged Jewish culpability for the revolution. But for all the gallons of ink spilt about the events of 2014, this crucial
background is left laregly undiscussed, even in the alternative media (I of all people, can attest to this).
Such is the reach and devastating effect of this taboo.
The enormity of the omission is mind-boggling. The suffering of the Russian
people in the decades after the revolution was extraordinary – and here there is little agreement – modern revisionists
insist that the revolution and its aftermath claimed perhaps 2 million victims, others say it reached into the 10s of millions.
And it is not just the number of people, but the way it was carried out – families ripped apart, fathers hauled off
in the middle of the night, churches blown up, priests tortured and subjected to ritual murder, phony confessions beaten
out of innocents, summary executions without trial, an enforced culture of snitching, millions sent to slave labor camps
– a nation was held in terror for decades, traumatized to this day. If there is even the slightest suspicion that
this was in essence, a Jewish pogrom against ethnic Russians, surely it deserves some public examination.
But no, it seems people think observing the taboo is more important.
We try on Russia Insider to give exposure to this view
of events, which I believe deserves a hearing – I am not enough of an expert to say whether it is correct - but so
effective is the taboo, that there is little of quality available. There is a very substantial body of work available about
this in Russian, most of it written since the fall of Communism, - in contrast to the West, this is a widely discussed view
inside Russia – so the heavy lifting has been done – it just needs to be rendered into English.
7. The best alt-media journalists are neutered
One of the things we do at RI is to scan the alternative media for
what we think are the best articles about Russia, and republish them with a link to the original. We also keep an eye on
what we think are the most dishonest articles - and critique them, and it is this comprehensive surveying of the writers
and the publications that gives me such a strong understanding of the Jewishness of the hostility. The casual reader’s
awareness of it may be anecdotal – I can assure you, it is more pronounced than people realize. When you read, catalog,
analyze, track, and critique this river of thought 8 hours a day it becomes starkly obvious.
I am routinely and happily amazed by
the fantastic writing about Russia, left, right, and center, in the alternative media, which comes from a most impressive
cast of characters, the bulk of it about geopolitics. The intellectual heft and scholarship is extraordinary. Borrowing
from this brilliance, we put out a deeper and more thorough analysis of things Russia-related than news organizations with
20 times our budget.
Some of these men are true heroes, speaking truth to power, fighting back against a system gone horribly wrong,
brave, selfless, often sacrificing career and financial well-being - but there is one line they won't cross.
8. Much of what is written about Russian relations and history becomes meaningless and deceptive
Sadly, a lot of
what they write, is, meaningless, and almost amounts to professional malpractice, because the Jewish push for confrontation
with Russia is, by far, the most significant factor. Excluding it from a discussion of geopolitics is ignoring the elephant,
not in the corner, rather the one dancing a Mazurka in the middle of the room. We should not forget that willful omission
is a species of lying, and is recognized as such in a court of law, and this case is no different.
The omission is misleading, and sows
endless confusion, for it compels writers to place blame where it does not really belong - the list of culprits is endless:
'Democrats', Liberals', sometimes it is 'America did this', or 'Americans did that', or it is Trump, or Obama, or Hillary,
or Rex Tillerson, or John McCain, or 'the Military Industrial Complex, the Deep State, the Intelligence Community, and on
and on. Yes, these individuals are complicit, (except ‘America’, it is a ridiculous notion that we 350 million
souls collectively agree on anything) but it is not their spineless treachery that is of prime importance, rather the powerful
Jews in American politics and media who so easily compel them to dance to their tune.
9. A lesson in relevance from the Alt-Right
The Alt-Right is helpful in understanding Russia, because it has intellectual heft,
and produces a lot of good writing about Russia and Russian relations, much of which is spot-on. We follow the Alt-Right
media and republish the occasional article, and they are invariably very popular on Russia Insider
– largely, I think, because they are offering a fresh point of view, and talking about vitally important issues
others refuse to address.
The Alt-Right is a youth movement. Its leaders are mostly in their 30s, and the rank and file, which is large indeed,
running, by some estimates, into the 10s of millions globally, seems to mostly range from mid- teens to mid 20s. Much of
the Alt-Right has completely discarded this taboo and revels in flouting it, indeed, trampling on it, as is the wont of
young people regarding the more tedious and preposterous conventions of every era.
It is axiomatic, I think, that one way youth benefits society, is
that they question what the old men are saying, - shake things up a bit, make them examine their assumptions. It is no coincidence
that in the Emperor With No Clothes children’s story, it is a child who points out the obvious, what the adults
are so desperately pretending not to see, because it will impair their material well-being.
Pointing out the pernicious effects
of the influence of certain Jewish elites on many aspects of American and European society and politics, as the Alt-Right
does, greatly assists in understanding how politics really work.
If you doubt this, then I highly recommend that you listen to a couple
of episodes of the most popular Alt-Right podcasts, like Fash the Nation, or Richard Spencer’s Alt-Right Politics, easily accessible by smartphone. The Fash the Nation hosts are two Beltway policy
wonks who sound like they are in their late 20s or early 30s, who spend a couple hours each week talking politics. In their
analysis, when relevant, and not over-stating it, they point out when Jewish interests are at play, when politicians, journalists,
lobbyists, publishers, publications, foundations, or their main funders, allies, spouses, and backers, are Jewish. The gang
at Alt-Right Politics does the same. It becomes very clear what is intuitively obvious - that
blotting out any mention of this hampers any serious discussion.
(For Fash the Nation, I recommend episodes with Marcus Halberstram,
like this one, and for Alt Right Politics, the year-in-review episode was a good one. The Fash the Nation hosts use obscenity on their show, which unfortunately detracts
from their credibility, but don't be put off by it, put it up to youthful ignorance - they are worth listening to.)
By blowing up
this taboo, the Alt-Right is making itself relevant, and those who cling to it, irrelevant. A taboo only works if it is
universally observed - if a sizable number of people begin ignoring it, everyone else begins to look increasingly ridiculous.
Liberals spend an inordinate amount of time wringing their hands about the Alt-Right. By refusing to openly and fairly discuss
Jewish influence, they are handing them a powerful competitive advantage.
The Alt-Right is doing society a service by addressing an issue that
urgently needs sunlight, and by providing an eco-system of websites and podcasts where authors can be published and critiqued,
and points argued back and forth. Much of the discussion of Jewish influence in the Alt-Right is very scholarly, fair
and balanced, i.e. the work of Kevin MacDonald or Michael Hoffman.
believe the Alt-Right will continue to gain traction, simply because they intelligently discuss two sacred cows – the
Jewish Question, and, closely linked to it, racial equality in terms of abilities, and the desirability of mixed-race societies.
As long as they are addressing these two crucial issues, and no one else is, they will grow.
10. Malice towards none
Another pernicious effect of taboos is that they can lead to angry outbursts. When problems
are not addressed, they tend to fester and worsen, until they become intolerable, and then there is sometimes a sudden and
violent reaction. You can see this dynamic in the public discussion of the malevolent influence of Jewish elites. Some people,
when they finally perceive its reach and harm, having been mislead by people they admired and trusted, lash out in anger
– a common reaction when you find out you’ve been deceived about something vitally important. This, I believe,
is another reason to be rid of this taboo as soon as possible – it has a way of making things worse.
Obviously, this discussion should be
done without any hatred or anger to Jews as a whole. The Jews who are causing the trouble – the ones at the pinnacles
of political and media power, are a small group indeed. Anyone who has grown up with and knows Jews well, as I have, knows
that they are like people everywhere - basically decent, and this has been my overwhelming personal experience. It is their
elite institutions that for some reason are clearly malevolent, and this demands public examination, not the least by Jews
What I am calling for is criticizing the elites who have given their nation a very bad name, and figuring out why
this pattern repeats itself throughout history.
11. The problem extends to all areas of public life
The ongoing sex scandals which grace our front pages seem to
provide an exclamation point to the phenomenon. Across the board, from Hollywood to entertainment to media to Washington,
the poor sods being called out by the screeching harpy mob tend towards a certain ethnicity, not to mention the leading
men in the spectacle. For all the talk and blather and belly button contemplation that the drama is evoking, no one, outside
the Alt-Right, mentions this obvious fact, for it would be impolite.
The problem seems to arise when Jews get into positions of influence,
i.e., when they join the dreaded 'elites'. Then, for some reason, regardless of their political sympathies or other particulars,
they get up to no good - and something goes seriously wrong. Maybe the powerful Jewish institutions - the media, the banks,
the movie studios, the music industry, etc, are in the hands of degenerates who demand bad behavior as the price of admission,
and then enforce it. I really don't know, but obviously the question begs for examination, as the evidence does suggest
that much of human enterprise dominated and shaped by Jews is a bottomless pit of trouble with a peculiar penchant for mendacity
and cynicism, hostility to Christianity and Christian values, and in geopolitics, a clear bloodlust.
Hollywood and TV dramas? A completely
Jewish-dominated industry, and a soulless spiral of depravity and cynicism, which only worsens with each passing year. Financial
markets? - ditto - just watch the movies The Big Short or The Wolf of Wall Street for a particularly vivid
illustration. Pop music and the rap nightmare? - ditto. The state of Israel and its treatment of the Palestinians? - more
of the same. American foreign policy? - an unmitigated disaster which has murdered millions and squandered trillions over
the last 30 years.
And I think 'murder' is the right word here -I think if you would ask the relatives of the 2 or so million Iraqis,
Libyans, Syrians, Yemenis, East Ukrainians, or Serbs who died in the wars instigated by the largely Jewish- dictated US
foreign policy over the past couple of decades, that they would back me up on that.
In each of these cases, one sees a tendency towards dishonesty. Indeed
the whole 'Fake News' phenomenon, is fundamentally Jewish. It is the Jewish-owned American and European media which churn out
an astonishing quantity of what can only be called lies.
12. We need serious scholarship and analysis
Yes, 1900 years after the exasperated Romans scattered the Hebrew
tribes to the four winds, the 'JQ' is still a huge, messy, unsolved problem, and in our age, it is reaching yet another
crisis. I can only speak with any expertise on a subject I know a lot about. Western foreign policy towards Russia, and
Russian history, and the Jewish influence there is nothing short of an extinction-level threat to the entire planet. I am
sure experts in Middle Eastern politics would confirm something similar.
All this needs scholarship and serious inquiry, to finally get to
the bottom of this ongoing tragedy, a tragedy for both Jew and Gentile alike. Some writers have made important inroads,
like Kevin MacDonald, but much more needs to be done to understand the problem.
One serious writer, Michael Hoffman, in his book Judaism's Strange Gods, argues the problem is with modern Judaism, which has changed radically from the religion of the Old Testament, effectively
hijacked by various Jewish sects such as the New Testament era Pharisees who inspire misanthropic behavior among elites.
I really can't say, but it is precisely this kind of inquiry which is needed to figure out, as our president likes to say
'what the hell is going on'.
13. Low expectations from the existing alt-media
I know that many writers and editors in the alt-media, and the alt-lite,
privately agree with what I have written here, but we should not expect many of them to break the taboo anytime soon. The
reason is that they mostly barely hang on financially, and often work for tiny wages, and any such change in editorial policy
would knock out a certain part of their funding, (not to mention some of their better authors) making their financial situation
untenable. Some are beholden to foundations or governments who would pull support. The needed intellectual work is going
to be done on the few platforms whose support base will tolerate it – and this will mostly be on the Alt-Right, or
publications that can buck the tide, like Russia Insider.
14. A call for articles and support
I met strong resistance to the ideas expressed here from colleagues, staff
and columnists who contribute to RI. I've discussed it at length with many of them. Some of the best writers on the site,
and some of the most articulate critics of America's inane policy towards Russia, are Jewish. Some agree with me privately,
but say that to do so publicly would so damage their careers that they cannot. Some do not agree.
depends heavily on reader contributions, and I suppose this will curtail donations from some, so if you agree with this
article, then now would be a good time to click on the donate button.
Discussion of the Jewish problem (and 'problem' is the right word
here) is obviously not going to be the focus of Russia Insider - we try to be primarily about Russia,
but I am willing to give space to this issue, and not just as it relates to Russia. I invite all writers, including from
the Alt-Right, to get in touch with me directly at email@example.com with article ideas, proposals,
or anything else, and yes, we will publish articles which use (((echoes))).
It is my great regret that we are not in a position to pay authors
for articles. If anyone reading this is in a position to help provide funding to pay writers on this important subject,
that would be helpful, because it immediately raises the quality and depth of the writing. If you are interested, please
get in touch with me directly.
At the end of the day, I don't care whether other people agree with me on this or not, whether
I lose or gain authors or donations, traffic or influence, or whether the big tech platforms try to hush us up (they are
already actively doing so). I started this site in the Fall of 2014 to call out a terrible crime, a whopping lie being told,
by the media, most vociferously by Jews in very influential Jewish-owned publications, (Andrew Kramer and the
editorial board of the New York Times being the prime example) about the conflict in the Ukraine. I didn't see it as a Jewish
problem then – I just knew it wasn’t true. I knew relatively little about Jewish influence at the time. But after
three years of immersing myself in political analysis and media criticism, it is as plain as day that this is the case.
Insider earned respect by doing our best to tell the truth, and calling out flagrant dishonesty in the media.
We're not about
to stop now.
Secrets found in the holy book of the Jews called the Talmud.
Things you should be warned about, considering there is no
in good faith with anyone adhering to these doctrines.
Some highlights translated.
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering
Goyim (non Jews) is like killing of a wild animal"
2. Aboda Zera 26b: " Even the Best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A Goy (gentile) who pries into the law (Talmud)
is guilty of death."
4. Libbre David 37: "To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing
of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly."
5. Libbre David 37: "If a Jew be called upon
to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Whoever will violate this order shall
be put to death.
Yabhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse is permitted with a little girl if she is 3 years of age."
7. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely
by using subterfuge wording."
8. Hilkkoth Akkum XI: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
9. Hilkkoth Akkum XI: "Show no mercy to Goyim."
10. Choschen Hamm 388,5: "If it can be proven
that someone has given the money of Israelite to Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration, to wipe them off
the face of the earth."
11. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds that belongs to the Akum (Gentile). He who returns
lost property to the Gentile sins against the law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the law. It is praise
worthy to return the lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely if by doing so, Christians will praise
the Jews, and look upon them as honorable people."
12. Szaaloth-Utzsabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks
if our books contain anything about them."
13. Baba Necia 114,6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
14. Simeon Hadarson, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah
comes, every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
15. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non Jew in human form so that Jew would not have to be
served by beasts. The non Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
16. Aboda Sara 37a: "A gentile girl who is 3
years of age can be violated."
17. Gad. Shas. 2.2: "A Jew may violate but may not marry a non Jew girl."
18. Tosefta. Aboda Zera, B 5: "If a Goy kills a Goy or a Jew
he is responsible, but if a Jew kills a Goy, he is not responsible."
19. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denounciator everywhere. It is
permitted to kill them before he denounces."
20. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belong to the Jewish nations, which,
consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without scruples."
Fredi Hazeem, Talmud Excerpts Sept 2016
Zionist vs. Jew
The real Holocaust is what
done to the world
By John Kaminski
Because Jews own most media worldwide, there simply is no noticeable discussion on a mainstream level of their
role in the wars and upheavals of society. How many famous commentators or legislators wouldn’t mention them on a
bet? From the volcanic time bomb ticking in Hawaii to America’s unsavory string of criminal wars against mostly defenseless
countries, Jews are the deliberately ignored factor without which none of these puzzling disasters can be adequately understood
The salient issue of the U.S. war against Syria that is almost never discussed in mainstream circles are the significant
oil deposits in the Golan Heights which Israel, with America’s approval, has stolen. As they did with Al-Qaeda, the
U.S. and Israel simply invented an enemy called ISIS which gave them the contrived media-assisted rationale to wage war
against innocent victim Syria.
And now in London a forthright ex-soldier — Jez Turner — has accurately described British history as
totally dominated by Jews, and for this, was sentenced by a court to a year in jail for simply mentioning an accurate historical
fact — that the country has been totally controlled by Jews since the 17th century. The sinister City of London fortress
and Britain’s corrupt monarchy provide ample evidence of this.
A new clampdown on the use of the word Jew in public utterances
is spreading like malignant mold in the minds of men. Say anything negative about Jews and likely you’ll be going
to jail, or, at least you can count on Jews trying to put you in jail. And given the Jewish predilection for controlling
the legal system, there’s a very good chance they’ll succeed.
The missing link in the 9/11 probe
Seventeen years of palaver
about the 9/11 caper has resulted in absolutely zero progress in identifying and apprehending the perpetrators of the greatest
crime in American history. The missing piece is clearly Jewish involvement, which is neatly kept in the shadows by Jewish
media, and enforced by a U.S. government totally controlled by Jews.
Now we have a movement revealed by South Carolina’s new
law which makes it a crime to criticize Israel. This is the real battle of anti-Semitism. The stakes are that Jews can get
away with any crime they commit because they can hide behind the shibboleth that criticism of Jews is a crime in and of
itself — the dreaded anti-Semitism.
And what crimes are those? Well, that’s quite a list! Start with both World Wars, the
demolition of the World Trade Center, the Federal Reserve, this whole string of faux terror incidents usually involving
schoolchildren, the poisoning of the food supply and the hidden timebombs in medicines, the centuries old fractional reserve
lending scams culminating in the derivatives boondoggle guaranteed to crash the world economy almost immediately if not
sooner, the total pollution of culture by the destruction of religious systems, and a family-fracturing legalization of
homosexuality that resulted in a form of self-destructive insanity being ordered by a totalitarian government.
Jews have turned our daughters
into whores and our sons into conscienceless swindlers.
In the dreary days of 2018, integrity can nowhere be found in public organizations, only rapacity
and love of money. This is the true legacy of the Jews.
We’ve come around this bend before, back in the days of George Bush 2 and his flunkie
general Colin Powell. They tried to insist it was both logical and sane to conflate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.
Back then (not so long ago, 2004) they were pretty much laughed out of the room. But the mindlock has seriously intensified
since then. You may not speak ill of Israel, and you may not use the world Jew in a negative context, or you will be stripped
of all your possessions and sent to jail, often without a trial, by Jewish judges and lawyers.
No more talking about Israeli soldiers
shooting Palestinian children in the head so their organs can be transplanted in palsied old Jews.
This is the new kosher totalitarianism
that has the world in its death grip as it crushes the minds of the people forced against their better nature to believe
facts that are demonstrably false.
Is the sabotage deliberate?
With any public debate
you have saboteurs who appear to be on one side but who are actually on the other. Which side you’re on, of course,
depends upon what you believe, and it’s safe to say that most of the people in the world have been badly educated,
thanks to Jewish manipulators, about the forces that control their lives.
I was really disappointed in late May 2018 when a man who knows
better, Mike Walsh, advocated the use of the word Zionist instead of the term Jew when assigning blame for most of the troubles
of the world. This is a battle I have been fighting for most of the last decade, and many other freedom fighter heroes have
been involved for much longer than that.
Walsh was commenting on the surprise jailing of British activist Jez Turner. Walsh blamed
Turner’s incarceration on the fact that he used the term Jew instead of the less-toxic label Zionist. Thus, Walsh joins
questionable media characters such as Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, Les Visible (a Jew) and David ‘Rothschild Zionism’
Icke as pretend Jew critics who are actually helping to conceal the Jewish role in today’s atrocity avalanche by using
such distracting synonyms as Zionist, Communist and other ‘progressive’ labels. They’re all Jews
or Jew wannabes, quite fond of the kosher contributions they may or may not receive. By confusing the public they are assisting
Jew criminals to remain anonymous, to remain beyond the consciousness of most Americans who think its the U.S. government
that is being so cruel toward them, when it’s really the Jewish puppetmasters who control everything from behind the
use of the term Zionism lets those Jews seeking to avoid exposure to non Jews off the hook and betrays all those activists
who have put their lives (and their freedom) on the line by opposing the Jewish menace and their kosher lies about history
(6 million et al) by speaking directly about them, and not using some smarmy synonym to protect themselves from Jewish
the great Henry Ford had a rule about what to call Jews that everyone would do well to follow.
The system of Jewish procedure is already fully known. How simple it is!
First, you secularize the public schools — “secularize” is the precise word the Jews use for the process.
You prepare the mind of the public school child by enforcing the rule that no mention shall ever be made to indicate that
culture or patriotism is in any way connected with the deeper principles of the Anglo-Saxon religion. Keep it out, every
sight and sound of it! Keep out also every word that will aid any child to identify the Jewish race. Then, when you have
thus prepared the soil, you can go into the universities and colleges and enter upon the double program of pouring contempt
on all the Anglo-Saxon landmarks, at the same time filling the void with Jewish revolutionary ideas.
Ford spotlighted the necessity
of teaching students that the major force attacking America was Jewish.
It is against this
that the Jews protest. “You must not identify us,” they say, “You must not use the term ‘Jew’.”
Why? Because unless the Jewish idea can creep in under the assumption of other than Jewish origin, it is doomed. Anglo-Saxon
ideas dare proclaim themselves and their origin.
The Jews, as the world is beginning to learn, hide their deepest thoughts behind false stories
in dark places.
The only aliens on this planet are the Jews, which is why they encourage all this prattling about ET this and extra
dimensional that. Their twisted holy book, the Talmud, insists that Jews are the only real humans, and that everybody else
on this planet is merely a farm animal, a slave to be used by the Jews for any purpose.
Are we going to forgive the presence of the Talmud, the most
egregious hate crime in human history which describes how the Jews may rob and kill anyone they want with no penalty because
the rest of the non-Jewish humans are nothing more than cattle — some Jews say cockroaches — to be fleeced and
slaughtered upon the twisted whims of very sick people.
You may say this is wishful thinking or conspiracy mongering, but I would say it’s right
in line with historical precedent set by the Jews in Russia with their hundred million non-Jewish deaths, or in Germany which
they totally destroyed because they weren’t allowed to keep Berlin as the smut capital of the world, or in Japan, which
they once lured into a World War by cutting off their supply of gasoline in order to pulverize them later on with what Eustace
Mullins called “the Jewish hell bomb”.
The current destruction of Europe is a totally Jewish operation and all the timid politicians
and writers are afraid to mention it lest they lose all their bribe money, or their paychecks from Jewish media giants.
But now it’s against
the law to mention any of these colossal crimes because it would be anti-Semitic. Out freedom of speech has been terminated
by these kosher crackpots. This indeed is the new totalitarianism, and it is totally Jewish.
You want to call them Zionists.
Go ahead. The Jews will thank you for it. I call them Jews and say before God that they are the scourge of the world.
John Kaminski is
a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing
a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his
work by mail:
6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
ANOTHER REASON TO DROP THE JEW TABOO?
Direct from the mouth
of a Jewess...
Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White
People (And That’s A Good Thing)
One of the more common memes that I’ve seen white supremacists
spread around recently has been “diversity is a code word for white genocide”. The concept here is
that diversity is only promoted in white nations, and that the end goal is to eliminate white people altogether
by flooding all white countries with non-white people until there are no white people left. Well, guess what,
white supremacists? That’s exactly right. Diversity IS about getting rid of white people, and that’s
a good thing.
First off, I am a white person myself, so allow me to get that out of the way. I’m extremely glad
that the white race is dying, and you should be too. White people do not have a right to exist. Period. That may
sound like a bold statement, but it’s entirely true. Any white person with even the faintest knowledge of
history should curse themselves every single day for being white. Throughout all of recorded history, whites have engaged
in oppression, genocide, colonialism, imperialism, and just plain evil on a massive scale. White people
have denied every other race the right to exist, and have – at some point in history – oppressed every
single race on the planet.
Why, then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have historically
been the world’s #1 source of conflict and oppression? Whiteness is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source
of all oppression in the world. Whiteness is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism,
Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism. Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression
that the world currently faces. No white people means no oppression. White people are like a cancer and oppression
is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer altogether – with the cancer being white people – and
you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause.
I have dedicated my life to fighting racism, and I have determined
– based on all available evidence – that the only way to really eliminate racism is to eliminate whiteness.
Whiteness is the ocean from which racism flows. Get rid of whiteness and you get rid of racism. Despite what white
supremacists often claim, white people do not have a “culture”. White “culture” consists
of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White “culture”
is racism and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white culture”, what they’re
really talking about is racism. Over the course of history, white people have built a massive empire based entirely
on the hard work of oppressed and disenfranchised minority groups. But guess what, white people? That empire is
finally coming to an end now, and its demise is music to my hears. To quote the great anti-racist activist Tim
Wise: “Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently?
Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”
Descendants of Holocaust survivors can personally attest to the evil that
white people are capable of when they hold the reins of power. Thankfully, whites won’t be holding the reins
of power for much longer. When white people die out, so will racism, sexism, queerphobia, and all other forms
of oppression. The only way to eliminate racism, white privilege, and white supremacy is to eliminate whiteness
altogether. When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory, and the role of whites in worldwide
oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness and how
they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children
and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.
Thankfully, white birthrates are
indeed very low, while the birthrates of minorities are much, MUCH higher. Within our lifetimes, whites will be
a minority in a significant number of formerly white countries, including the US, the UK, France, Germany, Australia,
Canada, and New Zealand, to name just a few. To white supremacists yearning for the days when whites could rape
and pillage the world with impunity, this is incredibly frightening. To people on the right side of history, however,
this looks like progress. Whites are finally getting their just desserts – and it’s about time. I sincerely
hope that, when the white power structure finally comes crashing down, whites will receive no mercy from the minority
groups that whites have spent centuries oppressing. We certainly don’t deserve any mercy or kindness, as
we have given nothing of the sort to others.
Whites should also know that, when they do become a minority in formerly
white countries, they will NOT be receiving affirmative action or any of the other benefits meant to assist the
minorities that whites have historically oppressed. Why? Because whites don’t deserve those benefits. It’s
as simple as that. One can look to South Africa, where whites are only about 8.4% of the population, but blacks
continue to receive affirmative action because blacks in South Africa have historically been disenfranchised by
whites. The same thing will happen when whites become a minority in North America, Europe, and Oceania, because
whites have historically oppressed minorities in all three of those continents. Not to mention, why should whites
receive any kind of benefits when the ultimate goal is to get rid of whites altogether? Finally, laws against hate speech
will serve to prevent whites from complaining about this, as any white person who complains will be arrested,
given a long prison sentence, and made an example of for the rest of the remaining white population. Speech that
attempts to justify the white power structure and perpetuate white oppression of minorities is not freedom of
speech, and it has absolutely no place in modern society.
As white people, we all need to recognize that we no longer have
a place in the world. This world now belongs to the minorities that us whites have spent centuries oppressing,
and there is absolutely nothing that any pathetic white supremacists can do about it. In order for a better world
to be created, white people need to be exterminated. Period. It’s as simple as that. We should simply be
thankful that our death will be accomplished through mass immigration and declining birthrates. When whites have
exterminated other races, it wasn’t nearly so peaceful – it was done through violent genocide. But
other races are not as evil as whites are, and it’s important to remember that. The world belongs to minorities
now, and they will make a much better, more peaceful world with what they’re given. Only when white people
have ceased to exist will a peaceful and progressive society – free of racism and hatred – be possible.
The only way to eliminate white privilege, white oppression, white racism, and the oppressive white power structure
is to eliminate white people altogether.
So, yes, white supremacists: diversity is indeed white genocide. And white genocide is exactly
what the world needs more than anything else.