The Greatest Mass Murderers of all Time were Jews, says Jewish
In 2006, a remarkable article — and admission —
appeared in the Israeli news source Ynet News. Titled “Stalin’s Jews”
and written by Jewish columnist Sever Plocker, this piece confirmed the terrible crimes which
Jewish Communists had committed under Stalin.
“We must not forget that some of greatest murderers of modern
times were Jewish,”
Plocker started out by saying. He went
on to make a number of startling confessions:
a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917,
in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment
The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution
and Sabotage, also known as Cheka.
a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational
structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later
to NKVD, and later to KGB.
“We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations,
but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of
the forced collectivization,
the hunger, large purges, expulsions,
banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.
population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie,
senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, “opposition members”
who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the
Communist party itself.
“In his new, highly praised book The War of
the World, Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the
of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his
book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University’s Dr. Igal Halfin writes
that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.
“Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale
cooperation of disciplined
‘terror officials,’ cruel
interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts
who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime
of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.
“And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name Genrikh
greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century,
the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD.
“Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible
for the deaths of at least 10 million people.
Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably,
Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in
1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty dwarf.”
Genrikh Yagoda, director of the NKVD, the Soviet Union’s Stalin-era security and intelligence agency.
was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his book Stalin: Court of the Red Star,
Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror,
Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was
surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.
“Stalin’s close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo
Montefiore characterizes him as the “first
Stalinist” and adds that those starving to death
an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind, did not move Kaganovich.
“Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution
and have blood on their hands for eternity.
We’ll mention just
one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD’s special
and the organization’s chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.
(center) inspecting the construction of the Moscow-Volga canal, built by slave labor from the Gulags.
“In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent
of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet
apparatuses were of Jewish origin. Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of ‘our hangmen,’
who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment.
After all, others will always remind us of their origin.”
The Gulags: Jewish-Run
mentioned above, the infamous Soviet Gulags were under the direct control of the Jew Yagoda. He was not the
only such Jew involved in the running of these camps, in which millions were interned and nearly 1.4
The most famous revelation about the Jewish nature of the
Gulags was that of famous dissident Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Speaking from personal
experience as a Gulag prisoner, Solzhenitsyn gave a candid account
of Jews in charge
of the Soviet prison camps in his book, Two Hundred Years Together.
to his observations, Jews made up a clear preponderance in the Gulag administration and in the early
Bolshevist government, saying that of the 22 ministers in the first Soviet government three were Russian,
one Armenian and 17 were Jews. In addition, he points out, from personal
experience once again, that “two thirds of the Kiev Cheka” (secret police) were Jews.
In 1937, another book appeared in Germany called Jewish-Run Concentration Camps
in the Soviet Union,
which revealed that Communist Jews were the commandants of 11
out of the 12 main Gulags.
Click on this text to read Full text of "200 Years Together" (Russo-Jewish History)... by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Look at Russian-Jewish History: The End of the Legends
It may be said without hesitation that Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Two Hundred Years Together. The Jews in the Soviet
Union is one of the most important books on the Russian Revolution and the early Bolshevik period ever to appear.
After publication of this work with its many revelations about the role of the Jews during the Leninist period, the history
of the Bolshevik October putsch will have to be rewritten, if not completely, then with substantial additions. The
book title might have been even more appropriately called "The End of the Legends."
The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution
and Russia's Early Soviet Regime
Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism
by Mark Weber
In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia's
last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their
four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the
Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult
for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.
Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been
shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret.
Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and
that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.
In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of
his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin's bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted
how he personally delivered Lenin's execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government
chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.1
Radzinsky's research confirmed what earlier
evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky -- one of Lenin's closest colleagues -- had revealed years earlier that Lenin
and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky
next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov,
I asked in passing: "Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?"
he replied. "He has been shot."
"And where is the family?"
"The family along with him."
of them?," I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.
"All of them,"
replied Sverdlov. "What about it?" He was waiting to see my reaction. I made no reply.
"And who made the decision?," I asked.
"We decided it here.
Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult
I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.
Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky
and others also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times
in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the Romanovs - originally published in 1920, and reissued
in 1993 by the Institute for Historical Review -- is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried
out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of "White" (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton's
book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia's imperial family.3
A solid understanding of history has long
been the best guide to comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people are most interested in
historical questions during times of crisis, when the future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in
the Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on the ruins of the old, historical issues have
become very topical. For example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the teachings of German-Jewish
social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?
In recent years, Jews around the world have
been voicing anxious concern over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union. In this new and
uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According
to one public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted all Jews to leave the country.4
But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many Russians,
Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame "the Jews" for so much misfortune?
A Taboo Subject
Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the country's total population,5
they played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the
Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians, along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades
preferred to ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.
With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists
who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's executive secretary and -- as chairman
of the Central Executive Committee -- head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist
International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included
press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel
(Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.7
A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin
viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. "An intelligent Russian,"
he once remarked, "is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins."8
In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably
Two weeks prior to
the Bolshevik "October Revolution" of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at
which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party's Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover.
Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian
(Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.9
To direct the takeover, a seven-man "Political Bureau" was chosen. It consisted of
two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev).10
Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet -- whose chairman was Trotsky -- established an 18-member "Military Revolutionary
Committee" to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole,
one Caucasian, and six Jews.11 Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central
Committee established a five-man "Revolutionary Military Center" as the Party's operations command. It consisted
of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).12
Contemporary Voices of Warning
Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at
the time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February
8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a "worldwide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence,
and impossible equality." The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:13
There is no need to exaggerate
the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable
exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power
comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the
influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator
of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews
is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the
Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited
in the breasts of the Russian people.
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: "The
Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any
other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution."14
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke,
made much the same point a few months later: "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread
in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and
whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."15
"The Bolshevik Revolution," declared a leading American Jewish
community paper in 1920, "was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct."16
As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist
character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime
in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish
sentiment.17 Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation
during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that "because so many of the
Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia
who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel."18
Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:19
Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews
were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin's first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish
Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including
its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution -- partly
because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization
drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik
secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.
The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious,
mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.
"Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka," wrote
Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, "stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by,
a Jewish investigator."20 In Ukraine, "Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,"
reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history.21 (Beginning as the Cheka, or Vecheka)
the Soviet secret police was later known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)
In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy,
the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the
Soviet chief who co-signed Lenin's execution order.22
Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply criticized the Jewish
role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading dissident
during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on
the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR.
In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, he noted that Jews were
"amazingly" numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the
Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:23
This ritual action symbolized
the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis
XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from
this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen
by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person responsible
for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room
where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended
Jehovah and was killed for the offense.
In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a similarly harsh assessment:24
The whole record of Bolshevism
in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew
Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov,
Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
In the struggle for power that followed Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin emerged
victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks
leaders - including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time, and particularly after 1928, the Jewish
role in the top leadership of the Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.
Put To Death Without Trial
For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing "Nicholas Romanov"
before a "Revolutionary Tribunal" that would publicize his "crimes against the people" before sentencing
him to death. Historical precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a consequence of revolutionary
upheaval: England's Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and France's Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.
In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial,
during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was
secretly put to death - along with his family and staff -- in the dead of night, in an act that resembled more a gangster-style
massacre than a formal execution.
did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former Tsar? In Wilton's view, Nicholas and his family were
murdered because the Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support, and rightly feared that
the Russian people would never approve killing the Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.
For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre
as a useful and even necesssary measure. He wrote:25
The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but necessary.
The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The
execution of the Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill a sense of hopelessness in
the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory
or total doom. This Lenin sensed well.
In the years leading
up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately represented in all of Russia's subversive leftist parties.26
Jewish hatred of the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading European powers of the day, imperial
Russia was the most institutionally conservative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted to reside
outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the "Pale of Settlement."27
However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward
the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify.
In a recently published book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina
goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the "historic sin of the Jews."28
She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps,
and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, "The Jews
of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition." In
light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:
The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the
subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and
the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.
If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek
the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame "the Jews" for the horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable
than to blame "white people" for Negro slavery, or "the Germans" for the Second World War or "the
Words of Grim
Nicholas and his family are only the
best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg
massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:29
Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the
scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii
let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie -- more blood, as much as possible.
Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918,
effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: "We must carry along with us 90 million out of
the 100 million of Soviet Russia's inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated."30
'The Twenty Million'
As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to
be much higher than Zinoviev's murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever, has a regime taken the lives of so many of
its own people.31
newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov, head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently
concluded that "from 1929 to 1952, 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a third were shot, the rest
sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died."32
Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and head
of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: "From January 1,
1935 to June 22, 1941, 19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were shot in prison, and
a majority of the others died in camp." These figures were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.33
Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist
of Soviet history, recently summed up the grim record of Soviet "repression" of it own people:34
It is hard to avoid the
conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933
famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting to another ten million plus. The total is thus
in the range of what the Russians now refer to as 'The Twenty Million'."
A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.35
The Tsarist Era in Retrospect
With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new
and more respectful look at their country's pre-Communist history, including the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the
Soviets -- along with many in the West -- have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an age of arbitrary
despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar
was absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice, and that the mass of the empire's citizens
were peasants, it is worth noting that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press, religion, assembly
and association, protection of private property, and free labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were
treated with remarkable leniency.36
During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian economy was booming. In fact, between
1890 and 1913, it was the fastest growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double that of the
Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled.37
Exported Russian grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia witnessed a magnificent flowering of
with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for Russia, but for the entire West.
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during the entire Soviet
era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas
II has been sweeping Russia in recent years.
People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours' wages to purchase portraits of Nicholas from street
vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes and apartments.
In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a 30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street
vendor: "I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It's like a nuclear explosion. People really want
to know about their Tsar and his family." Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up in many
A public opinion poll
conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as
a despicable crime.38 Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a martyr. The independent "Orthodox
Church Abroad" canonized the imperial family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under popular
pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox
Archbishop of Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of the killings. "The people
loved Emperor Nicholas," he said. "His memory lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without
court verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy."39
On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled
the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a large white cross festooned with flowers now marks
the spot where the family was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the victims.40
Reflecting both popular sentiment and new
social-political realities, the white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was officially adopted in
1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993, the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation's official
emblem, replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to honor Communist figures -- such as Leningrad,
Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin, and Gorky -- have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which had been named Sverdlovsk
by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name, which honors
Empress Catherine I.
In view of the millions that would
be put to death by the Soviet rulers in the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of extraordinary
importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:41
The manner in which the
massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something
that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.
Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the
killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century
of unprecedented agony and conflict.
The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas
II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.
The Massacre's Place in History
The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary upheavals
that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental
social order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its stable constitutional monarchy, and the
ancient Habsburg dynasty of Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe's leading states shared
not only the same Christian and Western cultural foundations, but most of the continent's reigning monarchs were related
by blood. England's King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar Nicholas, and, through his father, a first
cousin of Empress Alexandra. Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra, and a distant cousin
More than was the
case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia's Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of
the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass
slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort
to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.
- Edvard Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 327, 344-346.;
Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
an April 1935 entry in "Trotsky's Diary in Exile." Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New
York: Knopf, 1990), pp. 770, 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.; E. Radzinksy,
The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 325-326.; Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 349-350.
- On Wilton and his career in Russia, see: Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty (Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, 1976), pp. 141-142, 144-146, 151-152, 159, 162, 169, and, Anthony Summers and Tom Mangold, The File
on the Tsar (New York: Harper and Row, 1976), pp. 102-104, 176.
- AP dispatch from Moscow,
Toronto Star, Sept. 26, 1991, p. A2.; Similarly, a 1992 survey found that one-fourth of people in the republics
of Belarus (White Russia) and Uzbekistan favored deporting all Jews to a special Jewish region in Russian Siberia. "Survey
Finds Anti-Semitism on Rise in Ex-Soviet Lands," Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1992, p. A4.
- At the turn of the century, Jews made up 4.2 percent of the population of the Russian Empire. Richard Pipes, The
Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 55 (fn.).
By comparison, in the United States today, Jews make up less
than three percent of the total population (according to the most authoritative estimates).
individual entries in: H. Shukman, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Russian Revolution (Oxford: 1988), and
in: G. Wigoder, ed., Dictionary of Jewish Biography (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991).
The prominent Jewish
role in Russia's pre-1914 revolutionary underground, and in the early Soviet regime, is likewise confirmed in: Stanley Rothman
and S. Robert Lichter, Roots of Radicalism (New York: Oxford, 1982), pp. 92-94.
In 1918, the Bolshevik Party's
Central Committee had 15 members. German scholar Herman Fehst -- citing published Soviet records -- reported in his useful
1934 study that of six of these 15 were Jews. Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der
Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 68-72.; Robert Wilton, though, reported that in 1918 the Central
Committee of the Bolshevik party had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin and three were of Russian ancestry.
R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (IHR, 1993), p. 185.
- After years of official
suppression, this fact was acknowledged in 1991 in the Moscow weekly Ogonyok. See: Jewish Chronicle (London),
July 16, 1991.; See also: Letter by L. Horwitz in The New York Times, Aug. 5, 1992, which cites information from
the Russian journal "Native Land Archives."; "Lenin's Lineage?"'Jewish,' Claims Moscow News," Forward
(New York City), Feb. 28, 1992, pp. 1, 3.; M. Checinski, Jerusalem Post (weekly international edition), Jan. 26,
1991, p. 9.
- Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), p. 352.
- Harrison E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (Doubleday,
1978), p. 475.; William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 291-292.;
Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin:
1934), pp. 42-43.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 318-319.
This meeting was held on October 10 (old style, Julian calendar), and on October 23 (new style). The six Jews who took
part were: Uritsky, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov and Soklonikov.
The Bolsheviks seized power in Petersburg
on October 25 (old style) -- hence the reference to the "Great October Revolution" -- which is November 7 (new
- William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (1987), vol. 1, p. 292.; H.
E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 475.
H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 1, pp. 274, 299, 302, 306.; Alan Moorehead, The Russian Revolution
(New York: 1965), pp. 235, 238, 242, 243, 245.; H. Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum (Berlin: 1934), pp. 44, 45.
- H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978),
p. 479-480.; Dmitri Volkogonov, Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), pp. 27-28, 32.; P.
N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 319-320.
- "Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people," Illustrated Sunday Herald
(London), February 8, 1920. Facsimile reprint in: William Grimstad, The Six Million Reconsidered (1979), p. 124.
(At the time this essay was published, Churchill was serving as minister of war and air.)
R. Francis, Russia from the American Embassy (New York: 1921), p. 214.
Relations of the United States -- 1918 -- Russia, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: 1931), pp. 678-679.
Hebrew (New York), Sept. 1920. Quoted in: Nathan Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Beyond the Melting Pot
(Cambridge, Mass.: 1963), p. 268.
- C. Jacobson, "Jews in the USSR" in: American
Review on the Soviet Union, August 1945, p. 52.; Avtandil Rukhadze, Jews in the USSR: Figures, Facts, Comment
(Moscow: Novosti, 1978), pp. 10-11.
- T. Emmons and B. M. Patenaude, eds., War, Revolution
and Peace in Russia: The Passages of Frank Golder, 1913-1927 (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1992), pp. 320, 139, 317.
- Louis Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: Free Press, 1990), pp. 30,
31, 37. See also pp. 43, 44, 45, 49, 50.
- Quoted in: Salo Baron, The Russian Jews Under
Tsars and Soviets (New York: 1976), pp. 170, 392 (n. 4).
- The Atlantic, Sept.
1991, p. 14.;
In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews.
By order, the Cheka took few Jewish hostages. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 824.; Israeli historian
Louis Rapoport also confirms the dominant role played by Jews in the Soviet secret police throughout the 1920s and 1930s.
L. Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: 1990), pp. 30-31, 43-45, 49-50.
Radzinsky, The Last Tsar (1992), pp. 244, 303-304.; Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York
Times, Nov. 21, 1990.; See also: W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 2, p. 90.
- Quoted in: The New Republic, Feb. 5, 1990, pp. 30 ff.; Because of the alleged anti-Semitism of Russophobia,
in July 1992 Shafarevich was asked by the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC) to resign as an associate member
of that prestigious body.
- R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), p. 148.
- Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas
and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.
- An article in a 1907 issue of the respected
American journal National Geographic reported on the revolutionary situation brewing in Russia in the years before
the First World War: " The revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race, and the most effective revolutionary
agency is the Jewish Bund " W. E. Curtis, "The Revolution in Russia," The National Geographic Magazine,
May 1907, pp. 313-314.
Piotr Stolypin, probably imperial Russia's greatest statesman, was murdered in 1911 by a Jewish
assassin. In 1907, Jews made up about ten percent of Bolshevik party membership. In the Menshevik party, another faction
of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, the Jewish proportion was twice as high. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution
(1990), p. 365.; See also: R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), pp. 185-186.
Gilbert, Atlas of Jewish History (1977), pp. 71, 74.; In spite of the restrictive "Pale" policy, in 1897
about 315,000 Jews were living outside the Pale, most of them illegally. In 1900 more than 20,000 were living in the capital
of St. Petersburg, and another 9,000 in Moscow.
- Sonja Margolina, Das Ende der Lügen:
Russland und die Juden im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: 1992). Quoted in: "Ein ganz heisses Eisen angefasst," Deutsche
National-Zeitung (Munich), July 21, 1992, p. 12.
- Krasnaia Gazetta ("Red
Gazette"), September 1, 1918. Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 820, 912 (n. 88).
- Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 820.
- Contrary to what a number of western historians have for years suggested, Soviet terror and the Gulag camp system
did not begin with Stalin. At the end of 1920, Soviet Russia already had 84 concentration camps with approximately 50,000
prisoners. By October 1923 the number had increased to 315 camps with 70,000 inmates. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution
(1990), p. 836.
- Cited by historian Robert Conquest in a review/ article in The New York
Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
- The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23,
1993, p. 27.
- Review/article by Robert Conquest in The New York Review of Books, Sept.
23, 1993, p. 27.; In the "Great Terror" years of 1937-1938 alone, Conquest has calculated, approximately one million
were shot by the Soviet secret police, and another two million perished in Soviet camps. R. Conquest, The Great Terror
(New York: Oxford, 1990), pp. 485-486.;
Conquest has estimated that 13.5 to 14 million people perished in the collectivization
("dekulakization") campaign and forced famine of 1929-1933. R. Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow (New York:
Oxford, 1986), pp. 301-307.
- Russian professor Igor Bestuzhev-Lada, writing in a 1988 issue
of the Moscow weekly Nedelya, suggested that during the Stalin era alone (1935-1953), as many as 50 million people
were killed, condemned to camps from which they never emerged, or lost their lives as a direct result of the brutal "dekulakization"
campaign against the peasantry. "Soviets admit Stalin killed 50 million," The Sunday Times, London, April
R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has recently calculated that
61.9 million people were systematically killed by the Soviet Communist regime from 1917 to 1987. R. J. Rummel, Lethal
Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917 (Transaction, 1990).
- Because of his
revolutionary activities, Lenin was sentenced in 1897 to three years exile in Siberia. During this period of "punishment,"
he got married, wrote some 30 works, made extensive use of a well-stocked local library, subscribed to numerous foreign
periodicals, kept up a voluminous correspondence with supporters across Europe, and enjoyed numerous sport hunting and ice
skating excursions, while all the time receiving a state stipend. See: Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988),
pp. 42-57.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 55-75.
- R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 187-188.;
- The Nation,
June 24, 1991, p. 838.
- Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times,
Nov. 21, 1990.
- "Nostalgic for Nicholas, Russians Honor Their Last Czar," Los
Angeles Times, July 18, 1993.; "Ceremony marks Russian czar's death," Orange County Register, July
- R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.
From The Journal of Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 1994 (Vol. 14, No. 1), pages
Death Toll, and the Jewish Role in Bolshevism
We're relentlessly told that we must "never forget"
the "Six Million." But we hear far less about the vastly greater number of victims of Lenin and Stalin, and the
grim legacy of Soviet Communism. Some 20 million people perished as victims of the Soviet regime, historians acknowledge.
Jews played a decisive role in founding and promoting the egalitarian-universalist ideology of Marxism, in developing
the worldwide Marxist political movement, and in brutally imposing Bolshevik rule in Russia. With the notable exception
of Lenin, who was one-quarter Jewish, most of the leading Marxists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews, including
Trotsky, Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Radek.
Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Early Soviet Regime
Jews played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively
dominating the Soviet government during its early years ... With the notable exception of Lenin, most of the leading Communists
who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews ... The US ambassador in Russia warned in a dispatch to Washington: "The
Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any
other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution."
Background: This is the booklet accompanying a 1942 exhibition
on the Soviet Union, organized by the Nazi Party’s propaganda office. The brochure is 48 pages with
numerous black and white photographs of the exhibition. I translate only a part of it here, and include
five of the photographs. The Nazis put out a “documentary film” with the same title that supplemented
the exhibition. A version of that film with English subtitles is available from International Historic Films.
The source: Das Sowjet-Paradies.
Ausstellung der Reichspropagandaleitung der NSDAP. Ein Bericht in Wort und Bild. Berlin: Zentralverlag
der NSDAP., 1942. The German original is available here.
An Exhibition of the Nazi Party Central Propaganda Office
As early as 1934 the Reichspropagandaleitung of
the NSDAP organized an exhibition from the available written and visual material. Its goal was
to inform the German people about the dreadful conditions in the Soviet Union.
The exhibition’s organizers often had the feeling that their portrayal of conditions in the Soviet Union
was far from accurate. This feeling has since been confirmed — but in an entirely different
manner than expected. Everything that had been said about Bolshevism before the outbreak of the war
with the Soviet Union has been thrown into the shadows by reality. Words and pictures are not enough to
make the tragedy of Bolshevist reality believable to Europeans. This agrees with what our soldiers
repeatedly say. It is impossible to portray conditions in the Soviet Union without oneself having seen and
The idea therefore was
to provide German citizens with an exhibition based on everyday life under Bolshevism in order to
show them the misery of life there. A number of expeditions to areas held by our troops were made to gather
the necessary original material for the exhibition.
Millions of visitors have received an accurate picture of the misery of life under Bolshevism through
the numerous original items. Experts, above all our soldiers, still agree that even this exhibition
does not give a full picture of the misery and hopelessness of the lives of farmers and workers in the “Soviet
Riches of the East.”
section discusses the Soviet Union’s natural resources.]
The Germanic Settlement in the East.
[This section discusses German migrations to the east.]
Marxism and Bolshevism — The Invention of Jewry.
Early on, Jewry recognized unlimited possibilities for the Bolshevist nonsense in the East. This
is supported by two facts:
1. The inventor of Marxism
was the Jew Marx-Mordochai;
2. The present Soviet
state is nothing other than the realization of that Jewish invention. The Bolshevist revolution itself stands
between these two facts. The Jews exterminated the best elements of the East to make themselves the
absolute rulers of an area from which they hoped to establish world domination. According to the GPU’s
figures, nearly two million people were executed during the years 1917 to 1921. A direct result of the revolution
was the terrible famine that demanded 19 million victims between 1917 and 1934. Over 21 million people
lost their lives though this Jew-incited revolution and its consequences.
The Facade of Bolshevism
The bloody attacks of Bolshevism into Europe were always accompanied by wild agitation
that claimed that the Soviet Union was the “paradise of farmers and workers.” In reality this
was propaganda, and all the cultural, social and technical advances that Bolshevism claimed were nothing
but a deceptive facade that concealed the gray misery of daily life under Bolshevism. This is illustrated
in the next room of the exhibition. In its center, there is an original Bolshevist monument mass produced
from plaster on a wood frame. One was found in every city. Because of their poor quality they quickly
began crumbling, a true example of Bolshevist culture. Such monuments intensify the dirty and miserable
atmosphere that all Soviet cities share, interrupted only by a few prestige buildings that display
technical weaknesses. They are built for propaganda purposes, and to deceive travelers from abroad.
These facades, built only for propaganda reasons, are the mark of all
Bolshevist cities. Model streets in the American style are filled with huge buildings with a thousand
deficiencies, which mock the miserable workers who are forced even after 25 years of Bolshevist culture to live gray and joyless lives.
The contrast between government buildings and the general wretched housing
is the same as the difference between military production and those things that are necessary for daily life.
The enormous military expenditures dwarf those of all other nations, but everyday goods are of wretched
quality. The war is not responsible for the population’s lack of cups and saucers, furniture and
beds, the most basic decorative items such as curtains or inexpensive carpets, not to mention the most
necessary items of clothing. Such things are just as expensive as foodstuffs. A generous estimate
of the weekly average wage of a worker is 100-125 rubles. Here are the costs:
1400 rubles for a suit
360 rubles for a pair of shoes
24 rubles for a kilo of butter
22 rubles for a kilo of meat
Those were the peacetime prices in the USSR, which does not however mean
that such things could actually be bought. Bad bread and potatoes were the almost exclusive diet of the miserable
population during the Bolshevist system’s 20 years of peace.
The glaring contrast between the between the splendid weaponry and the deep poverty
of the people is clear from the living conditions in Moscow, which by the way are neither better nor worse than those in other Bolshevist cities. Conditions
were not particularly good even before the war in 1913. But by 1928 four people lived in the average room,
and six by 1939, independent of whether or not they were related. All usable rooms are jammed full.
Normal dwellings of the kind we are used to in Germany are unknown. Each room is a kitchen, living room,
and bedroom for its inhabitants. If one looks for those responsible for these miserable conditions,
one always finds Jews. Is it not interesting that the word “anti-Semite” is the worst thing
one can be accused of in the Soviet state, for which one all too easily is sentenced to forced labor or death?
A look at the statistics on the Jewdification of high offices in the Soviet Union makes everything
Nearly all the ministries, which the Bolshevists
call “people’s commissions,” are controlled by the Jews.
Further proof that the Soviet state belongs to the Jews is the fact that
the people are ruthlessly sacrificed for the goals of the Jewish world revolution. Besides the notorious
Stachanov system, women are systematically degraded to labor slaves. Even during peace, women increasingly
worked even in the hardest jobs such as coal mining and the smelting industry.
A further fact makes clear to the expert that the Jews are behind Soviet
industrial structure: The Woroschilov factory in Minsk was supposed to produce 650 machines tools with a value
of 81 million rubles annually. Given the nature of Jewish thinking, the decisive thing was the total
value of the production. Because of a lack of experts, tools, and parts the factory produced only
480 machine tools with a value of 59.2 million rubles. To fulfill the plan, the factory managers secretly
built a boiler-maker in the back, which produced goods sold at black market prices. This made
up for the difference of 22 million rubles. The plan was thus met with production of 81 million rubles,
even though 170 too few machines were produced.
Soviet Army — A Terrible Threat to Europe.
Ever since the murder of the Tsar, the Jewish-Bolshevist ruling clique in Moscow has planned the
annihilation of Europe. All raw materials and the whole labor force were exploited ruthlessly to meet
this goal. Foreign specialists and engineers were brought in to make up for the domestic failings. Production
figures that astonished the entire world resulted. This became evident in the Wehrmacht’s figures
on captured war booty.
180,000,000 people had to work under the most brutal and primitive conditions solely for armaments production.
That is the explanation for the unimaginable amount of Bolshevist weaponry, most of which has been destroyed
or captured in the great battles of annihilation of the Eastern campaign.
This vast armory was intended to help Jewry overrun Europe. In preparation, Bolshevism
had prepared its positions in Finland, the Baltic, Poland, and Bessarabia. These were the bases from
which the decisive blows would be struck against the West.
The vast extent of this weaponry, some of which still exists, is perhaps best shown by the booty
of the great encirclement battles of 1941 and the winter battles: 25,000 tanks, 32,000 heavy guns,
and 16,000 airplanes were captured or destroyed, and over 4,000,000 prisoners were taken.
Classes in a Classless State
Bolshevism preached that there would of course be no classes
in its paradise, since only the proletariat would remain after the elimination of the former ruling class.
The emptiness of the claim is obvious to any unprejudiced observer, who can see the degrees of slavery
among the population. The Jewish ruling class and its lackeys are at the top, then the masses of factory
workers in the cities. A deep chasm separates them from the totally impoverished collective farmers.
Bolshevism intentionally created these great differences for two reasons:
1. To lure the masses to the cities to support the Bolshevist armaments program;
2. To give the workers the impression that they are better off than the
farmers and to deceive them into believing that their primitive and miserable life is wonderful in comparison
to that of the collective farmers. The workers do not and cannot know that by our standards their
existence is wretched, since they are hermetically sealed off from the rest of the world. Beside the
workers and the collective farmers, there are two classes without any rights at all: the members of the former
intelligentsia and the middle class, who are not of proletarian descent. There are also forced laborers,
who are used as cheap and defenseless slaves in the vast uncultivated regions. Millions of them die
as the result of bad food, poor accommodations and hard work.
The GPU — The Terror Instrument of Jewish Bolshevism
The brutal terror Bolshevism exercises through the GPU is perhaps
the best answer to the frequent question of why the Bolshevists fight so bitterly at the front. 25 years
of terror have produced a gray and broken mass who silently follow orders because that is their only
way to remain alive. Resistance means death, often the death of the entire family. The bestial terror regime
of the Jewish GPU is best seen in the sadistic methods of torture used against supposed “enemies.”
The exhibition includes an execution cell from a GPU dungeon. According
to a captured commissar, nearly 5,000 people were shot by the GPU in five years behind its iron bars.
The cell is tiled. The condemned were brought to the cell and shot in
the back of the neck. The corpses were moved to the side and sprayed with a hose to wash away the blood.
A fan provided fresh air so that the next victim would not faint from the blood, because he was to
remain conscious until the last moment.
narrow cell was used to secure confessions. Prisoners were forced to kneel for hours. If they stood up they
hit the ceiling and set off an alarm, and a spotlight was aimed toward them. If they sat on the small
seat they got an electric shock that forced them off. A wooden prong on the door pressed against their
The worst of all terror institutes
of the GPU are the forced labor camps in which millions of innocent victims die every year. Only rarely
do they know why they were taken from their families and jobs to work in the icy wastes of Workuta
or any of the numerous other labor camps. Most of them are there only because free labor was needed somewhere
in the wilderness. No one cared about them. They were shipped there under the principle: “People?
We have enough of such trash.”
unhappy victims, condemned with or without cause, follow a miserable path from which death is the only real
It begins with a spy, often a member
of one’s own family. One night the GPU knocks on the door and takes its victim. Put in narrow
cells, worn out by endless interrogations. and finally forced to confess by the usual methods of torture,
with or without a verdict, they are transported to forced labor camps with inadequate food, often in the bitter
cold. Many die on the way. In the forced labor camps themselves, they are stuffed into small barracks.
The pitiful food ration depends on the amount of work done. It is never enough, and the hard work soon
leads to exhaustion. The smallest offense is punished severely by a spell in an ice cell. Continual
overwork, bad food, and the lack of sanitary facilities soon lead to serious illness. The sick forced laborers
are put on starvation rations to speed their deaths, for the GPU has no interest in weak workers.
They must be disposed of as quickly as possible.
few forced laborers return to freedom. Kajetan Klug was one of them. He was a leader of the Marxist Defense
League in Linz. After the unsuccessful insurrection of February 1934, he had to flee the revenge of
the Dolfuß regime. His route led him through Czechoslovakia to the land of his dreams, the “Paradise
of Farmers and Workers.” In Moscow he took over the leadership of the Austrian emigrants and became
a party member. But he soon learned the misery of the workers and farmers. When he openly criticized
these conditions, he was accused of espionage. He was arrested, tortured, acquitted, and finally condemned
with no proof to 5 years of forced labor in Central Asia. The wintry wasteland of Workuta finally opened
his eyes to the real nature of the “Paradise of Farmers and Workers.” A few days before the beginning
of the war with the Soviet Union, he succeeded in escaping to the German embassy. Along with the embassy
personnel, he was able to reach Germany.
Misery of the Collective Farmers
[This section discusses life on collective farms.]
The Life of the Worker in the Soviet Paradise
Wherever one looks there is poverty, misery, decay, and hunger. This true
both of the countryside and the cities. The atmosphere of Bolshevist cities, too, is grim and depressing.
The exhibition here, all the experts agree, is particularly genuine.
It always astonishes, for the simple reason that the terrible things it makes visible are real. Here is a
Bolshevist culture park, with its mass produced sculptures that cannot endure the weather because
of their poor quality. They add to the atmosphere of general atmosphere of decay that all cities in the land
of the Bolshevists share. There, just as it was originally, is a collapsing barracks, a so-called home
for students, standing in the shadow of a university built on the American model. Its wretched inhabitants
at least have a good view of the prestige buildings. From a distance, one cannot see that the quality of
every aspect of the buildings is wretched.
The interior of the dormitory corresponds to its exterior. Broken chairs, a damaged bed with torn
coverings, a shabby ceiling, a few propaganda posters and books, an old curtain: That is the room
of the dormitory leader. As many as eleven less fortunate inhabitants are packed into the other rooms. A washroom
for 63 students, without running water, is next to the dormitory leader’s room.
Look into any side street. A dark hole of a shop with the most primitive
things: paper clothing (in peace time!), bread, a few cans and bottles. A modest supply of everyday
items. It is a government shop. It is governmental because there are no shopkeepers in the Soviet “paradise,”
at least in our sense. Nor are there any craftsmen or independent merchants, since private property
has been abolished. Next door there is the workshop of a private cobbler, an exception to the usual ban
on private property, since he works on his own and is not a member of the normal collective. Still,
high taxes take a large part of his modest income, which is hardly enough to provide for himself and his
Hidden behind a pile of garbage in a courtyard
in the center of Minsk is a restaurant, also a state enterprise. It is miserably equipped. The guests
need to bring their own eating utensils. Such items are rare enough so that they would otherwise be stolen.
And this is not a place for the poor. It is frequented by managers and government officials. The manager
has a special room for his favored guests with several shabby upholstered chairs. The food itself comes
from a factory and is always the same, which led to constant complaints in the comment book. And that in
Alongside the prestige buildings
of the university, there are numerous wretched workers’ dwellings. One of them was removed to
be part of the exhibition along with all its furnishings. Six families lived here. Each had a single room
that served as bedroom, kitchen, and storage room. There was no running water, and the women all agreed
that things were so crowded they could never get things in order. Still, they thought these were good
rooms since at least they were dry and warm. Many of their comrades lived in wet basements, in caves, or had
no roof over their head at all, since the city government did not worry about the many homeless. Everywhere
there was desolation and apathy.
than all this misery is the complete disruption of family life, indeed the beginning of its complete elimination.
The exhibition includes one of those offices where marriages are performed for a charge of 50 rubles,
without any need for documents. There are countless cases in which men and women have been married
numerous times, without ever getting divorced from their previous spouses. The reason is that papers are
rarely checked carefully.
The result of such
terrible disruption of marriages and families must inevitably lead to complete misery and decay of the youth.
The exhibition shows this by the example of the Besprisornys. These gangs of boys from 4 to 15 rob
and steal to support themselves. They live in collapsing buildings and caves. According to people
in Minsk, a city of 300,000, there are 3,000 such orphaned children. These deserted children say that they
never knew their fathers or mothers, and have no names. They do not know how old they are. One such
Besprisornys gang was captured and put in a German orphanage. Their clothing is on mannequins that give a realistic
picture of how these unfortunate children lived in complete misery in the “Soviet Paradise.”
Many displays give a picture of everyday life in the Soviet Paradise.
A doctor’s office deserves special notice. It gives the lie to all the Bolshevist propaganda about
the “exemplary social condition” in the Soviet Union. As a result of the abolition of private
property, the doctor is a poorly paid state employee earning 400 rubles a month. She has three
rooms, one of which she lives in, one a waiting room, and one the treatment room. The medicines and equipment,
the operating table and everything else are unbelievably primitive and do not meet even the minimum
hygienic standards. This doctor had 30,000 people to care for, many of whom lived more than a day’s
travel from her office.
Poverty, misery, decay, hunger, and need wherever one looks: That is the Soviet paradise that our soldiers experience
every day, and that millions of exhibition visitors encountered in many original displays that
give them a genuine picture of the so loudly praised social accomplishments of the Jewish-Soviet state.
He who has seen the exhibition understands the historic conflict in which we are now engaged, a conflict
in which there can be no compromise. There are only two possible outcomes: Either the German people
will win and ensure the survival of the world and its culture, or it will perish and all the peoples of
the world will fall into the barbarism of the Soviet state that has reduced millions to powerless
To stop that from happening,
the best elements of Europe are fighting under German leadership at the side of our soldiers to destroy
the fateful threat to the life and culture of Europe. Our battle is to free the East, along with its vast
and inexhaustible riches and agricultural resources, and to save Europe from the nightmare that has
threatened it for millennia. In the words of the Führer:
“In defeating this enemy, we remove a danger from the German Reich and
all of Europe more severe than any it has faced since the Mongol hordes swarmed across the continent.”